America's Forgotten Genocide
Lost amid the controversy surrounding golf journalists' use of loathsome imagery in discussing biracial superstar Tiger Woods is its root cause. It's not bigotry, although as recent events in Jena, La., point out, there's no shortage of racially motivated hatred in our society. No, the real culprit behind nonchalant references to "lynching" is lack of education - Americans' ignorance about the systematic campaign of terror waged against people of color in the 19th and 20th centuries.
Kelly Tilghman, the Golf Channel broadcaster who was suspended for facetiously suggesting that Woods be lynched in a back alley to make the professional tour more competitive, and David Seanor, the now-fired Golfweek editor who displayed a noose on his magazine's front cover, are hardly alone. Too few of us appreciate the enormity of the struggles that confronted freed slaves and their descendants after emancipation.Thanks to our society's reverence for the Greatest Generation and a renewed emphasis on teaching the moral necessity of World War II, most Americans can recite atrocities committed by Nazi Germany during the Holocaust. But few of us can discuss in detail what some historians call the Black Holocaust - a century of American apartheid that stretched from the end of Reconstruction to the attack dogs turned loose on civil rights protestors in Selma.
Too harsh an analogy? Well, consider this: in all its depravity, the Third Reich lasted little more than a decade. America's subjugation of black people lasted many times longer. Indeed, the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of freed slaves still lived in fear of being lynched if they failed to observe a code of racial etiquette that forced them to bow and scrape at every turn. During the despicable reign of Jim Crow, most blacks were not only denied their inalienable rights but prevented from receiving a meaningful education or earning a decent living.
The vigilante terrorist group known as the Ku Klux Klan experienced a dramatic rebirth in 1915. Moviegoers that year cheered white horsemen as they saved damsels from marauding black solders in the Civil War epic "Birth of a Nation." Director D.W. Griffith's depiction of history was hideously off-base, but it served as such effective propaganda that Nazi filmmakers later emulated his techniques. Somewhere between 2 and 4 million Americans - a majority of them from the North - joined the Klan over the next few years, all vowing to maintain white supremacy. At rallies in the nation's capital, thousands of white-robed Klansmen defiantly marched down Pennsylvania Avenue. Cowed lawmakers refused to crack down against the KKK.
We'll never know how many black lives perished in racial violence. A University of Illinois study suggests that, between 1882 and 1930, white mobs murdered a black man, woman or child somewhere in America nearly once a week, every week.
Perpetrators were almost never brought to justice. Authorities and judges looked the other way; lynching was seen as a justifiable response to black people getting too "uppity" for their own good.
America's racial genocide took other forms. So many bloody race riots broke out in mid-1919 that it was dubbed the "Red Summer." Two years later, a racial conflagration in Tulsa was sparked when a white woman claimed - falsely, it turns out - that she had been accosted by a young black male. Horrific rioting devastated 30-plus city blocks, leaving homeless 10,000 mainly poor people.
To black writer Ralph Ellison, such outrages were "invisible" to the white majority. Sociologist Gunnar Myrdal argued that Northerners of conscience suffered from the "convenience of ignorance."
Nine decades later, that same malady infected Tilghman and Seanor. The two would never have made similarly casual references to the Holocaust because they've been taught its incalculable horror. Not for one millisecond would Seanor have considered running a picture of a swastika on Golfweek's cover. And human decency would have stopped Tilghman from joshing, "Yeah, for the good of the tour, Woods needs to be incinerated at Auschwitz."
Yet because they lack perspective on their own country's segregationist history, these two presumably well-intentioned journalists - who, between them, probably don't have a bigoted bone - made gaffes that will taint the rest of their careers. They should have known better. But until our schools and churches rededicate themselves to teaching young people the macabre realities of America's racist past, Tilghman and Seanor will continue to have plenty of company.
Timothy M. Gay is a Washington-based writer and historian. His next book will explore the interracial baseball barnstorming tours of Satchel Paige.
© Copyright 2008 Globe Newspaper Company
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
31 Comments so far
Show AllGenocide may well have happened to any number of distinct ethnic Africans in the Atlantic slave trade. We'll never know. What we do know is that all of the slaves were de-culturized and de-ethnified by the policies that the slave owners put in place in North America. Such that the people who are currently descendants of that 'peculiar institution' US style, are in the position of having been effectively transferred away from their original ethnicity; i.e., from who they were, into a unique cultural entity, disparate yet joined by a common language, English, the new language they were forced to learn in order to communicate in this country. They also share many aspects of food, music, religion and more. This both literally and figuratively qualifies as genocide: "Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."
Slavery has existed for a very long time, long before the US experiment, but the histories that I have read all make it clear that the racial, perpetual, and stigmatization, based on imputed inferiority, was especially cruel and uniquely American. Other countries and peoples, including the Arabs and Greeks, did not have a legal policy to keep people as slaves forever, their status as slaves didn't pass down to descendants, and there was generally a way to end their slave status. Not in any way to make apologies for any form of slavery, but we need to reflect on just how much more distorted and vicious was our own. For which we have never made amends, apologies, or reparations and that is long over due.
Speaking of which, the new Australian Labor government will apologize formally to the indigenous people of Australia for the terrible history of killings, land theft, and other genocidal abuses the white Australians committed (and continue to commit) against the indigenous people. I hope someday that the USA will take those steps, and more, toward the native peoples of the USA and to the descendants of the slaves. There are so many reasons to be ashamed.
"MeAlsoToo - Thanks for the link! This will make interesting and informative reading. I have been studying history lately with and attempt to understand who we are, based on who we have been. European expansionism decimated many cultures."
All are 'most welcome' -- I believe all SHOULD be studying-History lately, since 'it' was been working against our mutual/real-interests for a L-O-N-G and predictable time-now...
'Sunlight is a fine antiseptic...'
Getting back to the specifics of lynching, it's worth remembering that the lynchings of the Jim Crow era were a form of HONOR KILLING- yes, that's right, the abhorrent practice that is supposedly restricted to the most "backward" sections of the Muslim world has existed here, too. The perverse logic went something like this: a white woman gets "defiled" by sleeping with (or hugging, or just making eye contact and smiling at) a black man, so he must be killed. Kind of puts things in perspective when you hear white Southern Republicans talk in one breath about Confederate "heritage" and in another breath condemn the "barbarism" of honor killings in the Middle East. Think about it.
Many nations emerged when one nation of people took state power and then proceeded to: exterminate, ethnically cleanse, culturally destroy (ethnocide), enslave and/or reconstruct as permanent minorities those nations that didn't gain state power, but resided within that state's territory.
The holocaust/genocide/ethnocide instigated by the Nazi both within their nation-state and their conquered territories was not only aimed at European Jews.
Another ethnic group that Nazis attempted to exterminate were the European Gypsies. Another ethnic group slated for genocide and ethnocide were the Slaves: Poles, Ukranians, Russians, Serbs.
For Russians and Poles there was a planned severe reduction of both populations. The intelligencia and Communist Party members were to be exterminated to both destroy their cultures and any threat of any possible future anti-Nazi leadership cadres and organizations.
Those small numbers of Poles and Russians that were to be allowed to survive would be afforded the very limited education needed to serve as slaves for future German colonists.
All communists, democratic socialists, and anarchists were to be eleminated. In other words, a holocaust was directed toward those people who held and acted on those Leftist political ideals. (This political holocaust had an older German pedigree. At the end of his tenure, Bismarck suggested exterminating and imprisoning all members of the German Social Democratic Party.)
In addition, people of certain non-Jewish relgious faiths like Unitarians, pacifist Protestant sects like Jehova Witnesses etc.were scheduled to be imprisoned and, in the majority of cases, executed.
Last, gays, the mentally and physically "defective", and the "anti-social" were scheduled to be exterminated. (Though in this instance, the Church effectively stopped the slaughter and torture of the mentally ill, deformed, etc. Of course, it didn't protest the slaughter of other holocaust victims.)
Today, we have been trained to view certain groups as disposable and/or dangerous. For example, the imprisonment or killing of hundreds thousands (if not millions) of actual (or people labeled as) communists and/or socialists by Suharto, Pinochet, Videla, Montes, Sadam Hussein, Marcos, Somoza, Lon Nol, Chang Kai Chek, and the many other US-supported dictators was (and is) considered justifiable by most Americans.
Thus, the multiple Nazi holocausts of WWII, has expropriated by people of the Jewish faith.
Thanks TJ for your discussion of the details of the slavery genocide. The stats are important. I once wondered about this question: What if we could go back in time and actually see the middle passage on a slave ship? I never thought it possible, but I looked around and came across an article that had an actual close-up photo on a ship.
Here is a link to a photo of some captured slave boys and young men:
http://www.movinghere.org.uk/search/catalogue.asp?sequence=4&resourcetypeID=2&recordID=60734
It is a close-up view of slaves and gives me a feeling of being there.
Here are details about the photo of the slave boys:
"Partner: The National Archives (PRO)
Reference: FO 84/1310
Description: This photograph is dated 1 November 1868, one of the earliest and most important photographs in the Moving Here Catalogue, and reveals a very little of the terrible suffering caused to millions of people by the slave trade. This group of severely emaciated boys and young men from East Africa are pictured on the lower deck of the Royal Naval ship HMS Daphne. They were taken on board from a dhow. The captain of the Royal Naval ship had instructions not to return the rescued slaves to the place on the coast where they had been put on the slave ship (presumably because they were in danger of being recaptured by traders) but it is not clear from the available documentation what happened to them afterwards."
That photo makes it real for me. I wonder what happened to those boys? It is so sad.
The following link goes to the article where I first saw the photos. The first (which you can click on and zoom to make larger) shows the slave boys on the HMS Daphne. The other photo shows a panned-back view of many slaves on the deck of that ship.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/3101563.stm
MeAlsoToo - Thanks for the link! This will make interesting and informative reading. I have been studying history lately with and attempt to understand who we are, based on who we have been. European expansionism decimated many cultures.
If anyone wants a nice, broad, look at indigenous culture in the pre-Columbian America's, I recommend reading the book 1491 by Charles C. Mann http://www.powells.com/biblio/2-9781400032051-4. He does a good job of looking at all the facts, and alternate interpretations, rather than just those accepted by Europeans seeking justification for the disaster they have wrought upon the world.
"But I don't believe there were ten million Indians within the lower 48, let alone Doom n Gloom's one hundred million."
militantliberal, here are two sources that provide the numbers at one hundred million and above.
Charles Mann puts the numbers at 112,000,000
http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=1096412113
http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=1096412156
David Stannard puts the numbers at 100,000,000
http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0195085574/ref=sib_dp_pt/104-6668627-9400719#reader-link
Please...the Black 'holocaust' (not really a "holocaust" anyway, because it was NOT a deliberate/intended Sacrifice&"burnt-offering") was peanuts as far as American-genocide goes...
[Click my Name -- or read: http://www.ahealedplanet.net/columbus.htm and you'll agree...]
Mr. Gay should have called this article: "America's Forgotten Genocide(S)". Aryan (male) Supremacy has been bred to the bone for more than 3000 years and it ain't gone yet. 35-50 million dead indigenous people in this hemisphere between the Celt & Latin Aryans who came to these lands as Conquerors in search of gold, booty, and slaves.
That is why RACISM runs to the core of who and what AmeriKa is to this day. Yup we did the Voting Rights and Civil Rights Acts and we then broke our collective arm patting ourselves on the back. Then we went to work.
We quadrupled the prison population and reversed the prison demographics in 40 years. 1965 640000 humans in the penal system. White people are 87% of the population and comprise 80% of the penal system: Jail, Prison, or Parole. Through an organized program of targeted incarceration, selective enforcement of the law, and disproportionate sentencing we now have 2.3/2.4 million humans in the penal system and 2/3 are Black & Brown. Black people are still 12% of the population as they were in 1965.
And yes, we white people are always driven into hysterical rage whenever we hear that there are still Indigenous people alive in the death camps we set up for the survivors. When we hear that they not only survived our deliberate starvation, our germ warfare, and massacres - and now they have Casinos and white people give them their money - they go nuts.
Cornel West asked his not-so-rhetorical question a long time ago and I've never heard 'official America' give a response: "Can America exist without White Supremacy?"
The short answer is: They better because within two generations they will be a numeric minority in the land they committed genocide to own. White people will be swimming in an ocean of humans the color of the Earth. But not to worry.
I'm sure the new majority of color will treat the white minority with the same expansive Xrstian charity white people have always shown to their subjugated populations. But white people will have to learn to be patient and wait in the place, assigned to them (red-lined if you will) by the majority. Nobody likes to see an angry white face, do they. White faces are always more pretty when they smile, don't you think. Almost human.
Peace.
Quicky Google Search of Middle Passage and Stats:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part1/1p277.html
http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/black_voices/voices_display.cfm?id=10
http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstatv.htm
http://web.cocc.edu/cagatucci/classes/hum211/CoursePack/diaspora.htm
http://www.neh.gov/news/humanities/2002-03/voices.html
It's a mixed bag, but all of the sources allude to the fact that many millions died after they were taken from their homes. Some say as many half of the deaths occurred before the slaves even left Africa.
Another piece is that our Arabic brothers and sisters were nearly as rapacious as Europeans and North and South Americans. The slave trade between Sub-Saharan Africa and Saharan and Mediterranean Africa was (and is) vigorous. How this cannot be viewed as genocide, according to the 1948 Geneva Conventions, I don't know.
And all of this remains extremely relevant today. During the Clinton Administration, Clinton officials debated over the official meaning of "genocide," in Rwanda in order to not have to face the prospect of sending US troops there. While they vacillated, as many as 800,000 people were slaughtered and Bill Clinton later went to the area to "apologize."
Today, there are a series of horrific slaughters raging throughout the region, especially in the Congo. As many as 5 million human beings have died in these slaughters and millions more have become refugees. One of the primary causes was the "blowback" from the Rwandan genocide of the 1990s.
In all of these cases the weapons are provided by the US and Europeans (both private and government interests) and paid for by the looting of African minerals.
Finally, while doing my quicky search, I was astounded at the number of sources that are proprietary and must be paid for; especially the detailed academic studies.
Thanks to Earthian for a much more well-sourced and thought out article.
I still stand by my general analysis.
Death and destruction is the "American Way", made possible by self-inflicted ignorance and hypocrisy.
I expect nothing less from the nation that insists that guns are good and cannabis is bad.
God-nonsense + guns = bullshit that kills.
The article and comments are superb.
But let's do our homework on a subject so important as genocide. There is a legal definition of genocide. It is in the 1948 Genocide Convention.
Just to be clear, here it is:
"Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."
http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/genocide/gendef.htm
Read carefully: "in whole or in part".
Genocide has a long history as the caring and thoughtful posts above indicate. The earliest precedent (of which I'm aware) for declaring genocide "legal" as official policy was by Pope Nicholas V in 1452. In the Papal Bulletin Dum Diversas, he stated that:
"We grant you [Kings of Spain and Portugal] by these present documents, with our Apostolic authority, full and free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens and pagans and any other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be, as well as their kingdoms, duchies, counties, principalities, and other property.and to reduce their persons into perpetual slavery."
Here is the source: (pages 20-26)
Davenport, Frances Gardiner, 19l7, European Treaties bearing on the History of the United States and its Dependencies to 1648, Vol. 1, Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
Thus the genocide of slavery began a new, hideous chapter of imperial horrors which began in about 5000 years ago in Babylon and Egypt.
Other genocides followed that which began in the mid-1400s in Africa, up to and including the present day American genocide in the Mideast from Gaza to Iraq.
There is a thorough article about the historical background by Steve Newcomb here:
http://ili.nativeweb.org/sdrm_art.html
The genocides of the Spanish, French, British and Portugese in the New World; that of enslaving African people; that of Turkey in Armenia; that committed by the Germans in Europe; that committed by the USA since WWII, that happening in Congo today, and many others—they are all horrific. We need not debate which is worse. It is more important to me that we realize the even bigger "cide" is in progress: ecocide, or the destruction of our only planet and the risk of hell-on-Earth, or nothing, for all future generations.
To bring about a progressive planet, via a progressive America and a true global community based on law and love and our common humanity is the work of our lives. Progressives have serious work to do and ALL is at stake.
Killing or enslaving ANYONE because of property/labor/race/religion is wrong!
Those that play 'My genocide is more important than yours" make me sick. They help the perptuation of this type of mass injustice.
BTW, I know of Eastern European Catholics found on rural Indiana roads after nightfall in the 20's by the KKK that were never seen again. All it takes is 1 person to be killed for all of humanity to suffer.
Ah, but race is no longer an issue in the USA. Obama proves it! Or so his supporters say...
"...they never intended to ruthlessly wipe out the entire group..."
Hmmmm....
Eugenics
Forced sterilizations
Drug saturated urban
not to mention what is being done to the people of the African continent
"...Still pales in comparison to Hitler at 12 million over 5 years and Stalin at 20 million plus..."
1 life is not as important as 100 or 1000 or 1,000,000. Where does one draw the line and who has the right do do the drawing?
I went to an exibit in DC based on the Nazi's extermination of Gays. We got spit on by Jews who screamed at us that we had no right to infringe on their holocaust.
WTF?
Hey TJ -
Please provide any reputable link for the figures you quote above. The consensus figure for the number of slaves brought to the Americas was about 10 million, with a death rate of about 20 percent. And this happend over a couple of centuries. Slavery was bad enough without you throwing a bunch of hyperbole at it. Still pales in comparion to Hitler at 12 million over 5 years and Stalin at 20 million plus.
Genocide really isn't the right word for what white America has done to black Americans. Though whites have killed the occasional black for sport or to cow the others and allowed many more to die from disease and poverty, they never intended to ruthlessly wipe out the entire group, which is what the Germans tried to do to Europe's Jews. Whites have always wanted black people around as menial labor. One can make a better case as to the Indians because whites wanted their land, not their labor. But I don't believe there were ten million Indians within the lower 48, let alone Doom n Gloom's one hundred million. Hunting/gathering and low-yield agriculture can only support so many. Even with smallpox, how could a few thousand Puritans and indentured servants have liquidated several million Indians? At best they could have set up a Mexico North, with a small white ruling class atop a mass of Indian peasants.
Manifest Karma
Timothy Gay wrote: We'll never know how many black lives perished in racial violence. A University of Illinois study suggests that, between 1882 and 1930, white mobs murdered a black man, woman or child somewhere in America nearly once a week, every week.
In America, the American Indian genocide resulted in the deaths of one hundred million people and is still ongoing. Jewish scholars and Jew's in general are openly hostile to recognition of the Indian genocide. Blacks in America too are openly hostile to recognizing the Indian genocide. Both are examples of cosmetic history for group benefit. The American Holocaust can no longer be suppressed. The time for open recognition has arrived.
http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=1096416517&na=872
I would like to add my voice to the chorus of those who have already pointed out that the real American Genocide that decimated the indigenous peoples of the America's and stole their land in the name of European expansionism, the glory of Empire and the assumed grace of the Christian God.
Europeans are the scourge of the world. Everything our ancestors touched has turned to shit, and we are left to wallow in it along with the straggling remnants of indigenous peoples around the globe.
In using the label America's Forgotten Genocide to describe the horrors of Slavery and Apartheid in the USA Mr. Gay has done a dis-service to the Native peoples and marginalized the worst Genocide ever committed.
The USA has always been genocidal in its policies; that's why I coined the term Death Party--the reality that genocidal policies have a continuity spanning US history and support from the major political parties existing during those times, and that those policies were expanded to the rest of the world in the attempt to expand US carrying capacity. Such a policy now risks the whole planet--BAU--but it's quite likely the far more massive inertia present in the planetary ecosystem will soon crush the much lesser inertia of BAU. The only real question that matters is How many billions will opt to die rather than revolt to maintain the luxuries of global elites, who number perhaps half a million?
To speak of genocide it is necessary to have a real example as a template or else the meaning will forever be innocuous. The only examples in recent recordable history where whole peoples were intentionally erradicated were (are) in what is now the U.S.A. and that genocide was carried out, and is still being carried out, by the U.S. government which has always had the intentional purpose of eliminating the Indigenous tribes. Read the seminal work "A LITTLE MATTER OF GENOCIDE" by Ward Churchill, ©1997, published by City Lights Books.
If any mass murder is referred to as "the Holocaust", without a primary reference to the past and ongoing genocide committed and being perpetrated by the U.S. against the Indigenous peoples of America, then that labeling for sympathy is a fraud.
Let's remember also that Christopher Columbus did the same thing to Native Americans: killing those who got too "uppity" and enslaving the rest.
2fedup:
Touche.
You are correct that the genocides directed against the original peoples of the Americas always should be mentioned in any discussion of genocide and the white supremacy efforts of European ruling classes and their American descendants. As should the truly genocidal behaviors against Asian and Pacific peoples, some of which were more or less "effective."
The commonality in all of this is the notion of white supremacy or racism: that idea that any individual or groups of people is better than any others as a matter of birth/genetics/nationality/culture.
I will become much less disgusted about hearing about the Jewish Holocaust and slavery at every turn when our own genocide right here on American soil is spoken about with the same regard. The genocide of our native peoples, the American Indian, is the most overlooked, most disgracefully unspoken about, falsified disgusting event in our history. They had entire nations, entire civilizations, erradicated, gone forever, erased, by us, and it's never spoken about. The Native Americans have never been considered for an apology of any sort. We wiped them out, Americans, not Germany, not village elders selling off their own people, our direct ancestors did this, and no one speaks of it, I'm ashamed. And I can hear it already, they have casinos. Big deal.
jmacneil:
Please consider this:
During the horrific centuries of the Middle Passage of stealing Africans from their native continent to feed the Western Hemisphere slave machine, between 10 and 20 MILLION human beings died before arrival in the Americas.
Of those who survived, many more uncounted millions and their descendants were murdered outright by various means, millions of others were worked to death, and millions more died from (often untreated) diseases. Trillions of dollars worth of labor and property were looted.
Post-Reconstruction, the US fell into an apartheid era that we call segregation or Jim Crow. It is described above. Not only were people murdered outright, but they were forced into urban ghettos (which remain until this day) or imprisoned in concentration-camp type facilities that we call the "criminal justice system." The criminal part is certainly correct.
If you compare these numbers to the European/US Holocaust against European Jewry, you will find that they far outstrip that horror, which is rightly called a "genocide."
Though total annihilation did not succeed, the subjugation of an entire people (Americans of African origins) has been wildly successful, though it long ago cost all of the the Americas our soul and has very much led to the imerial downfall that the US is now experiencing.
White supremacy, or any other kind, is suicidal in the end.
Have a nice day.
America has no trouble with forgetting a genocide here or there. Just ask an native American Indian or a descendant of a 'buffalo soldier'. They also have no trouble with inventing genocides or promoting their favorite ones. The Holocaust has to be the best selling genocide of all time.
Hoa binh
There was an article about four years ago in the Eugene Register-Guard discussing the participation of Eugene Oregon's civic leaders in the Ku Klux Klan, including marching down the main street in white sheets and burning a cross on Skinner Butte to warn Blacks not to get off the train in Eugene. The reporter writing the story referred to these activities as "flirting" with the Klan. I wrote a furious letter and ended it saying: I don't believe that this reporter thinks of himself as a racist, but his writing does perpetuate racist attitudes by minimizing and sanitizing Klan behaviors. Black people do not look on Klan history with the fond indulgence implied in his article. Their recollections are of horror, terror and tragedy.
I talk with many people, and white people just don't get it. We have traumatized an entire race, both during our enslavement of them and afterwards. And neither race has recovered from that experience.
One thing that seriously attracts me to Obama, even if Edwards is more progressive, is that I feel strongly he could be a healing influence on our racial wounds, which deeply affect our society. I believe it will take a Black man to heal us, but American Blacks, as are American whites, are wounded. I realize many whites are unaware of their wounds, but they act them out unconsciously. Obama's father is not an American, not wounded. Obama grew up in Hawaii, where people of various colors are the majority, and the culture is racially tolerant. A good start. We have many critical issues that urgently need our attention, but perhaps unifying our nation is the place to start.
kathyodat
I live in the south, and have taught my children about the injustices of the Jim Crow laws, and how it must have felt to be subject to them. My Great-grandmother was a quaker and help support the anti-lynching legislation that finally help stem the violence. A bad chapter in our history, one that needs to be remembered.
The U.S.'s despicable behavior against blacks wasn't (isn't) genocide. It was, and is, cultural domination. The U.S.'s condemnable behavior against the Indigenous population was (is) genocide. The two examples aren't even remotely similar so sensationalizing the one at the expense of the other is decidedly unprofessional. And a one-time depiction of a noose on the cover of a limited production periodical in no way compares to having baseball teams exhibit their racial intolerance in every aspect of their organization.