Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
It's My Party: I'll Taser if I Want To
Marketing Tactic Jolting Sales of Self-Defense Item
GILBERT, Ariz. - Before she lets them shoot her little pink stun gun, Dana Shafman ushers her new friends to the living room sofa for a serious chat about the fears she believes they all share.
"The worst nightmare for me is, while I'm sleeping, someone coming in my home," Shafman says, drawing a few solemn nods from the gathered women. Shafman, 34, of Phoenix, says she knows how they feel. She says she used to stash knives under her pillow for protection.
Welcome, she says, to the Taser party.
On the coffee table, Shafman spreads out Taser's C2 "personal protector" weapons that the company is marketing to the public. It doesn't take long before the women are lined up in the hallway, whooping as they take turns blasting at a metallic target.
"C'mon!" she says. "Give it a shot."
Shafman isn't an employee of Scottsdale, Ariz.-based Taser International. She's an independent entrepreneur who's been selling Tasers the way her mother's generation sold plastic food storage containers.
As a single woman who lives alone, Shafman says she's the perfect pitchwoman for Taser as it makes a renewed push to sell weapons to families.
The company agrees. Taser officials like Shafman's homespun sales tactics so much that they plan to build a living room set at the International Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas and have Shafman hold a Taser party for buyers and dealers. The show, which runs Jan. 7-10, is one of the world's largest tech trade shows.
Taser doesn't expect its dealers to start imitating Shafman. But Steve Tuttle, a Taser spokesman, says company officials think people can learn from her approach.
"When I talk about Taser, I come across as a salesman," Tuttle says. "When you see her it comes across as very real."
Shafman, a freelance construction consultant, says she always had a natural interest in self-defense products. She loved the idea of the Taser, which would allow her to stop an attacker from across the room without getting physical.
She tried moonlighting as a door-to-door Taser saleswoman. But years of negative press about Taser made it tough.
So the Taser party was born.
Shafman says she's sold about 30 guns per month at $349.99 since her first Taser party on Oct. 15. She doesn't get a commission from Taser. Instead, Shafman says she gets a discounted dealer rate for the units and keeps the difference.
Taser has been growing on Wall Street two years after the Securities and Exchange Commission concluded its investigation into the company's safety claims and business practices. Its stock more than doubled in 2007 from a low of $7.44 to a high of $19.36 a share.
Company officials say that they're now selling Tasers in 43 countries and that more than 12,500 police agencies in the United States are either using or testing their weapons.
It launched the C2 in August. Though it packs the same electric punch, the C2 is smaller than the bulky personal stun guns Taser developed years ago, and its sleek exterior makes it look more like an electric razor than a weapon. They're legal in every state except New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Michigan, Wisconsin, Hawaii, and Washington, D.C.
Amnesty International, which has criticized Taser's assertion that its weapons are nonlethal, objects to any attempt to spread the use of stun guns. Officials with the human rights organization say the weapons are frequently used in excess by trained police, and they're likely to be abused by the public as well.
Shafman says that if she had a choice between getting shocked or being attacked with a knife, a gun, or something else, "I'd much rather be assaulted by a Taser."
And unlike other weapons, she says, Taser forces its customers to submit to a criminal background check before giving them a code to turn on their weapons.
© 2007 Associated Press

78 Comments so far
Show AllFinally they are now a "consumer" item, I think our legislators have missed the boat, there should be a law that says every newborn infant shall be presented with a personal protection device of the parents choosing of a revolver, pistol or taser. we would have a citizenry armed and therefore safe and more importantly feel safe while they slept. Lets do it right. The fine print also deals out a full suit of body armor to make you doubly safe. Bring on the turrists and bandits etc.
Switzerland has outlawed the use of tasers by police as being instruments of torture. But Switzerland is civilized. The US is not.
From pepper spray to pink tasers. Remember when Fascinating Womanhood was encouraged to carry little bottles of pepper spray around? Wonder how taser sales to the Gay community will be framed?
absolutely stunning..........
Making money-convincing people to purchase instruments of torture. Some people wouldn't recognize a moral or an ethic if it bit them in the arse.
What a country! Only in America could we have the freedom to buy a pink taser. Are we going to arm out teens as well. How about something for the baby in the stroller? And then Grandma and Grandpa. Let's just replace the stars on the flag with guns, put on our brown shirts and help the empire stomp all over the world in its IRON HEEL.
Hoa binh
I was wondering when this story of Taser parties was going to be covered. There was a report on Taser parties way back on November 21 on CTV - go to video where it says: "CTV British Columbia: St. John Alexander on how Tasers are viewed south of the border 2:11"
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20071121/taser_kennedy_071121/20071121/
As a woman, tasers don't make me feel any safer.
RE: - for a serious chat about the fears she believes they all share.
The Shock Doctrine used to make money - surprise surprise!
RE: - And unlike other weapons, she says, Taser forces its customers to submit to a criminal background check before giving them a code to turn on their weapons.
Like they do for handguns and other fire arms? Or is this like the locker combination you are not supposed to share with your friends?
What did people used to do to cars when they did not have the key to start them?
Former adviser to Harper and Day lobbies for Taser
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20071214/taser_lobby_071214/20071214/
Anybody breaking into your house in the middle of the night is either armed, on drugs, or some little prick from the FBI trying to get a peek at your address book. If they are on drugs, the taser, probably won't work. If they are armed they will have the gun pointed at your head way before you get close enough to taser them. That only leaves the FBI prick, and I say, taser 'em bro.
Is there a demo at the presentation?
"Ladies, who wants to go first?"
Wow-this is not our father's bb gun now, is it? May I introduce my solution to this problem
As a 50-y/o independent woman working in food service and care providing with all over the clock working hours, I have carried an excellent quality nickel-plated brass whistle on my key chain since high school as a deterrent/alarm and it has worked fine both times I have had to use it. Scares the pants off anyone nearby; assailant takes off running, adrenalin reabsorbs and on with my life I go. A bit shaken but not harmed-proactive, aware, anticipatory.
Also watching myself and the environment, walking purposefully with my head up and not looking lost or stupid–we've all heard this common sense repeated a million times. If only we could remember it in moments of need.
I have always been afraid that if i had a weapon it would (or could anyway) be taken from me and used on me instead-not a pretty thought since I have a low pain tolerance and a broken up body to begin with.
The story behind this story is the absurd, usually unwarranted, paranoid, class and race-based fear among bourgeois USAns. Please get over it.
Now we can 'taser' our misbehaving children? Egad!
this brings to mind a 'keystone' cops-like scenario where the bandits are facing the police and they all keep bumping into each other and falling down. it could be the same with the tasers: joe public versus the police force. all tasering each other simultaneously and falling down, then recovering and getting up and doing it all again...............ad infinitum
Coming soon to a WalMart near you. In many new colours, too! Watch your MSM ads for the next sale!!!
vaudree-
Being a woman tasers don't make me feel safe either.
In the 1980s I lived in Philadelphia in a relatively crime-ridden neighborhood. Many people I knew were mugged. The thing that always stuck with me was a story of a woman who carried a gun, and when she was mugged, the perpetrators overpowered her and were able to use her own gun on her.
This falls into the same logical category as the great global arms trade.
M-I-C-T-C (Mil. Indust. Congr. Tupperware. Complex)
"Are we going to arm out teens as well. How about something for the baby in the stroller?" (since1492)
strollerblades?
"She loved the idea of the Taser, which would allow her to stop an attacker from across the room without getting physical."
Teaser or Taser? Let her change her own flat tire.
Another piece of evidence that the govt has sold it's souls to the money scoundrel, devil; and the citizenry follows, much.
Gun ownership in the U.S. has clearly and absolutely nothing to do with defending the country or even a state against internal and external enemies; and it has really nothing to do with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Sure, the Constitution and BoR are used to argue in defence of the right to gun ownership, but all it's really about is as per the status quo "me, myself, and I, alone, screw all of the rest of you" culture AGAIN, as usual; in the good'ol US of A, whatever you want the 'A' to mean.
Oh well, US of As want to give the rest of the world all the more cause for mocking and hating the U.S. It's not like the rest of the world and sane Americans needed more proof, but it never ceases to be added to.
Even bearers of loaded guns can have these removed and turned against the owners. It only takes a little "savoir faire".
Gun-happy US of As.
You could put somebodies eye out!!!
whatfools January 5th, 2008 2:57 pm,
yeah, where did they say you can get them?
A significant number of guns used to commit crimes are guns that are stolen in home burgleries. It's comforting to know that yet another weapon of violence is being introduced into the criminal arsenal as the "free market" for weaponary continually expands. I suppose it's better to be silently tazered in an elevator by a mugger than shot with a conventional gun thereby disturbing people who are peacefully sleeping nearby.
Sailia asked What does the law say if you taser an intruder and the intruder dies? Manslaughter or first degree murder?
What y'all seem to be missing is that in many states it is illegal to shoot an intruder, UNLESS they threaten your life with a weapon (knife, gun, etc).
What y'all are also missing is that in all states an intruder has the right to sue (and win) if the homeowner harms the intruder. I guess when the first tasered intruder brings a civil case against the homeowner this will open people's eyes.
I bring this to your attention to demonstrate that our laws, and society, is really f**ked up.
re: Whatfools January 5th, 2008 2:57 pm above,
"Now we can 'taser' our misbehaving children?"
I was just reading about a dad abusing (and almost killing) his children. He might not have used an available gun (too permanent and hard to cover up) but he would surely have grabbed a taser in a second. These will be used to torture in the home. I'll bet it takes less than five years before we start to hear horror stories.
It's not the "less harmful than guns" that's important, it's the "doesn't leave marks." Tasers for kids sounds like a sick joke, Tasers ON kids is gonna be the story that'll open a few peoples' eyes. Makes me cringe to think of it.
Sorry celabrate; I read 'acquaintances' as 'acquiescences'.
I agree with the gist of most of the comments but as usual, the issue of violence against women, which is endemic and mostly perpetrated by the acquaintances of women, is minimized or ignored by the commenters.
Look at the misogyny of dreamertoo's comment:
"Teaser or Taser? Let her change her own flat tire."
Progessive, eh?
So, all of you commentors, if we all agree that taser-toting is a horrifying and fruitless way of stopping vilence against women, what are better ways of liberating ourselves from gender violence?
"mostly perpetrated by the acquaintances of women" (celabrate)
Who's a misogynist?
Blaming women for being attacked is obscene.
Stop the hate and stop the violence.
A fool proof protection for the single woman:
a suicide belt
a hand granade
a small dog
take your pick.
She's using Bush's scare tactics to sell. What does the law say if you taser an intruder and the intruder dies? Manslaughter or first degree murder?
I'm for people using tasers if they let me use the defibrillator on Cheney. Repeatedly.
or would I prefer waterboarding? Surfs up!
Decisions, decisions!
If tasers don't leave marks, I'm with those here who see them as the new domestic violence weapon of choice. Fists leave bruises...
This country is insane - unleashing destructive technologies like these into the world because the "free-market is the most compassionate" donchayaknow.
"It's My Party: I'll Taser if I Want To "
I just heard about the new drinking game with tasers that have a rheostat! These crazy floks in Bellevue tase(?) themselves till it makes them react and they have to drink! As it goes around the room you just turn it up! Isn't that smart?! Just like politics and the law! Now I know I have smart friends!
I think I'll buy one because I'm afraid of burglars when I'm in the shower...
Um, I wish I was kidding about my friends.
"...what are better ways of liberating ourselves from gender violence?"
Judo. Kung-Fu. Tae Kwon Do.
And a can-do/don't-take-shit attitude.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0piEyfcVAk
America, the land of morbid obesity and... Tasers.
Tasers should be outlawed because it would create a criminal society. There would be swarm of innocent people tasered from behind and then robbed by criminals.
All right - I am calling you boys out on your sexism.
Twister22 - So, tasers are bad, but physical agression is good? Come on? This is progressive?
And why are you making it my burden as a woman to end gender violence? How is my attitude supposed to stop violence? Mostly men perpetrate gender violence - what is YOUR responsibility?
Whatfools - what about protection for "the married woman?" - since married/partnered women are way more likely to be attacked by their partner?
Can we be a little more progressive, people?
Because if you're looking at violence as the solution,
I say male castration and mandatory curfews are much, much, better options.
Dreamertoo, most violent crimes against women are perpetrated by acquaintances. If you think this is my opinion, look it up. I am not blaming women, silly; I am blaming a culture that tolerates violence against women. And then tells women to learn judo to stop the violence.
Sigh.
Heck I know I can't talk because I'm a guy, but I would like to enter hacky sac as an option to fighting and tasers. I used to get beat up all the time as an inner city youth until I learned hacky sac and I have not been in a real fight since, the whole hood would watch. Self esteem plays a big part in it for me.
The ability to but my foot down where ever it may need be put, with the necessary force and direction, is a big thing. There is nothing more beautiful than a woman hacker, need I say more? I hope all the women hackers age as beautifully as they play! WOW!
Castration with a dull spoon is the best option for sex offenders but we need to do something about the worthiness of our courts. I feel I need to address this. I hate sex offenders. I was raised by 5 women and one loser. To the ax!
I hope to never hear considerations of castration again, even jokingly.
Celabrate said "Because if you're looking at violence as the solution,
I say male castration and mandatory curfews are much, much, better options."
you would have to be a total basketcase to consider that funny, and to act as if it is something of an answer?
if you're a woman, and you think that is funny, you've betrayed everything that women, and people in general are supposed to have as sensibilities. don't you know about empathy. this isn't some matter of lifestyle, you are talking about. This is a part of their being, physical and emotional. What type of a person jokes about that?
Ren ren - you are RIGHT. Sexual violence is no joking matter. Violence begets violence. Agression does not create safety.
That is why you must agree that all of the uninformed comments about teasing, tire changes, small dogs, can do attitudes etc . . . are all ridiculous, unhelpful, and small-minded.
So, I ask you - and all the male progressive-minded commenters - how do you propose we liberate ourselves (including you) from gender violence? Which means, how do we prevent attacks from happening in the first place, rather than focusing ONLY on defending ourselves from attacks?
I would stop making it a matter of one vs. the other
be it in terms of gender, or race, or politics. "I ask you- and all the male progressive..."
you group yourselves in with one another in given sections only, why? Do you agree with all the women or progressives or any of those, probably not. You agree with people who share your sensibilities and your needs and for the most part your world view. Don't set yourself up with false parameters. I purposefully separate myself from age, gender, and any other affiliations I can avoid, because they don't offer anything. I would feel the same way about this as a female as I would a male. Gender violence is not something you can be 'liberated from' that's not how it works. misogyny is just another level of misunderstanding, that we like to attribute to males because of that barrier, but so far as I'm concerned, the way to fix that is not stronger, better armed women. It is a more stable human to human relationship, built not on defensiveness, but in openness. You make yourself sound like you too are on a pedestal looking down, right on with how the biggots would dismiss you.
Well, I don't have the privilege of "separating" myself from my gender association. That is sorta the point of this article, right? If I get attacked, I don't get to choose to not be female.
Why can't we liberate ourselves and our culture from violence? Why "doesn't it work that way?" Isn't that why we read "common dreams?" Because we dream of a different way of living?
Of course we don't all agree or have the same ideas about how to create social change; that is why I asked you and all readers in good faith about your ideas and strategies.
And misogyny is a learned behavior exhibited by people and institutions. It isn't based on "misunderstanding." It's about power wielded violently by one group over another.
celabrate: the misunderstanding is that misogyny is perpetrated against women on the virtue of them being female. But this, also requires one to group women together, as a single entity against which violence is more or less justified. I'm not disputing that misogyny exists, I know damn well that it does.
"That is sorta the point of this article, right? If I get attacked, I don't get to choose to not be female." I'm saying by polarizing this like you do, you make yourself into the type of thing the misogynists look to, those nagging overly emotion based women. I'm saying you draw unnecessary lines while building your arguments. And in the castration thing, I was pointing out that only an insensitive close minded woman would bring that into play (not that you are that way), just the same way the small jokes bother you (in some cases rightly so).
"Why can't we liberate ourselves and our culture from violence? Why "doesn't it work that way?" Isn't that why we read "common dreams?" Because we dream of a different way of living?" You keep flexing the language of my argument. I'm not saying "stop dreaming, you can't win" not in the least. Not in the least! why would I entertain this exchange like you try to, if I believed nothing could be gained from it? I say asking for liberation from violence, especially by providing yourself with better arms to fend men off with is not the way to go. Liberation as far as I understand has been achieved by women through often extraneous measures, which in some cases helped to isolate and victimize them. (read some of the fringe feminist activities) If you present a rational argument you can do fine. I don't think tasers are the answer to anything. A woman on the street with a taser, is just as endangered, the same way a man with a gun is threatening his own life just as much as any attacker who might come his way.
I can't stress enough how capable we should be to step outside of our defined roles when speaking to one another, and to a large extent in our daily lives. Yes when physically attacked, gender will not be something you can ignore as immaterial, but when you're not naked and controlled, your personal being should be as evident or incognito as you want. You say you don't have this ability at the beginning of your reply, but I don't think this is the case. Very few things you think should be "I as a woman" just as much as it shouldn't be "I as a liberal," or "I as a forty five year old" "I as a heterosexual," all of that can be dropped, as it only serves to separate us.
It is obvious that these people deserve what they get. Together with that stupid Taser they get the 'Law Of Attraction' package.
Whatever You fear, You draw to You like flies are drawn to shit. If You are afraid of getting raped, if You are afraid the burglars will take Your money, if You are afraid that You won't get a parking space, You are in for exactly that. We attract what our mind spins around about.
Surely those women look like they need to protect themselves. The question is: From What? Most likely from people like Dana Shafman, that are like so many other 'Good American Scammers' only interested in the dough, but not in the safety of those people. Safety comes from 'feeling' safe. Some people tend to build a 'virtual' ICBM launch pad to feel safe. But even that won't protect You if Your time has come.
Such is the belief of the American soul, that weapons, including non lethal ones like tasers, are a guarantee for anything.
Well, maybe it has to do with the MK-Ultra, CIA mind control program, that runs on high rpm 'right' now? That would be a really good excuse. You could say: "Hell I don't know why I bought this shit, but something told me I need it..."
As a notorious optimist I have to tell You all is lost. Americans are dumbed down already to a degree, where they can't free themselves anymore of the iron grip of a corporate police state that tells the people the same shit Shafman tells those women. There is no difference. The thing is, that those people really believe what they say. How do You go about that? A citizenry that has lost its common sense and dignity through fascist principles, hammered down on them on every channel, every radio station. Dream on, if You think NPR would be a difference. To hell with NPR and all those editing hypocrites. How deep can You stick Your head into the 'Ass' of this 'Ministration'.
Fear is a very bad advisor. Always was and always will be. Yet it is the easiest way to control people of the like in the picture.
Scared of Commies, Terrorists, Rapists, Murderers, Burglars and Aliens, Americans need to concede to the realities of life, not to some bs weapons manufacturer or as a matter of fact, the ungovernment of the U. S. of Un-A..
Tell me if I have forgotten anything. ;-)
All I wanted was to open a dialogue about ending violence. Sigh. Maybe someone out there will have something else to say?
fear is not a good adviser. That's what Vincente Fox said as a matter of fact. About the U.S and our xenophobic and racist tendencies toward mexico and the rest of the world beyond our blinders.
"All I wanted was to open a dialogue about ending violence. Sigh. Maybe someone out there will have something else to say?"
explain to me why what I was saying was not to the effect you were seeking. I am asking for clarifications, that you can easily squash if you think they are wrong.
And on top of it all this thread is drifting into gender issues. Wow. That's cool. Why?
Because I can tell You something about gender. Itsjustkarma is a Male To Female
Transgender person and the only reason I would ever come up with that, are those
ridiculous arguments about women being target of men. Since when do males and
females share the planet? 500 years? 5000 years?
Who has invented, developed and manufactured all kinds of weapons on this planet,
male or female?
Who is leading the biggest corporations and governments on this suffering planet?
Women or men?
Generally speaking women give life, men take it. Has always been that way. Looks
like it is going to be that way for much longer too.
Men love wars, fighting, killing, raping, torturing, oppressing and controlling. That does
not mean, that there are not women out there who are equally fucked up in their mind.
Like women in the armed forces are the biggest blasphemy I can think of. Knowing what
it means to carry a child in one's womb for nine month, only to kill it, no matter how long after
birth doesn't make sense. Women who kill are the weirdest glitch in evolution. As if the males
want to draw the females into their shitty world of violence and murder, to tell them later,
"What do You want, You are in this Yourself."
Any woman that denies the true nature of femininity is a waste of bio mass. Don't You remember
how it was in Your mom's arms?
If You arm women, You most certainly finish Your society. Well I know, there's not much 'left'
of this one here, but there got to be an effort.
Gender is the last religiously instigated divide of humans. Gender has no meaning other than
being fit to copulate and multiply to maintain the species.
Do Whales or Dolphins need tasers against sharks? Or against the Navy?
Why is it so god damn difficult to focus on the only really important thing in life, to be a good
human being, stepping in for the ones that need help.
Watch the movie 'The Secret'. They're really excellent in telling You WHERE Your fears come from
and what they do to You. Women get raped by their fear before they become a victim in life.
Remember the 'Hate Crime Bill' the senate passed a few month ago? Well, do I need to buy
myself a Taser now? Most hate crimes are directed against the gay and lesbian community, to which
You are counted if You suffer from the 'Henry Benjamin Syndrome'.
Maybe Common Dreams wants to 'tease' the remaining progressives (minus pseudos) with stories
like this one?
Celabrate, don't give in into fear. Don't be afraid. Don't be like those women.
The fact that most rape crimes are committed by family members, 'acquaintances', or co-workers
makes it clear that the Taser is not the means of choice to protect You from rape.
Enough commenters have mentioned what happens if You get mugged, carrying a gun or weapon
Yourself. Or taking a shower...
The world is ripe for somebody that takes fear away from people, not like the bushistas, giving You
ever more reasons why You have to be afraid.
The other thing that comes to my mind is a situation in traffic, where somebody doesn't drive the way
the guy with the Taser on board wants it. His passenger window is open and he shoots his Taser at
others in traffic, like on the freeway in a jam...
Sorry for the lengthy piece, but sometimes it just pours out.
http://www.trance-formation.com/
ITSJUSTKARMA
i think it was a very good piece and eloquently and passionately said. you are so right about men loving to fight and show their male prowess. women like to be feminine. (well, ok, not all, and the same about the men, before someone jumps on those observations.) now as far as violence against women goes and rape, i believe (and i'm by no way a prude) that all this sex and pornography that is rammed down our throats (pun intended) and pictures of semi clad women in trashy msm tabloids has a lot to do with this increase in rape. how many women do you see raping men.? well ok maybe they aren't capable to overpower a man but my point is, we do not see male nudes in these tabloids or magazines. (well again maybe a few but not nearly as much as naked women) why not? and i believe that deep in the subconcious this display of nudity and pornography will eventually have an effect upon the male psyche. just as these psudeo 'tupperware' parties are instilling fear in the people who attend them.