Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
2007 a Year of Weather Records in US
WASHINGTON - When the calendar turned to 2007, the heat went on and the weather just got weirder. January was the warmest first month on record worldwide - 1.53 degrees above normal. It was the first time since record-keeping began in 1880 that the globe's average temperature has been so far above the norm for any month of the year.
And as 2007 drew to a close, it was also shaping up to be the hottest year on record in the Northern Hemisphere.
U.S. weather stations broke or tied 263 all-time high temperature records, according to an Associated Press analysis of U.S. weather data. England had the warmest April in 348 years of record-keeping there, shattering the record set in 1865 by more than 1.1 degrees Fahrenheit.
It wasn't just the temperature. There were other oddball weather events. A tornado struck New York City in August, inspiring the tabloid headline: "This ain't Kansas!"
In the Middle East, an equally rare cyclone spun up in June, hitting Oman and Iran. Major U.S. lakes shrank; Atlanta had to worry about its drinking water supply. South Africa got its first significant snowfall in 25 years. And on Reunion Island, 400 miles east of Africa, nearly 155 inches of rain fell in three days - a world record for the most rain in 72 hours.
Individual weather extremes can't be attributed to global warming, scientists always say. However, "it's the run of them and the different locations" that have the mark of man-made climate change, said top European climate expert Phil Jones, director of the climate research unit at the University of East Anglia in England.
Worst of all - at least according to climate scientists - the Arctic, which serves as the world's refrigerator, dramatically warmed in 2007, shattering records for the amount of melting ice.
2007 seemed to be the year that climate change shook the thermometers, and those who warned that it was beginning to happen were suddenly honored. Former Vice President Al Gore's documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" won an Oscar and he shared the Nobel Peace Prize with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, an international group of thousands of scientists. The climate panel, organized by the United Nations, released four major reports in 2007 saying man-made global warming was incontrovertible and an urgent threat to millions of lives.
Through the first 10 months, it was the hottest year recorded on land and the third hottest when ocean temperatures are included.
Smashing records was common, especially in August. At U.S. weather stations, more than 8,000 new heat records were set or tied for specific August dates.
More remarkably that same month, more than 100 all-time temperature records were tied or broken - regardless of the date - either for the highest reading or the warmest low temperature at night. By comparison only 14 all-time low temperatures were set or tied all year long, as of early December, according to records kept by the National Climatic Data Center.
For example, on Aug. 10, the town of Portland, Tenn., reached 102 degrees, tying a record for the hottest it ever had been. On Aug. 16, it hit 103 and Portland had a new all-time record. But that record was broken again the next day when the mercury reached 105.
Daily triple-digit temperatures took a toll on everybody, public safety director George West recalled. The state had 15 heat-related deaths in August.
Portland was far from alone. In Idaho, Chilly Barton Flat wasn't living up to its name. The weather station in central Idaho tied an all-time high of 100 on July 26, Aug. 7, 14 and 19. During 2007, weather stations in 35 states, from Washington to Florida, set or tied all-time heat records in 2007.
Across Europe this past summer, extreme heat waves killed dozens of people.
And it wasn't just the heat. It was the rain. There was either too little or too much.
More than 60 percent of the United States was either abnormally dry or suffering from drought at one point in August. In November, Atlanta's main water source, Lake Lanier, shrank to an all-time low. Lake Okeechobee, crucial to south Florida, hit its lowest level in recorded history in May, exposing muck and debris not seen for decades. Lake Superior, the biggest and deepest of the Great Lakes, dropped to its lowest August and September levels in history.
Los Angeles hit its driest year on record. Lakes fed by the Colorado River and which help supply water for more than 20 million Westerners, were only half full.
Australia, already a dry continent, suffered its worst drought in a century, making global warming an election issue. On the other extreme, record rains fell in China, England and Wales.
Minnesota got the worst of everything: a devastating June and July drought followed by record August rainfall. In one March day, Southern California got torrential downpours, hail, snow and fierce winds. Then in the fall came devastating fires driven by Santa Ana winds.
And yet none of those events worried scientists as much as what was going on in the Arctic in the summer. Sea ice melted not just to record levels, but far beyond the previous melt record. The Northwest Passage was the most navigable it had been in modern times. Russia planted a flag on the seabed under the North Pole, claiming sovereignty.
The ice sheets that cover a portion of Greenland retreated to an all-time low and permafrost in Alaska warmed to record levels.
Meteorologists have chronicled strange weather years for more than a decade, but nothing like 2007. It was such an extreme weather year that the World Meteorological Organization put out a news release chronicling all the records and unusual developments. That was in August with more than 145 sizzling days to go.
Get used to it, scientists said. As man-made climate change continues, the world will experience more extreme weather, bursts of heat, torrential rain and prolonged drought, they said.
"We're having an increasing trend of odd years," said Michael MacCracken, a former top federal climate scientist, now chief scientist at the Climate Institute in Washington. "Pretty soon odd years are going to become the norm."
© 2007 The Associated Press.



19 Comments so far
Show AllThe weather has been weird for a while but ask Exxon and they will say it's just natural fluctuation.
Seth Borenstein says:And yet none of those events worried scientists as much as what was going on in the Arctic in the summer. Sea ice melted not just to record levels, but far beyond the previous melt record. The Northwest Passage was the most navigable it had been in modern times. Russia planted a flag on the seabed under the North Pole, claiming sovereignty.
Strange how economical viability makes everyone thing that they can stake a claim on Canada's property (cut and pasted from wikipedia):
SANTA CLAUS
NORTH POLE H0H 0H0
CANADA
Now back to more serious stuff - The National had a special on both the adverse environmental consequences and positive economic benefits which may result from an arctic melt called "The Big Melt":
http://www.cbc.ca/national/blog/special_feature/the_big_melt/index.html
"Pretty soon odd years are going to become the norm."
This is the scarest line of the article. Imagine how people, especially those in the U.S., will react to the new norm. Because people here have such short attention spans and because the education system has been taken over by corporate interests who have no incentive to teach history, people will forget how the new normal came about (because of THEIR ACTIONS) and will continue on the path of doing nothing about it.
I'm sorry, dearest Mother Earth - giver of all Life. I'm sorry that we have brought you so much pain. Thank you for your gifts that we have not deserved. Cleanse yourself of us who take such advantage of you - and please forgive us at the same time.
IOWAIRISH: I second the apology to Earth Mother. Last year in North Florida it seemed like an early spring had arrived and flowers began to bloom. Then a frost came in and killed everything. Right now it's close to 80 degrees outside, and that is not normal for winter here. I wonder if it will confuse the trees, the ones given to rest in winter? And if cycles flux between hot and cold, harvest cycles will be interrupted. One can only imagine what it does to animals who are keyed into weather warming cycles to recognize mating time and/or when to begin migrations. This tragedy is not entirely in slow motion, it's almost like a form of mass denial that most people want to continue consuming on, even though the lifespan of that activity is tantamount to mass suicide.
My electric bill this month was $23. Unheard of. I live conservation as much as I can. Bring the same cloth bag to the supermarket, the same plastic container to get the water refill, shop at thrift shops or 2nd hand shops when I need anything, and eat small amounts of food (mostly vegetarian). I bike where I can, but must travel periodically and that is my one regret; although my Toyota is great on mileage. Many in this forum do what they can to cut back, it's those who don't read CD who still let the MSM manufacture their needs (thneeds as Dr. Seuss referred to these false desires) for them.
Nature will replenish and come up with interesting new animal and plant forms, the ones that can adapt to sea saw changes... human kind? That's yet to be determined.
Dear fellow billions of frogs in the Gaia pressure cooker,
Do not worry, we will soon get used to these slight increments of warming. A few percent of a degree warmer each year will quickly become normal, only be prepared for some big leaps once all the ice has been melted. We can happily go on basking in the warmth, wrecking all that was before us away, and burning the coal for maybe a century to come before the only creatures that can survive will be the mythical devils of hell. Eat, drink and be merry for coming new year, there aren't too many of them left. When the going gets tough, we still won't be able to kill ourselves off quickly enough.
Happy new year!
The Arctic ice melt is the most serious problem and it is nothing for me to make any funny or sarcastic comments about. Here is a very recent article on what methane gas releases are capable of. Some top scientists believe the arctic methane may "burp" wihtin as soon as five to ten years. That possibility is most serious and for me at least, puts DU use as number two on a priority list. Which is hard for me to accept. Facts are facts however and 'reality' is just that.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071221222544.htm
Siouxrose,
As to your question about animals & mating cycles, its already happening. In northern Wisconsin the rutting season for deer has gradually (over the last 10-15 years) come later and later, slipping nearly three weeks and impinging upon the usual Thanksgiving hunt. The timing of bird migrations has changed as well. Maple sap is running earlier than anyone can remember up here - not just for one year, but year after year. Bees have died off (possibly related/exacerbated by GW). Invasive species are moving further north, and seem less likely to die off in the winter (previous natural defenses).
I bring this up, since there are many (otherwise) conservative rural voters who have seen these effects firsthand and are questioning the happy-talk heard from right-wing sources. Having left the farm and moved to a liberal town (Madison) I used to get lots of grief for being a "tree hugger" and a Bush basher when I would return. Not anymore. Even some of the small town evangelicals have turned.
Lets hope its not too late.
just saw news story about plastic.plastic now outweighs plankton in the ocean.another fine neocon invention,i agree that we might as well blame everthing on them,why not ?they deserve to be scape-goats ?but on a personal and local and intimate level- something we should all try to do-not use plastics.(as much as possible)
pentagon outlines their stranglehold on all electromagnetic waves....hmmm, what's black and white and red all over ? infra-red polar bears.
With global warming comes the urgent need to build heavier, more powerful private passenger vehicles for the safety and comfort of Americans. Now hiring "extreme weather engineers".
-General Motors
We look forward to the challenge of supplying General Motors with the extra steel reinforcement needed for their vehicles to withstand "extreme weather events" in the coming decades.
- US Steel
Berkshire Hathaway is meeting the "extreme weather event" challenge head on with increased investments in our insurance businesses. We sell peace of mind to anyone who can afford it.
- Warren Buffett
I'm with Warren!
- Hillary Rodham Clinton
This has all happened during a solar minimum. Maybe Dr. Hansen and the climate models are wrong. The point of no return isn't 450 ppm CO2 in 2048. Maybe the point WAS 380 ppm in 2007.
Can't really blame anyone. Bush and the neocons are scoundrels, but we have been heading for this uncharted territory for 200 years. Watt, Fitch, Newton, the Lunar Society, Pasteur... gave us the knowledge and tools to come to this point. Free enterprise gave us the motivation.
I guess the next big shocker will be the solar maximum in a few years at almost 390 ppm CO2. If that doesn't spawn a Kyoto-like agreement with some teeth in it and US participation, we're done. If the currently increasing CO2 and flat methane concentrations start spiking, we're done.
Looks like Edwards is the only candidate with a clue about what is happening and also willing to buck the lobbyists. Maybe he will answer the call in 2012 or so. Will the American public let him? It will be a call for major sacrifices in our lifestyle.
Diversion time. Pats/Giants and PSU/A&M.
HabitatVic, I've had similar experiences in upstate NY. There are mockingbirds breeding here now and I've seen overwintering Carolina wrens, as well.
This summer I went for a walk down an abandoned railroad track that was densely lined with flowers, and flowering shrubs and trees: chicory, Queen Anne's lace, black chokecherry, goldenrod, honeysuckle and etc. The noise from bees should have been practically deafening. The reality of it was that I saw one honeybee and two bumblebees in a three-mile walk through a corridor of flowers in the middle of summer.
You don't have to be a climate scientist to know that something's not quite right. All you have to do is look around you.
HabitatVic:
I guess I should have known my beloved Wisconsin would not be spared by the effects, but though it's great to hear from a fellow (well, I'm an ex- now, ex-patriat, even) Madisonian, most especially that the rural communities are starting to wean themselves of the Koolade, I can only begin to imagine how the north woods are going to change these next few years. Are the bees gone from SoCentral WI as well? I can't imagine a Farmers Market without not only swarms of bees scaring the wits out of allergic people like me, but also swarms of kids sucking on those honey-sticks. Corn is wind-pollenated, so the AgriBusinesses probably don't give a crap that pesticides (exogenous and endogenous) are wiping out the friendlies. Take away everything that isn't wind-pollenated and you've got a pretty bleak situation, delicious fresh sweetcorn notwithstanding.
Gosh how I miss Saturday mornings on the square. It's thoughts like that which get you through the snowy months. Speaking of which, had enough of it this December yet? ;)
rtdrury:
GM: the pitch
USS: the swing
WARren Buffett: the emesis.
Thanks for making me toss my cookies this fine morning. Excellent post.
G.W.Bush = Global Warming Bush
Gee, I was kind of looking forward to the in-house ICH global warming skeptics to post here and explain how this is all just a vast conspiracy by climate scientists and other shadowy powers to hoodwink us.
Actually, I think we would all prefer if global warming turned out to be a phantom but I'm far more suspicious of the motives of the "debunkers" then the advocates. It is, in fact, the vast majority of climate scientists who are the most deeply alarmed about what they see happening in the natural world.
I try to read as much of the "skeptics" arguments as I can but I find the majority unconvincing.
What Really Happened will post the most flimsy and dubious articles attacking "Global Warming" but NEVER posts any of the reasonable arguments that support it. Consequently, I've lost a good deal of respect for the site. It's not that I object to someone holding a different perspective on an issue, rather I object to someone very selectively manipulating evidence and refusing to even present other sides of complex issues.
ICH seems fairly open-minded on a range of issues and it's one of the reasons I recommend it to the politically and economically naïve.
Anyway, since the in-house global warming "debunkers" have failed to post as of yet, let me, in the interests of fair play, post this piece from New Statesmen telling us that global warming has stopped:
http://www.newstatesman.com/200712190004
Of course, the article didn't seem to offer much in the way of evidence.
We do have this:
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/
What is irrefutable is that we have massive loss of glaciations around the world as well as radical melting in the polar region. I'm not sure how to reconcile that with the notion that global warming is a sham or conspiracy.
I have a family member, a cousin—Jeff Dozier--who is an award-winning expert in snow hydrology.
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=18282
He is absolutely certain that global warming is unfolding and sees it in every area of his research. And yet he takes remarkably little interest in the politics of the issue. I can't imagine anyone less likely to engage in political manipulation of data or a conspiracy of scientists.
whoops -- my foolish mistake -- I meant "Common Dreams" --not ICH (which many of you probably also check out on occasion). I haven't had my coffee yet!
Thank you for those links and the fun but very appropriate post MIFTIN.
GLOBAL WARMING ARROGANCE
The US rejections of Kyoto, and now the Bali Conference, underscore the dangerous control that special interests exercise over this administration's policies. Their distortions of scientific data typifies their unconscionable war on science. Evidence linking carbon pollution to warming has long been as close to certain as science can be. Its causes, consequences, and mitigation requirements have been documented by many dedicated environmental organizations including The Union of Concerned Scientists.
Special interests argue that the current warming trends follow historic warming cycles, and hence reflect natural weather patterns--but they omit obvious differences: The earlier warming trends developed at slower rates which permitted the ecosystems to adapt. Morever they resulted from temporary natural events, which allowed transitions back to normal temperature patterns--by contrast, the current warming patterns result from artificial causes that will only intensify unless mitigated.
By all indicators, global warming will self perpetuate as the melting ice sheets absorb rather than reflect heat, as the melting permafrost releases more CO2 & methane, and the list goes on. Inundation of low lying areas, spread of tropical diseases to temperate latitudes, sea life destruction from changing ocean chemistry, & currents, are only some potential consequences.
Often overlooked is the fact that, the same measures needed to mitigate global warming would be necessary even if it were no issue. Conservation, alternative energy development, anti- pollution refinements, etc are essential for other vital environmental reforms such as air and water quality, reductions in toxic waste generation, land preservation, etc.
Contrary to right wing assertions, measures to reduce greenhouse gases could only improve our economy by lessening our trade deficits, and improving our security by reducing our dependance on foreign oil. We could also regain some of our lost world respect that has resulted from our rejection of Kyoto while arrogantly contributing disproportionally to carbon pollution. With our participation in international efforts, China & India could no longer use our non-compliance as an excuse for their non-participation.
The environmental and social damage from our indifference to carbon pollution can only worsen if we allow this administration, guided special interests, to continue their war against our planet.
PACPLYER -- Thank you for the profound (scary) synopsis and crucial knowledge of the truly devastating impact of humankind's folly.
¿Perhaps future generations (if we survive) will learn to mine these floating plastic fields, once the oil runs out, to reverse the polymerization back into fuel?
So many (6 billions) people rely upon the sea for sustenance, either directly or indirectly, and this casts a sour prognosis for the health and vitality of our future generations.
Thank you Captain Charles Moore,
you are one of the Earth's true heroes
Namaste … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … Mahatma Gandhi … … … … … … … … … …
« We must be the change we wish to see in the world »
« There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need but not for man's greed »