Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Feed The World? We Are Fighting a Losing Battle, UN Admits
The United Nations warned yesterday that it no longer has enough money to keep global malnutrition at bay this year in the face of a dramatic upward surge in world commodity prices, which have created a "new face of hunger".
"We will have a problem in coming months," said Josette Sheeran, the head of the UN's World Food Programme (WFP). "We will have a significant gap if commodity prices remain this high, and we will need an extra half billion dollars just to meet existing assessed needs."
With voluntary contributions from the world's wealthy nations, the WFP feeds 73 million people in 78 countries, less than a 10th of the total number of the world's undernourished. Its agreed budget for 2008 was $2.9bn (£1.5bn). But with annual food price increases around the world of up to 40% and dramatic hikes in fuel costs, that budget is no longer enough even to maintain current food deliveries.
The shortfall is all the more worrying as it comes at a time when populations, many in urban areas, who had thought themselves secure in their food supply are now unable to afford basic foodstuffs. Afghanistan has recently added an extra 2.5 million people to the number it says are at risk of malnutrition
"This is the new face of hunger," Sheeran said. "There is food on shelves but people are priced out of the market. There is vulnerability in urban areas we have not seen before. There are food riots in countries where we have not seen them before."
WFP officials say the extraordinary increases in the global price of basic foods were caused by a "perfect storm" of factors: a rise in demand for animal feed from increasingly prosperous populations in India and China, the use of more land and agricultural produce for biofuels, and climate change.
The impact has been felt around the world. Food riots have broken out in Morocco, Yemen, Mexico, Guinea, Mauritania, Senegal and Uzbekistan. Pakistan has reintroduced rationing for the first time in two decades. Russia has frozen the price of milk, bread, eggs and cooking oil for six months. Thailand is also planning a freeze on food staples. After protests around Indonesia, Jakarta has increased public food subsidies. India has banned the export of rice except the high-quality basmati variety.
"For us, the main concern is for the poorest countries and the net food buyers," said Frederic Mousseau, a humanitarian policy adviser at Oxfam. "For the poorest populations, 50%-80% of income goes on food purchases. We are concerned now about an immediate increase in malnutrition in these countries, and the landless, the farmworkers there, all those who are living on the edge."
Much of the blame has been put on the transfer of land and grains to the production of biofuel. But its impact has been outweighed by the sharp growth in demand from a new middle class in China and India for meat and other foods, which were previously viewed as luxuries.
"The fundamental cause is high income growth," said Joachim von Braun, the head of the International Food Policy Research Institute. "I estimate this is half the story. The biofuels is another 30%. Then there are weather-induced erratic changes which caused irritation in world food markets. These things have eaten into world levels of grain storage.
"The lower the reserves, the more nervous the markets become, and the increased volatility is particularly detrimental to the poor who have small assets."
The impact of climate change will amplify that already dangerous volatility. Record flooding in west Africa, a prolonged drought in Australia and unusually severe snowstorms in China have all had an impact on food production.
"The climate change factor is so far small but it is bound to get bigger," Von Braun said. "That is the long-term worry and the markets are trying to internalise it."
The WFP is holding an emergency meeting in Rome on Friday, at which its senior managers will meet board members to brief them on the scale of the problem. There will then be a case-by-case assessment of the seriousness of the situation in the affected countries, before the WFP formally asks for an increased budget at its executive board meeting in June.
But the donor countries are also facing higher fuel and transport costs. For the biggest US food aid programme, non-food costs now account for 65% of total programme expenditure.
Global impact: Where inflation bites deepest1 United States The last time America's grain silos were so empty was in the early seventies, when the Soviet Union bought much of the harvest. Washington is telling the World Food Programme it is facing a 40% increase in food commodity prices compared with last year, and higher fuel bills to transport it, so the US, the biggest single food aid contributor, will radically cut the amount it gives away.
2 Morocco 34 people jailed this month for taking part in riots over food prices.
3 Egypt The world's largest importer of wheat has been hard hit by the global price rises, and most of the increase will be absorbed in increased subsidies. The government has also had to relax the rules on who is eligible for food aid, adding an extra 10.5 million people.
4 Eritrea It could be one of the states hardest hit in Africa because of its reliance on imports. The price rises will hit urban populations not previously thought vulnerable to a lack of food.
5 Zimbabwe With annual inflation of 100,000% and unemployment at 80%, price increases on staples can only worsen the severe food shortages.
6 Yemen Prices of bread and other staples have nearly doubled in the past four months, sparking riots in which at least a dozen people were killed.
7 Russia The government struck a deal with producers last year to freeze the price of milk, eggs, vegetable oil, bread and kefir (a fermented milk drink). The freeze was due to last until the end of January but was extended for another three months.
8 Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai has asked the WFP to feed an extra 2.5 million people, who are now in danger of malnutrition as a result of a harsh winter and the effect of high world prices in a country that is heavily dependent on imports.
9 Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf announced this month that Pakistan would be going back to ration cards for the first time since the 1980s, after the sharp increase in the price of staples. These will help the poor (nearly half the population) buy subsidised flour, wheat, sugar, pulses and cooking fat from state-owned outlets.
10 India The government will spend 250bn rupees on food security. India is the world's second biggest wheat producer but bought 5.5m tonnes in 2006, and 1.8m tonnes last year, driving up world prices. It has banned the export of all forms of rice other than luxury basmati.
11 China Unusually severe blizzards have dramatically cut agricultural production and sent prices for food staples soaring. The overall food inflation rate is 18.2%. The cost of pork has increased by more than half. The cost of food was rising fast even before the bad weather moved in, as an increasingly prosperous population began to demand as staples agricultural products previously seen as luxuries. The government has increased taxes and imposed quotas on food exports, while removing duties on food imports.
12 Thailand The government is planning to freeze prices of rice, cooking oil and noodles.
13 Malaysia and the Philippines Malaysia is planning strategic stockpiles of the country's staples. Meanwhile the Philippines has made an unusual plea to Vietnam to guarantee its rice supplies. Imports were previously left to the global market.
14 Indonesia Food price rises have triggered protests and the government has had to increase its food subsidies by over a third to contain public anger.
FAQ: Food pricesFew winners and many losers
What is the problem?
In the three decades to 2005, world food prices fell by about three-quarters in inflation-adjusted terms, according to the Economist food prices index. Since then they have risen by 75%, with much of that coming in the past year. Wheat prices have doubled, while maize, soya and oilseeds are at record highs.
Why are food prices rising?
The booming world economy has driven up prices for all commodities. Changes in diets have also played a big part. Meat consumption in many countries has soared, pushing up demand for the grain needed by cattle. Demand for biofuels has also risen strongly. This year, for example, one third of the US maize crop will go to make biofuels. Moreover, the gradual reform and liberalisation of agricultural subsidy programmes in the US and Europe have reduced the butter and grain mountains of yesteryear by eliminating overproduction.
Who are the winners and losers?
Farmers are the obvious winners, as are poor countries that rely extensively on food exports. But consumers are having to pay more, and the urban poor in many developing states will be hardest hit, as they often spend more than a third of their income on food.
How long are prices likely to be high?
The US department for agriculture says the country's wheat stocks are at their lowest for 50 years and demand will continue to exceed supply this year. There is potential to bring more land into production in countries such as Ukraine, but that could take time. And as all foodstuffs have risen sharply in price there is little incentive for farmers to switch from one crop to another.
What about the EU's common agricultural policy?
High food prices certainly remove the need to subsidise farmers and so there is a chance, say experts, that badly needed reductions in CAP subsidies, which cost European taxpayers dearly, could now be within reach.
Are other commodity prices also rising?
Oil, metals and coal have seen their prices rise strongly as the global economy has expanded rapidly, driving up demand for almost everything,
particularly from emerging economies such as China and India. Some economists think speculation may also play a part. Disappointed by the sub-prime collapse and falling property values in many countries, investors have piled money into commodities.
Ashley Seager
© 2008 The Guardian

30 Comments so far
Show AllThe loss of value of the $USD sure affects many others.
Greenspan today advised the Emirates to change to local currncies from the dollar to avoid excessive inflation in their countries.
The rise in prices of grain is tied to the cost of oil in $US.
People need to starve so that oil companies can make record breaking profits. Isn't this capitilism in action!
I bet the USA is aching to dump more DU and Agent Orange on international farmlands.
"Farmers are the obvious winners" Throughout the last few decades traditional farmers have been struggling to hold on to their land while prices for crops have been dismally low. Small farmers have been forced from the land while corporate farming takes over and single operations cultivate thousands upon thousands of acres. "Farmers" are not "winning." Corporate enterprise is winning by stealing the windfall and trashing the family farm.
If you have the power to kill then the rest of the population dies.
Isn't this the mind set of neo-fascists?
I can't deal with this issue. I get so mad I could bite. There is absolutely no exuse for this happening in this world.
This is a classic example of why capitalism is among the worst of economic systems we could possibly be using. Corporate-sponsored "free-trade" policies have eliminated from the vast majority of the world the ability of local and regional farmers to feed their own countries. Now, these same people are starving, rationing, and suffering at the whims of those countries with surpluses in staple foods. Market-esque policies become genocidal and class warfare when applied to basic human needs like food, water, shelter, and medicine, but don't look for Thomas Friedman to talk about any of this...
When I was a kid I went to Montana to work on my uncle's family wheat farm during the summers. I learned about food and farm policy from him, especially when he talked about the entrance of wall street investors into the food and commodities sector and how because of that (combined with farm subsidies pushing up production and suppressing prices) they lost money on the farm every single year. Then just this last harvest season wheat prices rose significantly for the first time since Nixon was in office, but my uncle didn't get to reap any of the windfall... Having lost too much money on the farm, he was forced to sell out and get a job as an engineer (he was lucky to have a degree to fall back on).
The main beef I have with this article is that while it mentions "farmers" as the "winners" in all of this catastrophe, it doesn't bother to mention that tremendous segments of the world grain production, processing, and trading markets are cornered by agribusiness giants like Cargill, Monsanto, etc. Aside from that, I'm grateful for some worthwhile journalism of the kind we never get here in the states. Thanks CD for reposting!
this is BS and the excuses provided by this author is BS.
even when food is supplied what is being subsidized is not the hungry, but the manufacturing supplying the food.
cut out the exploitive institution the middle-man is operating from.
its not a problem of having enough food to feed or the ability to increase or decrease production. its a problem of enriching suppliers at the expense of the welfare of others; subversion of any sense of solidarity, social responsibility or authentic concern for the well-being of others.
The government is not going to help you. If you have a single, 40-hour-per-week job, chances are good you're going to lose it. Either that, or the gas you need to get to your job will take increasingly large chunks of your income, which is not going to increase.
The solution, GROW FOOD! Do it on your suburban lot! Do it on the roof of your apartment building! If you have a nest-egg and are willing to act boldly, move to some acreage and grow enough extra to feed your neighbours! If you don't have enough money to do that, join with others to raise the money, and do it co-operatively. (If you do have enough to buy the land on your own, start looking for partners anyway.)
We are facing the triumvirate of the destruction of civilization: global warming, fossil energy depletion, and financial collapse. It's time for people to change their lives. The sleep-walkers won't survive.
this almost reminds me of the control that the corps put on food supply. they have tried to corner the market for as long as industrial civilization has been around. take the railroads for insteance, they would not only take the wheat or other foods from farmers but would ask for fees to, "take all that worthless grain off your hands" or not pay and let it rot over winter. Its win-win if you own the rails (warren buffet) lose-lose if you do the work to raise the food. TIME TO RISE UP PEOPLE AND DEMAND THE LEGALIZATION OF INDUSTRIAL HEMP. HEMP IS THE ONLY THING THAT CAN REVERSE THE TIDE!! THE SOONER THE BETTER, EVENTUALLY THE GOV WILL HAVE TO RELENT, CAN YOU SAY ---HEMP FOR VICTORY?----- GOOGLE HEMP FOR VICTORY, OUR GOVERNMENT IS SO HYPOCRITICAL!
Could it be that high-yield GM crops may soon have their profitable reign and might be another example of 'Disaster Capitalism'?
The "booming world economy" didn't inflate prices, but rather capitalist speculation and market rigging have the most impact. Remember that fanatical capitalists are in control of the US government so it's been a completely lawless environment over the past seven years with rampant price gouging and collusion going on. The capitalist exploitation cycle works like this: When Demoks are in the White House prices sag to addict the consumer, then when Repuks are in the White House, prices inflate to reap the harvest. There is also crazed speculation capital encouraged by Repuks in control. And then there is the ongoing "creative chaos" of war without end, never ending belligerence out of the White House spooking the markets, which makes it much easier for the commodities merchants to snatch a larger piece of the pie. Capitalist-induced fear/chaos enables capitalist looting. China/India consumption is part of it too, driven by the influence of capitalist media, Madison Av., Hollywood sets with the big mansion, and the beemer for the teenage child to drive to upscale restaurants to have filet mignon in gap clothing, spring break in cancun. Like, I can so afford it with daddy's credit card, he's a lawyer, huh.
Global population is rising by some 100 million each year. (Twice as many people now as in 1965).The Pope and US President Bush are against abortion and spreading info on contraception.
The combination means global human disasters are lining up to happen. And the disasters are happening right now, just outside the view of us internet-rich.
At least 30.000 dying every day from malnutrition as now, that's a disaster unfolding.
Stopping unwanted births - i.e. allowing unwanted births not to happen - would reduce population increase by at least 80 % (cf. http://www.optimumpopulationtrust.org ).
The reason why stopping of population increase doesn't happen is that the richest people in the world have a tacit interest in population increase continuing. That way the pyramid-scheme of population-increase keeps adding new workers eager to work – i.e survive – at subsistence-level. These new "investors" - investing their lives in the global capitalist pyramid - ensure conditions continue to change, hope of better lives for the participants are kept alive by the changes - and a dominant part of global population keeps believing we're best served by accepting the main conditions as they are – a world-trade system which de facto means global population keeps increasing.
As soon as a stable-state population is reached, all other inequalities, injustices and exploitations will start showing much clearer. The unfairnesses will become unsustainable. The global inequality will stand exposed and is unlikely to remain accepted.
But population increase ensures the real conditions are concealed by the changes caused by the constant increase in people, and this enables the stark exploitation of the starving poorest billion to continue.
Why don't we stop it? We're certainly rich enough and smart enough. Let's get to it. - Talkin' 'bout a revolution, in attitudes, and ONE STANDARD FOR ALL.
Let Benevolent Reciprocity Rule. It will do if only the active stopping of it ceases. The militarism kept up by the richest part of the global population is the only force holding Reciprocity at bay. Because individually people are naturally helpful. We can easily help global population stabilize.
I'm glad I'm not the only sane person on the planet. Sometimes it seems that way. Everyone in the world could be well fed with a shift in values and a little creativity.
The problem is land that should be used for growing food- and was growing food at the beginning of 2007- has been give over to growing fuel for cars. Then more land that was rainforest is cut down to grow more agrofuels. These crops are so profitable, and available food supplies so low, that prices soar. That is what's causing all those food riots. Corn that would have been sold to Mexico for human food now goes in the gas tank, so the Mexicans can't make tortillas. So they riot. Agribusiness makes lots of money.
At the same time of course we must admit that even though the world has had food surpluses the last 30 years, children in the Global South continued to die of hunger. So if the wfp can fix the food shortage it must then find a way to get it to those hungry kids. It can't be that hard.
try this
http://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk/
When are we going to start adding birth control to the equation for healthy survival of the species?
Please do not underestimate the advice Jan gave you to grow your own food. Supplement that by purchasing organic foods from your local farmers market and can much of it. Plant fruit bearing trees on your property. Store water and find a dependable secondary water source. Stockpile a three to six months supply of your meds. Finally, remember New Orleans.
People starving all over the planet. Whats new here?
Using food crops as biofuels is a waste. The idea of the UN and other donor countries using a currency other than the dollar is a great idea. Our coins aren't worth the metal they are made from. Is the dollar bill going to be worth less than the paper its printed on?
Population is the problem. Every time there is an advance in food production, public sanitation, water supplies, medicine... what happens? All those children survive and the population booms. Religions enccourage big families because it was once necessary for survival of the race and clan.
The US adminstration does attach strings that discourage birth control to foreign aid. They should be helping third world countries control population, not encourage wall to wall starving people aound the planet.
The human race has the ability to let the earth be the garden it was meant to be, but we are ripping it up either in the holy name of Capitalism and Competition or because there are just too many people for the resources to sustain.
We are trying to do something about the large agri-business in Woodbury County, Iowa = please check out www.woodburyorganics.com.
I am with the guy above. WHEN are we going to talk about the REAL problem-TOO MANY PEOPLE!
A finite planet cannot support infinite growth in people or wealth.
I beleive the UN must call for ALL, and yes, I mean us comfortable white folks too, to stop having babies!
THAT is the real solution, and the only one that will even dent the problem.
Neither our governments, nor any amount of wealth can fix this problem.
AND, if you think, well, there's still lots of unused land to grow crops, think again. Crops need water and we are running out of that too. WHY? Because we use too much electricity (for one). In different states in the US it takes between 10 and 154 gallons per kilowatt hour to produce electricity. So turn off a light!
That's just one example. But my point is, it's all connected. And if there's a die-off of people in third world countries, the price of metal, chocolate, coffee, tea and cheap plastic junk will go way up!
I too think that there is nothing like growing food, LOTS of food, where ever you are, AND knowing where your water comes from (and I don't mean the city.)
And as for infinite solutions for businesses, farms, homes, cars, etc. To quote my bumpersticker, "One solution comes up every morning!"
And as for infinite solutions for businesses, farms, homes, cars, etc. To quote my bumpersticker, "One solution comes up every morning!"
dozens of responses and people missed the highlights:
rise in demand for animal feed from increasingly prosperous populations in India and China,
Changes in diets have also played a big part. Meat consumption in many countries has soared, pushing up demand for the grain needed by cattle.
**there you have it. The sins of the meat based diet once again.
When you start having wars caused by scarcity of resources due to meat eating, then you will see a return to the biblical times when people fought over grazing land.
If you care about yourself, others people and the planet, you have to go veg.
The fact that our government has subsidized the bio-fuel industry which is a faux solution at best isn't helping. The cost of food used in the production of bio-fuels will drastically make produce like corn increasingly more expensive.
... And for what exactly? The amount of energy required (mostly coal) to produce the bio-fuel is far more toxic and in greater amounts to that of oil purification. While the actual Co2 emissions are only nominally better compared to oil in the end product.
So basically we are just passing on a faux solution to make everyone feel better and to give the illusion that we are making a difference.
-James
www.thepoliticus.org
The world is going to continue to starve as long as we refused to address the real roots of the problem! OVERPOPULATION! I only heard a couple here scratch the surface of the growing problem. WE ARE POPULATING OURSELVES INTO OBLIVION!!! There is no other way of saying it. Every year more millions are added to the starving on this planet. And what does our illustrious President do???? He cuts off all aid for family planning because his Evangelical, Catholic and Mormon cronies don't believe in birth control or abortion of any kind. As long as the intelligent is being guided by religious susperstition and ignorance the human race is going to suffer. Maybe when every square inch of this planet has a human being dwelling on it these people might make the effort to wake up! When there are people starving in the streets and this planet is being ravaged by wars that is a result of their ignorance. But, then again I doubt it. They aren't guided by reality they are guided by religious dogma that some church father invented to control the masses. That isn't based on human needs but rather religion's needs.
Scariest post on the board.
The BBC opened its American broadcast yesterday with this story. When the host asked the expert he was interviewing what has caused the increase in world hunger, the first cause mentioned by the expert was the rise in oil prices. Therefore, since Mr. Bush's illegal wars are the leading cause in the rise in oil prices, Mr. Bush is the main cause of the rise in world hunger (in addition to the main cause of the deaths and maiming of more than a million Iraqis.)
Local Food Resources:
www.localharvest.org - Directory of Farmer's Markets, CSAs, family farms, etc.
www.eatwild.com - Locally or regionally pasture-raised meats (for the non-vegetarians who don't want to support grain-based CAFOs)
Truth Addict, well said.
8 billion arable acres worldwide.
World average diet requires 1.2 acres per person.
That's 6.7 billion people's food production potential of arable land. In other words, on our present diets, we are just now crossing the line of sustainability.
6 acres per person for the meat heavy american diet.
.6 acres per person for vegetarian diet.
.3 acres per person for VEGAN diet.
If you want to help the people over there, not starve to death, eat vegetables. Stop chewing cow carcasses.
1 more thing, at the present rate of soil erosion due hoof packing of then rain washing off previously growable soil, there are less than 40 years before this place is ungrowable, dessertified. Just like the movie Dune.
Say tumbleweed, as stupid as Bush seems, he's really just very subtly cunning. He knows what he's doing and what he's trying to get by doing it. He's as big a screw over as was the King of Jerusalem about 2000 years ago.
He doesn't really think he's doing the work of the god of this universe, he's doing the work of the dominant of this planet, same type of people who back in the day, figured out how to communicate by written symbols, figured out how to smith metal weapons, figured out biological warfare and the list goes on... One of the Caesars was claiming godhood in Jesus Day. Pharoahs were claiming god hood before them. Chin was the first in public record to strive for immortality. Chin of course the first chinese emperor. The pope is the supposed conveyor of gods word right now. God's in hiding these days I guess... There's probably some nation who knows who he is, but they're SS, super secret... just like the secret service, in service to the secret. Anyhow, the planet is not overpopulated, it's just inefficient. By strict vegan food production, the most efficient agricultural system, this planets land alone is worth 24 billion people's worth of food growth potential. OVER POPULATION as the former supporter of Eugenics, David Rockefeller, head of the POPULATION COUNCIL appointed by Nixon, criminal president, over population does not exist yet, gross inefficiencies exist. Over population is a notion cooked up by psychological warriors to convince people to murder for the sake of necessity. It is bogus. What slows though population growth which is a good idea in the near term til some manner of stability can be implemented, is malaria prevention and general medical care suffice to deliver children beyond the age of 5. The US is a population in decline, apart from immigration. The US population would be falling were not for immigration. The situation is similar in most industrial nations where children are well expected to live beyond the age of 5. Handing out condoms, does not make much of a difference. Condoms break, people get lax with the condom use, people enter marriage and skip the condom all together and bare 17 children... Family planning is not some silver bullet for population growth. Helpful? yes, but only by so small a degree as to be rendered moot.
rocyahsoul February 27th, 2008 4:18 pm,
its not necessary for all to be vegans.
one could go to their local grocery store to inquire how much meat and other foods are disposed of in a week.
the problem here is placing lifes necessities on a market as a commodity. prevailing economic institutions (ie private companies) would rather let food spoil and be thrown away than distributed more equitably and efficiently so as to resolve hunger. what matters is the profit made from what is sold. there is not much thought placed on how much is wasted.