Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
- Accidentally Released - and Incredibly Embarrassing - Documents Show How Goldman et al Engaged in 'Naked Short Selling'
- Apocalypse Fairly Soon: The Moment of Truth in Europe
- NDAA's 'Indefinite Detention' Provisions Unconstitutional, says Judge
- Preying on Poverty: How Government and Corporations Use the Poor as Piggy Banks
- Associated Press Calls Out Romney's Lies in 'Prairie Fire' Speech
- Accidentally Released - and Incredibly Embarrassing - Documents Show How Goldman et al Engaged in 'Naked Short Selling'
- The Rise of the New Economy Movement
- Preying on Poverty: How Government and Corporations Use the Poor as Piggy Banks
- The Organic Watergate: Alarming Report Reveals USDA's Cozy Relationship with Corporate Agribusinesses in 'Organics'
- Updated: Under Pressure, TED Releases 'Income Inequality' Talk
Popular content
Today's Top News
Congress Should Investigate Release of Pentagon Iran Video
The story that the Pentagon presented to the world through the news media a week ago about the naval encounter with Iran in the Straits of Hormuz has now largely unraveled. We now know the following:
- the audio threats that appeared on the Pentagon video were spliced in.
- the Pentagon cannot say where the threats came from.
- it is now almost certain that the audio threats did not come from the Iranian boats. The radio channel on which the threat was picked up is well-known to contain "heckling" by unknown parties. The audio doesn't have the noise that one would expect if it came from the moving Iranian boats. Farsi speakers and Iranians told the Washington Post the voice did not sound Iranian. (This was all reported last week.)
- it is not true that the U.S. was "about to fire" on the Iranian boats.
- whatever happened, it appears to not have been at all unprecedented in terms of naval encounters between the U.S. and Iran, and the immediate U.S. reaction following the incident suggests it was not initially perceived as being out of the ordinary. (These assertions are documented here.)
Therefore, a reasonable conclusion, based on what we now know, is that this was a manufactured incident, in the sense that the account that the Pentagon presented to the world through the media was significantly false, and they knew or should have known that it was significantly false when they presented it.
A further reasonable conclusion is that the motivation for releasing the video was to ratchet up tensions prior to President Bush's trip to the Middle East, whose purpose appears to have been to clarify that the release of the National Intelligence Estimate on Iran did not indicate any change in U.S. policy towards Iran -- the U.S. was still committed to confrontation -- and to try to prevent or reduce moves by the Arab allies of the US towards rapprochement with Iran.
The key questions that remain: who at the Pentagon authorized the release of the video, which we now know gave a false account? Who authorized false statements to the media? What procedures are in place to prevent the Pentagon from releasing false information to news media about military encounters between the United States and Iran (or anyone else?) What procedures should be put in place to prevent this from happening in the future?
There shouldn't be any doubt that Congress should prevent this from happening and that it can do so if it has the will. It is unacceptable that the Pentagon can release false information that makes military conflict more likely, thus hijacking democratic accountability at the great risk of blood and treasure, and greatly damaging the credibility of the U.S. government, at home and abroad. It is likely that there would never have been a new Iran intelligence estimate if it had not been for Congressional pressure and the reforms that were implemented after the White House manipulated intelligence prior to the invasion of Iraq. If Congress could create the conditions in which the new Iran intelligence estimate was released in spite of the strong opposition of the White House, it can create the conditions in which the Pentagon cannot release significantly false information about military encounters to the news media.
Ask Congress to investigate the release of the Iran video.
Robert Naiman is Senior Policy Analyst and National Coordinator at Just Foreign Policy

26 Comments so far
Show AllJust as the regime of Saddam Hussein was more than one man and it was a network of people in the governement and in Iraq..so too the Bush administration is a network of people within the US and its government.
Even with impeachment and even with a new president..that network is still in place. An investigation would show who are the people who would engage in these kinds of lies for war.
The problems within the US government are now systemic in my opinion and it will take system wide solutions to solve the problems. These people break laws and should be uncovered and removed from office.
Bush still has support within the US government for his agenda of war and those people will lie and break laws.
Just what we need, another congressional investigation. It would be really great to actually have some accountability in this country but the congress could not find it's own ass with both hands. Spending more money, more time and getting more headlines has proven to be utterly worthless with this congress. We all thought things would improve after elections 2006, they haven't!!!
In working democracies, the military is counted on to tell the truth to the public. Lying or "spinning" as you call it is left to the elected politicians. This avoids us having to show senior military management the door every time there is a change of government in order for them to be replaced with political hacks of the right stripe.
The senior military people, like the rest of the civil servants, pride themselves with putting the interests of their country above politics. They understand that if the people lose faith in their military's integrity, there is corrosion in the foundation of democracy and democracy is one of the things we deem worth fighting for.
Congress should do a lot of things - but we all know it won't.
Isn't Gen. Petreaus a "senior military" person?
Naiveté comes with a price I don't want to have to suffer.
we don't need another stupid congressional investigation that tells us what we've known for years-- that the Bush admin is a lying bunch of thugs and thieves. We don't need another investigation that will lead to no consequences, to no one being held accountable. We don't need to sit through another month of hearings after which nothing will be done and nothing will change. We don't need another reminder that the rule of law is a vanished dream, and our rulers, like the kings of old, are above the law because they ARE the law. It's the law of the bully- he with the biggest stick wins. No we DO NOT NEED MORE REMINDERS OF THIS>
As I said in another thread regarding impeachment, the fact that congress won't do anything is a much worse problem than whatever it is we are taking issue with (premeditated war, torture, etc.)
I worry less about this stuff being a fake (or not -- we may never know), and a lot more about Congress no longer being an independent branch of government.
Judging from the way Bush used the incident and propagandized in the Arab world that Iran is dangerous, it is obvious who planned the no-incident and authorized the release of it to coincide with Bush's Middle East trip to back up his sales pitch. The lying liars, the White House, of course. One does not have to be a genius to figure that one out.
"... another congressional investigation."
While we're investigating, the Bush administration will be spinning more tales, to be investigated later. Much later. Ok, probably never.
There will be little if any protest from the congressional dim [I prefer that spelling] leadership, much less an investigation.
Pelosi and Reid together--but Pelosi in particular--are the personification of appeasment. If the dims lose this slam-dunk election, and I feel fairly certain at present that they will, we can lay the blame squarely at the feet of these two sheep in wolves clothing.
We need this investigation. A REAL investigation. Impeach and discover everything.
I see alot of comments on the futility of an investigation by congress. If asking congress to investigate is pointless then what else can I do that is legal?
Its pretty obvious exactly which criminal administration around here is constantly busy lying, cooking up false pretenses, and generally abusing the public trust. Of which there is precious little left. Congress should wake its sorry ass up and treat these like the intolerable behaviors that they are. (Echoes up and down the barren halls of Congress....)
More investigations by Congress are not going to get any results. But that didn't stop me from clicking on the link and writing them anyway.
Impeachment is the only answer to restore the rule of law and the balance of power. Then, and only then, will we get any accountability. So, I'm supporting Rep. Wexler and his efforts to get Conyers to bring impeachment hearings against the Dick to the floor of the House. Call your hose congress critters. Tell 'em to honor their oath of office to defende and protect the constitution. The them that this is about the rule of law. Tell them that they have nothing that is more important to do than to have impeachment hearings. NOTHING!!!! Oh, and don't forget to give Nancy an ear full too. And Conyers. Here is a toll free number. Use it freely, every day and every week. Maybe they will do the right thing just to shut us up! Call 800-828-0498.
IMPEACH NOW!! Dickhead first
The new president's first cabinet appointee should be Robert Wexler as Attorney General, and the first Supreme Court appointee should be Patrick Leahy. We desperately need some integrity in our system of (in?)justice.
Why would you expect Congress to investigate when the Democrats actively support a war with Iran?
Isn't it clear by now that they don't care what you think? Show up with a big campaign check and they might listen to you. Even then, it won't be big enough to outweigh all the other campaign checks they've gotten from people who want them to protect Bush and Cheney from impeachment and keep them in office, and from all AIPAC types who want a war with Iran.
Please, give up on this silly notion that calling your congresscritter will change anything. They don't give a damn.
If you want to get their attention, kick them out of office. You've got to get out of the Democratic party and build another campaign that will kick this corrupt scum out of office. If you want to stop a war with Iran. If you want a congress that would actually uphold the law and the constitution and impeach a law-breaking President, then that's what you gotta do.
Sure, call them if it makes you feel better. But don't have any illusions that they'll listen to you and give a damn what you think.
"I see alot of comments on the futility of an investigation by congress. If asking congress to investigate is pointless then what else can I do that is legal?"
See above. Kick their sorry rears out of Congress.
"Pelosi and Reid together–but Pelosi in particular–are the personification of appeasment. If the dims lose this slam-dunk election, and I feel fairly certain at present that they will"
Actually, I think they'll win, unfortunately. My guess is the Evilcrats will control both houses of Congress and the White House after this election.
And it won't make a damn bit of difference. We'll still have troops dying in Iraq and Afghanistan. There will still be the same corporate pressure to attack Iran. And the Evilcrats who want to be President are falling all over themselves to see who can be the most warlike about trying to start yet another war in Pakistan.
If you want change, don't vote Democrat.
"Canada's foreign ministry has placed the United States and Israel on a watch list of nations where prisoners risk being tortured."
-Aljazeera
-BBC News
-Toronto Star
-Globe and Mail
-Canada.com
American values, eh?
It is bizarre for the military to claim they don't know where the 'Filipino Monkey' radio msgs came from. Even in the crude technology I used in the military decades ago enabled me to not only accurately locate the source of the transmission, but even get the radio fingerprint of the transmitter and often the operator as well.
I signed the petition calling for the investigation. (If you missed it click on Ask Congress at the end of the article)
It may be that no impeachement is ongoing because of fears of the divides in the military and in the Pentagon.
The people who would lie the US into war should be removed from power.
The NIE report was extremely important and has weakened Cheney's ability to call Iran a serious imminent threat and to quote from the article:
"It is likely that there would never have been a new Iran intelligence estimate if it had not been for Congressional pressure and the reforms that were implemented after the White House manipulated intelligence prior to the invasion of Iraq. If Congress could create the conditions in which the new Iran intelligence estimate was released in spite of the strong opposition of the White House, it can create the conditions in which the Pentagon cannot release significantly false information about military encounters to the news media."
How much effort does it take to sign a petition?
Turns out the real "tape" of the "incident" in the Strait of Hormuz reveals Jessica Lynch was being held captive in the back of one of the Iranian boats and Pat Tillman's ghost attempted to rescue her but was thwarted by a gang of Filipino terrorist monkeys who hate our cheap bananas.
Damn Islamofascist monkeys and their anti-freedom agenda!
I'd have more confidence in an investigation if Congress outsourced it.
I got an E-Mail from Robert Wexlar this morning telling me and asking for support for impeachment of Cheney. I signed his questionaire weeks ago but he needs the solid support of the nation before the likes of Pelosi and Conyers cave in.
As for that farce of the coast of Iran, did anybody in their right mind believe any of it when it was anounced.
Very funny Frank, if it wasn't true it would be regarded as mad.
Very poor quality video(grainy, jerky, etc)
My father developed(and I saw) mission movies taken from US WWII fighters and bombers way back in the 1940's in Europe that put these "official" modern movies to shame.
You can't tell me this is the quality expected of "official" Navy footage in 2008. I would not believe it for a second.
Obviously very poor quality US propaganda, and even more suspect since Chaney was on one of those boats that week PRIOR to this incedent, threatening war on Iran.