Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
A New,Global Oil Quandary: Costly Fuel Means Costly Calories
KUANTAN, Malaysia - Rising prices for cooking oil are forcing residents of Asia's largest slum, in Mumbai, India, to ration every drop. Bakeries in the United States are fretting over higher shortening costs. And here in Malaysia, brand-new factories built to convert vegetable oil into diesel sit idle, their owners unable to afford the raw material. This is the other oil shock. From India to Indiana, shortages and soaring prices for palm oil, soybean oil and many other types of vegetable oils are the latest, most striking example of a developing global problem: costly food.
The food price index of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, based on export prices for 60 internationally traded foodstuffs, climbed 37 percent last year. That was on top of a 14 percent increase in 2006, and the trend has accelerated this winter.
In some poor countries, desperation is taking hold. Just in the last week, protests have erupted in Pakistan over wheat shortages, and in Indonesia over soybean shortages. Egypt has banned rice exports to keep food at home, and China has put price controls on cooking oil, grain, meat, milk and eggs.
According to the F.A.O., food riots have erupted in recent months in Guinea, Mauritania, Mexico, Morocco, Senegal, Uzbekistan and Yemen.
"The urban poor, the rural landless and small and marginal farmers stand to lose," said He Changchui, the agency's chief representative for Asia and the Pacific.
A startling change is unfolding in the world's food markets. Soaring fuel prices have altered the equation for growing food and transporting it across the globe. Huge demand for biofuels has created tension between using land to produce fuel and using it for food.
A growing middle class in the developing world is demanding more protein, from pork and hamburgers to chicken and ice cream. And all this is happening even as global climate change may be starting to make it harder to grow food in some of the places best equipped to do so, like Australia.
In the last few years, world demand for crops and meat has been rising sharply. It remains an open question how and when the supply will catch up. For the foreseeable future, that probably means higher prices at the grocery store and fatter paychecks for farmers of major crops like corn, wheat and soybeans.
There may be worse inflation to come. Food experts say steep increases in commodity prices have not fully made their way to street stalls in the developing world or supermarkets in the West.
Governments in many poor countries have tried to respond by stepping up food subsidies, imposing or tightening price controls, restricting exports and cutting food import duties.
These temporary measures are already breaking down. Across Southeast Asia, for example, families have been hoarding palm oil. Smugglers have been bidding up prices as they move the oil from more subsidized markets, like Malaysia's, to less subsidized markets, like Singapore's.
No category of food prices has risen as quickly this winter as so-called edible oils - with sometimes tragic results. When a Carrefour store in Chongqing, China, announced a limited-time cooking oil promotion in November, a stampede of would-be buyers left 3 people dead and 31 injured.
Cooking oil may seem a trifling expense in the West. But in the developing world, cooking oil is an important source of calories and represents one of the biggest cash outlays for poor families, which grow much of their own food but have to buy oil in which to cook it.
Few crops illustrate the emerging problems in the global food chain as well as palm oil, a vital commodity in much of the world and particularly Asia. From jungles and street markets in Southeast Asia to food companies in the United States and biodiesel factories in Europe, soaring prices for the oil are drawing environmentalists, energy companies, consumers, indigenous peoples and governments into acrimonious disputes.
The oil palm is a stout-trunked tree with a spray of frilly fronds at the top that make it look like an enormous sea anemone. The trees, with their distinctive, star-like patterns of leaves, cover an eighth of the entire land area of Malaysia and even greater acreage in nearby Indonesia.
An Efficient Producer
The palm is a highly efficient producer of vegetable oil, squeezed from the tree's thick bunches of plum-size bright red fruit. An acre of oil palms yields as much oil as eight acres of soybeans, the main rival for oil palms; rapeseed, used to make canola oil, is a distant third. Among major crops, only sugar cane comes close to rivaling oil palms in calories of human food per acre.
Palm oil prices have jumped nearly 70 percent in the last year because supply has grown slowly while demand has soared.
Farmers and plantation companies are responding to the higher prices, clearing hundreds of thousands of acres of tropical forest to replant with rows of oil palms. But an oil palm takes eight years to reach full production. A drought last year in Indonesia and flooding in Peninsular Malaysia helped constrain supply. Worldwide palm oil output climbed just 2.7 percent last year, to 42.1 million tons.
At the same time, palm oil demand is growing steeply for a variety of reasons around the globe. They include shifting decisions among farmers about what to plant, rising consumer demand in China and India for edible oils, and Western subsidies for biofuel production.
American farmers have been planting more corn and less soy because demand for corn-based ethanol has pushed up corn prices. American soybean acreage plunged 19 percent last year, producing a drop in soybean oil output and inventories.
Chinese farmers also cut back soybean acreage last year, as urban sprawl covered prime farmland and the Chinese government provided more incentives for grain.
Yet people in China are also consuming more oils. China not only was the world's biggest palm oil importer last year, holding steady at 5.2 million tons in the first 11 months of the year, but it also doubled its soybean oil imports to 2.9 million tons, forcing buyers elsewhere to switch to palm oil.
Concerns about nutrition used to hurt palm oil sales, but they are now starting to help. The oil was long regarded in the West as unhealthy, but it has become an attractive option to replace the chemically altered fats known as trans fats, which have lately come to be seen as the least healthy of all fats.
New York City banned trans fats in frying at food service establishments last summer and will ban them in bakery goods this summer. Across the country, manufacturers are trying to replace trans fats. American palm oil imports nearly doubled in the first 11 months of last year, rising by 200,000 tons.
"Four years ago, when this whole no-trans issue started, we processed no palm here," said Mark Weyland, a United States product manager for Loders Croklaan, a Dutch company that supplies palm oil. "Now it's our biggest seller."
Last year, conversion of palm oil into fuel was a fast-growing source of demand, but in recent weeks, rising prices have thrown that business into turmoil.
Here on Malaysia's eastern shore, a series of 45-foot-high green and gray storage tanks connect to a labyrinth of yellow and silver pipes. The gleaming new refinery has the capacity to turn 116,000 tons a year of palm oil into 110,000 tons of a fuel called biodiesel, as well as valuable byproducts like glycerin. Mission Biofuels, an Australian company, finished the refinery last month and is working on an even larger factory next door at the base of a jungle hillside.
But prices have spiked so much that the company cannot cover all its costs and has idled the finished refinery while looking for a new strategy, such as asking a biodiesel buyer to pay a price linked to palm oil costs, and someday switching from palm oil to jatropha, a roadside weed.
"We took a view that palm oil prices were already high; we didn't think they could go even higher, and then they did," said Nathan Mahalingam, the company's managing director.
Growth in Biofuels
Biofuels accounted for almost half the increase in worldwide demand for vegetable oils last year, and represented 7 percent of total consumption of the oils, according to Oil World, a forecasting service in Hamburg, Germany.
The growth of biodiesel, which can be mixed with regular diesel, has been controversial, not only because it competes with food uses of oil but also because of environmental concerns. European conservation groups have been warning that tropical forests are being leveled to make way for oil palm plantations, destroying habitat for orangutans and Sumatran rhinoceroses while also releasing greenhouse gases.
The European Union has moved to restrict imports of palm oil grown in unsustainable ways. The measure has incensed the Malaysian palm oil industry, which had plunged into biofuel production in part to satisfy European demand.
Another controversy involves the treatment of indigenous peoples whose lands have been seized by oil plantations. This has been a particular issue on Borneo.
Anne B. Lasimbang, executive director of the Pacos Trust in the Malaysian state of Sabah in northern Borneo, said that while some indigenous people had benefited from selling palm oil that they grow themselves, many had lost ancestral lands with little to show for it, including lands that used to provide habitats for endangered orangutans.
"Finally, some of the pressures internationally have trickled down. Some of the companies are more open to dialogue; they want to talk to communities," said Ms. Lasimbang, a member of the Dusun indigenous group. "On our side, we are still suspicious."
Demand Outstrips Supply
As the multiple conflicts and economic pressures associated with palm oil play out in the global economy, the bottom line seems to be that the world wants more of the oil than it can get.
Even in Malaysia, the center of the global palm oil industry for half a century, spot shortages have cropped up. Recently, as wholesale prices soared, cooking oil refiners complained of inadequate subsidies and cut back production of household oil, sold at low, regulated prices.
Street vendors in the capital, Kuala Lumpur, complain that they cannot find enough cooking oil to prepare roti canai, the flatbread that is the national snack. "It's very difficult; it's hard to find," said one vendor who gave only his first name, Palani, after admitting that he was secretly buying cooking oil intended for households instead of paying the much higher price for commercial use.
Many of the hardest-hit victims of rising food prices are in the vast slums that surround cities in poorer Asian nations. The Kawle family in Mumbai's sprawling Dharavi slum, a household of nine with just one member working as a laborer for $60 a month, is coping with recent price increases for palm oil.
The family has responded by eating fish once a week instead of twice, seldom cooking vegetables and cutting its monthly rice consumption. Next to go will be the weekly smidgen of lamb.
"If the prices go up again," said Janaron Kawle, the family patriarch, "we'll cut the mutton to twice a month and use less oil."
Contributing reporting were Andrew Martin in New York, Anand Giridharadas in Kale, India, and Michael Rubenstein in Mumbai.
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company

30 Comments so far
Show AllBlaming the victim is not a good strategy for a solution. These people are like the canary in the mine shaft. They are the early warning system. Wisdom would suggest at we make changes now to ease their suffering and by so doing we just might stop the food shortages before they stalks us.
People are starving and this group recommends they become vegetarian or boil their food.
What this article is REALLY about is that the West and the Rich have chosen Cars over People.
"If the prices go up again," said Janaron Kawle, the family patriarch, "we'll cut the mutton to twice a month and use less oil."
**cut out the mutton completely and go vegetarian and the world will be better for it.
The article didnt talk about the wasted water and crops that go to feed livestock.
Bad bad bad.
Has the CIA considered rendering Corporate Fat Cats?
This crisis underscores the dangerous course which the world is heading--and things can only worsen until urgent environmental reforms are implemented. This includes effective family planning; global warming mitigation measures through fuel conservation & development of alternative renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, & tidal; cessation of our shameful waste of resources; and the list goes on.
These vital reforms have been stalled through unprecedented blockage of essential environmental and social reform measures &, fabricated science, by this reckless administration & their radical right wing supporters. As the most influential nation on earth we have the duty to set the world course toward avoiding the inevitable world suffering and related problems.
If Americans continue to stand by while abusive zealot encourages world suffering-- then we must assume blame for the impending consequences.
Now if only the author(s) of this article would realize that there indeed is an oil that does not deplete the soil, yields more energy, does not contribute to global warming, and can get us of our dependence on foreign oil, they would be fighting for it. When you're finishing being rendered powerless by the above article, visit this site for a change and start fighting for the real solution to this mess:
http://www.hempworld.com/Hemp-CyberFarm_com/htms/hemp-products/bio-diesel/bio-diesel.html
P.S.: And don't let the fuckers who complain about "pot smokers" get in your way. The war on drugs is what got us all fucked in the first place.
http://belize1.com/BzLibrary/trust512.html
Greed and cupidity leads to stupidity.
I wrote an article on the subject when the report came out that biofuels cost over twice the carbon debt than they save, because the cookers are oil or coal fired. Of course Big Oil and Big Coal and some of the agribusiness giants immediately bought up the grain futures. The stand to make money both ways, while millions starve because their agricultural fields are converted to biofuel production. That increases the use of coal and oil to produce the biofuel. A win-win for the corporatocracy, lose-lose for humanity, as usual.
Meanwhile, forests, which trap carbon and release oxygen into the atmosphere are being cut down to make room for more biofuel fields.
Frankly, unless we throw the bastards out and start working for the good of humanity, soon, we are doomed as a species, and possibly all animate denizens of the earth.
I sometimes wonder if the tube worms, etc., that grow near the volcanic vents in the deeps aren't the future. They don't use our carbon-nitrogen-oxygen cycle to exist. The conditions down there are closer to that of Venus. Who knows?
Scant wonder why Shultz is corporatism's favorite "Lefty" talker, but Ed hasn't been pushing the bio-fuel stuff much lately ......... scant wonder why.
Kelmer makes a good point above and I wish to make another. Smart people throughout the world have learned that it pays to buy the highest quality available and start you own garden plots.
Buying organic whole grains and produce, non-gmo foods and non-hormoned dairy products, and canned goods which are their non-toxicly processed and stored costs astronomically more until you learn that you can survive on much less of better quality foods than the mass produced agri-business McBellyfill with which most developed country's citizens have been stuffing their faces.
Less can be more if you know how to do it.
I KNEW I'd see the term "food-riots" in the NYT this-year...I just figured LATER this-Year (like after Nov.4).
How many months/years, do you think, before such Rioting will be on US-soil?
[Can you IMAGINE fat-assed Americans -- rioting over Food...in an 'urban-center' near-you? Don't get between them and a McD's!!]
Learn to garden, people (non-Hybrid/non-GM/'Seeding'-stock) -- and buddy-up with a local-Farmer (if you can find one who is NOT up-to-neck in Hock, and soon to be a Rioter-himself...).
[Hint...you can live on chickpeas/Hummus, if you can afford the wheat for a little-bread to 'go-with'...and, within a year, you'll feel good-enough to be grateful the Rioters closed-down the McD's...!]
Burning food to keep from walking. Who came up with that brilliant idea?
The 'brilliant idea' is just part of this:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7693
What your next-Admin (of either-'Party') will be doing in your-name [while they, and only-They, 'profit'].
After-all, they 'most deserve to live/profit', right? And this Planet has lots-of-"scarcity" and just TOO-MANY 'peoples' on it...and atop of 'our' Resources!
Ask Bush/Cheney, or Gore and his new environmentalist-pal, Nathaniel DeRothschild, or maybe ex-Rhodes-Scholar Clinton and his neo-buddy, ex-CIA/Skull Bush-41 (or his Wifey, probably our next Mass-Murderer-in-Chief -- or is that 'chieftess'?)...
Millions-starved in India in the late-1800's, also (when the 'wonderful trains the Brit's gifted those backwards-people with' then hauled-away all their food to ship it to England -- but that was back well-before the British-Empire ostensibly passed their 'baton' to US for a "New American Century").
[I don't know how long I can tread-water, exactly, but I damn-well know a Century is a LONG, long time between-meals!]
"The article didnt talk about the wasted water and crops that go to feed livestock"
Not 'wasted' -- if captured, all that escaping-methane will be at LEAST as practical and efficacious an approach to solving our 'energy-crisis' as Big-Oil/Defense running Nuke-Plants or these food-crop Bio-fuels and/or 'ethanol'...
"Has the CIA considered rendering Corporate Fat Cats?"
In case you'd not-heard, the CIA was formed for-and-from Wall-Street fat-cats, whose 'Job#1' WAS "to render UNTO corporate fat-cats". Over their door they say "The Truth shall set you Free" -- unlike the Mossad who say "By Way of Deception" or the classy-Brit's whose MI-6 says "Semper Occultus" -- all, by the way, are technically-correct, but the CIA's is a warning to 'those who work within'...
"If Americans continue to stand by while abusive zealot encourages world suffering– then we must assume blame for the impending consequences."
Blame? Hell, we're already 'bragging it up' -- what do you mean 'blame'?
Instead of going to see Rambo-II/Redeux this week, rent Rambo-III -- the CIA and Amercican politicians haven't even stopped bragging about their 'successful' "Afghanistan-Campaign" yet...[I mean Afghanistan-I, NOT Afghanistan-II!].
cooking oil is an important source of calories and represents one of the biggest cash outlays for poor families, which grow much of their own food but have to buy oil in which to cook it.
Cooking oil is like petroleum, a strategy for mass addiction/dependency on capital. Oil is not necessary for cooking and is highly destructive to human health. Both the oil and the food rise to temperatures in which the fats convert to dangerous trans-fats and various carcinogens are formed. Far better to boil the food, even better to steam it, and best to simply eat it raw after sprouting seeds. Oily salad dressings may be made from avocado, coconut, oil palm fruit, seeds/nuts. If one must use oil, get cold pressed, and apply to food after heat is removed.
An acre of oil palms yields as much oil as eight acres of soybeans, the main rival for oil palms; rapeseed, used to make canola oil, is a distant third.
According to journeytoforever.org, soybean oil lbs/acre is 335, and oil palm 4465, or thirteen times soybean. Rapeseed yields 893, or 2.6 times the soybean. Another twenty crops yield between soybean's and oil palm, with coconut, avocado, brazil, macadamia, pecan and olive above rapeseed. The perennial crops yield without the enormous commercial inputs that corn/soybeans require for their stated yields.
The growth of biodiesel ... has been controversial
What's controversial is mindless greedy capitalist exploitation of biodiesel. Biodiesel is the zero-carbon fuel of choice for low volume independent production/consumption.
Only rent Rambo-II if, like BushCo&friends, you now believe that we could/should have 'won' the Vietnam-War -- just like we are now 'winning' in Iraq (why we now have lots of their 'cheap-Oil' driving-down fuel-costs, and have finally won-over their "Hearts and Minds", apparently)?
i don't understand what the big deal with cooking oil is. i hardly use the stuff. one bottle lasts me like forever.
i figure the foods i cook have natural oils in them, you just have to be patient enough for them to be released in the cooking process.
this is very strange.
Well, hellodarling, the big deal is that in many parts of the world those few extra calories from fats, be they animal or vegetable in origin, are often the difference between good and ill health.
Coal is filthy stuff to burn, bio-fuels run up the cost of foodstuffs, natural gas, a comparitivily clean burning and cheap(in the U.S.) is being used primarily for industry and if used for autos like oil would become very expensive, solar is not cheap enough for the mass of people - so I ask all of you "Whats left?". Don't tell me about reducing lifestyles because it won't happen short of a world financial catastrophe. Unlike many on this thread I do not see a financial catastrophe in the cards (some here seem to think it would be a cleansing event like a colon-wash).
Nuclear energy is the only answer. Natural gas is cheap by most current energy standards at seven cents a KwH but Nuclear is two cents a KwH. If plutonium is recycled as is done in most modern plants the waste for a family of four over a period of twenty years would fit in a shot-glass. But it's going to happen not because it's logical but because the public will demand it eventually as oil and gas prices soar.
Barn Burner: You foolishly propose nuclear energy as the only answer. I have some counterpoints for you.
How do you extract and process the uranium to fuel the reactors? Where do you store the expended fuel rods, which will remain radioactive for the next 50 000 or so years?
oops.
Idiot.
"Burning food to keep from walking. Who came up with that brilliant idea?"
That's actually one of the most sensible statements/questions one can make.
What's needed (or will be in the near future) is a radical re-thinking of how we live our lives within a finite system. We must let go of our wasteful ways and live as if there is a tomorrow.
I'm looking at permaculture to help me find a way.
Iammyself: Good to have you aboard! Permaculture is about the only way we haven't tried! As a society I mean.
The real bitch of it is, so much of the North American population, and most of the technological world for that matter, will be forced by circumstance to adopt permaculture. The days of a vacation in the south of France will be gone the way of the dodo.
M.K. Hubbart was right.
In a mad pursuit of energy we consume every source for mankind's benefit.
In one end and out the other; it is converted into less desirable forms of biomass.
Energy cannot be created or destroyed; it just reacts with oxygen and breaks down and mixes in the atmosphere. Vegetable oil is less toxic than burning petroleum!
It is also renewable! If we want to run our cars on liquid fuel, this is the best way I can think of; using energy stored in plants.
The problem is there are too many people on the planet wanting to live our lifestyle!
Shortages? Hell Yea! That says demand has gone up for renewables, and possibly the shortage is being twisted by industry to increase profit.
I read years ago that if we want everyone on the planet to live the American lifestyle, the global human population needs to be less than (2,000,000,000)!
We're now at 6,700,000,000 and counting. I know that in Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan, and Congo we are doing what we can... There's also the epidemic of starvation throughout sub-Saharan Africa... I cannot call any of these satisfactory solutions for those directly involved.
The American way of life must be negotiable! I cannot see any fair, reasonable, or just way for Americans to keep their cars. Car owners on the rest of the planet will have to give up theirs, too.
For thousands of years, man tilled the soil and raised his crops. His animals manured the fields. He learned to rotate his crops and to leave a field to lie fallow every few years. The land supported him for thousands of years.
Now, we have learnt about nitrates. We have expensive artificial fertilizers to dump on the fields by the ton. We tend to forget that nitrates are salts and so are gradually salinizing our croplands. Cow poop is now a toxic waste, to be stored under plastic, then hauled to toxic waste dumps out in the desert somewhere. Now we are into GM foods, which do not reproduce, so the farmer has to go to big chem to buy his seeds for next year. The small farmer is absorbed and spit out by monster agrifarms, and biofuels are the latest thing. Disaster doesn't loom in the distance, it is like a rapidly approaching tsunami, towering over us and about to break.
Shokulan: THe Union of concerned Scientists worked out what we would need if every person on Earth lived in the North American lifestyle.
Another 6.5 Earths.
oops
I'm already cutting back. Are you ready to?
"My father rode a camel. I drive a Rolls-Royce. My son flies a commercial jet. His son will ride a camel."
-Modern Arab proverb
When the civilized finally admit that there is no substitute for fossil fuels, that they're finite, and that we must learn to live without them, the rest of us might finally get a chance to create a better world.
Here's hoping...
Galen,
If you want to know how many Earths it will take for everyone to live at your current standard of living, check out www.myfootprint.org. It's a bit simplistic, but effective.
Sorry, the link wasn't quite correct.
It's www.myfootprint.org
Galen,
concerning petrol oil yesterday you quoted one expert, mr Hubbard as the truth teller on "peak oil" and that there was no real new discovered oil.
if you want to checkup on "peak oil", just google "new discovered oil".