Common Dreams NewsCenter
National Conference for Media Reform
 
     
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
     
 

Discuss this story Discuss this story Print This Post Print This Post E-Mail This Article
 
 

Waterproofing Sprays Still Not Studied by Feds

by Eric Lipton

The Consumer Product Safety Commission is unnecessarily leaving the American public at risk through its failure to properly investigate a long-running series of lung injuries tied to widely available waterproofing sprays, public health officials from several states say.1229 02 1

The complaint concerns inexpensive sprays sold nationwide that rely on a water-repelling ingredient that contains a Teflon-like chemical known as a fluoropolymer.

Because the chemical resin is not considered hazardous at this concentration, federal laws do not require that spray-can labels mention its presence, and typically they do not, said Susan Smolinske, a professor of toxicology at Wayne State University in Detroit and the director of a Michigan regional poison control center.

But in the past several years, thousands of consumers are likely to have suffered respiratory problems - including shortness of breath, persistent cough and, in some cases, long-term lung injuries - after using these waterproofing sprays, Smolinske said, citing a smaller number of reports filed with poison control centers.

Most often, the ailment, which is typically diagnosed as chemical pneumonitis, is not life threatening, and it does not appear to be permanent. But in many cases it results in trips to emergency rooms because the resin, once inhaled, can cause inflammation in the lungs, preventing a person from getting enough oxygen.

“Am I like imagining this?” Chrisanne Zolnierek, 49, of Saginaw, Mich., recalled thinking when she had trouble breathing last summer after using Kenyon Water Repellent on a tent she had set up in her yard.

Zolnierek ended up in the intensive care unit instead of on a Boy Scout trip with her 11-year-old son, she said.

In October 2006, the director of the Michigan Department of Community Health, Janet Olszewski, wrote to Nancy Nord, acting chairwoman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, urging her to address the public health issue, one of several such requests.

Henry Spiller, a toxicologist and the director of the Kentucky Regional Poison Center in Louisville, who also has urged the agency to investigate, said: “There really has been no interest or effort to investigate the root cause of this. When we talk to them, we get no action.”

Julie Vallese, a spokeswoman for the product safety commission, said the agency had received such requests and agreed that the topic merited attention. But a shortage of money has prevented it from doing the work, Vallese said.

Congress increased the agency’s budget by nearly 30 percent before adjourning this year. New money may allow research on the products, Vallese said.

“The agency shares the concern of those people on the front line,” she said, referring to emergency room doctors and staffs at poison control centers.

In recent years, the illnesses have been associated with a range of waterproofing products besides Kenyon Water Repellent, including Jobsite Heavy Duty Bootmate, Rocky Boot Weather and Stain Protector, and Stand ‘n Seal grout sealer.

Of those products, the Consumer Product Safety Commission has issued a recall on only one, Stand ‘n Seal, which had been involved in the most severe injuries, including two deaths.

Two of the others, Jobsite and Rocky Boot, were removed from sale last year at the request of Michigan officials.

No one has an accurate count of how many consumers are sickened each year as a result of these sprays. The illnesses are often not attributed to the sprays or recorded properly by poison control centers, preventing a reliable tally, health officials said.

© 2007 Hearst Communications Inc.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Technorati
 

2 Comments so far

  1. Mark Abram December 29th, 2007 4:07 pm

    This one is a no-brainer. Aerosolized toxic chemicals should not be a consumer product. I don’t spray paint, insecticide, oven cleaner, sunscreen, or anything I don’t want in my lungs. You shouldn’t either, and nearly all of these products should be taken off the market - in fact, I can’t think of any that should continue to be sold. Pass a law requiring strict licensing for any product sold with a spray bottle.

    This is a perfect example of something that most people are not afraid of because it is familiar, yet it poses a real and significant health hazard which goes unaddressed even as we obsess over imaginary hazards of cellphones or biotechnology.

  2. Treefrog December 30th, 2007 8:59 pm

    Yeap, most of the people that sell this stuff have no idea what it is either. I always check the VOC rating and avoid things that use neurotoxin as a caution. I use linseed oil to waterproof and protect wood. It is the only product that has a low VOC rating. Unlike what is said when you buy these products they are not sequestered by application. Once in the environment they are a hazard.

Join the discussion:

You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)

 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org