Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Biofuels a Lose-Lose Strategy, Critics Say
BROOKLIN - U.S. biofuels production is driving up food prices around the world, giving billions of poor people a very good reason to hate U.S. policy, say environmentalists.
"The U.S. has led the fight to stem global hunger, now we are creating hunger," said Lester Brown, president of the Earth Policy Institute, an environmental think tank in Washington.
The booming U.S. ethanol industry is diverting enormous amounts food into fuel: 81 million tonnes of grain in 2007 and 114 million tonnes this year, equaling 28 percent of the entire U.S. grain harvest, Brown told IPS.
Previous eras of high grain prices were mainly the result of bad weather, but these price hikes are the result of government policy, he said.
"Grain prices are at record or near-record highs and they will go higher," he said. "We might be the first society in history to use public tax dollars to drive up its own food prices."
U.S. government subsidies for ethanol and biodiesel will be 13 billion dollars this year and will approach 100 billion dollars for the 2006-2012 period, according to a report released last October by the International Institute for Sustainable Development's Global Subsidies Initiative based in Geneva, Switzerland.
These subsidies translate into roughly 1.40 dollars to 1.70 dollars per gallon of gasoline equivalent and 2.00 dollars to 2.35 dollars per gallon of diesel equivalent. And the way current legislation is written, U.S. taxpayers will continue to subsidise every gallon of biofuel for decades to come, the report found.
On Dec. 19, President George W. Bush signed into law the Energy Independence and Security Act 2007, which mandates the use of 36 billion gallons of agrofuels per year by 2022 -- a five-fold increase over present levels.
"We pay billions to support the ethanol industry and then we pay again at the supermarket for higher-priced foods," said Brown.
This lose-lose biofuel strategy doesn't even offer any genuine environmental benefits, he added, since growing corn and making ethanol uses lots of fuel, fertiliser, pesticides and water, and degrades the soil.
Turning food into biofuel pits the car owners of the world against the two billion poor who struggle to get enough to eat, he said. The results of this unequal competition will be even worse than a 2007 University of Minnesota study that reported the 850 million people currently suffering from hunger and malnutrition will rise to at least 1.2 billion by 2025 because of competition for land and water from biofuels.
As wheat, corn, and soybean prices climb, prices of the food products made directly from these commodities such as bread, pasta and tortillas, and those made indirectly, such as pork, poultry, beef, milk, and eggs, are everywhere on the rise. In Mexico, corn meal prices are up 60 percent. In Pakistan, flour prices have doubled. China is facing rampant food price inflation.
Social unrest over food prices has already started, creating instability in weaker countries, and it will only get worse, Brown predicted.
"Agrofuels (biofuels) are driving us up an inflationary food price spiral," agreed Eric Holt-Gimenez of the Institute for Food and Development Policy/Food First, an NGO in Oakland, California.
High oil prices are pushing up the price of ethanol so farmers and agribusiness scramble to plant more and more land to grow crops for fuel. And with less land for food crops, food prices will continue to rise, so that some will switch from ethanol to food. That will ratchet up the price of ethanol and prices will spiral ever upwards, Holt-Gimenez told IPS.
"Food retailers, grain companies, seed and fertiliser corporations, and the oil industry will be laughing all the way to the bank," he said.
A coalition of U.S organisations have called for an immediate moratorium on U.S. incentives for agrofuels, U.S. agro-energy monocultures and global trade in agrofuels. The U.S. is still the world's biggest grain exporter, but could not grow enough corn to produce 36 billion gallons of ethanol, so a significant portion will have to be imported, likely from Southeast Asia and Latin America, Holt-Gimenez said.
The rush to supply agrofuels to Europe and elsewhere is pushing people off their land in the global south. In Southeast Asia, poor people can't even find palm oil to cook with because it is being turned into biodiesel for northern countries, he said.
Many environmental groups in the North initially supported biofuels as a way to help small farmers in the South and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but failed to see what might happen when large corporate and financial interests became involved. "Now biofuels are completely transforming the world's food and fuel system and it has become a major issue in many countries," he said.
In the past year, numerous scientific, economic and social studies have offered evidence that biofuels are a huge mistake. Even the future second-generation cellulosic biofuel will compete with food by using land, water and reducing soil fertility. While Europe had re- examined its commitment to biofuels, on Jan. 23 it affirmed its target that 10 percent of all fuels for transport be biofuels by 2020.
"There is tremendous corporate power behind the agrofuel industry," Holt-Gimenez concluded.
Lester Brown, an agricultural economist for many years, says it's too late for debate. An immediate halt on all ethanol plants under construction is needed, otherwise social and economic turmoil lie ahead.
"Biofuels will be seen as one of the great tragedies in history," Brown said.
© 2008 Inter Press Service
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


17 Comments so far
Show AllBurning any carbon based fuel, whether it's source is on top of or beneath the ground, adds CO2 to the atmosphere,
this fuel for cars will compete with our future government-alloted corn/soy mush with prozac. by then, human-fueled military machines will put us in the ultimate death spiral. evil homer-machines? howmmph! howmmph! howmmph! howmph! i guess will bypass soilant green. brave new................................
Why don't we just do as the Brazilians have been doing for
at least 20 yrs i.e. using road side grasses to make bio-fuel
Brazil instituted the Accelerated Growth Plan in 2007. Sugar cane plantations with slave labor and near slave labor are the order of the day. The indigenous peoples and rural landless suffer most. Its not a model.
There are much better ways to cut carbon-based emissions, all of which can be applied locally.
e.g.
Low-grade energy ...
http://www.dlsc.ca/
High-grade energy ...
http://www.sandia.gov/news/resources/releases/2004/renew-energy-batt/Stirling.html
Also, left-over bits from food crops can be used as fuel for electicity generation to charge your electric car's batteries.
What a tragedy for the world. All for greed and profit. And who is behind all this? ADM, Monsanto, Cargill, et al. Just business as usual for these monsters. One thing that this article did not address is the whole GM corn issue. ALL corn grown for ethanol is Monsanto GM. More pollution of the food supply that will remain. It's all bad........
The most efficient biofuel from a land use stand point seems to be from algae which can be grown on an industrial scale using waste output products (agricultural waste from Hog, cattle, poultry farms---even human waste, thus ameliorating problems on two fronts at the same time) and not taking a significant amount of food production land to do so. Rather than use more energy in manufacturing than they produce, these biodiesel fuels will yield several times the net input. Net cost of production is less than half present pump prices for petro deisel. However, it seems that the policy makers in this country have again made decisions on the welfare of their paying supporters rather than on the welfare of the country and the world.--- ADM and Cargill are proud---- BTW --- this technology was developed at taxpayer expense in the 1990's.
Hi all,
I get a scientific newsletter that reports all kinds of great research being done, new finds in science and medicine...The Kurzweil Newsletter. In regards to biofuel, see this article:
http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/20056/
Bless the energetic and educated souls who are trying to save our asses!
PAX Marianne
mas1946: Thanks for the article. Very interesting.
I hope that this stupid program doesn't prevent work on converting waste streams into fuel. Human sewage, crop residue, industrial byproducts diverted from more damaging disposal could be better converted to fuel. I understand liposuction removed fat makes a fine fuel.
"If there is not enough bread then let them eat cake". No need to lose our heads over this...is there?
Another Big Lie; another Super Con!
Hi folks
I agree with the article but for other reasons.
We're already in the 6th Mass Extinction, at a rate never seen before in the geological records, some say over 570 species a day....
In rural areas, remnants of bio-diversity hang on, in all that marginal land, so DON'T TOUCH IT! Don't use it for bio-fuels!
Also, all that harvested remaining biomass on arable land, needs to be left there as organic fertilizer for the land, NOT taken off for bio-fuel!
Check out http://www.well.com/user/davidu/extinction.html
then go to http://www.well.com/user/davidu/greenfestival.html
and listen to the audio....
Wake up. Civilisation as we know it is collapsing. Bio-fuels is an insane way to prolong business-as-usual, while ignoring the damage created by doing this.
Symptoms of peak everything, climate change, mass extinction, rampant militarism and corrupted political processes all all to the underlying problem : cultural crisis.
So either stop, and power-down, start protecting your landbase as if your lives depend on it (as they surely will!)...or join the die-off.
Regards
Ted
Nelson, NZ
Interesting to notice that the Brazilian sugar cane method could easily be accomplished in Cuba. Are the oil barons mixed up in the antipathy for Cuba we've been fed for so long?
TED HOWARD
thank you for the links. i've saved them and will read the articles and listen to the audio. (i have quite a collection of 'saved' articles now from other c.d. posters....) i briefly read one of the 6th mass extinction articles and remember hearing years ago that every day a phenomenal amount of species became extinct. i was skeptical at the time of the number, but having read this article i now believe it to be true. and that yes, perhaps 'intelligence' will eventually kill us off. whatever the reason, i agree that we are experiencing a 'cultural crisis'. and i hate it when people say that these 'incidents' have always been around - it's because we have more access to communications that we get to know about them..........
I was just wondering what folk think of waste vegetable oils and if they have any useful info about them. I feel pretty mixed about biofuels in general. I do feel what is more important to address is our out of control consumption, whether it's fuel or consumer goods or whatever. But i do believe that biofuels may play a positive role in curbing our addiction to fossil fuels, if used with discretion. It's wonderful that this is being talked about this way instead of praising biofuels as the panacea that will save us all, critical thought, discussion and action is so crucial now. A website i looked into after reading this article is AlternativeEnergyCoalition.org
Small and local is seeming to look more promising in every way, but let's keep talking and not close our minds.
only HEMP
and see Mr Douglas's pod cast on NPR Marketplace Monday 1-28-08 in Sonora Mex
www.earthpeoplefoundation.org for hemp info