EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
Popular content
Today's Top News
Restoring Democracy
While Maryland now allows former felons to vote, the battle isn't over
Last year, The Sun told the story of Damond Ramsey, a man who, after serving an 18-month prison sentence, went to work for an HIV testing and education program. But without the right to vote, he said he didn't feel like a full citizen.
"That change cannot be complete unless I can vote," he said. "My vote will make a difference in the lives of my children."
Fortunately, Maryland is one of several states that have restored voting rights for people who want to move on with their lives and integrate back into society. Last year, 52,000 people became eligible to vote after Gov. Martin O'Malley signed the Voter Registration Protection Act.
In 2006, the people of Rhode Island approved a constitutional amendment allowing formerly incarcerated people the right to vote upon leaving prison. And we have also seen progress toward voting rights restoration in Florida, which traditionally made it very difficult for people with felony records to regain the right to vote.
But even as voting restoration grows, we have a long way to go. In addition to the 11 states that continue to deny voting rights to people with felony convictions after they have completed their sentences, 35 states deny the right to parolees, and 30 states deny the right to those on probation. In a few states, including Virginia, felons are disenfranchised for life, with no appeal.
For a nation that depends on the participation of its citizens, it is fundamentally un-American to deny the vote to people who are living and working as law-abiding citizens. Furthermore, the more doors we close on people trying to rejoin society, the more likely it is we will drive them back to the behaviors we want them to leave behind.
That is why we are proposing a federal law - the Democracy Restoration Act - to allow people on probation or parole, or who have served their sentences, to freely exercise their fundamental right to vote.
Later this year, Americans will determine the next president of the United States. But millions remain disenfranchised because of a dangerous anachronism: civil death.
The principle of civil death, a vestige of the Middle Ages, declared that convicted criminals were outlaws - irrevocably expelled from society. Perhaps civil death made sense in a land of kings and peasants, but it has no place in America today. And yet it has endured: an estimated 4 million people with felony convictions have been stripped of their voting rights even though they have rejoined society.
Civil death in America has an explicitly racist past. It is no accident that it disproportionately affects African-Americans. Nationwide, 13 percent of all African-American men are disenfranchised; in some states, it is almost 25 percent. Like the poll tax and the grandfather clause, civil death was a tool of Jim Crow.
People on probation and parole are expected to obey the law, pay taxes and contribute to society. Those who commit crimes should pay the price. But once the criminal justice system has determined that they are ready to return to the community, they should receive the rights and responsibilities that come with that status, and should not continue to be relegated to second-class citizenship.
This movement by a number of states toward re-enfranchisement is a positive step, but civil death is a national problem that harms our democracy. Our proposed federal law would ensure that once people have served their time, their right to vote in a federal election would be restored. (We hope states would follow suit regarding state and local elections.) This approach also reduces administrative hurdles and Election Day confusion over who should and should not be allowed to vote.
There are many people across the country like Mr. Ramsey - people who broke the law, paid the price and now want to move forward with their lives by contributing to their city, their state and their country.
The continuing expansion of the franchise - to the poor, women, minorities and young people - is one of the greatest stories in our country's history. With Election Day less than nine months away, there is no time to lose in restoring our democracy for so many of our citizens.
Russ Feingold is a U.S. senator from Wisconsin. Jack Kemp is a former secretary of housing and urban development.
Copyright © 2008, The Baltimore Sun
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

27 Comments so far
Show AllThis is a problematic topic, and Feingold hasn't gone into sufficient detail here. Namely, not all felonies are created equally. We can divide them at least three ways:
blue-collar: murder, rape, assault, kidnapping, bank robbery, etc.
white-collar: fraud, racketeering, embezzlement. (the stuff of the mafia, convicted politicians, etc.)
national: espionage, treason.
If we wish to argue the restoration of voting rights after serving a sentence, the case seems strongest for the blue-collar felons. While they committed crimes, it was against a limited number of fellow citizens.
In the case of white-collar criminals, the crimes may have impacted a much greater number of people. Ken Lay, for instance (whatever island he is currently sipping martinis on). This is a difficult call.
In the case of the "national" felonies, I do NOT support a resoration of voting abilities. If someone commits treason, trades state secrets, etc. that's a one-way street -- entire nations can be put at greater risk, etc.
Ending the racist War on Drugs is the solution.
As for Ken Lay sipping coctails on some island, there is an island in the Grand Caymans named Hell. But, since Ken Lay has been dead for nearly two years, if he's sipping martinis anywhere it would be in hell not on Hell.
Right on, Feingold and Kemp! As a former correctional educator, it sickened me to hear people say "they should lock 'em all up and throw away the key" without ever thinking about the damage it would do if they actually got their wish. Thank you for speaking out on behalf of justice (as opposed to spite or revenge), as supporters of antiquated, classist, racist, laws preventing parolees and/or those on probation from voting do.
Russ Feingold and Jack Kemp: thank you for being voices of reason. Restoring voting rights should be a priority in this democracy.
You get the Democracy Restoration Act if, and only if, you get a Dem president to sign it. A Republican will veto it and crow "law and order" to the conservative base, implying that "you don't want jailbirds running your country, do you?"
Er, Paul why do you classify murder, rape, assault, alongside bank robbery? Since you argue along categories, murder, rape, etc. are not necessarily in the same group as assault (could be as simple as taking a couple of swings at someone who insulted one's mother) or bank robbery. Besides, bank robbery could also fit into your second category of white collar crime.
I prefer a simpler categorization of recoverable/irrecoverable crimes. However, the point is if the system releases such people back into society as it considers their debt paid, then it is logical to let them have the full privileges of a member of society.
For the record, I am not in favor of paroling anyone who commits murder, rape, sexual assault, or battery, i.e. violent crimes (loosely maps to irrecoverable). However, if the system allows one to rejoin society, then it also ought to make sure that they are ready for, and bestow on them, all the responsibilities and privileges that come with it.
The dividing of felony into 3 categories is an interesting way of thinking about it. But I think it makes more sense simply to restore voting rights when their sentence ends.
While it is appealing to deny traitors the right to vote,
a) if they're really that bad, they ain't getting out anyhow,
b) neocons have been telling me for years that I'm a traitor. Occasionally, vegans and gun-control advocates call me bad things too. (I believe in gun control but not enough for some).
After 9/11, an Oregon politician (ex-cop, surprise surprise) wanted to label jaywalkers as 'terrorists'. His reasoning is that protesters often walk in the street (no parade permit) because of lack of space on the sidewalk. Protesters 'hate' the government ergo they 'aid' our enemies. A terrorist label allows the PATRIOT Act (or the soon to come, Everyone Votes But Traitors Act) to be applied to them.
Be careful where you step.
Thought Shaman,
Felony crimes that entail physical force vs. those that don't. Blue-collar, white-collar. It would seem that all rape/assault/etc. must be blue-collar, whereas bank robbery can be either-or, depending on whether you work for the bank, deregulate policy, etc. or not. Also, I took the definition of felony from here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony. (Not all assaults are felonies, I'm referring only to those that are.)
Most societies have an excommunication mechanism whereby if you don't honor social pacts (politicians apparently are excluded), you lose membership/benefits/etc.
But how does prison actually allow someone to repay his debts? It's more like just keeping them off the street and denying their conjugal rights and other social roles. There are other models to measure social debt repayment, restorative justice being one of them. People that cause harm to society need to pay it back in some measurable way, not just cool off in prison for awhile.
Excluding former convicts from voting is certainly a legacy of the Jim Crow era.
A key element of rehabilitation is to give the ex-convict a sense of inclusion in society. People with "nothing left to lose" are the most likely to slide back into criminal behavior. I'd favor a "graduated" aproach, make restoration of voting rights an incentive for good behavior.
States could abuse this approach by denying restoration for failing to pay your electric bill on time... but there ought to be a way to manage it.
As for Ken Lay - if anyone ever had the means, motive, and opportunity to fake their own death, it's him. He's probably living in a private compound in Dubai and working for Halliburton now.
there is a video "A FORCE MORE POWERFUL" easily found at libraries and online. it tell how nonviolent civil disobedience has changed the modern world. it gives detailed instructions on how to get your country back. it shows real examples of people taking back their country. if you study and practice with others, you could start taking back the us by April or May.
complaining on buzzflash is worse than nothing because it gives you the false impression you are changing things. GET THAT VID.
YOUR VOTE HAS NOT COUNTED IN 8+ YEARS WHY DO YOU THINK IT WILL COUNT THIS YEAR! obama hillery mccain are not going to change the system but you can.
sacrifice and hardship is necessary but it would be worth it. the murderous thugs, congress and scotus wont give up their power without a fight.
What democracy? democracy in the US is just a facade. Consider this:
No independent election commission, unlimited influence of money, media giants deciding who will be allowed in (so called) debates, private companies controlling voting machines, a two-party duopoly system,....
The felony issue is but a small footnote.
Crimes are already categorized and they are not reported as "blue collar" vs. "white collar," although certain crimes are euphemistically referred to as "white collar."
There are a variety of crime reporting systems such as self-reports and victimization surveys, but generally, crimes are categorized as follows:
Crime incidents are reported monthly by law enforcement agencies to the FBI, which then compiles these statistics to produce its annual crime report known as the Uniform Crime Report (UCR). The UCR has been reporting nationwide FELONY statistics since 1930.
The UCR divides crimes into PART I offenses and PART II offenses.
PART I offenses are further divided into TWO FELONY categories: VIOLENT crimes and PROPERTY crimes. Combined, these are known as the EIGHT FBI INDEX CRIMES. These offenses are:
WILLFUL HOMICIDE (Violent),
FORCIBLE RAPE (Violent),
ROBBERY (Violent),
BURGLARY (Property),
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT (Violent),
LARCENY (OVER $50) (Property),
MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT (Property); and
ARSON (Property).
There are separate elements to each crime, as well.
In PART II, the following categories are tracked: simple assault, curfew offenses and loitering, EMBEZZLEMENT, FORGERY AND COUNTERFEITING, disorderly conduct, driving under the influence, drug offenses, FRAUD, gambling, liquor offenses, offenses against the family, prostitution, public drunkenness, runaways, sex offenses, stolen property, vandalism, vagrancy, and weapons offenses.
The crimes hi-lighted by large type under Part II are considered 'white-collar' or 'crimes in suites' (committed by snakes in suits--Con men/psychopaths), as opposed to 'crimes in streets' (index crimes).
These types of crimes are under-reported, but as we are all quickly learning, every bit as insidious and dangerous to the public as the index crimes--sometimes more so. These crimes often go unnoticed by the public because they are hidden from view and are generally committed by 'wealthy' and supposedly 'respectable' and 'well-educated' people. Hence, there is a disproportionate number of white collar criminals sitting in prison--where they belong--when juxtaposed against, usually, poor minorities who've committed relatively minor crimes by comparison.
White collar crime is committed everyday by unscrupulous corporations and corporate officials (Enron/Ken Lay) and Congressmen (Randy "Duke" Cunningham), for example. Corporate and political corruption and collusion in this country is rampant, affects millions of victims, and is often treasonous (Bush/Cheney, et al). White-collar crime deserves more attention and should, in my opinion, be elevated to a higher level on the UCR. It should probably have its own category because its affect on society is egregious and substantial.
I agree with Paul Bramscher. Those who are found guilty of political corruption, such as "the Dukester," or corporate corruption linked to the US Government (defense contractors), should never darken the halls of Congress or a voting booth again. With regard to other ex-felons, I agree with Feingold and Kemp: they should regain their rights to vote.
I further agree with Mr. Bramscher that Ken Lay's sudden 'death' shortly following his conviction was a little too, uh, convenient. These snakes in suits are the ultimate con artists, after all.
Russ Feingold and Jack Kemp must be joking. Civil Death is not the problem; it is a side show.
The election process is terminally corrupt. For example, many states which use electronic voting machines have no audit ability in the form of paper copies of ballots. One to two percent of the votes are miscounted or are not counted. Voter identity is not verified in many jurisdictions.
These above problems make voting an act of great faith or a waste of time.
If you want to influence the election process, just give huge amounts of money to your favorite candidate.
BTW Hillary Clinton will be the nominee for the Democratic party because she has the connections with the "old boy" network of her husband. Mr. Obama is a naive pone of the ruling elite.
Hoytdouglas. You are correct. The entire voting process has been corrupted and should be viewed skeptically--cynically, really--for it is about as legitimately a function of democracy as the congressional and judicial oversight process--nonexistent--and the entire US government, which ceased funtioning as a democracy years ago--if it ever did. Democracy, American-style, is a circus of fakery, propaganda, and pretense run by a bunch of con artists in expensive suits.
The 'fix,' as they say, is in. So, in this respect, the Feingold/Kemp proposal is really a moot issue because any vote for the 'wrong' candidate, whether cast by an ex-felon or otherwise, will never be counted.
Giovanna,
Since criminal justice, etc. are full-fledged disciplines, I had no doubts that they've categorized basically every crime imaginable (for their purposes). But for the purposes of restoring voting rights for convicted felons, it may be useful to divide along other lines.
I have to admit I read this thinking WTF. In a week where the US Senate has passed a bill authorizing warrantless spying on Americans and retroactive immunity for those who knowingly violated the law and compromised our rights, he's writing about this?
Don't get me too wrong. This is an important topic. My feeling is bluntly that every American gets a vote. Period. And its definitely just plain wrong to tell someone that because of a past mistake for which they've paid a debt to society and served their time, that they still aren't allowed to be a full citizen with the same meaningless vote the rest of us gets.
But still, I really doubt this is even the biggest threat to democracy this week.
BTW, I don't really think Obama is naive.
In the 1990's, some people came up to George W. Bush and told him that if he'd just do exactly what they said that they'd make him President.
In this decade, some people came up to Obama and told him that if he'd just do exactly what they said, that they'd make him President.
I don't think he's naive. Just a puppet, that's all. Next year, when the Obama puppet replaces the Dubya puppet, we can all celebrate. Then the next day we can go back to protesting the war, or protesting the government doing something that favors the corporations and that screw us, or protesting the government taking away more of our rights. Cause all of that ain't gonna change a bit with the new puppet on TV as President.
Paul Bramscher-
I agreed with you. I believe that any ex-felon who was found guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors should never have his or her voting rights restored. This seems fairly straight-forward.
People like Ken Lay need the government to get away with their crimes, specifically through deregulation, collusion, and lack of oversight. If the US government had been doing its job, "Kenny Boy," as Bush affectionately referred to him, should never have been able to get away with stealing millions of dollars and destroying the lives of millions of innocent people. If I believed in the concept of hell, which I don't, I'd like to think there's a very uncomfortable place somewhere reserved for nefarious people like Mr. Lay.
As pointed out by Hoytdouglas, however, the entire issue is really moot, because the entire voting process has been corrupted. Before we start worrying about the voting status of ex-criminals, we need fix the voting system AND, more importantly, to find a solution to the cabal of felons currently inhabiting the US government. I think it will be a while....
This whole thread is a joke, right? Feingold and Kemp? Give me a break. Anyone who is actually trying to make a serious comment is a moron.
Restoring voting rights has the sound of a true Democracy, doesn't it?
Too bad there are a few hundred "superdelegates", thanks to the DNC, that are positioned with the power to decide the future for every voter in this country. It's "business as usual" in Washington, DC. - make no mistake about it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_2008_United_States_Democratic_Party_Superdelegates_%28by_endorsement%29#Hillary_Clinton_endorsements
TAKE A NEW ATTITUDE.I AM A CONVICTED FELON FROM THE US TREASURY,IRS,FOR EXCISE TAX EVASION OF 1500. DOLLARS.THEY ARE JUST A BUNCH OF LIARS AND THUGS AND IF YOU HAVE NO MONEY AND USE A COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY YOUR A LOSER BEFORE YOU EVEN GET STARTED.IM 58 YEARS OLD, VOTED CONSERVATIVE SINCE I WAS 21, A VIETNAM VET,HAD A NY STATE CONCEALED PISTOL PERMIT FOR 16 YEARS, NEVER ARRESTED OR EVEN IN TROUBLE, AND HAVE 7 CHILDREN AND NOW I LOST MY VOTE IN 1999.SINCE I COULDNT BEAT THIS GOVT AT THEIR GAME I NOW PLAY IT MY WAY. I HAVE CONVINCED ALL 4 OF MY SONS NOT TO JOIN THE MILITARY BECAUSE THIS COUNTRY WILL ONLY SCREW YOU IN THE END, PLUS EDUCATING THEM ABOUT OTHER GOVT. ANTICS. SO THEY CAN KEEP THIER VOTE AND WE CAN PONDER WHO THE REAL CRIMINALS ARE. ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTLY.OH, BY THE WAY THE JUDGE SAW THROUGH THIS AND ONLY GAVE ME PROBATION AND SAID NO RESTITUTION OR PENALTY JUST A 50 ASSESMENT CHARGE. BUT OF COURSE 1 YEAR LATER THE IRS AMENDED MY RETURNS AND SOMEHOW NOW I OWE 250 THOSAND DOLLARS BECAUSE I WAS GUILTY.I HAD 1 YEAR TO APPEAL THIS BUT OF COURSE WHEN I ASKED FOR MY RECORDS BACK HOW CONVIENT THEY WERE DESTROYED BY THE IRS AFTER 6 MONTHS. THERES PROBABLY THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE WITH SITUATIONS LIKE MINE AND WE WONDER WHY PEOPLE GO OF THE DEEP END.
#
Daniel David February 15th, 2008 12:49 pm
"You get the Democracy Restoration Act if, and only if, you get a Dem president to sign it. A Republican will veto it and crow "law and order" to the conservative base, implying that "you don't want jailbirds running your country, do you?""
And if that's the case why didn't Clinton sign such legislation during his eight years in office?
Lobo Gris
"[T]he more doors we close on people trying to rejoin society, the more likely it is we will drive them back to the behaviors we want them to leave behind."
Good observation, there. That should be applied to international society as well. Including so called "terrorists" - real or potential - and states in which they live, states that then happen to "harbor" terrorists.
In short, accepting the fact that division-lines between people are always mental constructs, we're all part of the greater US and should keep differentiations soft – and doors open – enough for all to potentially enjoy life together.
That way it's likely the greater US will find it easier to in turn be accepted into the even greater community of Life, enhancing our possibilities to reconcile with Nature that now reacts against US with Climate extreming as blowback – literally – and other blowbacks pending.
When we close off others, we close our self off too. There's no such thing as a two-way one-way street. Trying to construct a street that works two ways from only one direction (which is what attempts at complete unilateral control amounts to) simply doesn't work.
We're all one, the one that's us - we're all us. The fact that we're all US needs to be reconciled in practice with the "general welfare" and "the pursuit of happiness" ( i.e. peace and love). That will take getting our common impulses to reject and control under more relaxed control. With the inherent paradoxes there recognized and accepted.
Or else "this planet ain't big enough for both of US" - the Included and the Others.
Some people locking up or locking out other people is always a kind of civil war for peace. Only when the conflict is resolved can everyone feel completely at peace. The reverse is also true: unresolved conflict with convicts means no one can feel completely at peace. A civil society means people being civil to each other. Naive as it may sound, it remains true.
Okay, so the rights of huge numbers of legal adults in America are being taken from them because they were once convicted of a crime? What's the big deal?
I mean, since an eighteen-year-old is a legal adult and can vote and join the military and get married, but can't legally buy a drink at his or her wedding, doesn't that mean that the legal rights of huge numbers of legal adults in America are being taken from them without their ever having committed a crime? And by insurance companies, at that.
I think ticonderoga is missing the point. Eighteen year olds can vote; felons cannot. Eighteen year olds can, theoretically, change the situation, whereas felons cannot.
Going further up the comment list, I don't agree with the three categories of crimes listed by Paul Bramscher. All of his categories still entail a crime against the person or property of a non-consenting other. All of Paul's listed categories of crimes - crimes with a victim - still allow one convicted of them to attend college with federal government funding, still allow the felon to access public housing and welfare programs, still allow the felon to drive a tractor-trailer to earn a living (as an example). Whereas one convicted of a crime that harms neither the person nor the property of a non-consenting other - i.e. drug crimes, prostitution, etc. - is denied access to public housing and welfare, denied federal college funding, and yes, they are denied the opportunity to drive a tractor-trailer because of it. Additionally, the drug felon is denied the right to vote and cannot hope to change the ridiculous situation their government has placed them in. (After all, lest we forget, it is not the drug that causes the problem, it is the laws enacted against them that is causing the problem.) The results of a felony conviction for a victimless crime is a life sentence.
If any candidate for President that is touting "change" does not examine the War on Drugs and its miserable track record of keeping families separated, individuals uneducated and people out of the voting booth, then that particular candidate offers no hope of real change.
In Canada voting is considered to be a fundamental human right of such significance that polls are held within all prisons.