Guantánamo: How Much Longer?
The notorious prison is six years old today. But despite calls from across the US political spectrum, it doesn't look likely to close soon
On January 11 2008 the US prison camp at Guantánamo Bay enters the seventh year since the first men captured during the "war on terror" were brought there shackled, hooded, masked and ear-muffed.
Much has happened over the past few years that should have sufficed in bringing about the demise and closure of the world's most notorious prison: The 2004 US supreme court ruling in Rasul (2004) passed in favour of the right of detainees to apply for habeas corpus; the US supreme court ruling in Hamdan (2006) stating President Bush did not have the authority to set up military commissions because it violated the uniform code of military justice (UCMJ) and the Geneva conventions.
Also, last year, in the cases of Salim Hamdan (allegedly Osama bin Laden's driver) and Omar Khadr (a Canadian citizen detained since the age of 15), all charges were dismissed because they had only been classified as "enemy combatants" and not "unlawful enemy combatants". Despite all of these rulings by the highest court in the land both men - and about 275 others - remain in custody without charge or trial.
Just before the advent of 2008, Guantánamo's most well-known prisoner, David Hicks, was finally freed in his native Australia. In May 2007, Hicks entered a plea bargain and became the first prisoner to be convicted in Guantánamo. He was given a custodial sentence of only nine months - which he served out in his home town, Adelaide.
In this country, four British residents, on whose behalf the Blair administration had refused to intervene, were finally reunited with their families in this country last year. The struggle for two others, Binyam Mohammed and Ahmed Belbacha, continues.
Nearly 500 men have been released from Guantánamo since it was opened in 2002. This is quite surprising considering all of them, including me, were deemed by the US administration as the "worst of the worst". Even more surprising is the fact that at least two of them, released several years ago, included the former Taliban foreign minister and spokesman.
Of the Saudi citizens, who once outnumbered all other nationalities in the camp, only a handful remains. They include a former UK resident, Shaker Aamer, whose return to Saudi Arabia his British wife and children eagerly await.
During 2006 and last year, five other men were freed from Guantánamo, though by more unconventional means. Four of them allegedly committed suicide - though no post-mortem reports have ever been made public - and, less than a fortnight ago, an Afghan prisoner became the first to die of "natural causes". The bodies were all returned home.
If all of the above is not enough to bring about the end for Guantánamo then perhaps we need to hear what some the most influential people in the US have said about it:
The former US secretary of state, Colin Powell, said: "... if it were up to me I would close Guantánamo not tomorrow but this afternoon" and "... I would get rid of Guantánamo and the military commission system."
The former US president, Jimmy Carter, said: "... our government needs to close down Guantánamo and the two dozen other secret detention facilities ..."
The former US president, Bill Clinton, said: "... [Guantánamo should be] closed down or cleaned up..."
Even the US president, GW Bush, said: "I would like to close the camp [Guantánamo]..."
The US senator, Barack Obama, said: "While we're at it ... we're going to close Guantánamo. And we're going to restore habeas corpus ... We're going to lead by example, by not just word but by deed. That's our vision for the future."
Senator Hilary Clinton said: "Guantánamo has become associated in the eyes of the world with a discredited administration policy of abuse, secrecy, and contempt for the rule of law. Rather than keeping us more secure, keeping Guantánamo open is harming our national interests."
Senator John McCain said: "Guantánamo has become a symbol around the world that is not good ... we should try them or release them".
The latter three have just contested elections for state primaries and will soon be fighting to assume the presidency of the US. This will come after the long overdue departure of Bush later this year. Guantánamo will probably not be closed before that happens, but as long as it remains open there will be people calling unequivocally for it to close.
Moazzam Begg is a former Guantanamo Bay detainee and spokesman for Cageprisoners.
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2008
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
13 Comments so far
Show All¿ What is the purpose of torture but to create terror,
certainly not to attempt to gain information
(that would be errant to the max) ?
The purpose of terror on FAUX's "24", is of course the usual violence and adrenaline rush to sell the marketed products, but much more insidiously wicked is the literal selling of TERROR (sorry I mean TORTURE, but it's the same now) itself as needed justifiable, and consistent with good people doing good things (even if that is illegal)
Namaste … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … Mahatma Gandhi … … … … … … … … … …
« We must be the change we wish to see in the world »
« There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need but not for man's greed »
I read Thong-girl's comments, and it just seems to hammer home the point, that we on CD are in the minority. We are not "sheeple", but people who can see what is happening, are able to tell bullshit from truth, and recognise evil when it is happening.
The majority, on the other hand do not watch "real" news, but buy easy to read (and look at) tabloid newspapers, watch hours of garbage on the TV, and feed themselves with junk which I would not give to a pig (and they are a pretty unfussy animal when it comes to eating habits), and are totally incapable of drawing the line between fact and fiction.
When it comes to Guantanamo Bay, most Americans believe that it is there to protect them from the evil that is World terrorism, because their Commander in Chief told them so. This belief comforts politicians from all sides, because it means they don't have to do a thing about it, because the majority don't give a damn.
We on CD do not elect the politicians, it is the majority who will vote for Hilary - because of "Girl power", or Barak - the skinny master of the speech, or maybe McCain - because he is a "God fearing man".
We on CD are more concerned with more important issues, like the closure of illegal camps, torture of prisoners, cluster bombs, invading countries to steal their oil. These are all issues which have the following effect on most of our good citizens:
Bring on a headache
Give them indigestion
Force them to change the channel, so they can watch Rambo again.
Let's first concentrate on shutting down the Prison Industry Complex in general and then only will GITMO follow suit.
Poor Moazzam Baig.
He survived Guantanamo under horrendous circumstances. If the US believes these men are guilty, then why have they not been given access to lawyers or any legal representation ?
If those who truly believe Bush and his administration deserve to be charged, with war crimes, it is time to turn up the volume and stop pussy footing around. Where are the demands from those whose candidates refuse to make iron clad commitments to the rule of law and for bringing criminals to justice? I just got an invitation to a party for Obama that they wanted $2,300.00 for a ticket. That doesn't sound like the man of the people he portends to be. Hillary has refused to comment on any specifics about bringing the criminals to justice and the rest of the invertebrate Dems have crawled back into their hole.
A couple of us dressed in orange jumpsuits with a large "Close Guantanamo" banner went on an overpass today with thousands of cars traveling underneath in rush hour. We were a little surprised to get more fingers and other vulgar signs than when we are out there in regular dress and with our "End the War" banners. (We counted, however about 20 or so waves or friendly honks for every 6 of the negative hand gestures.)
We deduced that many Americans were unaware of Bush's stated desire to close Guantanamo but have instead been simply brainwashed to equate wearing an orange jumpsuit with being a terrorist. Ironically, just as we on the bridge were innocent, albeit dressed in orange jumpsuits, so are many of those being held in Guantanamo.
GOD - sends us links to his best music for this occasion.
Satanism is boy bush's state religion. Gitmo produces the snuff videos he jacks off to. By the way, he's not president, and yes, this is an international ciizen's arrest.
Is Spandau still standing?
Where is the movement for accountability of the criminal group of neocons who have brought us these disgraces? Are they going to be allowed to live normal lives getting rich off corporate fascist directorships and trusteeships? We need to have war crimes trials here in the United States and then send them on to the Hague for international war crimes trials. They all need to serve serious jail time.
yes! just one little building to house maybe 6 or 8 war criminals--wouldn't that be nice, justice on this Earth for a change. Those 6 or 8 treated exactly like all the rest these long six years...Bush, Cheney, Rove, Perle, Wolfowitz, Rice, Abrams, Gonzalez...
I want to keep it open...for Bush/Cheney & Co.
Another reason for Americans to be ashamed of their government.