Jeff Cohen's Message Clear: Don't Trust Big Corporate Media
The message from Jeff Cohen's lecture Tuesday at North Central Michigan College was clear -- "You can't trust the big corporate media."
Cohen, who in 1986 founded Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR), a national media watch group that documents media bias and censorship, talked to a crowd of about 375 in NCMC's Student Center Cafeteria about what he called his "misadventures" in the mass media.
Throughout his broadcast journalism career, Cohen worked for CNN, Fox News and MSNBC, and likened his rise and fall in broadcasting to the story Alice In Wonderland.
"Alice fell into a rabbit hole and I fell into the muck of 24/7 news," he said.
Cohen explained to audience members that, because of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, large entertainment companies such as Time Warner, Viacom and Disney have been able to take over many of the country's news outlets, therefore inserting their own code of ethics and bias into the national news.
He said that true journalism has been blocked by these corporations because they are protecting their special interests, and as a result, instead of hearing about the important world issues, the public is saturated with news about "Britney Spears and her sister."
"When big news is blocked, trivia falls into the vacuum," Cohen said. "When journalists are too busy waving flags, they're too busy to do their job, which is ask the tough questions."
Cohen said his broadcasting career came to an end just before the United States invaded Iraq. At the time he was a senior producer for the hit MSNBC show Donahue, and says he believes the network terminated the show because it was doing its journalistic duty.
"Donahue was terminated on the eve of the Iraq invasion -- how often does a channel kill its most watched program?" he said. "Those of us who challenged invading Iraq, and those of us who acted skeptical, for the most part, we've been banned from the media."
Cohen said a majority of the media personalities who were wrong about the invasion of Iraq have been promoted within the industry. As a result, he says he believes the news media can be summed up in one word -- kakistocracy.
"It means ruled by the worst," he said.
Cohen said he believes the American public is extremely misinformed.
"The power is at the top, and in our country there's a huge gap between knowledge versus income," he said. "I don't think it's a mystery that the American public is so misinformed -- I've made the argument that it's somewhat by design."
Dolly Hunt, a Lake Superior State University transfer student to NCMC, who considers herself an independent, said she agrees with Cohen's assessment of the media.
"I think that people are blindsided by the media -- they have a false sense of consciousness," she said. "Our entire social world is controlled by the power elite, and I fear for the young people because, in conversation with them, they don't see it."
As Cohen ended his lecture, he did so on a positive note, pointing out that independent journalists are on the rise, attempting to counteract the corporate media's bias.
"The good news is that the independent media in our country is booming thanks to the Internet -- it's the failures of corporate media that has led millions of independent journalists to start asking questions," he said. "It's an exciting time, but we have to keep the Internet safe from media conglomerates."
Steve Keller of Cross Village, who considers himself a conservative, said he was surprised by how Cohen came across in the lecture.
"He was more fair-minded and a little less radical than I thought he'd be," he said. "Of course I don't agree with most of his political viewpoints, but his views about the media I agree with."
Keller said he believed Cohen's lecture could have focused more on a solution to the problem than the problem itself.
"I thought it was surprising that he didn't get around to his solution, which was publicly funded television and the Internet, until the Q-and-A portion," he said. "It (the lecture) was fairly negative and pessimistic, as opposed to finding a solution."
NCMC student Nicole Oliver said she was inspired by the lecture and hopes others were as well.
"If the entire society as a whole decides not to stand for corporatized media, then it will be a peoples' media revolution, but if we sit still and silent, it's going to continue," she said.
Oliver said because of the large turnout at the lecture, she is hopeful that things will change.
"During the last lecture we had around 20 to 25 people, and this time we had standing room only," she said. "I'm really excited a lot of people took an interest, and I'm optimistic about change happening."
© 2008 Petoskey News-Review
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
43 Comments so far
Show AllCheck out the 3/12/08 entry on corporatecrimereporter.com
And so it goes...
The word genocide is getting thrown around too much here. It has a very specific definition. The consensus in the international community is that it means any attempt at or actual wiping out of all people of a certain race, color, creed, ethnic group, maybe ancestry, or a certain political faction. This has a rather limited application. Let's stop just throwing words around. What happened in Rwanda and I believe the Democratic Republic of the Congo was not just some simple "the bad guys did it" matter. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the USA has been the prime sponsor of those causing the rape, torture, pillage, and mass killing of innocent people. In Rwanda, it seemed to result from leaders of one ethnic group getting killed, and that ethnic group going off the deep end seeking revenge. It wasn't what the US mainstream media portrayed it as. It was surely wrong as hell.
THE OLYMPICS IN CHINA..THE REDUX OF THE BERLIN OLYMPICS..THE WORLD WATCHES AND IGNORES THE REALITY OF FASCISM...HAS ANOTHER LITTLE DISCUSSED ASPECT..AN EXPENSIVE EXPERIMENT BEING CONDUCTED BY THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT, THE US GOVERNMENT AND MAJOR INTERNET PLAYERS LIKE YAHOO AND GOOGLE...WHO HAVE NOT RELLY.."DENIED' IT...THIS EXPERIMENT SEEKS TO DETERMINE IF IT IS VIABLE TO CENSOR THE INTERNET AND STILL MAKE IT "LOOK" LIKE AN OPEN SOURCE OF INFORMATION..
THE CHINESE HAVE BEEN CENSORING THE INTERNET FOR YEARS...THIS IS DIFFERENT..THIS EXPERIMENT WILL TRY TO "FAKE OUT" THE USERS..THEY WILL NOT SEE ENTIRE INFORMATION, THEY WILL HAVE THEIR COMMENTS AND EMAILS SCREENED VERY QUICKLY SO AS NOT TO "SHOW" AN DELAY...THE REALITY OF THE FUTURE OF THE INTERNET, AND NET NUTRALITY, AND THE FREE FLOW OF INFORMATION...IS BASICALLY THAT IT IS TENUOUS AT BEST, THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE UK, CHINA, THE US..ARE CONSTANTLY SEEKING WAY'S TO STIFLE THE REALLY SIGNIFICANT THREAT THAT IS THE FREE FLOW OF KNOWLEDGE AND IDEAS..AND THE CHINA OLYMPICS WILL BE THE PROVING GROUND FOR TECHNOLOGY THAT MAY BE ABL TO "FUNNEL" THAT FLOW AND "CONTROL" IT..ALL WITHOUT THE END USER KNOWING ANYHTING ABOUT IT...
OH AND BY THE WAY...YOU ARE PAYING FOR IT...DO NOT PAY IN APRIL...DO NOT PAY YOUR TAXES...DO NOT PAY..
AND GET READY..FREEDOM IS ONE "ACT OF TERRORISM" AWAY FROM ENDING..AND THIS MAN..AMONGST MANY..WILL BE TAKEN IN THE DEAD OF NIGHT...TO AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION WHERE HE WILL NOT BE TORTURED...THIS IS GETTING DUMB..SORRY...LOOK INTO IT FOR YERSELF..CHINA WILL CENSOR THE INTERNET AND THE US IS WATCHING..AND YOU ARE PAYING FOR IT..
Sabina, we still have the American Indian genocide continuing at home. We need to end our own genocide before we go globe-trotting to end others. Or do you believe American Indians are sub-human and deserve to be killed and their land and resources stolen?
Jeff Cohen and FAIR are not as clean as he pretends. I wrote to them long ago about the genocides in Rwanda and Congo that have killed millions since 1990 - and they don't even bother to respond and explain why they don't make the scandal public.
The only bits of truth on mass killings in Africa are on globalresearch.ca and zmag.org.
And the continuation of the coverup - of genocide! - is now going on with the UK paper scotsman.com withdrawing its critical articles about Samantha Power, who has been a major propagandist to cover up the truth about the Rwanda genocide.
Hey GESTALT: Do U really believe the BBC still has "broadly accepted non partisan credibility"? I don't.
IT HAS a WELL RECOGNIZED NAME but the rest is gone.
Try to find the truth about 9/11 by BBC or better yet of the 7/7 bombing in london!
I encourage everyone to listen to FAIR's weekly radio program (Broadcasted too early in my area), watch "77 Ripple effect" on the inside job of the bombings in London.
Infowars.com (Alex Jones) should also receive a plug. For Alex one MUST go past his religious fundamentalism and go for his love of America as envisioned by the founding "Fathers"; he was also 1 of the 1st to expose the coup of Sept 11 and "the road to Tyrany". Several of his movies are on Google video, except for 1 recently censored by GOOGLE (it's starting folks...).
I like Oped News and Common Dreams : MUCH BETTER THAN BBC!
I think recognition will come for a few sites -on the net- as it did for some sources in the past out of the many
Pretty simple message, Bill Moyers did a story about how during the run up to the Iraq invasion in late 2002 and early 2003, there was evidence that a lot of the so called info was misleading if not an outright lie. The corporate media (NBC,ABC,CBS,CNN et al) all gave the White House a free pass and did not challenge anything. The only one to point out some of the inconsistencies was CSPAN. Even PBS was under the gun with Gingrich trying to take away its funding in the late 90s, so they did not rock the boat. They have got corporate sponsors now too. If you want the news, watch BBC or some independent source. But even BBC had Blaire that was following Bush around like a puppy.
Watch Al jazeera to get a balanced view of whats taking place in the middle east. Its just amazing to me how people in Amerika are force fed the crap, and they just keep coming back for more. I now know where the phrase full of shit comes from!
Nathaniel Heidenheimer and jfc
raise legit concerns about the limitations of the present Internet a newssource. But these concerns go deeper, for many of us.
Unless average citizens become better organized to protect their interests against a government now effectively hijacked by plutocrats, the Internet is unlikely to remain free and open.
And even presumming the Internet and its diverse news sources can be protected againt regulation designed to favor organized wealth, there is as yet no common code of ethics for Internet news source reporting. Most people simply go to their 'favorite' source of Internet headline/article news, not even caring whether such sources are factually rigorous.
The FCC ultimately failed to regulate broadcast news media ownership/diversity [which presumably would've helped guarantee some degree of accountable objectivity] because its appointed comissioners came to increasingly reflect the deepening corruption of the entire federal gov by private wealth and big corporations.
The crisis of USA democracy, at one level, is the crisis ideologicalized news - i.e. the lack of any commonly vetted/trusted source of news facts, such as the Brits, at least to some extent, have in their BBC.
Internet news is unlikely to solve the problem of indeolgicalized-news fact in a society so-corrupted by greed and privitization that facts themselves are openly declared to be 'private property, any better than the old, corrupt FCC world of broadcast regulation solved its problem of making sure that licensed broadcasters operated "in the public interest."
If groups like FAIR can bring light and democratic resolution to the underlying crisis of news legitimation we now face even more direly with the vast proliferation of pseudo-ojective, Internet new-fact sources , it will have done much more than simply reform US news media: It will have transformed public consciousness about the basic corruption of nearly all our society's major institutions.
"Cohen explained to audience members that, because of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, large entertainment companies such as Time Warner, Viacom and Disney have been able to take over many of the country's news outlets, therefore inserting their own code of ethics and bias into the national news."
And who was the president who signed this bill into law? Why, Bill Clinton.
This one act changed the course of the future for this nation. It created a ruling class of media elites with control of the mass media that the Soviets would have envied.
Bill Clinton later said that he made a mistake by signing the bill into law. Seems like making mistakes that hurt this country runs in the family.
Being a card carrying member of the RPC, I say, we gotta push to make something happen to change things for the better.
Thomas O: Thanks for the link to Youtube . You really have to wonder what people are going to
say and write about the bush years 50 years from now. They will have to wonder how so many
Americans were led to believe the propaganda they were fed. As Hermann Goering said "All you have
to do is tell people they are being attacked and denounce the pacificts for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to greater danger". Gwb is taking a lesson from his grandfather, Prescot
Bush who was a very wealthy banker some 60 years ago. He was an admirer of Hitler and made loans
to the Nazi party of Germany.
It didn't happen overnight. You've been sleeping.
The thing is, now that people are waking up from their slumbers. Do they hit the snooze bar and go back to bed? Or do they start questioning their perceived realities?
MSM is this way by design, not by accident.
And it's O.K. to be mad, and angry, after all you've been being lied to and manipulated on a daily basis.
It didn't happen overnight. You've been sleeping and acting sheepishly.
The thing is, now that people are waking up from their slumbers. Do they hit the snooze bar and go back to bed? Or do they start questioning their perceived realities?
MSM is this way by design, not by accident.
And it's O.K. to be mad, and angry, after all you've been being lied to and manipulated on a daily basis.
If average citizens, thru intended-democratic processes of government [like the FCC's supposed regulation of media ownership 'in the public interest'] can't beat back centralized corporate domination of news media, due to FCC corruption, how can we same average citizens expect to use any other aspect of our corporate-dominated governmment to keep the Internet free?
Nathaniel Heidemheimer's good post, above, tries to address this question. But I think his answer begets other questions.
Even assuming the Internet can somehow be kept reasonably free & open by a citizenry which has already lost control of its government's regulatory & lawmaking functions, the Internet's varied news functions will continue to lack anything resembling a broadly-accepted, non-partisan Credibility to the reporting of news facts (ala the BBC, for instance.)
Unless another News Legitimation principle is developed [by common/nongovernmental assent, presumably), and guides the proliferation of Internet news sites, the Internet may well simply renew and expand the maddness of the old, defunct/corruptted FCC-licensing system.
MIND YOU: I'm not advocating, whatsoever, increased government licensing of Internet news (or any other) Internet functions. But I don't see how Internet news, as a fully privatized/competitive process is going to magically avoid reproducing exacly the crisis we have now: No objective, reliable source of news, but instead myriad news sources operating according to audience 'marketing preferences,' and/or privately established [ownership] standards of accuracy/objectivity.
There are no easy, obvious/democratic solutions to this problem. But its an illusion to believe that an epistemologically-fragmented, easily-hypnotized society, like the USA, will solve it, simply by blind faith in news source customers expressing their 'preferences' for 'factual news' on an Anything Goes internet.
If average citizens, thru intended-democratic processes of government [like the FCC's supposed regulation of media ownership 'in the public interest'] can't beat back centralized corporate domination of news media, due to FCC corruption, how can we same average citizens expect to use any other aspect of our corporate-dominated governmment to keep the Internet free?
Nathaniel Heidemheimer's good post, above, tries to address this question. But I think his answer begets other questions.
Even assuming the Internet can somehow be kept reasonably free & open by a citizenry which has already lost control of its government's regulatory & lawmaking functions, the Internet's varied news functions will continue to lack anything resembling a broadly-accepted, non-partisan Credibility to the reporting of news facts (ala the BBC, for instance.)
Unless another News Legitimation principle is developed [by common/nongovernmental assent, presumably), and guides the proliferation of Internet news sites, the Internet may well simply renew and expand the maddness of the old, defunct/corruptted FCC-licensing system.
MIND YOU: I'm not advocating, whatsoever, increased government licensing of Internet news (or any other) Internet functions. But I don't see how Internet news, as a fully privatized/competitive process is going to magically avoid reproducing exacly the crisis we have now: No objective, reliable source of news, but instead myriad news sources operating according to audience 'marketing preferences,' and/or privately established [ownership] standards of accuracy/objectivity.
There are no easy, obvious/democratic solutions to this problem. But its an illusion to believe that an epistemologically-fragmented, easily-hypnotized society, like the USA, will solve it, simply by blind faith in news source customers expressing their 'preferences' for 'factual news' on an Anything Goes internet.
The press has yet to catch on to the Bush Family
Corporation called, "The Carlyle Group".
By having the leaders of Foreign countries become members of this Corporation, the Bush
crowd has enabled itself to buy out the world as we know it. AFter The Carlyle Group hired the brother of Sacorzy, the Premier of France,
France agreed to join our forces in Iraq etc.
Was this deal made in Kennebunk, Maine, when the premier visited the Elder Bush Last Summer?
The Democrats and the Press have yet to ask any questions regarding this company. Why?
How much longer can we play dumb? None as blind as he who does not wish to see.
In all fairness, I supported what FAIR was doing from the start, but I think the oldest issue of Extra, a publication of FAIR, I have around home is from 1989, which must have been roughly when I started providing financial support to FAIR. I regret any vanity in this regard in fairness to FAIR and Jeff Cohen.
If I didn't get this in there in the last post, "ain't" should go between "It" and "gonna."
Jeff Cohen is right on the mark, and I started supporting FAIR, the organization he founded way back when he founded it. Go out there and "kill 'em," Jeff! Somebody got to go out there to slay those big business dragons, and it ain't gonna be Saint George, but maybe it could be St Jeff.
Rudyjo - this one's for you:
"Fox News vs the people"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHTyE_soY8w
If everyone mostly wants the same things, opportunity, but also enlightenment, justice, responsibility and propserity for all, then there is a lot of very interesting news to be reported in the media. People would be very interested in what is going on with their peers everywhere. And people really would want the same things, and really would be interested in useful information, if only we can defeat the class war aggressors who exploit our media to addict us to their opiates, manipulate our understanding of our world, and enslave us to work in their sweatshops. The benefits to our emancipation from the capitalists include current prosperity on 15 hour work weeks, with almost total stability, free education, free transport, free healthcare, cheap food/shelter, mental/physical health, clean/healthy biosphere, and an end to all the massively destructive capitalist, militarist rackets that now represent 90% of the US economy.
We watch local "news" from San Antonio, Texas and it is one of the most trivial (and violent)broadcasts. All three affiliates are the same, with revolting crime stories, weepy human interest stuff, disasters, etc. etc. You get the idea. I visit Arizona and the Phoenix area stations are the same: celebrity crap and hyperventilating sports coverage. I get my real news from the Pacifica Network via satellite TV and the internet. Go Jeff Cohen!!!
Tonkatsu (March 13th, 2008 1:23 pm), I think you've hit the nailed on the head, but I don't think Britney directly collects a paycheck from the media. Rather, our major media is owned by large entertainment conglomerates such as Time-Warner, which is the parent company of CNN, as well as book publishers, record and film companies, and other media. Watch how often CNN reports on some star's misbehavior which then translates into that star's film, record, book, what-have-you, getting a boost in sales from the publicity. Most of the time you'll find the star is under contract to one of Time-Warner's companies.
Jfc (March 13th, 2008 2:20 pm), it's not necessarily that Americans are too lazy to read -- some of them are overwhelmed working two jobs in Bush's economy, just trying to keep their heads above water. They simply don't have the time or energy to keep up with the news.
Did you ever wonder why the Big Media work so hard to keep America a sexually repressed society? Not only can sex be used in 'soft porn' ads to move cars, clothes and perfume, but it's always handy to make the dogs salivate over such nothing trivia as a powerful man going to a prostitute. In Europe, they laugh at our unhealthy preoccupation with other people's sex lives in this country. What a generation of hypocritical vipers our careerist-yuppie media have become.
Rudyjo -- When you mentioned that "bush-cheney would not have happened if they thought the media was doing it's job".
All I could think of was "Damn that Liberal Media"
re Mordechai S 2:49pm
the education system is a failure only if you're a student (or parent of a student) from the working class.
from the point of view of the rentier class, however, whose lifestyles depend on a dumbed-down populace of obedient drones, and who are terrified at the thought of their inbred spawn having to compete on a level playing field, it's a howling success.
Whenever any item peddled as "news" is put out there, this maxim should always apply, "Consider the source."
90% of the crimes commited by bush-cheney would not have happened if they thought the media was
doing it's job. You can only get away with this stuff in a fascist society.
I wonder if the tv news knows that the Diebold voting machines glitched yesterday and spit out the presidential election results for 2008 months early. McCain won.
scottstlouis:
I'm sure you can appreciate the twisted humor and increased threat that Cheney's peace mission to Israel represents.
NEWS is an acronym for Neocons Eviscerate Working Stiffs. Of course, if the so-called average American "can't see" through the bullshit and propaganda served up by the MSM, if they "can't see" that Tim Russert is just a fat fuck serving up NEWS, it is yet again another testament to the general stupidity of this culture and the utter failure of the education system, from kindergarten through graduation from a four year university.
Don Henley, "Dirty Laundry":
I make my living off the evening news
Just give me something-something I can use
People love it when you lose,
They love dirty laundry
Well, I coulda been an actor, but I wound up here
I just have to look good, I don't have to be clear
Come and whisper in my ear
Give us dirty laundry
Kick em when they're up
Kick em when they're down ...
Kick em when they're up
Kick em all around
We got the bubble-headed-bleach-blonde who
Comes on at five
She can tell you bout the plane crash with a gleam
In her eye
It's interesting when people die-
Give us dirty laundry
Can we film the operation?
Is the head dead yet?
You know, the boys in the newsroom got a
Running bet
Get the widow on the set!
We need dirty laundry
You don't really need to find out what's going on
You don't really want to know just how far it's gone
Just leave well enough alone
Eat your dirty laundry
Kick em when they're up
Kick em when they're down....
Kick em when they're stiff
Kick em all around
Dirty little secrets
Dirty little lies
We got our dirty little fingers in everybody's pie
We love to cut you down to size
We love dirty laundry
We can do the innuendo
We can dance and sing
When it's said and done we havent told you a thing
We all know that crap is king
Give us dirty laundry!
While I entirely agree with the sentiments in the article, there is one LARGE drawback to the internet being the only place to find real journalism (which I believe is true): The problem is quite simple...most Americans are too fucking lazy to read. That is why the public airwaves must return to public control for the public good. While the internet has provided fertile ground for true journalist to do their work, the level of hits on news sites pale in comparison to the traffic on porn sites. I think that says a lot about what American is interested in.
scottstlouis: Amen!
The Spitzer debacle is obviously newsworthy-- but there's a long way between that reasonable assertion and even local newsradio stations breathlessly touting New Information! about the high-class Call Girl who was his undoing! (Was a red velvet swing involved? Film at 11!)
And the medium-priced teevee call girls on two local channels fell all over themselves last night with the video version of these compelling and vital issues. As usual, all this showcased in a perfect storm of prudishness and prurience.
And the newsradio station threw in a "special report" from some local psychologist go-to "analyst", solemnly reviewing the impact of Spitzer's public disgrace on his teenage daughters. Just shoot me!
This is offered in a straightforward, "neutral" manner which only emphasizes its smarminess-- to the discerning viewer. But I fear that we are the exception, not the rule.
I wish him well, but it will take more than one Jeff Cohen to reach the critical mass necessary to break through a heavily-bankrolled tradition of flim-flam and obfuscation.
In the same news cycle, I've learned everything I never wanted to know about Gov. Spitzer's call girl, while Adm. Fallon's resignation(thus signaling the countdown to WW III,or at the very least, $10.00 dollar a gallon gas)is treated as "almost news".
Free Floyd Collins !
If you look at it objectively, it becomes obvious that the obsessive coverage of various "Star" scandals is really thinly veiled Advertising for their various movie & television appearances. Many so called "Celebrities" are celebrities only BECAUSE of their outrageous behavior.
I'm waiting for the day that some whistleblower reveals that Brittany receives a Paycheck from Faux News as well as CBS, NBC & ABC every time she "screws up" publicly.
"So there, we have figured it out, go back to bed America, your government has figured out how it all transpired. Go back to bed America, your government is in control again. Here, here's American Gladiators. Watch this, shut up. Go back to bed America, here's American Gladiators. Here's 56 channels of it. Watch these pituitary retards bang their fuckin' skulls together and congratulate you on living in the land of freedom. Here you go America, you are free... to do as we tell you. You are free, to do as we tell you." --Bill Hicks
"Big corporate media" "news" is an oxymoron.
Not enough to preach it to the choir. Thats why were in Iraq. THE INTERNET IS NOT WORKING! uNLESS WE SPREAD IT ONTO BIG NEWSPAPER WEBSITES.
Which do you want agreeable converstion, or spreading truth to MAKE CHANGE?
cut. paste. or continued bipartisan totalitarianism.
I never watch televised news programs anymore. Get my news from the net.
Gee, corporations control the media, the white house, the senate, and soon the internet... Can you think of what else they would want to control to have a complete lock on society?
diebold
News flash - people will watch just about everything on TV, including the 24/7 news (entertainment) shows. Are they really that interested in Britney or do they simply watch it because it's the only news on? If real investigative reporting were on the news each night, this country would be marching in the streets demanding impeachment hearings, etc.