EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Religious Leaders Assail Bush Agenda
NEW YORK - Describing George W. Bush as "an explicitly evangelical president" with a "sadly truncated" moral vision, a group of religious leaders is calling on the U.S. president to use his State of the Union message to Congress Monday evening to salvage his legacy by "changing course on the most pressing moral issues of our time".
In a telephone news conference Thursday, Protestant evangelical and Roman Catholic leaders challenged the president to use his speech to announce major changes in his administration's policies on war, torture, climate change, and U.S. and international poverty. The teleconference was held under the aegis of Faith in Public Life, a not-for-profit resource centre for the faith community
The group credited Bush for some of his efforts, including his programmes to address the HIV/AIDS pandemic in Africa, increasing foreign aid, and his domestic Faith-based Initiative. But it was highly critical of many other Bush administration policies, particularly the war in Iraq, providing insufficient resources to help millions of Iraqi refugees, seeming indifference to growing poverty in the U.S., the use of torture, and failure to take a leadership position on global climate change.
The group was particularly critical of the president and his team regarding the use of torture as a tool in the war on terrorism. Rev. David Gushee, president of Evangelicals for Human Rights, said, "In his well-intentioned efforts to protect national security, President Bush and his team over-reached by authorising and employing torture that certainly qualifies as and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment."
Noting that "these decisions were made in secret" following the Sep. 11, 2001 attacks on the U.S., Gushee said that once abuses such as the Abu Ghraib prison scandal were revealed, the courts, the media and public opinion forced Bush into "a kind of tactical retreat." But, he added, Bush "still reserves the right to authorise the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to employ a range of secret 'enhanced interrogation' techniques, including waterboarding."
He criticised the president for threatening to veto pending legislation that would make these practices illegal, and urged him to abandon his objections to using the Army Field Manual as the standard for all interrogations, including those carried out by the CIA.
"It is hard to overstate the devastating effect of this policy on the moral standing of the U.S.," said Gushee, who is the author of the anti-torture statement recently endorsed by the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE), which claims a membership of about 4.5 million people.
Sister Anne Curtis of the Institute of the Sisters of Mercy, who recently returned from Iraq, focused on the plight of the estimated four million Iraqis who have either fled to neighbouring countries or been internally displaced by the war. She said U.S. efforts to assist these refugees -- many of whom have become targets for insurgents because they worked for U.S. authorities -- are under-funded and under-resourced.
Talking with refugee families, she said, "I felt a great sense of shame and deep sorrow as a citizen of the U.S.," she told reporters. "President Bush needs to understand the reality" of the refugee situation. He has "a responsibility, a moral obligation, to end the war in Iraq, aid the refugee applicants, and provide for the necessary funding of refugee assistance," she said.
Asked whether any of the contenders for their respective presidential nominations would feel comfortable endorsing the ideas expressed by the group, the speakers declined to name any particular candidate. "The evangelical world has been hurt by its identification with President Bush's immoral choices," said Dr. Ron Sider, president of Evangelicals for Social Action.
But in response to a question from IPS regarding former Gov. Mike Huckabee's proposal to amend the U.S. Constitution to bring it more in line with Biblical scripture, Sider said, "I would not state it that way. This is not a Christian nation. We should not talk about making the Constitution in line with any religious text." Rather, he said it is appropriate to "talk about moral norms and how people understand these norms," adding that he favours an amendment to the Constitution to ban same-sex marriage.
Poverty in the U.S. was high on the group's agenda. Father Larry Snyder, president of Catholic Charities USA, noted that in 2002 his organisation provided 43 percent of its services to the working poor; by 2006, the number had risen to 52 percent.
"More than 36 million people living in poverty in the U.S., which is simply unacceptable. It is a moral and social crisis, because as a country we have the knowledge and the resources to significantly reduce this number," he said. He criticised Congress as well as the president for failing to pass legislation to address the long-term health care needs of poor children.
Global warming was another major concern for the group. Rev. Dr. Paul de Vries, an NAE board member and an original signer of an "Evangelical Climate Initiative" statement, urged Bush to use his Monday night speech to lay out his commitment to "take care of God's creation." He should "praise the scientists, praise the Congress, and lay out a programme to set an example for the rest of the world."
In 2006, the NAE declined to take a stance on global warming, and released a letter stating that "global warming is not a consensus issue". Twenty evangelical leaders, such as James Dobson and Charles Colson, were signatories. But a year later, the 86 NAE members joined a group of prominent scientists in a statement demanding "urgent changes in values, lifestyles and public policies to avert disastrous changes in climate."
The statement cautioned that "millions of people could die in this century because of climate change, most of them our poorest global neighbours."
The group also expressed concern about the current economic downturn triggered by the sub-prime mortgage market meltdown. Rev. de Vries called attention to "the extraordinary levels of deceit" by banks and mortgage companies, and charged that "no one seems to have the guts to say so and conduct a thorough investigation."
He added, "The bank robbers have taken over the banks."
On achieving a peace deal between Israel and the Palestinians, Rev. Sider said President Bush could have a "huge impact" on current negotiations. "But this is not going to happen unless he invests himself and his credibility" in the effort.
© 2008 Inter Press Service
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

30 Comments so far
Show AllIf the Pope wanted to stop the war all he had to do was take an extended visit to Iraq in March 2003.
American religious groups have been carefully trained to believe what they are told, to do what they are told and to never ask questions. That's why they vote Fascist and will never awaken to the stench of their self made sulphur.
Among the things they CREDITED Bush for was :his domestic Faith-based Initiative" ...
and that's $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ in their pockets.
Let's see how long this criticism continues.
True, "The bank robbers have taken over the banks."
and that also began more than 45 years ago.
There was only one way to destroy the New Deal and that was with political violence which we have suffered over the past 45 years.
And with electonic voting machines introduced in the mid-1960's allowing election steals.
Corporate money has bought our politicians and pretty much runs our government now.
Is this the way we want things to go?
I'm glad the liberal religous folks are moving on this ---
where have they been?
Did they not notice increasing poverty?
Torture?
Here in the UK, the Archbishop of Canterbury has been consistent with his condemnation of the Iraq war and foreign policy, to the extent that politicians and the press have criticised him for speaking outside of his remit, ie. church matters,
I wish he would carry on with the criticism, and shout it from the pulpit.
I am, as a matter of interest, a very lapsed Catholic.
"talk about moral norms and how people understand these norms," adding that he favours an amendment to the Constitution to ban same-sex marriage."
though they DO still have their heads rammed up their arses.
include an amendment to our constitution to remove rights from a group of citizens?
while we're at it, let's take away the right to vote from "values" voters. the religionists have been getting wrong since the beginning.
The Evangilical "Christians" and other religious groups, who had a great deal to do with Bush being in the white House, should follow the infamous Jim Jones example and be lifted out of here. __ Ignorant idiots.
Don't drink the Republican Koolaid ! Now that Bush's soul has been exposed as religiously dark we will see him once again nakedly enriching the darkness. Be sure to watch is State of Darkness Speech and the cloaked seething evil he attempts to hide in it's delivery. Smell the sulphur !!!
That photo says it all. That's about the two ugliest individuals ever to grace this, or any other, website.
They did say 'credited', right. Keeping the balance book so's Georgie can be stood in the right line come rapture-time. Betcha Saint Peter can tell he's got a forked tongue. We, on the other hand, seem to be blissfully unaware of the fibbing, murder, fraud, and, theft right before our eyes.
Bush only listens to his god, not real people. He doesn't care. He ain't gonna listen to these guys anymore than he listens to the American people.
I have shown my disgust for religious evangelicals who voted for Bush and this war of choice; but I must say this article is POSITIVE as it shows at least some awakening of genuine caring (a tenet of true spirituality) in some religious leaders and their flock(s) numbering into the millions. This is GOOD news! Amen! About time! Don't forget, this was one enormous voting bloc that the Republicans/Bush neo-cons counted on. Perhaps it will begin to rupture and move towards better candidates, Edwards probably our best choice now.
John Paul II spoake against the war befor it happened - but I'll be damned if I heard any American RC Bishops seconding the opinion.
Heh - that's a good point!
The easiest marks to cheat, dupe, and swindle in large numbers, are those that follow a devout life. This feat seems easier to accomplish now than in the recent past.
VALIENT LEADERSHIP,
Our faith in Bush's leadership and Devine guidance has been reinforced by his decisive action to protect us from such dangerous and important issues as gay marriage and flag burning. Our legislators may now dwell on these paramount issues rather waste their efforts on lessor items such as the war, homeland security, which he has so aptly demonstrated can be best pursued by his team without congressional or outside interference-- and especially global warming which we now know is a conspiracy developed by the international scientific community.
For our safety, criticism of this administration cannot be tolerated, andmerits reprimand. This is why Bush had to expose Senator Max Cleland, a triple amputee Vietnam veteran, as unpatriotic-for supporting the dangerous inquiry into 9/11, as well as others who have challenged his policies
THEOCRACY, POLITICS & EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH
Still not satisfied with robbing hope from thousands with incurable diseases, and then impeding California's voters efforts to pursue it, Bush now abuses his veto power to block this promising cure.
His alleged concern for the unborn is rendered void by the unmeasurable deaths and illnesses resulting from his blockage of vital environmental, conservation and health reforms--either with secrecy, or disguising them as environmental friendly based irrational logic and manipulated science used to a degree never before experienced in our history.
With similar irrationality, he has compounded this destruction by undermining family planning and women's rights in impoverished areas--the only real means of ending world starvation and poverty for this and future generations, including the unborn.
In order to pacify his radical supporters, satisfy his own theocratic ego, and create diversions from real problems; he justifies his actions using the same misinformation and manipulated science to invalidate support from the medical profession and the public for this research. His shameless repeat theatrics with the "snowflake children" to forge his assertion--that using some of the thousands of otherwise discarded embryos is murder-- underscores his mentality and mendacity.
By allowing such outrages from this unlearned and dangerous president, guided by his financial and radical religious right supporters who planted him in office; Americans have only themselves to blame for not only the resulting medical setbacks, but also expanded world poverty, sickness, and degradation of our planet.
I think we need to read this cautiously. Some of these religious folks are the same who brought you Intelligent Design, the same who argue for a 6,000 year old planet, who reject large branches of science and reason, etc.
Maybe these folks are best kept in a (losing) Republican Party in '08?
Thankyou Paul Bramscher, and you also Robert Settgast. Are we now to believe these foolish people, these throwbacks to the ideology of medieval times, these illogical,ill-informed, Christian propagandized & dogmatized worshipers & slaves to one book of millions, are to achieve salvation, when it was THEIR misguided behavior that ensconced the worst dictator since Hitler in the Whitehouse for these last 7+ miserable democracy rending years?
Although I agree somewhat with you, Siouxrose, this could be a positive sign, I'm also not quite as forgiving as you, and suspect of the motives of these 4.5 million who have finally "seen the light" about Bush's inadequacies & ill intent. Are they being opportunistic in trying to progress their anti-social agenda any way they can;I believe so. Did BushCo use & dupe them; no doubt.
Where was their common sense when we were screaming loudly "You're going the wrong way morally"...deaf to our pleas. Now that 65% of Americans are against Bush & his policies do they see their financial support eroded if they continue to support him, unquestionably. I would like to be magnanimous enough to believe their sincerity, then again I would still like to be naive enough to believe in Santa.
If you lie in bed with snakes you wake up with snakes, and unquestionably get bitten. Sorry, Souixrose, but until they are willing to offer more than just easily spoken words & intentions, I remain a skeptic great things will come of such an association.
Now if they reject the funding for these 'faith based initiatives', support taxation of ALL churches, vehemently oppose the melding of church & state, eschew voting for corporate controlled candidates, demand paper trail ballots, drop pushing the issues of abortion, same-sex marriage, and stem cell funding (which are just 'fluff' BS ones in a serious political debate regarding good governance anyway), then perhaps I will believe their intentions are honorable & legitimate. The ball is now in their court and it's time to really 'put up' or sit down and just be quiet.
A huge number of Christians don't support Bush and never have, including so-called "evangelicals." Many have worked tirelessly both in the big and small picture for change. When Clinton #1 re-elected and Bush was elected I was living in inner-city LA volunteering with kids who were gang members or at risk. (I would have voted for Clinton, but the (Democrat) running the voter registration drive didn't mail in my form.) I've never voted for Bush. Since that time, I have stopped participating in institutional religious Christianity (as part of a quiet, vast movement of others doing likewise). I read the Bible and have very real faith, although I don't use it to dispute science (I take the literal parts literally and the figurative parts figuratively). The Bible informs my desire for genuine social justice, which is more than top down, ineffective aid bureaucracies. I want to be involved myself working toward social justice, and I am.
For the record, right now I'm on the edge of my seat hoping for the opportunity to vote for Obama in the general election.
I understand that people claiming Christian religion have popularized a form of Christianity that is just plain wrong (I won't bothering listing in what ways), and I am likewise offended and angry. I could also list horrible offenses by so-called liberals or progressives over the years, but why go there.
I'll conclude by saying that those who would deprive people with whom they disagree (however correctly) of the right to vote (or live) don't deserve to call themselves "liberal" or "progressive" and are the last ones who should be tossing the "fascist" label around. There are many, many Christians on your side, and we just might make good partners together. Let's get beyond writing comments, though, and perhaps make a stand together where it counts in the real world.
These religious groups drank the cool aid a long time ago and now with Bush having less than a year to go they want to distance themselves from both their and Bush's actions. Gimme a break.
Lobo Gris
"The evangelical world has been hurt by its identification with President Bush's immoral choices," said Dr. Ron Sider, president of Evangelicals for Social Action.
As it should be. The hypocrisy of Christians is laid bare for all to see and now the high priests are experiencing an appropriate dose of conspirator's remorse. You religious crackpots filled up the offering plate every Sunday with absolutely no verifiable idea where that money actually went. Faith Based initiatives? Eight Billion dollars? Since there's no tax returns filed, no proof that it went to anybody different than where an old man in a robe told you it was going to, it's very likely it went to Pakistan to fund the insurgents to keep the Bush/Rothschild crime families flush with war business for decades.
"Missionaries in the Middle East?" you say? Receipts please. If they were there, they would have had to use their Visas somewhere. If they were there, to the tune of Eight billion dollars, there had to be thousands of them getting on airplanes to go over there. Airline records please?
I motion we tax all Christian churches in the U.S. and audit them routinely since they have violated the tax laws about not trying to politically influence American policy with their donations.
Secondly, do us all a big favor, Listen to KEM above and chug some Jim Jones Kool-Aid, and keep your crazy superstitions out of my government like the founding fathers demanded.
a seperation of church and state was not a myth like Pat Robinson the insane tells you.
Famous Quotes Regarding Freedom Of Religion:
"The United States is in no sense founded upon the Christian doctrine." George Washington
"As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion ..." from the Treaty of Tripoli, signed by John Adams, June 10, 1797.
"Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God; that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship; that the legislative powers of the government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should `make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between church and State. Thomas Jefferson, in his historic Danbury letter, January 1, 1802
"Who does not see that the same authority which can establish Christianity, in exclusion of all other Religions, may establish with the same ease any particular sect of Christians, in exclusion of all other Sects?" James Madison, in "Memorial and Remonstrance", 1785
"The number, the industry, and the morality of the priesthood, and the devotion of the people have been manifestly increased by the total separation of church and state." James Madison, March 2, 1819
"Neither a state nor the Federal Government can, openly or secretly, participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups and vice versa. In the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect 'a wall of separation between Church and State." The U.S. Supreme Court, 1947
"I am against judicial reforms driven by nakedly partisan reasoning. ... We must be ever-vigilant against those who would strong-arm the judiciary into adopting their preferred policies. It takes a lot of degeneration before a country falls into dictatorship, but we should avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings."
- Recently retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor -- a Republican, conservative-leaning Reagan appointee who helped deliver the White House to the Bush Syndicate in 2000 -- seems to have developed a serious case of conspirator's remorse.
AND NOW WE HEAR FROM THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT:
"They have kept us in submission because they have talked about separation of church and state. There is no such thing in the Constitution. It's a lie of the left, and we're not going to take it anymore." Pat Robertson, addressing the ACLJ, 1993
"The national government ... will maintain and defend the foundations on which the power of our nation rests. It will offer strong protection to Christianity as the very basis of our collective morality." Adolf Hitler, 1938
pac "fair and balanced" plyer
I think the groups mentioned most prominently in the article were opposed to Bush from the beginning and have been working for change in the trenches (and in public statements) all along. Keep in mind that these groups, just like any others, are only deemed to "have spoken" when it's reported in the media. If they are ever silent, it's because they are working and don't have time for politics. The evangelical right, defined by people like Pat Robertson and James Dobson, have been Bush's main base of support among Christians and have often been "annointed" by the media as the voice of Christianity. They have never spoken for me, and there are many, many others who would say the same strongly.
Ron Sider, quoted in the article, has certainly been on the correct side of these issues for decades.
Lumping all Christians together (as in many of the comments above) is no more accurate than lumping all liberals together. As an organized religion, Christianity has tended historically to be a conservative force (as religions usually are). I would argue that even liberal Christianity as a religion has historically urged reform that ultimately reinforces the status quo (just like the Democratic Party reinforces the status quo). Religions and political parties are invested in keeping things generally unchanged. But as people who read the Bible and follow Jesus, countless Christians have given their lives for the love of justice and and in hope of genuine change, often alongside activists and people of other faiths.
Peace, out.
"The bank robbers have taken over the banks."
That's not all they've taken over:
http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/engdahl/2008/0123.html
It would be nice to see the christians split from the capitalists and join the progressives. The christians could de-emphasize the church hierarchy and emphasize instead the moral teachings. Can christians give up hierarchy? That would remove the one idea they share in common with the capitalists.
rtdrury,
Mainstream Christianity has not been a subversive/progressive movement in the West since before Constantine. The key problem with all mythologies/religions, especially the patriarchal/monotheistic Abrahamic variety, is that they are compelled bootrap something invisible around basic human compassion and respect for nature.
And this rejection of empiricism and reason opens the door to psychosis (at worst) upwards to hallucination, delusion, denial, apology (at best).
I've yet to meet a religious person whose core tenet is secular humanism and defense of the earth, with religion only as an optional topping to this.
Interesting article and comments on it. Personally, I'm sick of the word "Christianity" and "Christian this and Christian that. We can all see the con game by religious charlatans and the flock of naive believers who think they're holier than thou, who, for the most part, fear the unknown waters of independent thinking. Coupled with a gross misrepresentation of and no understanding of the message their Saviour spoke of. Church and religion is 'big-business' and has very little to do with an indivividual's personal development of the soul or character development or whatever you'd like to call it, but it has everything to do with control, money, and a voting block of 'Kool-Aid' drinkers. As I've said many times, Whatever religion doesn't teach and practice 'The Golden Rule', is mumbo jumbo and sacrilegious to real teachers or instructors of sacred teachings. If these 'evangelicals' or other Protestant and Catholic Christians really believed in the teachings of the 'Messiah' we would not have the tragic bloodthirsty debacle in Iraq or Afghanistan ( among other places ) all in the name of 'GOD'. It's 2008 AD and many Americans act like they were from 2008 BC .
Ignorance is not bliss, because when the vast majority let a small minority do the thinking for them, tyrants take over. When somebody tells me they are a Christian, I start running in the opposite direction.
Chris Hedges has written much on the subject of religion, fear, and fascism.
While I'm at it, the propaganda machine is triumphant again as the S.C. primary showed. It's down to Obama and Clinton, and if any of you read the Kucinich articles a few days ago, I commented on a bet made with a friend last year on the Dem. candidates.
May all people renounce jingoism, willful ignorance, violence, apathy, and false teachers.
"Rev. David Gushee, president of Evangelicals for Human Rights, said, 'In his well-intentioned efforts to protect national security,'..."
This president does not have any "well intentions" to protect national security or to protect human rights or to give a crap about anything that might matter to you or me.
This president's efforts lead directly to things like helpless families and little children being blown to pieces, and this president's friends in the perverted war-profit game getting very wealthy.
Why don't the "religious leaders" in this country take to the streets like the "spiritual leaders" in Myanmar (Burma) did a while back? If "The Church" were the slightest bit interested in an ethical government, they would be preaching about it to their subjects or members or whatever you call the people who go to church and listen to preachers.
PEACEMAN
i like chris hedges too. and i agree with your statement that people are living/acting like they are in b.c.2008. but then religion was invented by man to keep the 'masses' down. they've certainly accomplished that......wonder what earth would have been like if it hadn't been thrust upon us............i'm in love with kpfa by the way. thank you for introducing me to it............
coco