EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Trusting Our Safety to the Current System: A Shot in the Dark
Two massive product recalls - one involving beef, the other a life-saving drug - demonstrate that the regulatory framework Americans depend on for protection from unsafe food and dangerous drugs is badly broken.
On Sunday, a California meat packer issued the largest beef recall in U.S. history. It covered 143 million pounds of meat, including 37 million pounds that had been used for school lunches.
The recall occurred after the Humane Society of the United States, a private organization, uncovered dangerous practices at the Westland/Hallmark Meat Company slaughterhouse. The United States Department of Agriculture, which is supposed to prevent diseased animals from getting into the food supply, had an inspector at the plant but he never detected the practices. Workers at the plant were using forklifts and cattle prods to force so-called downer cows, which cannot walk and are at increased risk of disease, onto the killing floor.
Last week, meanwhile, federal officials acknowledged that they failed to inspect a Chinese plant that produced the active ingredient for a crucial blood-thinning drug called heparin. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is supposed inspect foreign plants before permitting them to ship drugs or chemicals into the country. But FDA officials said this week that they mistook the plant for another with a similar name that already had been inspected. Chinese regulators also failed to inspect the plant. The first reported victims were eight Missouri children experiencing kidney failure. Last November, while getting dialysis at a pediatric hospital, they had life-threatening allergic reactions.
Within weeks, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had reports of more than 350 similar cases from 12 states, most of them adults. Four people died. The culprit turned out to be contaminated heparin, a drug used in surgery and dialysis to prevent blood from clotting.
The FDA is so short-staffed and underfunded, the Government Accountability Office reported last month, that it would need 13 years to inspect every foreign drug plant that ships products into this country. Its record in China is even worse.
That country has more than 700 plants approved to ship drugs to the U.S. Between 2002 and 2007, the FDA inspected just 88 of them. At that rate, it would need 40 years to inspect every Chinese plant now shipping drugs into this country.
The drug safety agency conducts no unannounced plant visits overseas. Even when it does visit, inspectors have no independent translators. Obviously, the agency's lack of language skills played a role in this tragedy. But so did the FDA's faulty databases; the agency has conflicting information about the number of foreign plants shipping into the United States in two databases it maintains.
Because much of the inspection budget comes from user fees paid by drug companies, the FDA does far more inspections in countries with well-developed regulatory systems such as Switzerland and Germany than it does in China. The head of the Chinese drug safety office was executed last year after the country was rocked by scandals tied to counterfeit, unsafe or worthless drugs marketed there.
Waves of similar problems in this country a century ago prompted the formation of an oversight system that was, for many years, the envy of the world. But in recent decades, Congress and successive presidential administrations repeatedly have underfunded the FDA, the USDA and the Consumer Product Safety Commission, which has been forced to recall record numbers of unsafe toys over the past year. A new regulatory philosophy that depends on industry self-policing has come into fashion, with tragically predictable results.
Government agencies that are consistently starved of resources are incapable of doing the job we expect them to do : ensuring that the drugs we take are effective and the food we eat is safe. Trusting our safety to the current, weakened system is like trying to hit targets with a shot in the dark.
Copyright © 2008 St. Louis Post-Dispatch L.L.C.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

13 Comments so far
Show Allyou can thank bush appointees.
wish i could get a job without knowing a damn thing about it.
We should be just as ashamed of throwing out a bunch of meat unnecessarily as we are of possibly having a health risk. How do you suppose the less-wealthy world views this colossal waste due to mismanagement?
A Dem President and a Dem Congress together can quickly reorder the mindset at FDA (as well as a host of other things.) Let's get there and recapture the agencies from the industries.
Hey - the "invisible hand" of free market capitalism will protect us.
If lots of people die from contaminated drugs, other people will stop using those drugs.
If lots of people die from eating contaminated beef from one processor - people will stop eating beef from that processor.
See - no need for costly "regulation" - the market regulates itself !!
/end snark/
Aaaaah, Free-market corporate socialism at work.
When ya borrow money from a dangerous shark, you do what you're told until you've paid off in full.
In this case, we are the compulsive gambler and China is the shark, and they have spoken. Stay out of Somalia, and don't you worry about what's going on in our plants and factories. Understand?
Wouldn't want to have to force another US War Plane to land until the Loonitary Decider apologizes now, would we?...
As Paul Krugman said in one of his op-ed columns early in the Bush Administration with respect to regulation and oversight of financial markets: "and if you don't want that job done, you appoint........to the position."
It's not the invisible hand of free market capitalism that we should worry about but the invisible finger being given by the pro-deregulation party and its cronies.
As most of the beef has already been eaten and 'processed' do we send the Brownies to `ol heckofa job Georgie?
Republican elites seem to be trying to kill us.
Deregulation started with Reagan/Bush, was continued by Clinton/Gore, and accelerated under Bush/Cheney. A large part of this is de-funding what remains of the regulatory agencies. Even with competent management, there is NO way FDA can do its mandated jobs without being funded and thus staffed properly.
The best and fastest way to improve real security--food safety, medical care, jobs, housing--for Americans is to gut the "defense" budget, close down the vasy majority of US bases, and eliminate the so-called Dept. of Homeland Security and related areas of hegemony existing within the remaining executive Departments. Gee, by doing that I freed up close to $ ONE TRILLION to provide REAL security for US citizens.
Doom n Gloom:
There is no evidence that the elite are not trying to kill those unlikely to go along with them. The MSM fail to consider whether or not this is done with evil intent; they seem to accept the hypothesis that either "mistakes were made" or that deregulation will, in the long run, allow "the free market" to optimize the situation. Presumably, they automatically assume nobody could so evil as to bring about the death of their own countrymen for personal and class gain; then, they editorialize against the high US murder rate.
It may be advantageous for the corporations to send their production facilities overseas, but it has been a disaster in too many cases for products made in China and elsewhere. Maybe home made is the best, the regulations are there, and there did used to be inspections on a regular basis. Oh wait...the CEO would not get a huge pay increase if he didn't lower cost of production. This is a systemic problem in the free enterprise system, which has so far failed in just too many instances, but that failure has not just been a simple error, there have been fatalities and that is unacceptable.
Funding is not the main problem, the current system is corrupted. Those regulating the industries put in their 20 years, retire, and then get nice high paying jobs in the industry they regulated (but only if they did not cause too much pain with their regulations or enforcing them). In fact, the industries also release some of their heavies to penetrate the regulatory agencies for short periods. The US treasury department has been called Goldman Sachs South, former Monsanto employees get appointed to the FDA with regularity, etc.
Unless this conflict of interest is resolved, we will always have this problem.