EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
What Happened to Mental Health Care for Vets?
The debate over the subject of suicide, and the treatment of soldiers and veterans, continues in Washington. Meanwhile, veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are killing themselves at an alarming rate.
Andreas-Georg ("Andrew") Pogany was trained at the U.S. Army Intelligence Center in Fort Huachuca, Arizona, to interrogate high-level terrorism suspects in Iraq. But one evening in September 2003 in Samarra, he fell apart. That night, he saw the corpse of an Iraqi man cut in half by a Bradley cannon during a battle. Afterward, Pogany began shaking, barely able to catch his breath. He sat for hours in a dark room in a military compound with his hand on a weapon. If someone opened the door, he was prepared to shoot.
The following day, he told a team sergeant he did not feel strong enough to work. "He took me outside, and he told me I was a fucking coward, and if it was up to him he would shoot me in the head," says Pogany, 36, on a December evening at a restaurant called Racine's in downtown Denver, four years after the incident. Pogany has broad shoulders and grey hair at the temples, and he wears heavy silver rings on both hands. He does not look like someone who is easily thrown off balance. When he talks about his conversation with the military officer, though, he stares into the distance. "He was like General Patton. Short of slapping me with his glove, he did it all," he says.
Pogany was soon facing charges of cowardice, a crime punishable by death in a military court. He told his less-than-supportive military attorney: "Go pound sand." Then he hired a Colorado Springs-based civilian lawyer and showed that he had been suffering from side effects of a military-issued, anti-malarial drug called Lariam while he was in Iraq.
On Nov. 6, 2003, less than six weeks after he experienced his "drug-induced, psychiatric breakdown," as he says, a CNN segment titled "Heroes and Cowards in War" appeared on television. Army Private Jessica Lynch was held up as a hero; Pogany was described as a coward. Yet things have changed over time. In April 2007, Lynch testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that the Army exaggerated her role in fighting off Iraqi insurgents, turning her into "little girl Rambo" in order to pump up enthusiasm for the war. Meanwhile, Pogany, though he's far from the battlefield in Iraq, has emerged as a hero. At Army posts and in military communities across the country, he is trying to help save people who have returned from the war with mental and emotional problems.
On July 15, 2004, the Army dropped the cowardice charges. At that point, Pogany became Exhibit A in the case against the military's treatment of mental illness among soldiers. He was featured in GQ ("The Coward," July 2004) and on PBS' Frontline ("The Soldier's Heart," March 2005), as well as in dozens of newspaper articles. "He was like a canary in a coal mine," explains Paul Rieckhoff, executive director of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America. "Now, years later, we see more cases of the stress of war -- acute stress -- and the Army's inability to deal with it."
Over the past several years, Pogany has visited military installations, set up meetings between congressional leaders and soldiers, and examined ways the Army can improve its mental-health care. On Jan. 1, 2008, he was hired as an investigator for the National Veterans Legal Services Program, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit organization. Experts in the field of veterans' care say he is one of the most effective advocates in the country. "Congress tends to hear about the military from higher-ups, and there's an institutional response. They're making things look the best they can," says Charles Sheehan-Miles, former executive director of Veterans for Common Sense. Pogany has worked hard to ensure that people in Washington meet directly with individuals who have been through the military's mental-heath-care system -- "the folks on the ground," as Sheehan-Miles explains.
Pogany knows a great deal about the subject of mental-health care for veterans and soldiers, both through his research and from his own experience in the military. "I see this guy, and he's always pushing the meds," Pogany recalls, describing the mental-health treatment he had received. "'So I say, 'Let's just say I'm going to take this drug. What are the side effects?' He had to look them up. One of them, it turns out, is an inability to get an erection. I'm like, 'You think I'm depressed now?' He said, 'If that happens, we'll just give you a prescription for Viagra.' We both laugh. "Later, I find out people I know are on nine or ten meds. I felt like I was dealing with a M-A-S-H episode. There is this comedy of errors, and it culminates with this guy going home and blowing his brains out. And they say, 'Oh, well, he was depressed.'"
Suicide among veterans and soldiers has been occurring with a disturbing frequency in recent years. Approximately 1,000 individuals receiving care through the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) kill themselves each year, according to VHA records. In August, the Army Surgeon General's Office reported that 99 active-duty soldiers killed themselves in 2006, the highest number since 1991, the year of the Gulf War.
In August 2007, a psychiatry consultant to the Army Surgeon General, Col. Elspeth Cameron Ritchie reported that the suicides had been caused by financial woes, troubled relationships, and other issues - and had not been caused by the war. But some experts disagree with that assessment, saying that the military has determined there is no direct relationship between the rate of suicides and deployments in order to avoid additional, wartime costs that might be required to treat or prevent suicides. "There are various possible explanations for the Pentagon's refusal to accept that connection," said Penny Coleman, author of Flashback: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Suicide, and the Lessons of War, before the House Committee on Veterans Affairs in December 2007. "But one of the most compelling is budgetary." In other words, treating soldiers and veterans with mental-health problems is expensive -- and refusing to draw a connection between war and suicide may simply be a way of saving money.
Col. Ritchie says that is not an accurate assessment of their position. In fact, she says in an email on February 21, "We do believe that the frequent deployments were straining marriages and other relationships." In addition, she says, "Failed intimate relationships are a definite risk factor for suicide. Other risk factors for our soldiers include legal and occupational difficulties, and the availability of firearms in theater. As time has gone on, we continue to see the effects of deployment on relationships. We also need to acknowledge the connection between PTSD, substance abuse, and suicide. To date, few of our suicides have had diagnosed PTSD."
The debate over the subject of suicide, and the treatment of soldiers and veterans, continues in Washington. Meanwhile, Pogany is traveling around the country to investigate mental-health care at Army posts so he can help soldiers who may need legal assistance or aid in obtaining proper health care. Several weeks ago, he arrived in Syracuse, New York, in the midst of a blizzard. The mental-health facilities at nearby Fort Drum have been taxed with visits up 200 percent above prewar levels, and an additional clinic, Mountain Community Tricare Behavioral Health, was added to Fort Drum in June to meet the demand. (Tricare is a managed-care company.) Assistant Secretary of Defense S. Ward Casscells told the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel in July 2007 that the clinic is "a model for other installations."
Yet a soldier at Fort Drum still must wait six to eight weeks before he can see a mental-health worker, says Pogany. "The [mental-health-care] providers say, 'Hey, we're doing this, we're doing that,'" he says. "And on paper, they're seeing people. On paper, they have a PTSD group. On paper, they have someone coming in for an appointment. But when you pull that apart, it's all coffeehouse crap."
It is after 5 p.m. at Racine's restaurant, and Pogany is checking his watch. He has recently come back from another trip -- this time to Anchorage, Alaska, where 3,700 troops recently returned to Fort Richardson from Iraq. They have arrived home, he says, during the dark winter months in a place known for clinical depression, suicide, and crystal meth. "How many psychiatrists they have there? Zero," Pogany says. (Maj. Vanessa Venezia, the chief of the community mental-health division at Bassett Army Community Hospital, Fort Wainwright, who oversees Fort Richardson's mental-health services, says they are currently hiring a psychiatrist. In the meantime, she explains, soldiers are being treated in a full-service clinic at nearby Elmendorf Air Force Base.)
Pogany says the need for expanded mental-health services for soldiers at Fort Richardson is urgent. "If they don't address this problem now, the roof will cave in," he says. "All we have to do is sit back and wait ninety to one hundred days and see how many suicides and DUIs there are, and then separate out how many are combat-related."
Tara McKelvey, a senior editor at the Prospect, is a research fellow at NYU School of Law's Center on Law and Security and the author of Monstering: Inside America's Policy on Secret Interrogations and Torture in the Terror War.
© 2008 by The American Prospect, Inc.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

24 Comments so far
Show AllThe government rightly realizes that mental health is a threat to national security.
More guys come home with mental problems from the wars that shouldn't have happened. War is bad enough to experience and will cause some to suffer from mental problems afterwards. But when the war is not justified, and none since WW2 have been, the more soldiers have mental problems as a result. To prevent vets from having mental problems our country has to stop sending them to wars that are not justified. Of course that will never happen so we can just get used to mentally ill veterans running around our country.
Hoa binh
Mental health care for vets went to the same place: Building 18 of Walter Reed. Not that this anything new in American history, as the USA has a shameful record of treating its' veterans shabbily, dating back from the Revolutionary War. The one generation of veterans that got the benefits they deserved (WW2) were lucky enough to have the veterans lobby (remembering the horrible treatment of its' members during the Bonus March of 1932) actually do its' job and politically agitate for the passage of the G.I. Bill of Rights (despite Republican objections...funny how some things never change) in 1944. Since then, it has been a slow slide back to the shameful situation we have now while the majority of the current "leaders" of the veterans lobby have learned this painful truth, "Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it."
If they don't address this problem now, the roof will cave in,"
Does the author of this report expect any sympathy from people everywhere around the world who warned that the invasion would bring these results? Read Russia/Afghan occupation .
The sooner these nut-bars cripple the awesome power of American military , the better.
The sooner the majority of Americans switch from the touchy-feelly " Support Our Troops " mantra to one of " Desert "
will Americdan hubris be purged.
VETERANS CARE
The deprivation of care for many of our wounded and deserving veterans, who will bear lifelong scars from this ill conceived war, is not only a violation of trust--but is contemptuous. As the worlds richest nation, we have always had the means to prevent and alleviate such dreadful injustices. The unprecedented profiteering that has accompanied their sacrifices only adds to the outrage.
Responsible parties should be charged with criminal neglect–this includes those the top.
Why would you ever trust people who would waste your blood to steal other people's resources?
Stories like this are the tip of an iceberg. The main moral I see is not that this war is particularly bad, although it has been. What people must appreciate is that the toll of any war is huge and lasts long after the war is over. Vets who do commit suicide leave many wrecked lives behind them as a consequence. Vets who suffer PTSD without suicide still bring to society more dysfunction, more rage, more helpless cynicism. You simply cannot damage people without the damage being passed on -- and on, and on. War damages so many people, we simply must find a way to live without it.
The VA was originally chartered with two missions... training Medical Professionals AND providing health care for Veterans.
The first Bush Administration created a cabinet post and the Department of Veterans Affairs, now directed by political appointees, was born.
VA hospitals have been closed everywhere, centalizing facilities only in association with medical schools, now called Regional Medical Centers. They justify this decreased access citing cost management, and setting up satellite clinics with limited capacity for the convenience of Veterans not situated in an urban region.
The VA gets a billion dollars a year from MegaPharms for Research. This is apportioned to VA Doctors throughout the system with Physicians getting multi-million dollar research grants, largely about drug efficacy and disease origins. The VA literally launders the money between the megapharms and the doctors to maintain the appearance of objectivity of this research. If the University Dcotors took the money directly it would be conflict of interest. If the VA takes, then reapportions the money, the Doctors get rich while giving the Megapharms the research they want. It's critical to understand this symbiosis, to understand why Veterans suffer. It's Institutional Scale, FELONY Conflict of Interest. These doctors are federal employees, as well as usually being on the staff of teaching Universities.
Megapharms, the Medical Industry and Defense Contractors were some of the Bush Campaign's biggest contributors. More often than not, research performed through the VA "proves" that manufacturers of Agent Orange and Depleted Uranium are innocent of harming our Veterans. They "prove" that although 75% of Hep C cases in this country are Veterans, they ALL acquired the disease snorting cocaine from the same straw, in the same Discoteque, in 1978. They couldn't possibly have gotten it from contaminated serums received in Basic Combat Training. If they had, then the manufacturers of those serums, that now manufacture the drugs to treat Hep C, might be subject to Civil Liability... as would the manufacturers of Agent Orange or Depleted Uranium Munitions.
Veterans that have disabilities connected to military service do not get benefits automatically. They have to prove the relationship between active service and and the disability in question. This creates an adversarial relationship between the care provider and the patient... and puts the VA Staff under pressure to NOT IDENTIFY OR DIAGNOSE, yet alone TREAT, these service acquired maladies.
If Mental Health problems are diagnosed, then the VA is legally and ethically obliged to treat those problems. If that process begins, then benefits to compensate for disabilities might happen. But the Veterans Administration saves more than money... they keep their lucrative relationship with the megapharms.
Once diagnosed, the VA is a great place to get designer, experimental psychotropics. But just try getting vulnerable with a therapist, spilling your guts to someone that is taking notes, looking for ways to justify denying you benefits.
Get it?
And who is advocating to Eric Prince about the Blackwater mercenaries who are also suffering?
They've seen (and done) awful things, too. They are just as wounded as military vets. And they will do just as much damage to themselves and others when they return to the U.S. (or wherever their home country is - I understand that Blackwater recruits heavily from central and south america).
These guys at Ft, Drum in Watertown , Ny are way F$$KED!! If not for the care of sister and brother vets, lots of shit goin' on now, mon.
Since 9/11, the 2nd Brigade Combat Team has been deployed for more than 40 months, more than any other brigade in the Army, and I just have to laugh when people say, "But there's no draft."
Because when they joined the Guard I am abso-friggin-lutely sure they knew 9/11 was coming and they would be thrown into some desert in the ME for 3 1/2 years. Vietnam tours were 12 months unless you volunteered or reupped to go back. No Psychiatrists, no Psychologists, WTF you think is going to happen, the other Vets take them with us.
My Rep. Patrick Murphy, always, "I was in Desert Storm, blah blah, if u need yadda...", uh-huh. Friend of mine VVAW, VFP, DVVA, VFP, VVA, great man, a great feminist, I asked him, look I do this all day, I know there must be a bill you need attention paid to, so he emails me the bill #'s, they're the same thing , one is from the House the other the Senate, H R 3167; Fair Mental Health Evaluation for Returning Vets Act, 25 cosponsors and not one is our JO Rep., Mr. 'I was in Desert storm', sits on House Armed Services, Subcommittee on Military Personnel. 4 months I call, I call, I meet, I email, it makes me sick. WTF, we lie get them over there, never bring them home but for a week or so and right back, between PTSD and TBI, no professional help, I hear the youngbloods, that never had to serve, why would you blah blah, your blood, yeah. At 17 and 18 we all know we are right, so STFU, these are wounded beyond repair human beings, led into an illegal invasion by a Treasonous CiC. Do you think they do not see this in their minds eye every second of every minute of every hour of every day of every week of every month of every year? Try a bit of empathy.
If you call Committees ask them not to let H R 3167, S. 1817 sit there and die, if they do humans will be the dead ones.
Not taking care of our own vets in unconscionable. This administration has to go - the quicker, the better!
It is all about the $bottom line. State sanctioned killing is usually an extension of economic schemes.
The grunts have always been cannon fodder.
Taking care of them after they have been used up or injured has never been a high priority for the Pentagon or VA.
In a society where money is the living $God everything else takes a back seat.
One of the more recent scams is to classify vets with traumatic brain injury as PTSD cases to reduce the potential disability benefits. Twelve months or so of PTSD therapy and a permanently damaged person is declared cured.
SOS !
Still wonder why there is any concern about these military psychopaths. They volunteered, they believe Bush, let them take the consequences. If Bush wants to give them something, they should take it; if he does not, it is time they shut-up about how bad off they are. They are not dead like the Iraq civilians they directly or indirectly killed. Whining is revolting.
Veterans have traditionally been an important part of the anti-war movement... contrary to popular belief... they were leaders... not spat on, but listened to with respect and compassion.
I guess you're the exception that proves the rule, joseph morton....
a spitter.
Aside from the devastation to be wreaked on innocent victims - conquered peoples - this was my worst fear and the cause of much personal sorrow. I knew the vets would get shafted since this has been SOP throughout US military history. We haven't dealt with the Vietnam vets yet - to add millions more of seriously emotionally damaged soldiers to our already sick population was physically and emotionally shattering to me.
It was both heinous and inconceivable that anyone could be so amoral - psychopathic - but that's the way America 'does business' - by savaging the most vulnerable people and blaming them for the unfortunate circumstances caused by corporate America's greed. The oil and other companies that made windfall profits from this egregious outrage should be taxed to pay for the care of the many victims - both our own soldiers and the innocent people in the countries we attacked and destroyed without provocation.
We need to stop all wars of aggression, remove our bases from foreign soil - and stop enlisting children to fight any wars. But Americans just don't care. They were even willing to allow the run-up of the price of oil to $100/bbl just to get 'revenge' against people who never threatened, let alone harmed any of us - and willing to sacrifice the blood of their own children to satisfy their lust for violence. What stupidity! American 'morals' are more than a disgrace - they are an abomination - and we shall reap what we have sown.
The truly 'mentally ill' are the monsters that promote and engage in these wars of conquest, and the military cowards who indoctrinate our soldiers with murderous self-destructive brainwashing that robs them of their humanity. Every government official should be required to pass a psychiatric test that rules out sociopaths from ever holding office. We already know that corporations are psychopathic by nature - and we let these bastards run our country! We are damned - and doomed. And we deserve it. Sociopaths are destroying our military and our country - and we are guilty of allowing this to happen. That's why my father resigned - as did many others when faced with such disgusting perversion.
A military career defending one's nation is honorable - but what's been going on in this country makes criminals and deviants of all who pursue this otherwise worthy cause. Being forced to forego one's humanity in order to serve is abominable - accusing a soldier who attempts to sustain his/her humanity is beyond the pale. We need to draw a line in the sand - stop the brainwashing, stop the lies, and stop the wars. But I no longer have any faith that Americans will ever 'do the right thing' - and our soldiers and veterans are caught up in this untenable dilemma, and we throw them to the sharks. So much for national pride - the US is just like Nazi Germany now, and will eventually face the same fate. The US has become the 'Empire of the Damned' - a pariah rogue nation reviled throughout the world, just like Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany in the 20th century. Our fate is sealed.
We don't want to spend the money for their care. But if we find out they have some mental health issues, recent legislation allows us to take away their guns (so called veterans disarmament act) . Last thing we want is for a bunch of verterans who have mental issues and who know how to use guns, to actually have guns when we declare martial law. Gun control will be an early signal of impending lockdown.
Many of those who served in Iraq did not volunteer for Iraq. They were either in the active military, reserves or national guard before the decision to do Iraq was made. Blaming them for Iraq is pathetic.
This is what happened. It can be read in less than two minutes.
http://www.gulfwarvets.com/du_blowinginthewind.htm
ARMY BRAT raises vital issues here. In a sense the fact that so many demonstrate post traumatic stress is proof that nature works. KILLING is not natural, and it would speak worse of the denigration of human nature in a nation increasingly fed a diet of militarism through a variety of simple-minded authoritarian channels, media included if this was NOT the case.
Frankly, I don't want to see a mental health field that can "normalize" soldiers after war and the direct experience of the killing fields. Killing always involves karma, even if the lowly soldier uses the Geneva Convention protocol of "I was only following orders."
War, itself, is effete and so expensive, that its constant preparation acts as suicide to any sane society. When lots of people become maimed from the ART of maiming others, perhaps it helps to cause the necessary critical mass to say ENOUGH! This long historical pattern is not working, and it is M.A.D to continue. Of course now the Dr Strangeloves who would see fit to blow up the world to prove power, have coupled with religious nut jobs who have pulled the wool over millions of sets of eyes in lending false credence to the modern myth of End Times.
Not a spitter at all. I spent a great number of years in the military myself, and have little regard for those who whine. I could not care less about the vets who are anti-war; had they been so, they would not have gone. If these psychopaths had stayed home, between 650,000 and 1 million Iraq civilianas would not have been dead. It is too late to be anti-war on return. I DO NOT SUPPORT THE KILLING, AND I DO NOT SUPPORT THE KILLERS WHO NOW HAVE PROBLEMS. THEY DESERVE WHAT THEY GET, NOT LIKE THE IRAQ CIVILIANS WHO DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE.
The first 100,000 to die in the Nazi holocaust were Hospital Patients with chronic conditions.
Many of them were Veterans. The Nazis considered the people they were killing to be "useless eaters."
The burning shame and injury to national pride associated with the Treaty of Versailles, certainly diminished any sympathy they felt for the disabled WWI Veterans, first victims of the Holocaust.
First to die in more than one way... Veterans are the the canary in the mine. The American Medical Industry is the modern vehicle of Class Genocide.
It is NEVER wrong to care for the sick and injured, anymore than it's wrong to feed children, unable to feed themselves.
The statement that "they deserve what they get" is at the HEART OF ECONOMIC DARWINISM, and the obscene classism that drives U.S. policies.
Whether it was Bill Clinton's War on the Poor, or Bush's veto of health care for children... U.S. Corporacracy is morally no different than the the Third Reich.
Poor kids that just want to go to college and make a better life for their own kids, are sorely tempted by the promises and lies of Military Recruiters. It's a backdoor Draft.
Moral posturing over the poor is the dubious luxury of the fat and secure.
Little surprise that the capitalists have infiltrated and corrupted the Veterans Administration. US capitalists violate the most fundamental market rule: Thou shall yield to the public interests. Instead, US capitalists have hijacked or are trying to hijack all public institutions. Fortunately much of the world is following a different model - the social democracy which properly cages the capitalist beast. In Latin America, East Asia and Europe, eyes are wide open and the battles against the capitalists are going very well. Public awareness of this battle is highly suppressed in the US corporate media. If you wonder why progressives refuse to join the Demoks' partnership with capitalist evil, the urgency to save our public institutions from the evil ranks high on our list of reasons, as does the corporate media's censoring of public awareness of the predation and destruction.
> US capitalists violate the most fundamental market rule: Thou shall yield to the public interests.
It is not the function of capitalism to figure out public interest. It's the function of democracy.
> THEY DESERVE WHAT THEY GET
"Many that live deserve death. Some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them, Frodo? Do not be too eager to deal out death in judgment. Even the very wise cannot see all ends." - Gandalf
The sentiment that they get what they deserve is the same as Bush supporters who discount the suffering of others. It is not the military's fault that Bush is an idiot or that Americans elected him. Would you prefer a nation where the military feels free to remove politicians they don't like? Do the families and friends of soldiers deserve to suffer? Do the children deserve to watch their Mom or Dad die by degrees? Should funerals be disrupted by protesters so that the dead get 'what they deserve'? There are a lot of problems in the world. Increasing the lack of compassion isn't going to solve them.
unkanny "Would you prefer a nation where the military feels free to remove politicians they don't like?" Hell yeah! I wouldn't mind them removing Bush since Bush reneged on his oath to serve, protect and defend the Constitution of the US.
To Josephmorton: I commend you for your honesty. As a vet I feel the same way. No one held a gun to their head.
josephmorton and forextrader: People join the military for a lot of reasons. What's YOUR excuse? Did someone hold a gun to YOUR heads?