Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Use of Radio ID Tags Faces Limits
What Signals Are Your Clothes Sending?
Paris, France - Thousands of garments in the sprawling men's department at the Galeria Kaufhof are equipped with tiny wireless chips that can forestall fashion disaster by relaying information from the garment to a dressing-room screen.
The garments in the department store, in Essen, Germany, contain radio frequency identification chips, small circuits that communicate by radio waves through portable readers and more than 200 antennas that can not only recommend a brown belt for those tweed slacks but also track garments from the racks, shelves and dressing rooms on the store's third floor.
This pioneering pilot project of the Metro Group, a retail chain in Germany, heralds a shopping experience of the future in which dress shirts can wirelessly offer accessorizing tips to shoppers. But the rapid development of RFID technology is also being regarded cautiously by the authorities in the European Union, who are moving quickly to establish privacy guidelines because the chips - and the information being collected - are not always visible.
Their goal is to raise awareness among consumers that the data-gathering chips are becoming embedded in their lives - in items like credit cards, public transportation passes, work access badges, borrowed library books and supermarket loyalty cards.
There are also policy concerns regarding whether retailers could link a customer's credit card data to an RFID tag in a product, allowing clients to be identified when they return to a store.
In late February, the European Commission issued privacy protection proposals to establish a code of conduct for companies using RFID technology, fueling a debate among privacy advocates who seek more openness and trade groups of manufacturers and retailers who want practical guidelines that will allow the developing technology to flourish.
The guidelines will be open to public comment and debate through late April. They will stop short of becoming part of actual legislation, instead offering direction to members of the European Union for developing privacy protections.
The chips, whose use dates back to radar experiments during World War II by the Germans and the British - are gaining wider acceptance among manufacturers, the transport industry and the retail trade, according to Chad Eschinger, a research director at Gartner, an information technology research company based in Stamford, Connecticut. He forecast $1.28 billion in global revenues for RFID technology in 2008, a 31 percent increase from the year before, and revenue of $3.5 billion in 2012.
Against that backdrop, regulators in Brussels are proposing a new standard that would require stores to deactivate chips at the check-out counter unless customers specifically chose to keep the tags functioning.
Privacy advocates have hailed what is known as the opt-in principle as a pioneering step by European regulators to establish clear privacy protections in connection with the technology. In February, lawmakers in the U.S. state of Washington also sought to carve out a privacy bill of rights, passing legislation in the state's House of Representatives to make it a felony for businesses to keep personal information gathered from RFID chips without consent from customers.
"For us, consumers have to be protected," said Emilie Berrau, a legal officer for the BEUC, the European Consumers Organization in Brussels. "They haven't asked for the technology, so why should they have the burden of protecting themselves?"
But some trade groups, and Metro, say they are concerned that strict guidelines will prevent retailers from adopting the technology.
EPCglobal, an international trade group formed in 2003 to pursue a common set of RFID standards, supports privacy protections, said Marisa Jimenez, public policy director for the group, based in Brussels. But the group opposes the approach being recommended.
"How can you make an assumption that consumers will want their tags deactivated at the point of sales?" she said. "How can we justify that? So far we haven't heard from consumers with day-to-day concerns. There is a distance there. This technology is developing very quickly. And if there is an opt-in approach, that will probably deter many retailers from adopting the technology."
Retailers have tended to use the chips for logistical purposes like tracking deliveries, but companies are starting to get more inventive. A British uniform supplier, Trutex, said it was developing clothing with chips to track schoolchildren, in part because of surveys that showed parents were favorable to the idea.
McDonald's has been testing an RFID ordering system in Seoul on special tables equipped with touch-pad menus and fitted with readers that allow customers to link their mobile phones and order hamburgers. The tab goes on the mobile.
When the Metro Group opened its state-of-the-chip menswear department in September, it adopted the favored industry approach - leaving it to customers to request to deactivate the tags on their purchases. The chips are now contained in a larger hanging paper tag that can easily be cut off by cashiers or customers. But in the future the chips could be housed within the garment, making it less visible.
Metro, headquartered in Düsseldorf, has placed posters and brochures in the store and each tag hanging on a garment contains a notice about the chips.
"If we have to deactivate at the check-out, then the technology is going to stay within the logistics process - to say where is a box or where is the pallet in the distribution center," said Antonia Voerste, a spokeswoman. "It won't come on consumer items. They're going to kill the technology with that."
But even without that prodding, companies are looking for ways to demonstrate their respect for privacy standards. European authorities started financing a €1.2 million, or $1.8 million, pilot project in the summer to create a trans-European "privacy seal of approval" that could be marked on products that meet independent evaluations of privacy standards and could be applied to products using RFID chips. Called the EuroPriSe Project, the program has already accepted 20 companies seeking the seal, according to the project manager, Kirsten Bock. The Independent Center for Privacy Protection in the German state of Schleswig-Holstein is coordinating the project with partners in eight other countries, taking on the lead role because the center had already developed its own regional privacy seal. Bock said it was clear there was a demand for the logos - something akin to popular seals certifying organic products or fair-trade items. The new EuroPriSe program, she said, has had to turn away more than 80 companies during its test phase. And even Schleswig-Holstein, with its regional privacy seal, managed to attract a giant from across the Atlantic seeking a seal for its software, Bock said. At a ceremony last year in Berlin, Schleswig-Holstein officials awarded the privacy seal to Microsoft for its Update 6.0 and Windows Services 2.0.
© 2008 The International Herald Tribune
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

11 Comments so far
Show All"A British uniform supplier, Trutex, said it was developing clothing with chips to track schoolchildren, in part because of surveys that showed parents were favorable to the idea."
This is why I don't/won't have children.. my child is not a chattel to be tagged and tracked for life. Soon they'll be implanting them at birth.
But it seems that these chips will be everywhere and in everything and hard to avoid even when you try.
I haven't seen the chips on used items. It's wise to buy used anyway. If we are forced to buy some new items we will need a chip detector so that we can remove them ourselves. I like the idea of a chip scrambler or one that provides bogus data.
They terrorize parents with gruesome stories of rape and murder of children. (American children, that is, not Iraqi children.)
Then parents feel that they are "protecting" their children by chipping them, although trusting Big Brother not to misuse the technology shows poor judgement, and the related turning over of biological data on children to corporations or the government is truly scary to freedom respecters.
I try to point out to parents that if a stranger kills or cripples their child, it is overwhelmingly true that they will do it with a car. Cars are the number one cause of death in Americans from birth to age 44.
Parents should be pushing for child safe sidewalks, safe urban planning, and public transportation to get the true child killers off the road.
Just microwave your new socks when you get them home. That should kill any hidden rfid tags. If any technologists out there can verify this, and recommend settings, please do.
Be afraid! Be VERY afraid!
Wash socks in dishwasher...! Dry in microwave.
"Mark of the Beast", this crap -- oh, my!
WallyWorld can already count-money in my wallet upon my entry (which, trust-Me, is Rare -- and ONLY for Aribica-coffee)...Why? What 'good' is such crappola?
I'm not sad that I am much nearer the end of my life than the begining. Pity the young!
My maternal grandfather said just before his death in 1952 (and just after he bought a television for my parents) that technology would be the ruination of the earth. This from a wonderful man that worked himself to death to raise a large family during the Great Depression.
The rights we lose... are our childrens rights. No I don't mean placing RFID tags on schoolkids. I mean developing the program to track people. Worry more about those schoolkids being tracked... when they grow up. That is the danger for our kids and us.
We in America ...we in this world ...grow increasingly afraid of freedom. Simply desiring one's privacy is coming to seem suspicious. The illusion of a benefical security based on everyone being watched becomes the delusion that we will somehow remain a free people while under a state of constant observation.
Moreover, the question remains, human nature being what it is, as to who will watch the watchers, to protect us against abuses by them? The answer is, of course, that the watchers will watch themselves. Access to all this data about everyone's lives is privileged... not to themselves (about their lives) but to someone else. Like that neighbor who is mad that you complained about his dog barking at night. Guess where he works?
Data mining firms collect everything electronic - from medical and credit data... to whom you call and who calls you, every web site you visit, every credit card purchase... every thing electronic.
What are we doing to idea of freedom? Orwellian 'freedom is security'? You will not be secure nor sadly will your children who will be watched by someone(s) from the moment of birth till they die. We begin setting up this dire illusion of security and delude ourselves that it won't end up meaning control.
SOMEONE will always be watching. Feel better now? Evidently it will be many differing someones without even the imprimatur of an invasive government! Other private individuals and corporations will have such POWER over people too. By what right? We hardly even ask anymore. By what right?
The end result will be a psychological self censorship and a fear of nonconformity. We do THAT to our children. We condemn them to being afraid to be free. To having an inherent anxiety that they must go along or be singled out and of course, an increased level of surveillance. They will grow up knowing that. Expecting that.
Those who live in glass houses understand that they are being watched... and act accordingly. They become nuts.
The freedom we lose... is the freedoms that would have belonged to our kids when they grow up. They'll have no choice by then. We condemn them, cowards that we are.
'Freedom is security!' What? You disagree? Are you sure you really want to do that? Do you have something to hide? Hmmmn? Adamant are you? Hmmmn... Your name? No, that isn't necessary sir. We do not need your name. You know we know who you are.
But fellow Americans ...as this article calmly implies... we won't really know who THEY are ... those that will be watching us. Seems there will be many watchers on many levels of privileged access. Our kids will only know they are being watched and always have been watched and always will be... all their lives.
Given time, those who live in glass houses... will worry that pulling the drapes ... will look suspicious.
Freedom is only a state of mind ... but then so is fear.
No jack booted storm troopers though... not this time.
They'll have no need.
There is already RFID in Levi jeans, Gillette razors, your passport, and even your money can be tracked from space in large enough amounts. Watch out for laws to require a national ID card to be required to travel, enter certain buildings, etc. Refuse RFID technology, even in your passport and license, it is barely disguised fascism. I weep for our constitution and the founding fathers roll face down in shame. Free yourself from global consumerism and corporate colonialism. Don't be a slave to ANY technology.
"Your papers please?" Nonsense, we know who you are, and where you are, and what you are doing. When your chip turns black, report to the center for euthanasia.
Already well explored in Logan's Run and a few others. With current microchip (nanochip?) technology, there is nothing preventing the government from piggybacking onto any of these devices. You could be chipped during a routine flu or other disease inoculation and never know it.
"If you are innocent, you have nothing to fear." Right! Who defines innocent? One man's innocence is another government's guilt.
People are chipping their pets, their possessions (like cars), everything. All these advances in communication technologies have only made us more paranoid and isolated from one another. Refuse all RF devices -- on both health and civil liberties grounds.