EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
Popular content
Today's Top News
Foreign TV News Fell to Pre-9/11 Levels in 2007
WASHINGTON- With the exception of the Iraq war, foreign news coverage by the three major U.S. television networks declined significantly in 2007, according to the latest annual review by the authoritative Tyndall Report.Indeed, the foreign news bureaus of the three networks, ABC, CBS, and NBC, had their lightest year in 2007 since 2001, suggesting that the era of expanded international coverage that followed the Sep. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York and the Pentagon is now over.
Aside from Iraq-related stories, which together claimed about 13 percent of the total coverage of the three network evening news programmes, only two other foreign-based stories -- the recent political turmoil in Pakistan, and Iran's nuclear programme and alleged activities in Iraq -- made it onto the list of top 20 stories last year covered by the networks, while Latin America, East Asia, Africa, and even Europe were absent.
"We're now back to pre-9/11 levels of foreign news coverage," said Andrew Tyndall, the report's publisher, who has tracked the 30-minute evening network news shows for 20 years.
He added that this year's presidential election campaign was likely to add to the downward trend in foreign-news coverage. "On the four-year presidential election cycle, foreign coverage always goes down," he told IPS.
Even Iraq shows signs of decline, according to the report's tally. During the first nine months of 2007, combined coverage by the three network news programmes averaged 30 minutes a week.
But after the Democratic-led Congress proved unable to enact a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops in September, average weekly coverage of the conflict fell to a mere four minutes, by far the least amount coverage Iraq has received since the U.S. invasion in March 2003.
An estimated 25 million U.S. residents watch the 22 minutes of evening news the three networks broadcast on an average weekday evening. Although cable news -- including CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC -- have made important gains in the number of viewers of viewers who watch them, the audience for the network news is still roughly 10 times larger.
Polls show that a majority of the public relies primarily on television, as opposed to newspapers, magazines, radio or the Internet, for most of their information about national and international events and issues.
The three network weekday evening news shows provided a total of 14,727 minutes of coverage last year, of which 1,888 minutes was devoted to Iraq, making Iraq-related coverage the biggest by far for the fifth year in a row, according to the report.
By contrast, the next biggest story, the massacre by a deranged student of 33 people at Virginia Polytechnic Institute (Virginia Tech) last April, received a combined total of 244 minutes of coverage, while the third-ranking story, the wildfires that plagued southern California in October, received 221 minutes.
Still, the amount of coverage devoted to Iraq last year was less than half of the coverage the networks offered during the year of the invasion and less than 50 percent of the coverage in 2004.
Moreover, nearly two-thirds of total Iraq coverage last year was devoted to U.S. combat-related events, as opposed to sectarian violence or Iraqi politics and reconstruction. In the four previous years, including 2003, the news was focused less on the U.S. combat role. "Coverage of non-combat-related news really stopped abruptly in mid-September," said Tyndall.
After Iraq, the most-covered foreign stories were the political upheaval in Pakistan and concerns about Iran's military and nuclear operations, which claimed 165 minutes and 106 minutes, respectively. Of the top 20 stories, Pakistan ranked sixth and Iran 16th.
By comparison, five foreign stories besides the Iraq war made it into the top 20 last year. The war between Israel and Lebanon's Hezbollah ranked second with a total 578 minutes. North Korean missiles and nuclear weapons (162 minutes), Iran's nuclear programme (131 minutes), the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (121 minutes), and the Taliban resurgence in Afghanistan (83 minutes) all ranked in the top 20 in 2006. With the exception of Iran, all of these failed to appear on the list this year.
On the other hand, global warming, which was covered both from foreign bureaus and from U.S. datelines, claimed a total 103 minutes of coverage, placing it in 18th place this year, just ahead of stories about the increases in oil and petrol prices, which ranked 20th.
At the same time, total coverage of environmental and energy issues -- apart from storms and natural disasters (chronic favourites in on the television news agenda) -- received a total of 476 minutes of coverage, an increase of more than 50 percent over 2006, reaching the same level as coverage of terrorism this year.
Indeed, total terrorism-related coverage fell sharply in 2007 compared to the previous year -- from 1,191 minutes to 476 minutes. "Of all the statistics that I compiled this year, the parity between terrorism- and environment-related coverage was the most fascinating," Tyndall said. "On one hand, you have the rise of (former vice president and Nobel Peace Laureate) Al Gore's global consciousness and the decline of George W. Bush's global consciousness."
Aside from Iraq, Pakistan and Iran, the next most-covered foreign stories on the three network news programmes included Afghanistan and the campaign against al Qaeda (83 minutes each); the controversy over toxic toy imports from China (79 minutes); and terrorist plots in Britain and the news about the British royal family (72 minutes and 64 minutes, respectively).
Those were followed by intra-Palestinian conflicts (48 minutes); toxic pet-food imports from China and the crisis in Burma (43 minutes each); and the continuing violence in the Darfur region of Sudan (31 minutes), according to Tyndall.
Besides the Virginia Tech massacre and the California wildfires, other primarily domestic stories that made it into the top 20 included fluctuations in U.S. stock markets; winter blizzards; the meltdown of the U.S. real-estate market; the debate over illegal immigration; problems faced by military veterans and their families; the aftermath of the 2006 Hurricane Katrina; tornados; airline delays; and the presidential election campaign, which claimed 1,072 minutes of coverage in 2007, even though there remain 11 months before the actual balloting.
"Since Iraq coverage has declined so much since September, the big question for the national news media now is whether they will just cut back and turn more and more to the elections and other domestic coverage and thus save money, or whether they will redeploy their resources to cover other issues and events overseas," said Tyndall.
© 2008 Inter Press Service
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

23 Comments so far
Show AllAll the news from the colonies is bad. Why should I waste my pretty mind with that.
Do you think that Big Brother will find out that I have unpluged my television and only listen to foreign broadcasts, BBC and CBC, on the shortwave?
The corporate media is an enemy of democracy to the extent that their news programming can be considered a form of treason.
It is utterly impossible for a citizen relying on the MSM to participate in a democracy in any meaningful way - often even locally.
There's a myriad of foreign news services available other than our fascist corporate media. Here's a small sample of some of the more interesting news links from Russia, Italy, and Iran, respectively:
http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/tiki-view_articles.php?type=News
http://www.uruknet.info/
http://www.presstv.ir/
Enjoy. If any commondreamer know of more, please post....
I get my news from Democracy Now or Television Española Internacional (notice, from Spain, not Latin America).
www.rtve.es
When I have the misfortune to run across American network news I am flabbergasted by it. I mean, come on, what is there, 18 minutes an evening? While flipping channels, you are almost as likely to see a drug advertisement as a news report. And as for the reporting, the camera is pointed as much on the reporter (for those reaction shots showing perfectly coifed hair) as on the subject being reported on.
I suppose there is no motivation for them to cover political parties properly. That would alleviate the need for the major players to pony up the cash for campaign ads. Why isn't the Green party asked for their take on politics? How much air time can they afford? And if a network reports on dissenting opinions anyway, that TV network may find that ad revenue is starting to look elsewhere.
International reporting, forget it. It's too expensive. In a news/entertainment world free of license requirements to do a minimal amount of fair public service programming, there are cheaper ways to kill airtime and max out profits. Democracy be damned. Democracy isn't even a value for these people who seem to own what used to be the public airwaves.
The News companies are treating the American people like mushrooms. Not only are they feeding pablum on celebrities to entertain and distract us, now they are filtering/censoring important issues such as presidential candidates. And we continue to buy into it.
From Jack London's IRON HEEL: "You have forgotten the editors. They draw their salaries for the policy they maintain. Their policy is to print nothing that is a vital menace to the established. The press of the United States? It is a parasitic growth that battens on the capitalist class. Its function is to serve the established by moulding public opinion, and right well it serves it."
We'll get all the "news" we need to know that America trying its best to do the right thing in the world but an ungrateful world won't accept our kind imperial offers.
Hoa binh
Hoa binh
The best source of international news analysis I have found so far is the Asia Times:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page.html
So the rest of the world now has to wait patiently for what? Can we expect within the millennium or so the enlightenment, or a sense of responsibility, rising from the ignorant, lethargic, self-obsessed, apathetic, pathetic American citizenry? Will they change their system, change their way, even in their own interests, through democratic process, now totally eroded, while all but a very very few individuals even bother to be informed themselves about the American empire's tyranny abroad. As this article shows, the fascist corporate media is fulfilling its role admirably and to the letter. The American people are perfectly dumbed down and getting dumber by the minute.
They are even made to think, "They hate us for our values; for our freedom." Don't kid yourself. No, they hate you for your indifference to your own stupidity and ignorance; they see that the vast majority feel justified and superior, having their "leaders" impose their "self-interests"; hegemony, with violence and deceit on anyone in the world, but the same citizenry are totally, but I mean, totally dumb and ignorant. But no one hates a sheep. The same Neanderthals let themselves be led by the nose, by a succession of bit playing actors, and spin jockey smiling political faces, on behalf of the more sinister, if not less hidden corporate power elite who are thereby ever more firmly entrenched and guaranteed their position to exploit for gain at home and abroad as the ignorance blossoms and its roots spread beneath them.
What could a non-violent, non-American abroad watching this phenomenon hope for? How, with the prevalence of such oppressive self interest and ignorance could he hope to regain his own national sovereignty, a chance for him and his family to survive and prosper, a hope to express self-determination, outside of the shadows of American influence and pressure, the superpower sponsored and promoted wars, manmade disasters and the shock economies and all the other gerrymandering. Perhaps he only can wait and hope that the ghastly country might implode just a little faster on its own violence, greed and burgeoning ignorance. So that finally the other 95.46% of the planet, the rest of the world, might really get on with what is necessary for peace, humanity, and economic survival if not prosperity. Or has the diseas of mindlessness broken out and gone global? Perhaps for us their is time and hope.
But, for you in the US of A I'm afraid that Alexis de Tocqueville in his Democracy in America (1840), was quite accurate when he wrote: "Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd."
You'll be entertained while you are fleeced.
When the economy or some other disaster hits hard enough all the discussions we should have been having about problems will be brushed aside while the new dictator president makes all the decisions. If you don't like it you will have to go through a civil war and a full economic disaster to get back to a hope of democracy.
Wouldn't it just be easier to face issues and find democratic solutions now? Think we should ask Shotgun Dick or Bu$h the inferior?
As an American who has lived overseas, I tell you there is a world of difference in news coverage. I was astounded at how REAL issues were discussed and also how reporters didn't treat politicians or corporate hacks with kid gloves. It was like I had stepped into a completely different world!
Americans truly are insular-- and most of them LIKE it that way. "We" have no idea just how f-ed we are and also, due to our arrogance, indifference and lack of responsibility, how much we are f-ing over everyone else. This is not just the politicians, its not just the corporations, its not just the media. Its the American citizen, most of whom have renounced any sense of responsibility. All that remains is collective narcissism.
Unfortunatly, Lucitanian, I think you're spot on.
Distance from reality is measured by celebrities per capita.
USA = Fantasyland with guns.
Great combination.
I unplugged from U.S. corporate media ten years ago. I've been listening to short wave radio for twenty years, and Radio Havana Cuba is my favorite channel. Free Speech TV on DISH Network is excellent, as is LINK TV most often, and Radio for Peace International has great alternative, counterculture Internet streaming programming.
"She speaks poniards, and every word stabs."
Thank you, everybody, for providing so many good alternative sources of foreign news. This is the internet at its best, providing great service.
Beyond such sharing, though, what can we do? The answer certainly is not to "baby" the shallow trangressors. Neither is it to rant at them.
Consider this: they have huge egos. And what is the greatest weapon against an over-inflated balloon?
That's right. From the beginning I hoped that derision would bring Bush himself down, and in an unexpected way it has. HE wasn't changed since he is missing the change gene altogether (blame Barbara, I think), but an argument could be made that the sheer weight of all the derision finally got through to the general populace, which DOES, it appears,
have some kind of rudimentary conscience.
Use the same method then on our fatuous fruitcakes of the major media.
My nominations for the worst boors ever to appear on Democracy Now: Lou Dobbs and Michael Gordon (he of the New York Times).
I don't have time to check out most of these news sources. As it is, reading CD takes me hours but I thank you.
In addition to CBC and BBC, there are also the other counterparts being aired; on CBC and after midnight anyway. It airs programs from BBC and those from Australia (ABC, I believe) and Africa (maybe also ABC); over radio anyway. I always get them after midnight.
www.globalresearch.ca
ICH, www.InformationClearingHouse.info (if it hasn't changed the .info to .com or something else), also provided from foreign news sources including Aljazeera.
There are other sites, but I'll just mention these two.
I hope you all had the opportunity to watch Bill Moyer's Journal tonight on PBS. Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich had the chance to discuss our failed media and the lack of exposure to their policies and debate on the MSM with Mr Moyer. Our ability to question, in a public and open forum, of all candidates, is in serious jeopardy in this election cycle. Hats off to PBS on this one. And thanks to all abobe for all the alternative news services on the WORLD WIDE WEB. It belongs to us. res nullius.
Good comments by all of you on Jim Lobe's article. Lucitanian...very good analysis!
Bob-1...they do have well written articles.
Sung425...the three websites you mentioned are also informative.
Mike Corbeil...the sites you mentioned are two of the best one's to read and learn from, in my opinion.
Miftin...Dish Network is terrific, and FREE SPEECH TV and LINK TV are two of the finest stations in the world. Also, I may add a radio network...www.kpfa.org...the oldest independent, listenerer supported, ($$$) progressive station in America, since 1949. They are in Berkely, California, and with audio-streaming, the shows can be listened to around the world and CD's and videos can be purchased from them. Check out the program section.
Sung425...I missed the Bill Moyer's show tonight.
A well-informed and educated society is a nation's best hope against a tyrannical government. "Keep em' 'dumbed-down' and everything will be fine" (for the criminals in high places, that is). Ignorance is not bliss, it is unforgivable.
Ezeflyer...please make time to read some of the well-written articles on some of the websites that our fellow Common Dreamers have suggested, many of which you won't even see on CD. Especially the two Mike Corbeil mentioned. On ICH, they start off with several poignant quotes from famous people. (an ezeflyer special)
And now, the New York Times is adding Bill Kristol, the soft-spoken fascist, war-mongering, Zionist, propagandist to it's editorial board. Wake-up America, before it's too late.
Viva White Corporate AmeriKKKa
But after the Democratic-led Congress proved unable to enact a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops in September
unable or unwilling?
Are you telling me there are other countries in this world? Actually, I have long found international news coverage in China, Thailand, France, Canada, The Philippines, among other places, far superior to anything broadcast in the U.S., and far less biased. Even NPR, given over now to the right wing, offers very little beyond the BBC.
I watch BBC World for international news that is more or less fair and balanced. I watch CNN for coverage of Britney Spears, the latest storm to hit Florida or Barney's Christmas video to see what he wants GWB to do next year.