Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
UK Has Left Behind Murder and Chaos, Says Basra Police Chief
The full scale of the chaos left behind by British forces in Basra was revealed yesterday as the city's police chief described a province in the grip of well-armed militias strong enough to overpower security forces and brutal enough to behead women considered not sufficiently Islamic.
As British forces finally handed over security in Basra province, marking the end of 4½ years of control in southern Iraq, Major General Jalil Khalaf, the new police commander, said the occupation had left him with a situation close to mayhem. "They left me militia, they left me gangsters, and they left me all the troubles in the world," he said in an interview for Guardian Films and ITV.
Khalaf painted a very different picture from that of British officials who, while acknowledging problems in southern Iraq, said yesterday's handover at Basra airbase was timely and appropriate.
Major General Graham Binns, who led British troops into the city in 2003, said the province had "begun to regain its strength". He added: "I came to rid Basra of its enemies and I now formally hand Basra back to its friends."
But in the film, to be broadcast on the Guardian Unlimited website and ITV News, Khalaf lists a catalogue of failings, saying:
· Basra has become so lawless that in the last three months 45 women have been killed for being "immoral" because they were not fully covered or because they may have given birth outside wedlock;
· The British unintentionally rearmed Shia militias by failing to recognise that Iraqi troops were loyal to more than one authority;
· Shia militia are better armed than his men and control Iraq's main port.
In the interview he said the main problem the Iraqi security forces now faced was the struggle to wrest control back from the militia. He appealed for the British to help him do that: "We need the British to help us to watch our borders - both sea and land and we need their intelligence and air support and to keep training the Iraqi police."
David Miliband, the foreign secretary, who attended the handover ceremony, acknowledged that the territory was not "a land of milk and honey" and promised Britain would remain a "committed friend" of Iraq.
But he insisted it was the right time to hand back control. "The key conditions for the transfer of security responsibility to the Iraqi security forces are whether they are up to it: do they have the numbers? Do they have the leadership and training to provide leadership for this province? And the answer to those three questions is yes," he said.
After the handover Des Browne, the defence secretary, praised British forces - 174 of whom have died since the start of the war in March 2003. "Their contribution has been outstanding and their courage inspiring," he said. A scaled-down UK force will remain in a single base at Basra airport, with a small training mission and a rapid reaction team on "overwatch".
Britain now has 4,500 troops in Iraq. The prime minister, Gordon Brown, has said numbers would shrink to 2,500 by mid-2008 though those released may be redeployed to Afghanistan.
Khalaf, who has survived 20 assassination attempts since he became police chief six months ago, said Britain's intentions had been good but misguided. "I don't think the British meant for this mess to happen. When they disbanded the Iraqi police and military after Saddam fell the people they put in their place were not loyal to the Iraqi government. The British trained and armed these people in the extremist groups and now we are faced with a situation where these police are loyal to their parties not their country."
He said the most shocking aspect of the breakdown of law and order in Basra was the murder of women for being unIslamic. "They are being killed because they are accused of behaving in an immoral way. When they kill them they put underwear and indecent clothes on them."
In his office Khalaf showed the Guardian a computer holding the files of 48 unidentified women. "Some of them have even been killed with their children because their killer says that they come out of an adulterous relationship," he said.
Vince Cable, the acting Lib Dem leader, called for a timetable to bring all British troops home from Iraq, adding: "If we are handing power back to the Iraqis, why are 4,500 British troops needed for what is essentially a training mission?"
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2007



32 Comments so far
Show AllMurder and chaos? I thought Bush had arranged with God to grant them freedom and democracy? Has their oil at least been privatized? Mission Accomplished.
The cut and run Brits.
More ammo for the reich wing bloodlusters to claim we must remain in Iraq for the duration.
My my, the pandora's box the little boy king has opened.
Didn't he listen to his daddy, who warned him of the pitfalls of occupying a "bitter and hostile land".?
Apparently not
Wait till we leave!
Hey, here's "real hot news flash." W and the damn neo cons started this damn war, and as Stuart Symington said in a retort to Joseph McCarthy in the Army McCarthy hearings, "Some people just want anarchy." Now the neo cons can blow smoke about the British.
Uncle Sam's Iraqi puppet government is sure as hell no friend of the Iraqi people with all that government's backing of rape, torture, pillaging, and mass killing of the Iraqi people on behalf of the neo con mad dogs.
They left them with a land that is so horribly polluted with DU, that every person over there is already suffering from radiation poisoning. Of course there are still a few American and Blackwter troops in Iraq, but they won't be there for any length of time. How in Hell did we ever allow this?
Oh, I almost forgot. We had to catch Osama bin Laden and kill Sadam.__ "God" said so.
Well, nothing new here. The British have a long history of conquest, oppression, and withdrawal, only to leave ruined countries.
A war was fought and won ostensibly to break free of the oppressive ways of the British (and add the Spanish too). How much like them we've become.
It's came time for these people to step up to the plate and sort out their own affairs.
Now they have the chance to stand up and be counted and all they do is whine like little girls....
This is what these people are really like...
Thank you heaven and all thats almighty for getting Britain and it's troops out of Iraq...
just got to get out of Afghanistan now !!!!!!!!
The British left the US, and look what a mess we've become also.
Sorry, I couldn't resist...
Like I said, you're going need some peace keepers there (although not the US or the Brits who have a terrible history in the area as well,IMO) or it's going to make Kosovo look like a pillow fight.
I have been hearing DK talking more about an international peace keeping force so he's covering the bases.
So it's either more US troops or longer stays, or trying to get the UN to muster something through apologetic diplomacy. We'll see how this plays out.
As an ex-British serviceman I'm not surprised our troops left after our criminal P.M. went AWOL. Brown is now left to clear up the mess Blair created and the Dems. will have the same task in the USA.
The lesson will not be learned the sheeple will be out in the streets shouting for blood and waving bloody great flags when the next 9/11 is organised by some future neo.con warmonger.
The reason I know that is because most kids get indoctrinated with false patriotism and religion, very few escape the net and become free thinkers, just look round the USA and count the churches.
"he reason I know that is because most kids get indoctrinated with false patriotism and religion, very few escape the net and become free thinkers, just look round the USA and count the churches."
totally true!even in liberal seattle, the churches here sprout up like weeds, all worshipping their mythical fabricated "savior"
Forcing Democracy upon others works great, wouldn't you say?
What the Brits have left behind in Basra is just what we're going to be leaving behind, whether we leave now or five years from now. Better now than then.
You did a heckuva job, Bushie.
Guess he forced OUR Democracy on them, We don't have it anymore.
Hmmm, you did not think that any info about England's departure from Iraq was going to be favorable. The propaganda keeps on spinning...
I wonder how many U.S. paid mercenaries contractors are running around causing the chaos. Sounds and looks like a well organized charade to keep Iraq destabilized. "Hey we need another 40 billion to help liberate the Iraqis!"
These are your federal tax dollars at work. How many hours have you worked to pay for this mistake? How many more will you have to work to keep paying for this mistake?
Look at it this way. You are a major shareholder (citizen) in a large powerful corporation (America). Your CEO (Bush) and chairperson (Cheney) are making decisions that are draining the life out of the company (your country). We can not continue down this path.
The Brit's were just able to face the facts before we ever will. America will be bankrupt long before Iraq will be liberated.
Pretty much how the Brits did things in India too, at least they are consistent. But it's a loose loose situation any way you do it. Americans will have to bite that bullet eventually too.
Everything you wrote was correct WDMAX, except I believe we are already bankrupt.
as ive said again and again..........the invasion of iraq sent the progressive women of iraq straight back to the stone-age,straight back to hell on earth.bush's buddies,the arab states had everything to gain,since they didnt want their womenfolk getting 'uppity' like those iraqian women...i am sure iran was very pleased,as well.cheney and bush have a vested interest in saudi arabia,the emirates and even egypt,i think they did it for the sake of their stake in the arab world.
NAYOIBI -- Right-ON!!
You can take that to the BANK
(that controlling woman is more important than OIL)
Namaste … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … Mahatma Gandhi … … … … … … … … … …
« We must be the change we wish to see in the world »
« There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need but not for man's greed »
Paul Bramscher December 17th, 2007 3:43 pm
Paul,
Not to change the subject, but I just ran across this article and believe it was information you were looking for recently.
http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/gnazzo/2007/1217.html
To wit they have accomplished their mission.
They went there along with US for that very purpose
Controlling oil would most definently be easier.
Ha!
this is a war about woman and the hands that rock the cradles...and it is a war about water.the rich arab nations have all the oil they could ever want or need....what they did NOT HAVE,was water..........
Regardless of how long we stay in Iraq. It's going to be the same kind of mess when when we leave. There is never going to be any end to it regardless of what the neocon's think. It's sad that Bush had to invade them and take away any semblance of stability that they have had in centuries. The only way it will ever cure itself is when another dictator like Saddam comes along and starts his reign of terror again. Or the Islamic Fundamentalist's do and bring something like the Taliban to the region. But, we can continue to waste billions in the region and it's never going to be any different than it is is Basra today. So why bother?
why bother ?you didnt really believe that bush was using all our military might and all our cash and resources to benefit america and americans ????hell no,this is all about bush and his cronies such as halliburton and the rich shieks of arabia.and our so called leaders and and evangelical phonies gave the criminals carte blanche to waste american lives and american resources...ALL FOR THE BENEFIT OF A CROOKED FEW !all the assholes that believed bush was some kind of born-again christian and patriot,are just very ignorant blowhards that never did a lick of research or background checking into the lives of these thiefs that came here after ww2,with full intention of infiltration and pilfering control away from our people and our best interests.saddam was evil,no argument there,but his citizens were well educated and progressively striving,during his regime....with the exception of the kurds,they only had it half/bad.now iraq is a wasteland,its ground poison,its water,diverted,but under the ruined earth OIL still flows straight into the open arms of halliburton and the bush masters.......
The only way that crappy country was held together was to have a murderous despot like Saddam kill anyone that got out of line. The entire middle east is a seething stew of religious fanaticism. No amount of money or good intentions will change that.
We owe Iraq, big time. We're morally obligated to pay for the great evils we have committed. Just abandoning the country is better than continuing our militaristic sins (forgive the term), but it's still irresponsible. I suggest our government formally and publicly apologize, allow any U.S. personnel accused of crimes to be tried by the Iraqi (not U.S.) justice system, and then allocate as many of our tax dollars as is necessary to Iraqi (not U.S.) firms to rebuild the country.
No, I'm not holding my breath. But it's what we should do.
Loyal to their Parties and not to their country....well I guess the Brits have managed to turn it into America. Seems our politicians work the same way....is there a difference when you really get right down to it? Why do all you regular people of the world think you need Laws, or rights or Constitutions?
we owe WE OWE, so it's off to work we GO