Revealed: The First Draft of Dossier That Took Britain to War
Fresh evidence that the Iraq weapons dossier was “sexed up” emerged as the Government finally published the secret first draft of the document.As expected, the earliest version of the document did not include the now notorious claim that Saddam Hussein could launch weapons of mass destruction within 45 minutes of an order to do so.
The first draft made a series of lurid claims about the extent and danger of the Iraqi president’s weapons arsenal. But those were expressed in even stronger terms by September 2002, when the official dossier on which Tony Blair based the case for war was published.
Ministers had fought a three-year battle to stop the confidential initial draft from being released, but last month lost an appeal against a ruling that it should be disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act.
The paper, whose existence first emerged during the Hutton inquiry in 2003, was written by John Williams, the former director of communications at the Foreign Office. He warned that Saddam had come to power by “torture, rape and execution” and concluded that Iraq presented a “uniquely dangerous threat to the world”.
The Williams paper made a series of detailed claims about the Iraqi president’s stockpile of chemical and biological weapons.
But there was no reference to the 45-minute claim, although it warned that Iraq was “developing as a priority longer-range missile systems capable of targeting Nato (Greece and Turkey?)”.
The final dossier, attributed to John Scarlett, who was then the chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee, made the bold assertion: “Iraq’s military forces are able to use chemical and biological weapons, with command, control and logistical arrangements in place. The Iraqi military are able to deploy these weapons within 45 minutes of a decision to do so.”
In addition, language used in Mr Williams’ assessment of the threat from Saddam was toughened up several times by the publication of the final dossier.
Mr Williams also said that Iraq would “find it difficult to produce fissile material [for nuclear weapons] while sanctions remain in place”.
The Hutton inquiry into the death of the weapons expert Dr David Kelly heard claims that evidence against Saddam was “sexed up” by Downing Street by the time it was presented to the public.
Last night, Mr Williams told BBC Radio 4’s PM programme: “The 45-minutes claim was absolutely nothing whatever to do with me. It was news to me.”
According to the Government, the Williams dossier was quickly set aside after it was decided that Sir John should be made responsible for the document.
Last night, the opposition parties said the language used by Mr Williams, the former political editor of the Daily Mirror, showed that ministers initially turned to senior press officers to make eye-catching claims about the evils of Saddam’s regime. They renewed calls for a public inquiry into the build-up to the conflict.
William Hague, the shadow Foreign Secretary, said: “This is yet further evidence that spin doctors, not intelligence analysts, were leading from the first in deciding what the British people were told about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction.”
Ed Davey, the Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman, said: “The Government cannot continue to deny the major role that spin doctors played in creating this dossier.”
David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, said the Government had not released the draft earlier because of concerns that officials could be deterred from offering frank advice if they feared it could be made public.
How language was ’sexed up’
Williams draft: “[Iraq] is developing as a priority longer-range missile weapons capable of threatening Nato (Greece and Turkey?).”
Final version: “Iraq’s military forces are able to use chemical and biological weapons… The Iraqi military are able to deploy these weapons within 45 minutes of a decision to do so.”
Williams draft: “[Iraq] is testing the solid-propellant missile Ababil-100, and is making efforts to extend its range.”
Final version: “[Iraq has] started producing the solid-propellant Ababil-100, and is making efforts to extend its range to at least 200km, which is beyond the limit of 150km imposed by the UN.”
Williams draft: “[Iraq] has retained a dozen al-Hussein missiles, capable of carrying a chemical or biological warhead…”
Final version: “[Iraq has] illegally retained up to 20 al-Hussein missiles, with a range of 650km, capable of carrying chemical or biological warheads.”
Williams draft: “[Iraq] is close to deploying its al-Samoud liquid propellant missile…”
Final version: “[Iraq has] started deploying its al-Samoud liquid propellant missile.”
© 2008 The Independent








REVEALED: the lies that resulted in the murder of hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women and children…………
Blair should be locked up in the tower of london for his crimes!
The begging question is: Did Blair comply with the Neocons in an effort to moderate Cheney and his puppet Bush? Or did he truly believe what his spin doctors fed him?
Tony Bliar is a lawyer by trade, how do they defend clients - do they encourage their clients to tell the truth all the time? If they did, then they would lose most of their cases. Who is to say whether his spin doctors were in control, or if Bliar instructed them to word documents in order to make a case for war.
I do know, that up to the final vote to go to war, there were substantial numbers of Labour back bench MPs who were against war. They were of course coerced and threatened by the whips, thereby going against the will of the people who elected them.
Remember Bliar’s comments after 9/11, when he referred to the kaleidoscope, and the pieces being in a state of flux, and this being the chance to re order the World.
I spoke to many people after 9/11 and later before the Iraq war, and some intelligent people shocked me with their views on why Iraq should be attacked. It’s clear to me that a lot of people just wanted revenge, and that, mixed with more than a little racism, meant that it was OK to bomb a Muslim country.
In the build up to war, the media became more frenzied, and the rhetoric from our politicians more hard line. It was obvious that the juggernaut had no brakes and was on a course which could not be altered.
We have to hope that the same thing doesn’t happen again with Iran.
CLUBCONNECTER
yes, the tower of london…… and throw away the keys……….
ANDYUK
it’s amazing what ‘intelligent’ people come out with at times. the other day i was told by one such person that AIDS does not exist………how can one deal with this kind of mentality?
Hi COCO — You rightly ask “how can one deal with this kind of mentality?”
For me love and compassion, with a realization that in KALI YUGA we are lucky to find kindred souls, as most people are naturally maddened by the state of the collective unconscious “conversation” that we all “hear” and share through the intertwined non-causal and non-physical realm.
The collective unconscious is beneath the subconscious mind, and we all access it during restorative dreamless sleep.
Acceptance (the having of it) and allowance of “what is” _ to _ be _, is a part of wisdom and peace — and is so much like water — in that the harder one grasps for it the less one gets.
R A I N B O W __ M E D I T A T I O N
The subtle vulnerability of openness while seeking one’s inner mysteries is best sought through focused awareness of ones breath while :
With these steps in a quiet peaceful setting, one will find access to true peace and acceptance - this is meditation.
I’ve found the above to be well serving my own PEACEFULNESS and one can also add the beneficial colors (breathing them in/out) associated with each the stages [progressing up the spine]: red (body), orange (feelings), yellow (mind), green (peace), blue (love), purple (aspire to the highest), white (beyond duality, connection of ALL).
Namaste … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … Mahatma Gandhi … … … … … … … … … …
« We must be the change we wish to see in the world »
« There is a sufficiency in the world for man’s need but not for man’s greed »
« We adopt the means of nonviolence because our end is a community at peace with itself » — ML King