Increasingly, Israel is handing over its 'Judaisation' project to private firms - leading to a corrosion of accountability
For less than four dollars an hour, the Jewish teenagers removed furniture, clothes, kitchenware and toys from the homes and loaded them on to trucks. As they worked diligently alongside the many policemen who had come to secure the destruction of 30 houses in two unrecognised Bedouin villages, Bedouin teenagers stood by watching their homes being emptied.
When all the belongings had been removed, the bulldozers rapidly destroyed the homes. All those present, Jews and Bedouins, were Israeli citizens; together they learned an important lesson in the discrimination characterising civic life in the Jewish state.
The current demolitions are part of a strategy that began with the foundation of the state of Israel. Its ultimate objective is the Judaisation of space. In this case, the demolitions were carried out in order to establish two new Jewish villages. Their establishment, though, is part of a much larger plan that includes the construction of about 30 new Jewish settlements in the Israeli Negev, the seizure of Bedouin land for military needs, and the creation of dozens of single-family farms on land that has been inhabited by Bedouins since they were relocated to the region by the state in the early 1950s.
After witnessing the demolitions, a Bedouin activist asked one of the Jewish teenagers why he had agreed to participate in the eviction. Without hesitating, the teenager replied: "I am a Zionist and what we are doing here today is Zionism."
The teenager was not wrong. And yet he was probably too young to recognise that even though Zionism's major goals have not changed, the methods deployed to realise them have been undergoing a radical transformation. While, traditionally, the state itself performed the task of Judiasing space, over the years the government has been outsourcing more and more of its responsibilities to private firms. The teenager himself was hired by a personnel agency, which was employed by the state to carry out the job of expelling Bedouins from their homes.
The process of privatising Zionism has been slow. For over five decades the state was the sole agent responsible for all planning of new villages, towns and cities, and only the construction was carried out by private contractors. Now, land from which the Bedouins are being expelled is sold at rock bottom prices to big real estate moguls, who are then responsible not only for building Jewish villages and towns, but also for planning them. The private contractors manage to garner larger returns than ever before, since the difference in price between "unplanned" land and land that has undergone "planning" is enormous.
The personnel agencies and contractors are, however, not the only heroes in the crusade to privatise Zionism. A five-minute drive separates the two unrecognised Bedouin villages whose houses were demolished from a number of single-family Jewish farms established in the last few years. The state gives these Jewish farmers large plots of land and connects them to basic infrastructure like water and electricity, and, in return, expects them to be part of an apparatus whose role is to contract and restrict Bedouin movement and development and to help the security forces keep an eye on the Negev's indigenous population.
If one drives a few kilometres further and crosses the Green Line into the occupied Palestinian territories, one may notice that military checkpoints are also being privatised. In the past year, at least five such checkpoints have been handed over to subcontractors and are currently managed by corporate warriors. The difference between IDF soldiers and corporate warriors is that the latter operate within the gray areas of the law. They are Israel's Blackwater. Thus, as this privatising trend continues the checkpoints in the West Bank, which have already earned notoriety under the management of the Israeli military, will surely become sites of more misery for Palestinians trying to pass through.
The checkpoints, though, are just a recent development in a process that has been going on for several years in the occupied territories. In the early 1980s, the Israeli government allowed private contractors to appropriate land within the occupied territories and sell it at great profits, while the military created settler militias to help it police the Palestinian inhabitants. These civilian militias were given military-issue personnel carriers, weapons, and communications equipment and were asked to patrol around their settlements, which, in practice, often meant policing nearby Palestinian villages.
Zionism's privatisation does not symbolise a strategic change but rather a tactical one. The state has been shedding some of its responsibility, while private entities have been taking on the tasks that until recently had been carried out by the government. The major difference is that the private firms are even less liable than the state. Hence, the use of teenagers to evict Bedouins from their homes is not only a reflection of this insidious process of privatisation, but also the unrelenting corrosion of moral accountability.
Neve Gordon teaches politics at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel. He is the author of From the Margins of Globalization. His book Israel's Occupation will appear in 2008 (University of California Press). Erez Tzfadia teaches public policy at Sapir College in Israel.
© 2007 The Guardian
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
30 Comments so far
Show Allqbaldsmoove:
"But we shouldn't even ask these questions, if we do we are…, well, I'll let Jim Glover or Doc J call me that."
A late catch. I'll be sure to call you 'ellipsis'.
The terrible things I previously called ellipsis can be seen here:
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/12/12/5792/
Massud, moonraven has it right. According to your philosophy, the best defense is a good offense (often true in chess :)). Still, in human interaction there is something called "levels," meaning no problem can be solved at the level that creates it. Violence begets violence, retribution begets counter-retribution (is that the elephant in the room that almost everyone fails to see?) Psychic laws of the universe are at play here. Israel is no more "entitled" to its "Holocaust" than the Germans were. Both are equally as "evil," regardless of the justification given. Israel vigorously slanders and attacks those who question its actions in an attempt to deflect criticism. In spite of that many, if not most, see its actions for what they are. Given the Jewish history, there is an extreme irony here and a missed opportunity. The Jews by deed and word had the opportunity to speak out against genocide everywhere; instead, they saw/see fit to conduct their own. Israel has become the champion of nothing but its own self-interest, which seems true of human nature in general. Pity.
massud: How can one be "very racial"?
The zionists have no rights whatsoever. The Brits simply gave in to the zionist terrorists in order to focus on fighting Rommel in the deserts of Libya and Egypt.
From my perspective, it was a bad decision. Perhaps by stopping the german war machine sooner a few folks destined for the gas bath and the ovens were saved. But over the course of more than 60 years since that decision was made, far more Palestinians have been slaughtered or driven out of their homes--or both--than Jews were saved by the Brits fighting Rommel.
It is of course hindsight to say this.
The circularity of the zionists becoming the victimizers in their own holocaust dance is simply not justifiable.
The writing is on the wall for them--just as it was for the Babylonians (accordiung to the prophet Daniel, anyway) when the ancestors of the zionists were in captivity.
In the words of Kurt Vonnegut (RIP): and so it goes.
Well let's see moonraven, I oppose authoritarian government, I oppose racialism and race identity politics, I don't see how that would fit well with Klaus Barbie, who believed in authoritarian government and was actually quite racial.
The peace initiative is to stop the fighting. Not to help one side beat the other. Naturally there is 'peace' when one side of a conflict is annihilated. But I support real peace between the two nations, not victory of one side over and against the other. My focus is on humanity. Your focus(and the focus of the islamofascists) is on power and who has it. Neither Israeli or Pali should have power over the other, as in my view they both have a right to a nation and self-determination.
massud:
I do not have to flesh out any argument whatsoever.
The zionists have just adopted the holocaust with themselves as the victimizer this time. That makes perfect LOGICAL sense. It's just wrong.
Klaus Barbie would fit in just fine--just as he did with the fascists in Bolivia.
moonraven, actually flesh out an arguement that makes sense. And why would my hero be Klaus Barbie, an anti-semitic killer? Oh I see, not lying down and letting the Arabs win is racist. LOL
Israel exists, this is the reality. Destroying, dismantling or delegitimizing Israel is an aggressive act because it changes the status quo. If Pali's want peace, that's one thing. If they want to conquer Israel, that is something else entirely.
massud:
I bet you believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, too.
Or maybe your hero was Klaus Barbie?
Self defense, my ass.
Ya know, as long as there is talk of destroyed, dismantling and delegitimizing Israel I cannot believe Israel is acting in anything other than self defense.
1. De-countrify Israel.
2. Put the Zionists (privatised or otherwise) in whatever spots in the EU where folks feel guilty enough to take them.
3. From night to morning there will be a new old country: Palestine.
Works for me.
ZIONIST = RACIST
I must first admit to a large bias on this subject area.
Israel is the major force of conflict and distrust in the middle east. This has been the case since... certainly the "Six Days War of '67", and perhaps earlier.
Now, on this matter in particular.
The government of Israel is taking a page from the 'play book' of the current leadership here in the US of A. I believe. This allows for distancing themselves from the actions while benefiting from the results.
Now think about this approach folks... doesn't it ring of a popular philosophy here in the states? Think of "not in my back yard". As an example: we all want affordable clothes, but the labor to make them comes from the Far East because we can't allow such exploitation of workers here certainly!
We need to get real about the whole and see that the parts are connected.
Just more of the same old bullshit. Steal the land. Steal anything of value. Kill the nigger.
"Without hesitating, the teenager replied: "I am a Zionist and what we are doing here today is Zionism."
This kid would be a shoe-in for the part of Rolf Gruber in The Sound of Music. (Liesel's boyfriend, the bicycle messenger turned Nazi youth who rats on the Von Trapp family as they are escaping the convent.)
But seriously, edelweis' aside, these destructions are no less heinous than Krystal Nacht, or the ethnic cleansings in Serbia, or .....
Such a sad commentary on humanity that the only less on learned from the Nazi persecution of the Jews is the perfection of techniques...
I think it is best too look at Jews/Christians/Muslims as really the same and only judge the individual (as with all other people!). ZionISM is just based upon the biblical myths scribes set to paper many years ago. Myths that did much better as oral histories/stories. Once set to written text they become lessened. Only to produce conflict.
It would do well for folks here not to segregate a group and judge all individuals by the lowest common denominator.
Peace,
Radon
Never forget - Hillary Clinton's record as a Zionist sympathizer is long and clear. As senator from NY she pandered and pandered and pandered to the US Zionist institutions. A Zionist's dream - Hillary as the most powerful person on the planet!Do real Americans really want that?
'After witnessing the demolitions, a Bedouin activist asked one of the Jewish teenagers why he had agreed to participate in the eviction. Without hesitating, the teenager replied: "I am a Zionist and what we are doing here today is Zionism."'
whoops! How did that one slip by the zionist gatekeepers!
Zionism is clearly a racist ideology.
It should also be noted that the vast, vast majority of those who claim to be "Zionists" have no real ties to the original Hebrew ethnic group who lived in what is now Israel/Palestine 2000 years ago (due to, over time, numerous inter-marriages, new conversions, etc).
What is happening in Palestine currently is the same thing that happened to the Native Americans in the US (i.e. GENOCIDE). Zionists will often try to claim "well what about that?!" But we were not alive to stop the GENOCIDE against the Native American peoples, but we are alive now while the Zionists commit GENOCIDE in Palestine. And this is something we should to be trying to stop.
One day, arabs will get an a-bomb and theywill nuke Tel Aviv or some other Istaeli target. I will go outside and cheer.
Slow motion genocide. Our money made it possible. Our TAX $$$. Slow motion genocide. Well, I guess we got away with our genocide. I suppose they will get away with the one we funded.
Pieces.
If the Jewish religion survives, it will be in spite of Zionism and not because of it. These authors seem to recognize that.
One does not have to buy into any label applied to one. Labels tend to pigeon hole anyway. If you accept the label, then you limit yourself. If a group of people use the Holocaust as a shield against criticism, or as justification for the injury and oppression of others, then they are really supporting and perpetuating future holocausts (if not against themselves, then against others).
Exploitation by any other name still smells as rotten. Racism takes on many forms, some subtle, some not so subtle. And really in a sense, no matter how it is characterized or framed, it still amounts to a kind of Darwinism, does it not? If so, as a race, just what are we evolving toward?
So who hired the teenagers to clear out the homes bofore the cats took them down? Was it a private personnel firm doing the contracting? Could it have been Schwarzwasser? (Blackwater) [Sorry, my German spelling isn't very good.]
Well, here we go again. If we look logically at what has transpired we see things that we are not supposed to question. If we do we get called bad names. Names that are intended to marginalize our view; no, demonize our view.
What precedent was there for returning land to people that left it somewhere between 1500 and 2500 years earlier? Now ask what kind of precedent it sets? What about when the Native American Indians ask for their land back and point to this precedent?
And is Judaism a religion or nationality? I grew up believing the former. But yesterday a Jewish coworker informed me emphatically that it is not just the later, but it is BOTH! Wow, let me get this straight… If you are born in the US you can be Jewish. If you are born in Israel you ARE Jewish? What if you then move to the US, denounce Judaism and become Catholic. You are then a Catholic Jew? HMMMM. This is all part of the slow, inexorable grind that AIPAC is working on so quietly that most Americans have never even heard of it.
But we gentiles can't even ask these questions, they point to real problems that nobody, well certainly not any good Zionist, and that means the vast majority of Jews, want to acknowledge. Anybody that asks them must be demonized. Certainly if a Jew asks them they will be from within. There are some strong ones that are asking as we see here by Mr Gordon.
But once we ask them we see problems. Israel is carved out of some of the most religiously contentious lands on the planet. And we all know how rational religious fundamentalists are about what is theirs. And then, after plunking themselves down there does anybody try to get along?
But we shouldn't even ask these questions, if we do we are…, well, I'll let Jim Glover or Doc J call me that. Since they are so liberal I'm sure they'll do the right thing here and try to be progressive…
Ultimately I realize Israel is there, that's not changing. Is it too much to ask that they act like grownups? They have been given quite enough already.
Not only are zionists racist they are also communists F*CK zionism and F*CK Israel
Funny how people who feel good about their activist agendas prefer to do their own deeds, while people who know they should be ashamed of their agendas tend to hire others to handle their dirty work.
..."the state gives the farmers large plots of land".. while we, the US, continue to give tax dollars. Please, let's not go on with this ... it is wrong, it is not contributing to peace, understanding, good will, it will only, in the long run, be another nail in the proverbial coffin. How can it be expected that any person, deprived of what is theirs, will ever be content? Deprived people may or may not seek retribution, who is to know? This inhumane treatment of others can bring repercussions for generations to come.
Thank you, authors, for your article.
Zionism is racism.
and all Jews who identify with their Judiasm before their humanity, who continually exploit the Holocaust and historical victimization as cover, and whose allegiance to tribe renders them silent are RACISTS and guilty of crimes against humanity.
"Without hesitating, the teenager replied: "I am a Zionist and what we are doing here today is Zionism.""
none of this will dare stop tours to the "holy land" or the constant and rabid financial support of this crime. hopefully zionism one day will be considered one of the greatest crimes against humanity
Jewish teens should be breaking bread with Arab Bedouin teens not tossing them out homeless into the street. Sad how hate is passed on to the next generation in Israel.
your tax dollars at work, folks.
stop the u.s. occupation of the ME.