EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- The Biggest Criminal Enterprise in History
- Exclusive: Why I Spoke Out at Obama's Foreign Policy Speech
- Get Apocalyptic: Why Radical is the New Normal
- Think Fracking Is Bad? Wait Until You Hear about the Gas Industry's "Acid Jobs"
- Over a Million Signatures in Support for Sen. Warren's Student Loan Bill
Popular content
Today's Top News
World's Best-Known Protest Symbol Turns 50
It started life as the emblem of the British anti-nuclear movement but it has become an international sign for peace, and arguably the most widely used protest symbol in the world. It has also been adapted, attacked and commercialized.
It had its first public outing 50 years ago on a chilly Good Friday as thousands of British anti-nuclear campaigners set off from London's Trafalgar Square on a 50-mile march to the weapons factory at Aldermaston.
The demonstration had been organised by the Direct Action Committee Against Nuclear War (DAC) and the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) joined in.
Gerald Holtom, a designer and former World War II conscientious objector from West London, persuaded DAC that their aims would have greater impact if they were conveyed in a visual image. The "Ban the Bomb" symbol was born.
He considered using a Christian cross motif but, instead, settled on using letters from the semaphore - or flag-signalling - alphabet, super-imposing N (uclear) on D (isarmament) and placing them within a circle symbolizing Earth.
The sign was quickly adopted by CND.
Holtom later explained that the design was "to mean a human being in despair" with arms outstretched downwards.
US peace symbol
American pacifist Ken Kolsbun, who corresponded with Mr Holtom until his death in 1985, says the designer came to regret the connotation of despair and had wanted the sign inverted.
"He thought peace was something that should be celebrated," says Mr Kolsbun, who has spent decades documenting the use of the sign. "In fact, the semaphore sign for U in 'unilateral' depicts flags pointing upwards. Mr Holtom was all for unilateral disarmament."
In a book to commemorate the symbol's 50th birthday, Mr Kolsbun charts how it was transported across the Atlantic and took on additional meanings for the Civil Rights movement, the counter-culture of the 1960s and 70s including the anti-Vietnam protests, and the environmental, women's and gay rights movements.
He also argues that groups opposed to those tendencies tried to use the symbol against them by distorting its message.
How the sign migrated to the US is explained in various ways. Some say it was brought back from the Aldermaston protest by civil rights activist Bayard Rustin, a black pacifist who had studied Gandhi's techniques of non-violence.
Vietnam
In Peace: The biography of a symbol, Mr Kolsbun describes how in just over a decade, the sign had been carried by civil rights "freedom" marchers, painted on psychedelic Volkswagens in San Francisco, and on the helmets of US soldiers on the ground in Vietnam.
"The sign really got going over here during the 1960s and 70s, when it became associated with anti-Vietnam protests," he told the BBC News website.
As the combat escalated, he says, so did the anti-war protests and the presence of the symbol.
"This, of course, led some people to condemn it as a communist sign," says Mr Kolsbun. "There has always been a lot of misconception and disinformation about it."
As the sign became a badge of the burgeoning hippie movement of the late 1960s, the hippies' critics scornfully compared it to a chicken footprint, and drew parallels with the runic letter indicating death.
In 1970, the conservative John Birch Society published pamphlets likening the sign to a Satanic symbol of an upside-down, "broken" cross.
While it remained a key symbol of the counter-culture movement throughout the 1970s, it returned to its origins in the 1980s, when it became the banner of the international grassroots anti-nuclear movement.
Power
The real power of the sign, its supporters say, is the reaction that it provokes - both from fans and from detractors.
The South African government, for one, tried to ban its use by opponents of apartheid In 1973.
And, in 2006, a couple in suburban Denver found themselves embroiled in a dispute over their use of a giant peace sign as a Christmas wreath. The homeowners' association threatened them with a daily fine if they didn't remove it.
The association eventually backed down because of public pressure, but a member told a local newspaper it was clearly an "anti-Christ sign" with "a lot of negativity associated with it.".
Commercial
CND has never registered the sign as a trademark, arguing that "a symbol of freedom, it is free for all". It has now appeared on millions of mugs, T-shirts, rings and nose-studs. Bizarrely, it has also made an appearance on packets of Lucky Strike cigarettes.
A decade ago, the sign was chosen during a public vote to appear on a US commemorative postage stamp saluting the 1960s.
The symbol that helped define a generation of baby boomers may not be as widely used today as in the past. It is in danger of becoming to many people a retro fashion item, although the Iraq war has seen it re-emerge with something like its original purpose.
"It is still the dominant peace sign," argues Lawrence Wittner, an expert on peace movements at the University at Albany in New York.
"Part of that is down to its simplicity. It can be used as a shorthand for many causes because it can be reproduced really quickly - on walls on floors, which is important, in say, repressive societies."
And can its success be measured? Fifty years on, wars have continued to be waged and the list of nuclear-armed states has steadily lengthened.
But the cup is half-full as well as half empty.
"There are many ways in which nuclear war has been prevented," says Mr Wittner. "The hawks say that the reason nuclear weapons have not been used is because of the deterrent. But I believe popular pressure has restrained powers from using them and helped curbed the arms race.
And the symbol of and inspiration for that popular pressure, says Mr Wittner, is Mr Holtom's graphic.
Peace: A biography of a symbol is published by National Geographic Books in April.
© 2008 BBC News
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

21 Comments so far
Show AllWe had a great demonstration outside the Federal Building in Downtown Tampa yesterday.
It was very upbeat and peaceful and not one instance of fighting or arguing even.
About 2 hundred of us just stood near the curb and gave the good old peace sign and messages to the passing Rush hour and from the faces in the cars I would say that the vast majority greeted us with smiles or even victory peace signs and thumbs up.
Of the thousands of cars only about ten or so gave us the finger, thumbs down or one guy yelled "Get a life!".
The media was there and were friendly as well as the cops and the Folks working in the Federal building watched and smiled too.
Lots of young folks and many were drawing peace messages on a large boarded black wall on behind the sidewalk opposite the Federal building…
Most of the chanting was the usual "NO Blood for Oil" I suggested "NO MORE BLOOD FOR BUSH"…
Maybe next time… we cannot be defeated united or divided and that is why this is such a long time struggle.
I love odoco's local ad action too.
We went out to Four Green Fields, a great Irish Bar and restaurant after the rally…
It was a great demonstration…. not real big but these days less is more if you know what I mean.
"This World will be saved by millions of small things" Pete Seeger
we need 50 years of peace!
long live the peace sign.
Interesting piece. My recollection is that the '06 homeowners association incident was in Pagosa Springs, Colorado, in the Southwest corner of the state.
Nuclear weapons enjoy the lowest level of mission buy-in at our national laboratories that they ever have. 80% of the American public wants to see total disarmament. In spite of this the NNSA is pushing forward with plans for a new generation of nuclear weapons, including plans for a huge new investment in infrastructure.
The same people who support this massive invesment in nuclear weapons also support a massive investment in nuclear power. Neither will make us more secuure and both have myriad unresolved (unresolvable?) proliferation and environmental issues.
A skeptical Congress needs to hear from its constituants that we have higher national priorities. A massive public investment in concentration solar wpould put more capacity on the ground operating in a fraction of the time it would take to bring a new generation nuclear albatroses on-line, and creae thousands of good jobs to boot.
Slience now will have with very high consequences far into the future.
Peter Neils, LOS ALMOS STUDY GROUP
www.lasg.org
Interestingly, buttons adorning the peace sign during the 1958 Easter march from London to Aldermaston were made of fired porcelain, symbolizing that clay would be among the few human artifacts to survive a nuclear inferno.
A fascinating cultural perspective of the peace symbol is available at http://incogrito.blogspot.com/2008/03/peace-de-rsistance.html
I am very grateful to the peace symbol and am glad its everywhere now.
It really makes a statement. further keen to see what new symbol might appear, as
'old faithful' now carries a bit stigma, is seen as quaint,
and is too easily seen as divisive. We moved from chanting 'Peace', a concept which could be ripped apart by pragmatists and 'realists', to intelligent slogans like 'War is not the answer'. That makes people think.
As it says here, even the designer apparently had some misgivings for the actual efficacy of the 'peace symbol' to evoke the requisite emotions. It has served
us well and may continue to do so, but in the spirit of progress
a net forum was created on the peace sign's birthday back
in february for brain/heartstorming the requisite elements of a new symbol.
Its on the sit of the Alcatraz Conversion Project in SF.
There's some interesting ideas posted there already, really makes you think.
Everyone welcome, and also feel free to post informational links there, as people have here. we want to give perspective and make it educational and sage.
Do consider joining in the discussion if you've got something to say...
http://www.alcatraz.nu/free_alcatraz/Forum/Forum.html
Peace
Nuclear War prevents itself.
War is business and business would become very bad following Nuclear war, particularly among nations with many nuclear devices.
Nobody wants that, especially those chosen by God to be eternally prosperous as they replace obsolete and/or expended kill-people equipment and machinery.
66% of voters would be comfortable with McCain. 66%!!! The American people are hopeless. Vote for the best candidate and let the chips fall where they may. The dem strategy is failing, they should not be rewarded. Let them lose for failing to satisfy the progressive wing. The democrats do not deserve to win. They tried to pander to the people and they are going to be rejected again. They are simply useless. At least the Repubs stand for something, no matter how repugnant.
If the American people were any good at all McCain wouldn't stand a chance and neither would any other Republican. McCain will be the next President, confirming that the people are no good at all. Americans are not electing a President, they are electing a commander in chief. Yes folks, the people are still in love with war. Nothing at all has changed. Live with that.
Yes JD,
Most ironic that the BIG ONE is what scares the War Machine more than anything. It would end the Business of War ....No more power,food, Banks, or people....
If Iran had the big one we wouldn't be hearing so many scary worries about a war with Iran.
Our two governments would be talking seriously to each other about avoiding Mutually Assured Destruction.
Maybe the UFO's have been in the background to save us from ourselves.
If they wanted to eliminate us, all they would have to do is a simulated cluster of incoming missles from Russia or the USA and it would be all over.
But If they are out there they have probably been around before Humans and would like to preserve this rare beautiful little Planet.
Lizard,
I like to predict too and even bet on it.
If you want a friendly wager on McCain, get in touch Jimglover@verizon.net
As I recall from my general sixties culture, the peace symbol we know was devised by Bertrand Russell. I'm surprised the article doesn't mention this, but I bet a search would offer the whole story right away. ( I am unwilling to check facts myself or to provide a link. )
I was going down another track. I was picturing the peace symbol as a tree with roots. The roots are prominent because they're the important part of the tree.
Ghawar March 20th, 2008 4:58 pm
If you do a google of peace sign or peace symbol you'll get a whole mess of hits (Results 1 - 10 of about 15,500,000 for peace sign) and most of them named Gerald Holtom as the creator just as this article indicates.
What I find more interesting is that you say "( I am unwilling to check facts myself or to provide a link. )"
What's up with that?
"You don't care what the American people think?" Raddatz asked.
"No," Cheney replied.
That says it all and whoever wins in Nov will say the same thing because the American people let Cheney say it and go unpunished.
America is less "free" than Cuba ; at least most Cubans agree for the most part with the Castros.
Mr.Glover: Thank you for the offer. I am not a gambling man. I hate the feeling of losing money on being wrong. I don't mind being wrong but I feel stupid losing money at it. Plus I hope I'm wrong so I would be betting against my hope.
Thanks Lizard,
Here is a bunch of photos of our rally in Florida and more http://5yearsofwar.com/
"What I find more interesting is that you say "( I am unwilling to check facts myself or to provide a link. )"
What's up with that?" --coldwarbaby47
--I had to pee. I'll check now, maybe it was Linus Pauling. Can you hold for a moment? --
Yes, it was Bertrand Russell:
in 1955, he and Albert Einstein released the Russell-Einstein Manifesto, which called for the abolition of nuclear weapons. He helped found and became the first president of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) in 1958. That year, he commissioned an artist to design a peace symbol for an anti-nuclear march CND was organizing. That symbol would become the icon of the 60's anti-war movement and continues to be the internationally recognized symbol of peace.
http://www.cultureofpeace.com/heroes/russell-bio.htm
I also learned in reading this link that Russell was not an Englishman as I always thought, but Welsh, like me.
As a young boy, isolated in a tiny town and growing up among rednecks and Christians, I found solace in privacy and reading. The books of Bertrand Russsell fascinated me and instilled in me a deep respect for culture and the advance of civilization. Like me, Russell would be horrified by the present United States.
peasegrn wrote:
"The same people who support this massive invesment in nuclear weapons also support a massive investment in nuclear power."
That is nonsense, based on the "if b implies a, then a inplies b" fallacy.
Many of us despise nucler weapons, yet believe that nuclear power, must have a place among the things we pursue to halt catastrophic climate change.
The arrogant Mad Dog of War Dick Cheney doesn't give a hoot what the American people want as proven by his smart-aleck answer when told by the reporter that 70% of the American people want the war in Iraq to end --- and he said "So?"
Cheney also "No" when asked if he cares what the American people want. Do we need more proof that we are living under fascist rulership and do not have democracy in the United States??! It's interesting no one holds him accountable for his statement. Apparently Congress agrees with him.
Burn in Hell, Cheney, along with Bush, Rice, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Perle, Powell, and all the rest of the lying war criminals who pushed for the attack and occupation of Iraq.
Tell me sompin' nu when was the last time a "leader" gave a rat's a__ about what the peons wanted not Ceaser, not Ghengis Khan, not Napolean,not any of the Louis', Henrys', Richards', Edwards' or Williams. not Washington, not FDR, Stalin, Hitler nor Churchill, certainly not lke,JFK,LBJ, Nixon, Raygun,Bubba,nor Bubby so why is there surprise when these dorks don't care either. The current Golden Rule is
" Hesoever gotha the Gold rules."
"You don't care what the American people think?" Raddatz asked.
"No," Cheney replied.
In a republic, sovereignty resides in the people. (whom representatives represent) This statement by a Vice President of a republic is treason, pure and simple.