Email List
Most Popular This Week
- Everything Is Rigged: The Biggest Price-Fixing Scandal Ever
- Study: Monsanto's Roundup Herbicide Linked to Cancer, Autism, Parkinson's
- Picture of the Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- Bradley Manning is Off Limits at SF Gay Pride Parade, but Corporate Sleaze is Embraced
- Study: Monsanto's Roundup Herbicide Linked to Cancer, Autism, Parkinson's
- Everything Is Rigged: The Biggest Price-Fixing Scandal Ever
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- The Life and Death of Words, People, and Even Nature
- You and Your Family Are Guinea Pigs for the Chemical Corporations
Popular content
Today's Top News
Counter-Recruitment Is Not Counter-Military: A Letter From a Colonel
As a 29 year US Army/Army Reserves Colonel and a U.S. diplomat who resigned in March 2003 in opposition to the war on Iraq, I am very proud of the city of Berkeley, California. Berkeley and her citizenry have had the courage to stand on their peace convictions and declare that it does not want its youth recruited into the illegal Iraq war. Neither the action of Berkeley City council, nor the actions of the anti-war groups that oppose the location of the office in Berkeley, mean they are anti-military, or that they are "traitors" to their country. Rather, the actions reflect the sentiment of the people of Berkeley that they can "Support the Troops," but also acknowledge publicly that one of the most effective strategies to resisting the war in Iraq is to make it harder for the military to find young people to send as cannon fodder.
It is not news that Berkeley has a long history of peace activism. In the 60's the Berkeley Free Speech Movement challenged the University of California's restrictions on student political activity and the right to speak and organize on the campus. The Berkeley campus was a center of civil rights and anti-war agitation.
Almost forty years later, on February 11, 2003, the Berkeley City Council adopted a resolution that expressed its opposition to "pre-emptive" military action against Iraq. Five years later, in February, 2008, the City Council of Berkeley, reflecting the continuing mood of her citizenry, declared its opposition to the occupation of Iraq by asking the US Marine Corps to remove its officer recruiting station from just off University Avenue, the city's main thoroughfare, where it is 2 short blocks from the University of California and four blocks from Berkeley High School. Today, concerned and engaged Berkeleyans remain outside of the recruiting station getting more creative with their peaceful resistance to the attempted militarization of their youth and ready to put a measure on the ballot that would further limit the reach of recruiters into their community.
With a recruiting budget ranging into the billions, the military services tempt young high school students with large signing bonuses up to $20,000, home loan opportunities for enlistees, and citizenship for non-citizens. Military recruiters make daily forays into high schools throughout our country, with video games, military paraphernalia and promises of college money and non-combat positions to teens of color and from low-income communities. In many schools recruiters are so integrated into the schools that they have reserved parking spaces.
The request by one city council that one recruiting station be removed from its community does not pose a threat to the national security of the United States. Yet, the Bush administration has created a firestorm over the actions of the City council and anti-war groups by giving "hate" talking points to conservative radio and TV talk show hosts and ordering right-wing street organizations to descend on Berkeley. The anger and virulence of right-wing rhetoric indicates the depth of concern the administration has about its ability to recruit for the war in Iraq and for other potential conflicts. These right-wing groups are even going so far as to launch a new study about the supposed violence perpetrated on Recruiting Stations around the country- with direct reference to the peaceful Berkeley campaign.
Berkeley may be the only city to make a request for the recruiters to close shop, but each week counter-recruitment groups in cities all over our country stage peaceful protests in front of US military recruitment centers. The protestors hope to focus public attention on the unprofessional recruiting practices employed by over-worked and stressed out recruiters who are trying to sell a highly unpopular war to an increasingly hostile public. Many peace organizations greet potential recruits outside military recruiting stations with literature that points out information on military service that recruiters never disclose to recruits and with questions to ask recruiters.
As anti-war sentiment has increased in our country, recruiters are having a harder time filling their quotas. Educational standards for recruitment have been reduced. People with criminal records are allowed to join. Potential recruits are told that there is no war. Recruiters bend the rules, and among other illegal practices, let persons with known drug addictions join the military. Other recruiters sexually assault potential recruits. A 2006 Associated Press investigation revealed that across all military services, one out of 200 frontline recruiters-those who deal directly with young people-was disciplined for sexual misconduct in 2005.
The Berkeley City Council's original language that the Marine recruiting office "is not welcome in the city, and if recruiters choose to stay, they do so as uninvited and unwelcome intruders" has been removed from the Council's February 13 statement, but the sentiment remains that the Council and the people of Berkeley do not want the youth of their city recruited into this war.
Free speech is the right of our citizens, even when the speech criticizes our government and its actions. The people of Berkeley have stated their adamant opposition to the war in Iraq. This should not be misconstrued as hostility to the young people in our armed forces or as a lack of loyalty to our country. Dissent is a form of patriotism, and the government should listen to its citizens clamoring for an end to this disastrous war.
Ann Wright served 29 years in the US Army and US Army Reserves and retired as a colonel. She served 16 years in the US diplomatic corps in Nicaragua, Grenada, Somalia, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Sierra Leone, Afghanistan, Micronesia and Mongolia. She resigned from the US Department of State in March, 2003 in opposition to the war on Iraq.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



35 Comments so far
Show AllAnn Wright -- Thank you for your committed honesty and principled actions, their are too few examples of this, especially when psychopathic tendencies are qualifications for high offices.
You do your Country and its People a great service, and set a tone of the whispers of a growing song of true freedom regained.
Bless you,
Namaste
… … … … … Mahatma Gandhi … & … ML King … … Inspiration … … … … …
« We must be the change we wish to see in the world »
« There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need but not for man's greed »
« We adopt the means of nonviolence because our end is a community at peace with itself » — MLK
Thank You.
The words free speech are an oxymoron with emphasis on moron. Speech is costly in terms of career, social life, and citizenship. The costs of speech have risen during the term of the bush administration. Anyone who speaks the truth as best they can discern it are marginalized in jobs, churches, and society. If a man takes a testosterone and beef approach to anti-war speech he will likely be arrested if not killed. It appears that the men of this country, before too long, will be forced by events to speak out and take action against the forces of American Fascism. When the time comes we will know it.
What's wrong with being "anti-military" in the sense that you want to see our grossly oversized military budget seriously and permanently reduced, that you want to see our society demilitarized, that you want our economy weaned from profiting from the production of weapons of mass destruction, that you want to see our foreign policy turn away from preemption and occupation, that you want to keep space demilitarized, and that you want an end to the endless lie of the so-called war on terror? I say be anti-military in all those senses, while on the other hand demanding that those who have served in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Bosnia, or otherwise are in turn served by the country with healthcare, psych-care, education, and financial assistance as necessary. I am deeply anti-military, as were the creators of the country who saw in expensive standing armies the raw material for tyranny at home and folly abroad.
Big Bad Bob: "How can you degrade Hillary and Edwards?"
Because they both voted for the War. Doesn't sound too intelligent to me.
I read this as I am listening to Winter Soldier testimony. I was the child of an army officer. My dad died two days before the Hussein statue was brought down in a huge photo op. I can hear my dad's tears today. I make myself ignore the candidate haters' comments. The candidates are corporatists. No one person can fix the mess we are in. I am so sick of the yellers. I'll vote Dem because of the courts, and I will urge my reps to deserve my support.
Thank you Ann! I second what Namaste just said.
Also, an article in the newspaper last week described how some of the Mexican gang members joined the Army or Marines just for the military training and there have been some confrontations within the service among rival gang members.
I've been listening on and off today of the Winter Soldiers testimonies on www.kpfa.org.
Three cheers for the good people of Berkeley.
Another example of just how pernicious recruiting efforts have become: my 6-year-old son was exposed to recruitment ads for the National Guard at a movie theatre where the ads are aired before the feature movie. He was influenced enough to believe that joining the Guard or other military service would be "fun." I am requesting our theatre to refrain from airing such ads, especially at movies where there are naive younger audiences.
I am a veteran of the Korean war period, and quite anti-military. There is nothing wrong about being anti-military, and I encourage all people to do so. This support the troops but not the war is nonsense; when you support the troops, you are supporting the war simply because without these losers and psycopaths, there would be no war. We are in the fifth year of the war, and anyone who joins knows what is happening, and they do not deserve support or anything else.
tnathant @ 137p...Very Well Said! I don't think any of the things that you mentioned will be realized until we face the military "sacred cow" square in the eye and turn it into hamburger!
Heaven forbid anyone should speak against our little lambs in the Army. But I'll say it right now: I do NOT support the goddamn troops! "Protecting freedom" my ass. How the hell can we all sit here fully aware of how despicable it is that our government sent planes to bomb and men to shoot up an entire sovereign nation, for obviously venal reasons, then say "oh but it's ok gang, go ahead and JOIN UP". I put myself on the line 40 years ago, defying the Draft and the American government which was reprehensible then in Vietnam and it's reprehensible now in Iraq, and I only wish every little dewy-cheek'd all-American cherub who dallies at the US military recruitment office would tell them to go F*CK themselves, then leave and go organize for real peace & social justice!
tritonpsh@aol.com
Berkeley rocks!
Screw the military industrial death complex and the highly offensive "defense" department.
I choose peace.
By the way, did you hear the joke about how the entire urban Bay Area is going to be sprayed for the next 5 years with untested poisons by the government to battle an agricultural pest who doesn't destroy crops?
Oh, no wait, that's not a joke.
It's illegal chemical warfare on a civilian population.
Anybody see a connection?
"nor the actions of the anti-war groups that oppose the location of the office in Berkeley, mean they are anti-military"
We should all be anti-military... what's the alternative? Pro-military? That mean pro-murder, pro-death, pro-rape, pro-pillaging, pro-exploitation, pro-racism. And support the troops??? HELL NO! That's like saying "I'm a good citizen and I support the rights of Ted Bundy to murder people"... Support the troops and you support psychopathic murderers.
Regardless (as if it ever were possible) of:(1.) Lying illegitimate pretexts to go to war
(2.)immoral war mongering profiteering,
(3.) pervasive corporate greed & global manipulations and
(4.) Rothschild banking cartel fomenting of wars, and then profiting from both sides of the suffering
(5.) … … …
(n.) My own commitment to revering ALL life as sacred
I still believe that there is something noble and truly altruistic to SERVE one's country, and risk life and limb for our common dreams and principles and our families safety.
Of course, killing is useless and only makes everything worse, so my point is really more likened to the issue of a parent or unknown passerby, who saves the lives of some children only to die him/herself.
SERVICE in it's highest sense - is sacrifice for our collective children - whose lives offer us infinite possible promise, of an unprecedented future.
BLIND Duty, following some mechanistic plan is like robots following other robots, hardly a flexible or humane approach.
I know "WAR CRIMINALS" are typically those from the losing side, being punished for doing much as "we" (the winners) did.
But justice says the Geneva conventions apply equally to both sides of any conflict - and far too many war criminal are getting away with murder.
Namaste
Riverman: I suspect you are being tuned out. You are against feminism and abortion? Are you low logics or what? I suspect that if only the intelligent got to vote you would not get a vote. Your attitudes are low logic. High logic is atheistic and pro-abortion. You flunk, you seem not bright at all.
if you exercise a little discipline, people might actually care about what you say. Right now you are easy to dismiss.
re "why can't people understand how this yes vote to go to war is the biggest blunder in history of america"
Because they believe the lies. Because they're afraid. Because they're unable to consider other paths we might take to achieve world peace (failure of imagination).
riverman's high logic and low logic = no logic.
Counter recruitment begins at home. Tell your children not to grow up to be soldiers. If you are not an officer, you are cannon fodder.
Somehow this article reminds me of mandates done centuries ago to slay all the first born sons. What passes for law in any society deserves and requires scrutiny. When a society becomes so aligned with miliary values (an oxymoron, admittedly), then it serves a collective death/destruction wish. AS I often chant, what we're seeing is a disproportionate fealty to the concept of Mars, the god of war. This worship of the hero, of brute force, or raw power is seen in American video, music, film and of course in the military recruiting centers that require fodder until such time as their robotic killer forces come into maturity. Hopefully Gaia will cast her vote and take the whole high tech nightmare down before it has a chance to condemn more children to the fate of depleted uranium or lives of lost limbs and livelihood.
"anyone who joins knows what is happening, and they do not deserve support or anything else."
Right on ; the only people who deserve support are the deserters , the deserter-supporters , the COs , the CO-supporters and the anti-recruitment lobbyists . The rest of Americans both military and civilian are talkers not doers
All right now.
Let's see UC Berkeley endowment reject all funding from concentrated capital.
Next, let UC Berkeley purge all "laissez faire" capitalist dogma from its curriculum.
Next, let Berkeley purge all silicon valley military-industrial bucks out of the city.
C'mon Berkeley! Show us the WAY!!!
IF WAR COULD BRING US PEACE
WE WOULD HAVE IT BY NOW.
WAR IS THE PREFERRED METHOD TO CONCENTRATE WEALTH AND POWER.
PEACE IS MORE PROFITABLE THAN WAR, AND TO MORE PEOPLE, WHICH IS THE RUB.
THEY HAVE TO CONTROL THE MEDIA TO CONVINCE ENOUGH PEOPLE THAT THEY (THE ELITE)ARE WHAT IS GOING ON.
THERE ARE SOOOO MANY MORE OF US THAN THERE ARE OF THEM...
Big Bad Bob__ You are right to defend Hillary and Edwards in the way you did. They would have made a great ticket together to put this country back in operation again. Thanks to the corporate media, Edwards never had a chance as he could not get any coverage. The Repugs had it figured out that their two "front runners" would derail the Dems as it would lead to dissention and chaos in the party.
rebelnow__Don`t make fun of riverman`s logic or lack of same. He can`t help it as too much of that polluted river water got in his brains.
josephmorton March 14th, 2008 4:48 pm
"...and anyone who joins knows what is happening, and they do not deserve support or anything else."
Geezus, that is complete bullshit! As Col. Wright wrote above, recruiters are having a tough time signing up new soldiers. So they wave the cheap, shiny trinkets in front of naive 18 year olds, or pull in with a semi-truck loaded with video games so the kids can play "war," all the while promising them whatever they (recruiters) think the kids want to hear. They target minorities and lower class kids by either going into their schools or to the malls where the kids hang out. With our sinking economy and fewer educational opportunities, these kids start thinking, "This don't sound so bad."
Hey, everybody deserves a job, but these recruiters are like used car salesmen. Recruiters have monthly quotas they must meet, so you know they're giving our kids a real sales job.
Check out this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fkkdoDOIJM called "Before You Enlist! (updated)" Actual Iraq "war" veterans speaking out to potential recruits on what you're promised vs. what you actually get.
Josephmorton, you don't know what in the hell you're talking about. Do some research on the topic before you start popping off!
I want to know how Ann Wright's Freedom of Information request is going - the one into what information the Americans gave the Canadians to prevent her from entering Canada to address Parliament.
"…and anyone who joins knows what is happening, and they do not deserve support or anything else."
Change the word "knows" to "has the means and the duty to know" and the statement is 100% correct. The US MSM and the US government have conspired to keep the truth under wraps, even though it is obvious to all who look.
rtdury--"C'mon Berkeley! Show us the WAY!!!"
Please do not confuse UC Berkeley with the City Of Berkeley. God knows, we the people of Berkeley have had enough and more run-ins with the UC system and UC Berkeley. UC Berkeley (especially these days) does not reflect the ethos of the City Of Berkeley. Thanks to Ward Connelly and a host of other conservative UC officals, the University demographics has changed considerably and the rate of Corporate funding has leaped to stratospheric limits. Its almost like having a giant-sized US multi-national corporation in your backyard !
By the way .. Thanks Ann Wright ... its quite rare these days to not be villified and treated like termites !!
None of you anti-military folks griped when my husband and many other military personel made trips to New Orleans with supplies for hurricane Katrina victims. My husband and his crew flew planeloads of hospital patients to Houston. He left for one of three trips 15 minutes before we were supposed to leave for vacation, with our car already loaded. He did not mind, and neither did I. Where were your complaints then? And he joined up in 1981, and did want to serve his country, including all of you. You don't like this war, and I don't either, but you would not have to fight for yourselves in any situation. He'd do his part to protect all of you. And the way the world feels about the US, that might happen sooner than all of you think.
Show me the person who joined the military because they wanted to kill people. Most join because of poor economic options, and you all know it. Others join because they have an idea, foolish and incomprehensible to many of you, that serving one's country is a positive contribution to make. What percentage of people in the military right now do you think joined after Bush started his stupid war? I can tell you that we never thought our family would face this situation with this type of leader. Neither did any of you, before Bush was "elected". He turned out to be far worse than any of us expected.
And none of you seemed too upset when my husband and others were sent to Afghanistan right after 9-11. And the many war protests in this city did not start then, either, because liberals and conservatives did not seem too upset by those deployments. You're bothered rightfully about Bush and you're foolishly painting with far too broad brushstrokes.
And one last thought: I'll believe you truly protest the war when you boycott the product we all claim it's about. A Montgomery-bus-boycott type of strategy would not only hit 'em where they hurt, but would hit the other major problem we all worry about but don't do anything about: climate change. We'd have to stick it out and hold each other accountable, the way the folks in Montgomery did. I'm not holding my breath. Griping about the military seems to be regarded as a far more preferable option.
thundermoon:
The US military is not all bad, many of us on CD criticize them when they commit illegal and immoral acts (including in Afghanistan). Few of us disapproved of humanitarian aid provided by them in NO or Indonesia.
We did complain about how many of them did not help with National Defense in NO, because they were too busy helping kill people overseas for the sake of the greed of the already wealthy, and to incite attacks against the US. We pointed out the cluelessness of the USN officer who was surprized by the locals in Indonesia reacting favorably toward them and their work; that officer must have accepted the admirals' explanation that killing people is helping them in Iraq and Afghanistan, and that those people should be grateful too.
A lot of people on CD do protest the war by boycotting the oil, at least to the best extent they can.
I agree many join the US military with good intentions, although a minority do so with bad ones. It is unfortunate that they did not appreciate the often sordid history of the US military. Every major attack on the US was incited or carried out by the US military or ex-US military, hundreds of thousands of deaths in total.
The bumper sticker says, "War is not the answer." Yet many can not list the reasons why the statement is true. Here are six reasons why war (militarism) is not the answer.
(1) Militarism is expensive. We spend more than the rest of the world combined on our military, yet it did nothing to prevent the attack of 11 September 2001. Thousands have died in Iraq and Afghanistan. We are well on the way to spending 3 trillion dollars on these wars, yet Al Qaeda and the Taliban have not been defeated.
(2) Militarism has the features of an addiction. We appear to be stuck in Iraq and Afghanistan. The problems of getting out of these wars loom larger than problems associated with getting in. Just try getting serious about stopping the production of Cold War armaments and see how far you get.
(3) Militarism creates enemies. Note that our symbol of world economic domination and the seat of US military power were the targets of the 11 September attacks.
(4) Militarism is obsolete. In a few years EVERY country interested in owning nuclear bombs will have them. Biological and chemical warfare are cheap and getting cheaper. Universal disarmament is imperative if there is to be a future for our species.
(5) Military training teaches brutality and violence. Hate groups emulate the military. The U.S. demands that the world cooperate with our desires and to a large extent it does. The U.S. plays the role of school-yard bully in the world. Is this who we want to be?
(6) Militarism is incompatible with democracy. "You can be a democratic country, as we have claimed in the past to be, based on our Constitution. Or you can be an empire. But you can't be both" (Chalmers Johnson, author of Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic.)
my 15 year old is getting recruitment mail, with so many promises of college and employment...nice slick full color pamphlets and brochures...
it worked on my 19 year old...who after fighting fires in San Diego...was told that the money taken out for unemployment ins...would not be available to him...he signed up with the army out of desperation for employment and looming education loans...
and he was raised in an "anti-war" family...that knows how the military brainwashes the youth...
yes, the military does do good things...and could be used here at home as well,...reforestation...building environmentally sound homes for the poor...rebuilding bridges...cleaning up polutiion...fighting forest fires...cleaning up after natural disasters...etc
"I still believe that there is something noble and truly altruistic to SERVE one's country, and risk life and limb for our common dreams and principles and our families safety." i agree...our children could be here HELPING at home...truly being of service and not in harms way for the defense of the oil industries
Berkeley is far from the only city attempting to stop mililtary recruitment. Indeed, though I'm grateful for Code Pink's efforts, the total recruits in the City of Berkeley are about 22 per year.
I have drafted an initiative or the November ballot that would cancel San Francisco's annual Fleet Week, Blue Angels, and all-out military recruitment drive.
I am collecting signatures to qualify for the ballot right now.
Here's some food for thought as you consider your strategies for frustrating the efforts of the United States Military to recruit volunteers; would you prefer a draft instead? Leave the recruiters alone. They're doing their job. Let the young men and women of this country decide as to whether or not they'll volunteer. Or, are you opposed to free choice too?