Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- It’s Official: A Democratic President Proposes to Cut Social Security
- An Outpouring of Love and Support for Bradley Manning to Receive the Nobel Peace Prize
- Exxon Tar Sands Spill Continues to Devastate Arkansas Community
- Exxon's Unfriendly Skies: Why Does Exxon Control the No-Fly Zone Over Arkansas Tar Sands Spill?
- The Treason of Intellectuals
- Exxon Tar Sands Spill Continues to Devastate Arkansas Community
- Fukushima Meltdown Driving Increased Abnormalities Among US Infants
- The Treason of Intellectuals
- Exxon's Unfriendly Skies: Why Does Exxon Control the No-Fly Zone Over Arkansas Tar Sands Spill?
- The Growing Campaign to Revoke Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize
Popular content
Today's Top News
Let's Not Spy for the FBI
Plans for the US to access UK citizen's personal information via a shared international database are disturbing: we shouldn't sign up to it
News that the US government is in the process of constructing an international "wanted" database to share biometric information on a grand scale should be treated with caution. Biometrics - including DNA and fingerprints - are a vital weapon in the fight against crime. And cross-border crime is a growing problem. I am determined that Britain should work with our allies, in Europe and beyond, to defeat it. But giant databases that don't have adequate privacy protection systems are not the right way forward.The details of how the US system will operate are still opaque. They may bring forward proposals we should support.
But I won't be holding my breath. It is typical of the US administration to go for overkill: giant solutions that sound great on paper but are based on unproven and even unworkable technologies. The "son of Star Wars" anti-ballistic missile system, which would attempt to shoot down incoming missiles, is a case in point. It's cost billions but not only does it anger countries like Russia, it doesn't even work.
Unfortunately, it is also typical of the UK government to doff its cap and sign up to any idea that emerges from Washington, however kooky. We're signed up to son of Star Wars. I expect we'll be signed up the FBI's "Server in the Sky" too, whether it's the right thing to do or not.
Biometrics are invaluable, but they are not 100% failsafe: nothing is. Remember: it's the US terrorism operations that put Yusuf Islam (the musician formerly known as Cat Stevens) on a "no-fly" list.
And once data is in the hands of the US authorities, there is no getting it back. We already send them massive amounts of information about air passengers, through a deal brokered by the European Commission, without any guarantee it will be properly safeguarded once it reaches the US. It would be foolhardy to start sharing further information without a simple guarantee: that data collected under UK law should continue to be protected even after it leaves Britain.
We should share information when other countries can guarantee data protection standards that match, or exceed our own. Otherwise, who knows which one of us will be on the no-fly list next.
Nick Clegg is the Liberal Democrats' home affairs spokesman.
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2008
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

5 Comments so far
Show AllWho would even want to cooperate with the Fascist Bastards Incorporated?
Hey, Brits - why so worried? God loves America the best, man. All we're trying to do is stop all crime in the entire universe forever - except for corporate crime, that is. Chill out and cough up the retina scans already... or all the children might die!
As I've said before, the Bill of Rights was worded to limit government powers -- and to grant citizen counterweights to government powers.
If the government can snoop (Fourth Amendment be damned), then it seems somewhat plausible to balance the asymmetry by allowing private citizens the right to snoop on the spooks, their elected officials, etc. to keep them honest as well. Who polices the police?
This isn't a step toward reducing terrorism, it's a step toward further reducing the legacy of freedom bought with our ancestors' blood, sweat and tears. The 9/11 tragedy could have been prevented with existing laws. It was incompetence (or perhaps witting negligence) that squandered opportunities to foil the plot. The USAPATRIOT, Military Commissions and Protect America Acts are superfluous from a security standpoint, devastating from a constitutional and human rights standpoint, and superbly useful from a totalitarian standpoint. For reasons unclear to me Nostradamus is often glorified as a great prophet, but it's Orwell who most accurately predicted our sorry lot.
Steal the surveillance cameras, file your fingerprints, destroy your V-chip, including the one in your passport, and memorize great books.