EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
US Plotted To Overthrow Hamas After Election Victory
The Bush administration, caught out by the rise of Hamas, embarked on a secret project for the armed overthrow of the Islamist government in Gaza, it emerged yesterday.
Vanity Fair reports in its April edition that President George Bush and the secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, signed off on a plan for the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, to remove the Hamas authorities in Gaza. The plan called for Washington's allies in the region to funnel arms and salaries to Fatah fighters who would lead a rising against Hamas.
But the project was controversial even within the administration, the magazine reports. "There were severe fissures among neoconservatives over this," David Wurmser, a former Middle East adviser to the vice-president, Dick Cheney, told the magazine. "We were ripping each other to pieces."
Wurmser resigned his post in the vice-president's office in July 2007, only weeks after bloody clashes in Gaza between Hamas and Fatah that led to the Islamist organisation taking total control of the territory. "It looks to me that what happened wasn't so much a coup by Hamas but an attempted coup by Fatah that was pre-empted before it could happen," he said.
The Bush administration plan sought to undo the results of elections in the West Bank and Gaza in January 2006 which, to the chagrin of White House and State Department officials, saw Hamas win a majority of seats in the Palestinian legislature.
The project was approved by Bush, Rice, and Elliott Abrams, the hawkish deputy national security adviser.
The 2006 election result was seen as an affront to the central premise of the Bush administration's policy in the Middle East - that democratic elections would inexorably lead to pro-western governments.
With the victory of Hamas, Rice moved swiftly to try to persuade Abbas to take steps to dissolve the Hamas authority in Gaza. When Abbas did not move quickly enough, the US consul general in Jerusalem, Jake Walles, was despatched to Ramallah to deliver a curt reminder.
The magazine quotes a memo for Walles's meeting with Hamas as saying: "You should make clear your intention to declare a state of emergency and form an emergency government."
The central man figure in Washington's plan was Mohammed Dahlan, who had been Yasser Arafat's security chief in Gaza and who had established close ties with the CIA as early as the 1990s. The magazine cites three unidentified US officials quoting Bush as saying: "He's our guy."
According to the magazine, Rice played a main role in trying to persuade Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates to offer training and funding to the Fatah fighters. Israeli officials admitted in December 2006 that Egypt had sent weapons to the Fatah faction in Gaza.
The US effort did not end with the establishment of a Palestinian national unity government. Vanity Fair describes the administration's plan B, which called for adding 4,700 new Fatah troops with additional training in Jordan and Egypt.
A state department memo put the cost for salaries, training and weapons at $1.27bn (£640m) over five years.
© 2008 The Guardian
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

77 Comments so far
Show AllHi corvo
"kendpotter: Now before you start yammering ....."
I would never yammer ;)
"let me turn your attention to Genesis 18:16-33. If that kind of behavior is good enough for God, it's probably what the rest of us will suffer from our fellow world citizens some day."
My favorite part of the Bible is where Jesus asks us to treat the least among us as if that person were Jesus (I don't remember the exact quote). I truly wish the religious right would remember His teachings and not just the Old Testament.
I am a student of history. I would like to be able to convince people that we are headed in the wrong direction and that we should take lessons from history so that we won't have to repeat it. Unfortunately, a great many of the people in this country don't know any history and are quite proud of it. I don't know where this anti-intellectualism comes from but Bush couldn't have been elected any other way. I don't know that we can turn this country around short of the sort of disasters you seem to think necessary. I will continue to hope so and try my best to do so.
Bush's "short history". "WAR Is Peace, Freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength" George Orwell's Ministry of Truth.
And Obama wants to follow in Bush's footsteps by continuing to shun Hamas. The Israeli lobby clearly has control of politicians in this country.
"We were ripping each other to pieces."
If that were true this would be a better world.
To quote Talleyrand: "Worse than a crime - a blunder!"
Well this pretty much vindicates Hamas for their actions against the US stooge fatah in Gaza last year. If only they could have been successful in Ramallah too.
Like Amy does in Democracy Now, we must expose the lies and hypocracy at every turn. Never utter the word "Hamas" without putting the words "democratically elected" in front of it. Also, never utter the phrase "war on terror" without putting the phrase "so-called" in front of it.
"We were ripping each other to pieces"
Duh and double duh. When your philosphy is so contradicting, then in the end, you rip yourselves apart.
Humanity can do better.
Hamas was brought to power by the Palestinian people in free and fair elections.
The U.S. call for democracy in the Arab world is a hollow and fraudulent endeavor.
So three great revalations today:
1. Fatah actually working for the CIA,
2. Obama assures Harper-Tory Canadians that his talk of renegotiating NAFTA is just so much BS being fed the midwest US electorate.
3. Our brave trooops like to throw helpless puppys off cliffs. (Google it to view it)
vote nader
Boy, the news organs ARE shutting down in the US aren't they. He're outside the asylum, we read about this and saw it on TV news in June 2007. Perhaps next you will be reading about the moon landings.
For those of you relying on American news, I'll fill you in on what I can remember. The Hamas government had just won the election in the occupied territories. Jimmy Carter and other respected observers declared the election free and fair. Naturally, America allotted around, I think it was fifty million dollars for weapons to be given to the losers, Fatah, These were mostly rifles, in other words guns that were only good for killing fellow Palestinians and not useful against US F-16s and Israeli tanks. Naturally, The elected Palestinian government didn't like that. There was a fight. Hamas won, again, albeit only in Gaza. The divide and conquer goal of Rice's "diplomacy" was successful. Fast forward to March 2008 and someone at Vanity Fair, apparently, discovers an old foreign newspaper clipping and voila, you have an article fit for Vanity Fair.
Throwing puppies off cliffs and piling prisoners naked into pyramids.
Fuck this warrior worship.
People who willingly go into combat are either sadists or fools.
Buffy St Marie had it right.
Meanwhile Bush would have us believe of the terrorists that "THEY hate our freedoms." By gosh, for once I agree with the guy when we see this ignoble variety of "our freedoms!"
Why does the phrase 'Iran Conra' come to mind?
And why mention Obama? - any new president will orchestrate his/her own foreign policy fuck ups! Think three possible openings on the Supreme Court, think media consolidation, think net neutrality. Oh yeah, I want habeus corpus back too. Who you gonna call?
Yeah Ragdoll,Bush figures if he takes away all of our freedoms the terrorists will not hate us anymore.
This is an easy one for BushCo...I can see them sitting around the Oval Office now:
RICE: "Hmmm, how will we spin this? Hey junior spinmeister, wanna crack at it?"
JR: "Sure...let's see, Hamas are terrorists, therefore we're justified in overturning the election"
RICE: "Good job sonnie, you're a real quick learner arentcha".
BTW, this kind of MO is par for the course for USA, Dem and Repub,...see the book Overthrow by Steve Kinzer.
This is all standard fare, by US foreign policy standards. We only have to go back to the Mossadeq government in Iran, the support of Sadaam Hussein, Musharref in Pakistan, the list is pretty much endless.
I have no doubts, that if we picked a Prime Minister in the UK, who wanted to change the "special relationship", then he would be overthrown.
We tried to rig the election before it happened.
Then we tried to overturn the election results after it happened.
This is not even close to "leading by example" on the issue of democracy.
Shame on our American leaders. Shame on the monopoly media. Shame on American citizens for consuming the crap that our leaders and monopoly media are feeding us.
AndyUK - Aye, aye. Seems that current middle east episodes are largely related to 1953 when we (U.S.), with incoming Eisenhower and the Dulles brothers, finally agreed to Churchill's plea for help overthrowing Mossadeq. We gave Iran the Shah (who, of course was only our guy for awhile). Funny how people get mad when we do stuff like that. I just learned how UK controlled all of Iran's oil at the time. Hmmph. I live in San Francisco. Latest gas price board in my neighborhood: $3.99 (and 9/10). At least we're not at $4.00 yet.
Is there any country in the world more interfering than the US? Why can't we just leave other countries alone? Amy Goodman did a story about how the 4 million in "aid" we give to Bolivia is being used to overthrow the democratically elected president there. It's making me sick to live in this country.
And the beat goes on !
Russian Syrian ties are growing.
CIA-US attempts to subvert democracy are recognized quickly now. No more Mossadeq's, which cost the CIA about a million dollars, and was a 'coup' a fait accompli before the vicims knew what hit them.
Global awareness is light years beyond that everywhere now.
Eff Fatah, to be polite.
It is gonna be a while to decide who to vote for but many here are predicting that Obama will not try to talk to Hamas or get Israel to talk about a truce too.
Well See about that.
Just once I wish my nation's foreign policy wasn't so monumentally retarded.
USAn March 4th, 2008 12:01 pm
"Also, never utter the phrase "war on terror" without putting the phrase "so-called" in front of it."
I always call it the U.S. war of terror.
Published on Tuesday, March 4, 2008 by The Guardian/UK
US Plotted To Overthrow Hamas After Election Victory
Exactly who in the [US] did the plotting and who would carry it out? Seems to me this is a tradition with the executive and covert branches of our government. Overthrowing democratically elected governments. Isn't there laws against this? And isn't there someone supposed to enforce the laws?
If another nation had done this it would be labeled as terrorism. It is state sponsored terrorism.
is this supposed to be news?
duh
jlocke is correct to criticize the media but he has this wrong...it was more than an article. It was an investigative report and a very good one. Members of Hamas, Fatah (Dahlan...specifically), and US government officials were interviewed. The sad thing is that you can't read reporting like this in the New York Times or Washington Post...it has to come from Vanity Fair. Pathetic. You can read the 8 page story online. It is very good. Most American's attention span is only two minutes so nobody will probably read it.
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/04/gaza200804
Vanity fair broke a taboo here...that is what makes it so good. Americans are not supposed to hear from Palestinians. Their voices are to be silenced here. Otherwords the average joe might start thinking for himself. Americans are kept in the dark so that when things happen in the world...they won't know why until our political leaders tell them...that way rather than hearing the story from the participants perspective (the people actual engaged in the crisis). They believe what our leaders want them to believe. That Fatah was just going about its business...and the US goverment was just going about its business...and suddely these savage barbarian Hamas people from out of nowhere staged a bloody revolt. And the Fox news responds with outrage...and declares...What will our government to do stop this!!! When or course they caused the whole catastrophe!!! This is the whole purpose of information control.
I specifically remember the New York times not printing Ramzi Yousef's statement at his sentencing hearing because it "would give a voice" to terrorism. Enough people complained that they wound up printing at the back of section B at a later date. I mean after all...why would anybody want to know why an Arab man would want to blow up the twin towers...its not like they would try it again or anything...oh...whoops...forgot.
http://www.wanniski.com/showarticle.asp?articleid=1619
And George is my shepherd
I shall never fear
He makith me to lie
Down in (someone else's) green pastures.
Genocide and this Neo-Holocaust will continue
unto complete surrender of all Palestinean
hopes and lands. The world's quintessential
rogue states will never comply with U.N. Resolution 242.
When there's a discussion of what's happening in Gaza, one of the things one always hear is that the Palestinians are wrong for trying to use violence to resist.
But what choice have we left them?
When they had elections, we attempted to rig the elections in advance and favored the corrupt PA. After we didn't like the election results, we attempted to overthrow the elected government. And if the Palestinians were to try to non-violently protest this, there's a) no one who would listen nor pay attention, and b) if they did it anywhere near Israeli troops they'd be shot down in the streets.
So, what options is the world leaving them besides them arming themselves and striking back anyway they can?
If you want non-violence, you have to leave the door open to non-violent change. That's supposed to be the reason for elections. They aren't supposed to be some feel-good event that puts into power exactly who the powerful want in power. Elections are supposed to be the opportunity for freedom and democracy to work to allow a society to create the course the members of that society desire.
Of course, if you have freedom and democracy, the first thing Gazan society would demand is the end of the occupation and their own sovereign state. All the current violence stems from the root cause of Israel wanting this land and deciding to take it and hold it with violence. That's the truth of today. If the Palestinians were to have their own free and sovereign state and were to use that to attack Israel, then we could blame them and talk about Israel's right to exist. But with the situation today, we are talking entirely about Israel's violent land grab. That's the root cause of all the violence by all sides of this now three-way battle.
@USAn March 4th, 2008 12:01 pm
"Never utter the word "Hamas" without putting the words "democratically elected" in front of it. Also, never utter the phrase "war on terror" without putting the phrase "so-called" in front of it."
Never utter the word terrorism alone without prefixing, i.e. "State Terrorism" or "Non State Terrorism" :-
"Terrorism: The unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives." - FBI.
This is typical of MOST definitions of terrorism in that the actor is a terrorist whether it/he/she is a state or a non state and whether or not low tech destruction (e.g. home made bombs) or high tech destruction (stealth bombers with DU payload or cluster bombs) are used.
Since Gaza rightfully belongs to the Palestinians, what is the IDF doing there? Neither agency is respecting the political boundries established after the Arab-Israeli war (which Israel won). The people in Gaza live in poverty and misery. The only time they see Israelis is when they are being pushed around or attacked.
(the poor man finally cannot take anymore and he picks up a brick to throw at the aggressors. he is then shot dead for his efforts)
I have been to Israel. I walked down the street alone in Haifa and never felt afraid. It is a nice place and the people are kind. I have also been to the UAE and walked down the street alone in Dubai and never felt threatened. The people there were kind and it was a beautiful place also. The Israeli people are NOT the problem, neither are the Palestinians. The problem is the Israeli political policies mirror those of the USA. (Aggressive, violent, irrational, with no respect for foreign culture or differences) The political policies routinely walk all over the Palestinians. Then we have the gall to ask "Why do they hate us?".
Compounding the problem is the method in which the Palestinians make war. The suicide bombings are contrary to Israeli and American religious belief.
Israel must make the first step to peace. Israel is the aggressor and the violator. Once they make a serious foreign policy change, Lebanon must follow suit. As long as the referee (USA) is siding with the Israelis, the conflict will never be resolved.
This article and Vanity Fair gives us the impression that this "plan" was never actually carried out.
BS! Nothing could be furhter from the truth. Why not report it like it is? It is altogether obvious that this plan was carried out, and just look at all the damage it has done!
From AP:
"Gaza Strip - About 25 Israeli armored vehicles rumbled into southern Gaza and clashed with militants after nightfall Tuesday. A 1-month-old baby was killed in the crossfire, a medical official said."
Condi will need to wait for the Palestineans to finish burying their martyrs before she demands unconditional surrender to the Zionists.
dboylon says:
I specifically remember the New York times not printing Ramzi Yousef's statement at his sentencing hearing because it "would give a voice" to terrorism. Enough people complained that they wound up printing at the back of section B at a later date. I mean after all…why would anybody want to know why an Arab man would want to blow up the twin towers…its not like they would try it again or anything…oh…whoops…forgot.
http://www.wanniski.com/showarticle.asp?articleid=1619
++++++++++
What we don't know is whether Ramzi Yousef admitted to having had anything to do with 9/11.
But what struck me when I used the above site link, were the memos written to Cheney and others by Wanniski. What Ramzi Yousef justifiably and reasonably says in his statement is ignored. DENIAL that the U.S. and the disaster capitalists and the Israeli Zionist contingent and the mega-mega world-wealth controllers and the military insanities wherever they are have any culpability for the state of our current world is thicker than the measurement of every person on this globe stacked up to the moon or however far that stack would reach.
++++++++++++++++++++++++
dboylon also says:
Vanity fair broke a taboo here…that is what makes it so good. Americans are not supposed to hear from Palestinians. Their voices are to be silenced here. Otherwords the average joe might start thinking for himself. Americans are kept in the dark so that when things happen in the world…they won't know why until our political leaders tell them…that way rather than hearing the story from the participants perspective (the people actual engaged in the crisis). They believe what our leaders want them to believe.
+++++++++++++++++++
Of course, but I disagree that the information isn't readily available.
Just this morning as I read financial analyses, including an article ... that the CRASH has already occurred and it's downhill for THE PEOPLE from here ... try $10 for a loaf of bread ... [the Big Boy Capitalists and Corporations already have their loot socked away and are reaping in more] and then I scooted over to this site and that site with real news and analyses by very well-credentialed sources around the world, I've learned enough to know that we are confronting true DOOMSDAY scenarios teetering on a fault line.
And yet what I read in many essays and in many comments are statements that begin with: They shouldn't do this ... They ought to do this ... Gee, that's against the law ...
That's like spittin' into a hurricane wind comin' at your face.
The symbolic and maybe real hurricanes, the tornadoes, the tsunamis, the earthquakes, the avalanches, the flood waters, the drought conditions are all gathering power ... and then there's a matter of the craziest bunch of people who ever had power to give the orders to spring the nukes ...
The information is available to any American who can read and has a little curiosity ...
There's a big picture here ... not a little one, and everything of true, self-serving nastiness is interconnected and foreshadowing DOOMSDAY scenarios ...
But on the bright everything on this beautiful earth is interconnected too, including people ... So instead of "They shouldn't do this..." "They ought to do this ..." perhaps the more important thing is what are we going to do; what am I going to do; what are you going to do?
Words are easy to write and to speak ... Actions and deeds for the good of self, for the care of your families and friends, for the stranger ... are what speak volumes. The future is coming fast ...
peace ...
"we do it over there so they cant do it over here" or something like that
Anyway, when will they stop F'ng around in EVERYONE else's business??
why we are not in the streets in overwhelming #'s is beyond me.....
If Hamas is a terrorist organization, what is wrong with supporting their opposition?
If Hamas were voted into power in America, occupied the white house and congress, would things be better?
hhhhhhmmmmmmmm, where can we reach these guys?
My blog is entitled: Destructive Creation. It refers to mankind.
We will, eventually, and probably sooner rather than later, destroy ourselves and our world. We have enough weapons to destroy whole universes.
We humans are deranged. We have a death wish. We love to destroy. We love to kill. Unfortunately our 'intelligence' is not enough to save us from ourselves.
www.dangerouscreation.com
Imagine how this headline would have played out had it been on the cover of the NYT and the WaPo, instead of the Guardian.
kelmer
"Throwing puppies off cliffs and piling prisoners naked into pyramids. Fuck this warrior worship.
People who willingly go into combat are either sadists or fools."
Wrongo - The military is a pretty good cross-section of this society. The military contains fools and sadists just like this country. Just like this country, the military contains many fine people. You want to spout a generality? Fine, but like any generality it contains a germ of truth and a great deal of nonsense.
please pardon me for the duplicate postings.
seems that a glitch occurred and my first post did not appear when i refreshed this page until after i tried again and the second one showed.
xox + only all good 2 U all,
Only in Solidarity do "We have it in our power to begin the world again"-Tom Paine
Eileen Fleming,
Reporter and Editor WAWA:
http://www.wearewideawake.org/
Author "Keep Hope Alive" and "Memoirs of a Nice Irish American 'Girl's' Life in Occupied Territory"
Producer "30 Minutes With Vanunu" and "13 Minutes with Vanunu"
dboylon March 4th, 2008 2:31 pm:
"Vanity fair broke a taboo here…that is what makes it so good. Americans are not supposed to hear from Palestinians."
Hi dboylon, this is a quote from the Vanity Fair article:
---
With few good options left, the administration now appears to be rethinking its blanket refusal to engage with Hamas. Staffers at the National Security Council and the Pentagon recently put out discreet feelers to academic experts, asking them for papers describing Hamas and its principal protagonists. "They say they won't talk to Hamas," says one such expert, "but in the end they're going to have to. It's inevitable."
---
dboylon, this paragraph might explain why, as you say ""Vanity fair broke a taboo here". VF has permission from the US government to talk to insiders and change the public narrative so that future US moves vis-Ã -vis the Palestinians make sense to Americans, at least superficially.
The US has to prepare the stage for talks with the "savage barbarian" as you say. Either that or it is another feint. It's difficult isn't it to get inside the head of the Bush government. Just when you think that they have no alternative but to do the sensible thing, they create a whole new disaster out of virtually nowhere.
By the way, I agree it is a good piece in Vanity Fair. My comment, as you evidently understand, is that information, like this, needs to be delivered when it most benefits the citizens and not at a time of the government's choosing.
AndyUK
"This is all standard fare, by US foreign policy standards. We only have to go back to the Mossadeq government in Iran, the support of Sadaam Hussein, Musharref in Pakistan, the list is pretty much endless."
Unfortunately, all together too true. We talk a good game about promoting democracy, but any student of history (as you obviously are) can easily see the difference between talk and application.
I am no fan of Hamas, but people deserve the goevernment they elect. Our own country is afflicted (like the plague) by a leader we didn't elect - twice. And see where we are today because of it. Even our long-standing best friends , the Brits, Aussies, and Canadians think we're a bunch of lunatics, religous fanatics, and war-mongerers. I hope we can right these wrongs before our international relations are irreparably harmed.
Commenting on "Roman freedom" Plutarch sarcastically said that the subjects never have more freedom than that conceded by the Roman empire. Isn't it very true with regards to "American democracy" and "American freedom"? Palestine is one of the examples.
Are we ever going to a bunch of politicians inside the Beltway who have any solution other than to supply somebody else with arms to kill, kill, kill those whom ghey perceive to be our enemies? When can we expect to have public policy makers who are not blood-thirsty?
"We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehoods in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its own people." John Fitzgerald Kennedy
I am heartened to see the majority of folks here condemn the actions of the Bush administration, and our Congress should be included in that condemnation, for its attempts to subvert another free election and alter the results of that election when it turned out not to their liking.
The real question that we should be posing here, in my opinion, is how do we restore the kind of nation in which such actions do not occur? I knw that many if not most of you are confirmed two party addicts and think that by electing either Barak Obama or Hillary Clinton we shall see the nation miraculously restored to its rightful place as a moral leader. Further, with a Democratic majority in the Legislature and a Democratic President in the White House it will rain candy and nuts on us all.
I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings but, after the elections and the passing of the Government into other hands, the same folks will still, as ever, be in charge. It is sad to me that so few understand the differences between the two parties are really quite trivial in the main and neither represents a path to restoring the moral and ethical center in our dealings with our friends and neighbors, our opponents and economic rivals, or even in giving our own citizenry a fair shake.
As you might surmise by now I am a third party guy, I seek to elect those politicians pledged to shun corporate monies and the subsequent influence that money brings over our legislation and direction. It is sad that many, far too many, understand the difference in governance that third parties represent but think that path too slow by far, that a vote for Nader or McKinney is a wasted vote. I believe that a vote for Obama or Clinton is a wasted vote frankly, that neither represents real change at all. The sooner the electorate understands that they are really secondary in the minds of a politican once elected, that his/her thoughts turn immediately to what must be done to generate the corporate funding for a re-election campaign and , ultimately, an after politics job as a six or seven figure lobbyist the sooner we can bring about real change in this country.
"Where men build on false ground, the more they build, the greater is the ruin." Hobbes, Leviathon
The best thing that could come out of this would be some criminal prosecutions for persons who violate their oath of office. We have tended to treat all that sort of thing as political questions left to voters, but that assumes that people need some leeway to exercise their best judgment on difficult questions. That approach assumes too much honesty on the part of the oath taker. The entire Iraq situation is the result of calculated lies meant to use the powers of state, the military and others government offices, to pad favored pockets. The wide spread corruption involving, say construction defects in the US embassy in Baghdad, should be no surprise and should instead be seen as those closest to the core acting like those they deal with, eg, proof of corruption. By using the powers of state to accomplish this, the full faith and credit of the USA insures that the money will be paid. Paid towards corruption rather than to provide good educations, safe infrastructure, modern medical services, etc. What results is a way of keeping tax payers forever in debt hitched with a chain to the cart and unwilling and unable to pay for services which are needed. It's a sabotage plan. Certain elites mean to establish socialism for themselves while they taunt us with the conservative line.
This isn't political policy disagreement. It's criminal. Criminal because they took oathes and made promises intending to merely cast them aside. This doesn't portend the evils of a French Revolution because most are honest and well-intended. But there's a couple of hundred who need to be incarcerated in the 9th ward of New Orleans under the auspices of FEMA, stripped of all political and property rights. They deserve nothing better than they foisted on those they swore to serve and protect.
how did obama end up being the bad guy in this ? this article has nothing to do with him or how he will deal with hamas or israel.....i betcha it will be more diplomatic than bushco........
NOT just this civilian journalist reported on this very issue at the time Hamas outed Fatah from Gaza,
James M. Wall/ The Christian Century reported on the 12th of June 2007:
...The realities of U.S. military funding of Fatah and U.S. training of Fatah troops leave little doubt that the U.S. is once again choosing sides in another country's internal conflict, and once again displaying the arrogance that led to disasters in Vietnam, El Salvador, Guatemala and Iraq...
...The Western media have ignored the secret plan, focusing instead on its implementation with daily news reports of carnage between radical factions within Hamas and Dahlan's Fatah security forces.
FULL REPORT:
http://www.christiancentury.org/article.lasso?id=3436
e
http://www.wearewideawake.org/