How the Iraq War's $2 Trillion Cost to US Could Have Been Spent
In war, things are rarely what they seem.
Back in 2003, in the days leading up to the U.S. invasion of Iraq, the Pentagon adamantly insisted that the war would be a relatively cheap one. Roughly $50 billion is all it would take to rid the world of Saddam Hussein, it said.
We now know this turned out to be the first of many miscalculations. Approaching its fifth year, the war in Iraq has cost American taxpayers nearly $500 billion, according to the non-partisan U.S.-based research group National Priorities Project. That number is growing every day.
But it's still not even close to the true cost of the war. As the invasion's price tag balloons, economists and analysts are examining the entire financial burden of the Iraq campaign, including indirect expenses that Americans will be paying long after the troops come home. What they've come up with is staggering. Calculations by Harvard's Linda Bilmes and Nobel-prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz remain most prominent. They determined that, once you factor in things like medical costs for injured troops, higher oil prices and replenishing the military, the war will cost America upwards of $2 trillion. That doesn't include any of the costs incurred by Iraq, or America's coalition partners.
"Would the American people have had a different attitude toward going to war had they known the total cost?" Bilmes and Stiglitz ask in their report. "We might have conducted the war in a manner different from the way we did."
It's hard to comprehend just how much money $2 trillion is. Even Bill Gates, one of the richest people in the world, would marvel at this amount. But, once you begin to look at what that money could buy, the worldwide impact of fighting this largely unpopular war becomes clear.
Consider that, according to sources like Columbia's Jeffrey Sachs, the Worldwatch Institute, and the United Nations, with that same money the world could:
Eliminate extreme poverty around the world (cost $135 billion in the first year, rising to $195 billion by 2015.)
Achieve universal literacy (cost $5 billion a year.)
Immunize every child in the world against deadly diseases (cost $1.3 billion a year.)
Ensure developing countries have enough money to fight the AIDS epidemic (cost $15 billion per year.)
In other words, for a cost of $156.3 billion this year alone - less than a tenth of the total Iraq war budget - we could lift entire countries out of poverty, teach every person in the world to read and write, significantly reduce child mortality, while making huge leaps in the battle against AIDS, saving millions of lives.
Then the remaining money could be put toward the $40 billion to $60 billion annually that the World Bank says is needed to achieve the Millennium Development Goals, established by world leaders in 2000, to tackle everything from gender inequality to environmental sustainability.
The implications of this cannot be underestimated. It means that a better and more just world is far from within reach, if we are willing to shift our priorities.
If America and other nations were to spend as much on peace as they do on war, that would help root out the poverty, hopelessness and anti-Western sentiment that can fuel terrorism - exactly what the Iraq war was supposed to do.
So as candidates spend much of this year vying to be the next U.S. president, what better way to repair its image abroad, tarnished by years of war, than by becoming a leader in global development? It may be too late to turn back the clock to the past and rethink going to war, but it's not too late for the U.S. and other developed countries to invest in the future.
Craig and Marc Kielburger are children's rights activists and co-founded Free The Children, which is active in the developing world.
© Copyright Toronto Star 1996-2008
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
38 Comments so far
Show AllOops, I mis-typed again, it's not bunkhouse33 it's bunkhouse303, sorry. Linda has been off line for over two months now. I know she moved in October.
KEM,
I tried contacting Linda last year just to reach out and gain some contacts for resource sharing and the like: I promised that I wouldn't email again if she wasn't interested in responding, so I'm gonna keep my promise and try through the bunkhouse33 avenue. Thanks!
If that doesn't work Wondering you, try Bunkhouse33@msn.com That company can contact me.
~Wondering you~, Here is the E-mail address.
tenfingers10toes@yahoo.com
~the Wondering you~. Google Ten fingers Ten Toes Hawaii, there will be an article about Linda Faye Kroll and it has her website. Contact her and she will send you my e-mail address.
This is just horrifying, it just goes to show the sheer senselessness of war !
Its another coulda, woulda, shoulda article.
What a waste of time. Its done.
But if we could go back, make no mistake, till we have eliminated all these things from our own country, don't speak of the world.
Where does the responsibility lie for the solution to the worlds troubles? Perhaps the authors exemplify why the world see's us as arrogant?
And perhaps the money could have been spent on developing a pill that would cure the American mentality from always wanting to solve problems by bombing the hell out of others! The most sanguine ilk.
Looks like we have a choice to make.
We can continue to throw good money after bad, or we can stop being fucking idiots as a nation and make progress towards a better world. Hillary isn't going to get us there. I'm sorry, but I don't see Obama taking us down that road, either. You can forget all the Republican candidates, and I'm tempted to say that the Democratic candidates march to the same self drummer, though I'll give Edwards and most especially Kucinich the benefit of doubt.
Doubt? Is there still doubt? What kind of a moron would I have to be to believe that ending the war, recalling all the troops, restructuring our nation's energy policies and honestly addressing the problems of the human world (I'd like to be more ambitious and nix the word "human" there, but the only doubt left in me is in the wisdom of our species) would not be worth the effort? The effort at the gas pump. The effort at the grocery store. The effort at home to reduce where possible, recycle as much as you can, and reuse until there is no more use conceivable. The effort to change, and that is the greatest effort of all, but also the most effective.
Oh, and...KEM? I really REALLY want to know more about your wind powered generator plans. I'm serious. I'm a teacher, but still I've got time on my hands. I've built human-powered and hydro-powered systems, I've got great contacts to Big Thinkers, and I'm very adept at building things and solving problems: if you'd like someone to prototype your design, I've got an NGO at my disposal with funding and talent and time and materials to give it a go.
Yeah J4jonian. Those names you offered will have a great chance, ___ about as great as Howard Hughes.
~SIOUXROSE~ I've invented a wind powered generator system that's more than twice as effecitve as any now being developed or used. Just have it on paper though. An idea ___ but based upon known science.
Death control is the humane thing as long as its balanced by birth control. If not, nature takes over its dog eat dog. You forgot family planning.
Why don't we do these things?
Perhaps it is the inertia of imperialism that is most prosperous when there are wars. Lets also not forget that our standard of living for a good long while now is based on exploiting poor countries and on a war based economy.
Many posts on this site seem convinced that a serious depression is inevitable....maybe not perhaps it is money at the top with no where to go as the eonomist Krugman of the NewYork times suggests.
The world economy is tied to the mechanism of growth that must accelerate to remain viable. Perhaps what is missing is a new economic model that does in fact address third world problems and deals with resources that are finite and war like the "war on terror' an infinite possibility I guess....to whit this verse:
F you Capitalism
Free Market Capitalism has won the day,
Just another ism done got away.
The marks are us wouldn't you say
As Corp world soft world leads the way
It's hard-on wars, space wars, oil wars, overcome the evil one wars
They 's all good wars
for
War is good
And war is great
And we thank you for our fate
Ain't it just lookin for another date?
Hey has that apple got a date, a logo, or a sorry it's too late?
Could it make American pie
How about MIC stick pire pie
Yah get our latest killer jets and tanks
Corp world just says thanks oh thanks
Don't forget our latest smart bombs colored just like yellow food drops.
Cause it's Corporation world military goods world,
You're the trillion dollar a year good world
That's just too good to go away
We're just and good… just and good… for our war is just and good so:
Star wars, space wars, oil wars, overcome the evil one wars
They is all good wars for:
War is good and war is great and Ameriwar is the best,
and we thank you for our fate
That's still looking for a mate.
They need bombs not bread, just a little collateral dead
That's moral clarity and bushy pre-emptive charity
For corporate profit good corporate profit good
Just buy more jets and tanks
we work for corp world so we'll all say thanks
For war is good and war is great and thank you for our food,
and our posh and fancy fenced in nest
amen world
corp world
amen world amen
Hey, what's the problem? It isn't like we're actually paying for this! We've done it all with massive budget deficits, with money borrowed from foreigners (primarily the Chinese) and the interest will be borne by our children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren ad infinitum. This is the subprime war! Bush, Cheney, Hillary and the rest of the hawks will be long dead when the bills come due and their descendants can live the high life in Monaco or the Caymans (if the rising oceans don't drown them) on their trust funds.
'the war in iraq has cost american taxpayers nearly 500 billion'
and has cost the iraqis more than mere dollars - their lives, their families, their homes, their future.................
To Kem Patrick in the first comment I say 2 short words: Dennis Kucinich...er, make that 4 short words: Dennis Kucinich or Cynthia McKinney. alright that's 5 words. And Ron Paul. OK...Amongst the words I want to say to Kem Patrick are such diverse elements as Dennis Kucinich, Cynthia...anyway, you get the idea.
I am getting tired of hearing all of the things we COULD have done with the two trillion because, if I am not mistaknen, we are borrowing this money. WOULD we have borrowed it to do all those good things? I think not. War is a great way of scaring our government into freeing up a whole lot of cash to funnel into the coffers of a lot of well-connected corporations.
When you count all the costs (of just those things on which you can put a cost), the obligations incurred are already past the $3 trillion mark.
Is Vicki what is called a "troll"?
"The implications of this cannot be underestimated. It means that a better and more just world is far from within reach, if we are willing to shift our priorities."
As much as i join them in their pessimism, i think the authors meant
"is far from being out of reach" or possibly "is within reach". I've informed Common Dreams but i'm thinking of starting to charge for this service.
At least they didn't say it cannot be misunderestimated...
Hmmm..... Toronto Star; as in Canada? Vast oil reserves, diamond mines, gold and other mineral deposits. Why don't you stop watching Hockey for a while and go out and spend your capital to save the world instead of kissing up to Bush! AAAAY?
The author failed to mention that a fraction of the fiscal treasure wasted on this war could have funded THE new Manhattan Project that would put brilliant minds together to come up with the NEXT innovative energy force. No one knew about electricity till Edison recognized something "mysterious" in the air. Same thing with steam engine and nuclear power. It all begins with an idea, and while right now we wonder if there's time to implement new technologies, EARTH MOTHER is making quite clear what the alternative (non-action) would be.
The other thing that is not spoken of in this "accounting" is the intangible loss of all those lives, our own troops and the innocents, a million and counting who were born to the fate of a troubled land, a land bequeathed with Arab wealth terms "a soft loan from Allah." Who is to say that among the numbers of the dead might not have walked the next Mozart or Shakespeare or Einstein? A legacy has been lost, a people aborted, and who has most supported this policy of obliteration, quite a few come from the evangelical 'christian' ranks. Seems to me these people really do NEED a meeting with Jesus.
Vicki's the Church Lady!
Being the richest and technologically most developed country in the world is too much of a temptation for any human being. Power corrupts and huge, barely limited power corrupts in the same ways; witness Bush and its potential successor. Imperialistic policies follow; first abroad, then, as some people realize its inconsistencies, at home. Thus, extreme size is the enemy of democracy. This won't change regardless of who is elected president. The only salvation for US democracy is breaking the country up into seven or eight rich, smaller, hopefully decent countries. Whoever does not consider this a possible solution is by definition a republican. This makes most Americans republicans at heart, regardless of their political affiliation!!!
DUH-FACTOR 10 // CODE BLUE, HOW & WHY--ENEMIES DOMESTIC, REDSTATE-HANDED
Major-League BIGtime INTRUDER ALERT
--ON SCREEN:
http://www.sfbg.com/blogs/politics/2007/08/political_art_of_the_week.html
Vicki January 21st, 2008 2:59 pm:
"You mention all those things that could have been achieved as if they are universal goals that all humans would regard as good and moving toward a more perfect world."
Vicki, You are joking right? Which of these goals do you and the Republicans/Democrats disagree with?
Eliminating extreme poverty? Achieving universal literacy? Immunizing children? Fighting AIDS?
So why isn't it being done? The money is there, at least what is left after the neocon Iraq fiasco.
Do you worship Lucifer? That is your business. I on the other hand would like to know why the "Duopoly" in congress is against meeting these goals.
You mention all those things that could have been achieved as if they are universal goals that all humans would regard as good and moving toward a more perfect world. Oh, I get it. Republicans, neocons and Bush are really not humans but evil demons because I seriously doubt that any Republicans would want to see any of those goals achieved. Rather, they want to see the misery continue and compounded, more starvation, sickness, death, poverty, illiteracy, ignorancem racism and hatred in the world, in short, in service to their real master, Bealzelbub, Lucifer, Satan also known as the Devil. Then again, given the happy complicity of Hillary, Pelosi, Reid and other Democrats, pretty obvious that the Demopublicans both worship and love Darkness.
J Locke has it right. Americans don't see why they should help others out of poverty since they lifted themselves out of poverty on their own during the depression. Americans want nothing to do with the world and would rather it disappear since it is constantly attacking them. If the world outside the US would disappear, America could live happily everafter.
Now consider this: Department of Defense? The United States has never been attacked. It always sruck first or false-flagged it. Yet the people see the world as evil and themselves as good. Is that funny or what?
WARGONE COLLU$ION: TRUTH TO POWER--WON'T ASK, WON'T TELL...
~COCKS OF THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL-$TRENGTH 'CAKEWALK'
TO THE GATE$ OF HELL~
(They Also Betray Us, Who Only Strut & Peck...)
HOME TO ROOST: The most disgraceful contribution to combat-vernacular on record:
"Hillbilly Armor"...(THINK about it)
And THIS: That (thus far) we can't even, as a Nation, "Ask" this "Wealthiest War Cabinet on the Most Chickenhawked Warpath in American History" to "Answer"
a simple "yes" or "no" question:
will you agree to "Recu$e" yourselves "for life" from any personal profit ("exposed" or "discovered") demonstrably connected to any bloodshed on your watch?
("Radical Ethics: No Bucks From War" / Seattle P-I--see "Politics" @ http://artistgeneral.com )
THAT WE CAN'T EVEN YET BRING OURSELVES TO BROACH THE SUBJECT
...speaks pathetic volumes indeed. Maybe afterall such spineless fatuity is reaping its justly bitter harvest.
Chickenhawks, bobble-headed Hou$e Bushelzetoxicated Chickenhawks...bawkin' & cacklin', Vision-Thingin' IRAN.
Multi-millionaire CHICKENHAWKS. Seedcorn-fed, Offshore-loophole Cronyiated, backboneless DEM-intimidatin' (?!!)CHICKENhawk$...
how much more "gently" will we go into their Good NIGHT?
"In other words, for a cost of $156.3 billion this year alone - less than a tenth of the total Iraq war budget - we could lift entire countries out of poverty, teach every person in the world to read and write, significantly reduce child mortality, while making huge leaps in the battle against AIDS, saving millions of lives."
True but I think Americans, rather than save money and do all this, prefer to be spectators of the great game to replace one set of multimillionaire rulers with another. It's funny how they don't vote for the people that care about these things.
...was and still is religiously driven. Our Jesus is more Godly than your Mohammed or visa versa. Gotta prove it, gotta make them see,.....what a perfect pair of patsies for the world dominators,.... and the congregation goes amen or ala rac or shabu dada or something incredibaly harmonious like that.
The Devil needs souls, don't forget who runs the show here. And if you are tired of it, fight it, take it easy on the joints this time though, they tend to distract otherwise good intentions.
If everyone can read, who will the slaves be?
Who will pave the streets of gold?
Let alone what the US could achieve domestically with a simple and permanent redirection of funds from causing death to embracing life and its goods: medical research (DIABETES, cancer, heart disease); educational infusions and innovations (music, art, humanities, and science progams at every level that would be the envy of the world); sustainable energy, equitable business models, renewed infrastructure, etc, etc. What a waste!
And we in Massachusetts thought the Big Dig was bad! We do we let this happen? How can we stop it? What is wrong with these men!
*snicker*
'A fool and his money are soon parted.'
Have fun as the about to break tidal wave of recession hammers the crap out of the US and world economy.
It will be interseting to see if Bushco actually tries to attack Iran and kickstart the US economy one more time with a war. An economy that, if you will pardon the analogy, is running on fumes.
No use saying "IF" now, the Genie is out of the bottle. The Iraq and Afganistan disaster will continue for many more years, even IF and when we have a different president, (unless it's John Edwards). The occupation and the costs of the stupidity will continue until we have the depression that is ready to burst out and do us Americans in.
IT IS THE PEOPLE WHO MUST BE CHANGED, NOT THE GOVERNMENT.