EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
Popular content
Today's Top News
World Food Stocks Dwindling Rapidly, UN Warns
ROME - In an "unforeseen and unprecedented" shift, the world food supply is dwindling rapidly and food prices are soaring to historic levels, the top food and agriculture official of the United Nations warned Monday.
The changes created "a very serious risk that fewer people will be able to get food," particularly in the developing world, said Jacques Diouf, head of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization.
The agency's food price index rose by more than 40 percent this year, compared with 9 percent the year before - a rate that was already unacceptable, he said. New figures show that the total cost of foodstuffs imported by the neediest countries rose 25 percent, to $107 million, in the last year.
At the same time, reserves of cereals are severely depleted, FAO records show. World wheat stores declined 11 percent this year, to the lowest level since 1980. That corresponds to 12 weeks of the world's total consumption - much less than the average of 18 weeks consumption in storage during the period 2000-2005. There are only 8 weeks of corn left, down from 11 weeks in the earlier period.
Prices of wheat and oilseeds are at record highs, Diouf said Monday. Wheat prices have risen by $130 per ton, or 52 percent, since a year ago. U.S. wheat futures broke $10 a bushel for the first time Monday, the agricultural equivalent of $100 a barrel oil. (Page 16)
Diouf blamed a confluence of recent supply and demand factors for the crisis, and he predicted that those factors were here to stay. On the supply side, these include the early effects of global warming, which has decreased crop yields in some crucial places, and a shift away from farming for human consumption toward crops for biofuels and cattle feed. Demand for grain is increasing with the world population, and more is diverted to feed cattle as the population of upwardly mobile meat-eaters grows.
"We're concerned that we are facing the perfect storm for the world's hungry," said Josette Sheeran, executive director of the World Food Program, in a telephone interview. She said that her agency's food procurement costs had gone up 50 percent in the past 5 years and that some poor people are being "priced out of the food market."
To make matters worse, high oil prices have doubled shipping costs in the past year, putting enormous stress on poor nations that need to import food as well as the humanitarian agencies that provide it.
"You can debate why this is all happening, but what's most important to us is that it's a long-term trend, reversing decades of decreasing food prices," Sheeran said.
Climate specialists say that the vulnerability will only increase as further effects of climate change are felt. "If there's a significant change in climate in one of our high production areas, if there is a disease that effects a major crop, we are in a very risky situation," said Mark Howden of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization in Canberra.
Already "unusual weather events," linked to climate change - such as droughts, floods and storms - have decreased production in important exporting countries like Australia and Ukraine, Diouf said.
In Southern Australia, a significant reduction in rainfall in the past few years led some farmers to sell their land and move to Tasmania, where water is more reliable, said Howden, one of the authors of a recent series of papers in the Procedings of the National Academy of Sciences on climate change and the world food supply.
"In the U.S., Australia, and Europe, there's a very substantial capacity to adapt to the effects on food - with money, technology, research and development," Howden said. "In the developing world, there isn't."
Sheeran said, that on a recent trip to Mali, she was told that food stocks were at an all time low. The World Food Program feeds millions of children in schools and people with HIV/AIDS. Poor nutrition in these groups increased the risk serious disease and death.
Diouf suggested that all countries and international agencies would have to "revisit" agricultural and aid policies they had adopted "in a different economic environment." For example, with food and oil prices approaching record, it may not make sense to send food aid to poorer countries, but instead to focus on helping farmers grow food locally.
FAO plans to start a new initiative that will offer farmers in poor countries vouchers that can be redeemed for seeds and fertilizer, and will try to help them adapt to climate change.
The recent scientific papers concluded that farmers could adjust to 1 degree Celsius (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) to 3 degrees Celsius (5.4 degrees) of warming by switching to more resilient species, changing planting times, or storing water for irrigation, for example.
But that after that, "all bets are off," said Francesco Tubiello, of Columbia University Earth Institute. "Many people assume that we will never have a problem with food production on a global scale, but there is a strong potential for negative surprises."
In Europe, officials said they were already adjusting policies to the reality of higher prices. The European Union recently suspended a "set-aside" of land for next year - a longstanding program that essentially paid farmers to leave 10 percent of their land untilled as a way to increase farm prices and reduce surpluses. Also, starting in January, import tariffs on all cereal will be eliminated for six months, to make it easier for European countries to buy grain from elsewhere. But that may make it even harder for poor countries to obtain the grain they need.
In an effort to promote free markets, the European Union has been in the process of reducing farm subsidies and this has accelerated the process.
"It's much easier to do with the new economics," said Michael Mann a spokesman for the EU agriculture commission. "We saw this coming to a certain extent, but we are surprised at how quickly it is happening."
But he noted that farm prices the last few decades have been lower than at any time in history, so the change seems extremely dramatic.
Diouf noted that there had been "tension and political unrest related to food markets" in a number of poor countries this year, including Morocco, Senegal and Mauritania. "We need to play a catalytic role to quickly boost crop production in the most affected countries," he said.
Part of the current problem is an outgrowth of prosperity. More people in the world now eat meat, diverting grain from humans to livestock. A more complicated issue is the use of crops to make biofuels, which are often heavily subsidized. A major factor in rising corn prices globally is that many farmers in the United States are now selling their corn to make subsidized ethanol.
Mann said the European Union had intentionally set low targets for biofuel use - 10 per cent by 2020 - to limit food price rises and that it plans to import some biofuel. "We don't want all our farmers switching from food to biofuel," he said.
© International Herald Tribune
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

33 Comments so far
Show AllI am thrilled to be a Vegan.
It's time for people to wake up about their diets.
We could make it a crime to sell dead animals. Can't people understand that's what they are eating? Imagine feeding your cat or dog in a cage for all of its life, giving it lots of chemicals to grow big and strong and then eating it. I guess the sheeple (google it) will just keep doing what they are told. Must get that Earth destroying protein and chemicals that don't leave the animal's body into their body. Makes getting cancer easier and cuts down on the food supply for the starving world. Keep the fun coming and a "A Merry Canmas" for only MerryCans.
Why should inferior people - the poor, blacks, poeple of non Christian cultures - eat when westerners need cheap fuel? The world needs to priotise and gasoline for the west must come first.
I think the prices keep going up for a reason. In the usa(welfare to the world) I see weekly price increases. I think the corps are trying to see how much they can squeeze from the little guy. It matters not to them that 3/4s of the food ends up being pulled from the shelves.
I think it is moved on down the food chain for a profit for the stores. They probablly just change the expiration date which is generally good for a month or more after.
On mark down tables the prices are marked down little or if at all. The leftover goes somewhere for profit.
Well put cheencheen.Same thing here in British Columbia, home to some of the worlds finest apples.We import them from all over the world.We also have items on our local shelves Iran,Iraq and Lebanon as well as Israel.When i first started in the grocery business imported items were few and far between but that was back in 1979. Since then people seem to think of it as a right to consume whatever they want without giving thought to where it came from or who grew it.I do take comfort though that the days are near that we will be forced to grow a lot of what we eat ourselves.Im, for one, looking forward to it....although i dont have a green thumb and i hate gardening.Although this methane gas/ global warming stuff is worrisome.All our individual valiant efforts may end up for naught.
I know, lets feed our cars before our people
looks like the world's food stocks are as tight as the worlds money stocks ;) trickle down (my arse)
In America we have a huge set-aside program of conservation reserve land. We should begin putting this back in production with perennial crops such as alfalfa and switchgrass to avoid leaving the ground bare and open to erosion. We all could try to eat a little less meat also. If everyone tried to consume a bit less of meat, fuel, etc, we would all be better off.
When the methane gas in the Arctic burps up into the atmosphere in as little as five years, it will solve the problem. There is nothing to worry about.
If that doesn't kill everyone on the planet, the 'continuing' loss of the oceans phytoplankton will. Here is a link to support that comment. It is very brief and to the point.
http://whyplankton.com/
Birth control, hemp and direct democracy! Or we'll kill each other.
Yes, please, let's use our conservation lands and further kill off whatever natural environment we have left. Or is that just an illusion?
Become a Locavore and kill ConAgra.
"and a shift away from farming for human consumption toward crops for biofuels and cattle feed. Demand for grain is increasing with the world population, and more is diverted to feed cattle as the population of upwardly mobile meat-eaters grows."
**this is exactly what the author of Diet for a Small Planet warned of in 1969.
And more cattle means more global warming, deforestation, wasted water, and untold suffering.
A meat diet is the planet killer.
This statement is key to addressing this problem:
"For example, with food and oil prices approaching record, it may not make sense to send food aid to poorer countries, but instead to focus on helping farmers grow food locally.
FAO plans to start a new initiative that will offer farmers in poor countries vouchers that can be redeemed for seeds and fertilizer, and will try to help them adapt to climate change."
Globilization of food supplies (and profits) by companies like ADM, Monsanto, Cargill have driven local farmers from the land and made it impossible for countries to feed themselves, including the U.S. Access to open pollenated seeds suited to each growing area have dwindled or been bastardized by GMO's and hybrid commercial seed stocks.
Returning to local food production across the planet is our only hope. We have to start now to undo what the mega corporations, in collusion with governments, have wrought in the past 20 years.
Support your local farmers in every way you can. That means also paying attention to the current Farm Bill. Which is an absolute travesty in its current form. The whole thing needs to be repealed!
Oh, and stockpile those good seeds to plant in the spring in your garden, a community garden, or your neighbor's back yard. You and your community are going to need them.
Thank you, rebel farmer!!!
You took the words right out of my mouth. Local food supply is so vital. It angers me to no end when I go to the supermarket in Michigan, United States and I see apples from New Zealand. Michigan... home to hundreds of local apple orchards!!!! Shipping crops across the world like this is complete insanity when it can be grown in your own backyard.
In the developing countries much of the land that used to be cultivated by local farmers has been stolen or "bought" by huge companies seeking to mine, build highways, build tourist developments, or create plantations that grow things like coffee or biofuel for rich overseas consumers. It's a shame.
Then "food aid" really consists of giant subsidies for agribusiness to ship free food over to places like Africa, where whatever local farmers are left go out of business because they can't compete with subsidized free food. Thus, more people are dependent on agribusiness and huge subsidies to feed them, instead of being able to grow the food themselves.
I question what this FAO seed and fertilizer voucher plan is. I fear that it may consist of GM seeds and corresponding fertilizer from agribusiness, so that these farmers are depending on GM seeds instead of storing their own native seed stocks. Hopefully this is not the case, but so often "food aid" is actually a masked plan to subsidize agribusiness and bring them higher profits while poor farmers lose control over their food supply.
I agree with everybody here... direct democracy, hemp, eat less meat, use less fuel, start a community garden... please do all and any of these things you can! These are direct actions for us to get these things done ourselves instead of waiting for corrupt politicians to do it. And as far as the politicians go... if you are in the U.S. harass the hell out of them over the disastrous U.S. Farm Bill, which will further subsidize agribusiness and kill small family farms.
Irish: Excellent observations. And you are absolutely right about some of the problems. And true again, we have already probably passed the point of no return. Thing is that we have to try to survive during this period of time before the whole thing collapses. And the simplification that is needed will be forced down the peoples' throat whether they like it or not. There ain't goin' to be much food on the shelves of the supermarkets, no fast food joints with super sized anything, and they ain't gonna have much money for toys. That leaves us with the original problem of what are we goin' to do to feed ourselves.
Be prepared and good luck!
What do we mean by 'locally grown'? Within fifty miles? Most people in the developed countries eat between two thousand and three thousand calories each day. Much of these calories come from sugars, fats and oils. Are sugar beets, sugar cane, olive oil, corn oil etc. produced within fifty miles of where you live in quantities large enough to feed the local population? Probably not. How about coffee beans, tea, citrus fruits, bananas, coconut, tree nuts, peanuts etc. etc. If you actually tried to subsist on locally grown food stuffs you would find your diet drastically narrowed. And for much of the year you would have to eat foods preserved by canning, drying, smoking, salting or pickling. Wheat, a staple of the diet in the U.S.A., is mainly grown west of the Mississippi river in places with sparse populations. Vegetables are only one of the important food groups for a healthy balanced diet. Anyone who thinks that they can purchase a few acres in the countryside and grow their own food has never given the idea careful consideration.
Ok. The biggest problem in all this is world overpopulation complicated by consumption complicated by increasing accumulation of wealth.
First, we have to face this: rich or poor, we probably won't be able to outsmart war, famine and disease (the typical population-reducers), and we won't be able to avoid them, either.
Then we must face this: humans seem unwilling or unable to impose meaningful limits on global and personal reproduction, consumption, ownership of natural resources and accumulation of wealth. Let's quit ranting on each other and face this fact.
And we humans are also REALLY good at tricking ourselves.
So why not use tools like fiscal and monetary policy that can be designed and used to automatically impose limits? Time for nations to stop subsidizing children with tax breaks for their parents. Time for some kind of energy tax to replace income taxes. Time to stop letting private hands own natural resources. Time to progressively tax individual net worth at progressively higher rates. This can all be done while still rewarding hard work, value-added efforts, ingenuity etc. because the products of our work and ingenuity are not themselves taxed. It can be done through regulated capitalism, not socialism. But we will eventually have to give up private ownership of land. If we want to talk about crimes against humanity, or crimes against nature, private land ownership is probably the biggest. Actually, many of us "small" landowners already rent our land anyway -- from the mortgage company or bank!
Anyway, if we cannot regulate ourselves, then why not intelligently engineer the system that motivates us?
All we have to do is agree on some boundaries -- how much net worth is enough? Who "owns" the earth's resources? How much carbon do we want in the atmosphere? etc.
The Bicycle is the answer...
hemp in the fields
thc to the war mongers
"Oh Lord,
grant me the serenity to accept what I cannot change, the courage to change what I can, and..."
Can anyone finish this?
KAYAKER, very good points.
We've had an acre organic garden plot and have raised a goodly amount of our food. Well, this year we didn't harvest enough for sharing, canning or storing any, there weren't any bees, humming birds or butterflies of any types or numbers in our area of the southwest this year.
But anyway, when we did have excellent crops, we raised a variety of pumpkins and squash, tomatoes, sweet potatoes, carrots, string and lima beans, turnips, peppers, kale, brocolli, salad greens and herbs of course, onions, garlic, cabbage and of course lots of flowers of many varieties.
We always plant half an acre with a soybean-alfalfa mix, to turn in for green fertilizer for the next year. We always canned at least 50 quarts of tomatoes, beans, carrots and squash and canned two dozen jars of sweet pickels, using zucchi squash. Yummy, and our neighbors love us.
We stored pumpkins, squash, turnips, onions and sweet potatoes. We dried herbs, tomatoes peppers and cut flowers. It was work, but very enjoyable work and our food was "good" food. You cannot buy such good tasting vegetables in super markets. Ad sad to say a ot of the vendors at farmers markets are selling veggies that the super market brokers refused to accept from long haul truckers for a variety of reasons. Beware what you buy from farmers markets, some is very good, some is not so hot.
However, you are correct, we needed flour for baking bread and rolls, we need oil, sugar, salt, spices, pepper, coffee and my natural peanut butter, mayonaisse and eggs, (We no longer raise chickens, because of the mountain lions, foxes and caota-mundi. An adult mountain lion can scale an 18 foot fence in a single bound. They do keep the coyotes away, we don't have those in our mountain valley.
Yes, one can raise vegetables, if the weather permits, if one has ample water and has the time, energy and decent soil, doesn't have a plague of inscets. Raising Idaho or Maine potatoes and or some other vegetables, such as celery is not that easy and will bring potatoe bugs, you also need the right soil conditions if you want good spuds etc. Then you have to have a good storage area to prevent spoilage.
So for any to think that small garden plots will supply their needs, it just isn't so. But it certainly does help and one can sure try it. It ain't free food either, but often less costly than the stores. ___ Unless, you don't get the birds and bees, or have a family of gophers move in overnight, or a hail storm that flattens it all.
It takes time and you learn from your mistakes, it's experience and having a real good book to study on the subject. One can plant seeds in a gravel driveway and the plants will florish if watered, you might not harvest a lot of fruit from the plants though.
The major problem is, due to the government giving tax breaks and other incintives to the mega farmers, and ignoring those like REBEL FARMER, they and we all suffer. The small 20-40 acre farmers are about all gone. That's how it is ___ for us anyway.
"And the wisdom to know the difference".
That is sometimes the hard part for me GULIPER.
I'm fairly sure someone may tell me, I don't need coffee, Well, I also purchase Postum, cocoa and tea, catfood and litter, and I enjoy my coffee, bourbon and wine.__ We don't grow those, or mustard, crackers, olives and kippered herring. ___ We can do without those of course. If we think the price of food is high now, just wait awhile, Bush will insure it goes up lots more.
ALOHA!!
I am a farmer who used to be an electrical contractor in the San Francisco, CA area. My wife and I got sick of the BS and decided to simplify our lives and live off the Earth instead of SafeWay ... so we moved to Hawaii!
Here in the jungles of the Big Island there is abundant, clean air and water every day. Things grow without human intervention, naturally, like the Garden Of Eden! A one mile walk to the ocean and there is all the protein one could want. There are no predators here and no snakes. Plenty of bees and an abundance of warm sunshine nearly all year round ... Places like this are priceless and I believe the coming years will bare that out ... The direction the USA and the World is going is the exact resason we moved here in the first place ...
I fully support local farming and it thrives here in Hawaii! As the USA is so dependent on imports of all types these imports will rise in price dramatically as the US Peso sinks in value. We have exported any sort of manufacturing including farming. Now what? That's the downside of the global economy isn't it?
You guys forget about the "supply chain" for groceries is only four days. Katrina showed New Orleans the importance of that fact ... Never mind the high cost of food and gas as the article points out very clearly it is now all about supply!
It wasn't that long ago that Russia and China had to buy wheat and other grains from the USA back in the 1970s when we were exporters. Now the USA needs to import food. With the crop prices depressed due to stock market futures manipulation US farmers were put out of business and their land bought by ADM or confiscated by banks ... Remember FARM AID?
We Americans have made our beds ...
ezeflyer for president!
(I like his reefer-for-all platform!)
nmeyer wrote:
Anyway, if we cannot regulate ourselves, then why not intelligently engineer the system that motivates us?
All we have to do is agree on some boundaries — how much net worth is enough? Who "owns" the earth's resources? How much carbon do we want in the atmosphere? etc.
It doesn't work that way. If we can't regulate ourselves, no tinkering with the system will help. Self-responsible individuals are the only answer...and there is no way to teach, regulate or systemize responsible behavior. Responsible behavior is much more related to free-will and individual choice than systemized control. What we need is a critical mass of self-responsible humans on this planet, but we are far from it. Apocalypse...here we come.
kelmer wrote:
And more cattle means more global warming, deforestation, wasted water, and untold suffering. A meat diet is the planet killer.
Yeah..but remember it is not politically correct to judge a meateater. Thank Buddha, for PETA and its willingness to confront climate preachers like Al Gore who refuse to address the diet issue in any meaningful way.
Make the towns attractive, give suburbs back to organic farms, abolish the private auto. Free Public Transit.
http://www.frepubtra.blogspot.com/
Judith for peace wrote: "I am thrilled to be a Vegan. It's time for people to wake up about their diets."
Good on you for thinking about your diet! But I have some misgivings about mixing "religion" and diet, and in my experience, self-described vegans are the most religious.
I believe it is more important to eat close to the earth, and avoid absolutes. It is better to have your own goat milk than to drink soy milk from beans grown in Iowa, processed in California, packaged in Texas, and shipped to your local supermarket. It is better to have your own free-range, organic eggs than to eat tofu that has traveled a similar path to the soy milk described above.
And yes, even though we are vegetarians, it is better to eat limited quantities of self-butchered meat from animals that have had happy lives than to assemble the necessary components of a healthy vegan diet from around the globe. Think of the impact of manufacturing, packaging, transporting, and marketing B12 supplements alone!
I have the unpleasant task of butchering several roosters this weekend, that we raised from chicks. We are committed to eating at least one, as a symbolic gesture of thanks to the creature and the earth, and will distribute the rest to our non-vegetarian friends who are trying to eat locally.
Permaculture teaches that we value animals for the multiple layers of service they provide to us and the land. While veganism is laudable from an ethical point of view, it ignores that even in our benign neglect, we have an impact on the animal kingdom. I live in an area this is overrun by deer, making agriculture difficult -- eight-foot fencing is expensive! Although I'm against "sport hunting," we should either re-introduce natural predators, or harvest many of the deer. Look at India, people starving while the countryside is over-run with well-fed cattle.
By stressing a systems approach, and by recognizing that animals are a natural part of every ecosystem, Permaculture is at odds with strict veganism. Put more strongly, strict veganism is not, from my training and research, sustainable.
Again, the presence of mind that goes into the decision to be vegan is laudable, but I think there is a bigger picture to consider. With the exception of our own eggs and occasional local honey, we strive to be "fregan," meaning we eat close to vegan as we can, while not wasting the "free" nutrition from lovingly tended animals that provide a number of services to the earth and its creatures beyond being raised simply for their meat.
evelyna December writes: "I think the prices keep going up for a reason. In the usa (welfare to the world) I see weekly price increases. I think the corps are trying to see how much they can squeeze from the little guy."
As long as we can point the finger elsewhere, the problem will not be resolved.
Prices are going up because modern agriculture uses soil as a sponge with which to turn fossil fuel into food. And fossil fuel is peaking, and will soon decline.
Driving a few miles to buy a loaf of bread uses as much energy as is in that loaf of bread.
The answer lies within: grow as much of your own food as you can, buy the rest locally, and stop (or drastically reduce) your use of fossil fuel.
kayaker wrote: "Anyone who thinks that they can purchase a few acres in the countryside and grow their own food has never given the idea careful consideration."
I agree if you insert "all" after "grow."
But certainly, one can make a start, even in a suburban setting. My brother creates wonderful tomatoes and beans on a quarter-acre lot -- enough to can and freeze for the winter for their family of four, with enough zucchini left over to bring into the office and give away for free!
People who say it can't be done should not interfere with those who are doing it. :-)
OFF TOPIC: indeepshiitake (or anyone else who knows), how are you putting italics in your post? It strips the HTML I put in. Is this a [b]BBCODE[/b] site? I often want to add some styling and links to my posts, but have been thwarted so far.
Jan,
I highly appreciate your contribution to this discourse as you make several good observations.
However, I do think it is little dangerous to make a blanket assumption that self-described vegans are not aware of these issues. There are vegans out there who see the big picture...Robert Hart was one of them. Also, there is ample evidence that veganic growing methods that rely on green manures, crop rotation, veggie compost are sustainable. Eliot Coleman is one fellow who farms veganically.
Incorporating humanure compost into your soil fertility regimen will add another level of sustainability to your farm.
You raise the question about whether or not it would be better to introduce higher-chain predators to deal with deer overpopulation issues. As a vegan, I would emphatically say yes to reintroducing wolves, panthers and other predators. It seems much more natural to me to let these carnivores do the culling, rather than humans using their cowardly riflles and shotguns. In a way, we are interfering with the process of natural selection which allows the strongest, most agile individuals of the species to survive. With the higher predators around, there would be less incentive for raising domesticated animals on deforested land. Bringing back the predators means bringing back the forests.
I don't believe in "religious" veganism. I think animals can be incorporated into human society in a humane way. For example, I don't see why using horses/oxen for transportation/hauling goods is so bad. And why not use ducks for slug control and eggs and sheep for wool. If there is a horse farm nearby, by all means take advantage of all that manure to increase your soil fertility.
Then again, this implies that we are asking animals do something against their will. I believe there are alternatives to pretty much anything that will obviate the use of animals. For example, bikes and bike trailors work really well for transportation. No-till farming practices (Emilia Hazelip comes to mind) can be done 100% with human power. A scythe works great for cutting hay mulch.
As a vegan for many years, I find that it is very important for me to supplement with B12 and omega 3 fatty acids (from flaxseed) I get both of these in capsule form. Theoretically though it is possible to get my B12 from eating insects (which doesn't seem so bad) and omega 3 can be gotten from growing my own flax (or maybe i'll have to eat eggs or small fish which doesn't seem so bad...making me non-vegan).
Anyway, taking a couple of capsules a day should not be viewed as cancelling out the benefits of a vegan diet, especially if it is based in local organic foods.
Next, let me say that an unsustainably vegan diet is much less of an evil than an unsustainable diet high in meat. So when people say GO VEGAN, it makes sense regardless of whether or not you understand sustainability.
Next, if we were to attempt to convert the food production in the US to a sustainable system to support 300 million people, it is highly doubtful that there would be enough locally available land to support even a small fraction of the demand for meat and other animal products. I think 99% of Americans identify as non-vegan.
Lastly, I want to say that the ethical component to veganism is in itself a very important aspect to promoting sustainability. If we can learn to see other animals as more than just tools for our own survival, perhaps this will help us cultivate a new relationship with the natural world. Can you imagine what this world would like if we viewed murdering a human being as the same level of crime as killing another mammal, fish, or bird? We are really not so far removed from other mammals genetically and emotionally yet we treat them so much differently than our own.
If we take sustainability to its ultimate conclusion, we can conclude that it would make sense to not only let old and mentally handicapped people to die since they are a great strain on carrying capacity, but also we would need to reduce our human numbers to about 1 billion or so on the planet. But is committing genocide against our own people really sustainable. How could the human heart sustain such a crime against itself?
In conclusion, I would have to say that true sustainability is rooted not only in a holistic understanding of ecological systems but also in loving respect for the spiritual dimensions which are the foundation of the physical world. To kill a squealing pig that was raised "sustainably" is to kill a part of yourself.
We humans are the rulers of our planet by means of our intelligence not our spirit. We are a predator that knows no limit. All other species exist at our imperial mercy. We refuse to permit equal ownership of resources yet we are the worst of stewards.
I think it is time we honor the free will of other animals as much or more than we honor ourselves. Maybe, they still belong to this planet by virtue of their lack of ego and non-separateness from the natural world, and it is time for us to take leave.