EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Pregnant Anti-War Soldier Sent to Prison
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Time for Big Green to Go Fossil Free
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- The Downwinders: Fracking Ourselves to Death in America
Popular content
Today's Top News
Huge Beef Recall Issued As Result of Video Footage
The U.S. Department of Agriculture announced the largest beef recall in its history Sunday, calling for the destruction of 143 million pounds of raw and frozen beef produced by a Chino slaughterhouse that has been accused of inhumane practices.However, the USDA said the vast majority of the meat involved in the recall -- including 37 million pounds that went mostly to schools -- probably has been eaten already. Officials emphasized that danger to consumers was minimal.
The recall applies to beef slaughtered at the Hallmark/Westland Meat Packing Co. since Feb. 1, 2006. The company has produced no meat since Feb. 4 of this year, when operations were suspended.
The action came nearly three weeks after the Humane Society of the United States released a video showing workers at the plant using forklifts and water hoses, among other methods, to rouse cattle too weak to walk. In addition to issues of animal cruelty, the video raised questions about whether so-called downer cattle were entering the food chain in violation of federal regulations.
Although the Humane Society said at least four non-ambulatory cattle had been slaughtered for food, the USDA had repeatedly said it had no such evidence. On Sunday, federal officials said for the first time that they had evidence such cattle from Hallmark had been processed for food.
Downer cattle are not supposed to be used as meat unless a veterinarian determines that the animal stumbled or fell because of injury -- a broken leg, for instance -- that would not affect the safety of their meat. Cattle weakened by disease are not supposed to enter the food supply, although their risk of harming humans is still fairly low. There is, however, a slightly higher possibility that such cattle are suffering from bovine spongiform encephalopathy, better known as mad cow disease.
The USDA said there was only a remote possibility that the recalled beef from Hallmark could make people sick. Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer said it was "extremely unlikely" that any cattle processed at the plant were suffering from mad cow disease.
Steve Mendell, president of Hallmark Meat Packing and its distributor, Westland, declined to comment. The company has refused to answer questions about its practices since the Humane Society video surfaced. Mendell released a statement on Feb. 3 that said he was "shocked and horrified" by the video and that the company had a long history of meeting federal safety standards.
The recall was initiated voluntarily by the company, because the federal government does not have the authority to take such action.
Some supermarkets began removing Hallmark meat from their freezer shelves immediately after the USDA's announcement.
Managers at the Costco store in Burbank said they received an urgent e-mail about 3:30 p.m. Sunday, indicating that Westland had at one time been a supplier. It was unclear whether any current stocks had been provided by the plant.
"We're going to pull it just in case," said assistant warehouse manager Roland Prydz. He said the notice involved frozen beef.
Managers at Vons and Ralphs stores in Burbank and the Silverlake-Echo Park area said they did not recognize the company and doubted that it had supplied their stores.
Because Hallmark/Westland suspended operations in early February, it is unlikely that any of its fresh meat is still being sold. "That has a very [short] shelf life and refrigerator life, so the great majority has probably been consumed," Richard Raymond, the USDA's undersecretary for food safety, told reporters.
Hallmark/Westland meat was also sold to restaurant chains, including In-N-Out Burger and Jack in the Box, but both of those companies said they stopped using it early this month after the first reports of problems at the plant.
The amount of beef affected by the recall may be far larger than 143 million pounds because meat from different companies is often mixed as it goes through numerous processors. Such mixing makes it extremely difficult for consumers to know whether meat products came from a particular plant.
At a USDA telephone briefing Sunday for retailers, school districts and food safety experts, a Costco representative raised concerns about beef that gets "commingled," according to Humane Society President Wayne Pacelle, who participated in the conference call. He said the Costco representative estimated that the amount of beef recalled may top a billion pounds.
USDA officials said the whole effect of the recall was difficult to estimate because beef from Hallmark was supplied through a "huge pipeline" that included numerous processors and distributors.
As an example, Bill Sessions of the Agricultural Marketing Service told reporters: "Coarse ground beef . . . goes into further processors, who make end items such as cooked hamburger patties, chili meat, taco meat, that type of thing, that then goes into a distributor and then is distributed to a local school system."
By that time, the food packaging is not likely to carry any indication that a portion of the meat came from a particular plant.
Rep. George Miller (D-Martinez), who has been closely following the Hallmark case, called Sunday for a congressional hearing into the USDA's inspection process. Miller, who last week urged the Government Accountability Office to conduct independent investigations into the matter, said the "severity of this issue for both our nation's schools and consumers" made it necessary for Congress to step in.
One consumer advocate questioned whether the likelihood of danger from the recalled meat was as low as the USDA contended.
Caroline Smith DeWaal, food safety director for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a Washington-based consumer advocacy and research organization, said federal regulators "really don't know what conditions were making the cattle sick."
So, she said, "it is still possible some of them carried illnesses that pose a risk to the public."
DeWaal said the recall "really underscores the fact that consumers are losing confidence in the ability of the USDA to protect them from unsafe meat."
James O. Reagan, chairman of the Beef Industry Food Safety Council, issued a statement saying he supported the recall. "At the same time," he said, "we can say with confidence that the beef supply is safe." He said there were "multiple interlocking safeguards" in every beef processing plant so that a single lapse would not endanger consumers.
Before Hallmark, the largest meat recall involved Thorn Apple Valley's Forrest City, Ark., processing plant, which recalled 35 million pounds of hot dogs and pork and poultry luncheon products in January 1999 because of possible contamination with the bacteria that causes listeriosis, a dangerous condition that can lead to meningitis, among other potentially fatal diseases.
The USDA estimated that only about 8.4 million pounds of the recalled meat was recovered. However, no illnesses or deaths were reported in connection with consumption of the meat.
In September 2007, Topps Meat Co. recalled 21.7 million pounds of ground beef that may have been contaminated with E. coli bacteria. Thirty-eight people in eight states were found to have E. coli infections matching the strain.
The Hallmark/Westland recall stems from an investigation that began in October 2007 by the Humane Society. An undercover investigator started working for Hallmark wearing a concealed camera to document the plant's handling of animals for six weeks. The group said it chose the plant at random.
In December, the animal rights group turned over video showing treatment of animals at the plant between Oct. 3 and Nov. 14, to the San Bernardino County District Attorney's Office.
At the end of last month, the Humane Society made the video public. One section shows a manager using a paddle to hit a fallen cow in the face and eye in an attempt, authorities said, to urge the animal to its feet to be taken to slaughter.
The video's release led schools nationwide to pull beef from their menus out of concern that they may have received tainted meat from Hallmark, the second largest supplier of ground beef to the National School Lunch Program.
Schools in California were instructed to stop serving all dishes with ground beef, even those not supplied by Hallmark, because the at-risk beef was difficult to identify and isolate.
Within a few days, the Chino-based slaughterhouse fired two employees shown in the video and voluntarily halted operations. On Feb. 4, the USDA announced that it was suspending its routine inspections at the plant, in effect shuttering Hallmark.
At the time, the agency said the decision was based on evidence of inhumane treatment, not any risk to public health. USDA officials said there was no evidence of downer cattle entering the food supply, and expressed confidence in the USDA's inspection system.
Last Friday, San Bernardino County officials filed unprecedented felony and misdemeanor charges alleging animal cruelty against two Hallmark employees.
Police said the employees were using illegal methods in 11 different instances to force cattle to their feet and into the slaughter box.
That practice was banned in 2004, soon after an animal in Washington tested positive for mad cow disease.
The initial ban was temporary, and based on studies indicating that non-ambulatory cattle had a higher occurrence of the disease.
That ruling was finalized in July 2007, permanently prohibiting the use of downer cattle for human food.
Times staff writers Greg Krikorian, Evelyn Larrubia and Carla Rivera contributed to this report.
© The Los Angeles Times
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

27 Comments so far
Show All143 million pounds of misery.............
Kids are the most likely to get food born illnesses. And we give this shit to kids to eat.
This is what pure corporate capitalism gives us people! When it comes to food and healthcare shouldn't we demand better for our kids...
Thank god I don't eat factory farmed meat.
Centuries ago, the philosopher Rene Descartes developed further the Christian idea that all nonhuman animals are automatons that cannot feel pain. Followers of Descartes believed that if an animal cried out this was just a reflex, the sort of reaction one might get from a mechanical doll. Consequently, they saw no reason not to experiment on animals without anesthetics. Horrified observers were admonished to pay no attention to the screams of the animal subjects.
Of course, nothing has changed, and this belief is widespread among meat-eaters. Pejorative vivisection exists to this day. Meat-eaters are either stupid, bigoted or without compassion, or combinations thereof.
Recalling the meat is a whitewash step. What the USDA really ought to do is enforce the law at every slaughterhouse. Of course, better still would be dismantling the whole industrial meat system. Fat chance of the gov't doing anything like that.
How long will it take for our meat-eating culture to realize that this practice is completely barbaric and a hideous disfigurement on the face and soul of humanity.
Go vegetarian and experience a true and lasting inner peace.
"I can now look at you in peace. I no longer eat you."
-Franz Kafka (looking at fish in a pond)
The most important part of this announcement, in my opinion, is not that inhumane practices are used at slaughtering houses, or that slaughtering houses are producing meat from unhealthy animals, because we all already know this on some level, even those who claim to not care.
The most important part of this announcement is that the USDA's inspection practices, which cost the taxpayer a lot, failed to pick this up. Individual, concerned citizens had to expose this problem to the American public.
Thanks for nothing, USDA! Let's just be clear about what your role is: To provide assurances, even when they are unwarranted, to the American public that our meat-producing industry is following health, safety, and humane guidelines. You are just the front group that's lying to us for the meat-producing industry, and we are paying for you to do this.
This is yet one more example that clearly shows how corrupted and wasteful our system of government is, with its legalized bribery of public legislators and government officials. Meanwhile, we can't afford to provide health care for all, or to provide all of our children with good educations.
WE do give this to kids to eat. It's disgusting. Our family is mostly vegetarian and meat is never bought at the store, only from our farmer friend.
When will we wake up to the lack of nutrition in our diets?
the USDA, as I understand it, also oversees the school lunch program-a joke.
A sampling of my daughter's grade school hot lunch menu, I think, says it all:
Monday-Mini corn dogs
Tuesday-pizza sticks
Wednesday-Italien dunkers (breadsticks)
Thursday-Chicken nuggets (which part of the chicken is that?
Friday-Hamburger
My kids take a bag lunch.
The Cllinton administration had increased food inspections and food safety measures significantly. It is one of the first things the Bush administration trashed along with airline safety. Go figure.
What I can't help notice is how an organization dedicated to fighting animal cruelty isn't being given more credit and thanks for breaking this story. This article gives a one line mention of the organization and it's efforts. The purpose of the video was to expose animal cruelty, yet everyone is focused on the tainted meat issue. This default selfishness is to be expected I guess.
As worried parents talk about the possibility of their child getting sick, they fail to see the bigger issues surrounding the industry and our culture of disregard for other living species. How about feeding your kids less meat in general and teach them about respecting the planet and the animals we share it with?
Here's another one, deselby:
"While we ourselves are the living graves of murdered beasts, how can we expect any ideal conditions on this earth?"
--- George Bernard Shaw
Or Tolstoy: we will always have war as long as we have slaughterhouses.
Well we reap what we sew.
Rene Descartes was a fool-like many life scientists.
Democracy Now didnt mention the undercover footage in its news headlines today but it sure likes to waste time on frivolous stories like the writers strike.
When I first heard this story headlined on the news yesterday, that the largest meat recall in history was because of evidence of cruelty to animals, well of course my bullshit detector was going crazy.
"James O. Reagan, chairman of the Beef Industry Food Safety Council, issued a statement saying he supported the recall. "At the same time," he said, "we can say with confidence that the beef supply is safe.""
Uh -huh. And Osama Bin Laden and Sadam Hussein were bosom buddies.
If you think USDA is your safety net, think again. The program is an orphan, there are so few inspectors and they have no legal authority. This has been going on forever.
ummm, the video was taken TWO YEARS AGO!!!!!!!! why didn't HSUS break it sooner? the tainted meat is already eaten....
MAYBE WE SHOULD BE ASKING STEVE MENDELL.
so if we can have four cameras at every major intersection in every major city and minor town in the country, why not spy on the slaughterhouses as well?
lino wrote: why not spy on the slaughterhouses
Great suggestion! But cameras are forbidden in slaughterhouses, for the same reason they do not have windows. There would be images and videos of the inhumanity everywhere, and that may eventually kill the industry.
You see, meat-eaters are cowards, preferring to have no knowledge of that painful and filthy path that has been taken by that slab of flesh on a little white tray.
I am sick and tired of all of these re-called food issues. It is totally unacceptable that our government agencies cannot insure this type of crap doesn't occur. Our Congress is far more concerned, about issues such as baseball players using steroids.
~SEKHMETSAT~ Don't worry , they have plenty more tainted meat to offer up.
All meat is tainted.
Firing and prosecuting the employees is tantamount to the court martials of the grunts at Abu Graibh and letting their superiors off scot-free.
One of the many things the bush admin. put together was relaxing the laws regarding meat safety. My girlfriend tested meat for the usda, it happens way more often than you think in worse scenarios than you can imagine. Talk about a low paying job and intense working environment, understaffed and underfunded. How many companies test meat do you think? I don't know that.
Where's the Beef?
Back on the cow, where it belongs
Namaste … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … Mahatma Gandhi … … … … … … … … … …
« We must be the change we wish to see in the world »
« There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need but not for man's greed »
« We adopt the means of nonviolence because our end is a community at peace with itself » — ML King
Exactly how they treat "downer" working people today.
¿ What do you mean ALAN K ?
Like gut 'em, and then tell 'em to stuff it, while also getting ready to take another one for the 'ol gipper?
It's just plain gutless what these people did to these animals. Instead of punishing these people, they should have to face the same crap they dish out to the animals. Maybe they would change their ways if they had to go through something like this.
I also agree with sekhmetsat. If this happened two years ago, then this product is all ready gone, and why the heck did it take this long to make the public aware of this? As a meat eating culture, don't you think we should be made aware if the product is tainted? Just a few questions that should be answered by congress instead of wasting our time with Roger Clemens and the NFL's Spygate.
Here is another example of the consequences of diverting funding from issues that matter within the borders. Our nation worries so much about global terrorism, but if the basic necessities of life are tainted, shouldn't our fight begin there? The only way reform will come is with tragedy. It seems that standards are not changed until confronted with the sensation of loss. Sadly, we allow the media to choose which sensational tragedies it will cover, dependent upon the people/agencies involved.