KABUL, Afghanistan - U.S.-led coalition troops killed 14 road construction workers in airstrikes in eastern Afghanistan after receiving faulty intelligence, Afghan officials said Wednesday.
The coalition said it was looking into the incident in Nuristan province, but did not immediately comment. NATO's International Security Assistance Force said it has conducted airstrikes against Taliban fighters in the area, but did not say when.
"ISAF was engaged in Nurgaram and Du Ab (districts), and in those places we used airstrikes against (Taliban)," ISAF spokesman Brig. Gen. Carlos Branco told a news conference. "The situation is not clear at all at this stage. We are carrying out the investigation and trying to get a clear picture."
The engineers and laborers had been building a road for the U.S. military in mountainous Nuristan province, and were sleeping in two tents in the remote area when they were killed Monday night, said Sayed Noorullah Jalili, director of the Kabul-based road construction company Amerifa. There were no survivors, he said.
"All of our poor workers have been killed," Jalili said. "I don't think the Americans were targeting our people. I'm sure it's the enemy of the Afghans who gave the Americans this wrong information."
Jalili earlier said 22 workers were killed, but he said the latest reports indicated the death toll was 14. He did not say why the preliminary figures were higher.
The report could not be independently verified because the area is remote and inaccessible.
The company has requested that the U.S. military investigate the source of its information, Jalili said.
Nuristan Gov. Tamim Nuristani said the coalition conducted airstrikes after receiving reports that "the enemy" was in the area, and hit the road construction workers as they were sleeping. Afghan officials often refer to the Taliban and other militants as "the enemy."
Jalili said the workers were from four nearby provinces, and that all but three of the bodies had been returned to their homes.
Earlier this year, foreign troops came under scathing criticism for conducting airstrikes based on poor intelligence and causing a number of civilian casualties.
Afghan President Hamid Karzai pleaded repeatedly with NATO and coalition troops to cooperate closely with their Afghan counterparts to prevent civilian deaths, and the number of such incidents has dropped significantly in the past few months.
NATO's Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said last week in Kabul that the alliance has "worked hard" to change its procedures in order to avoid civilian deaths, following U.N. criticism that the foreign troops were behind an alarming number of civilian casualties in Afghanistan.
This has been the deadliest year yet for Afghanistan since the U.S.-led invasion in 2001, with more than 6,000 people killed in militant attacks and military operations, according to an AP tally of figures from Afghan and western officials.
Amerifa, an 11-year-old company, received the contract to build 135 miles of road for the U.S. military last year, Jalili said.
© 2007 The Associated Press
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
9 Comments so far
Show Allall these accidental bombing of civilians in my opinion comes from bad information from tortured people.
What we used to say about the US forces in the British Army.
All the gear but no idea.
Iraq and Afgahnistan are perfect examples of how useless the American troops are, badly trained and little discipline acting out their movie role, hate in every thought of anyone not American. How Hitler would have been proud of them all.
Always very, strongly fitting is the following article by Dahr Jamail, which was posted here the other day, but while I'll use the original url, for Tom Engelhardt provides a very worthwhile intro.
"Iraq Has Only Militants, No Civilians", by Dahr Jamail,
http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174866
Maybe an Afghan surge will help. How about some Blackwater guys on steroids?
Peace808 said This time we made a bunch of widows and orphans, and I'm imagining that it's not easy being a widow or an orphan in Afghanistan.
There are already way too many widows and orphans in Afghanistan. Particularily for the widows its difficult to find work.
NMBill, Exactly, on the dehumanization aspect of it. Just workers, just Afghani civilians..., it breaks my heart every time. I just want to scream: "Would somebody, please, get our U.S. Air Force under control!"
It seems like these reports come like clockwork, every two weeks civilians killed in coalition airstrikes. Often the death toll includes women and children. This time we made a bunch of widows and orphans, and I'm imagining that it's not easy being a widow or an orphan in Afghanistan.
It's time to get out and talk to those "Christians" who support these occupations, and explain that we're supposed to be helping widows and orphans, not making them. And explain that there is a rational answer to the question, "Why do they hate us so much?" And we need to echo the voices of the Iraqi and Afghan leaders when they condemn the deaths.
I would add that even the words "insurgents," "terrorists," and "enemy" are dehumanizing labels that enable wanton killing.
If you are going to draw fire, you may as well do it from your enemies house! You shoot a few bullets and the bombs finish the job when the "Americans" attack and kill their own friends!
JUDGED – JURIED AND SENTENCED TO DEATH BY THE EMPIRE
But it was all a mistake, oh well they were just "workers", good thing it was nobody important.
Try to do better next time… Sorry!
"I don't think the Americans were targeting our people. I'm sure it's the enemy of the Afghans who gave the Americans this wrong information."
What twisted rationalizing! And, if the Americans weren't occupying your county at all?