Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Wire: Bush-Era Fable About America's Urban Poor
The Wire, the television drama about Baltimore that just ended its fifth and final season, was a huge hit with critics who applauded its gritty depiction of urban life. The show won praise from reviewers across the political spectrum. From the N.Y. Times to the Wall Street Journal, from the liberal American Prospect to the libertarian Reason magazine, there was a unanimous chorus of plaudits for the HBO show whose large ensemble cast, comprised disproportionately of African American actors, include cops, teachers, reporters, drug dealers, dockworkers, politicians, and other characters in the real dramas of a major American city. Jack Dumphy, a columnist for the right-wing National Review, wrote that The Wire is "still the best show on television." Slate's Jacob Weisberg called it "...the best TV show ever broadcast in America." Stephen King, writing in Entertainment Weekly called the show "a staggering achievement."
Some critics compared The Wire to a great literary novel. Unpredictable plot twists, deft foreshadowing, and complex characters justify that judgment. The show juggled over 65 characters and kept them vividly evil, sad, or humane. Like most great stories, the main characters were morally ambiguous, but so finely etched that we cared about them. Even the gangsters were complex personalities, not the stereotypes typical of TV crime dramas. We ended up taking sides in gangland battles, rooting for Omar, Proposition Joe, and Bodie, and wanting Marlo annihilated.
The writers attended to detail. Police detectives drank "Natty Boh"-National Bohemian, a beer originally brewed in Baltimore. And the dialogue rang true. Snoop, second in command to drug thug Marlo, explained to a hesitant gang member how she'll retaliate if he doesn't cooperate: "We will be brief with all you motherfuckers-I think you know." Another drug kingpin, Avon, locked in jail and eager for stories in the street, asked Marlo: "What about you? How you been?" Marlo shrugs: "You know. The game is the game."
Anyone who's worked or lived in America's inner-city neighborhoods would recognize the reality of the show's characters and the issues of crime, poverty, drugs and family stress portrayed with a combination of sympathy and outrage. But the show's version of reality was only partly right. The Wire reinforced white middle-class stereotypes of inner-city life. The show's writers, producers, and directors persuaded reviewers that they were presenting a radical critique of American society and its neglect of its poor, its minorities, and its cities. But there's nothing radical about a show that portrays nearly every character-clergy and cops, teachers and principals, reporters and editors, union members and leaders, politicians and city employees-as corrupt, cynical, and/or ineffective. The Wire misled viewers into thinking they were seeing the whole picture. But the show's unrelenting bleak portrayal missed what's hopeful in Baltimore and, indeed, in other major American cities. In that way, The Wire was the opposite of radical; it was hopeless and nihilistic.
In 1994, a community group known as BUILD (Baltimoreans United in Leadership Development) led a campaign that mobilized ordinary people to fight for higher wages for the working poor. One of those people was Valerie Bell. She lived in a small row house in Baltimore. With just a high school degree, she secured a job with a private, non-union custodial firm that contracted with the city to scrub floors and take out the garbage at Southern High School. Baltimore was trying to cut costs by outsourcing jobs to private firms. Bell earned $4.25 an hour with no health benefits. Like so many others who earned a minimum wage each month, Bell coped with how to pay the electricity bill, groceries, and the rent.
BUILD put together a coalition of churches and labor unions, and lobbied the city to pass a "living wage" law that would increase wages above federal poverty line. The law would apply to employees who worked for private firms that had contracts with the city. It would affect 1,500 workers, hired by private bus, security, and janitorial companies. The ordinance would force wages up from $4.25 to $8.80 an hour over three years, and then increase each year to account for inflation.
At some risk to herself, Bell organized other custodians to join the living wage campaign. When the company discovered Bell's activities, it fired her. Undeterred, Bell stayed active with BUILD and helped gather petition signatures and organize demonstrations. BUILD recruited academics who produced studies showing that it made no sense for the city government to save money in the short term by underpaying workers, who then had to resort to a variety of government-supported homeless shelters and soup kitchens to supplement their low wages. Working with BUILD, Bell and others put so much pressure on the city, they convinced then-Mayor Kurt Schmoke to support them. As a result of this grassroots organizing effort, Baltimore passed the nation's first living-wage ordinance. The current rate is $9.62. (Last year, Maryland became the first state in the country to enact a state living wage law.)
Economists estimate that the law puts millions of dollars into the pockets of Baltimore's working poor each year, and has had a ripple effect pushing up wages in other low-paid jobs in the city. There are now similar laws in about 200 cities across the country.
For 30 years, BUILD--whose activism is based on the ideas of the late organizing guru Saul Alinsky--has been dedicated to transforming Baltimore's struggling inner-city neighborhoods. BUILD has not only won the nation's first living wage campaign, it also has built hundreds of affordable housing units called Nehemiah Homes (named after the Biblical prophet who rebuilt Jerusalem).
BUILD also created a network of after-school youth programs called Child First. That program began in 1996 with city and private money, and provides free after-school care for over 1,000 children every year at the city public schools. Child First is an academic enrichment program. The program involves parents, staff, administrators, church members, and other community members to help students, a real "it takes a village" approach. Child First trains parents to take part in their kids' education by volunteering at schools and coming together to discuss how they can improve the school system. Volunteers tutor students in math and English, help them with study skills, and nurture their artistic talents.
During the 2007 election, BUILD signed up 10,000 voters as part of its "Save Our Youth" campaign. Every candidate for City Council and Mayor, including the current mayor Sheila Dixon, committed to the agenda, which included doubling the number of summer jobs for young people and funding neighborhood recreation centers.
Last December, after several years of working with Dixon (as a City Council member and now as Mayor) to renew the run down section of Baltimore, known as Oliver--where much of The Wire is filmed--BUILD persuaded the city to transfer 155 abandoned properties to the community group, which will either rehab the homes or tear them down and build new ones, then sell them to working-class homebuyers. "BUILD is making steady progress in eliminating blight throughout the Oliver neighborhood, where 44 percent of properties are vacant," said Bishop Douglas Miles, 59, pastor of Koinonia Baptist Church.
A native Baltimorean, Bishop Miles, BUILD's co-chair, grew up in public housing projects. He's been involved with BUILD for 30 years. Under his leadership, Koinonia Baptist Church initiated a number of innovative ministries including an after-school program called Project Safe Haven, a juvenile alternative sentencing program that has saved many teenagers from the fate of a life in and out of jail. Bishop Miles, who has
watched every episode of The Wire, was outraged at the way the church community was portrayed. "The Wire ignores all the good work the faith community had done," he complained.
People like Valerie Bell and Bishop Miles--committed activists, who have persisted in the organizing through victories and disappointments, but never succumb to cynicism or corruption--were nowhere to be found in The Wire. Just as the show found no room for grassroots heroes like Bell and Miles, so too has it overlooked the efforts of other community groups involved in successful organizing efforts.
The fourth year of The Wire focused on Baltimore's school crisis through the lives of several young boys barely coping with problems at home and lured by the illegal drug business. At one point in the show, the boyish but cynical Mayor Thomas "Tommy" Carcetti, lobbies Maryland's governor to help bail out the city's bankrupt public school system. Missing from the storyline is what actually occurred in 2004 when two groups--ACORN and the Algebra Project--mobilized parents, students and teacher to pressure then-Mayor Martin O'Malley to ask for state funds to avoid massive lay-offs and school closings.
ACORN, a community organizing group, built a coalition that included public employee unions and the Algebra Project, a group founded by civil rights icon Bob Moses to organize young people around school issues. The community and union activists hit the streets and filed lawsuits to get more money pumped into the school system. In December 2003, ACORN organized a confrontation at a board of education meeting. With hundreds of ACORN members attending, and one member shouting through a bullhorn, ACORN took over the meeting before police hauled them out of the room.
The protest was part of a months-long campaign of agitation that forced O'Malley to come up with the money and avoid unnecessary lay-offs and a state take-over. Their action encouraged a school reform effort led by the new Superintendent Bonnie Copeland and egged on more families to become involved in their children's education.
"The system is in meltdown," said Mitch Klein, an ACORN organizer. "Cutting funds is like the Baghdad version of putting back together the Baltimore city public schools."
School reform is only one of several issues that Baltimore ACORN--an affiliate of a national organization with chapters in over 100 cities-has addressed. Its young organizers have identified and trained tenant leaders to wage a campaign to clean up hundreds of lead-contaminated rental units. ACORN's tenants organized a rent strike to pressure slumlords to remove lead hazards in thousands of apartments. ACORN's members also closed corner stores dealing drugs, improved the city's housing code enforcement program, and pressured the police department to assign more foot patrols to the low-income Cherry Hill section of Baltimore.
Banks have persistently redlined its minority neighborhoods or engaged in abusive, discriminatory predatory lending practices, leading to a recent wave of widespread foreclosures. Lobbied by ACORN and other community groups, Mayor Dixon and the City Council sued Wells Fargo Bank in January for targeting risky sub-prime loans in the city's black neighborhoods that led to a wave of foreclosures that reduced city tax revenues and increased its costs of dealing with abandoned properties.
"Some things I can't accomplish by myself," said Sonja Merchant-Jones, a former public housing resident who is active in Baltimore ACORN, "but together we've been able to confront elected officials, banks, and the utility companies, and get them to meet with us, negotiate with us, and change things. But I'm disappointed that I never see things like this on The Wire."
Robert Mathews is a 64-year-old janitor in an 11-story office building in downtown Baltimore. He rents a small house in Montebello, one of Baltimore's most troubled neighborhoods, with his wife and two grown sons. The former Merchant Marine has been a deacon in his church for many years and a mentor for many of the church's youth. He takes them on trips and counsels them when they appear to be heading in the wrong direction. For almost three decades, Mathews has also been a union activist, utilizing the same skills to counsel, mentor, and organize his fellow low-wage janitors across the city.
After 30 years cleaning office buildings, he makes $9.10 an hour.
Last December, Mathews helped lead a campaign of thousands of janitors in Baltimore, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C. to win a better contract, among them 700 cleaners, most of them African-American, at over 40 Baltimore buildings, including the high-rise Candler, Legg Mason, and Bank of America buildings downtown. After months of protesting, picketing, threatening to strike, and negotiating, the janitors-part of the Service Employees International Union's Justice for Janitors campaign-won a 28% pay increase. The janitors also won up to two weeks vacation and employer-paid family prescription drug coverage. The agreement added dental and vision benefits to the employer-paid health plan.
Mathews, who remembers when Baltimore's schools, movie theaters, and restaurants were segregated, participated in civil rights protests in the 1960s. "To make change, you have to take a stand," he says.
Mathews only occasionally watched The Wire. He was offended by its bad language, but also by its unrealistic depiction of the Baltimore he's lived in his entire life. "It's more negative than positive," he observed. "The people on the show don't have anything to live for. The young people have no vision. If you want change, you have to believe things can change."
These real-life organizing campaigns by BUILD, ACORN, and Justice for Janitors were reported in the Baltimore Sun and by local TV and radio stations. Yet David Simon, the show's creator, found no room to tell any of these stories in the 60 episodes of The Wire over its five-year run. "The show does an exceptional job of telling one side of the story," says Rob English, the 38-year-old lead organizer for BUILD who served for four years as a platoon leader in Somalia. "But it's missing all the pastors, parents and teachers, principles, young people who are doing amazing work, radically trying to change and improve Baltimore."
This is a problem, but not an aesthetic one. Shakespeare was not wrong because he didn't write about the good kings. Dante was not wrong because he wrote about hell. Simon's characters are fascinating individuals who reflect a broad array of human emotions and conflicts. The workplaces, neighborhoods, language and events portrayed in The Wire have the kind of verisimilitude that justifies the torrent of praise.
But Simon says he wanted the show to spur our country to do something about the plight of America's inner-cities. Instead, his portrayal of Baltimore buttresses the myth that the poor, especially the black poor in the city's ghettos, are drug dealers or users, eternally helpless victims, unable to engage in collective self-help and dependent on government largess, or crime, to survive. Week in and week out, the stories were so relentlessly hopeless that Slate's Jacob Weisberg felt buoyant because the show "...is filled with characters who should quit but don't, not only the boys themselves but teachers, cops, ex-cops, and ex-cons... This refusal to give up in the face of defeat is the reality of ghetto life as well. Feel me: It's what The Wire is all about."
Liberals, like Weisberg, are satisfied with the small ray of hope in some of these characters, like Bubbles, who maintain their dignity and pride amid such turmoil. Conservatives have their stereotypes reinforced, since the show depicts most blacks as dangerous criminals, drug addicts, or welfare recipients--culturally damaged, a class of people whose behavior and values separate them from respectable society. To liberals and conservatives alike, The Wire reinforces the notion that the status quo cannot be changed.
The Wire is populated almost entirely by low-income African-Americans and a handful of middle-class people whose jobs--cop, teacher, social worker, government bureaucrat, reporter, minister--involve relating to the poor as "problems" or "clients" rather than fellow citizens. For sure, many of Baltimore's inner-city residents are apathetic, alienated, and suffer from the "quiet riots" of crime, violence, drugs, and other forms of self-destruction. Most of the black middle class, like their white counterparts, have fled to the suburbs. But virtually absent from the show are the law-abiding working poor -- those who earn their poverty in low-wage jobs. Among Baltimore residents holding full-time jobs, 14 percent earn less than $20,000 and 38 percent make less than $30,000.
The few heroes depicted in The Wire are individualist renegades and gadflies. These include cops like James McNulty and Lester Freeman and the stick-up artist Omar, as well as social worker Whalen (a Narcotics Anonymous sponsor played by the singer Steve Earle), the Deacon (an influential West side church man played by Melvin Williams), and Dennis "Cutty" Wise (whose boxing program may stop a teenager from succumbing to life of drugs). Unlike ACORN, BUILD, the Algebra Project, and
Justice for Janitors, these do-gooders don't seek to empower people as a collective force. They try to help individuals, one at a time, rather than try to reform the institutions that fail to address their needs.
These people organized by BUILD, ACORN, SEIU, Algebra Project, and other community, labor, and environmental justice groups maintain a sense of hope and possibility in the face of difficult odds. And, slowly and steadily, their organizations have won significant victories that improve the lives of Baltimore's poor and working class residents.
These community activists are not superheroes or naive idealists. They are ordinary people who sometimes manage to do extraordinary things. What distinguishes them is their patience, political savvy, street smarts, empathy, faith, and people skills required to build strong organizations that can mount grassroots organizing campaigns. They harness what organizers call "cold anger" and turn it into outrage against injustice rather than indiscriminate rage.
They do not expect to turn Baltimore upside down. Rather, they mobilize people to win small, concrete victories that improve people's living and working conditions, and whet their appetites for further battles. They challenge the city's political and business establishment and seek to get Baltimore's power players and institutions--employers, landlords, politicians, police chiefs, and others--to the bargaining table, where they can negotiate on a somewhat level playing field. They don't always win, but by their persistence and their ability to recruit people to join them, they have to be taken seriously by the city's powerbrokers.
But community activists and leaders like these don't exist in the Baltimore depicted in The Wire. Without them, and the organizations they belong to, we are left with a view of Baltimore's poor as people sentenced for life to an unchanging prison of social pathology. This, in fact, is how The Wire views the poor.
Simon recently told Slate that, "Thematically, it's about the very simple idea that, in this Postmodern world of ours, human beings - all of us - are worth less. We're worth less every day, despite the fact that some of us are achieving more and more. It's the triumph of capitalism." He added, "It's the triumph of capitalism over human value. This country has embraced the idea that this is a viable domestic policy. It is. It's viable for the few."
But Simon's worldview is hardly radical. He generally views the poor as helpless victims rather than as people with the capacity to act on their own behalf to bring about change. He may think he's the crusading journalist exposing injustice, but he's really a cynic who takes pity on the poor but can't imagine a world where things could be different.
Ironically, Simon's last season ends with a critique of the press for failing to tell the true story of the inner-city. Simon blames the Baltimore Sun's weak reporting about cities on its decision to kill off its poverty beat in the early 1990s. "To write intelligently about the complexity of urban society," Simon said, "reporters need to know not only their beat inside and out, but possess an awareness of social and economic trends over years, if not decades." Simon was determined to show the real inner-city, warts and all, but ends up showing only the warts.
America's media consistently fail to report on grassroots organizing. Few daily newspapers, and no broadcast media, have a labor beat, or a community-organizing beat, or an activism beat. In its portrayal of the Baltimore Sun and the city's TV news reporting, The Wire reveals that daily reporters have little time or inclination to learn about complicated issues or follow a story over time, especially when it involves inner-city activist community groups. So most reporters can't possibly understand and properly report on these groups' issues and the persistent, patient work that has brought an organizing campaign to the point at which a reporter encounters it.
Reporters know how to cover rallies, demonstrations, and riots, where protesters disrupt business-as-usual and get into the media's line of vision. But effective grassroots organizing is rarely dramatic. It typically involves lots of one-on-one meetings, strategy discussions, phone calls, and training sessions. The news media rarely pay attention to the small miracles that happen when ordinary people join together to channel their frustration and anger into solid organizations that win improvements in workplaces, neighborhoods and schools. The media are generally more interested in political theater and confrontation--when workers strike, when community activists protest, or when hopeless people resort to rioting. As a result, much of the best organizing work during the last decade has been unheralded in the mainstream press.
The view from The Wire is similar to a spate of recent books by liberal journalists who give readers an "inside" look at the lives of the inner-city poor. These include Jason DeParle's American Dream: Three Women, Ten Kids, and A Nation's Drive To End Welfare, David Shipler's The Working Poor, and Adrian Nicole LeBlanc's Random Family. They each provide vivid narratives about the real struggle it takes to survive in urban neighborhoods, and the revolving door between prison and ghetto for many black men. They are meant to humanize the plight of lower-income black families. But like The Wire they draw a portrait of the African-American poor as helpless and hopeless victims. There are no winners; just losers. Watching The Wire we are encouraged to feel sympathy, guilt, or outrage--but not hope.
Perhaps it is no accident that The Wire is ending its five-year run just as the Bush era is ending. The zeitgeist of the Bush era was a culture of fend-for-yourself cynicism, with no agenda to address the needs of cities like Baltimore. It was an era epitomized by the claim of Alphonso Jackson, Bush's Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, who testified to Congress that "being poor is a state of mind, not a condition." It was an era that saw the Bush administration's savage indifference to the survivors of Hurricane Katrina. It was an era when the White House demanded that underfunded local school systems leave no child behind, but failed to provide the money to hire the teachers to make it possible.
It appears that, as we usher the Bush era out the door, Americans may be ready to feel hopeful again, reflected in the broad appeal of Barack Obama's campaign, who after graduating from Columbia University became a community organizer in Chicago.
Perhaps, a year or two from now, a little-known writer will propose a new series to TV networks about the inner workings of the White House and an idealist young president, a former community organizer, who uses his bully pulpit to mobilize the American people around their better instincts. This president would challenge the influence of big business and its political allies, to build a movement, a New Deal for the 21st century, to address the nation's health care and environmental problems, to provide adequate funding for inner-city schools, and to reduce poverty and homelessness. A savvy network executive will scoop it up, schedule it for prime time, and give it a title that will let Americans know that the cultural tide is changing: "Left Wing."





22 Comments so far
Show AllGreat article. I've only seen a few episodes of The Wire but the assessment here rings true. I'm not sure the Shipler book on the working poor should be lumped in with the other books criticized, but the overall point that there are many positive stories of people struggling--together--against the odds to do productive things in our cities is absolutely correct.
"It was an era epitomized by the claim of Alphonso Jackson, Bush's Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, who testified to Congress that "being poor is a state of mind, not a condition."
And if you are suggesting that its a "condition" you've just ruined a perfectly good essay. Enough with the victimology already. There are as many reasons for being poor as there are poor.
There is no program approach nor has there ever been a sucessful system to end it so far.
Well, I'm not sure this is very fair.
I got into watching the wire this year. And knowing I was watching the start of the fifth season, I went back and watched all the previous years. So I've been a bit immersed in the show. :)
The first part is very accurate. Its a very deep show. Its characters are developed and complex. The point is that to do exactly that sort of writing means you have to narrow your focus. That's where this piece is very unfair. While the show was concentrating on doing a wonderful portrayal focused on some specific aspects, this article seems to criticize it for not covering everything in the entire city.
The first season focused on street corner drug dealers and the way the police respond to that. The second season focused on corruption on the docs. The third season went back to the gangsters from the first season, but focused more on where the money went which led to politics and real estate development. The fourth season focused some on kids and schools. The fifth got more into politics and brought the press and the local newspaper and the way it works and covers the stories into the picture.
Each of these was very detailed with excellent characters. But you have to recognize that there had to be a focus. They could not cover everything. If they had tried, you'd have ended up with shallow characters briefly mentioned and superficial looks at everything. So, take the show for what it is. Don't criticize it for it not being what it couldn't be.
Some points are well taken. It could have done more with activists. They are there a bit in season three. A police captain tries a very radical response to the local drug dealing, and the way the neighborhoods involved respond is a part of the story. But its correct, the focus on the story is not on the activists. They show up briefly asking tough questions at neighborhood meetings. And certainly not taking any over like ACORNS does. But, if you been to meetings like that before you can watch the show and pretty much fill in the blanks on why some of these ladies are at the neighborhood meetings and raising issues in the first place.
And one thing I noticed by the time I'm watching the last season was you never saw any truly corrupt cops. There are very political cops, but none that are just flat out in the pay of the gangsters and protecting them. Ya know that happens.
But the focus is much more on institutions. The way the institutions react and on the way the people inside the institutions deal both with the internal politics of the institution and the situations they face while trying to do their job. So, you see a police force that's driven entirely by 'crime stats' and trying to make the mayor look good, and how that filters down to the street and really puts the cops in the position of not doing good police work and putting away people who need to be put away, but instead just running up crime stats with easy busts. Or you see a teacher in the school system trying to do right for his students while still dealing with the politics and bureaucracy of the school system.
And one of the really good parts of the last 2 or 3 seasons of the show was the way it showed young kids growing up in this area and how they ended up as adults. What's the path that leads from being a 12 year old boy in this area and how does it lead to the future? One succeeds and goes to college, one becomes a heroin addict, one ends up juv detention and a 'group home' for orphans, one ends up a cold hard killer. What happened to each. The characters of the kids and the people they interact with are complex. This aren't simple stereotypes and comic-book characters. You watch people try to help some of these kids and fail ... or sometimes succeed. Or sometimes have some success but the world around them turns it into a failure.
Don't blame the show for not saying everything. Give it credit for what it does say and use that as a starting point.
Reading this article from the bottom up, it's a plug for Barack Obama, in the form of a soporific TV pilot about "an idealist young president, a former community organizer, who uses his bully pulpit to mobilize the American people around their better instincts."
Barack's supporting cast could be a gang of self-righteous "community" hustlers from ACORN and BUILD claiming credit for Maryland's living wage.
Schedule this thing opposite reruns of the Wire, and seven or eight people would probably watch it.
And why would they rather watch "The Wire"? For the same reason people can't take their eyes away from a train wreck, or a trapeze artist that is obviously having a bad day... maybe, just maybe, ooohhh, aaahhh...
"The Wire" is entertainment, and real hard work work and drudging determination don't sell no motherfucking beer and SUV's.
I hope you cynics are comfortably smug in your armchairs, remote in hand.
Hope is audacious, and you are neither hopeful nor audacious.
There is irony in the suggestion that a show about Barack Obama would be preferable to The Wire, or at least show a markedly contrasting worldview, given that Obama has named The Wire as his favorite show.
I always think I watch too much TV. Having never seen "The Wire," though, I feel better about myself.
This is an artful analysis. It takes a lot of subtlety now, to catch their act. We've come a long way since Dragnet and Hawaii 5-0.
I had an encounter with a Hollywood Screen Writer back in the Sixties. I was part of her research I guess. Her idea was to juxtapose two primary characters, hippies. One was the Organic Food Eating, occasional pot smoking, happy Gypsy Boots type, Dead Head guy. The other was the SDS belonging, bomb building political activist with an amphetamine problem, that yelled at everybody and beat up his girlfriend.
Activist = Bad
Dead Head = Harmless
They've gotten more sophisticated but the bottom line is always the same. If it weren't for that PESKY BILL OF RIGHTS, our Public Servants could really clean up the streets and jail the bad guys.
35 years of Draconian Legislation and the message is still the same. Apparently, it's working for them.
Vince Lawrence says I am "neither hopeful nor audacious," and E.P. Clapp Professor Peter Dreier sent me an email insisting that ACORN and BUILD are "hustling for justice."
E.P. "Gomer" Clapp Professor Dreier is a tireless shill for the wonders of grass-roots organizing, and even managed to cough up a little praise for John Edwards' health care plan because "Edwards is the first presidential candidate since Robert Kennedy who understands that grassroots organizing -- from the Boston Tea Party to the civil rights movement -- is a central part of American tradition."
Now E.P. "Dingleberry" Clapp Professor Dreier has jumped on the Obama bandwagon, even though Obama's no-mandate healthcare is a pitiful shadow of Edwards' plan, or Kucinich's single-payer proposal, and Obama is the anti-change candidate on healthcare issues.
But apparently the quality of healthcare doesn't really matter to E.P. "Buckwheat" Clapp Professor Peter Dreier, as long as undue credit for something goes to futile and self-promoting organizations like ACORN and BUILD.
Everyone is being profiled now, no one uses thier own thoughts about who the person is that is standing right next to them. Look at hmo sponsered "long term care" places for old people. They never see the sun.
Gee, this makes me very happy that I don't watch commercial TV - the 'circus' that keeps people mesmerized on the trivial whle their country goes down the drain. Goebbels would have loved it! And people even PAY to get brainwashed! What a deal!
Bernays brought misery to this country - along with his Rockefeller cohorts - and few people are the wiser. They know SOMETHING is wrong here - but can't take their eyes off the boob-tube long enough to actually THINK. This has to be the worst addiction to ever afflict mankind - even worse than religion, since it is only a part of the spectacle. Puts Rome to shame. Just look at all the time you guys just wasted talking about trash... and you wonder why we're in this mess????
While I can understand some of the discussion here, the main thing that seems to be absent from this article, etc, (which is huge), is that "The Wire" is FICTION, folks.
I mean, if they would have just called the city Delmore, versus Baltimore, would this even be discussed?
I'm sure Simon, at first, was much more interested in telling a GOOD STORY (using his personal knowledge and experience from past jobs, etc). Only when the critics came kneeling (and the show kept on), most likely, was when his high ideals and intentions probably came out (though honestly I havent kept up with what and when he said it).
While their is definitely realism involved, like most fiction, it isnt supposed to be factual. Generally, the darker side of life usually tends to be a bit more interesting than the positive and hopeful, when it comes to this kindof stuff. I mean, NOIR is what it is, at heart.
I dont watch television normally, dont have cable, but I did get hooked on The Wire by rentals, and found it to be gripping entertainment. Best TV I've seen since Twin Peaks.
Take it or leave it.
Social movements--where people (especially the poor) mobilize themselves (with or without the help of ACORN, SEIU,etc)--are the great secret of the modern world. They practically never appear in any popular culture (not only in the US, but elsewhere as well), except as bomb throwers, humorless dogmatists (not that reading the comments section on CommonDreams doesn't partially confirm this stereotype, to be sure) or perhaps con men. At best their aspirations are condensed into one inspirational figure like Erin Brokovich. They also rarely get much sympathetic treatment in the mass media. Yet they are the source of most of the ideas that constitute progress in a meaningful sense.
I have not seen The Wire. My sense of most of the heavily hyped shows on HBO (Sex in the City, The Sopranos, Deadwood, Larry David, etc) is that they are aimed at a very specific sort of upper middle class consumer. This viewer may be liberal enough to hate Bush, but is unlikely to be interested in collective struggles that may challenge some of their privileges. So these shows are always very sophisticated, but also heavily depoliticized.
As a fan of The Wire (its last two seasons) and one who once did a little anti-poverty community organizing myself (I have great respect for ACORN), here's my take on Atlas and Drier's critique.
Every single character that was developed in any detail in that series had strengths and flaws (in dramatically different proportions), but being so rounded out was what made them believable. Similarly, all of the institutions were shown with a lot of warts, but also with occasions when they did things right and terribly wrong (often in spite of, or because of, the structure of those institutions). Many reviewers called The Wire "Dickensian" for its capacity to depict the human strengths and weaknesses of the individual characters from the bottom through the middle to the top of the social class structure of the whole community.
If the writers had stirred a grassroots community organizer component into the plot line mix (or segments dealing with the tireless antipoverty efforts of church groups or progressive labor unions) where do you end up?
From an artistic standpoint, you surely don't want to depict these folks as flawless heroes adrift in an otherwise deeply flawed world. So instead, should viewers be treated to episodes in which the community organizers' meetings deteriorate into petty shouting matches over whose fault it was and whose head should roll because we missed the last deadline for bloc grant funding, or who among us might have wasted or outright stolen from the limited resources our project once had?
Much like the cops often miss busting the really bad guys, and junkies keep falling off the wagon, and news reporters get manipulated and mess the true story all up, successful grassroots antipoverty community organizing efforts are the exception rather than the rule. I'm uncertain The Wire would have been better, or more realistic, or even more politically relevant, if it had added in that additional subplot to make the same point over again.
Bill from Saginaw
The Wire was no less exploitive of its social and economic setting than 90210, Desperate Housewives, or Flip this House. In fifty hours The Wire created a narrative that was enlightening, informative and very true with the different subjects it dealt with. The son of a friend of mine who worked at H.U.D. was a consultant for the segments on real estate fraud. Attention to the little details and accuracy in forming the plot lines were some of the great strengths of The Wire.
While the author of the above article laments the omissions of The Wire let me point to a few of his, how anybody could write more than a few paragraphs on The Wire without pointing to the superb quality of the writing, acting, directing, cinematography and the shear magnitude of keeping nearly 60 actors the writers, directors and crew from not killing one and another while filming on location is beyond my comprehension.
While they were filming a scene in a Baltimore neighborhood a local walked up to Bubbles and palmed him a vial of heroin and whispered "Man you need this more than me."
It just don't get more real than that.
I keep getting inarticulate emails from one of the authors of this article, Peter Dreier, E.P. "Mullet" Clapp Distinguished Professor of Politics at Occidental College.
"You are one fucked up dude," says Professor Dreier, the E.P. "Guppy" Clapp Distiguished Professor of Politics at Occidental College.
Professor Dreier's concept of politics sounds like a relic of the primal horde: With hundreds of ACORN members attending, and one member shouting through a bullhorn, ACORN took over the meeting before police hauled them out of the room.
Left-wing "community" hustlers like E.P. "Meathead" Clapp Distinguished Professor of Politics Peter Dreier always love mob rule until a better armed right-wing mob appears and reminds them of the virtues of "politics as usual."
If you want to call what you do "politics," then elect somebody to the school board instead of just breaking up the meetings! But maybe that's too much to expect from the resentful and ineffectual minions of ACORN and BUILD.
Sorry for the ill-tempered words this afternoon. Things were going wrong and I overacted everywhere I went. Have to apologize to the school principal too. No I didn't call him cynical or 'nuthin.
My point was the same as quentin's, expressed very...destructively. Of course the article is a subdued endorsement and promotion for Obama. Haven't seen The Wire and don't know Atlas and Dreier, but everyone's entitled to their opinion, and obviously they have a podium. Isn't that what CD does, cast a net for articles that may be of interest here?
I could identify with the authors' description of the characters though, similar to how I regard series like the Soprano's (which I've never seen) and movies like the Godfather and Scarface (which I have.) There's a whole bunch more in that genre, and I haven't seen any of them, 'cause I'm not entertained by watching gangsters and thugs. I understand other's enjoyment though, and that's fine, as I haven't heard about a statistical spike of mafia-style crime in middle-class America.
Indie, there was a show on PBS about that blighted portion of DC with a foul industrial sewer of a river running through it. A bunch of young black people got involved in cleaning it up, and their spiritual and energetic leader was becoming an educated environmental technician. The guy looked for real, and the story came to production because he had attracted so much attention. Before the taping was completed, he was killed violently because of something happening there in the hood. That was real too, and I felt, several hundred miles away, that something had been taken from us, from me.
The Wire is about the institutions of Balitimore and how drug dealers, policemen, teachers, politicians, etc interact and meander around said institutions. So now we cant praise a tale of fiction because he left out the "good people." Even though he gets drug dealers, policemen, politicians, etc. the Wire is wrong and morbid because activists are missing. Even though "good people" exists in Baltimore yet the crime and conditions depicted in the Wire exists and persists in the real Baltimore . Why is that? because the institutions that Simon talked about is so strong and malleable they are hard to penetrate and transform. Ironically if Simon would have expanded the role of the church and created a local activist group then people would be talking about how contrived and "Hollywood" the Wire is.
monkeyangst I missed your comment earlier. That's beyond ironic; that's sardonic.
To the comment:
"It appears that, as we usher the Bush era out the door, Americans may be ready to feel hopeful again, reflected in the broad appeal of Barack Obama's campaign, who after graduating from Columbia University became a community organizer in Chicago."
Please let it be so, but I fear the Bush era will be hanging on for many years to come...the drums of a new war are beating with Fallon gone, with Cheney in Israel, with the Bill of Rights fading before our eyes. It will not surprise me if there is a false flag, here or in Israel...where upon the missiles fly...and the economy is thrust deeper into depth...and only benefiting are the war profiteers and hijackers of the government.
I could use a dose of hope...I pray that our hopes are answered.
I would like to weigh in with my opinion.
First of all, I think it is false to give any fictional television show the power to lead or mislead its audience. I don't believe a television show can accommodate the intellect of everyone who might watch the show. Simon is charged with "[buttressing] the myth that the poor, especially the black poor in the city's ghettos, are drug dealers or users, eternally helpless victims, unable to engage in collective self-help and dependent on government largess, or crime, to survive." However, The Wire, like its predecessor, also from David Simon, Homicide: Life on the Street, assumes an intelligent audience, one that has the critical thinking skills to assess that this show, albeit "realistic", does not in fact portray the entire reality.
The Wire attempts, one could argue, to be more art than entertainment, one that seeks, like all good drama, to inspire empathy in the viewer, which I believe it does remarkably well and in so doing, does more to destroy the above stated myth than perpetrate it. It does so by being biased towards, and giving a great deal of sympathetic attention to, its chosen subjects, the networks of law enforcement and drug dealers. I think it does what Simon intends, inspires its audience, an intelligent, critically thinking audience, to action. Who wouldn't be after watching the characters of Wallace and D'Angelo Barksdale torn between what they know and what they desire?
When questioning the absence of activism in the show, one could just as easily question the absence of drug addicts. Bubbles is the only addict regularly portrayed, and really only to the degree that he serves the purposes of law enforcement. Relatively little is said about the lives and choices of addicts, but in the grand scheme of things, aren't their stories pretty fundamental?
The reality is, Simon, and the other producers and writers, made an artistic choice, to tell the stories of some and exclude others. Furthermore, what makes Simon an effective storyteller is the way he, and his crew, pay attention to the minutiae of human character. The cop and drug dealer scenario is in some respects, merely a vehicle for portraying the human condition. The subject matter just happens to be one that Simon is very familiar with due to his journalistic endeavors. Simon is not obligated artistically or otherwise to portray the City of Baltimore in its entirety, nor can he do so within the confines of a weekly hour-long show.
The Wire is cynical and bleak and I would venture to assume that much of The Wire's audience, including myself, currently feels cynical about the drug war. The show artfully reflects this feeling, as have many shows before it. However, the show's lack of activist stories does not have any effect on my ability to hope for change. I have more sense than that, as I hope the critically thinking portions of the audience do too. Those who can't think beyond what's put in front of them on the screen, cannot be helped by the introduction of hard-working activists into the story and with the addition, may in fact be led to believe that the work is already being taken care of and they need not lift a finger.
Lastly, it would be a blessing to watch a show about the intricacies of inner city activism, and all the varied choices that humans make in those circumstances. I think somebody should make that show and those that feel so passionately about the absence of activism from The Wire, should certainly venture to make it. There's plenty of room on television for the gritty, cynical Wire and its hopeful counterpart.
fiction tv, fiction war. both have their consequences, real or imagined.
Television portrays cultures in a fictitious way, dismissing the reality that it is not conductive to our progressive society. Extensively, communities such as Gays and African Americans have fought for the same equal treatment that has been taken advantage of by the majority, only to find their efforts descent by stereotype-promoting dramas and situation comedies. There are many individuals who do not believe at least most of the traits of characters who are based off of stereotypes from shows such as Good Times, Sanford and Son, and Will and Grace. Although our society has come a long way in its acceptance of people from all backgrounds, our entertainment has yet a long way to go. Let’s take the new CW television program for an instance. The TV show, “Easy Money,” is scheduled to premiere on Sunday, October 5, where they criticize their next target; payday loan companies. It portrays a similar objective as Sanford and Son and Will and Grace, airing a show that speaks about the industry in such a tedious way allowing our society to acquire a distorted picture of a legitimate business model. This could definitely lead to extreme measures such as Ohio’s HB 545, which will result in thousands of lost jobs and a further devastated economy. This provides additional proof that we can’t rely on Hollywood to learn about the world around us.
Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store
Professional Blogging Team
Feed Back: 1-866-641-3406
Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html
Blog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/