Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
It's Time to Clean the House
Nancy Pelosi should resign as Speaker of the House of Representatives. Since she won't, I hope the voters in her liberal California district throw her out next November.
Here are the facts as reported by The Washington Post (facts that Pelosi has not contested). In 2002, Nancy Pelosi was given a briefing that informed her that waterboarding - a form of torture applied, among others, by the Nazis - was being used, or at least about to be used, by the CIA. She raised not a peep.
The Post notes that waterboarding, an interrogation technique that uses simulated drowning, has officially been regarded as torture by the U.S. military since the Spanish-American War. The Post article further notes that while Pelosi "declined to comment directly ... a congressional source familiar with Pelosi's position on the matter ...acknowledged that Pelosi did not raise objections at the time."
That's enough for me. I don't want to hear the liberal equivocators, the ones saying, well, it was right after 9/11 when Americans were afraid -- the ones trying to draw distinctions between Pelosi's acquiescence and Dick Cheney's enthusiasm. When it comes to immoral actions, such distinctions just don't wash. Those who stand by and acquiesce in the end are nearly as guilty as those who carry out the torture.
It is a crime in this country to have knowledge of a murder without reporting it. Plain and simple. It should be a crime in this country to have knowledge of torture without reporting it - in this case to the people who hired the Congress, the voting public.
Of course, in this era of unending fear and increasing secrecy, no one will push that argument. In fact, when the subject of torture surfaces on occasion, the president, with an assist from the press, usually puts it quickly to rest.
"Americans do not torture," W. says. And everyone goes back to sleep.
Sometimes the media barely wake up to begin with. The Washington Post story to me demonstrated an extraordinary degree of cynicism by the top-ranked Democrat, a leader who regularly complains about government secrecy in her role as opposition party leader. Yet this story has had little traction elsewhere in the traditional news media. Which leads me again to wonder: Who needs Nero's fiddle when we already dance daily around tales like Jennifer Love Hewitt's hint of flab, oblivious to the corrosion of our democratic principles at a time of a war against "terror," a war in other words without end?
Truth, it has been said, is the first casualty of any war. The truth is too ugly to witness and so we hide it behind euphemism and platitude, inventing words such as "collateral damage" in place of accidental civilian deaths. We hide the truth by hiding the pictures of the dead, the maimed and the forgotten from the public. We hide the truth by giving glorious and high-minded reasons for killing in the first place.
Remember "Operation Iraqi Freedom?" Try talking of freedom to the millions of Iraqis who have fled their homes. Promote it to the relatives of the tens of thousands of civilians who have died, too. Then there are the U.S. statistics: nearly 4,000 soldiers and Marines dead, seven times more wounded and maimed, and, according to a special CBS report, a sharply escalating suicide rates among veterans. (That story, too, disappeared in the blink of an eye though based on a five-month investigation.)
These are all numbers we can count. What's harder to measure after five plus years of war is the deep-seeded cynicism of our leaders and the ennui - the boredom -- that is rotting our culture from within.
We have - or at least we used to have - a Constitution governing the United States. We follow - or we used to follow - the Geneva Conventions, which set standards for treatment of prisoners of war. We have - or we used to have - the rule of law.
But we will continue to only if we insist that someone enforces those laws - that we live in a government of debate, not silent deceit, that politicians of both parties serve guiding principles greater than those of accumulating power and getting re-elected. . Whatever their political stripe, liberal or conservative, Republican or Democrat, Libertarian or Green, truly patriotic Americans need to stand up, to speak out, to stick by the principles under which this country was founded, and to throw the bums leading both parties out. Then, at last, our drift toward a totalitarian state will stop.
Justice and the primacy of just law will be the basis of our democracy only for as long as we, the people, demand that they be. They are not immutable, not rights that can be sustained forever if we choose to pull the covers over our heads and quake while bullies or tag-alongs of all ideological stripe tear apart the bulwark of our system of government. They are rights that we must cling to tightly - and not leave for safekeeping to those, like Nancy Pelosi, who talk of their value and then chose selectively to disregard them.
Jerry Lanson teaches journalism at Emerson College in Boston. He can be reached at jerry_lanson@emerson.edu.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


13 Comments so far
Show AllQuestions in order of decreasing concern for many Americans:
1. Which of a host of has-been stars can best learn to dance?
2. Is Jennifer what's-her-name overweight?
3. Do you love Jesus and hate Gays and support our troops?
4. "Deal or No Deal"?
5. Where in the world is Iraq/Iran?
6. Does America Torture?
It's time to clean the house--tright, got it! Next queastion "with what?" or more apropriately "with whom?".Let's suppose Cindy beats Nancy--(how sweet that would be!). Who's gonna beat Steny, the blue dogs, Hillary, Barracko, Biden, Richardson, and the whole rest of the corporate owned, internationalist-meddling pack of jackals who make up the Democratic majorities. And let's not even think about the unappologetic, brown-shirted, swastika wearing, Bush imitators in the Republican party.
Let's change corporate "personhood" and "rights" first, then go after the elitist oligarchy, because if we don't more corporate clones will be pulled out of the Democratic Party hat to replace the omnes we defeat. Like the Borg on Star Trek they will adapt to our movement and go on assimilating the commons, the people, and the earth to their own and our destruction.
After that we must maintain net neutrality, replace the current crazies on the FCC, and get a new justice or two on the Supreme Court.
Jennifer Love Hewitt is getting flabby? Say it ain't so!
...sorry, I snapped...couldn't help it.
Try this: switch your voter reg. to Independent ASAP. Watch the Dems panic as their "base" goes rogue. Then, if you donated to any loyalbushieDems, call them and demand a refund, then remind them if they want your money, they're gonna have to earn it for the first time in their lives.
Let's Clean the house with people who have spines, is aware of the constitution and is willing to stand up.
Know someone like that?
Ask him or her to run.
Let us assert our independence by electind independents.
And Kucinich.
One possibly dumb question: I thought that the Congresspeople who get briefed on this stuff are sworn to secrecy, with the threat that if they say one word to anyone, even their own staff members, they will be subject to criminal prosecution for leaking classified information. That's why one of them (I can't remember which one) hand-wrote an objection, because he feared that having his secretary type it would be illegal.
I find all this secrecy outrageous, but even more outrageous is the threat that if legislators do their jobs, they're risking criminal prosecution.
Anyone know whether this is the case?
Betsy - yes that is the case - and that one was Sen. Rockefeller, from W.Virginia. [that family gets around]
OK, but even assuming it's correct that Congresspersons attending the briefings in question were sworn to absolute secrecy, which indeed places them in a bind, that doesn't let them off the hook. "Absolute secrecy" doesn't exist in a vacuum.
Suppose the meetings pitched assassination instead of torture? Presumably the Congresspersons would be forced to nod solemly, bound as witnesses, giving tacit approval and/or denied power to influence the schemes. Seems to me like another instance in which the Executive Branch is simply asserting absolute and unchecked power, and the Legislative Branch sits silently as monks in vespers.
If at this point the Congress, especially the unjustly enhanced Democratic Party, is unable or unwilling to treat the Executive Branch as the rogue and renegade gang of outlaws it has openly become, they're nothing but enablers and accessories to the relentless dismantling of constitutional and civil rights, and waging open-ended imperialist wars of aggression.
If a reasonable, moral person attends a secret and confidential hearing in which the person learns of plans and practices that violate international law and human rights-- criminal activities-- that person doesn't have the option of acquiescing to such news. It seems to me that the secrecy restriction cuts both ways; if someone who is appropriately outraged publicly protests and generally opposes these clandestine crimes and atrocities, without revealing any of the specifics from the briefings, how are the authorities going to shut the person down? If the government busts the rebel for allegedly leaking classified secrets about torture just because the person publicly proclaims opposition to the practice, it will send the signal that they really DO have something to hide.
In a fascist, authoritarian state, such opponents of misfeasance could be imprisoned, disappeared, liquidated. But surely politicians in the Land of Freedom Fries expect no such draconian reprisals.
I think it much likelier that the Dem leadership is complicit rather than feckless. In any case, they're happy for any excuse that bolsters their perennial plaint that they're more to be pitied than censured.
Pelosi is a Petain, a Pontius Pilate, a Quisling. In a just world she would be tossed out of office, if not into a cell. It is certainly misprison, at the least. She has forfeit what little respect anyone was once deluded enough to accord her. It's time for her to go.
Am I the only one who has noticed that Cindy Sheehan was once the darling of progressive talk radio, always on "Big Eddie's" show, and other places - until she declared she was running against Speaker Pelosi. I haven't heard Cindy on anything since, only in places like CD. Just how progressive and independent is "progressive talk" radio anyway? I've heard Randi Rhodes and Thom Hartmann both cut off callers who started to question the influence of AIPAC and the Zionist lobby. Is there really any truly open, independent media out there? Can't talk about Kucinich and single-payer health insurance on Daily Kos? I thought one of the tenants of being liberal was being open to discuss just about anything, except say, kiddie porn.
I stand with those who want to clean the House of it's current Democratic "leadership", starting with electing Cindy Sheehan to replace the despicable Pelosi.
Here's some of the latest from Harper's:
What Difference Would It Make?
Here's the 1st paragraph: "The Department of Justice and the CIA are undertaking a "preliminary investigation" to determine whether a more formal probe of the destruction of the two tapes is appropriate. The effort on the Justice side is entrusted to Kenneth L. Wainstein, the assistant attorney general responsible for counterterrorism efforts, who is coordinating with the CIA's Inspector General, John L. Helgerson, on the probe."
Namaste … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … Mahatma Gandhi … … … … … … … … … …
« We must be the change we wish to see in the world »
« There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need but not for man's greed »
"who is coordinating with the CIA's Inspector General, John L. Helgerson, on the probe." (nspire)
* That's a good thing.
"John Helgerson, the CIA Inspector General, concluded in a report in 2004 that some C.I.A.-approved interrogation procedures "...appeared to constitute cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, as defined by the international Convention Against Torture." At least one senior CIA official resigned in protest of the procedures, but DCI Michael Hayden's response has been to proceed with the torture, while launching an investigation in an apparent effort to intimidate Helgerson into submission."
http://www.bitsofnews.com/content/view/6455/
I agree with Lanson's conclusion:
"Nancy Pelosi should resign as Speaker of the House of Representatives. Since she won't, I hope the voters in her liberal California district throw her out next November."
I am glad that others commenting here know that Pelosi already has a very real challenger, and that her name is "Cindy Sheehan".
I suppose mentioning the name of an independent candidate, even one of Sheehan's stature, would be a lot to ask and would take this essay off into an awkward tangent... but I am rather tiring of those who forever profess the need for productive change, but fail promote or even take notice of those who are actually implementing it.
"In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies but the silence of our friends." -- Martin Luther King, Jr.