EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- 'We Are Movement, Not a Moment': North Carolina Peaceful Uprising Continues
- President Obama Uses a Sledgehammer Against Dissent
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- Is Enbridge Building a Secret Keystone Pipeline?
- President Obama Uses a Sledgehammer Against Dissent
- Victory: Connecticut Becomes First State to Require GMO Labeling
Popular content
Today's Top News
Indigenous Peoples Shut Out of Climate Talks, Plans
UNITED NATIONS - Global initiatives to reduce carbon emissions are bound to fail if the interests of indigenous communities are not taken into account, leaders of the world's 370 million indigenous peoples are warning.
"The success of efforts to lower carbon emissions from deforestation hinges primarily on whether indigenous peoples will throw their support behind proposed mechanisms," said indigenous leader Victoria Tauli-Corpuz, chair of the UN Permanent Forum.
Tauli-Corpuz told the UN Summit on Climate Change in Bali, Indonesia, this week that indigenous communities are increasingly worried about plans by governments and international financial institutions to control forest degradation.
The indigenous communities, according to her, are particularly concerned about the World Bank's Carbon Partnership Facility, which is likely to provide large-scale incentives for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation.
The tropical and subtropical forest, the subject of the Facility, is home to 160 million indigenous peoples who are seen by many scientists as custodians and managers of forest biodiversity.
"While the Facility can be a good thing, we are very apprehensive on how this will work," Tauli-Corpuz continued, "because of our negative historical and present experiences with similar initiatives."
The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples recognizes native groups' right to control their lands and resources, including forests, but many governments and corporations continue to abuse the rights of forest communities.
"We remain in a very vulnerable situation," said Tauli Corpuz, "because most states do not recognize our rights to these forests and resources found therein."
Last week, a report released by an international advocacy group raised similar concerns about the role of governments and corporations.
In its report, London-based Survival International named and shamed countries where the violations of tribal peoples' rights are most egregious, including Botswana, Brazil, New Zealand, Malaysia, Paraguay, Peru, and the United States.
The report entitled, "The Terrible Ten: Key Abusers of Tribal Peoples' Rights in 2007" says tribal people in West Papua are facing appalling violence at the hands of Indonesia's army, including killing, torture and rape. The natives' lands are often exploited by the government and foreign companies.
In Botswana, the government continues to prevent Bushmen from returning to their home in the country's diamond-producing area, despite a landmark court ruling that declared their 2002 eviction 'unlawful and unconstitutional.'
According to Survival, cattle ranchers occupying Guarani Indian land in Paraguay are committing armed violence against the natives. This year they killed two Guarani leaders and raped two Guarani women. Fear of rape has led many women to commit suicide.
In Peru, which is home to an estimated 15 of the world's last uncontacted tribes, the government has opened up the indigenous peoples' territories to oil companies and illegal loggers. Paraguay's Ayoreo-Totobiegosode people face a similar situation.
In Malaysia, land has been taken from the Sarawak tribe to make way for logging, dam construction, and oil palm plantations. The government has told the nomadic, hunter-gatherer Penan people that they have no land rights until they 'settle down' and start farming.
Meanwhile at the UN Summit in Bali, many indigenous groups protested against their exclusion from the climate change negotiations. They wore symbolic gags that read UNFCCC, the acronym of the United UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Last week, an indigenous delegation charged that despite having received an invitation, it was forcibly barred from entering the meeting between the UNFCCC executive secretary and civil society representatives.
"There is no seat or name plate for indigenous peoples in the plenary," stated Hubertus Samangun, the representative for English-speaking Indigenous Peoples of the Global Forest Coalition.
"Indigenous peoples are not only marginalized from the discussion, but there is virtually no mention of indigenous peoples in the more that 5 million words of UNFCCC documents," argued Alfred Ilenre of the Edo People of Nigeria.
"This is occurring despite the fact that indigenous peoples are suffering the most from climate change and climate change mitigation projects that directly impact their lands," IIenre added in a statement.
UN Permanent Forum's Tauli-Corpuz demanded the governments and corporations must obtain the "free and prior" consent of indigenous peoples before taking any initiative on forest protections.
"I imagine that donors and the private sector would not like to put their resources in high-risk projects which will not genuinely involve indigenous and other forest-dwellers," she said. "If there is an acceptance of the Facility, indigenous peoples must have a representation in [its] governance."
© 2007 One World.net
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

14 Comments so far
Show AllHolla back all my quechua peeps!
Imayna Qachqanki?!
Ironically the last few indigenous tribes who are living in more traditional and balanced way with the Earth, hold many of the keys and insights to get us out of the current mess we're in now.
The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples was opposed by the US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Because these countries are founded on the blood and the land of Indigenous Peoples. As long as the UN behaves as the United Nations of America, with Ban Kim-Moon behaving as the SPOKESPERSON OF THE WHITE HOUSE, the UN will continue to fail to acknowledge, leave alone protect, the rights of the indigenous peoples and the UN will become an instrument in the hands of the US and other colonial powers to strangulate the voices of the indigenous peoples.
KEM, MOON RAVEN &_ A L L _ —- I've seen your comments : " the edit function is STILL NOT WORKING!!!!!!"
My observations about EDITing, will allow you to get more effective results
(1). The 2nd (or 3rd) time into an edit, the actual text will not be properly shown after a re-fresh
(2). The refresh of the actual corrections that have been made, that weren't really lost, may take a half hr or so to show.
(3). The web page refresh is even more quirky with the JAVA count-down timer, and automatic addition to the URL of the thread's new addition (see navigation bar). Each article is of the form:
_ commondreams.org/archive/yyyy/mm/dd/nnnn/,
while the individual posts after the fact can be recalled directly by referencing the URL:
_ commondreams.org/archive/yyyy/mm/dd/nnnn/?jal_edit_comments#comment-xxxxxx
(4). THe text strings are defined as follows:
yyyy/mm/dd = year month day of month
nnnn = unique thread ID for each story, found in navigation URL
xxxxxx = unique post ID (within the thread ID) for each story, found by revealing page SOURCE, and searching for a text pattern in the beginning of your posting which will be several lines below your screen name, where xxxxxx number is 2 line above and a little bit to the right of your screen name)
I will tell more later, and have already discussed HTML text formating here
Namaste … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … Mahatma Gandhi … … … … … … … … … …
« We must be the change we wish to see in the world »
« There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need but not for man's greed »
"The tropical and subtropical forest, the subject of the Facility, is home to 160 million indigenous peoples who are seen by many scientists as custodians and managers of forest biodiversity."
Custodians and managers? Hubris! This is the same rhetoric employed by the Catholic Church during the Age of Discovery. American Indians were just temporary caretakers of the land, mere savages no better than the animals of the forest. Double hubris !! This politcal attitude allowed the termination of one hundred million Indigenous Peoples on the American continent, with the blessing of Christian Churches of Europe. This is the language of Genocide.
As usual, the folks most affected are not part of the decision-making process.
Planetary totalitarianism in action.
Irish:
Bunk! YOUR bigotry is showing.
Over 500 years of resistance a massive genocide was committed against MY people. A total of just over 90 MILLION of them, in fact.
And get off your gringo-centric bandwagon, as I am talking about AMERICA: this HEMISPHERE.
an earlier post did not go up.
http://www.survival-international.org/campaigns/progresscankill/starvation
The link above is for a letter writing campaign for the Kaiowá Guarani in Mato Grosso in Brazil. The article does not tell the full story, it is genocide according to the UN. Please write a letter and pass it on to as many people as possible. These ancient forest stewards need to live!
http://www.cimi.org.br/?system=news&eid=340 - english page with news re: indigenous peoples in Brazil
When I look at the BS that Irish Eddie O'Hara offers. I kinda throw up a little bit in my mouth. It's precisely this type of arrogance that has brought Mother Earth to the sorry state that we now find her.
I was raised in a Christian home .3 of my first cousins are ministers.Fact is I nearly took that path myself at one point.(of course I was into Santa and the Easter Bunny at one point too.)
But one day I grew up and quit believing in fables.It was only then that I could truly understand how much a part of it all I really am.
It truly baffles my mind now how after (how many?) centuries of this theology the masses still attempt to some how defend it over the very biosphere that gives each and every living microbe ,plant and creature on this planet LIFE.
I mean how are we to communicate if I've got to make all my thoughts align with (how many ?) different fantasies.
If they have cash then corporations will sell them floats to tread water when their homes are under water. Other than that or slaves indigenous people just get in the way of resource utilization.
old goat thanks for the links
I don't think this bulletin is worded correctly. It first talks about governments reducing carbon emissions from deforestation and controlling forest degradation- Hey, that sounds good to me to limit logging- but this is worded like it's a bad thing. Then the bulletin mentions Peru's government opening up their land to oil companies and loggers and Malaysian land being taken for logging, dam construction and palm oil plantations- This is a bad thing, of course. Then a U.N. spokesperson demands governments must get permission from the people living on the land before taking any initiative on forest protections- HUH? It should read- Governments and corporations must get permission from the people living on the land before doing any forest degradation like logging- and hopefully the people won't give them that permission. So, to summarize, this bulletin should be reworded that governments SHOULD reduce carbon emissions by stopping logging and other forest degradation (that is done without the people's permission) but they shouldn't need permission to make initiatives on forest protection and reducing carbon emissions.
No more clearing of what you didnt grow means just that.
minimum standards of emmissions means just that. Have we all been stupified by exemptions and back-pedealing rectoric? If people dont know what the emplications of ignoring our entire ecology they need only ask third world countries what they see comming into there future.
I have recently lost posts, too.