Is 'Success' of US Surge In Iraq About To Unravel?
BAGHDAD - A cease-fire critical to the improved security situation in Iraq appeared to unravel Monday when a militia loyal to radical Shiite Muslim cleric Muqtada al Sadr began shutting down neighborhoods in west Baghdad and issuing demands of the central government.
Simultaneously, in the strategic southern port city of Basra, where Sadr's Mahdi militia is in control, the Iraqi government launched a crackdown in the face of warnings by Sadr's followers that they'll fight government forces if any Sadrists are detained. By 1 a.m. Arab satellite news channels reported clashes between the Mahdi Army and police in Basra.
The freeze on offensive activity by Sadr's Mahdi Army has been a major factor behind the recent drop in violence in Iraq, and there were fears that the confrontation that's erupted in Baghdad and Basra could end the lull in attacks, assassinations, kidnappings and bombings.
As the U.S. military recorded its 4,000th death in Iraq, U.S. officials in Baghdad warned again Monday that drawing down troops too quickly could collapse Iraq's fragile security situation.
Pentagon officials said that military leaders are watching for any signs of backsliding as they consider whether to keep drawing down troops below pre-surge levels.
President Bush spoke about the death toll, saying, "One day, people will look back at this moment in history and say, 'Thank God there were courageous people willing to serve, because they laid the foundations for peace for generations to come.' "
Even as he spoke, the situation on the ground was rapidly worsening.
On Sunday, a barrage of at least 17 rockets hit the heavily fortified Green Zone and surrounding neighborhoods, where both the U.S. and Iraqi government headquarters are housed, according to police. Most of them were launched from the outskirts of Sadr City and Bayaa, both Mahdi Army-controlled neighborhoods.
On Monday, the Sadrists all but shut down the neighborhoods they control on the west bank of Baghdad. Gunmen went to stores and ordered them to close as militiamen stood in the streets. Mosques used their loudspeakers to urge people to come forward and join the protest.
Fliers were distributed with the Sadrists' three demands of the Iraqi government: to release detainees, stop targeting Sadrist members and apologize to the families and the tribal sheiks of the men.
The Iraqi security forces issued a statement promising to deal with those who terrorized shopkeepers and students.
"It's an open sit-in until the government responds to our demands. If the government doesn't respond, we will have our own procedures," said Hamdallah al Rikabi, the head of the Sadr offices in Karkh, in western Baghdad.
In the southern port city of Basra, where Shiite groups are battling for power, the Mahdi Army is the most feared force. The British military pulled out of the city late last year, leaving the city in the militia's hands.
The Iraqi government announced a three-day security plan, beginning 5 p.m. Tuesday, to seal Basra off from other governorates and countries, shut down schools and all institutes of education and ban vehicles from entering the province. Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki, as well as the ministers of defense and interior, were in Basra on Monday.
Since Sadr froze his militia on Aug. 29 and renewed the freeze in February, militia members and Sadrists have railed against the government for targeting and detaining their members. In Basra, Sadr's office rejected the security plan and warned that it'll react if attacked or if Iraqi forces detain more Sadrists.
As Shiite violence rises, U.S. troop deaths also appear to be rising in places such as Baghdad, where the American military is thinning out its presence as part of its drawdown of five brigades. Attacks against civilians in the capital are rising, according to statistics compiled by McClatchy. Next week, the U.S. will finish pulling out the second of five surge brigades. As part of the drawdown, the military has moved battalions out of Baghdad toward more violent areas such as the northern city of Mosul and Iraq's northeastern Diyala province.
As the troop presence has shifted, so has the violence. For the first time since January, a majority of U.S. troops were killed in Baghdad, not in outlying northern provinces. Indeed, the U.S. military reached the death of its 4,000th soldier in Iraq on Sunday, when four U.S. soldiers were killed in southern Baghdad.
So far, this month, 27 soldiers have been killed in Iraq. Of those, 16, or 59 percent, died in Baghdad. In January, 25 percent of U.S. deaths happened in Baghdad, or 10 of 40.
Civilian casualties in Baghdad are also on the rise, according to a McClatchy count. After a record low through November, when at least 76 people were killed and 306 were injured, the deaths began to rise. In December, it crept up to 88 people killed, in January 100 and in February 172. As of March 24, at least 149 people were killed and 448 were injured.
Youssef reported from Washington. McClatchy special correspondents Laith Hammoudi reported from Baghdad and Ali al Basri reported from Basra.
© McClatchy Newspapers 2008
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
57 Comments so far
Show AllRegardless of the facts Iran will be blamed for funding Sadr and enabling these events which will then be used as a pretext to attack Iran. Mission Accomplished.
This (private) war began to unravel with the very first lie about the reason(s) why an absolute president was taking our country to war with another country that had no connection to the tragic events of September 11, 2001. This (private) war began to unravel when our military actually went to war under the supervision of a supreme megalomaniac, Donal Rumsfeld (Ronald Reagan's 1982 chemical weapons delivery boy),and when the micromanagers of this administration failed to secure the borders of Iraq; something this administration has lots of experience in dealing with, porous borders. This (private) war began to unravel because it had no strategies, no end game, and because it was being supervised by the most powerful president I believe our nation has ever seen or witnessed, Dick Cheney, the man who will reap billions of dollars in red oil money, and a man of few words. "So?" So, as the lights go out in Washington in 2009, Bush, Cheney, Rice and the entire team will sneak out of the city like thieves in the night, and many more with presidential pardons in hand; and there will be no accountability other than that of the next president who will turn the lights back on only to find that our house was ransacked and that the cost to put in back in order will begin to unravel for generations to come. However, if the next president happens to be John McCain; then we can look forward to at least 4 more years of McCain's 100 year war plan that will continue to unravel until we have reached economic extinction.
Sadly, the US mainstream media does not report the truth of what is going on in Iraq. Take a moment, and go to the link below to see a report and a short video produced by GuardianFlims for Channel 4 in the Uk. The truth about the "strike" is reported in the UK.
"An investigation carried out by GuardianFilms for Channel 4 uncovers how thousands of Iraqis employed at $10 a day by the US to take on al-Qaida are threatening to go on strike because they say they have been used by the 'Americans to do their dirty work' and haven't been paid."
Full article at;
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/video/80527/
Iraq will be to the USA, what Afganhastan was to the former USSR -- the beginning of the end of empire.
[Unless of course, the US-Israeli axis launches an attack upon Iran and starts WWIII. Oh well, nuclear winter is one way to combat Global Warming.]
There never was any success in the surge.
You keep hearing about the 4000 dead American soldiers but you bever hear of the "other" 1000. The American suicides that came from this dirty illgotten war! There are 5000 dead Americans and a over a million dead innocent Iraquis and yet another huge number of displaced Iraquis!
Bush should realize the disgrace is from staying there NOT leaving!
Oh well.
At least the Bush gang can move to their new 100,000 acre compound in Paraguay after the present Bush leaves the Presidency.
The family will get to live on top of the world's largest aquifer (guarani), near the powerhouse waterfalls that make the borders of Brazil and Paraguay. And they'll be protected by US soldiers stationed at the nearby military base. The base has a much longer landing space as compared to that at Asuncion's international airport.
I believe the Paraguayan government has no extradition treaties nor do US military personnel have to answer to the Hague.
Last, and of course, not least, the Chaco area of Paraguay (where their compound is located) is a notorious and crucial transit point for the sale of big item military hardware and an assortment of drugs...expecially coke.
The last should keep our ex-President happy and constantly sniffling for years to come.
Oh did you know that the Bush's neighbor, Reverend Moon (a close family friend), has acquired an almost one million acre tract of Paraguay's Chaco region?
Interesting piece peterrb2 (frightening too). One has to wonder if the underlying force behind all the irrationality in Cheney&Co is an absolute refusal to accept deals of any kind. In any event, if the resistance to American forces in Iraq is supported by not only Teheran but Moscow and Pekin too, we may be really facing defeat sooner rather than later. After all, isn't this whole war being financed on a credit card underwritten by China?
check out http://www.voltairenet.org/article155950.html and its links (footnotes) to see how Fallon's role played into the "surge," and how with his resignation we now have a sudden resumption of violence, including renewed efforts to target US soldiers.
The "surge" behind the scenes was actually Fallon negotiating with multiple parties to try to bring down the violence, so the "surge" was perceived as working. But his program was not accepted by Chubushka, not violent enough probably, as they are hungry to provoke Iran, dreaming of a new Pearl Harbor, so Fallon resigned and the pieces blew back into the dust pile.
"For the real truth about how we got here, watch Frontline tonight - Part II of Bush's War. You won't learn much new (at least CD folks) but at least it's great to hear the real truth."
PBS efforts and success are commendable ; with a few exceptions it is a sermon directed at the converted . The complicit sinners are watching survival poker or are asleep after working at three jobs in one day to pay for medical costs and won't or don't want to hear the real truth . Only in America , you say . Watching survival poker when there is moral and economic decay in America is like rearranging the deck-chairs on the Titanic . With typical jingoistic , indifference of most Americans , they deserve to drown and go down with the sinking empire.
Very interesting to watch PBS's Frontline, Bush's War and see the vile idiots that had such a hard-on for launching this war; the NeoCON's lead by Cheney. Tonight part two at 9 PM.
Watch it...
The illegal and immoral occupation of Iraq was never RAVELED in the first place. So it can't come unraveled. The surge along with every move and statement by Bu$h the inferior and Shotgun Dick was designed as a publicity stunt to allow the oil rich investors and managers to get richer and seize unprecedented power from the people, state governments and Congress. The military privatization is well under way and will soon involve foreign mercenaries enforcing military law and protecting government officials in the USA under the guise of some vague threat to our homeland. (FATHERLAND?)
The growth of government is greater under this so called small government Republican than any recent administration. The government is now basically a racket to send tax dollars to political contributors in return for campaign contributions.
'Thank God there were courageous people willing to serve, because they laid the foundations for peace for generations to come.' "
**and he was too busy to go to Vietnam
I think if I were an Iraqi that has been living through all of the crap thats gone on over the past five years, I would join an anti-american militia. And I like to think of myself as a peaceful, non-violence type person, but everyone has their tipping point. If I were an Iraqi, I think my tipping point would be watching the news and seeing the recent polls in the US's election: perpetual-war McCain in the lead. That would be about the point I pick up a gun and kill someone. There are real terrorist, and there are just those who don't like people invading and occupying their country. I'm not sure which al Sadr is, but I can understand the anger his followers are feeling (actually, I can't understand their anger because I have never been in such a horrible situation as them).
I wonder if the Mad CowBoy, will start dancing the latest rage...."Da Muqtada al Sadr SURGE".
They say that, "it's about time for Da Nu SURGE".
Another oldie, but goodie is, "Da Guerrilla Blasts"
Let's hear it for those big favorites, "Da Prophet (pbuh) Rockets"
"Its going to be a hot time in the old town, tonight....Baghdad,..dat is"
When I think of Mesopotamia.....I keep hearing that 1977 song...."HOTEL CALIFORNIA"........over & over again!!!!!
Think Bush and Cheney are dancing tonight???????
The statement or assersion that the surge was successful for stopping the violence in Iraq is proposterous.The reason that the violence was curtailed is because the shitheads in Washington were paying Al Sadr and the other clerics and the tribal leader`s to help oust Al queda so they could advance there own agenda`s while BushCo paid them. About a month ago Al Sadr called the cease fire off that is why the violence has started to increase.
I still cannot believe how stupid the American public is!!!!!!!!!!
SO
OH THAT WORD SAYS IT ALL
To Truthmonger, who is promoting the Frontline report as giving us the truth about the Iraq war: I watched the first episode and found the added detail interesting. Only one fact was missing-the reason Bush and Cheny wanted to attack Iraq. Anybody?
The solution might be a "super surge". 1.5 million well trained infantry to form a skirmish line and walk off the entire country, secure the borders, confiscate every weapon, destroy any munitions caches, disarm the militias, and shoot anyone who resists. The insurgents, al qaeda and the bully boys might start to get the message after one or two gangs or miltias taking refuge in mosques are wiped out.
We would need another force(s). The fierce South Koreans would be great, but they might have too many Christians. Maybe the Chinese. The US military would continue air support, police activity, logistics...
Leave this force in place while an Iraqi force is trained, and make sure its the ONLY Iraqi force with guns. Set up an Iraqi intelligence/federal law enforcement agency. Then bring in the UN blue hats and go home.
The surge is "working" because everyone has either fled, been killed, imprisoned, or behind the walls of the Green Zone.
Now that Sadr's militia have been reined in long enough, they will take up where they left off.
That's what a sovereign country does to those who would occupy it.
We should have left Iraq five years ago.
The truth is, if you look at the death toll for Iraqis and Coalition soldiers over the years, it has increased exponentially, tending to peak around holidays. So, again, what exactly is "working"?
glenn goodman,
Cheers!
"The Surge is a highly successful publicity stunt and political maneuver. The reduced death toll is due to Muktada Al Sadr's ceasefire."
Exactly!
The "success" is otherwise what is called a "coincidence"--as in, the modicum of lesser-lives-lost (in this case accomplished via Muqtada al Sadr) COINCIDED WITH our troop surge.
The argument that the troop surge is "working" is based on the same logical fallacy as the argument that our border vigilance is "working" just because there haven't been any major terrorist attacks in recent years. According to this argument, our supreme anti-terrorist techniques in place all the years before the Bush Administration and 9/11 were "working." Let's go back!
Furthermore, and on the article, it seems that the [puppet] Iraqi govt, or else the [puppet] Iraqi PM Nouri Al-Maliki, is ... like [intentionally] provoking the Mahdi Army, stoking the fires of their anger and resistance.
If that is indeed intended, then I don't like what it seems to signify, which (I fear) might be to provoke more sectarian fighting, civil warring, and thereby more elimination of Iraqis; or what's called 'liberation', in the insane and lying minds of the Bush administration sort of fiends.
The demands that the article states the Mahdi Army has for the Iraqi govt to comply with seem fine, right to me. That they demand for the govt to stop targeting the Mahdi Army seems strongly legitimate.
If that's true, then as per above. And if all of the above is true, then the article also caused me to wonder about what the real purpose of the U.S. emplying 80,000 or so former Sunni Iraqi resistance figthers is. Could it have been either solely or in part for the above-stated purpose? I wonder.
Questioning minds ... question ... plenty. Curiosity, they say, kills cats, but this cat's still alive and in no fear of dying due to the mind not ceasing to ask or think of questions. So, and given it's my nature, I wonder about the above ... possibility, say.
" peace coup March 25th, 2008 11:05 am
...
Bush is confident in his actions because he sees a future Middle East that is based on market values and democracies that can be bought and sold by the highest bidder. ..."
I'M NOT SURE OF THAT. Instead, I think "Bush is confident" for two or more reasons, but will state the two I have in mind, and won't spend time trying to see if I could think of what the others might be. And the two are:
*) Bush is INSANE, psychopath, ...; and,
*) He is a puppet doing what he's directed to do.
His directors are confident he'll do the job he's told to do, and it's why he was [appointed] president in 2000, for starters.
He probably doesn't have more understanding of 'market values' than a 4-year-old child does; when the child hasn't been taught about this topic by competent parents anyway.
And he probably doesn't really understand what 'democracy' means, or not to any noteworthy extent anyway.
Karl Rove was called "Bush's brain" and there was [reason] for this perspective; Bush lacks one, a noteworthy one anyway.
Remember that he completely botched up with his relatively minor petroleum company? Remember that the Carlyle board got rid of him because he was just too [stupid]?
So I've read anyway.
This is how guerilla wars work. One side adopts new tactics that give it a temporary advantage until the other side figures out ways to neutralize them. Repeat indefinitely. In the meantime, the real causes for the conflict are ignored. There is no military solution.
The definition of insantiy fits:
Do the same thing over and over again, but expect a different result after each foolish attempt.
Al Sadr had one of his guys read out this statement, translated by the BBC,a little while ago: "We demand that religious and political leaders intervene to stop the attacks on poor people. We call on all Iraqis to launch protests across all the provinces. If the government does not respect these demands, the second step will be general civil disobedience in Baghdad and the Iraqi provinces." That's about it for the ceasefire.
There can be no real success in Iraq for the evil regimes which unlawfully attacked it. Regardless of the outcome, the whole operation is a colossal failure from a global strategic and historic perspective because now everyone in the world knows what kind of worthless scum are the U.S. and the sychophants of evil who suck at the tit of "power", whereas before the invasion of Iraq only the "players" knew that perspective. As with all empires, it is the evil people in the society who percolate to the top because the scum always attract and recruit those type of people who are of a like mind-set, but they only advance and promote those individuals who are slightly stupider than themselves, in order to preserve their own power-base and retain their own sense of superiority when dealing with the other morons around them. Regardless of anyone's comprehension of History, you all should be aware that the U.S.A. is doomed!
Since the success or failure of the surge exists entirely in the mind of Dick Cheney, as long as he thinks it's a success, it is. Republicans will simply echo whatever he says. So yes, the surge is effective. Yes it will always be effective. Statistics, observation, and analysis notwithstanding.
If the corporate media says it's a success, it must be true.
I see the hand of Iran in this. The Cheney ME visit was to prepare the rulers there for the NeoCON planned attack on Iran. Knowing that the complicite and cowardly congress won't do anything but hold hearings on bushCON, the Shite's are going to make the occupation so bloody and terrible for the US presence, that attacking Iran will look like an act of madmen in the face of all out war in Iraq, which will cost the US dearly.
That's just my take, FWIW.
Whatever we think of Bush's War, lets hope things don't unravel. Everyone needs a break. The Iraqis should "play nice" and give the occupation troops nothing to do but play softball and video games. Just so they don't sign over the oil. It is Iraq's.
The Surge is a highly successful publicity stunt and political maneuver. The reduced death toll is due to Muktada Al Sadr's ceasefire.
I hear the ceasefire just ended.
We have to wonder what is behind this upping of attacks on the Sahdrists. As reported some weeks ago in Juancole.com:
"A Sadrist member of parliament, Ahmad al-Masoudi (loyal to Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr), charged that the arrests of Sadrist leaders was intended to forestall a Sadrist victory in the October, 2008, provincial elections. He said that PM Nuri al-Maliki's Da'wa Party and his ally the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq were attempting to affect the course of the elections."
But al-Maliki obviously had to get permission from the US occupation and here the strange thing is that the ISCI is the most pro-Iranian group while the al-Sadr is rather anti-Iran. So why is the US supporting attacks on an anti-Iran group by a pro-Iran one when the US (by all accounts) is preparing to attack Iran?
Is it sheer incompetence? Or is there some deeper hidden agenda?
So !
CLASSIC MAO TZE TUNG'S STRATEGY "When the enemy is weak, we attack, when the enemy attacks we withdraw," the insurgent is like fish in wanter ! it thrives in its environment.
Moqtada Al Sadr is a canny Moa Tze Tung's student, and he has played his cards well. This so called "surge" is a mirage, there was never ever any "success" in this so called surge. Like so many of President Bush's spin, he lies in the face of facts, an incredible man so divorsed from reality like good ole Hitler in his last days when drugs induced so clouded his mind that he started to move whole armies of non existent soldiers over a thousand miles on the map to fight the next day at an imaginary front ! Poor President Bush still living in a world of fantasy !
From this point on attacks will be increased because the momentum has already gathered pace and the USA is mired in loss of morale and short of troops on the ground. This is time for counter attack. I must observe that Mokhtada has fought a beautiful Mao Tze Tung classic guerrilla war; fought on two front, the home front of the enemy by "surging" attacks at the enemy's weakest (election in USA and the Republican's need to contrive a victory by showing that troop level can be drawn down because of recent "success" and the second front on the ground (increased attacks in the green zone. Lovely timing ! Altogether beautiful !
(Cross-posted from another CD article)
The "surge" had 2 goals:
1) Political goal - to give Nouri al Maliki's government "breathing space" during which the Iraqi Govt. can advance the cause of sectarian reconciliation. Failed.
2) Military goal - to help Iraqis clear and secure neighborhoods, to help them protect the local population, and to help ensure that the Iraqi forces left behind are capable of providing the security that Baghdad needs (GWB, address to the nation 1/10/07). Failed.
A CDer commented that there is a third goal: Get the war off the front pages, and enable Bush (and McCain) to claim early and often that "we" were "winning," to blunt both the street protests and the moves, however weak, by Congress to try to shut the whole thing down. Success.
As I have remarked many times here at CD, and my predictions are coming true, as the weather warms in Baghdad, so too will violence, despite the presence of US troops. Violence will reach its peak as the Iraqis chase departing US troops (and contractors).
This whole quagmire will be over with very soon ...
... because our contractors/mercenaries will stop taking payments in US dollars.
"...they laid the foundations for peace for generations to come"
I'm sure that after Bush's America is broken up and sold off to pay for repairs and reparations there will be lasting peace on Earth.
Is 'success' of the US surge in Iraq about to unravel?
It was never 'RAVELED' in the first place. Nothng, absolutely nothing about this war and occupation of Iraq was ever legal, moral, necessary, or planned to protect America or promote democracy or freedom for the Iraqis.
It is insanity and the eventual cost will bring us down and we asked for it and we're still asking for it by not leaving and that includes leaving that Green Zone embassy complex, which is a stark reminder, set in concrete, of utter stupidity and insanity.
Sadr deflates Surge!
Iraq is hell and the surge is one of the seasons of hell-- a slight change of scenery, a costume change between acts. The Surge is part of the selling campaign, it's the 2007-8 model of the long stay in Iraq.
And we stay and stay. Why? The place would revert to chaos of we were to leave. Revert? Chaos is US. We stay because we broke the pottery and now we need to fix it. Fix it? Not in a million years. Asking the US to fix Iraq is like asking Michael Jackson to babysit your children. So we stay, for what? What does the place have of value? Oil. That's why we stay. Simple question: why don't we go to Darfur? Simple answer, No oil.
The surge will come and go. Next season there will be a new hope: perhaps Chalabi will return and bring peace. And then the denouement-Chabali summarily killed and revealed as a fraud and on and on, more plots, sub-plots and pipedreams which will last 50 more years when the oil will run out.
The British took over Iraq after the Ottomans were defeated in WWI. They needed oil for their fleet which was switching over to coal. British Pro-Council Gertrude Bell thought the Shias were not to be trusted so she went with the Sunnis. Churchill's RAF gassed the Kurds and after that everyone kept pretty much in line.
The country was turned over to CIA station chief Kermit Roosevelt (Teddy's grandson) in the 50's and the oil became US corporate property. Saddam nationalized the oil and tossed out the Enrons of the time. Bush tossed out Saddam and now we have chaos.
And now Sadr is rising..
A ghastly tale, I'm sure you'll agree.
Yes, one day people will look back and say this was the most glorious time in American history. Our great President Bush and his VP Cheney brought this country out of despair and built it into a thriving, respected, unified nation. All the world will tout America`s actions as an example of how wonderful life can be for all people everywhere.
Many imperial leaders throughout history have claimed that the "sacrifice" will be worth the effort as they tried, and often failed, to conquer the world.
Bush is confident in his actions because he sees a future Middle East that is based on market values and democracies that can be bought and sold by the highest bidder. Even if people share this goal of open markets and democracies in the Middle East, most of us can understand that war, violence, and illegal occupations are not the only strategy for achieving this goal.
Bush only wants to repeat the goal he is pursuing with no accountability for his miserable, illegal, violent, and arrogant strategies he employs.
Also, his goals sound good, but he has never been a big supporter of legitimate governments, fair markets, and healthy environments - even in his own country.
Sticking a finger in the dike may stop the flow of water, but it doesn't fix the problem.
The whole idea of the "surge" was to keep control while political progress was made. That didn't happen. Now the surge will become the escalation it was always intended to be.
If "success" is only measured by the number of US deaths, then maybe leaving Iraq would decease the number considerably, thus another mission accomplished and another "end of major combat operations" and tour of duties finally end, some now on their fifth. GWB, keep playing with military and iraqi lives like little toys until they are all broken, and daddy will put you back in your little room in Crawford. 01/20/09 and counting. How's the surge and benchmarks of success coming along?
The success of the Surge about to unravel? Never. At least not according to the cheney/bush administration or the MSM. They'll come up with something to show its success. "One family has water and electricity for an hour a day..."
For the real truth about how we got here, watch Frontline tonight - Part II of Bush's War. You won't learn much new (at least CD folks) but at least it's great to hear the real truth. It just needs to be repeated over and over, like the lies that led us into this mess. After watching, you'll wonder how these madmen (and condi) are still in power and not impeached.
Moqtada al Sadr's plan all along has been to wait out the surge. Well, Mission Accomplished. Now he can manuever himself into the job of Iraq's Ayatollah Khomeini.
Regarding the empire ending:
More than 75% of US industry is OWNED by overseas investors. The empire is not so much, the US government while they are part, nor the US military, again part, but is at the highest levels financial dominance globally.
This jerk W is going to promote some 'incident' at some politically convenient time to perfect his betrayal of America, just watch. What if the democrats can't have a nominee in place when that happens? Well, I guess Nancy Pelosi would have to lead the opposition from the speaker's podium. Meantime, we (us Dimocrats) are fiddling to a different tune altogether. Oh my gosh, Barack's pastor used strong language to describe his feelings about the on-going betrayal by those who speak and act in our name, while Hillary tries to rewrite her history as a symbolic hero as evidence of her experience in foreign affairs. Would she similarly pump up her reaction to the forth-coming 'incident' just to hype herself? Sure, and that's just what W would do, and in fact did. It's mere coincidence that all his cronies have lined up at the trough. What more of the same can we stand?
Bush is truly bizarre. How in the hell can his tormented logic conclude we ". . . laid the foundations for peace for generations to come."? The U.S. presence in Iraq has erased any semblance or peace in that tragic land, and is the continuing cause of the unrest that has become endemic there. We, and our pawn, Israel, have disturbed the entire Middle East for years, and virtually everything we do makes the situation worse, year after year. So much for "laying the foundations of peace . ."
Of course. As soon as the 'primitives' figured out what we liked, they attacked it. This whole war is a disgrace and only a disgrace.
How to cut the number of US deaths to "prove" the Surge is working-
less patrols, less engagement, keep troops in the Green zone playing video games, eating gourmet pies, wiping their hands on expensive monogrammed towels etc.
Do you think the Bush administration has made sure to keep as many men out of harms way as possible while maintaining the "look" of war in this election year? I do.
Do you think the enemy will incite more violence as November comes closer? Yes.
twalsh1 6:47pm
Never been in a situation like them ? What would you call the take over of the US ? An unelected
administration appointed by the Supreme Court who have consistently made up the rules as they went along the Constitution be damned and a Congress in collusion with them. While I'll grant all the bombimg and murder and mayhem isn't here.....who knows what is to come? The economy is and has been depleted which I further agree isn't equal to Depleted Uranium and its terrors, but there are similarities on a small scale between the two countries. The average citizens don't know what to do, or why or what the heck is going on.
SO.....SO.....SO....
IMPEACH AND PROSECUTE
Now Not Later and give both countries and the rest of the world the chance at life & sanity
How many times has George W Bush said things that turned out to be a complete lies?????? To many for me to remember. In fact, I can't remember anything he has ever said that didn't turn out to be a lie. This is why I don't believe the surge is working! It's just one more of Bush's fabrications to fool American's into buying a damaged bill of goods (Bush's War). He has no credibility left! Maybe when some reliable person other than a neocon tells me I will believe it. The only reason the surge has even half way worked he has paid the insurgents to stop fighting! Now that is what I call a military success??????? When you have to pay insurgents to stop fighting there is one big gigantic problem! One that isn't likely to ever be solved. Maybe he should learn to pay people he bribes to do his dirty work???? He stopped paying the nations phone bills so the telecoms cut off the spying! It's the same with insurgents. Why should they stop fighting when they aren't getting paid???? Pathetic!!!! This should tell American's something!
More like the entire bush presidency-along with conservative ideology-has come unraveled, hasn't it? Conservative politics just doesn't work.
It's a disaster for the economy, it's a disaster for the military, it's a disaster for the citizenry. Conservative politcs-just-doesn't-work. Period.
Yesterday for a while the online New York Times had a big headliine "4000 dead" with an American soldier and a huge Israeli flag behind him-wow, that was some honesty.
Front page NYT's star of david emblazened behind the lament "4000 dead" well, it was not news to Kristol Wolfowitz feith etc...all israeli citizens driving u.s. poriegn policy.
Cool. IDF. USMC. Same tanks. Gaza or Iraq, same goals...
You cannot win a guerrilla war. Like Nam, Cuba, Nicaragua we will be driven out.
Because very innocent person America slaughters has relatives who at that point become willing to die to avenge that death.
It is a calculus. Asymetrical? you bet ied's and new tricks to come as they LEARN.
Israel covets all the land between the Tigris and the Euphrates and we're fighting that war for them. But only American's don't get it. The Arab's we are killing 'get it' just fine; Zionist American death squads and bombs-
eff occupation of foreign lands. eff it.
We are marauding infidel Crusaders atticking Islam and will be driven from Mesopatamia.
A surge reversal now as a result of Sadrs Shia militia activity, linked to Iran, just as Cheney visits the region to sell an Iran war seems quite convenient to those wanting to do Iran. Hmm.
The stand down on August 29 served to reduce violence and lend credibility to claims the surge was working and get Iraq news off the MSM. This made it less of an issue in the election debates, and allowed McCain to be the Republican nominee, since even some Republicans were jumping ship on Iraq when things were bad. This allowed them divide and rule the Dems with non-issues like race, sex, religion, while Dems reversed course with the surge improvements and committed to pulling troops from Iraq (which will backfire if they get the country in a frenzy over a staged Iran attack). It also removed some of the heat on doing Iran then, as they were being blamed for the violence against US troops at the time.
Perhaps the stand down by Sadr was to protect Iran and prevent an excuse for an attack, even if it did benefit the neocons. Whats changed? Nothing.
One theory is Sadr is controlled somehow to do our bidding, or we are escalating the violence on our own with paid agents in order to blame Iran, or this is just another one of those coincidences for the Coincidence Theorists. Certainly Iran would not be behind the violence that could be blamed on them and be used as an excuse to bomb them, and if Sadr were close to Iran he would not want that either. Maybe Sadr simply knows what we don't, that Iran being bombed is a done deal now, their standing down or not, so the stand down is over and score some wins, nothing to lose, except providing your enemy a good excuse to attack your friend. Makes no sense to me.
It is very interesting we let Ahmadinejad, President of the country we say is reponsible for attacks on Americans, go in and out of Baghdad earlier in the month without arranging an accident. Instead, we provide the security to protect him. Of course, if he were killed in Iraq, it would be hard to get support for bombing him in Iran, since we must have a demon to attack, someone we can call Hitler, like Saddam.
One thing is for certain. I do not see Iran having a suicide wish. I do not believe they want to trigger instability in Iraq. They know as well as we do that government does not give a GD what it's own citizens think (as Cheney said, "so?"), nor do they care how many US troops get killed (as Cheney said, "they volunteered"), and that instability in Iraq will do nothing to get us out of Iraq (as Cheney says privately "its the oil stupid"). We are in Iraq until the oil goes dry. Big Oil needs someone to protect them, and we do not charge for our services, paid for by the citizen sucker and those who loan us money. In the future Big oil will explore, pump, ship, while we offer protection.
Gen Betrayus is saying the Qud forces are beind the rocket attacks on the Green Zone. Funny how those rockets never seem to do much damage, makes you wonder. Again, I doubt Iran wants to give us an excuse to bomb them, and are aware we are permanent residents in Iraq. An unfriendly neighbour perhaps, but Saddam was too.