EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
'Taxi to the Dark Side'
A nation betrayed, a nation's conscience stained
Dilawar was 22 when he was killed. He left behind a wife and a 2-year-old daughter, as well as brothers, a father and the friends and neighbors who had watched him grow into a young man in the small peanut-farming village of Yakubi.
Yakubi sits at latitude 33.4608 degrees north, longitude 69.99 degrees east, in a high valley in mountainous eastern Afghanistan. If you type those coordinates into a Google Maps search, you can zoom in and out of satellite photos confirming that Yakubi is in the middle of nowhere.
Lacking a knack for farming, Dilawar - it was the only name he bore - started driving a taxi, a used Toyota his family bought him. He died on Dec. 10, 2002, hanging from his wrists from a wire-mesh ceiling, his arms spread above him, his head fallen forward and to the side, his feet barely touching the ground. He was alone.
The official death certificate for Dilawar, signed by coroner Dr. Elizabeth A. Rouse, listed the "mode of death" as "homicide." The cause was "blunt force injuries to lower extremities complicating coronary artery disease." More descriptively, Dilawar's legs had been hit repeatedly, hundreds of times, until the tissues inside had broken down and turned to pulp. Internal blood clots then had broken free, traveled to his heart, lodged in a partially blocked artery and stopped the flow of blood.
Dilawar died in the custody of the U.S. Army at Bagram Collection Point, a prison and interrogation facility about 30 miles north of Kabul. He had been there a little less than five days. Dilawar had done nothing to merit detention and knew nothing that merited interrogation. He was beaten to death by the United States of America.
Dilawar's story serves as the moral center of "Taxi to the Dark Side," a non-fiction film that opens at the Tivoli Theatre in St. Louis on Feb. 22. That is two days before the broadcast of the 80th Academy Awards in which "Taxi" is a nominee for best documentary feature.
Written and directed by Alex Gibney, "Taxi" is meticulously photographed, edited and scored. As filmmaking, it is as artful as it is emotionally involving.
Its facts, however, are not revelatory. News of Dilawar's death at Bagram and its official classification as a homicide first appeared in a March 2003 story, datelined Yakubi, by New York Times reporter Carlotta Gall. It took two more years of reporting by her stateside colleague Tim Golden, with assistance from Gall and other reporters, to unearth the horrific details of Dilawar's treatment as recounted in a 2,000-page secret criminal investigative report by the Army.
Golden's extraordinary stories were published in May 2005. They explained that local operatives of an Afghan warlord who had shelled a U.S. base had shifted suspicion, falsely, to Dilawar and three passengers in his taxi. American forces fell for it and took the men into custody. The three innocent passengers eventually were shipped to the prison at Guantanamo, where they languished for years before being sent home. Dilawar was taken to Bagram.
Yet "Taxi to the Dark Side" can not be written off as old news. With the outrage of Dilawar's torture and death as its driving narrative force, "Taxi" gathers disparate threads and weaves them into a sharp-edged picture of how far from our core beliefs our country has veered in the last seven years.
The film is methodical and relentless. It covers President Bush's declaration - later invalidated by the U.S. Supreme Court - that prisoners held by American forces are not necessarily covered by the Geneva Conventions. It shows Vice President Cheney on "Meet the Press" shortly after 9/11 telling host Tim Russert, in effect, that battling terrorists will require U.S. intelligence forces to adopt their tactics, to go to the "dark side."
"Taxi to the Dark Side" recounts the creation of the Justice Department's infamous torture memo of August 2002 - withdrawn in 2004, then secretly redrafted in 2005 - redefining the term to permit almost any technique. It includes the December 2002 authorization of extreme interrogation methods - later rescinded after protests from military lawyers - by then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, and it points out that some of those methods were used at Bagram on Dilawar and many others.
And by no means does the film overlook the related prisoner-abuse scandal at Abu Ghraib in Iraq and the arbitrary denial of basic legal rights to prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay, the latter now under a second review by the Supreme Court.
Adding to the film's force are on-camera interviews with many key players, including former military and government officials, civilian lawyers who have been drawn into various aspects of the story, Times reporters Gall and Golden and, most chillingly, some of the U.S. soldiers who beat Dilawar.
Last summer, a former commandant of the U.S Marine Corps and a former lawyer who served in the White House of President Reagan wrote an oped piece for the Washington Post denouncing an executive order issued by Bush. The order claims to interpret the Geneva Conventions in ways that permit extreme and abusive treatment of prisoners by the CIA. The authors wrote that Bush's order "compromised our national honor and . . . may well promote the commission of war crimes by Americans."
The authors did not point out that the Military Commissions Act of 2006 includes provisions that attempt to immunize American officials - retroactively - from responsibility for war crimes committed in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere.
"Taxi to the Dark Side" does not rant. It does not screech. Its tone is quietly authoritative and, in its treatment of Dilawar and his captors, elegiac. It addresses the tragedy of Dilawar's senseless death, but it also finds some measure of understanding for soldiers caught up in the whirlwind of a chaotic war that has been mismanaged and manipulated by the military and civilian chain of command above them.
But the film's larger point is that there is tragedy here for all Americans. The leaders to whom we turned after 9/11 for protection, reassurance and wisdom turned out to be frightened little men and women who had no faith in the enduring strength of American principles. They betrayed our principles and they betrayed us. History will record their stewardship as a stain on the nation's conscience.
Copyright © 2008 St. Louis Post-Dispatch L.L.C.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

14 Comments so far
Show AllFrom the obvious lack of thought and discussion by the CDers on this topic, I guess we all fall into that veil of 'cognitive dissonance'and refuse to even countenance just how far this country and its citizens have traveled into the reality of denying humanity, both for ourselves and 'others'.
The US does not torture anymore. We use tazers and waterboarding. Nothing that can be proved by a coroner.
Dahr Jamail has been almost alone in reporting the terrible impact of the invasion on ordinary Iraqis. This article and the film it discusses are a welcome addition to Dahr Jamail's great, on-going work in Iraq.
Does Dilawar's case meet Alberto Gonzales' standard for torture? Those who remain neutral side with tyrants.
My younger son lives in Washington and caucused for Obama. He told me a friend who also caucused for Obama brought some quotes from Obama and Clinton about torture to his caucus group. Obama stated he did not support torture under any circumstances and Clinton said the "ticking time bomb" scenario represented a narrow exception to her opposition to torture. Her supporters said Hillary didn't say that, she would never support torture. And voted for her. Well yes, she did say that, in October of 2006.
My point is, people in this country aren't living in reality, they are living in denial, believing what they want to believe, with no regard for facts. Including some liberals, whose belief system is as faith based as any fundamentalist Christian. But by denying what they don't want to face, they abandon their ethical standards, as has Hillary Clinton. And that becomes a slippery slope. It's like racing on the Nevada salt flats. If you stray off the line, you will never see it again. Is it true even today that most Americans have no idea of the horrific things we are doing abroad? Or are they uneasily not thinking about it?
I was hoping to see SiCKO win an Oscar for best documentary film, but I think it is more important for Taxi to the Dark Side to have that award. It is wrong for Americans to hide in their comfort zone.
kathyodat
Oh, but I bet Diliwar told them where the ticking bomb in Nebraska was. Or maybe it was Idaho. So it's OK, and the soldiers did the right thing, and so has the Leader.
All of the architects of these wars are guilty of enormous war crimes. The day they are finally tried, prosecuted, and punished would usher in a world celebration. Visualize people dancing in the streets around the world and Dick Cheney and his sundry cohorts in orange jump suits.
A second American revolution is required to address these grotesque crimes.
""Taxi" gathers..a sharp-edged picture of how far from our core beliefs our country has veered in the last seven years."
We haven't veered away from anything. This is fulfillment. We've been doing this shit in the basements of American Cop Shops for 100 years. Fact. We're just out front now.
We've become so "out front" our Masters are going to do it to the nice white folks now.
Taser out in public - then hang you by your wrists and beat you til you die....
There is no LAW for Authority. LAW is only for YOU so that YOU can be held in your chains.
The rest is all puppet theater and public relations. We do that good too.
RIP
Who can count the innocent vicims tortured to death in our Hundred Year's War (New American Century)? There will be enough for a fresh kill on every Evangelical Rood.
All concerned are absolute pieces of crap. Period.
torture, death penalty, tasers, water-boarding...
Not justice but revenge.
We have been satiating our lust for revenge. And justice suffers.
Discovery acquired rights to broadcast the film once its theatrical cycle is complete — but abruptly abandoned plans to air it, according to its maker.
Discovery says it opted out because the film is suddenly too "controversial" for them and they worry it might upset their investors. The US military is a frequent contributor to Discovery Channel programming.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This viewer no longer has any interest in this Military Propaganda Channel or any Senator who funds same.
VOICE FROM THE DARK SIDE
What would you say of German newspaper editors who knew about Auschwitz, Dachau and Buchenwald during the Nazi regime and didn't publish it, didn't make it available for public scrutiny? Should they have been held accountable as willing accomplices in the destruction of human rights, of lives, of crimes against humanity? Or what about their Soviet counterparts who knew about the gulags?
Perhaps this is an unfair comparison. Those editors did not live in societies that allowed them the right to criticize. But we do! By not exercising their obligations as powerful voices of a free press in a free society, the managers of The Discovery Channel should rightly be held accountable (highly unlikely) for consciously withholding essential information from the public regarding the destruction of human rights in the prolonged illegal imprisonment and the upcoming kangaroo court of those accused of the events of 9/11. These prisoners may indeed be guilty of that crime. But fundamental to our concept of law, they were to have been considered innocent until proven guilty, allowed adequate council, the right of habeus corpus, and certainly not subjected to even the appearance of torture.
Indeed, "Taxi to The Dark Side" is a controversial film and for that very reason it needs to be available to a well-informed public. We cannot allow the Discovery Channel to claim "a business decision" in order to whitewash their complicity in the destruction of legal and human rights. Having bought this important film they are not only refusing to show it but also knowingly preventing others from broadcasting it on national television.
May their managers and stockholders sleep well.
The Discovery Channel is largely owned by John Malone and Si Newhouse, two of the most reactionary sons of bitches in the world. They did not buy "Taxi to the Dark Side" to air it. They bought it to squash it.
what i'm about to say.... well, i need help sorting some of this out and gaining some other perspectives in order to get my head around it. i thought that writing it out would help organize my thinking a little better, and this seemed a good place to start.
SUPPORT THE TROOPS? does that include soldiers who take pleasure in torture, rape, murder? who leave their precious military in order to escape the chains of the uniform code of military justice and then join blackwater or some such mercenary group for the big bucks and big guns?
fuck 'em!
this is NOT a draft army. these are volunteers. i agree and grant you that there are many who enlist with noble purpose or out of desperate financial need. but then they find themselves, like many cops who join the force with noble intentions, in an artificial reality. they eagerly adopt the outlook, perspective, and "code" of their "brother/sister soldiers". the "thin blue line." "all that stands between you (the public) and chaos", or anarchy, or communism, or terrorists, or whatever. they are in the ultimate faith-based community, and adopt the classic "us versus them" mentality, them being the much-derided "civilian types."
this is why martial law and a military coup would be successful in the u.s.
i've been there. i know. i remember how many in the military - especially those not in the line of fire every day - bitterly regretted our withdrawal from SE Asia. they missed the excitement, the combat pay, the rapid advancement, and all the pretty medals.
the number of people who are able to split their personality, putting on the proper attitude along with a uniform every morning and then shedding both every evening, is small (especially in an all-volunteer force). the wear-and-tear on their psyches is considerable. standing up to superiors and to those on whom your life depends is extremely difficult. saying no, or "ratting out", becomes life-endangering and makes one an outcast. remember, even in Vietnam, where the U.S. occupying force was comprised, for the most part, of pissed-off, disgruntled, reluctant draftees, the My Lai massacre and all the other war crimes were carried out by the kid next door, ex-Little Leaguers, former altar boys, good wholesome american boys.
i'm sure every German/Japanese community in the 1930s and 40s supported their troops. i'm sure the families of every SS soldier wept proudly at their sons' bravery and devotion to homeland.
military service attracts sadists and patriots. too many of the patriots get swept up in the military's virtual reality: separated from the communities in which they are based, with different hair styles, distinct uniforms, their own convoluted, code-laced language. those who are not forever altered are psychologically damaged (if not killed).
when all you have to drink in the desert is the kool-aid....