Common Dreams NewsCenter
National Conference for Media Reform
 
     
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
     
 

Discuss this story Discuss this story Print This Post Print This Post E-Mail This Article
 
 

KBR Named In Report On Soldier Illnesses

Dozens of U.S. troops in Iraq fell sick at bases using “unmonitored and potentially unsafe” water supplied by the military and a contractor once owned by Vice President Dick Cheney’s former company, the Pentagon’s internal watchdog says.0310 01

A report obtained by The Associated Press said soldiers experienced skin abscesses, cellulitis, skin infections, diarrhea and other illnesses after using discolored, smelly water for personal hygiene and laundry at five U.S. military sites in Iraq.

The Defense Department’s inspector general’s report, which could be released as early as Monday, found water quality problems between March 2004 and February 2006 at three sites run by contractor KBR Inc., and between January 2004 and December 2006 at two military-operated locations.

It was impossible to link the dirty water definitively to all the illnesses, according to the report. But it said KBR’s water quality “was not maintained in accordance with field water sanitary standards” and the military-run sites “were not performing all required quality control tests.”

The report said KBR took corrective steps and was providing adequate water quality by November 2006. But military units at the two sites they controlled were still failing to perform required quality control tests and maintain appropriate records by that time.

“Therefore, water suppliers exposed U.S. forces to unmonitored and potentially unsafe water,” at the military sites by late 2006, the report said.

The problems did not extend to troops’ drinking water, but rather to water used for washing, bathing, shaving and cleaning. Water used for hygiene and laundry must meet minimum safety standards under military regulations because of the potential for harmful exposure through the eyes, nose, mouth, cuts and wounds.

The KBR sites were Camp Ar Ramadi, Camp Q-West and Camp Victory. The military sites were Logistics Support Area Anaconda and Camp Ali.

The inspector general’s study confirmed AP reports on the contaminated water in early 2006 and provided additional details on the scope of the problem at the Iraq bases. In January that year, interviews and internal company documents disclosed the problems at Ar Ramadi and showed that KBR employees could not get the company to inform base residents.

Halliburton Co., then KBR’s parent company, disputed the allegations even though they were made by its own employees and documented in company e-mails. In March 2006, the AP obtained an internal Halliburton report that, in one instance, the company missed contamination that could have caused “mass sickness or death” at Ar Ramadi.

The report said the event at Ar Ramadi could have been prevented if KBR’s reverse osmosis units on the site had been assembled, instead of relying on the military’s water production facilities.

Halliburton is the oil services conglomerate that Cheney once led. Congressional Democrats long have complained that KBR has benefited from its former ties to Cheney.

KBR, responding to the inspector general’s report, said its water treatment “has met or exceeded all applicable military and contract standards.” The company took exception to many of the inspector general’s assertions. “KBR’s commitment to the safety of all of its employees remains unwavering,” the company said in a statement to the AP.

KBR provided water treatment to U.S. troops under a large-scale defense contract that also included housing and food to soldiers in Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait, Djbouti and Georgia.

The military has “taken the appropriate measures to correct the problem and ensure we provide the appropriate oversight of the system,” said Navy Capt. James Graybeal of the U.S. Central Command, which oversees U.S. troops in the Middle East.

North Dakota Sen. Byron Dorgan, who has led Democratic inquiries into contracting abuses in Iraq, said the inspector general has backed up what those earlier hearings uncovered. “KBR was not doing its job” and U.S. forces had water that did not meet Army standards, Dorgan said.

“I think it’s outrageous that KBR tried to deny that there was a problem, especially when it turned out that there were dozens of U.S. troops reporting water-related illnesses,” he said.

The inspector general investigated the 2006 reports at Dorgan’s request.

The inspector general’s report said some troops noticed problems with the water. Between October 2004 and May 2005, troops at Camp Ar Ramadi said bathwater was discolored and had an unusual odor. The report said KBR failed to treat the nonpotable water and monitor water quality during the same period.

At Camp Q-West, KBR inappropriately delivered chlorinated wastewater for showers and latrines without informing military preventive medicine officials, the report said. “KBR did not monitor or record the quality of water at point-of-use containers before April 2006, even though the … contract required the company to do so,” the report added.

Medical records for troops at Camp Q-West indicated 38 cases of illnesses commonly attributed to problem water. These include skin abscesses, cellulitis, skin infections and diarrhea. Doctors diagnosed 24 of the cases in January and February 2006, the same period when medical officials warned of a rise in bacterial infections at the base.

In addition, military medical records - tied to no particular base in Iraq - showed 26 cases of food and waterborne diseases, including hepatitis, giardiasis and typhoid fever.

© 2008 Associated Press

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Technorati
 

9 Comments so far

  1. truthmonger March 10th, 2008 11:03 am

    Too much to say about this article. I’ll just comment on the sign hanging on their fence. I had to read it twice. Their thoughts and prayers are with their employees, not our soldiers or anyone else. I bet their employees aren’t crapping their pants or barfing from drinking water. They’re probably brushing their teeth using $100/bottle wine. Time to throw out all the contractors (and why not bring the troops home while we’re at it.)

  2. Mike Corbeil March 10th, 2008 11:36 am

    Here’s an article providing considerable history on KBR and its Big Time contracting with the U.S. govt, and starting with KBR having financed Lyndon B. Johnson in the 1940s.

    “Martial Law, Inc.
    KBR: A Halliburton Subsidiary

    by Andrew G. Marshall

    Global Research, March 5, 2008″

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8258

  3. andersdl March 10th, 2008 1:05 pm

    Since the Bush administration cut veterans medical benefits, the US gov. won’t have to spend as much treating soldiers that KBR injured, and you can bet KBR won’t be held liable.

    KBR only cares about the revenue stream from the next 100 years in Iraq that McCain talked about.

  4. gde March 10th, 2008 1:44 pm

    I have mixed feelings about this. If all US military and contractor personnel had to live under the same conditions, including water supply, medical care, electrical power, and food, the Iraqis would be a lot better off in the long run. Either the US would leave (by far most likely), or they would finally make a real commitment to fixing problems. As it is now, they only pay lip service to making things better.

  5. thomas j hussey March 10th, 2008 4:13 pm

    Now who is the former CEO of Halliburton, now moonlighting as Vice-President of the U.S., who is benefiting financially from this?

  6. Mike Corbeil March 10th, 2008 5:07 pm

    ” thomas j hussey March 10th, 2008 4:13 pm

    Now who is the former CEO of Halliburton, now moonlighting as Vice-President of the U.S., who is benefiting financially from this?”

    SEE THE globalresearch.ca article linked in my above post. The above-quoted rhetorical question and much enough more is well covered; and it’s another good look at who some of people of the hidden and real ruling elites league are.

    To them soldiers mean no more than what was purportedly cited from Henry Kissinger’s view of the military, when he replied that soldiers are just ‘dumb animals’, only good for serving the will or desires of the ruling elites. They, soldiers, are therefore easy to dispense of when no longer of service value; very expendable, to the elites.

  7. MisoPretty March 10th, 2008 7:48 pm

    KBR’s CEOs need to be executed as war criminals

  8. NateW March 10th, 2008 10:42 pm

    KBR has joined the ranks of the companies that provided faulty guns to the Union Army during the Civil War & embalmed beef to soldiers during the Spanish-American War. Said companies were the worst sort of war profiteer, providing inferior products and using political connections and bribes to get away with it. Sadly, it would appear that American history is repeating itself with KBR.

  9. WmC March 11th, 2008 7:31 am

    Why the American flag in the photo? Shouldn’t it be the national flag of the Cayman Islands, since that’s where KBR’s headquarters are?

Join the discussion:

You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)

 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org