Email List
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Pakistan Bans International Observers From Conducting Exit Polls for Election
WASHINGTON - Despite assurances to the Bush administration that it will allow unrestricted international monitoring of crucial Feb. 18 elections, Pakistan is refusing to permit observers to conduct exit polls, an important method of detecting fraud.
The United States and other powers see a fair vote in Pakistan as a chance to stabilize the country, which has been under eight years of army rule and is racked by an al Qaida-backed Islamic insurgency, ethnic tensions and a political crisis fueled by the Dec. 27 assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto.
"The elections need to be free and fair, and be seen as free and fair," State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said after Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice met with Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf on Thursday in Davos, Switzerland.
Privately, Pakistani officials have assured the Bush administration that U.S. and European Union monitoring teams will have free access to election sites and won't be subject to the extensive restrictions that Pakistani election officials outlined last month, U.S. officials said.
But Pakistan is refusing to reconsider a regulation that bars monitors from conducting exit polls, said Lorne W. Craner, the president of the International Republican Institute, a U.S. democracy promotion group that planned to send dozens of election monitors to Pakistan.
"It's very unusual not to be able to do an exit poll," said Craner, explaining that such surveys provide an independent means of verifying official election results.
"An exit poll or a parallel vote tabulation is an extra assurance of the legitimacy of the election," he said.
A potentially bigger issue is whether the IRI will even organize monitoring in light of the risks to Americans in Pakistan. Americans have been the frequent targets of attacks by Islamic insurgents allied with al Qaida and Taliban extremists from Afghanistan, and Craner said the IRI has a "very big" concern with security.
Moreover, Pakistani officials have warned that insurgent groups, which have been infiltrating the country's heartland from remote tribal areas bordering Afghanistan, could disrupt the elections with attacks on polling stations and security forces.
The ban on exit polling is likely to fuel fears of fraud, which also are bolstered by questions about the legitimacy of voter lists and Musharraf's decision that disputes be resolved by the federal election commission instead of by the courts. The commission is widely seen as being packed with Musharraf's cronies.
Bhutto's Pakistan Peoples Party and other opposition groups say they're convinced the government will rig the polls in favor of Musharraf's political allies, although he stepped down as army chief in December.
Musharraf, hailed by President Bush as a close U.S. ally in fighting terrorism, is despised in Pakistan for making constitutional changes that are widely deemed illegal and for purging independent judges to preserve his power.
Ending a European tour aimed at reassuring the international community of his commitment to restoring democracy, Musharraf said Friday that "the elections will be free, fair, transparent and peaceful."
"Any bugs in the system that could be manipulated have been removed by me and the election officials," he asserted in a speech to a defense institute in London.
In fact, Pakistan has lifted some of the restrictions it had imposed when the elections were to be held on Jan. 8. They included notifying Pakistani authorities in advance of the polling stations and ballot-counting centers that the monitors planned to visit.
Pakistani officials have told their American counterparts that the observers "can go unannounced to any polling site," said an administration official, who asked not to be further identified because of the sensitivity of the issue.
© McClatchy Newspapers 2008
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



8 Comments so far
Show AllPersonally I think its weird to begin with Americans send election observers overseas. Other people's elections are really none of our business and we should not be messing with them. We can't get elections correct in our own country. That being said we shouldn't be supporting the Musharaff dictatorship either.
Why'd they do that? The Pakistani military could just hire the same corporate media firm that does the exit polls over here. They've got long experience in making the exit polls get close enough to the rigged election results to make it look semi-legit. Been working for both Dems and Rethugs over here for a long time. Just hire them and then brag about the democracy that re-elects your general.
Isn't the whole concept of asking Americans to monitor an election about the equivalent of asking gangsters to guard your bank vault?
Hell, ruling out independent monitoring for elections would be more or less aking to refusing UN monitors in the trial of Jose Padilla. It says loud and clear:-
We know we are going to cheat, and we are not about to have you verify that.
We have the power and you are not going to get it. The point in having elections is to maintain the same people in power, and to find out who are the dissidents and control them, and make the people weary and without hope.
Read closely and note how this and similar articles always delineate "Taliban extremists". IRI and Taliban are well-linked, and some of our financial "support" for Musharraf, for better or for worse, ends up as resource for Taliban.
Americans don't have the stomach for that sort of thing, so the MSM rhetoric must be surgical with their vernacular.
Lets see ... you can write of the entire NWFP region (the Waziristans, etc) ... they will not vote ... the Baluchis consider this a joke, Sindh wants to break away and Pakistan occupied Kashmir has no voting rights. Voting would be restricted to the cities if at all.
This entire sham of an election should be cancelled. Musharraf should first resign. The judges need to be re-instated. The army should retire to the barracks and get their claws out of the Govt. Only then can free and fair elections be held.
Ken its the ISI...who is the IRI? I think the author made a mistake there. You're right on point though.