EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Shell and Total Square Up Over Gasfield in Iraq's Sunni Heartland
Shell and Total are vying to develop a huge gasfield in what was Iraq's most violent province as a source for exports to Europe.The Iraqi Government held talks with a number of potential companies last week regarding development of the Akkas field in Anbar province, northwest of Baghdad.
Akkas, close to the border with Syria, is thought to contain up to seven trillion cubic feet of gas - up to 6 per cent of Iraq's estimated total of 112 trillion cubic feet. The field is capable of producing up to 50 million cubic feet a day, but this could be raised to 450 million cubic feet per day if developed further.
The Iraqi Government is keen to get the field operational as quickly as possible, using nearby Syria as an export route to Europe to restore revenues. A statement from Shell said that the Iraqi Oil Ministry had asked Shell to undertake "a long-term production test". Total was unavailable for comment, but is also understood to be interested.
In the longer term, both Western oil giants hope to win an equity stake in the project, which would also provide a toehold for further long-term exploration and development in Iraq, which has the world's third-largest oil reserves.
The development of Akkas could mark a turning point in the fortunes of Iraq's oil industry. Anbar is dominated by Sunni tribal groups who were fiercely opposed to the 2003 United States-led invasion. Until recently, it was the scene of some of Iraq's most intense violence, including inter-factional fighting and attacks on US and Iraqi government troops. Since last summer the security situation has improved and that has encouraged the oil giants to look again at the area, which includes the country's western deserts. Akkas is 40km from the Syrian border and is close to existing government-owned facilities in Syria. Shell has been active in Syria for 25 years and operates a joint venture with the Syrian Government and Chinese and Indian partners.
It is not yet clear whether the Iraqi Government will pick a Western oil major, such as Shell or Total, to help to develop the field. It may opt, instead, for a partnership with an oil services company, such as Halliburton or Schlumberger, which would then supply the technical expertise to develop the field and related pipelines to Syria for processing and export.
Last month, Ahmad al-Shammaa, Iraq's Deputy Oil Minister, said that the Government had been hoping to issue a first round of tenders for a number of oilfields early this year.
They are expected to concentrate on the redevelopment of Akkas, as well as other fields such as Rumeila South, Rumeila North, Subba/Luhais, Zubair and Missan in southern Iraq, and Kirkuk in northern Iraq.
Before the effort to depose Saddam Hussein, Iraq signed a preliminary agreement with Syria to supply it with 50 million cubic feet of gas a day from the Akkas gasfield. The Syrians are eager to revive this agreement.
The development of the Akkas field could yet be bogged down by political concerns. The Iraqi Government has not yet passed a long-awaited hydrocarbon law that would determine how oil and gas revenues are distributed.
Slow progress has been made so far because of a dispute with the Kurdish autonomous region over its right to develop Northern Iraqi oilfields without supplying proceeds to the central government in Baghdad.
© 2007 Times Online
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

8 Comments so far
Show AllI posted this link to another thread, but it has significance for this item, too, http://www.energybulletin.net/38948.html as it shows the very rapid decline in UK net petroleum exports, which would cause the UK government to join the escalation of the Iraqi Holocaust.
Another nail in the coffin of CO2 being built to smother the human race.
Now, does anyone have any doubt what the Iraq war was about. Before the war, Saddam/Iraq had contracted with Russia, France and China to develop these fields. First pop out of the invasion bag, these contracts were cancelled. Ah, but the question is - do Ami taxpayers pay for the security forces necessary to guard development and delivery? Yeah, we'll be there a long time, but, a fair question: what's in it for us? Reminds me of the guy who bought a gold mine to learn his partner got the production part and he got the "shaft".
The Iraqis need to remember its their gas and oil. Not Cheney's.
If there is anything positive about the war, it is high oil prices and Iraqi oil staying in the ground. The market will be flooded, down to $2.00/bbl, and CO2 and global warming will increase that much faster.
The US needs a moritorium on increased fossil fuel useage, and then a plan to cut back. Which candidate is strongest there? Edwards? We need to cut back, but only increases are planned.
".. the Iraqi Government .. may opt, instead, for a partnership with an oil services company, such as Halliburton .."
Surprise! Surprise!
The antidote for Big Oil is direct democracy.
KUCINICH! America's best hope for restoring democracy and moving forward with renewable energy sources and higher mpg standards.
"The development of the Akkas field could yet be bogged down by political concerns. The Iraqi Government has not yet passed a long-awaited hydrocarbon law that would determine how oil and gas revenues are distributed."
The oil minister seems to be moving ahead of the Iraqi governing body, which to date has resisted corporate oil interests in these fields. We all know what that would mean. Major oil companies would get most of the profits and Iraqi people would lose big time! Is this a sign they are caving in to Big Oil's pressure? What a shame.
"Slow progress has been made so far because of a dispute with the Kurdish autonomous region over its right to develop Northern Iraqi oilfields without supplying proceeds to the central government in Baghdad." There you go = the internal Iraqi struggle continues. Divide and conquer. The Iraqi people will not benefit from their own resources, unless they first resolve their own internal issues. Greed triumphs again.