Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
With Kucinich's Exit, Democratic Discourse Is Diminished
The media managers of the 2008 presidential contest worked for months to get Dennis Kucinich off the stage and out of the running. And they have finally succeeded, as the Ohio Congressman says he is now "transitioning out of the presidential campaign" and into a tough Democratic primary race for reelection to his Cleveland-area U.S. House seat.
Kucinich's decision to quit the Democratic presidential race is an acknowledgement of reality. Never flush with the funds needed to buy paid media, he has lately been denied access to the free media that is the lifeblood of insurgent candidacies. The congressman was excluded from the last few debates by the television networks, and his campaign events -- even those that drew substantial crowds in New Hampshire and Michigan - had gone largely uncovered.
The casual dismissal of what for Kucinich was always a sincere, issue-oriented endeavor made it easy for critics at home -- led by the virulently anti-Kucinich Cleveland Plain Dealer newspaper -- to ridicule a campaign that raised critical issues as little more than an ego trip. That encouraged challengers to enter the March 4 Democratic primary contest for Ohio's 10th District House seat.
The critics claim that Kucinich has neglected his constituents in order to pursue what Bill Clinton might refer to as a "fairytale" campaign for a nomination that was never realistically within reach. "Our district is heading in the wrong direction because we have an absentee congressman," says Cleveland City Councilman Joe Cimperman, whose primary challenge to Kucinich has been generously funded by special-interest groups that disdain the incumbent's independent streak.
Kucinich, who flew to Cleveland rather than to South Carolina or California after the New Hampshire primary in which his campaign received more votes than the "serious" candidacy of debate-regular and one-time media darling Fred Thompson, was anything but an absentee congressman during his presidential run. If anything, the congressman neglected the national race in order to spend time in his district and on the floor of the House -- where he maintained a far steadier attendance record than the senators against whom he was running for the presidential nomination.
The congressman's greatest attention to his district during the course of the presidential campaign took the form of his focus on the economic issues that are most important to a working-class district that includes portions of the city of Cleveland and neighboring blue-collar suburbs. Even as he discussed the essential subject of the war in Iraq, Kucinich usually did so in the context of a discussion about the cost the war was imposing not just on the distant battlefields of Iraq but on the American cities from which needed federal funds have been diverted to fund a fool's mission in the Middle East.
Much is made of the populist turn the presidential race has taken as economic conditions have worsened. But when none of the other candidates were taking pointed stands on trade policy, the mortgage crisis and real health-care reform, it was Kucinich who staked out precise positions and forced the other candidates to offer working Americans more than mere rhetoric.
The AFL-CIO extended an enthusiastic invitation to Kucinich to participate in the labor federation's August debate in Chicago because union leaders knew that he alone would guide the debate toward specifics on questions of how to reform free-trade agreements, renew industries and protect the rights of workers to organize. At that debate, it was Kucinich who earned the loudest applause. And rightly so. He was bringing the concerns of cities like Cleveland to the national stage.
One of things that most debate moderators found so frustrating about Kucinich was his determination to talk about the bread-and-butter issues that matter most to working Americans, rather than to play their games. Kucinich forced the anchormen and the reporters, as well as the other candidates, to pay a little attention to the problems of factory workers, shop clerks and farmers. There is no question that the Ohioan's determination to do this influenced more prominent and well-funded contenders, especially former North Carolina Senator John Edwards.
Kucinich never got much credit from the media or the other candidates. But he influenced the national debate for the better, and the race for the Democratic presidential nomination is diminished by his exit.
It is not just Kucinich who is leaving the national stage. It is the discussion about cities like Cleveland and Detroit and Milwaukee. Mayors have bemoaned the neglect of urban affairs in this year's campaign, but the former big-city mayor never allowed that neglect to become complete. Now, it may be, as least as far as the presidential race in concerned. But the congressman's determination to retain his House seat points to the likelihood that Congress will still be called upon to consider the concerns of a city on Lake Erie and the so frequently-forgotten people who live there.
John Nichols is a co-founder of Free Press and the co-author with Robert W. McChesney of TRAGEDY & FARCE: How the American Media Sell Wars, Spin Elections, and Destroy Democracy — The New Press.
© 2008 The Nation



81 Comments so far
Show AllWas Kucinich for real? Did he ever have a chance? Was he a vanity candidate? Did he blow it? Did he disgrace our cause by losing? Well?
People, wake up! Kucinich did what he could and motivated many people, but not nearly enough, to get into action around the issues that we all (I presume) believe in and care about. His campaign might not have been the answer, but are we not better off because he ran? Where did he fail? The answer, my friends, is in US. WE are the ones who need to build a great mass movement for change if anything is going to change. WE are the ones who need to organize the millions of disenfranchised, disillusioned and disaffected people (which description includes most of us, to be honest about it) and bring them into action. And when we do we will need people like Kucinich to help give us voice and leadership and the wisdom that comes from decades of passionate struggle.
I have posted on ten different websites - including this one - about what we need to do to build a movement that can contest for power in 2012. These posts received on average less than one comment per website, and not a single response that talked about the specifics, about how to build a movement that can win. People seem to be content to let a hero like Kucinich do it for us, and then to carp about it when he can't do it without us.
What's it going to take? We have this great medium available to us now, the Internet, on which to talk to each other about things like this. Well, let's start talking! Time to get serious, while we still have time!
ps. Don't forget to send Kucinich some money - at www.kucinich.us - to defend his seat. Our enemies have donated a huge amount of money to his opponents to try to knock him out and silence his voice in Congress. We can't let that happen!
Now the media can concentrate on insuring John Edwards is given the same treatment.
Kem Patrick, "the media" already has if you mean The Nation magazine. They ignored Kucinich for months and months when he could have used their support. For fun, count up all the covers featuring Barack Obama in The Nation last year and then the amount that featured Dennis. (Dennis got one cover and it was the one that featured every Dem running for president.) They've done a little better with Edwards but not much.
What a great loss to the tone of debate within the fetid Democratic Party Dennis's absence will mean. He has been an inspiration, and I hope he continues to advocate in Congress for the working class for many years to come.
What a great loss to the tone of debate within the fetid Democratic Party Dennis's absence will mean. He has been an inspiration, and I hope he continues to advocate in Congress for the working class for many years to come.
It was effectively the networks and print media that got him out of the race. It was their slanted and selected coverage that kept him on the very fringes of the political discourse. And when you talk about the media and the influential print media you are talking about editors. Editors who Jack London described in IRON HEEL as: "They draw their salaries for the policy they maintain. Their policy is to print nothing that is a vital menace to the established. The press of the United States? It is a parasitic growth that battens on the capitalist class. Its function is to serve the established by moulding public opinion, and right well it serves it." Once the editors marginalized him he had no chance of going mainstream. But his exclusion will give him more time to try and get impeachment back on the table.
Hoa binh
Pretty sad when the best commentary on the realities of our electoral system is in a satirical newspaper:
http://www.theonion.com/content/columnists/a_letter_of_introduction
Then again, the citizens of this country, with the exception of a brief period in the 1960s, haven't had any real say in the governing of their nation since Woodrow Wilson, with the help of the advertising industry, conned the American public into entering World War I. Or was it McKinley and the Spanish-American War, with the help of William Randolph Hearst?
With respect to any grassroots strategy, this is my thought. I do NOT want another repeat....Clinton that is. We need something better and the same old same old ain't it.
They might have the media. They might have all the "powerful" connections, but they don't have the grassroots and how could they?
I appreciate all Dennis Kucinich has done and his spirit will live on even if it is just amongst those who make the effort.
If the effort is maintained, it will prevail in the long run if it is just. We all might be dead by then, but at least we can die knowing that we were true to better ideas about humanity.
Peace,
Ken
Lord Trigo... FDR was representative of the people. Even Eisenhower wasn't too bad. I would say that the seventies were the beginning of the disappearing act (DEMOCRACY) that was finally complete with the termination of DK.
This comes back to Marx who said only violent revolution could overthrow the establishment. For the first time I can finally recognize the desire of Americans to arm themselves to the teeth. Corporate America successfully dismantled democracy with their dog and pony shows disguised as NEWS or DEBATE or PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGNS. I personally have run out of ideas on how to fight this behemoth corpocracy.
What most Americans fail to see is that the largest sponsor of terrorism is none other than our own government. As for the Americans who recognize the crimes of their government, they are powerless to fight it.
"I have seen the enemy and it is I." Julius Caesar
Astrologically speaking, all of the candidates are either on a downhill or a soup.
There are no Cancers or Capricorns running.
The Aries/leo last gasp is this year.
Maybe Obama can sustain himself till his Leo shine runs out.
Actually, I would not count on that beyond this month.
The Republican Hilary has a better chance.
Awful, I know, and it also mumbo jumbo for some of you folks- but it always pans out that way.
Look at Federer.
The Giants will win the Superbowl.
Nadal just lost. So will Edwards loose
For what its worth....
Zero
i really wish he and cynthia mckinney would run as independents. not neccesarily so they could win but just to get into the debates and say alot of things that need to be heard......
ZeroPointField - I am cheering for the giants, but are you willing to take a bet on that speculation? My brain says the Patriots are a good bet.
As far as that Clinton person, she might be a surprise, but I wouldn't bet on that. I'd rather have just about anyone else even a Republican.
By the way, don't give up on the Leo's.
Peace,
Ken
I for one will NOT tune in on the California debate. Its all nothing but a hollywood play, and the same rhetoric. The debate is nothing but a waste of time with DK present. And I agree that J.Edwards is in the race to become VP and take votes away from Obama. Oh my God J.McCain will pick up where Bush left off.
I think progressives should at this point support Ron Paul as the most viable TOTAL anti war candidate. He also supports dismantling corporate welfare and the empire to boot. You'll survive four more years without universal healthcare (maybe) and only DK's plan wasn't a giveaway to special interests anyway. Supporting Paul is a primary thing and in the general election you'll have plenty of time and hopefully money left to support the Greens who have always been the best vehicle for spreading progressive ideals. Maybe there could even be a popular front (which will require working with some very unprogressive people) effort to just beat U.S. imperialism and civil liberities theft.
KEM PATRICK wrote:
.....Now the media can concentrate on insuring John Edwards is given the same treatment.....
In my observation the media have been quite effectively ensuring John Edwards' marginalization for awhile now. In fact I read an article yesterday in which he was described as "the perennial also-ran." This, in reference to last Monday evening's Democratic debate in South Carolina.
I am thoroughly disgusted (understatement) by the national print and broadcast media's failure to adequately cover the Edwards campaign.
>> I am being very restrained here. <<
Edwards is getting my vote in the primary.
I wish Dennis Kucinich the very best going forward.
James06,
I couldn't agree with you more about The Nation. It's been pretty awful in this primary season. John Nichols himself wrote a column about the greatness of Joe (I love credit card companites) Biden. Yesterday, I got to hear Katrina Vandanheuval herself wax eloquent about why Obama's Reagan remark was not so bad after all.
So many progressives have gone mad, lately. Thank god for common dreams.
So what are we, as voters to do? When a candidate that actually cares about more than getting elected is ignored and basically ignored by the media, how can we "get back" at the media? Write letters to CNN, NBC, PBS, etc? Turn off the idiot box?
Seriously, I am very disappointed that Dennis is dropping out of the race, but I'm more angered about the complicity of the conservative-owned media.
Freedom of the press, my ass. Freedom of the press owners.
What can we do?
Losertarian Yes I would cross the line and vote for Ron Paul. I still think a DK and RP would be the ticket to elect.
Nice quote, since1492!
Here's another: "News is what powerful people don't want you to hear; everything else is just publicity." -- Bill Moyers.
And the FCC just increased Big Business's stranglehold on the press: one company can now own all the media in any given market!
In the future, I suspect the way to political office will simply be a proxy battle between media moguls... oh wait, did I say, "In the future?"
I stopped paying attention to The Nation after it supported Al Gore and dissed Ralph Nader. I switched to The Progressive instead, which did endorse Nader in 2000. The Nation seems comfortable with the kind of half-measures liberalism which gives the illusion of progress and disguises the same-old, same-old reality of American party politics. The Kucinich withdrawal is just another victory for the oligarchy which runs our government and economy. Both Republican and Democratic parties will continue to serve military Keynesianism and outsourcing until it completely hollows out our economy and leaves us with a landscape of blasted-out public schools, roads and industrial plants.
The European Union is already the richest political entity in the world, not us. China will also soon surpass us in wealth. We are number two, working on being number three, but the two-party band will continue to play it's same "God Bless America" tune.
The real story that everyone is ignoring is that Kucinich is also dropping out because he is, for the first time facing four, no doubt DLC/DNC-apporved contenders for his congressional seat in Cleveland.
These candidates will probably smear, slander and throw mud all over Kucinich in spite of him representing a perfectly secure district where he gets easily re-elected every time. But, for pushing for the impeachment of the White House Criminals, and for standing for the worker, and for principle over personal gain, the Democrat party leadership has decided he's got to go.
Just as the term "being Kuciniched" has entered our vocabulary to describe the ongoing corporate media's follow-up work dissapearing Edwards, Kucinich may be getting "Cynthia McKinnied" - double-crossed by his own sold-out party.
The multiple number of candidates will help work in his favor, but still, PLEASE go to Kucinich's _Congressional_ primary election website, http://www.kucinich.us/ and send him some money. The primary election is just 42 days away.
I stand corrected. How did I forget about FDR?
Y'all remember that one guy going on and on about how it was OK for Iowa to exclude Kucinich since he wasn't even trying?...doesn't seem fair.
One question: Why would Clinton pick Edwards? How does he help her win?
I am so bored of that poser Kucinich. I'm glad he's dropped out of the race and I hope he loses his seat so we don't have to watch him run another tedious vanity candidacy next time.
Edwards primary votes has to go somewhere in the general election. Who will Edwards throw his support to? But I think Hillery might choose Richardson or Joe Biden, during the debate she was always agreeing with Biden.
We need Kucinich in congress to fight for the PEOPLE... they are slandering him in Cleveland, and legal fees to fight NCB and have a recall for democracy have left him needing $$$$$... So donate to his campaign here:
http://www.kucinich.us
He is our voice, so put your money where ... well you get the idea...
I fear this will cause a lot of disatified/PO'd dems to sit out the 08 elections.
Gavin gourley wrote,
"I hope he loses his seat so we don't have to watch him run another tedious vanity candidacy next time.
Sure Gavin, sure thing,that's why Kucinich ran; not for high principles that go beyond self; not for an uncompromising vision of a USA that finally joins the world in guaranteeing medical care, higher educaton and a decent wage for all, but for vanity.
Sure.
And oddly enough, that's what you types always accuse the similarly principled Nader of too: "he ran because of a big ego".
But, of course, manifestly venial, self serving, rich, greedy, scum like Gore, Kerry, obama, Hillary - NO! They don't have big egos! Their motives are entire beyone reproach!
Gavin, go to Hell.
PJD - thanks for saying what I was thinking!
John Nichols advised the candidate last October: "If Kucinich were to commit now to mount a campaign that made no pretense of personal electability but rather promised to force the party to debate its direction—not just on the war but on the whole question of what a post-Bush America might look like—he could yet turn himself into the most effective protest candidate this country has seen in years." Read that article with this one. See http://www.progressive.org/mag_nichols1107 .
No PJD I won't go to hell. I'm sick of watching the Progressive movement diminsh under the weight of self-righteous mouthpieces who are incapable of forming sound political strategies. You, and many others like you, would prefer to be excluded from the halls of power as it gives you freedom to bask in your own self-righteousness without any danger of having to deal with the consequences of your actions.
That is why Kucinich ran. He had no hope of ever winning the nom, yet consistently pretended that he did. He's a laughing stock and has tarred the Progressive movement with the same brush. I know he means well, I'm not accusing him of deception, but I am accusing him of ignoring reality in favor of entertaining delusions of political relevance.
Why would he do that? Vanity? He likes to see himself on TV? Likes to think of himself as being important? Yep, that pretty much sums it up. He did not, in any way, shape
or form, make a positive contribution to the Progressive agenda in this country, except within the aforementioned coterie of equally vain, self-righteous progressives.
Nader also should have dropped out of the race after it became apparent he wasn't going to win. It's not clear whether his votes would have benefitted Gore, but that's irrelevant.
You are right that they all have big egos - Kucinich, Nader, Clinton, Obama, Edwards, McCain, Bush. All of them, no question about it. They all maintain their positions by building coalitions of power - labor unions, corporations, parties, etc. We need a progressive voice with the power to build a coalition like this, and they'll need a big ego to hold it all together.
Kucinich. Is. Not. That. Voice.
PJD, Grow a brain.
But as I already mentioned above, our main job now is keeping Kucinich in Congress. We only have a month. Please read my post above.
There's a real danger that McCain will be our next president. They Times just gave him the nod, and all kinds of fake liberals -- and the lapdog media--will fall, once again, for the Straight Talk Express story line. It's all about the story line.... Facts are so last century.
Are there any longer any progressives anywhere, regardless of how delusional, who still believe that their ideas are welcome in the Democratic Party?
Good grief!
gavingourley, now that you're done telling PJD to grow a brain, no doubt you'll be expecting him to be your ally in that progressive coalition.
Vanity is irrelevant. Policy is what matters. It is time to fall out of love with the critique of vanity.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." John F. Kennedy
Obama's principle foreign policy adviser is Zbigneiew Breshinski, seasoned bitter warmonger, who is the reason I voted for Barry Commoner in 1980.
Hillary Clinton is unelectable. Have you looked at her negatives? Mrs. DLC can forget my vote.
The Republicans own all the big media outlets, and know John Edwards would win, hands down, if they gave him equal time, and they have no intention of doing so. John Edwards can't afford to buy the election, so he is out.
The Republicans are all dogs who are clearly insane. If a moderator asked who among them did not believe in erosion about half the hands would go up. "There hasn't been time - the world is only 6000 years old." "We will stay in Iraq for 100 years!" "All Federal taxes and programs are illegal and must be eliminated."
They let around 11 of those mentally disturbed clowns spread across the stage, but could not find a 4th chair for Kucinich.
It's a sad day.
McCain is in his slow learning phase right now.
He may come out the winner in November, when Saturn will no longer be in Virgo.
But money will be very hard to come by for him after October.
For what its worth....
Just in case there is anyone who really and honestly wonders why the MSM neglected DK and shut him out of the debates, go to:
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/1/16/breaking_the_sound_barrier_democracy_now
and watch Dennis get the chance that the others had--no more time just the same amount of time--to answer the same questions and comment on the other candidates stands where they were contradictory with their records.
His shining moment came at Soldier Field in Chicago and at that time the MSM determined they would never do him that favor again. I know that many Common Dreamers agree with me that DK was the only thing enjoyable about this whole electoral process and, alas, now he is gone--but not ever forgotten.
Right On PJD! I couldn't have said it better.
Gavingourley's horserace fixation shows that he believes that unless a candidate is "sure" to win there's no reason to continue to represent the people who have put their faith, time, money and effort into his or her campaign. His idea seems to be that a candidate who is unlikely to win is irresponsible if they to continue to fight for the issues and values they were nominated by their constituents to champion. According to the Gourley Mandate, Nader (or Kucinich) should have turned his back on all of his supporters just to make life easier for whichever corporatist clone was bound to win the election because issues mean nothing, values are unimportant and challenging the status quo is a waste of time--because the status quo wins every time and only a fool would bother trying to change that.
Come on now people, EMBRACE THE GOURLEY MANDATE. If you waste your vote on someone who represents your personal views and best interests you are either stupid or just plain evil. The only vote not wasted is the one cast for the WINNER! Otherwise, if you vote for a loser, you'll be a loser too! And nobody likes a loser. Changing the political discourse, speaking truth to power, staying true to your principles and fighting for what is right even in the face of so-called "impossible" odds--these are not attributes to be admired, commended and appreciated, they are to be ridiculed.
Humbug, Gavin! Humbug!
Hillary's negatives are a secret now.
If she gets the nomination there will be a thermometer like graphic that shows a range from zero to 100, gaging her negatives, on every newspaper front page and TV news broadcast every day. They will start it at 55% and a there will be a feature story on the front page 6 days a week on her "record negatives," with the appropriate speculation and unnamed sources. "Hillary's grating delivery and scowl may explain some of her now record high negatives."
"Hillary, with her record high negatives, has little chance of defeating the jocular [any Republican]" goes here.
"Record high negatives," by November, will be her middle name.
By the time they are through, turnout with be a record low, and we will have a completely psychotic fool as President again.
gavingourley... any suggestions? Your rather hollow critique sounds like you've been spending too much time wallowing in the false premise that our corporate media menu of candidates and rigged debates are a legitimate process of democracy.
Perhaps the reason Kucinich ran is because no other candidate was bringing up the rape of the constitution and the necessity for impeachment. What so called "progressives" like you don't seem to comprehend is that it is a public servant's duty to call for impeachment... not some glamor game to pad an ego.
To fill you in, since you seem to be out of the loop, Kucinich won every debate that our corporate masters allowed him to participate in. What else do you want from a candidate? He won over or made a significant impression on a huge amount of people that were undecided and a lot of people who didn't even know who he was.
He's not a perfect progressive candidate but he's pro-constitution and was the best option on the table... perhaps you could enlighten us as to who you think would have presented a better campaign.
"He's a laughing stock and has tarred the Progressive movement with the same brush."... what the hell are you talking about. Go back to your ingestion of CNN pal. Or better yet, go read the Huffingtonpost/Enquirer and then pat yourself on the back for being "progressive"... schmuck.
This is a very sad time, without Kucinich..there is no one in the race that even remotely represents people, not corporations. There is no candidate to end the wars, end NAFTA, end WTO, end the Patriot Act, and to bring health care to the 47 million Americans that will die because they dont have it.
Paul/Gravel Green Party 2008!?
Let me put it this way, Gavin.
Today, the Toronto star reported that a puppy adopted from a large animal shelter had rabies. They immediately put the news out that anyone who may have had contact with this animal, or others from the shelter, report to the local health department for consideration for the rabies vaccine. Rabies is 100.0% fatal once symptoms appear, so rabies vaccines were offered for anyone who thought they may be at risk. Of course, it went without mentioning that in Canada, the vaccine series was absolutely free to everyone.
Now, I once got bitten by a stray cat that had a big wound from a fight from some kind a animal (racoon?) in my urban neighborhood, a couple weeks after a rabid cat had been reported in a nearby neighborhood. The bite was on a forearm, so I had a little time. After the recommended a 10-day wait for the cat to reappear, (a rabid cat would be dead by that time - so if it re-appeared it wasn't rabid - it didn't appear) I played it safe and went to my emergency room (the only place that administers it) and got the 10CC Immune globulin at the bite site, followed by the 5-shot vaccene series over the next month. I has insurance, so it "only" cost me about $650.00. If I hadn't had had insurance, the bill would have approached $10,000, and I would have had to gambled with my life on the cat not being rabid.
This same situation happens every day with poor USAn working class women when they discover a breast lump.
Now, the only candidate that supports a healthcare program might someday save a poor USAn from the latter situation was Kucinich, through his bill HR676 - Medicare for All Act. HR 676 is the only proposed measure that move the US to the minimum healthcare standards of the rest of the civilized world. The rest only give lip service and vague promises, while kissing big insurance ass. So, if "sound strategies" mean giving up hope that the USA can EVER enjoy the minimal standards of personal security that Canadians, and French, and everyone else in the fucking civilized world takes for granted, then you can TAKE YOUR "SOUND STRATEGIES" AND SHOVE THEM UP YOUR ASS!
ZERO POINT FIELD: As a professional astrologer I welcome the subject in the forum but I must correct you. First of all, Saturn spends two years (or more) in any give sign to fulfill its orbit of 29 years. It will be in Virgo until late October of 2009! (not 2008)
Second, while it's true this nation has elected its share of Cancers and Aquarians, it is naive to make assumptions on the basis of a sun sign designation alone. For anyone with a serious interest in this subject, Dell Horoscope Magazine (December 2007 issue) did an excellent analysis of the FULL chart portraits of Edwards, Obama & Hillary. (Not my work, but very well done.) I happen to HOPE the prediction was incorrect, but only time will tell. I was hoping for a long shot to enter the race to perhaps alter the predictions. This is still possible.
exeflyer,
Ron Paul is a dog eat dog capitalist forget about him!
First, I'm sorry to see Dennis Kucinich exit the Presidential race, but can understand and totally support his facing reality and concentrating on maintaining his presence in Congress. I hope his constituents see the importance of his continuing to champion the causes that he represents.
Second, I can't understand the need for some people to insult each other and call each other names - or to cast aspersions on someone's motivations for running for office. It's a given that running for President requires a big ego and certain amount of vanity - it's not everyone who can look in the mirror and say to themselves, with all seriousness, "I can be the next President of the United States." Sadly, for all too many such individuals, the "vision" and "policy" reasons for this are all too obscure (see Mitt Romney or Rudy Giuliani - or our current President - as cases in point). Dennis, at least, had both a clear vision and substantive policy reasons for running.
Third, the MSM definitely marginalized Dennis' candidacy, and this is unconscionable. But the "progressives" were just as guilty. How many people who read CommonDreams were allowing themselves - like the Nation - to ignore Dennis Kucinich's vision, thinking that John Edwards or Barack Obama are "good enough"? How many labor unions are supporting candidates who don't really represent their core values, when they could have been supporting an actual card-carrying union member? A few months ago, as in 2004, I would hear many people justify their support of John Edwards (or Howard Dean then), even if he wasn't as "progressive" as Dennis Kucinich, that at least his rhetoric sounded right and he was "electable". Now that Edwards has demonstrated that he is as electable as Fred Thompson, these same people are clinging to the same arguments that those who supported Kucinich were making: even if it's virtually impossible for him to get the nomination, it's important to support him because we want his views to continue to be heard, and if he has enough delegates, he could shape the national Democratic Party Platform.
I find it ironic that many "progressives" find themselves championing an unelectable candidate who supports universal health care that isn't universal and that keeps for-profit health care in place, when they could have been supporting single-payer, not-for-profit health care; that they are championing withdrawal from Iraq that keeps a U.S. presence there, when they could have been supporting an immediate withdrawal, establishment of a reconciliation forum, and a Department of Peace; that they are championing trade policies that keep the race to the bottom in place, when they could have supported the cancelling of NAFTA and the WTO and the establishment of trade policies that recognize worker's right, human rights, and environmental quality principles.
Thus, we are left with three Democratic candidates who, while all substantially better than any of the Republican candidates, are largely similar on policy grounds.
If we look at the Iraq War as just one central example, we are left with one candidate who voted for the Iraq War resolution, and now repudiates that vote but has had no substantive forum in which to demonstrate his new views beyond the campaign trail; another candidate who was opposed to the Iraq War resolution but voted for continued funding time and again; and a third candidate for voted for the Iraq War resolution and continued funding and has never apologized for or repudiated those votes, but who criticizes the other candidates for not being consistent in their opposition to the Iraq War. And all three candidates continue to support unprovoked military incursion into other countries if it is "in the national interest" - a continuation of the Bush foreign policy doctrine. This is truly a fools' choice.
Finally, thanks to Dennis Kucinich for continuing to raise these and many other important viewpoints and issues that are barely mentioned in the Presidential campaign. Best wishes to him in his Congressional campaign and his continued work in Congress and elsewhere.
How to fight fascism? Keep your money out of Wall Street Mart. If it contributes to the death of the planet, don't buy it. Some interesting things here: www.solari.com
I think the best strategy for all of us is to make sure no one wins these primary elections so that when the convention starts it will be an open convention and the delegates promised to individual candidates after the first vote can vote for anyone including Dennis Kuchinich or Al Gore or Robert Kennedy Jr. etc.
There are some people in this world who are compelled to stand up for truth and justice even if they stand alone. It is not ego, it is a calling. There is and never has been any ego-feeding glory in Kucinich's stands or his presidential campaigns. In fact, it has been quite a lot of sacrifice, subjecting himself and now his wife to intense public criticism and bullying, lies, and intentional attempts to publicly humiliate him down to using the most immature, morally devoid tactics like criticizing his appearance, his height, even his name. Campaigning is exhausting, gruelling work -- honestly, a strange sort of torture. When I spent an evening in Las Vegas with him last November, he was running on about 3 hours sleep, still going well after midnight. He did it for us, and today we all feel a bit more hopeless.
He has committed the ultimate "deadly sin" - he dared to call for the impeachment of both Cheney and Bush, and to accuse his own party leadership of complicity in the lies. They will not let him survive this. And don't kid yourselves about the power of those who run this country. Why do you think no one else is putting their careers on the line like Kucinich even in the face of such blatant and obvious corruption and deception?
And it is a misnomer to call our media "the media". Our "media" are the most powerful corporate interests on earth in control of the most powerful opinion- shaping, mind-controlling, brainwashing tools available to mankind. We have allowed this monster to come into being and we are now paying the price. We have given them the political and economic equivalents of nuclear weapons -- there is no standing up to them now. They convinced us that what was good for them was good for us, and now they have everything. They are so powerful, they don't even try to conceal their attempts to control everything anymore (as in excluding candidates from the debates). We all know it is completely futile to attempt to change the status quo. Even the whole rest of the world COMBINED feels powerless to stop them.