Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
- Accidentally Released - and Incredibly Embarrassing - Documents Show How Goldman et al Engaged in 'Naked Short Selling'
- Apocalypse Fairly Soon: The Moment of Truth in Europe
- NDAA's 'Indefinite Detention' Provisions Unconstitutional, says Judge
- Preying on Poverty: How Government and Corporations Use the Poor as Piggy Banks
- Associated Press Calls Out Romney's Lies in 'Prairie Fire' Speech
- Accidentally Released - and Incredibly Embarrassing - Documents Show How Goldman et al Engaged in 'Naked Short Selling'
- The Rise of the New Economy Movement
- Preying on Poverty: How Government and Corporations Use the Poor as Piggy Banks
- The Organic Watergate: Alarming Report Reveals USDA's Cozy Relationship with Corporate Agribusinesses in 'Organics'
- Updated: Under Pressure, TED Releases 'Income Inequality' Talk
Popular content
Today's Top News
From 'War Criminal' to 'Statesman'
An Italian restaurant in the Irish village of Dalkey caused quite a kerfuffle when it opened a few months ago. It is called Benito's and - yes - it is indeed named after Il Duce. And there are Italian fascist newspaper front pages on the wall to remind you just how bravely his men fought in the Second World War. A 1941 cover of La Domenica del Corriere carries a dramatic painting of six RAF Hurricanes crashing into the rooftops of Malta after vainly taking on the Italian air force. On another front page of the same year, four frightened British Tommies - a few of the 19,000 captured in the siege of Tobruk - surrender to black-feathered Bersaglieri troops at Sollum on the Egyptian-Libyan border.
It's not a joke. A relative of the owner was an Italian air force officer in the Western Desert and there are archive photographs, too, on the wall. A handsome young airman is surrounded by photos of sand encampments and of the nose of an Italian fighter aircraft. (For Independent aero-buffs, it appears to be a Macchi C.200 Saetta ("Arrow"), in service with 372 Squadron in Cyrenaica - part of Libya - in 1941.) At Benito's, the pizzas are great and the chocolate cakes positively ooze. Good old "Eyeties", as the Eighth Army probably said after capturing their 20,000 Italian prisoners at El-Alamein in 1942.
Now I know that, compared with the epic cruelty of Hitler and Stalin, "Musso" was a softy. The Italian armies of Europe's first fascist leader lost in Albania, lost in Greece and lost in North Africa. He ended the war strung upside down in a Milan piazza alongside his glamorous mistress after creating the last-ditch Republic of Salo, a state as ridiculous in its pretensions as the Italian dictator himself.
But in 1935, Mussolini invaded and occupied Haile Selassie's Abyssinia after using poison gas to capture the country. He sent his forces to fight on Franco's side in the Spanish civil war. "Musso" was an unashamed anti-Semite; his anti-racial laws were administered by a raving Jew-hater called Giovanni Preziosi and the Duce was too frightened of Hitler to prevent thousands of Italian Jews from being deported to their death by the Nazis. Indeed, he sometimes gave orders that they should be. His Italian fascists, along with the Germans, jointly operated an extermination camp at San Sabba near Trieste. Churchill, who called him "a swine", once sarcastically noted that Mussolini had proclaimed himself the "protector of Islam" while having fewer Muslims under his protection than Britain. In fact, "Musso" deported 80,000 Arabs from their homes in Libya to make way for Italian "settlements", and executed the courageous rebel leader Omar el-Mukhtar after a war in which 200,000 Muslims were slaughtered. In other words, Benito was a very nasty piece of work.
But wait. When he ended Italy's crisis of strikes and revolution in the 1920s, Churchill himself admitted to being "charmed ... by his gentle and simple bearing and by his calm, detached poise in spite of so many burdens and dangers ... anyone could see that he thought of nothing but the lasting good ... of the Italian people". Even a few years before the war, Churchill was to write: "Many people in Britain admired the work which the extraordinary man Signor Mussolini had done for his country. He had brought it ... into a position of dignity and order, which was admired even by those who regretted the suspension of Italian freedom." Mussolini thus started off as a European hero, became a fascist beast, but is now regarded as just a bumbling buffoon, the sort of harmless court jester whose name can grace an Italian restaurant in Ireland.
But there is nothing exclusive about this sort of transmogrification. Back in 1986, I recall, Ronald Reagan called the "terrorist" Colonel Muammar Gaddafi "the Mad Dog of the Middle East". But two decades after the Americans bombed Libya (with Margaret Thatcher's help), Jack Straw called him "statesmanlike" for giving up nuclear ambitions which were as mythical as Saddam's. Reagan himself was widely regarded as a "warmonger" until he visited China and turned into an old buffer who muddled up his White House cue cards and died in a fog of gentle memories from the Washington commentariat.
Arafat was a "super-terrorist" in 1980s Beirut before turning into a "super-statesman" after Oslo and then a "superterrorist" again before he died. Stalin went through the same epic transition. From being the vicious communist dictator of the 1920s and 1930s, he became "Uncle Joe" after 1941 - personally awarded the sword of Stalingrad by Churchill for killing Nazis - before reverting to Soviet arch-tyrant, Churchill himself complaining in 1953 of Stalin's "bludgeoning xenophobia".
It happens all the time, this little mis-step in our appreciation of human beasts. Kurt Waldheim started off as a nasty little Wehrmacht intelligence officer working for war criminal General Löhr's Army Group E in Bosnia. Then he turned into a highly respected UN Secretary-General before being maligned by his respectful colleagues the moment his murky wartime past was revealed. Slobodan Milosevic was a brute until he turned up in the United States to negotiate a Bosnian peace at Dayton, Ohio, when he became a "statesman" - only to be tried as a war criminal after Kosovo.
This transformation happens to whole races of people. The plucky little Serbs of the Second World War became the Nazi "ethnic cleansers" of 1993. The heroic Muslim "freedom fighters" killing Russians in Afghanistan in 1980 became the freedom-hating "terrorists" killing Americans in Afghanistan in 2001 and 2002 and 2003 and 2004 and 2005 and 2006 and 2007 and 2008...
I think all this twaddle has a lot to do with journalism as well as political opportunism. Told that progressive Colonel Nasser had become the thief of Suez, we turned him into the "Mussolini of the Nile"; just as our old mate Saddam Hussein was helped into power as Iraqi "strongman" by the CIA, supplied with US and British military assistance after his atrocious invasion of Iran, but was then dubbed the "Hitler of Baghdad" after his atrocious invasion of Kuwait, his use of gas and ... you know the rest. First we set him up. In the end, we hanged him.
Our own dear Anthony Blair will not be hanged for war crimes, of course. But who can say for sure that he will not make an equally speedy transition through the political-military firmament. From an initially much-loved prime minister, he became an arrogant, messianic liar who sent Britons off to die in an illegal war. Chances are, however, that he will turn out to be the devout - and extremely wealthy - peace-loving envoy who wins the Nobel Peace prize. Who knows, in a few years' time, I may be slipping into Tony's for a pizza and a chocolate cake that positively oozes.
--Robert Fisk
© 2008 independent.co.uk

37 Comments so far
Show AllFisk's article illustrates the challenge of public dialog. Will we have complete, objective portraits of people, events and things, from which to build our enlightened public policy, or will we continue to skew the data to fit our gladiator agendas?
Interesting and entertaining article, although I don't know if everything Fisk says is true. One part I wonder about is Slobodan Milosevic, whether he ever really was a fascist, ... wicked, etc. Western news media described him that way, in their dutiful unethical journalism for the ruling elites of imperialist-West; and many other people may also demonise parts of former Pres. Milosevic's political history. However, I critically [need] proof, and don't know that Fisk has ever provided any on Pres. Milosevic.
Most of the others he names are people whose stories, as Fisk briefly refers to them, are adequately familiar to me. I just wonder about Pres. Milosevic.
And with that said, my main point of posting is with respect to the closing paragraph about how Tony Blair may be treated. I agree that it's likely enough that he may become a Nobel "Peace" Prize winner, or candidate anyway, and that the yellow-spined "journalists" of the world will pump up this propaganda. However, there's something very, very different today, from the past.
WE HAVE INTERNET, while people even 15 years ago rarely owned a PC, and virtually no one used the Internet in the primitive form that it could be used prior to the Web interface being developed and made available, which I believe happened around 1993.
It's why, f.e., I can't really but superficially compare the massive support "Americans" gave for the war on Iraq with the strong enough support Germans gave Hitler. They did NOT have even a fraction of the ability that we have for getting informed and from sources worldwide, that we have today. WE therefore are much more guilty when we support wars of aggression, political lies, etc.
When the day comes that people start to even promote schmucks and war criminals like Blair, Bush, Cheney, etcetera, for the NPP or any respectable title, then there'll be plenty of us who'll be ready to attack this hypocrisy, fiendishness, ....
People who are guilty today pretend that they're not worse than predecessors, but it's a lie; because they didn't have access to mass communication, while we do. The guilty today are the guiltiest in [all] of human history, therefore.
This is Fisk at his snarky best !! Who knows ... maybe our very own tyrants Dick&Bush may have a pub named after them in Dublin ... Bush&Dicks Ale House.
The "Dick and Bush" Pub. :) I'm trying to picture the old style sort of medieval sign for the place ... you know the ones that used pictures instead of words since the clientele couldn't read. :)
I'd like to move there and open a restaurant named "Antonio's".
Great article. Reading it, I was coming up with still more instances of this: South Vietnam's Ngo Diem, Chile's Pinochet, and then Iran, Ethiopia, and many places in Latin America and Africa ...and now Russia's a collective bad guy again. Seems we've done this with every spot on the map but West Europe in the last century.
Any bets on how soon a US president orders bombers to target Hamid Karzai? Or Pervez Musharaf? Or the government we're now setting up in Baghdad? I'll guess 7, 3, and 10 years, respectively.
Where, Oh Where is such an American pundit such as Fisk when we need her/him?
The public has been well conditioned by Hollywood to respond to characterizations of "good guys" (us) and "bad guys"(them). No deeper analysis is needed.
Committing atrocities is easy when you do it to bad guys because they deserve it.
riddimboy and COMARC--thanks for a great laugh.
Hmmm... the Dick in the Bush pub and takeout ...
Read John Ralston Saul's "Voltaire's Bastards." Napoleon was a nasty little dictator who ruined continental Europe, but today you can find his revered portrait hanging in many places. And Bush models himself after him.
History's Treadmill
Mount the treadmill of history's take
to enjoy the snipe of the snake
or a break in the past aggregate
as the nobles of yore name the saloons of yon
from a Gore to a Dick
a little shuffle may do the trick
from a warmonger to a peacemaker
from a marked man to a marks man
from a tyrant to a statesman
do the treadmill for history's sake
to endure the snipe of the snake
Will Old Glory even give a lick
or become timeless like a pre tick
Stilba: everywhere EXCEPT Western Europe? What about the kerfuffle about France (which has now regained its "statesman" status, thanks to a quickly-divorced-and-even-more-quickly-remarried good-looking leader)? And as Bob Dylan sang, "We forgave the Germans and then we were friends. . . ."
If the media would stop adopting talking-points adjectives and just describe what people do and say, it would save having to rewrite the adjectives later when the wheel turns.
Let us not forget how Henry Kissinger and Richard Nixon were elevated to the status of Elder Statesmen (reportedly the Shrub still consults with Henry the K) in spite of actions that if performed by most national leaders would have resulted in war crimes tribunals.
Right you are Betsy ...guess West Europe's right under my nose, so to speak.
How about a Dick & Dubya's Bsr-B-Que in Baghdad with pictures of Abu Ghraib, Falujah, and L Paul Bremmer gracing its dining area and Charley Danliels Band, Merele Hagard, and Lee Greenwood singing "God Bless the USA" on the intercom.
Poet, that's about as likely as that street named after
Bush in Baghdad.....how's that coming by the way?
"Now I know that, compared with the epic cruelty of Hitler and Stalin, "Musso" was a softy. The Italian armies of Europe's first fascist leader lost in Albania, lost in Greece and lost in North Africa. He ended the war strung upside down in a Milan piazza alongside his glamorous mistress after creating the last-ditch Republic of Salo, a state as ridiculous in its pretensions as the Italian dictator himself."
I'd love to see George Wanker Bush hung upside down at a gas station in Texas. Instead of Clara Petacci in blue stockings hanging next to him . . . it could be Condoleeza Rice . . . or Cheney (better yet).
As zoya says,read John Ralston Sauls'Voltaires Bastards on Napoleons destructive march thru Europe and his rapid elevation to sainthood soon after.Voltaires Bastards explains the reasons for the disfunctual world we live in to-day.It should be prescribed reading in all schools,in all countries.
It has to do with the size of the donation/baksheesh the leader is willing to make to the US or Britain. A cheapie or refuser isa terrorist/dictator/new hitler; and once he's forked over the state's resource rights and a few boatloads of the green and crinkly, he's a statesman.
Nothing could be simpler. Law of the Gang.
Chances are, however, that he will turn out to be a Catholic.
Being German I dutifully read through half of this diatribe. But when the author listed the supposed concessions, including reparations and complete German disarmament as offered by Hitler I realized I had been wasting my time.
The truth about WW 2 must be told or this world will have more wars.Progressives can't do it,and conservatives certainly won't.Ever wonder why historians in Continental Europe,Canada,and Australia are jailed for open debate?Winston Churchill and his backers wanted war.It broke the British Empire for good and killed millions."It's cruel to be kind""We will make EXTERMINATING Attacks ON GeRMAN CITIES."I ENJOYED EVERY MINUTE OF IT"(After the war)See Nichloson Brady's book Human Smoke.Are some of the drunken,demented comments of the 'great man'Churchill,hero of Bush,Thatcher,and The neo-conservatives,plus some liberals gets a pass because of the crimes of the Axis.Unless WW1 and 2 history is told truthfully,without rancor,and the good and evil propaganda,and placed into the context of those times.there will be more Bush's looking to be the next:Winston Churchill.
Hmm,
Spartacuss @ 7:00pm = 3,680 words.
Was that a post...
-or a book?
ok so there is a lot of bull s$it coming from ALL the warmongers.. as history repeats itself over and over NO ONE LEARNS..
Hey, American Buddies, sounds like the kind of guys you'd like to rub shoulders and have a beer with, eh?
And how 'bout that Pope, huh? What a guy! Hitler Youth and all that. How's your Catholicism working for you? But don't listen to me. By all means, Listen to Il Papa!
Suckers!
Bush and Cheney should open a restaurant. It could be called The Cock and Bullseye! Or how about Prickles?
www.dangerouscreation.com
Hey, Spartacus . . . Sieg Heil, Mo Fo. Wir werden all die Juden vernichten, nicht Wahr? Ausgezeichnet, meine Damen und Herren! Heute Bush . . . Morgen McCain. Arbeit Macht Frei . . . und auch sehr todt.
If Bush and Cheney open a restaurant, will they serve Freedom Fries?
The media of truth , mouthpieces of the ministry of truth, make appellations and slogans that best used by the spectators of a football match. Whoever the opposing side is , some evil name and persona abuse can be hurled. Whoever ones own team is, all tactics in persuit of victory are forgiven, whatever the cost to external groups of human beings. The name calling is supposed to justify the crime, or to hang the criminal. Its all the same. Once the leader in a violent conflict, all bets on good conduct are off.
Sparticus: I enjoyed reading your history and have no doubt that if a few things had gone differently history would be written with a totally opposite view. To the victor, goes the right to revise history, true, but, I would be interested to hear your take on how the Zionist conspiracy got Stalin on board? Despite all the propaganda Hitler's war, or as you would have us believe the war of the Zionist Jews, was won or lost because of the Russians and the Eastern Front. So, Curchill, Stalin and Hitler, nice guys, not really, but was Stalin bought too, according to your reading?
If the Dick and Bush pub serves a chocolate cake that positively oozes, it'll be oozing blood.
I doubt it'll have a very expansive menu, though. For the last seven+ years all they've served is a chicken and beef concoction known as "cock-and-bull." With the bull's leavings as garnish.
Mordechai Shiblikov , as yet another "merican" that is monolingual (a good thing if you're a Minuteman, in jest of course), please translate!!! Spartacus - wow!!!, but as stated earlier, to the victors go the spoils, but your posting just illustrates and confirms what all the CD'ers know....war is horrific nasty brutal action to be avoided at all costs.
I totally agree with Spartacus about Churchill being a fat, nasty rat but i havent read enough about WW2 to comment on the rest. I do know that a lot of occupied countries at that time (british empire !!) hated the british more than the germans. For people in the asian subcontinent anything english evoked the same response as anything nazi to the western europeans. What shocks me is how easily the british, smug imperialists themselves managed to demonize the germans and come off as morally superior !!
Just another example of Churchill's callas indifference to loss of life and his capacity for treachery goes back to the entry of the US to WWI when he is at least suspected of conspiring if not causing the sinking of the Lusitanian, at least he effectively did nothing to prevent it.
The Lusitania was a famous passenger liner built by Qunard in 1907. She had a top speed of 26.7 knots, with a service speed of 25 knots, and was designed to transport up to 2,198 passengers. In 1907, she won the Blue Ribbon for fastest transit between New York and Britain. She was sunk by a German torpedo off the coast of Ireland. Of the 1,969 persons aboard the ship, only 774 survived; for weeks after the event, bodies would wash ashore along the Irish coast. 128 American citizens lost their lives, including Alfred Vanderbilt (millionaire businessman), Anna Marjory Allan and Gwendolyn Allan (daughters of wealthy businessman H. Montagu Allan), Justus Forman (author and playwright), and Frederick Stark Pearson (engineer and entrepreneur).
Churchill rethink Part 2,
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/raico-churchill2.html
"Whether Churchill actually arranged for the sinking of the Lusitania on May 7, 1915, is still unclear. A week before the disaster, he wrote to Walter Runciman, President of the Board of Trade that it was "most important to attract neutral shipping to our shores, in the hopes especially of embroiling the United States with Germany." Many highly-placed persons in Britain and America believed that the German sinking of the Lusitania would bring the United States into the war."
Conspiracy or not it was much like 9-11, a crucial event that turned the tide of history and war. The sinking of the Lusitania made it possible to completely change American public opinion that had been to that point in main anti war and pro Kaiser, to after that point, anti-German and Pro-War.
BTW Lucitania is the Spanish/Latin spelling for Lusitania. It means land of light and is the name given by the Romans to a Celtic tribe from the area of northern Portugal/ Galicia. The name is also given to a magnificent local race/bread of horse. The Lucitanian/Lusitanian http://www.josefonteslusitanos.com/Lusitano-Horses-Photo-Gallery.htm
The CommonDreams administration should be ashamed to have allowed the antisemitic, pro-Nazi ravings of "spartacus", above, to remain visible, without official comment for days.