Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Obama Speech Aims to End Race Row with Bold Plea for Harmony
PHILADELPHIA — In a breathtaking speech, delivered before a backdrop of American flags, Barack Obama attempted yesterday to lance the boil of the ugly racial row that threatens to destroy his campaign for the presidency. Delivering what one commentator described as the most personal and extensive discussion of the legacy of slavery made by any major American politician in memory, he said it was time for Americans to "move beyond some of our old racial wounds".
Commentators were quick to describe the unconventional speech, which Obama finished writing at 3am yesterday, as the most audacious and politically risky gambit of his career.
Saying he was "married to a black American who carries within her the blood of slaves and slaveowners - an inheritance we pass on to our two precious daughters," he implicitly rebuked those who question his wife Michelle's patriotism, after she recently said "for the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country".
Mr Obama said: "I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every hue, scattered across three continents, and for as long as I live," he said, "I will never forget that in no other country on earth is my story even possible."
Speaking near the spot where the US Declaration of Independence was written in the spring of 1787, Mr Obama took his theme from that iconic document, saying he wanted to transform the divisiveness of the race row into a quest for "a more perfect union".
In so doing, he unambiguously condemned the racially incendiary remarks of his Chicago pastor, the Rev Jeremiah Wright, saying they were "not only wrong, but divisive; divisive at a time when we need unity".
Snippets of some sermons are being endlessly looped on American television and on YouTube, showing Mr Wright describing the US as a racist country with a murderous foreign policy and a corrupt government.
The two most damaging video clips show Mr Wright claiming that the US brought the 9/11 attacks on itself and that blacks should sing "God Damn" not "God Bless America".
Mr Obama, frequently interrupted by applause, provided his most complete explanation of his long association with Mr Wright, the pastor who married him and baptised his children, despite his fiery rhetoric. "Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes.
"Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely - just as I'm sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed."
But even as he condemned the remarks of his friend and spiritual adviser, the Illinois senator delivered some home truths about race relations in America.
Throughout the election Mr Obama has tried to avoid embroiling his campaign in America's fractious racial debate, despite the efforts of his opponents to do so. In South Carolina at the beginning of the year, Bill Clinton was widely criticised for casting Obama as no more than a black candidate, popular in a state with a heavily black electorate but not a serious contender for the presidency.
And, earlier this month, Geraldine Ferraro, the 1984 Vice-Presidential nominee, was forced to leave Clinton's finance committee after saying that Obama was front-runner because as a black man he was enjoying political favouritism.
But yesterday - facing the Wright furore deemed by some advisers to be the greatest challenge of his candidacy for the presidency - Mr Obama tackled the issue of racial politics head on, an approach normally guaranteed to clear a room or destroy a budding political career.
"I suppose the politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just hope that it fades into the woodwork," he said, adding that "race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now." As the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas, Mr Obama has personally juggled racial divisions and seen first-hand that they can be overcome. "I can no more disown him [Wright] than I can disown my white grandmother ... a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe."
Speaking of America's "racial stalemate", he said: "I have asserted a firm conviction - a conviction rooted in my faith in God and my faith in the American people - that working together we can move beyond some of our old racial wounds," he said. He talked about the anger among African-Africans that could be heard at the barbers or the beauty parlour, a hangover from the days of segregation. But he was also swift to acknowledge what he called "the resentments of white Americans" that should not be dismissed as misguided or racist.
The complexities of race were something the United States had not yet made perfect, Mr Obama said. "And if we walk away now, if we simply retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come together and solve challenges like health care or education or the need to find good jobs for every American."
He expressed exasperation with the media for scouring every exit poll during the tight Democratic race for signs of racial polarisation when his campaign message of unity had led to commanding victories in overwhelmingly white states. The election had recently taken on, what he said was "a particularly divisive turn", which was a political risk to his campaign ahead of the Pennsylvania primary on 22 April where white votes will play a key role.
"We can play Reverend Wright's sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathise with his most offensive words," he said. "We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she's playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies.
"That is one option," Mr Obama said. "Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, 'Not this time'."
For rolling comment on the US election visit: independent.co.uk/campaign08 Search Query: Independent.co.uk The Web Go Advanced search
©independent.co.uk
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


120 Comments so far
Show AllSad thing is that Wright was right.
Shouldnt have to apologize for someone who speaks the truth.
I'm not an Obama fanatic but I was genuinely surprised, it was a really effective and wise speech. He's by far, the most capable person in the presidential race. And by the way, Wright's discussion about chicken's coming home to roost, regarding 911, whats the big whoop? Chalmers Johnson said the same thing in his book "Blow Back" but he's white, my bad. Also, indicting US support of Israel as a problem, another big whoop. There is no floor effect to the stupidity of the US electorate, so who knows how this will play out.
Reverend Wright's comments shouldn't be the real story, rather John McCain's spiritual adviser Reverend Rod Parsley's should.
"Senator John McCain hailed as a spiritual adviser an Ohio megachurch pastor who has called upon Christians to wage a 'war' against the 'false religion' of Islam with the aim of destroying it."
http://www.motherjones.com/washington_dispatch/2008/03/john-mccain-rod-parsley-spiritual-guide.html
John McCain seeked the endorsement of a man who believes America was founded to destory Islam. Why is this not in the news?
I read the speech, and I also read an AP story about it yesterday. The AP story was much better than this one, and the quotes from the speech were powerful and made me want to read the speech. This story manages to bring to my mind the word "insipid". Now, why is that?
kathyodat
typ, McCain's minister isn't criticizing America. That's a big N0-No.
kathydoat
I think this speech was directed at the news media more than any other group. There was a sense that the media was pulling a "Howard Dean screech" on Obama. It's truly amazing how often the cable news shows were showing the short clips of Rev. Wright's sermons and the pictures of the two standing together. I think Obama challenged them to rise above the distractions and divisions and focus on the issues. Time will tell if it worked.
I heard the speech while driving in the car - heard much of it again last night on cspan. VERY impressive and what Americans should really listen to. I still don't believe Obama is presidential material. I listen to Hillary and I hear knowledge-based commentary, facts, solutions, and as she said - she KNOWS the world leaders the next president will need to sit down with. I believe she's brilliant. Obama is highly intelligent - but as an extremely well read, well educated friend of mine (also a liberal) says, he's "preacher lite." I agree.
As for McCain - still can't get it out of my head that he once said, publicly, that Chelsea Clinton (age 13 at the time) was ugly because 'her father is Janet Reno.' That's plain mean. (A few months ago McCain's daughter praised Chelsea for her composure and other qualities.)
McCain lacks even the smallest amount of class and gentility (not to mention intelligence) that I want to see in MY White House.
BeForKids March 19th, 2008 11:53 am:
"…the quotes from the speech were powerful and made me want to read the speech"
I agree, this was an authoritative speech. It was different than the previous snippets of Obama that I have heard. Usually he is channelling the persona of a pastor, whipping the crowd into a frenzy. This speech was more of a "racial/immigrant politics for dummies" lecture. He has shown that he understands the chasm of fear and hate that separates the opposing sides.
I think the speech was a good one. But, we already knew that Obama can deliver great speeches. I like Obama.
This issue is for him a disaster. I saw it coming months ago when I visited the website of his church. I am familiar with the worst of Black liberation theology and this stuff is getting there. Is there some truth to it? Sure. Is it what we want in a president? I think not. Even Obama thinks not... apparently... publicly.
However, the great unanswered questions are these: Why would Obama spend 20 years under such preaching? Why would he subject his daughters to it? Why confront it only now? These are questions of judgment, courage, and candor. They remain unanswered. We are left to wonder.
A disaster.
Juliann,
Hillary seems to me to be "Bush Lite". She's corporate, and Obama's the people. Look at the two campaigns. She gets money from lobbyists and PACs, and he gets most of his from over a million small contributors. His campaign has been very well run, and is energized by grass roots volunteers. Hers has been a disaster. She's had to loan herself money, and still can't compete in the small states. This should tell you something about how they will run the white house.
I agree, It was a skillful speech that said the right things to defuse the whole brouhaha without sounding like a waffler.
But I wish Obama could have foud a way to gently remind the US citizenry that Wright's roosting chicken sermon was largely a truthful account of the karma of US foreign policy.
I also wish Obam could have left out the "stalwart ally Israel" and "it's all caused by Islamic extremism" remarks. Surely he must understand the rage of someone who has had their land robbed, home bulldozed, and family members killed (or does he?)
But as far as the upcoming primary in my home state, Sorry, but I just don't see substantiative differences between the two, except for one -Hillary is older. Normally I wouldn't put much weight on seniority, but in this case, it means that Hillary remembers and was politically active (on the Eugene McCarthy campaign) during the brief period when the US was moving in the right direction.
Obama on the other hand was just a toddler during this period, and his entire political memory only begins with Ronald Reagan. He's referred to this period of progress as an era of "excesses" - which sudggests he largely only retains unflattering stereotypes of this era. So, can we trust Obama to even know what social progress even looks like?
Obama said this early in the speech:
"But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren't simply controversial. They weren't simply a religious leader's effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country – a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam."
Clicked it off right there. Based on this, Obama has a profoundly distorted view of Middle East history, its religion and cultural conflicts, and the US's role in them. "Stalwart allies like Israel" are code words for more par for the course Israel cheerleading and un-evenhanded involvement in the region. The world needs much better than this now.
If you can look past some of this significant content, the Obama speech seems to have, typically, more stirring oratory. Where is the policy substance?
Johnny Mo,
Speak for yourself.
I would LOVE to have a president informed by either the black-Protestant, or the Catholic versions of liberation theology.
Such a theology is rooted in a pretty damn accurate analysis of US history and it's imperialist foreign policy.
yohocoma,
Agreed, you said it better than I tried to do.
And I don't know about where you all live, but in my home town of Pittsburgh, "endemic" would pretty accurately describe the white racism I see here.
But, at the risk of sounding like I'm defending Obama, the objectionable paragraph you quoted was only a small part of the speech.
USAn,
That may be. I would disagree.
None the less, Obama disagreed with you. In fact he rather clearly distanced himself from Rev. Wright's teachings, and espoused the sort of stuff quoted above by yohocoma. Either Obama believes what he says he does now... or he believes what Rev. Wright teaches on these things, and yet is not saying so. Therefore he is either a liar or a coward... or both. Unless you can think of another explanation.
Johnny Mo, I have friends I love. I don't agree with everything they believe but I still love them. In your mind does that make me a liar or coward?
Juliann, why dont you go to the following link and read about Hillary's past and present Blackwater positions and then talk about her veracity and worthiness to be President? Pay attention to the dates of her statements of what she knew and when.
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/03/19/7773/
kathyodat
BeForKids, "I have friends I love. I don't agree with everything they believe but I still love them. In your mind does that make me a liar or coward?"
No.
However, that is not the current situation. I am not asking why Obama continues to love Rev. Wright. Not at all. I just wonder why someone who disagrees with his pastor so vehemently would spend 20 years under his teaching... with his wife and daughters... providing financial support... and say nothing publicly.
Surely he did not think that these ideas are unimportant... or not formative. Does he secretly agree with Rev. Wright but just lacks the guts to say so? I just don't know, and his speech only exacerbated the wondering.
As is always, always, always the problem, the ones who bother listening to a speech like that are not the ones who need to hear it. And it was a beautiful speech, full of heart. In my young life, I've never seen a guy as human as Obama get this close to the presidency.
However, in sharp, ugly contrast, I held down my vomit and checked in with Sean Hannity on Faux last night to get his take. Though he seemed desperate and pathetic to keep the fires hot in regards to the Reverand's emotional words, he did it for the whole damn hour. A headline somewhere yesterday said the election may pivot on the fickle votes of white males. Question is, are more of them listening to Obama's speech or Hannity's smut?
Obama is in trouble and more for than just this black theology spectacle and yesterday's followup therapy session on trauma(politically, a desperate defence wrapped up in the American flag). What about his out and out two-faced lies to the working people of Ohio re:NAFTA? (Of course, what's most telling here, is the lack of political experience trusting former Canadian "Reform" party and former Ontario Harrisites to not let the juicy goose out of the bag)... or are we speaking again of 911 chickens and foxes! And then there was the all dressed-up private Islamo/public split personae -is it all out of the closet? A Republican/Clinton dream... did you catch the atavistic Obama-Hillary dreamteam throwback picture on CNN last night??
Wonder which way the Democratic Superdelegates will vote anybody??
Johnny Mo,
I should have pointed out that I am under NO illusion that Obama is an anti-imperialist or believed in liberation theology. I was referring to a hypothetical president taking such positions.
USAn,
I think honesty in any sane president would be refreshing. It would be wonderful to have a leader who really believed in something other than himself... or herself.
Truly the best speech by a U.S. politician on the subject of race since Robert Kennedy 40 years ago. Astonishing how adult straight talk is so vastly different from the normal crap we get on TV news & talk shows. Jarring. Refreshing. And the public (most of it) will appreciate this, in contrast to the usual fare. Needless to say the TV pundits didn't get it, wondering out loud if Obama was taking a "big risk," if the speech wasn't "aiming too high" for the American public. They're so used to aiming for the lowest common denominator, they actually believe the public wants the junk they feed them just because they watch it (or not).
So, whatever his shortcomings, we have here a candidate who might just be the kind of president that attracts people back into politics for the best reasons --including, very importantly, the young-- and a candidate who will attract problem solvers into government, people who believe government can be used constructively. Sure Hillary sounds more like a policy wonk, which she is, but you don't need a policy wonk for President. You need an inspiring leader, and hopefully (unlike Reagan), one who inspired people in ways that brings out their political best. If he makes it, it'll be up to all of us to hold him accountable.
I look forward to his two Iraq speeches.
The fix is in. Clinton will get her way. Clinton is in bed with McCain, they'll probably make room for one another whichever one wins. You know McCain is famous for reaching across the aisle. I figured this out when Clinton said only McCain and I are qualified to lead this country. Now the proposal has come up to let the super delegates have a primary and get it over with. Clinton leads with the super delegates. McCain is already over in Iraq, I don't know how many times. Probably making deals as if he has already won the Presidency. I call this election cycle the "screw you" America "vote."
CanadatoImperium, sounds like you fell for the Clinton-Harper setup of Obama, which was done just in time for the Ohio primary. Even though the setup was exposed, it didn't get any media mileage - now why would that be?
Obama is too populist for the taste of the corporate media. I'm suspecting that they thought supporting him would doom the Democrats, but when he showed broad popular appeal, transcending racial barriers, they changed tactics. So we know who's really pulling the strings of the American electorate puppets who will vote in whatever direction the corporations choose for them.
kathyodat
The" Harper setup" marks a new low in my opinion of my government and points to sinister connections across our borders, connections we are expected to politely ignore. And probably will.
Wake up people! We're being farmed!!
In what way was it a setup?
No one is dusputing that the Obama aide said his comments about renegotiating NAFTA were just some BS being fed the electorate.
Shortly after this statement, he also effectively said that his promises about getting out of Iraq is juat some optimistic scenario for public consumption and shouldnt be taken seriously.
Are you not concerned that you are being lied to?
And straight talk or not, Obama's speech seemed express a profound, typically-American, ignorance of Palestine and the middle east, as well as the day to day realities of poor African Americans.
Reverend Wright was right. End of story. It saddens me in Obama's speech that he blamed the Palestinians for their own suffering. Audacity of hopelessness.
USAn, first, it wasn't an Obama aide but an economic advisor, not on his staff. Second, the advisor was contacted by the Canadian consul in Chicago and told that what Obama had been saying about renegotiating NAFTA to be more fair to American workers mainly referred to Mexico was correct. This information was forwarded to the Canadian government, and Harpers' chief of staff spoke to reporters about Clinton reassuring the Canadians that NAFTA talk was campaign rhetoric. This is confirmed information. The story line that went out on the wires switched the name from Clinton to Obama. Also confirmed information. Then a memo was "leaked" from the Canadian administration about Obama saying it was campaign rhetoric which the Clinton administration wallpapered all over Ohio. Harper belatedly (after the Ohio primary) apologized for interfering in US political processes. That's why I called it a setup. Where are you getting your information from?
kathyodat
Kathyodat,
I don't care where the information came from, just the veracity of the information. Of course both Obama and Hillary lie to the voters.
One cannot make special terms regarding the NAFTA treaty that only apply to Mexico, so I doubt anyone said that. Mexico isn't the problem anyway, what needs to be renegotiated is the Chapter 11 agreements that give investors effective sovereignty over local labor, public onwership, and environmental laws. This is the part Harper's big-business buddys were worrying about, and the part Obama, and Clinton too, reassured them about.
I thought Obama's speech was brilliant, inspiring, and moving, and my opinion of him increased tenfold after hearing it. I thought he handled a very difficult subject and this whole controversy extremely well, and I believe he was/is sincere. He reached out to whites, blacks, Latinos, Asians and Native Americans, and recognized their feelings and anger and struggles. This is the kind of leader we need, and he is in a unique position, because of his mixed race background, to be a voice for healing in this country. while I don't agree with Obama's positions on many issues, he has strengths that my candidate of choice, Dennis Kucinich, doesn't have (and it's a moot point, since Kucinich is out of the race).
Obama is the same age as me. But I think he is older, wiser and more mature than his chronological age reflects. I don't care if he doesn't have the same amount of experience as say, John McCain does. As has been said many times, experience and judgment/wisdom are two different things.
Yesterday, John McCain - the man with all the experience - gave a speech in Jordan in which he said that Iran is training Al Qaeda and then sending them back into Iraq. Only after Joe Lieberman whispered in McCain's ear (just pathetic) did McCain correct himself, apologize, and say that Iran was sending "extremists" into Iraq, not Al Qaeda. (McCain apparently was unaware that Iran is backing the shiites in Iraq, not the Sunni-affiliated Al Qaeda.)
So I'll take character, judgment, wisdom, insight, courage, and empathy over "experience" any day.
I believe Obama is the right leader for this country, given where we're at, and that this country would be lucky to have him as President.
Riverman: At 1:08 you sent the same exact post above to the story about "The Left was Right".
Neither story was about John Edwards. What is your point in sending in this stuff?
I saw the speech today and thought it was, by the standards of normal American political discourse, great. That is, it was reasonably intelligent and nuanced, rather than just a series of empty soundbites or incoherent rambling like George W. He seemed to really try to challenge and educate people, as opposed to manipulate them. Which means he probably doesn't have a snowball's chance in Hell of actually becoming president.
As far as Wright's remark go, I don't see what all the fuss is. Then again, I'm a white guy who worked for an African American newspaper for five years. Those kind of opinions appeared on the op-ed page all the time (lest white folks get too upset, opinions condemning the behavior of gangsta rappers appeared all the time too. Nobody goes harder on the African American community than African Americans themselves.). It's a sign of how out of touch your average white person is with the African American community that anyone would find these remarks surprising. Of course racism still exists in this country. Of course our foreign policy alienates and oppresses people around the world, leading some of them to want to strike back. Of course African Americans would see a connection between the treatment of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza and blacks in South Africa. The good reverend has nothing to apologize for, as some have suggested.
It was by far, the best and most inspiring speech I have ever heard or seen a person give, and he had it down pat, without having to read it. It was magnficent and soul searching. If Obama is as good a man as he appeared and sounded, he is a true 'statesman' and perhaps the finest person who ever ran for the office of the presidency of the United States. I do hope that indeed he is.
I did and I do however have a serious question. ___ Obama stated that his white grandmother, who helped to raise him and who loved him, had at times made racial comments which made him cringe.
However, Obama then stated, that he had NEVER, EVER, heard his pastor in private, ever say ANYTHING anti-white, or speak out ANY racial comments. __ NEVER! ___ Is that so? ___ How strange, the man was his mentor and a very close friend and advisor for the past twenty years, a minister who has been making anti-white, racial remarks and speeches and sermons ever since he began his ministry. The type of speeches and commments which are not healing, but instead are hateful, revengful and devisive.
I found that comment by Obama to be difficult to believe, as are his comments that he has always been against the war and occupation of Iraq. ___ Which is just not so, as proven by his voting record as a US Senator.
I do hope that Obama is as good as his speech, for he has an excellent chance of being our next president. I hope if so, that he is not just a brilliant, highly intelligent orator.
"It saddens me in Obama's speech that he blamed the Palestinians for their own suffering. Audacity of hopelessness."
I am a member of AAI (Arab American Institute), I received their voter guide in the mail yesterday, they picked Barak Obama.
Early last year I deceided to support Obama and I have sent him money 3 times. He passed my test. He went to the anual AIPAC (obligatory or die) meeting and said just enough to keep the attack machine at bay.
This meant he will be able to run as a non-threating candiate. If he didn't play along he never would have made it to first base. Look at Kucinich, they destroy you.
From everything thing he has said in the past I do beleive he will help the Palestinians. Also the co-founder of the "Palestine Human Rights Campaign" is one of his foreign policy advisors.
There is Hope.
"Everything he has said in the PAST" ~Maggie~
Isn't Obama a very close supporter of Joe Lieberman and his policies?
Hope is often just that, without honest action, hope is hope. When I vote, I try not to think of it as buying a lottery ticket. Of course it has often turned out that way.
It was so refreshing to hear something that wasn't PC...I suspect this will go down as one of the great speeches of the 21st century. It was the speech of a leader...now there's a concept.
Obama is Borg. That is the reality. Be mature and face the facts.
A leader needs to be able to do FAR MORE than give a good and inspiring speech. His was an EXCELLENT speech. Racism is 2-way (my uncle was the 3rd white man in his neighborhood to be murdered by 3 black teenagers - 1977 - the teens' goal was to eradicate all the whites in the neighborhood).
I like Obama but he's not presidential material. Maybe in 8 years - I would hope! - and he'd get my vote if that were to happen.
But now - he's preacher-lite.
Everything he has said in the PAST" ~Maggie~
Isn't Obama a very close supporter of Joe Lieberman and his policies? " Kem
Every freshman Senator (or congressman) is assigned a mentor. Assigned, they do not get to pick. Obama was assigned Lieberman. During that period he went to Connecticut to campaign for him. When his adjustment period was over he campaigned for Ned Lamont.
Selective memory, or ignorance of facts is what makes the MSM spin so easy. It's amazing how so many people can hold on to rummors, untruth's and personal belief's even when the truth is presented to them, or so easy to look up.
Kem, this was the first time I've seen you say anything kind about Obama, I was shocked, but you did have to end it with the usual misstatements. I understand you wanted Edwards, but it always amazed me how you couldn't recall his actions during the 2004 Presidential campaign. he switched tactics with every revue he got. His let's place nice only last until he's really losing, his populist program this time did not jive with his private sector life. did you ever research Edwards?
Kathodat,
Does Austan Goolsbee exist or not? Is he an Obama Economic Advisor?? As far as I understand it, he does not deny meeting Mr. Brodee, advisor to our Canadian Prime Minister, Mr. Harper. He simply states that Mr Brodee misunderstood his comments or took his comments out of context or whatever.
Of course, we'll never know what was truly said or see the infamous memo. And of course, Obama obfuscates like a typical politician. In short Obama goofed.
What is Borg, KARLOF1?
after obama's wonderful speech, i was sure his supporters could tone down their irrational hatred of hillary clinton, but maybe even ghandi couldn't get his followers to keep to a nonviolent plan.
if you admire the man enough to want him for president, can you admire him enough to emulate the biracial understanding?
The best analysis of this situation can be found here:
http://www.counterpunch.com/wise03182008.html
and here:
http://www.counterpunch.com/wise03182008.html
kem, the borg are a fictional hive mind from star trek next generation and subsequent spinoffs.
i agree that obama is a nice young man whose vision is excellent. in four or eight years, maybe he will be as ready to govern as he is today to give a speech. if he becomes our president soon, i wish him all the best.
If we are goimg to hold Obama to account for what the minister of his church said, should we not hold Hilllary Clinton to account for what her husband DID?
Her schedule released today shows that SHE WAS IN WHITEHOUSE almost every time Bill and Monica went at it...the only explanation that I can think of is...THREESOME
Aanyway...Mr Wright described the US as "a racist country with a murderous foreign policy and a corrupt government."
before we hang Obama out to dry for something someone else said....CAN ANYONE HERE ARGUE AGAINST HIS WORDS?
IS AMERICA NOT RACIST?
IS AMERICA's FOREIGN POLICY NOT MURDEROUS?
IS GOVERNMENT NOT CORRUPT?
USAn, we're not talking about special terms. The terms presently do not provide environmental and worker safeguards which really have little impact on Canada because they already have them. Mexico does not, which is why our jobs initially fled to Mexico, not Canada.
mary lou, did you read about Hillary's lies about Blackwater? In Nov 0f 2007 it came as a big surprise to her that Blackwater was immune from criminal prosecution, although Obama had presented a bill to the US Senate in Feb of 2007 to hold them accountable for crimes and she refused to sign on to it. Explain that, please. And I can well understand her not wanting to release her tax returns. What a conversation that would start.
What a drag for Obama, getting stuck with Lieberman as a mentor. Especially as Lieberman technically and certainly in spirit isn't even a Democrat.
I think we have an opportunity in Obama to choose greatness for President. Or we can go with McCain, who appears to be starting to dodder, or DLC Republican-lite Hillary, and end up with the same old - same old. Corporations first, people last.
kathyodat
"Snippets of some sermons are being endlessly looped on American television and on YouTube, showing Mr Wright describing the US as a racist country with a murderous foreign policy and a corrupt government."
While politically dangerous this statement is none the less true!
kathodat: "Or we can go with McCain, who appears to be starting to dodder"
Starting? McCain is a doddering old fool who has lost all credibility, and yet he still has a better than 50% shot at the presidency thanks to the choices of candidates presented to us by the Democrats.
This business with Wright would have no pull if it weren't for three words: "God damn America." However, I was pretty upset to hear about him writing off the vicious murders of 9/11/01 as chickens coming home to roost. Whatever white America's sins against dark-skinned people within our borders or against other nations, the victims of 9/11 did not deserve to die for them, any more than Iraqis have deserved to die for Saddam Hussein. Wright's remarks reminded me strongly of the ones by Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson. They too blamed America for 9/11, just picking different sins.