Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Not in the Script
In the 1998 movie 'The Truman Show,' the hapless Truman lives his entire life on a TV set where, unbeknownst to him, everyone else is an actor. An unwanted child, Truman was adopted in infancy by a corporation that made him the center of the world's longest running reality show, with hidden cameras trained on him night and day.
Because Truman has no one to tell him the truth, he goes many years before questioning his existence-even though a few people have attempted to set him straight. While opening presents one Christmas morning, a man bursts through the living room window screaming that it's all a lie. Someone else parachutes onto the set to warn Truman. A pretty young extra who takes a shine to Truman tells him her real name before being hustled off the set by a producer.
On January 15 four activists from the audience interrupted The Tonight Show to shout out 'Let Dennis debate,' and 'GE, NBC, put impeachment on TV.' For Leno's guest, Bill Maher, it must have seemed like déjàvu: in October, activists from We Are Change disrupted his show by yelling 'Tell us about building seven.'
Like the man bursting through the window on The Truman Show, these interlopers were hustled away ASAP. They had only seconds to make an impression before being silenced.
There are eerie similarities between the set Truman inhabited and today's media landscape. Like Truman, we believe we know what's going on because we seem to have many independent sources of information which corroborate each other in important ways.
But almost all our media is controlled by just six corporations: Disney, Viacom, Time Warner, News Corp, Bertelsmann, and General Electric. Their holdings include the major TV networks, movie studios, book and magazine publishers, radio stations, cable channels, sports teams, theme parks and comic books. Except for conversations with family and friends, millions of Americans are never exposed to a point of view not vetted by the Big Six.
It appears that we're being exposed to a wide range of ideas, when in fact certain opinions and facts will never be seen or heard, but by those few who aggressively search out alternative sources.
Perhaps flying across the country to bellow out your message in one frantic sentence on The Tonight Show seems extreme-to those who are oblivious to the extent to which the mainstream media has shut out the truth. Like the man bursting through the window on The Truman Show, these activists are making a heroic effort to penetrate the corporate bubble encasing us.
If you're still under the spell of the Big Six, this may seem preposterous. We've been taught that we have freedom of the press, and perhaps we did, 25 years ago, when 50 corporations controlled our media, not five.
It's beyond the scope of this essay to go into what is being hidden, and why. You can find out, if you really want to know. First you must have some inkling that there are important things you don't know, and it's no accident that you don't know them.
The person parachuting onto the set to warn Truman that his life is a lie may simply be brushed off as a nutcase-or he might make Truman wonder, just a little, if all is not as it seems. The activists who disrupted The Tonight Show should do the same for us. You might consider yourself well informed, plugged in, in the know. Still, someone is trying desperately to tell you something. All is not as it seems.
Sheila Casey, who worked for years as an award-winning advertising writer, has returned to her first love of journalism after being jolted by the nation's slide into fascism.



35 Comments so far
Show AllOh, and if you any info on this that I can share given the blackout by the gov of thought reading technology, my email is echoes44442002@yahoo.com and my name is Kathy Heckman.
lwhunt330: What are they hiding??? They're hiding their crimes and misdeeds going all the way up to the highest offices of power. They're covering up for the lies they've told the public... they're covering up their treason, murder, black-market peddling of weapons technology, war crimes, drug dealing, etc... Sibel Edmunds knows the truth... and really, I'm surprised she hasn't had an "accident" yet. A brave and noble woman. Read this if you want to know more: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5518
Just as the media picks the candidates that they consider to be "valid", that YOU will be ALLOWED to hear and vote for, they also determine the issues that can be raised and debated.
EDWARDS '08
"We've been taught that we have freedom of the press, and perhaps we did, 25 years ago" Perhaps is the operative word here. Even with 50 corporations controlling our media, the lies about Vietnam went unchallenged by the mainstream media. What got me started as a young woman who had always gone along with the story was simply that it felt wrong for LBJ to bomb Vietnam. I started researching the history of Vietnam and finding alternative news sources. The Internet today makes it so much easier. But first you have to want to learn the truth. And for that you have to wake up to the reality that you're being lied to.
Reality may yet come, especially with the looming economic meltdown.
kathyodat
Let's say I want to search farther. I've heard the warning of the Parachuting Man, and now I want to find the truth; where do I go? I read Commondreams.org Truthdig.com and Democracynow.org everyday, but what else is there? I'm not looking for crazy left-wing liberal propganda stuff, I just want real, factual, unbiased news from somewhere other than the Big Six sources. Any suggestions?
Well Sheila this was a very good article, but directed at to narrow of an audience. A great deal of those who will read this essay on CD already "have some inkling that there are important things you don't know, and it's no accident that you don't know them."
I don't suppose you could get Leno to read this in his Monologue?
ToggleSwitch, you google key words such as "parachuting man warning" (I'm not sure what you're talking about here). If it's a movie, or news story or whatever, include any reference to narrow your search. Leave out small words. You will get many pages, and the fewer hits, the further away the information. So sometimes you have to search through ten or twenty pages or more to find what you're looking for. I had to look through ten pages to find information of harm to dogs with microchip implants. It was all anecdotal, no studies, which helps explain why it was so far down the line.
kathyodat
To: ToggleSwitch
Here are some interesting sites:
http://www.inequality.org/
Click on "By the Numbers" and look at our skewed distribution of wealth.
http://www.opensecrets.org/
Money and politics go hand-in-hand.
http://www1.environmentalhealthnews.org/
The environment and what it's doing to us.
http://organicconsumers.org
Our food and also what it's doing to us.
http://www.nrdc.org/
The Natural Resources Defense Fund has challenged this administration in court and won.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/
Judicial Watch also fights on behalf of people.
http://www.cspinet.org/
The Center for Science in the Public Interest has real science.
"Inkling"? You're funny, Chunga.
kathyodat
ToggleSwitch, what makes it "crazy left-wing liberal propganda stuff", the fact that it's true?
The left has been telling the world for 6 years that Bush and Cheney were telling lies to get us into war, and now the media admits it. See this article -
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/01/23/6551/
They used to call us left-wing crazies. There are plenty of independent media outlets out there, but anything that gives a different perspective from the corporate MSM is deemed "left-wing liberal propganda stuff".
Yes, Toggle, listen to left wing crazies. We know that this reality show sucks.
I would suggest that you follow links from the sources you already check. That should take you to interesting places.
Sibel Edmunds has been trying to parachute into the set for several years now and has been consistently thrown back out silently by both the Republicans and Democrats. What are they hiding?
ToggleSwitch: There is no such thing as "Left" and "Right"... those concepts are obsolete. There is only Good and Evil... and both "right and left" contain both. You will NEVER be able to find completely unbiased reporting as the author's opinion will always show through. To determine the truth, read as many sources as you can and find the commonalities. Basically, do what Sherlock Holmes said... "gather the evidence, remove the untruths and what is left is the truth"... however implausible it may seem. In fact, the real truth is far more frightening than any fiction. Good luck to you.
Ok, something I know: The U.S. Federal government is covertly using thought reading technology and practicing personality-change 'creation' on it's citizens, since 1994's Clinton Administration. So we've had 14 years of two of the worst Presidents money can buy, and the hope of 4 more years with Hillary. But this isn't about Hillary, it's about FISA, the Patriot Act, Senate Bill 1959 (the 'Thought Crime Legislation'). It's about how the government is enacting legislation to make the use of this technology legal in hindsight, passing fake legislation for false reasons that has everything to do with technology they don't want us to know about.
I was proud to be an American, now I really think someday soon it would be prudent to leave this country. And I wish that wasn't true.
Toggleswitch wrote:
"I just want real, factual, unbiased news from somewhere other than the Big Six sources. Any suggestions?"
You are looking for something that doesn't exist.
The whole idea of 'balanced" professional journalism is a construct that only became prevalent after WW2. It was a deliberate cold-war backlash against the diversity of viewpoints (especially pro-worker or socialist ones) that existed until then. It replaced this diversity with a narrow range of allowable discourse.
But furthermore, the idea of balanced journalism itself is a logically impossible construct. As Zinn points out "You can't be neutral on a moving train" i.e. even the most careful neutral stance is still always an opinion for the status quo, and any attempt to find a "center" on which to compare ideas will fail, because that "center" will also be the status quo which changes wildly over space and time. For example, in the US, what was considered the loony Goldwater-right 40 years ago is the "center" today.
So, better that journalism return to the way it was in the old days, when the average medium to large city might have had a dozen broadsheet newspapers - each of them passionately covering events from the perspective of the faction, party, or labor union that owned the paper. With a dozen to pick from, you had all the "balance" you needed.
You still occasionally see a vestige of this vibrant era of journalism in some papers's names The "Baton Rouge Advocate", the "[various city] Democrat", etc...
As a reader of newspapers and a viewer of news in many countries, I would add that the problem with American news people working for the big chains or networks is that they are dishonest. Everyone has an opinion, a viewpoint, a perspective but American outlets try to hide theirs.
What a news organization should be is honest. Of course Disney has a point of view, so do the owners of General Electric ABC. What has happened though is that they have conned you with the promise of "balance".
"Don't worry that there is so few independent voices, we are balanced."
They are "balanced" which is a codeword for neutered. Their work either is harmless to their corporation or improves the bottom line. Of course American news people are not stupid, I've heard many an anchorperson or newspaper editor speak and they are lucid, informed people. The trouble is that their intellect and judgment don't make it into their reporting and so are of no use to their fellow citizens.
jlocke, of course they are balanced, like a seesaw. They sit on each others' boards. Helps to avoid unpleasant contradictions. Like Dennis. And now Edwards.
kathyodat
Speaking of Dennis being barred from the last debates: while it's unfortunate, he did get enough of a hearing and, let's be blunt, the U.S. electorate doesn't want him.
Given how utterly sane most of his positions are, and given how well he states them, I have to think it's more general brainwashing (and, frankly, people's ignorance), than that his access has been limited.
On another site, considered significantly left-leaning by its own members, and full of intelligent people capable of logical analysis, I posted the following in the middle of a long thread on politics and on the election and the various candidates:
"I'm impressed with the failure of Americans to understand that their country is on life support. You have:
a government that is able to kidnap, torture, and murder with impunity;
that sorry coup d'etat in 2000;
a Congress that acquiesces to the suspension of habeus corpus, for no defensible reason;
a government that routinely acts as a subsidiary of the Fortune 500 companies;
a country where polluting industries write the environmental laws;
the small matter of an illegal invasion and occupation that bankrupts the treasury and does so with no hope of accomplishing any significant goal;
managed to assemble the world's largest mercenary army, to which the government has essentially granted immunity to any legal consequences of its actions;
the fact that you can't even discover with whom your public servants meet and what they discuss;
the ongoing matter that even the extremely minimal requirements of FISA regarding eavesdropping are ignored. You can be monitored at the will of the government;
And on and on.
What do you think this election is about?"
***
It was as though I had broken wind at an elegant dinner party. There was essentially no comment on any of my post (except for a couple of the site's rightwingnuts who raved about the 2000 election), and those intelligent, left-leaning folks went back to talking about the significance of the preamble to the Constitution, and the minutae of geolibertarianism.
I guess this was an interesting, and very saddening test for me, in that if we can't interest *that* crowd in those deadly serious issues, whose consciousness *are* we going to raise?
FEMA demolished the World Trade Center Towers while people, including their own resuce workers, were still inside them under the orders of the White House through a secret building code called Godzilla!
The John Birch Society is a terrorist organization that participated in the JFK assassination bringing our current Taliban government of conservatism to power!
Hello, hello? Is this thing on?
ARKITEKTON: I'm sure posters agree with you. Perhaps they had nothing to add. You are talking to a small group watching the society at large chose a president. It is too late to get that public to understand in time for the elections. Go back to your list and notice the following:
1 A government that tortures, kidnaps and murders with impunity. Most people have no trouble with this, because they think only bad guys will be kidnapped and tortured. How can you change that attitude?
2.Coup d'etat in 2000: The supreme court made the decision, therefore it is ok. Even the democrats didn't fight it.
I could go on. All your items can be brushed away quite easily. How do you change that attitude? Where do you start?
Dear toggle switch and others,
I think the best news source, which is growing impressively, is the RealNews Network, check them out. They're just now expanding to open a Washington DC office, that will make a big difference:
therealnews.com
[I can't get this to look like a link should, oh well: type it in]
So how about we stop bitching and talk about what to do. Not that we are actually going to do something but at least let's talk about it.
1. How do we convince the people that the US is the bad guy?
2. How do we show the people they could have a better life if....
3. How do we get the people to feel part of the world?
4. How do we get people to not reach for the gun so quickly?
5. How do we get the people to become interested in understanding the world through observation and rational assessment instead of religion?
6. How do we get them interested in Science, especially Biology?
Is this already being done and I missed it?
How do we inform people without sounding crazy?
".... I could go on. All your items can be brushed away quite easily. How do you change that attitude? Where do you start?"
lizard,
I wish I knew. If someone is genuinely interested, you can start with such as the fact that the US government has demonstrably tortured innocents. You can show documented voter fraud and supression of black turnout in 2000. If they're not interested, of course, there isn't much you can do.
I *am* impressed by the following -- oh -- I guess I'm not. Msnbc.com had a link, now vanished, to a center that documented lie by lie the Bush gang's run up to the war. Apparently it was put together by a couple of independent news outfits. That's the sort of thing I would refer an interested person to.
One last thing--I don't think ANY of the items I noted can be "brushed away quite easily." It takes an elaborate delusional construct to believe they're not true. On the other hand, I might be better off in persuading fence sitters by omitting reference to the 2000 election.
LIZARD -- By inspection (and old math proof term), the fact that you post on this site, and are writing about talking to those other 95% "normal" (and willfully uninformed) people, means that you are already crazy (= abnormal).
They've been stacking the propaganda deck, pre-configuring the masses to answer certain questions reactively, and automatically.
The key solution is found in the creation of the mental "disease" itself, as following shocking events, the brain is pliable for new programming. The Neuro-Linguistic Programmers (NLP) use a clever verbal technique where a story is told, but while the subject's brain is happily following along - the story is interrupted unexpectedly (to listener, purposeful for speaker) - at this moment the subject's brain is subconsciously in a state of shock and "is searching for continuation of the input stream". Because the brain is essentially programmed to snatch and hold tightly to the next dribbles of words coming in, the skillful NLP practitioner (at this moment) has a deep connection to change the manner of thinking and a subject's ideas,being nearly infinitely suggestible.
Before the subject even realizes the story went overboard for just a moment, the narrative starts up again - only to have the NLPer repeat this cycle for each desired portion of imprinting. Taken together, the subject is never under hypnosis, and is only subconsciously aware of any programming, until those thoughts are triggered to arise AS IF they were our own.
I doubt that Naomi Klein goes into these details of how this 'SHOCK THERAPY' is implemented, but all of this is very well understood. And for myself, Tony Robbin's 6-hr lecture demonstrated this 100%, along with saying "cool moss", my feet and I fire-walked 20' of glowing embers.
LIZARD — All of the above can be simplified to "you cannot help but be viewed as crazy", when attempting to breakthrough the tough barriers that have been carefully tended and grown over decades.
ToggleSwitch, arkitekton check these out -
Discover What the World Thinks About U.S.
With Translated Foreign News Available NOWHERE Else In English.
http://www.watchingamerica.com/index.shtml
And it wasn't MSNBC that had the Lie-by-Lie website, it was Mother Jones Magazine, and the interactive site is still up at -
http://www.motherjones.com/bush_war_timeline/index.html
Check them out!
EDWARDS '08
"Something here just ain't exactly right."
What song was that?
To those who really want to know, I have these suggestions:
Look for sources that didn't require corporate approval to get in front of your eyeballs. A paper like the New York Times has to please its investors, advertisers and subscribers. But a documentary can be made by almost anyone with a camera and a video editor. My media diet now consists primarily of sites that don't accept advertising, books and documentaries. (I still read the NY Times, just to see what the mainstream storyline is.)
I read almost everything written by Paul Craig Roberts. A recent column, excellent as always, is at http://www.vdare.com/roberts/080122_moral.htm
Also check out the Center for Public Integrity, at http://www.publicintegrity.org/default.aspx
Some great documentaries, all available on Netflix, are:
Who Killed the Electric Car?
The Corporation
WMD: Weapons of Mass Deception
Orwell Rolls in His Grave
A Crude Awakening: The Oil Crash
The Insider
Why We Fight
America: Freedom to Fascism
The Oil Factor
Unconstitutional: The War on Our Civil Liberties
Terrorstorm: A History of Government Sponsored Terrorism
Unprecedented: The 2000 Presidential Election
9/11: Press for Truth
An Inconvenient Truth
My top three pics from the above list are:
1) Orwell rolls in his grave
2) Why We Fight
3) The Corporation (including the radio interview on Majority Report with Janeanne Garofolo).
Educate yourself with books. There are still progressive publishers who help authors tell the truth. I've recently read and highly recommend:
A New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing questions about 9/11 and the bush administration
Fooled Again: How the right stole the 2004 election and why they'll steal the next one
Feet to the Fire: The media after 9/11, top journalists speak out
Towers of Deception: The media cover-up of 9/11
Tragedy and Farce: How the American media sell wars, spin elections, and destroy democracy
Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil
The End of America: letter of warning to a young patriot
The Shock Doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism
Supercapitalism: The transformation of business, democracy and everyday life
Good luck to Toggleswitch and all those who truly want to know!
Sheila Casey
Sorry for the off topic comment but -
It's official, Kucinich is dropping out of the race! He says that he is not endorsing anyone, but he needs to endorse Edwards, and he needs to do it NOW, while it can still make a difference!
If you were a Kucinich supporter, tell him to endorse Edwards NOW!
EDWARDS '08
twoblueday, it's "For What It's Worth" written by Stephen Stills, played by Buffalo Springfield. First verse:
There's something happening here.
What it is ain't exactly clear.
There's a man with a gun over there,
Telling me I got to beware.
I think it's time we stop, children, what's that sound?
Everybody look what's going down.
kathyodat
Is it just a coincidence that the media companies named in the article, the ones that own all mainstream media outlets, all TV and radio news and entertainment as well as major publishing houses, are themselves all owned by Zionists? All of them. Can that be a coincidence?
Or is something going on?
rjhuntington, do you have any links you can post as sources for that claim, that all these media outlets are owned by Zionists? I'd be interested to see them.
Thanks.
rjhuntington, I would also like to see some references to back up your claim.
kathyodat
Wow, what a great site! I've found my fellow kindred spirits!
Just to add to the discussion: is it coicidence that not one--NOT ONE--single mainstream media or research organization (yes, that's YOU Consumer's Union! What the heck have you DONE since exposing the Corvair??) has EVER published an unbiased review of aluminum foil defenses to government radio waves?
I have tried Reynolds and, most recently, Kirkland brand from Costco, but I'm still receiving Karl--puke--Rove every weekday at 11am.
Wake up people! Consumer's Union is gone....what's next....."Free Tibet" bumpersticker manufacturers?
Peace out, TFH