Cut the Corporate Welfare Umbilical Cord
Rumors that Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke, would again reduce interest rates by at least 25 basis points elevated Asian and European stock markets and rattled the New York Mercantile Exchange oil speculators.Normally, such an action by the Fed- the all purpose government guarantor of "Wall Street's" reckless risk taking - would be viewed as stimulating the overall economy. But what is on the financial tycoon's minds these days is the rapid metastasis of the sub-prime home mortgage crisis.
Beyond its shielding effect on large U.S. banks and their collapsing stock values, this crisis has depleted banks and mortgage lenders in Europe and Asia, and invited an assortment of credit and liquidity bailouts by central banks, and left the large investors caught in this spider's web.
So, the spotlight is on Chairman Bernanke for another temporary rescue of the reckless risk takers in the financial economy he so dutifully services.
But a closer look is warranted on the role of Chairman Bernanke and his predecessor, Alan Greenspan. How did this sub-prime mortgage situation cast such a long and devastating net from the hundreds of thousands of people who are and will lose their homes to the fat cat financiers finally caught in the act of inebriated risk management?
First, the Fed almost never criticizes the banks. It just rescues them again and again in a variety of ways often obscure to the general public or camouflaged as these banks are considered too big to be allowed to fail. The bankers, knowing that the Fed fire department is always around the corner, push the risk envelope to the edge.
It was left to the conservative German Finance Minister Peer Steinbrück this week to condemn the "snotty attitude that we have sometimes seen under the motto of 'we are cleverer than the others' - [that] ended in disaster."
Minister Steinbrück made it clear that the "disaster" meant the global credit squeeze, and several mismanaged German banks which he specifically named - Sachsen LB and IKB.
Imagine Greenspan and Bernanke even climbing down their reassuring abstraction ladder in time to head off such financial turmoil for many small investors, pension funds and workers who pay the price.
Imagine the Federal Reserve Bank, whose budget came from the financial community in order to avoid accountability to Congress, enforcing the law against a lending spree, fueled by repeated deception and cover ups?
The airy Fed does neither. It sees its job as injecting tens of billions of dollars to avoid liquidity and a credit crunch crisis. Corporate socialism is its beat, and its signal to Wall Street is that these rescues for the Street's addictions will be on tap at all times
Grumbling all the way, Europe's central bankers have been engaged in their own domestic rescue operations flowing from the U.S. sub-prime mortgage crisis.
Why, ordinary taxpayers and consumers may ask, do mortgages extended to homeowners on Elm Street, USA, circle the globe with so much disruption? Because unlike the old days when the local mutual savings and loan association was doing such a quiet, prudent job raising America's home ownership rate to record highs, the S & L's are gone and the security speculators have taken over.
Large bundles of home mortgages are bundled into securities which are then transformed into even more abstract and complex risk packages. The greater the risk that these packaged securities entail, the greater the profits.
Until, that is, the deck of cards start falling to real ground, which is what began to happen this year, and next year will be worse in both these key sectors of the economy, with its overall effect on the general economy.
In the meantime, the muscle of the financial industry's lobby is making sure no regulatory framework passes Congress or even is given no-holds-barred public hearings in the Senate and the House.
The sheer arrogance of this financial business suckled by government dispensed welfare is not restricted to the U.S.
German Finance Minister Steinbrück, trying to calm fears, still acutely observed that the bankers and financiers had "mocked" his attempt at enhanced transparency, deliberately characterizing such efforts for great disclosure as "regulation" when Steinbrück's initiative called only for voluntary codes.
Let's drop the enduring myth that these big time, very well-paid speculators are free-wheeling capitalists broadening markets for low-income people. They are wasters of capital (largely using other people's money as with worker pension funds.) not their own stakes.
Such even wilder speculation, generated through even more complex speculative instruments in a super-sonic computer age, will continue until people, who pay the final bills, organize as voters and consumers to make their supreme government cut the corporate welfare umbilical cord that extends from Washington, DC to Wall Street.
Ralph Nader is a consumer advocate, lawyer, and author. His most recent book is The Seventeen Traditions.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
27 Comments so far
Show AllTo say Al Gore would have been as bad as Bush (above) is so vastly ignorant and mindlessly stupid as to defy definition.
Bye,I volunteer at a homeless shelter and I gotta go.
Merry Christmas!
When the Democrats are in control of the House, the Senate and the White House they should pass a law that makes all third parties illegal. That would solve all of our problems. In fact, why allow even 2 parties?
Ralph was condemning the predatory loan business before Bush!
Large bundles of home mortgages are bundled into securities which are then transformed into even more abstract and complex risk packages.
Home Mortgages, are nothing but IOUs! NOT REAL MONEY
They are investing these IOUs as Real Money, and reaping the profit.
If it fails the Central Bank bails them out.
If the homeowner's rent goes up because of these jerks, and they can't make payments, this administration made sure they couldn't claim bankruptcy.
Why, because that individual can't contribute the money to political campaigns that powerful lobbies can.
Wow,
The mountains of ignorance are absolutely breathtaking in this country. Here's a guy: Ralph Nader fighting Goliath again and all some posters can do is criticize him for having the courage to fight this monster all by himself (since most cowardly Americans are glued to the boob tube ignoring the unmistakable drone of a corporate police state army advancing toward suburbia.)
Now it appears Ralph is also guilty of causing homelessness in the United States!
I submit that the growing homeless population is there because nobody would listen to Ralph's insights on civic structure forty years ago. I also submit that a Corporate Al Gore would have been just as bad a president as Bush since his corporate masters would have called the same tyrannical plays no matter which puppet (Repuke or Dem) won.
Vote for the best man.
Vote third party.
Don't vote Democrat again. Ever.
Accurate. So why did he help throw the scissors away?
Via the "voters" and thus let the "Republicans control government."
Not logically reconcilable. I am an old man and have heard him blow his horn for around forty years. But if he has done anything concrete to help the hungry or homeless, fed them or sheltered them, let me know. People worried about interest rates on credit cards usually know nothing about real hunger or pain. How nice to talk default rates and CD's paying zero to five percent....people who really need help don't have credit cards. Their CD's are scratched, not analyzed by bankers. These soliloquies are segueing into irrelivant cafe diatribe. Enjoy your double latte. Put it on your credit card.
Einstein, Right On!
Actually Ralph, this is not an accident, and it's not banking, nor government.
This is aggressive and violent theft, based on financial sapping of personal wealth and investments by collateralizing, incomes, property and lives, usury being the lure for the "low interest loan" baited trap.
The water for these unfortunate fish, is the counterfeit currency created by the federal government for select bankers and financial operatives. This is causing the US currency to lose credence and value among all people, and is driving up the cost of living exponentially.
The government is in effect printing money and granting it to cronies to finance bogus business.
The sucker loans are akin to the free tokens that casinos give out to get you started gambling.
The people who have created the crisis, knew it would happen, and that millions would lose their assets, after they lured people into them. In effect, they urged people to collaterlize themselves.
When these people go bust, the really big inside players in the government finance scam in the background will come back and
mop up these assets at bargain prices. They make money at the start through commissions on loans, and money at the other end in salvage operations.
That is the nature of this massive piece of government backed fraud. It is the trickery that Rousseau refers to when he says that the powerful gain influence originally by tricking people out of their inaliable human rights. In America there is an effort afoot to use the trickery of false commerce, especially in the stock market and central banking system to turn over all neccessary capital assets from one class of people to another very limited number of people.
At the same time the collateralization of all life's neccessities, including water, air, education, medical attention, etc., is driving up prices and creating artificial shortages and monopolies, which are not financial in nature, but totalitarian.
This will all fall apart. It's falling apart now. It is a worldwide effort to gain control of capital assets and to back up that control with mercenaries, including police thugs to brutalize, intimidate, incarcerate, and torture. You are either with these thugs, or you are with the "terrorists." That is the motto that is used as a banner of intimidation by the ax murders who intend to genocide huge portions of humanity on a continual basis, as has been done in places like New Orleans, for example.
But, for reform really to take place, masses of people will have to go after the new nobility, ruthlessly as during the
French revolution.
What the Fed (not only the "Fed" Reserve Bank, but also the whole "Fed" government)ought to be doing, if we had a populist Fed, is RAISE the interest rates paid by banks to depositors so as to encourage savings while simultaneously capping the interest rates which can be charged on credit cards. There is something wrong with FDIC-insured accounts and CDs paying zero to 5%, while corporations push people to so-called "default" rates of near 32%. We, the people are being schnitzled on these rate cuts supposedly aimed at reducing borrowers' costs. Grandma's savings account pays for much of it while consumer lending rates stay the same or go higher. This shall remain the case as long as Republicans control government.
Ralph Nader used the word "voters" in his closing paragraph and that's where the scissors are kept for cord-cutting.
divisive hogwash
Is a spoiler one who points to the elelphant in the living room, who notes the King has no clothes? I'll try to be sorry later.
Now to a more intelligent input/response:
I am stating that Nader "caused" the Republican win, and that this was clearly forseeable as the only realpolitik consequence of his run. So that is "on" him. The drivel about anyone can run in a free democracy, that it was for principle, pales in the light of what Nader's run did. Tell a hundred thousand dead Iraqi civilians about principle, tell the tortured of Abu Grhaib, tell the victims of Katrina. The
CORPORATE UMBILIICAL CORD? As in deregulation, no oversight, bailouts by the fed? Hey Ralph-you put the worst players on the board you hypocrite. Imagine no Cheney, No Bush, No Plame affair, No lies to war...then just imagine Nader did not run and you have it!
His intent? Feeding his foul old ego I think. To knowingly install the despot?.....well, if it looks like a lie, feels like a lie, and walks like a lie.....who knows.
Did he not know or did he not care that he would put the monster in office? It has to be one or the other. Pick one Nanoooooo (?) and explain it away if you can. yeah bright strong light spoils rotten meat. try not get personal, call names, Nanooooo...
I was wondering how long it would take before a spoiler, like you mikepeters would inter the conversation.
mikepeters December 4th, 2007 1:25 am
Are you saying Nader intended a Republican win?
Hyprocrisy. Nader's EGO driven decision to run for president absolutely and most critically TOTALLY PREDICTABLY factored into the installation of the current Republican regime. A regime at the trough with the corporate war-pig swine, banks and federal reserve he is whining about. But Gee, Ralph helped put them together! What a hypocrite to now write a cerebral article (for his EGO, his tired old EGO) lamenting a malaise he helped create.
These last years and their fruit, their bloody fruit have been Gifts, Gifts from Nader too.
"Fascism is capitalism in decay"
Vladimir Lenin
"Fascism is capitalism plus murder."
Upton Sinclair
"Fascism is a religious concept"
Benito Mussolini
"This is a deeply uncanny and very troubling development, it exists, and it wants to take us back. It wants to take us, I mean, way back. I mean sure, they want to go back before the 70's and the 60's to the 50's, no doubt about that. They also want to go back before the New Deal to the 20's, well they also want to go back before the Progressive Era to the Gilded Age. Well, not quite, they also want to go back before the Emancipation Proclamation to the days of slavery, not even, what they want to do is take us back to a moment prior to the Enlightenment; they want to take us back to a moment when faith registered more than reason. They want to take us back to an imaginary age of absolute moral clarity, when good was good and evil was evil and everyone could see the difference. They want to take us back to an imaginary Manichean age when you're either with us or against us, which means you either are us or we'll exterminate you because we can only tolerate ourselves, we can only tolerate those who share our values. If this movement were to be given a name, I think it would most appropriate to call it Christo-Fascism, and if anyone objects to my using the word fascism, because it seems so redolent of the Axis powers, and after all we valiantly defeated fascism once, well understand this about fascism, when it arrives it never shows up in the discarded costume of some other country, and when fascism comes here, its not going to be wearing a toothbrush mustache with a luger in his belt and go goose-stepping around the mall, because that's Germany. And its precisely characteristic of fascism, that it seems absolutely, totally expressive of the homeland, it seems completely familiar, it's when 150% America puts a flag on it's lapel and a cross around it's neck and a real folksy way a talkin', but just because it's red, white and blue, doesn't mean it's American."
A Patriot Act
Mark Crispin Miller
EXPATINCE B U -- follow this link for a 10 min video here, and here for a 3 hr expansion on today's "old" FASCISM links, to see how bad that it really is.
May the angles of LIGHT bless our souls, and guide us from
this twisted web of DARKNESS and horrendous suffering.
Namaste … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … Mahatma Gandhi … … … … … … … … … …
« We must be the change we wish to see in the world »
« There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need but not for man's greed »
The following resulted from a GAO study which Senator Bernie Sanders (Independent) requested:
"Thirty-one percent of all banks paid no corporate income taxes at all by becoming Subchapter S corporations. In 2006, banks and thrifts received $146 billion in profits compared to a mere $6 billion in retained earnings for the entire credit union industry. Compared to the previous ten years, banks and thrifts experienced double the earnings growth rate of credit unions in 2006 after adjusting for inflation. Some banks, like BB&T, have evaded millions of dollars in U.S. taxes by setting-up illegal tax shelters."
You can read the 39 page PDF file at: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d07593r.pdf
###
Do you think tax payers should be bailing out corporations (Subchapter S Corporations) that don't pay any taxes in the U.S.?
Ahhhh, Corporate Welfare.....what a glorious invention!
Deregulation is the empty hand of EVIL,
whose other hand is in our pocket
Both must be cut off !
Namaste
@ Rebel Farmer
Interesting. I also have a feeling that something big is going to happen next March.
Nader is right. What we're seeing here is wholesale bailout of financial institutions that created this mess. Ben "helicopter" Bernake got his middle name when he stated that in times of economic downturns he'll just get airborne & throw money out of a helicopter (No, not over your house - This one is Wall Street exclusively).
Shows you the frame of mind of this guy. After decades of speculation and hubris that made this class of people super rich, they have lost any sense of reality. There was always a huge fee/bonus during the bubble and a bailout when it burst.
Not this time though.
There's simply not enough taxpayers money to plug this hole. They'll have to settle with the multi million dollar packages that they've collected so far.
I'm not even talking about the "sub-prime" crisis. This one just started the credit crunch avalanche that is going to spread everywhere. Please go and read this article:
http://www.fxstreet.com/futures/market-review/outside-the-box/2007-11-27.html
There is 45.5 Trillion (Yes - Trillion) in outstanding credit risk in the "markets". Most of it in "repackaged" junk-bonds. A bubble of unimaginable proportions. Nurtured with cheap credit and deregulation.
I can't even imagine what will happen when this one explodes. All I know is that the process has started already.
Yes, this needs to be called Corporate Socialism. As a socialist I am indignant whenever the term is used to denote something incredibly evil. But if it's going to imply evil when implemented at the personal level, the term should certainly be considered evil at the corporate level.
I am tired of conservatives talking about letting "market forces" guide the economy, and then insisting on tax breaks for corporations to get them to invest, lower capitol gains tax rates for the same reason, huge guaranteed loans to build nuclear plants, etc. Corporate socialism is exactly what it is; if it's evil for personal socialism, it's certainly evil at the corporate level.
I'd also like to know what ever happened to Bush's "ownership society?" Why aren't the liberals/progressives talking about that? Is it only the conservatives that are framing the discussion? When everyone was taking out these ARMs Bush touted it as the great ownership society. Now he's being awfully quite about that crap. Why is it that the only one that will point that out is going to be John Stewart?
Finally, I'd like to warn everybody about the stock market. Think savings and loan crises of the '80's and the last time the stock market crashed at the end of the '80's. Am I the only one that sees a connection? I'm no economist, but it's obvious to me that these huge bailouts of failed financial sectors have to be paid for. And of course, while these huge corrections are taking place your financial advisor will tell you "hold tight, the last thing we want is everybody bailing out now" while he secretly does. Do you think he's going to pay for the adjustment and do the noble thing? No, but he's counting on you doing it, otherwise he's really screwed. Hmm, if everybody bailed out, the early one's would be rewarded the most, and the one's that waited would be penalized the most. Then, after everyone was finally out, those that had gotten out earliest would be able to re-up again the most. Sounds almost Ponzi-esque, no?
We cannot cut the cord until we have bailed out all of the industries that are involved in breaking the union movement. We gave the airline industry 11 billion after 9/11 to break the union...the auto companies are crying that "nobody wants to buy our cars because the union workers are so shitty" so now the uaw is busted, and the idiots that run it bitch when they make less than 10 million a year, and dont forget Boeing and how they have destroyed the union on the west coast, (we are bailing them out with the fraud filled air tanker program, but there is no more fraud than in any other government project that they get) we have the so called right to work laws that protect the construction industry so they can hire all of the un-skilled un-documented workers that they want, all of the defense work has been moved to these so called right to work states.
We give the oil companies a 16 billion dollar per year tax break and I will bet they use no union workers...We give the liquor industry huge tax breaks and I will bet they use no union workers, the newspaper buisness has been allowed to break all of the unions....
What the fuck?
This is the key sentence in my opinion: "But what is on the financial tycoon's minds these days is the rapid metastasis of the sub-prime home mortgage crisis." The use of the word "metastasis" infers that the financial markets are in the end stages of a cancer that has festered for a long time. And is probably incurable without killing the patient.
To my mind, since the cancer can't be cured, financial markets as they are now constructed must die just as they did in the '30's. Unfortunately, the victims - the workers of the world - will be the ones that pay for this mess. And it's going to be VERY painful. And Since 1492 is right. The corporations have the scissors and they will be the ones to cut the cord themselves. Unfortuneatly, we the people will be the ones to bleed from the cut.
All I can do is ban together with other folks in my community and get ready together for what is going to be a very diffecult ride. It's not a matter of if, but when the shit is going to hit the fan. I'm guessing sometime in March.
Peace and Solidarity
I agree with Mr. Nader's article 100%.
These corporations make their economic and social costs public, but make their profits entirely private. Capitalism as is practiced in the United States is a tragic farce.
Capitalism and corporations are threats to democracy.
And why is the Federal Reserve Bank --- a private bank --- dictating economic policy in America, something our
Congress is elected to do.
Nader is correct and has long been correct, but like those many before us who have awakened to find their governments corrupted by decades of unaddressed political violence, we are now under their thumb.
There are solutions to our problems:
Nationalize our oil and take back control of our natural resources from the few private families who "own" them.
Put ELECTRIC CARS on our roads --
We can subsidize both the manufacture and the purchase
End computer voting -- See: VOTESCAM website
This vote stealing hasn't been going on since 2000,
it's been going on for more than 40 years. Journalists
Jim & Ken Collier investigated computer voting for
25 years beginning in the late 1960's. Their book on
their findings is available at the website to be scanned or read.
Publically financed campaigns --- with debates organized by the public -- where and when and how we say.
IRV voting --- with third parties.
Neither Republicans nor Democrats are going to accommodate us in passing these changes.
The banks and the FED are prostitute sisters of the same mother.
Overthrow the moneychangers' tables and let them work honestly for their food.
Nader is in no personal danger: he knows the difference between a $2.00 bill and a $5.00 bill.
Speaking the truth on matters like this is very dangerous Ralph. Be careful, or they might have you "disappeared" in short order. Fascism is here, my friend. Keep screaming the truth from the mountain top brother.
How can we cut the cord when only the corporations have scissors?
Hoa binh
"Corporate Socialism" has a name, it is Fascism. Time to call it what it is.
Mike