'Safe' Uranium That Left a Town Contaminated
They were told depleted uranium was not hazardous. Now, 23 years after a US arms plant closed, workers and residents have cancer - and experts say their suffering shows the use of such weapons may be a war crime.
It is 50 years since Tony Ciarfello and his friends used the yard of a depleted uranium weapons factory as their playground in Colonie, a suburb of Albany in upstate New York state. 'There wasn't no fence at the back of the plant,' remembers Ciarfello. 'Inside was a big open ground and nobody would chase us away. We used to play baseball and hang by the stream running through it. We even used to fish in it - though we noticed the fish had big pink lumps on them.'
Today there are lumps on Ciarfello's chest - strange, round tumors that protrude about an inch. 'No one seems to know what they are,' he says. 'I've also had a brain aneurysm caused by a suspected tumor. I'm constantly fatigued and for years I've had terrible pains, deep inside my leg bones. I fall over without warning and I've got a heart condition.' Ciarfello's illnesses have rendered him unable to work for years. Aged 57 and a father of five, he looks much older.
The US federal government and the firm that ran the factory, National Lead (NL) Industries, have been assuring former workers and residents around the 18-acre site for decades that, although it is true that the plant used to produce unacceptable levels of radioactive pollution, it was not a serious health hazard.
Now, in a development with potentially devastating implications not only for Colonie but also for the future use of some of the West's most powerful weapon systems, that claim is being challenged. In a paper to be published in the next issue of the scientific journal Science of the Total Environment, a team led by Professor Randall Parrish of Leicester University reports the results of a three-year study of Colonie, funded by Britain's Ministry of Defense.
Parrish's team has found that DU contamination, which remains radioactive for millions of years, is in effect impossible to eradicate, not only from the environment but also from the bodies of humans. Twenty-three years after production ceased they tested the urine of five former workers. All are still contaminated with DU. So were 20 per cent of people tested who had spent at least 10 years living near the factory when it was still working, including Ciarfello.
The small sample size precludes the drawing of statistical conclusions, the journal paper says. But to find DU at all after so long a period is 'significant, since no previous study has documented evidence of DU exposure more than 20 years prior... [this] indicates that the body burden of uranium must still be significant, whether retained in lungs, lymphatic system, kidneys or bone'. The team is now testing more individuals.
In 1984, having bought the factory from NL for $10 in a deal that meant the firm was exempted from having to pay for its clean-up, the federal government began a massive decommissioning project, supervised by the Army Corps of Engineers. The clean-up did not finish until summer 2007, having cost some $190m. Contractors demolished the buildings and removed more than 150,000 tons of soil and other contaminated detritus, digging down to depths of up to 40ft and trucking it 2,000 miles by rail to underground radioactive waste sites in the Rockies. All that is now left of the NL plant is a huge, undulating field, ringed by razor wire.
Despite this colossal effort, Parrish and his colleagues found high concentrations of DU particles in soil, stream sediments and household dust in the vicinity of the site, deposited long ago when the factory burnt the shavings and chips produced by the weapons manufacturing process: the study estimates that, over the years, about 10 tons of uranium oxide dust wafted from the chimney into the surrounding environment.
The Army Corps clean-up team tested the soil from some of the gardens of houses backing on to the plant, and in cases where it was found to be emitting more than 35 pico curies of radiation per gram they removed it. The researchers discovered dust in and around buildings emitting up to 10 times as much. DU, inhaled in the form of tiny motes of oxide that lodge inside the lungs, emits alpha radiation, nuclei of helium. Unlike the gamma radiation produced by enriched, weapons-grade uranium, alpha particles will not penetrate the skin.
But inside the body DU travels around the bloodstream, accumulating not only in the lungs but also in other soft tissues such as the brain and bone marrow. There, each mote becomes an alpha particle hotspot, bombarding its locality and damaging cell DNA. Research has shown that DU has the potential to cause a wide range of cancers, kidney and thyroid problems, birth defects and disorders of the immune system.
When DU 'penetrators' - armour-piercing shells that form the standard armament of some of Britain's and America's most commonly deployed military aircraft and vehicles - strike their targets, 10 per cent or more of the heavy DU metal burns at high temperatures, producing oxide particles very similar to those at Colonie.
TV footage shot in Baghdad in 2003 shows children playing in the remains of tanks coated with thick, black DU oxide, while there have long been claims that the DU shells that destroyed Saddam Hussein's tanks in the 1991 Gulf war were responsible for high rates of cancer in places such as Basra.
Parrish's team includes David Carpenter, an environmental health expert from Albany University. 'DU burns, it releases particulates that can be breathed in, and it doesn't go away,' he says. 'The issue does not concern military personnel as much as civilian populations in theatres where they are used. Now we know that we can still find measurable levels of DU among the people of Colonie, we need a much bigger study to establish whether they have suffered disproportionate ill-effects such as cancers as a consequence. If they have, it would raise a serious ethical challenge to the use of these weapons. Arguably it could constitute a war crime.'
The NL plant on Central Avenue, Colonie's main artery, opened in 1958 and became one of the Pentagon's main suppliers. DU - the material left in huge quantities by the process of refining enriched uranium for bombs and nuclear reactors - is extremely dense. A pointed rod fired at high velocity will penetrate not only armour but several feet of concrete. In 1979 a whistleblower from inside the plant told the local health department that it was releasing large amounts of DU from its 50ft chimney, which was not properly filtered. The state government carried out atmospheric tests and in 1981 ordered that main production cease. The factory shut three years later.
One of those who has now tested positive is Mike Aidala, 71, who worked at the plant for 22 years and became its health and safety director. 'When it started, the place was spotless,' he says. 'But over the years it got dirtier and dirtier. We burnt the chips produced by the lathes in a steel furnace.' He added: 'A lot of my co-workers died young. Whether the plant was the reason, I guess we'll never know.'
As concern in Colonie rose, a residents' group began to call for a publicly funded health study. For Anne Rabe, a founder member of a campaign that has now lasted for 25 years, the Parrish study represents overdue vindication. 'I do find it very ironic that the US government at state and federal level refused for so long to do anything, and now the UK comes along and has funded these tests,' Rabe says.
Repeatedly, US agencies have claimed that the Colonie plant was reasonably safe, despite the massive clean-up. Most recently, in 2003, the federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry issued a report saying that, although the pollution produced when the plant was operating might have slightly increased the risks of kidney disease and lung cancer, there was now 'no apparent public health hazard'.
Rabe's campaign has conducted a health study of its own, assembling a dossier from personal contacts and by knocking on neighbors' doors. It found that among almost 400 people surveyed there were numerous cases of rare cancers, thyroid and kidney complaints and birth defects.
The main difficulty the campaigners faced in the past is that DU eventually dissolves and is passed in the urine. The US government claimed that the plant had been shut so long that it would be impossible to determine who had been contaminated - so rendering a full health survey pointless.
However, Parrish has developed new, more sensitive methods. At the same time, his impartiality is impeccable. Before his work in Colonie, Parrish tested more than 400 Gulf war veterans, failing to detect DU in any of them - so dealing a serious blow to those who claimed that DU is one of the causes of Gulf war syndrome. 'I did not expect to find it in Colonie,' he says.
Some of those who have tested positive display classic, common symptoms found in DU victims elsewhere. For example, Ciarfello says he was still in his twenties when his teeth 'just started to crumble: they ground down to nothing until they were just these little stumps and I pushed them out with my tongue'. Other members of his family are sick. His son developed a severe kidney condition, while his brother, Frank, can barely walk and also suffers chronic fatigue. A nephew was born with a disfiguring facial skin tumor that has required repeated surgery.
Tom Donnelly, 56, spent 34 years as a foreman at a garage door workshop next to the NL factory, where tests have found high concentrations of DU in dust samples from places such as shelves and light fittings. He has three auto-immune disorders: Crohn's disease, a chronic inflammation of the bowel, total alopecia, and cerebral vasculitis, an immune system-related narrowing of blood vessels in the brain.
'The new tests suggest I inhaled about 4,000 particles of DU,' Donnelly says. 'I used to come to work in the morning and see the chimney blowing its smoke in a thick black plume. Most of us had no idea that the plant was using uranium at all. After all, the sign outside said National Lead. The Army Corps removed all that soil, but they never looked at the dust at all. The effect on my life has been devastating, but how many others are already dead?' One is his late boss and friend Tom Murphy - who, like Donnelly, developed Crohn's and died of it at 61.
Ann Carusone lived in a house behind the plant from the time of her birth in 1966 until 1993. 'When I tested positive, my reaction was sheer disbelief,' she says. She has endured years of a chronic lung disease, sarcoidosis, an inflammation of the lymph nodes usually found in much older people, as well as a blood disorder that produced petecchiae - dots of blood beneath her skin, similar to those seen in some of those exposed to radiation at Hiroshima. In her twenties she had a pre-cancerous ovarian cyst that when removed was the size of a grapefruit.
'I knew many people from round here who died young, in their twenties and thirties,' she says. 'We used to play out in the creek that flowed out of the plant site. The water was sluggish, a weird yellow-green color. We'd splash about in it. Now we know it was laden with depleted uranium.'
'It's very striking how many people in this small group have immune disorders like Tom Donnelly's,' says Carpenter. 'I can say with great confidence that people who inhaled DU are at greater risk of lung cancer, as well as leukemia, other cancers and genetic damage of the type that causes birth defects. Previous responses by official bodies could be said to amount to a cover-up. People have been told that there's no problem, and that's very clearly not true.'
Yesterday NL failed to return calls requesting comment.
Deadly residue
Depleted uranium (DU) is the residue left in massive quantities when bomb-grade uranium is refined to make reactor fuel and nuclear weapons.
The densest naturally occurring metal, it is used to make armor-penetrating shells, standard armament for some of the West's most widely deployed military aircraft and vehicles, such as Bradley armored cars, Abrams tanks, and Jaguar A10 fighter planes.
Less intensely radioactive than bomb-grade uranium, DU emits alpha particles, known to cause cancers.
DU weapons that strike their targets produce clouds of tiny uranium oxide particles, which lodge in the lungs and other soft tissues such as the brain and bone marrow.
DU shells were widely used in the 1991 Gulf war; in Bosnia and Kosovo; and are being used now in Iraq and Afghanistan.
© Guardian News and Media Limited 2007
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
85 Comments so far
Show AllThese links are appropriate to consider:
http://www.radiation.org/spotlight/071206_rachel.html
http://www.radiation.org/
test
The untestable understanding. Its what we are all here to learn about. How much is too much. Try some! Its small! Some more? You sure? O.K. Here.
I don't want any, thanks. No! I said, and don't force it on me! Hey! You are making me mad! Get away from me! Stop!
Its O.K. Its only the local security with your daughter! And DU? Or worse....
If you inhale just one, it could over time, kill you.
BTW I don't belIeve that inhaling nano-particles of sand, or peanut butter and jelly, will radiate brain or lung cells, until cancers form. I really don't believe you get it. Nano particles of DU if inhaled are deadly to life. Trillions upon trillions of them, are now blowing in the wind. Everyplace on Earth.
I dunno GUY, for some reason you have lost me. The way I read your posts, you don't think DU is all that dangerous or a major problem. "If" that is your meaning, then you are posting wrong information as WHO does, that's not really dangerous, I believe the proper word would be, "damaging".
If you don't mean that, could you modify your writing, so an under-educated person such as myself, could understand you?
Testing
Hi Kem, Namaste, and other readers.
KEM, the microparticle danger is true enough and I was not too aware of it. It implies that any particles that small are toxic, whether uranium, teflon, or sand. Certainly using uranium as weapons seems designed to distribute it in the most harmful fashion.
Notwithstanding that, I fail to see how pointing out that people have survived considerably higher radiation doses of microparticles or that even DU could be concentrated and removed from the ecosystem (though it isn't being done so, except at natural rates) qualifies as "wrong and damaging information". I'm not claiming that spots with unusually high levels of particulate DU aren't dangerous; on the other hand, I have lived for a decade in a region with non-trivial amounts of uranium ore nearby, so the impression that proximity to U-238 is automatically toxic worldwide seemed a bit of overkill to me.
Craig
Hi Craig (PhysicsTeacherGuy),
The latest DNA research is onto multiple generation impacts as tagged by epi-genetic markers, specifically for dozens of generations of farmers in Sweden, and observed drought tolerances.
No doubt some future wizkids will connect the dots on radiation exposure and health, as we are now seeing for famine.
Namaste
I failed Math nspire, got good grades in Biology and English though. My teachers there were georgous blonds and they loved me too. I did fale speling though.
PHYSICS TEACHER GUY, Please read the information provided in this link and the link which is provided after the page opens. They are brief articles. You may learn somethng about DU that you are unaware of. Or you may choose not to, that will be your perogative. However, what you posted is wrong and damaging information.
http://www.gulfwarvets.com/du_howkilling.htm
HI KEM,
Yes you provide a good approximation, where 355/113 is even better.
Actually PI is a circle's circumference divided by diameter, which is mathematically a transcendental number, that has an infinite number of significant figures.
I as a scientist, believe in the idea of "significant figures", where one avoids the common error of seemingly higher precision answers by truncating superfluous digits. Many extra digits of precision do one any good, if the problem is inaccurately analyzed, or in error compared to some established standard.
Namaste
Some factors to think about before you panic about U-238, which is what I believe you are referring to as depleted Uranium:
1. Not all radiation is inherently deadly; Boulder, Colorado, would appear radioactive compared to Philadelphia solely because of its altitude which allows more solar radiation in.
2. Not to downplay the dangerous aspects of either uranium (a chemical toxin) or radiation (capable of DNA damage in cell reproduction), but fallout meters in NYC in the 50's recorded doses as high as 5 rem, equivalent to triple the maximum allowed for a nuclear plant worker, due to fallout from atmospheric tests. Since we're all still alive, it must either be a little less deadly than we might think, less able to spread than we might think, or
3. possible to remove. And luckily for us, it is. Unfortunately, we're not doing so commercially. Just FYI, some plants are known to bioconcentrate hazardous materials. Cattails (or Bullrushes) are good for accumulating heavy metals and petrochemicals in their roots, which we could then harvest if we wanted to concentrate waste to remove it from the ecosystem. Some plants do the same for uranium. As an undergraduate, my friends and I discovered that Brazil nuts are so radioactive that they'd be considered low level nuclear waste if you took them into a power plant. Eventually I found out this is because the trees concentrate uranium. Again, if we (collectively) wanted to remove U-238 from the environment, we could do so.
So no, you're not going to die tomorrow Rebel Farmer. And KEM, DU won't wipe out all life on earth - though I'm not certain that it won't help the decline of our species.
Oh, and since this is my first post, I just want to say that I'm not employed by the nuclear industry!
Craig
Isn't it 3.1416?
DU N U M B E R S,
(really stupendously humongous big ones)
1/4 kg of DU is about the same as the 238 g molar weight, which by Avogadro's number we have ~ 6*10^23 atoms, each of which is a 'killing factory'.
I really doubt that we yet know the true extent of DU's high impact burning/ionization/atomization/aerosolation, as various particle sizes would be in a complicated distribution, impacted by weather effects and cooling.
See REF: http://www.idust.net/Tutorial/DURadiation01.htm
4x10^11 alpha particles emitted from 1 gram of U-238 in 1 year's time.
The paid shill-(were_X)-perts are very busy with distorted ways to diminish any and all evidence of culpability, or health risks.
We have many unknowns with dilution, diffusion, scattering and aggregation effects with nearby materials.
I for one wouldn't use the nominal background ratio of radioactivity as my personal threshold, having engineered some pretty complex systems, one ALWAYS wants factors of 10-1000 beyond that as a starting point, because of the things that we don't know that we don't know about (unless costs are an issue, and then we just multiple by pi [3.14])
Looking backwards at radiation threshold issues,
... many people take direct action to mechanically isolate radon gas emission from under their houses. We have various radon concentration that initially come form the natural concentration of radioactive materials in that area's soils, which can be factors of thousands apart even in the same state.
It's perversely ironic that those that build their homes for thermal efficiency, who also likely have solar roofs, are dying from radioactive poisoning from designing far too poor of air circulation (low exchange rates with fresh air).
Google radon gas mitigation scenarios and health risk, as these are less likely to have been co-opted by the corptocrapers.
Namaste
NOTE to KEM, They're picking up the beat and more sticks too
Interesting!
Thank you for that info JUNGLEBOY.
You won't inhale solid DU, when it burns, and DU burns at a very high temperature when used as ammunition and had been fired or exploded. Much of the DU becomes ionized particles in that case. The particles are microscopic, and although indeed they are heavy metal, they are so tiny and light, almost gas, they do easily become airborne and will at anytime a sight breeze distrubs them. They are deadly if inhaled and inhaling them is as easy as inhaling a grain of pollen.
When DU was used in the First Gulf War, the result was a high increase of radiation readngs in England. It requires special meters to detect DU radiation. Since that happened in England, the company which was responsible for taking and releasing the readings to the public was taken over by a sub-contractor of Halliburton. The true readings are no longer released. ___And the beat goes on.
I'm going to post this again for others and I have been maening to talk with you all about it and how to do reasonable education on the subject, with out sounding all fanatical and crazy. My timing has been off lately, work is an ongoing thing that takes all my time.
I'm hoping to be able to put this in perspective, lets say one mission of your specter gunship and the clean up it would need.
Thank you for the reply and lessons NSPIRE.
Perhaps you are unaware, that a Big-Blu bomb, contains over a ton of DU and when it explodes, ALL of the DU is ionized and the nano-particles of poison in the resulting cloud of smoke, can circle the globe in 12 days.
In a single cupfull of DU, there are over five billion of those nano-particles of death. Inhaling just ONE can cause cancer of the lung or the brain, if the particle crosses the oflactory bulb and enters the brain. Once lodged there, it will bombard brain cells with over 10,000 times the radiation allowed by a single chest X-ray and bombard till death of the accidental victem.
That is just one bomb, a C-130J Spectre gunship, can fire off several tons of DU ammo on a single mission. There are about 3 cupfulls of DU in a tank shell or perhpas 15 billion invisible to the naked eye, nano particles of death, blowing in the wind. We have used hundreds of thousands of tons of DU since the mid 1960s and now our military and over 30 other nations fire it daily on military ranges all over the planet.
I can only guess to how much of the four billion plus years lasting DU is now in our atmosphere, floating on our waters and lying on our lands, but I would guess, it is far enough to eventually kill all life on this blue and white water planet we call home. We have some time left to have fun though. Our grandkids will have far less time here than we did I fear.
By Dr Kenneth E Miller
DU radioactivity = 0.6 Natural Uranium Radioactivity (Will treat as same)
In Soil, Concentration of U is 0.7 to 11 ppm, and 15 ppm in farm soil
In sea water it is 3 ppb (3.3 mg/cubic meter)
Assume in this context that ppm and ppb are ratio of masses, not ratio of particles
Assume concentration of 10 ppm is safe (becuase this is the natural concentration)
What Dilution is needed to bring a 1kg slug of uranium down to 10 ppm?
This is the dilution that would make a 1kg exploded DU shell safe.
1) In Water:
At 10 ppm, need 1e5 kg water to dilute 1 kg uranium
1e5kg water is 100 m3 of water
Thus 1 kg shell exploded over lake or stream should disperse very quickly and be safe
2) In Air:
Air has a density of 1.3 kg/m3, so it would take 1.3e5 cubic meters or air to dilute, which corresponds to a box 50m by 50m by 50m
Thus if exploded in air, the uranium would disperse very quickly and be safe.
3) In dirt:
Dirt has about 3 times the density of water, so it would take 30 m3 of dirt to dilute a 1kg slug of uranium to the safe level.
4) In dust:
Uranium is heavy and may settle as dust. Assume that the uranium mixes into the top 1 mm, and that the dust/dirt mixture has the density of water of about 1000 kg/m3. Thus it would take 1e5 square meters of land to reach this dilution, or a patch 300 meters by 300 meters. It is reasonable to assume that a 1kg shell exploding when it strikes a tank will be dispersed over this area, and thus be safe.
a) However, if it is not distributed evenly, there could be spots that greatly exceed the concentration of 10 ppm and that might not be safe over the long term. But being exposed to a concentration 1000 times larger than natural for 1 minute is like an exposure to the safe natural background level of 1 day.
Uranium decays by releasing an alpha particle. According to Wiki, "Because of their charge and large mass, alpha particles are easily absorbed by materials and can travel only a few centimeters in air. They can be absorbed by tissue paper or the outer layers of human skin (about 40 micrometres, equivalent to a few cells deep) and so are not generally dangerous to life unless the source is ingested or inhaled." This means that for uranuium to cause a problem, it must be ingested or inhaled. Specifical, consider the above 4 examples, and how one might go about ingesting the uranium from the dispersion method described. Also, consider how it is dispersed in warfare, and how one might ingest quantities 1000 times greater than what is described above.
KEM and NSPIRE
This is a mathematical outline I had a friend do for me. Its a little biased and is probably a little off but I would like you to look it over for me. It has only to do with background ra. If there are any points missing let me know besides weather factors or anything incalculable . Can you add to this? Josh
Hi KEM,
You ask me "And where exactly do you get your technical data and math odds NSPIRE? You sound so sure of yourself, how many years have you spent studying the issue? Just wondered."
Yes, I do act and sound confident, out of my accumulated experience and life-long pursuit of knowledge (40 yr physics & EE).
Yes, I've been wrong (and willing to acknowledge that).
Yes, I have exaggerated the "facts" as I know them, w/o the requisite scientific formalism and review, "like three lightning strikes on Thursday", but to make a point: there's millions if not billions of more likely ways any of us are going to die, but stress is an almost guaranteed killer.
As to DU health impacts and spreading dynamics, I've designed and built microchips using ERFC calculations for diffusion of dopant gases like arsenic heated over silicon wafers, and thus know that these equations are those that better experts than I, would use to thoroughly calculate DU exposures across distance and time variables.
But of course, when you add weather, the prognosis for clarify is partially sunny at best.
The reality of health risks in our techo-toxic-garbage filled world, is no simpler than global warming - and we know how well that has been going.
Science takes time (and openness), and consensus building is immensely challenging, with so many evolving specialties and synergistic interdependent connections. What we read through ICCC is what the international assemblage can all agree too (now) about global warming, while the worse possible impact findings and theories have yet to show a preponderance of evidence. What gov corpocraptic interests wave around is outlier and isolated paid for crap (not refereed and mostly well accepted as true).
It is about the "I" of art and the "we" of science, the former is individualistic and unique, while the later is emergent and would eventually come out regardless of 'who gets their names on the equation'.
Thanks for asking, as I'm both an artisan of truth/beauty and a scientific expert on learning new things (published in only narrow circles about things other than DU).
Namaste
P.S.
Coincidence, truth, science, and human interactions - are always going to be stranger than fiction, as I believe strongly in how our spiritual lives can guide us.
The volume control is set very low for most - as how often do we really give our hunches and intuition a chance to set our courses?
Wow, it didn't take long for this thread to reach the bottom of the list. Achives, here it comes, like nuclear waste, out of sight, out of mind.
For all those who want to know the truth about the health effects of low doses of radioactivity pls read the book:
"Wings of Death : Nuclear Pollution and Human Health" by Dr. Chris Busby
Paperback,Green Audit books
For those who can bear to see the results of DU ammunition (genetic damage) used in Iraq go to:
http://www.nodu-hiroshima.org/gl/toyoda_eu/
More information on toxicology /health effects:
http://www.uraniumweaponsconference.de/speakers/busby_hamburg.pdf
http://www.iicph.org/docs/DU_Human_Rights_Tribunal.htm
Hi Aymon,
It makes no difference to Cheney Inc. if half of the working class dies extracting his oil. There are still plenty more to cook his meals, make his clothes, haul his garbage, besides, another generation is waiting in the wings.
Rebel Farmer,
Read Omar Khayyam.
When I was a youngster, a newly married couple, our family friends and neighbors, decided to get away from their home in Michigan, fearing another world war after Japan had attacked China and Germany later invaded Poland.
They went to a beautiful south sea island where they aquired jobs working at a new resort. ___ They both died on Decenber 11,1945, when Japan bombed the resort and airport. They were right, we did get into a world war.___ The grass was actually greener in Michigan.
ezeflyer; Find the right place and i'll move there. I always thought about New Zealand. Clean air, beautiful scenery, and very nice people.
proaltenergy; I read about miso's effect on casualties of Hiroshima and Nagesaki many years ago. You brought up some good sources to combat the effects of radiation.
UN-common_dreams; I like your posting very much and of course the battle for survival and cooperation is an uphill one, but it is worth the effort. Maybe the only cause to fight for!
pacplyer; Very good. "Truth tis stranger than fiction".
I just watched a 75 minute video on VEOH (subscribe to this free site if you haven't because the selection of channels is excellent and it's all free). After I made an earlier post stating:
PaulMagillSmith November 19th, 2007 3:33 am
"Kem, my friend, you are exactly correct. I know there are other mitigating factors involved (diet, increasing obesity, etc), but prior to 1945 diabetes was considered a fairly uncommon illness. Now it is common and increasing.
Consider this also. With tens of thousands of well paid employees in thousands of American Cancer Society offices & labs across the US, billions in government funding (and whole estates donated), what is their incentive to find a cure? As difficult as it is to get stories out about DU through the corporate controlled MSM isn't it easy to imagine a cancer cure might not even get any coverage? Or cures bought by Big Pharma to put up on a shelf?"
,it's kind of odd I should today find a video that supports with facts what I intuitively prognosticated. What the speaker in the video states, (a highly respected author on numerous eclectic subjects BTW), is that Big Pharma took over medical school boards of directors, also the FDA, and then they worked to 'cook the books' on cancer research results. Here's the link (when the site opens click to see the full version of "Big Dirty Business of Cancer"):
http://www.veoh.com/videos/v291325JXcQ5hZp cancer treatment suppressed by FDA
By the way, KEM, the 'edit' feature only works once.
You guys that are skeptical about DU dangers, should go back and read the links Paul Magill Smith posted. They're an excellent learning tool. Or, just be blissful, you know the saying about bliss.
The edit function will not allow me to edit that last blog and make corrections. DANG.
Yes AYMON. BTW where have you been? ___ srely missed you now for many weeks, a hearty welcome back.
The government denies DU is dangerous. Many do not believe it is. The facts and reauts of its use contradict that assesment and now no one dares admt the horrible error, of ever usning DU for ammunition. IN 1945 the scientists who worked on the Manhatten Project, knew what DU was capable of as a weapon of terror and its killing power. President Truman forbade its use. Eisenhour over rode that decision and the rest is history. NOw that over 30 nations posess DU ammo, our miltary feels we woud be at a severe disadvantage if we banned it. Ant htat is so, DU is wonderful for use as bullets cannon shells and bombs.
Hi AYMON,
We're all puzzled, the sign to DC reads "give all hope of reason, yee that enter".
Your question is valid, and while the PACs pile on bribes to ignore all elements of truth, logic, and/or common sense -- it thereby undercuts our reasoning. One cannot even just follow the money any longer, as things are too convoluted.
Human health takes a backseat to profit, and efficiency is hardly relevant when profits are so high. Remember as well that crass elitism and "Christian" fundamentalism, cloud the view of any human elements to consider (collateral damage is don't care).
Honestly, the true health impacts are likely going to center upon the local Iraqi kids playing kickball all day in the dirt, and climbing around burnt out tanks - and mostly wont show up for decades. Some radioactive deaths occur sooner due to where the poison ended up, synergistically combined with some prior genetic conditions.
Namaste
And where exactly do you get your technical data and math odds NSPIRE? You sound so sure of yourself, how many years have you spent studying the issue? Just wondered. Google DU and you will find over one million articles on the subject. Some of the first you come to are written by government officials, or shills, they who lied about Agent Orange and many other important things.
I am puzzled about one major issue about DU that has not yet been discussed at CD over the past deveral months of very informative and knowledgeable commentary by Kem Patrick and others. The equation does not compute logically, so to speak. The contradiction is this:
If the intent of US imperial warmongering is to steal Mideast oil to avoid peak oil in the Western World, why would the US military contaminate the land mass of Iraq and next, possibly, Iran with DU weapons residue of such deadly menace? Would that not prevent efficient and without-health-risk oil extraction, which presumably is the intent of colonising and ethnically cleansing the oil land mass in the first place?
Any suggestions Kem Patrick and others?
REBEL FARMER,
There is always room for hope, and you're more likely to be:
_1._ hit by lightning three times (on a Thursday),
_2._ live, and
_3._ win the largest lotto ever held
-- then die from DU.
Unless you're considering that volunteer job of vacuuming Iraq?
Namaste
"Hope springs eternal"...and the fat-lady hasn't sung yet (which in no-way is meant to encourage-overmuch, or 'excuse' the continuance of this asinine and self-defeating continued use of DU-weaponry and/or 'test/practice-releases'...).
Many people can/will survive the current-levels of released-toxins (and many-won't -- although MOST cockroaches/rats will...). But, DU-use must be reigned-in (obviously), and 'quickly' [as must several-other of our 'current practices', as illustrated by the following].
I very-much doubt any/much of Julius's last-breath is available to you today (or even several-decades after "Sic Temper Tyrannus") -- this, owing to our ecosphere's past-ability to 'fix' carbon-dioxide/etc. into varied-substances/lifeforms. [Unfortunately, _your_ last-breath may be around/available for quite some time, by contrast -- since there is now FAR more such gases released than can be accommodated by those natural-processes...].
One viewpoint/crisis, or another -- we SOMEDAY have to 'slow down this bus' (or at-least get better-drivers...).
Man/science can make very-few substances 'not' to be found in Nature ... but that's no reason to concentrate and wallow in isotopic-poisons. [As my grandfather so-often said: "It's a poor-bird who shits in it's own-Nest"]
Yes...this planet will easily 'shrug-off' all traces of mankind's foolishness to date (although even-it is hardly 'immortal' -- its only been-around a few-billion years, and that likely makes it 'middle-aged'). That is no-reason to anthropomorphise this planet into some kind of 'conscious-being or benign-parent' (no reason not-to, I suppose -- but just don't expect it to "wisely reach-out to succor your Interests"...it 'won't'; you'll have to do that for yourself, I'm afraid).
Our DNA is adaptive, but fragile...we'll ultimately need to 'seed it elsewhere' (no doubt, consuming many-more planets for 'success') for any security regards eventual-'maturation' -- denying Technology by seeking some-form of 'sustainability' right-here [on Gaia, if you will] is a self-imposed death-sentence -- since the easily-exploited resources required (and painful-experience) are already exploited/spent.
IOW...Keep on truckin', but some of us need to 'smarten-up', and relatively-soon...
War crimes - enabled by our troops. War criminals are what war criminals do.
REBEL FARMER. There is little hope that we humans can stop or reverse the process of Earth's demise which we have initiated. So have fun and enjoy your life as much as possible Rebel. Life is far too short to let anything get us down to just worry. Anyway, there will be an afterlife and I do hope to meet you someday when the time comes.
Okay, folks, this ain't funny no more. You still didn't answer my question. Is there any hope? Or should I just "eat, drink, and by merry, for, tomorrow" I'm gonna die?
Hi KEM,
Forgot to mention that DU is essentially a waste product made while extracting scant U235 from heavier and more prevalent U238. It is the U238 that makes up the majority of DU, with minor performances by various other radioactive decay products. Remember though that the DU-oscar (for significant complications, leading to death) can be won by the supporting cast members too.
See http://www.bt.cdc.gov/radiation/isotopes/uranium.asp
Namaste
KEM, I'm LOL about the possible solution you envisioned.
Basically the genii is out of the bottle, and as entropy wins in these situations, it always takes much much more energy and money to reverse a mixing process. Even if Cheney (and his 1000 best friends) *converted to humanity and donated all their ill-begotten gains - we'd have a chance of cleaning up only a portion of this new mess.
The current set of human vacuum cleaners, don't need extension cords, until they're bed ridden in a few decades. It is part of the hidden job description for those considering the economic advantages of serving in our (I salute your warrior commitment, dedication, and code) armed forces. My family used to run out of (and quickly back into) some of those swamps in S.C., back when Francis Marrion (the swamp fox) targeted red coats, which today would likely be what black coats?
The most familiar example of IONIZATION is the illuminating plasma formed within neon lights, which when the power is turned off, no longer glows. Another situation is the cross-linked proteins, like in our eyes, which show up as opaque cataracts. When highly energized, atoms become ionized (at various levels) which leads eventually (soon) to combine with other atoms (sometimes violently) and reach a new equilibruim.
I really don't know the end product of DU's ionization, but suspect it grabs onto whatever is near. I do know that plutonium is a natural radioactive by product of laboriously long uranium decay, so that's where the miners find it (with U).
Plutonium -- like lead, selenium, and arsenic -- is a very poisonous metal, that just happens to have an extra factor of radioactive impact. Luckily for the victims, the plutonium metal kills one faster than the radiation alone would (it takes an excruciating several weeks to die from various doses of radiation alone, while just a few days for the metal poisoning (as I recall).
Namaste
*Cheney and Co. likely already have me in their sights, and I'm not too optimistic about their eventual plans, so baiting them is possibly a short lived joy -- which I see little reason to attenuate.
As for the comment that DU is a natural element to nature, I do believe that is false. IONIZED DU like plutonium, is a man made poison. Plutonium has been found to exist in trace amounts in nature, and uranium is very common. Yet it is very rare to ever find natural plutonium. It is not rare to find it in nuclear power plants and nuclear storage areas however. Of course we all know that cleaning up the nuclear waste on Earth to any reasonable degree is impossible, at least until or unless, some new science is discovered which could destroy it.
There is uranium pollution all over western South Dakota and in parts of Wyoming in that area also. Literally hundreds of mines and test holes all over western SD are just open and exposed, with piles of tailings. Rivers in the area have tested with high levels radiation and there is suspicion of high cancer and birth defect rates in some of these areas linked to this.
at www.defendblackhills.org
OK, DU is a problem but let's have some perspective here. I'll bet Cheney is making a fortune.
REBEL FARMER
Asks:
1. "what is the long range probability that the planet could be saved?"
The prospects of "harming" Gaia are negligible, as this is the stuff literally that makes up the bones of the mountains. Over a third of the internal heat that floats the continents over the Earth's mantle is generated directly from radioactive decay energy releases. Gaia is pretty much untouchable, if you consider that the 'Deinococcus radiodurans' bacterium is the most radiation resistant of all known organisms, and that it lives and thrives inside the water cooling core of highly radioactive power plants.
It is the breathing lifeforms ones that initially need to worry about maintaining their distance from locations where the DU enhanced dusts are blowing (essentially everywhere, eventually - for all types of life).
And then asks:
2. "Can the DU that is already out there be "put back in the bottle"? If so, how?"
Life forms with DNA are seriously impacted, especially when minuscule DU motes (mixed into the dust) are carrying into our bodies, causing mutations (most being eventually fatal). Most raw uranium ores have a insignificant density, compared to DU, so harm is generally not possible w/o refinement, concentration, and target vaporization. Ingestion is a form of containment, improving the relative odds for those nearby, but cremation is then a bad idea.
Vacuuming up a few cubic km of IRAQ is a very unlikely solution, but even so, where does all that go? It could be re-refined back to a concentrated form, but it now rests like radioactive raisins (DU) in baked bread (dusts). When we compare this "deadly bread" to the original ore, we'll find that initially there was a much higher uranium to raw ore densities, which was "worthy" of being mined economically. The trouble visualizing this situation is that the raw ore was evenly distributed in a solid, but at a much higher concentration, than the resultant radiative dusts which are easily suspended in the wind. The dusts are also continually mixing with more dirt and spreading.
NOTE: For those less scientifically inclined, we're talking about extremely small (atomic scale, 10^-15 m) pieces, which are then juxtaposed into our macro scale world (few cubic km = 3*10^9 cubic meters) -- that is commonly known as one part in 10 raised to the 24th power (1 and 24 zeros), which is about proportional to the number of stars in all of the galaxies, compared to our one local Sun. This is meant to explain the relative sizes here, not the actual densities present, which I'm probably off by only a factor of a million or so (10^6). As another gauge of atomic scales, consider that Julius Caesar's last breath ("et tu Brutus") expelled so many atoms, that each of us (on average) inhale hundreds of those same 2000-yr old fateful atoms, on every breath (of each of our lives)! Luckily for us, those were NOT radioactive atoms.
Back to the deadly bread analogy, if we were to use the original ore, both the "raisin size (U235) and loaf would be significantly smaller (i.e. denser), as the non-uranium mix is proportional smaller than DU to dust ratio. It's now both more distributed (less dense) _and_ more deadly (concentrated tiny little raisin bunch motes) now flying in the wind.
Luckily for some, chelation therapy and advanced ingestion of alternate salt (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelation_therapy) can purge some of the poison, but good luck trying to get the VA or a HMO to pay.
Is it good news?
That we're all more likely (in the USA) to die of bad HMO care than this DU stuff, but they will continue to abuse us with it, until the supply runs out (when we no longer need or use A-bombs and power plants). No doubt plausible deniability makes a hard uphill case to prove that this smidgen of DU caused this cancer . . .
Namaste
You don't have to put any poxes on us JONNO, we've already poxed ourselves and the rest of the world many times over.
Hi REBEL FARMER, long time no see. Nope, I do not see how it would be in any way possible to clean up the DU, and or any other nuclear waste which has escaped being "safely" stored away from now thru perpututity. For one thing, this is a water planet and it only makes sense that the highest percentage of the airborne DU waste ends up in our oceans, where it kills life there. Of course there is still an ample amount of DU particles to permanently poison all of the dry land also.
The oceans are where life evolves on Earth and so there we are. When our ocean's and planet's precious phytoplankton, which supply our atmosphere with near 70% of its oxygen die off another 20 to 25%, we will act on the problem. Our act will be to die off at at a rate of 100%. ___ Life is a bitch sometimes. This is neither fun nor funny.
I would like to thank all Govt's and those in the nuclear industry for poisoning all of the world, over the years since the birth of the bomb we have just about radiated most of the world and caused many unexplained diseases and defects in the human race, as well as animals that inhabit this radiated world,this being the worst of the pollutions that have been spread about,I remember as a teen in the 50's while the worlds powers was testing nuclear devices in our oceans and islands etc that when there was a device exploded there used to be radiation alerts on the radio, so even back then it was known that the MIC and Govt's was polluting the world,but all this didn't matter as world domination was the agenda and who cares about the results, a typical bully's actions, A pox on all your family, and I do hopes you suffer as much as your actions have made so many more suffer,The genie is out of the bottle and I don't think there is any way or stopper to get it back inside.
NSPIRE, thank you for the math lessons. Somewhere I got lost as to your opinion of can the DU alreasdy released be cleaned up and if so, how many vacumn cleaners and extension cords would be required for the job?
That would be a safe bet NIETZSCHE.
Hi KEM and Paul! Knew you'd be here. Where is Linda?
This is getting more depressing every time this subject comes up. My question is, are we past the point of no return? If we could get DU weapons stopped today, what is the long range probability that the planet could be saved? Can the DU that is already out there be "put back in the bottle"? If so, how?
I have been campaigning against so-called "DU" for years. There is no "Safe" Uranium. We have unleashed the terror unto the people of the middle east and our military that will plague them for many generations.
The United States - the world's primo Terrorist.
Morality and consequences aside (as if that were possible), DU is understandably a toxic waste product that must somehow be "handled".
Our country has chosen to expedite the removal of this extremely dense metal, the "Metal of Dishonor" (a book; don't recall the author), by spewing it out of barrels of our troops' weapons -- toward "others". While this does provide seemingly both economic and military (apparent) advantages, it is really humankind and Gaia that carries the waste around for hundreds of thousands of future generations (in their bodies, and twisted DNA), compared to simply burying it deep inside some salt mine.
And for those that understand the simple physics of increased destructive momentum (denser is better at penetrating & killing targets), one still might ask why not use palladium or another similarly dense but non-radioactive metal? DU'h, that stuff is really expensive and scarce, and we'd still need to put that nasty DU someplace too (we should get awards for the 2-for-1, and saving the taxpayer billion$).
BTW, there are multiple reports that the M1-Abrams tank gunners have significantly higher incidence of rectal cancer, since sitting on top of the storage cabinet for DU shells. That might incline those gunners to preferentially fire those rounds at civilian targets (not armored), just to get that dangerous $hit out of their tank sooner. I guess their are too few volunteers to look up the army's a$$, and check for institutionalized cancer, or more likely those that get too close are just ignored.
It came all to close to home one day, when my 6 yr-old son visited one of my work places (where DU is perennially used for tank target practice), and while I was taking pictures of desert flowers he found several 10-30 mm brass shells (notably the _less_ dangerous side of the cartridge). The location was ~ 10 miles from the target range, but when I inquired with the locals, they said that the army would overfill DUmp trucks, and the shells just bounced out along the roadway. Oh great!
Namaste
("my" light within acknowledges/reminds the light within you)
KEM PATRICK, I feel the same and think the same thoughts, which are basically: are we doomed as a species? The damage is already done and there's no going back. Sure, there will be and are more toxic areas than others, but eventually, DU is going to affect almost everyone on Earth.
Whether one study says that DU is no problem and others say that it is really doesn't matter because the truth is that whether it is a gamma, alpha, or beta emitter of radiation, once inside the human body, it is going to cause problems.
What I would like to see done is a study of groups exposed to the same radiation. The purpose of the study would be to compare those who eventually got ill (which would probably be almost 99%) with those who didn't. If it were proven that for some reason, certain people were "immune", it would be very interesting to discover why. Perhaps that is the only way I can find some hope for the children yet to be born on this sick planet.
If there was a way to isolate and understand what it is that prevents the few from acquiring a radiation related illness, then perhaps a way can be found to cure those who are suffering and slowly dying from inhaling a speck of DU.
Another thing I don't understand is why do they even try to clean up these sites? To me it makes much more sense to leave it all right where it is. The very act of digging and loading and moving this contaminated soil and facility simply spreads the radioactive dust even more and causes more harm than good. I think the best that can be done is to bury the entire spot with a special concrete and make it a place where nobody is allowed to enter.
I'm sure it's not as simple as just covering everything with a thick layer of concrete. But to me it seems to make more sense to let it be and not dig and "clean up" the site because it creates more problems than it solves.
When are those in positions of power going to put aside their greed and think of the people rather than their bank account? There shouldn't be one more cent spent on nuclear power plants anywhere in the world. I know that France has been fortunate and most of their energy is produced by nuclear power, but these plants have a lifetime and the time will come when they need to find a way to handle the deadly waste.
A few quotes from the man who discovered that E=MC².
"He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake: science for him the spinal cord would fully suffice. This disgrace to civilization should be done away with at once. Heroism at command, senseless brutality, deplorable love-of-country stance, how violently I hate all this, how despicable an ignorable war is; I would rather be torn to shreds than be a part of so base an action! It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder." -- Albert Einstein
Through the release of atomic energy, our generation has brought into the world the most revolutionary force since prehistoric man's discovery of fire. This basic force of the universe cannot be fitted into the outmoded concept of narrow nationalisms.
For there is no secret and there is no defense; there is no possibility of control except through the aroused understanding and insistence of the peoples of the world. We scientists recognize our inescapable responsibility to carry to our fellow citizens an understanding of atomic energy and its implication for society. In this lies our only security and our only hope - we believe that an informed citizenry will act for life and not for death.
A. Einstein, 1947
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." -- Albert Einstein
I saw a television program (on Worldlink TV, I think it was) that showed doctors in Baghdad trying to cope with babies born with birth defects and cancers after the Gulf War. That program was produced before the current war of aggression. It must be that much worse now. And yet, Madeliene Albright's "we think it's worth it" response to a question about the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children keeps echoing through my consciousness. I think the entire MI-complex would say the same about DU-induced illnesses: "we think its worth it in order to have the armor-piercing shells needed to kill the bad guys." The technocratic fascists don't care about a few thousand people in upper NY state. It's merely a small factor in their calculations.
Uh sorry Billy, I understood that burning coal, which often has trace amounts of uranium, has the same effect as burning depleted uranium on a smaller scale. Of course we burn a lot of coal world wide and have done so for many years, but I'd doubt it is as dangerous as using DU for weapons as far as the end result goes. Sorry I even mentioned coal, thought it was one of your pet peeves.
Every one should read what Paul M Smith posted and take the time to read the links he offered. Paul is a qualified expert on the subjeect of DU and several other issues and knows what the score is. The score is, four billion to zero against humanity and its the top of the ninth with two outs and Bush is up.
This is just one of many indicators that bear witness to the fact that the USA is the greatest manufacturer of horror on earth.
As much as I'd like to subscribe to the optimism and commitment of UN-common-dreams, I guess the more I read, the more cynical I become...the more I read and the older I get the more I'm ready to say "so long, it's been goo..
Brownie didn't arrange for that Public-swindle (which transfered the private-obligation from those who profited from polluting upstate-NY and supplied the government with this destructive-garbage) -- it was the governor of NY who arranged this 'bailout' and taxpayer-fleecing...
And Yes...I can attest that we are ALL 'exposed', by now (not just Iraq/Kosovo/Kuwait). The National Guard and Army-bases all over the world (and right at-home in the US) have fired literally-countless tons of DU 'downrange' in useless "practice". In Germany, when I was a tank-commander there in '68, the sheer-tonnage of DU-rounds incinerated/exploding year-round at the Grafenwoehr-range alone, was 'stunning' [Parrish should test around-there, next?]. No different, btw, at Ft. Knox, KY., or at Camp Greyling, MI...
What should be remembered (or rather, 'discovered' -- by all) is that NONE of this was due to 'ignorance', nor can the US-government 'plausibly-deny' the foreknowledge of all the Negatives, as mentioned-above. The 'value' in DU's "eternal-effectiveness" upon the post-Conflict/nearby civilian-populations was very WELL KNOWN, in even the late-1940's. Truman himself (after being informed by 'military experts' proposing/touting the use of DU in dust-involved/dispersal weaponry to 'poison the well' in Target-areas) subsequently 'put his foot down', and labeled it a 'satanic-WMD' -- and forever-forbade the Pentagon from contracting for it's adoption (it was, presumably, under either Eisenhower or JFK that presidential-clearance was later-granted and prohibition-lifted for all-following US military-adoption of any DU-weaponry).
[I would note, as my 'opinion', that the USSR had also banned DU-development after the 1940's...so, even the excuse of "MAD" cannot apply-to/excuse the madness of the US military-complex in promoting (and 'sanitizing'-through-Propaganda by calling it 'safe' and just an "effective armor-penetrator") the widespread use/adoption of DU-weapons...]
Despicable... and there are ways we can protect ourselves and prevent cancers, even cure cancers, but the big pharma/drug companies don't want people to know about natural therapies that heal people...
It was found in Japan during WWII that people who ate a lot of Hatcho Miso (a form of miso-soybean fermented) did not suffer as much from ill effects from the bombing... you can also take chlorella, kelp and other greens and immune modulators such as AG Immune by BodyWise. also intravenous Vitamin C by a doctor, integrative/complementary type, can mitigate cancer... there are numerous other supplements and therapies. The basic idea is that no illness, not even cancer, and this was found in the early 1950's, can live in an oxygenated area... the more oxygen the less cancer. there are substances that do this, not only oxygen, but ozone, for instance, which has been outlawed except for use by a medical doctor in Nevada... there are answers/solutions... they want people to feel helpless and to give up, don't !
To me the two most significant sentences in the article were these:
"In 1984, having bought the factory from NL for $10 in a deal that meant the firm was exempted from having to pay for its clean-up, the federal government began a massive decommissioning project, supervised by the Army Corps of Engineers. The clean-up did not finish until summer 2007, having cost some $190m."
Here we have the US government bailing out a private, for-profit firm at taxpayer expense, then denying/covering up the negative health impacts of the earlier, for-profit practices. Heckuva job, Brownie.
A Good Christian would not wish this lifetime and generational sentence on his worst enemy. The satanic death cultists of the US and Israeli administration and military, the makers of bombs just like the toys of children, shells made of forever dust radiation to burn the body till death, and chemicals to rot your very being, down to your DNA, and that of your children, and your land, breeders of the killing deadly germs of tomorrow, are selling the stuff to all and anyone in the world, and spreading and firing it around like there will be no tomorrow. Perhaps there will be no tomorrow. To stop such awful developments would be to change the nature of civilization (which has such dirty connotations nowadays), and the understandings of all human species (whose chances of medium term survival are close to zero, given this display of collective intelligence). Only humans permanently poison their own fellows, and their own world, to spiteful gain a brief advantage over some other human groups.
Some of the soldiers will come back and develop cancers. And as a result, the general
population will eventually come to know about the horrors of DU. And perhaps, depending on what civilization looks like by then, they may even prohibit its further use. But I bet the US military exposure is just a tiny fraction of what the civilian population of Baghdad gets. Pity the masses. This is an horrendous crime. Where is there justice?
There should have to be reparations! Trumped up charges of WMD = lies. Anthrax scares = lies. Iraq somehow a threat to the USA = lies. There should HAVE to be reparations.
KEM,
"...the DU emmitted from burning coal..."
DU is a byproduct of the uranium enrichment industry. It does not occur in nature. Coal may, and usually does, contain some uranium but it is not depleted uranium.
If a coal power plant does not have particulate filtration of some sort, the smoke plume can contain significant levels of uranium and other radionuclides.
Some of the coal in China is so high in uranium that the Chinese are setting up a system to treat the fly ash and cinder from some coal plants as uranium ore.
Regards,
Bill
Kem, my friend, you are exactly correct. I know there are other mitigating factors involved (diet, increasing obesity, etc), but prior to 1945 diabetes was considered a fairly uncommon illness. Now it is common and increasing.
Consider this also. With tens of thousands of well paid employees in thousands of American Cancer Society offices & labs across the US, billions in government funding (and whole estates donated), what is their incentive to find a cure? As difficult as it is to get stories out about DU through the corporate controlled MSM isn't it easy to imagine a cancer cure might not even get any coverage? Or cures bought by Big Pharma to put up on a shelf?
I've posted so many blogs on this issue I'll take another approach. How about some facts from others?
http://www.mindfully.org/Nucs/2004/DU-Secret-Nuclear-War14sep04.htm
Sick soldiers
A sixth of the Iraq war veterans have already sought treatment
Only 467 US soldiers were officially wounded during the 1990-91 Gulf war.
But according to Terry Jemison at the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), of the more than 592,560 discharged personnel who served there, at least 179,310 — one third — are receiving disability compensation and over 24,760 cases were pending by in September 2004.
This does not include personnel still active and receiving care from the military, or those who have died.
And among 168,528 veterans of the current conflict in Iraq who have left active duty, 16% (27,571) had already sought treatment from the VA by July 2004.
"That's astronomical," says Rokke, whose team studied how to provide medical care for victims, how to clean contaminated sites, and how to train those using DU weapons.
Rokke admits the exact cause for these casualties cannot be confirmed. But he insists the evidence pointing to DU is compelling.
"There were no chemical or biological weapons there, no big oil well fires," he says. "So what's left?"
A prominent US international human-rights lawyer, Karen Parker, says there are four rules derived from humanitarian laws and conventions regarding weapons:
1) weapons may only be used against legal enemy military targets and must not have an adverse effect elsewhere (the territorial rule)
2) weapons can only be used for the duration of an armed conflict and must not be used or continue to act afterwards (the temporal rule)
3) weapons may not be unduly inhumane (the "humaneness" rule). The Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 speak of "unnecessary suffering" and "superfluous injury" in this regard
4) weapons may not have an unduly negative effect on the natural environment (the "environmental" rule).
Parker and others took the DU issue before the UN in 1995, and in 1996, the UN Human Rights Commission described DU munitions as weapons of mass destruction that should be banned.
http://www.nogw.com/warcrimes.html a link to war crimes
Do you remember seeing cancer treatment centers twenty years ago, in every city of any size at all? Did we see many chldren with cancer twenty to thirty years ago? We see them now, lots of them. When did we begin to see daily ads on television, for cancer treatment centers? Did we see a rash of autism cases twenty to thirty years ago? Now it's advertised to be near epidemic levels. DU causes autism BTW, before and after a birth.
I recently read an article where the author stated that autism has not risen in the past 100 years. He wrote it is just easier to diagnose now. Really, I wonder who paid him to write that?
Actually DC BELTWAY, that is a misconception about fallout from atomic bombs. DU is far far worse and much longer lasting. One prime example is Hiroshima, it was relatively safe to live there, not long after the bomb was used, millions live there now and their cancer rates are average. Not so in Iraq, it will never be safe to live there.
And yes indeed, the DU filled dust does enter the upper atmosphere and does traverse the entire globe wihtin a few days. Our mlitary has likely expended more DU ammo here on military ranges than in the Mid-east. The troops are advised it is perfectly safe, unless one goes right near where it had exploded and burned. DU in solid form, such as a the ten pound amount in a tank shell, or approx three cupfulls of death, is rather safe to handle, I wouldn't wish to handle any solid DU and then lick my fingers though.
The real danger is when DU burns and DU burns at a very high temperature, the result is a cloud of deadly smoke, filled with nano partiles of radio-active specks that can kill any living thing. The poison is blowing in the wind, ______ everywhere on the planet.
Do you have children, do you love them? ___ Me too.
I wonder if there are any linkages to the DU and Breast Cancer rates. One in eight women gets Breat Cancer and cases are increasing all over the world. I believe its definitly environmentally related with exposure to toxins. KEM if its up in the atmosphere now as you say God help us all. The MIC is killing everyone on the planet and militarism must be stopped before the entire planet is poisoned...if it isn't already too late. Damn these bastards for wanting to start nuclear war with Iran as nuclear fallout related toxins will be even worse than the DU!
"DU shells were widely used in the 1991 Gulf war; in Bosnia and Kosovo; and are being used now in Iraq and Afghanistan."
I understand they first used DU shells in the 1967 war by Israel aganist Egypt. And many of our recent retuning soldiers have been diagnosed with cancer... What a fate for Middle East world of children and innocent civilians. We are sick in more ways than just DU cancer and even now Hanford, Washington folks are still suffering from a multitude of radioactive tests…We may have more neighbors in the US with radiation sickness than Japan which was nuked!! Estimates are about 1.2 million US neighbors… Appears that Love thy neighbors is a lie too. If we can't take care of own the rest of the world is very deep trouble from a disturbed empire its population mostly watching sports games and movies.
The incompetent, corrupt FBI said Jose Padilla was trying to build a dirty bomb. No evidence was produced for this allegation, but Padilla was convicted on ludicrous evidence and sent to prison. Meanwhile, we find out that the government is the one dirty-bombing people in Iraq--and in America.
I fear it is too late to save humanity, the amount of atomic waste, (including DU and the DU emmitted from burning coal), which is already strew all over the planet, and especially in our oceans, is beyond belief.
DU ammunition is used daily by at least thirty nations. An AC-130 Spectre gunship will burn out several tons of DU on one mission. There are over five billion specks of ionized DU in a single cupfull of burned DU. Inhaling a single speck can cause cancer. A single microscopic speck of DU in the body will radiate more than ten thousand times the amount of radiation allowed by a chest or tooth X-ray and radiate till death of the person who inhaled it. And will then continue to radiate forever in the casket or urn of ashes.
For children, DU is far more dangerous, as their immune systems are not fully developed. They may suffer from a variety of diseases, including autism, cancers, diabetes, etc. DU will also alter DNA and that can cause birth defects in a fetus. There is so much more that is damning about DU, that one could write a trilogy and not cover it all. What I will never, ever, understand, is why our press and media is afraid to cover the issue on a daily basis and tell the damn truth. ___ No, __ they cover Paris Hilton and such. __ We are nuts.
We don't have enough people with cancer. It's good for big pharma and the medical profession to have cancer patients. I know quite a few people who have come down with cancer. The latest report from the government is that cancer rates have gone down, and we know we can trust them 100%, can't we.
The plutocracy has the best medical care paid for by us taxpayers, so they're not too concerned about their health; they'll let their doctors worry about them.
Depleted Uranium>/b>
Depleted Uranium, the new panacea
The Arms Maker's choice with a half-life of only 4.5 billion years.
Workers in DU must wear exposure suits and respirators
Just a creative use of atomic leftovers.
Dense, hard, it punches through armor like tissue,
Vaporizes and fragments into dust and tiny chunks.
Dust to be breathed and chunks to be imbedded
As shrapnel or become buried in earth.
Battle tested in Desert Storm and Kosovo,
Now everyone is making them, and selling them,
To armies around the globe, eager for the latest thing.
Meanwhile, the Iraqi desert and Kosovo are laden with tons.
Pay no attention to the sick and the dying.
The Government says it is anything but DU.
Agent Orange was all in the mind, too.
Birth defects and cancer are coincidence in Govspeak.
A hundred or a thousand years from now,
When Hussein and Imperial America are long forgotten,
Or are but spooky tales told around the campfire,
As a new civilization tries to grow.
Peasants, trying to coax food from the ground will stir up clouds of dust.
They, their children and their animals will slowly sicken and die,
And they will know not why.
Just collateral damage from a weapon long ago.
Steve Osborn
19 February 2003
It just keeps getting better doesn't it?
What a hell on earth these dogs of war produce. The more they manipulate the world, the riskier it is to be around them. I used to live in the desert. Strange sludge's were dumped in piles decades ago and nobody knows what's in them. I have all kinds of health problems like the ones mentioned above, but one thing that is clear is that it rarely results in immediate death. Your immune system fights to the death to save your body so you die slowly.
I also was exposed for years to a lot of nasty stuff including these "explosives" hauling them on 747's for MAC. Hopefully, the dust didn't get on the crates and into my lungs with the wind whipping through the fuselage. RA (restricted articles) or DG (dangerous goods) hauling is big money. This chit is too dangerous to put aboard the downstairs bellies of passenger aircraft, so it was bid to DOT approved cargo only aircraft that we had and required a top secret clearance to pilot.
We always wondered why in decades of flying this stuff, nobody ever broke out the dosimeter equipment as required by FAR op specs. Radioactive signs were supposed to be posted around the aircraft and radiation wipes were supposed to be used each RI over 25, iirc. I never saw the ground agents use the protective equipment. If you asked questions like this, you were a "trouble maker" and you were no longer working there (the book "Catch 22" comes to mind.) Later the FAA and DOT gave us an exemption to the 50 RI limit so that we could load any level of hot stuff with no restrictions. We used to joke that when we got to the hotel that night that we wouldn't have to turn on the light switch because: we were already glowing in the dark baby! Was the stuff loaded correctly? Was the dust venting overboard on top of your houses? Who knows? We just hoped the DG specialist spaced the explosives away from the corrosives so we didn't get something unfortunate like a magnesium fire that nobody could put out in flight (makes it's own O2.) We were so busy launching (at that time) the world's largest commercial aircraft we didn't have time to ensure anything else was done in the one hour we had to preflight, fuel, load, flight plan, load computers, do paperwork, and fight with inoperative equipment and weather and airport and airspace difficulties.
The flight engineer would take a quick glance at the DG buildup which was encased in plastic, and be off to check the security of the other remaining 250,000 lbs of freight on the main deck. We never even inspected the lower holds (ground guys did that).... who knows what was put down there.....
Year after year of this kind of crazy lifestyle made it seem normal. What I learned just recently was that the ballast present in the counterbalanced flight control surfaces of the 747 is also DU! I just can't seem to get away from this menace.... The chit is everywhere.... Odds are, if you've got a military base, a shooting range, a railroad or a highway near your house, you may have been exposed. Common toys and consumer items have been discovered used with DU.
Even a common wristwatch that glows in the dark is painted with tritium. Is it safe to have that against your skin 365 days a year? I dunno. My wife has a large mother mary full of the stuff in our bedroom. Is it dangerous?
Godddam it's tough to be human in this screwed up world. The only thing you can be sure of is that these big corps/big gov will never tell you the truth, because it might get in the way of what they're doing. Hell, they even control our news! How come we haven't heard about these problems that have been going on since the 1950's? Why even watch the news anymore? It's 90% propaganda for the weak-minded.
It's enough to make me want to move to a desert island and stare at the ocean all day. (Oh, wait, I'm already doing that.) How long do I have before it goes underwater?
Sweet Jumping Jesus!
pac
"We're not going to make it are we? (people I mean)" - John Conner
"It is in your nature to destroy yourselves." - Terminator
From the article: "...Arguably it could constitute a war crime."
[ *All* wars are crimes! -one way or the other...]
Many native / aboriginal peoples of this world have an innate respect for the areas where 'radioactive' materials occur naturally in the ground. They often consider such areas very special, if not actually 'sacred'.
They don't need Geiger counters to measure the special energy existing in these areas, -they have the *natural sensitivity* of people who both love, respect, and live in harmony with Mother Nature. -They already know what's what.
Such people do not mess with these areas, they leave well alone, and so no injury arises. But later tribes, -the parvenus, (as in: 'we upstarts') came along and dug the ground and began playing around with this stuff.
And because some of our race are very *VERY* sick people, they began to wonder how they could use their bits of new-found knowledge to harm, (not help) fellow members of the human race...
"Fools rush in where angels fear to tread" -says the old maxim, and none have been quite so foolish as the egomaniac *military chiefs, the politicians and the scientists* who, (together) conspired to mess with things they ought never have fooled with, in order to make their ever-more insane weaponry.
As with any pendulum, what is pushed one way, will then swing back. A nation that is arrogant enough to play with fire will surely get singed; their blind nuclear tampering will singe others, as well as create self-immolation.
We are, -lest we forget, actually just *one HUMAN FAMILY*, so when we hurt others, -one way (and) another, we also hurt ourselves...
For the human race to progress (as it must) we must root out ALL that is harmful and unnecessary in this world, not only the disgusting *material* lumps of weaponry in all it's diabolic panoply, ~ from guns, to bombs, landmines, chemicals, and gases, et al, ~ but we also need to root out all that's wrong in our racial *consciousness*, because as long as we have warped minds, and warped hearts, we will keep on inventing ever-more evil and insane things with which to harm each other...
__________________________
In a nutshell, that's the basic challenge facing all progressive people everywhere.
And yes, it's one heck of a job, but yes also, it *can* actually be done, -because no minds anywhere, -no matter how morbidly intransigent, are wholly set in stone, - *all* minds are malleable, to a greater or lesser extent.
We cannot readily unpick what has already been done (as with these DU messes) -but can now only help those who've been damaged.
But those who were *behind* such tragically erroneous schemes must be identified publicly, and set to work for the rest of their days to do whatever they can to lessen the harm they have caused.
And people similar to this myopic breed, either the sick oafs at presently at the helm, or those who would seek to replicate such gross errors (once in office), must, *by the will of the People*, never be allowed anywhere near the corridors of power until they have foresworn all such lunacy, and will announce their 100% commitment to do all in their power to end warfare and separations between Earth's tribes, and begin the important work of destroying satanically large stocks of weaponry.
As a race, we need to begin *proper human relationships* with ALL fellow human beings, in place of whipping up yet more totally unnecessary wars...
Sounds impossible?
No, -no at all! All it takes is the WILL of the people, -we ordinary folk, and it can happen sooner than anyone would believe: *Imagine*, -not just ONE Dennis Kucinich in power, but a WHOLE government made up of forward-looking, rational 'radicals' like him!
We could, (actually) make that happen, -if we tried hard enough.
This site is called 'Common Dreams'.
If we made that VISION of worldwide peace and cooperation 'common' -and more widely spread, the 'dream' part can become a reality.
At present, my dream (as stated above) maybe 'Un-common' but then, ~ we have to start somewhere!
"Anyway, It's *my* dream... ~ ...and I'm sticking to it!"
(c:
To abuse the local environment as was apparently the practice at this factory is unconscionable.
Burning the uranium chips was probably done as a safety practice. The chips are an extreme fire hazard until they are disposed of. To burn them without filtration with profoundly irresponsible, even with the level of environmental awareness in the 50's.
While the long term effects of low level radioactive exposure were and are controversial, the toxicity of uranium is not and was well known at the time.
I hope Parrish has sufficient funding and interest to expand his study so that statistically valid conclusions can be drawn.
Here I was thinking of leaving the seashore before the sea levels rose and moving to the Rockies, but now they are full of DU. Europe is too close to the boiling Middle East, S.America is too poor, Asia too polluted and crowded, Australia and NZ are too far away, Alaska is too cold...what the hell? And we can't escape DU anywhere we go because it travels around the earth in the air! Is the oligarchy planning on moving to the moon to escape from their shit?
Good idea WILLO. All of those who have visited Baghdad have already done that however. It will take a few years, but every one of them is a dead person walking, as are any who live in Iraq and our ground troops who served there. The radiation readings in downtown Baghdad are over 2,000 times the normal background level. We'll see soon enough. It's everyplace. Here is just one of thousands of links on the subject.
www.protecthawaii.ws/page2.html
For the people in our government who say that DU is safe I would like to do an experiment with them. They should be required to breath some vaporized DU. If there is no toxic effect they shoudn't have anything to worry about.
Just the fact that it's a heavy metal like lead should tell you something. Then throw in the radiation on top of it. This just might be mass genocide by our twisted leaders. By now we know they are capable of anything. eg.9/11
There are uranium tailings 90 feet high and several hundred yards long on the banks of the Colorado River one mile from downtown Moab, Utah. The uranium dump lies in the Colorado flood plain. The US DOE lies about the danger. This uranium is not even depleted. A single flood on the upper Colorado could instantly wreak more havoc than 50 Katrinas by destroying the drinking water for nearly 30 million people including San Diego County, Los Angeles, Phoenix, Tucson, Las Vegas and environs. A mudslide of similar uranium tailings destroyed the Rio Puerco in rural New Mexico. Meanwhile, as we await the big one, whenever the wind blows, the uranium dust just lodges in the lung tissue of the millions of visitors who go to enjoy Canyonlands and Arches National Park. Google this stuff and make peace with your higher power.
That's correct POET. Ionized DU is also all over the United States and everyplace else, because the deadly microscopic dust gets into our upper atmosphere and is carried around the globe in less than twelve days. It is also test fired on many military firing ranges, thousands of tons of it is now available for inhaling by all. A Big Blu bunker buster bomb, holds over a ton of DU and when they explode all of the DU is ionized. That is when DU becomes deadly, a single speck inhaled, will insure eventual cancer. DU is indestructable and will be deadly for over four BILLION years, or essentially___ forever. DU will kill any living thing, including microbes.
Pay attention! The dust at Tony Ciarfellos playground is also all over Iraq, Afghanistan, and anywhere else in the Middle East where American armaments and munitions have been used. It has been carried home in the bodies of US military personnel and their equipment and will be passed on to us and our children. Like Tony Ciarfello, it won't spiring forth all at once (we might be able to more easily connect the dots that way). As we allow the sowing of the wind, we will surely reap the whirlwind of consequences.
"The main difficulty......is that DU eventually dissolves and is passed in the urine." What does that mean? This is the most toxic crap in the world, how could it possibly dissolve.
There is an article in the news right now about the huge numbers of childhod cancers in Iraq. Everyone over there is going to slowly die of cancer or some other disease because their immune systems have been attacked from inhaling DU. The same goes for our troops, and anyone else who had been in that region for any length of time.
Of course, the same goes for any, almost anyplace on the planet now. It is just that there is a lot more DU concentrated In Iraq than most places and the more specks of the poison one inhales, the faster it effects their body.
I wondered how soon it would be for this article on DU to be shoved off to the side, essentially buried. ___ Not surprised, but bewildered. This subject and global warming should be the most important of all. It is self evident that DU use will result in the end of all life on this planet within a very few years and few wish to address the issue or even think about it. ___ Am I crazy, or just stupid?
Heyyyy, someone just put the picture of the DU bullet in under the article's title. Thank you, it isn't buried anymore.
Albright is a 'Realist' -- just like Bush, the other neo-Con assholes, Clinton, most of the US 'top 1%' and Forbes-400, Kissinger, and virtually-all of our 'once-Indoctrinated and Included' leadership -- in the US and most of the World (including, notably, Israel, Iran, Russia, Britain, France, Germany, etc.).
They are 'pressing-forward' with the view of a 'new world order' they hope will eliminate the 'evils and inefficiencies' of Nationalism -- and if a few-billion die in-process "so what -- we are over-populated in a non-sustainable economy".
Who can say...maybe once they have their NWO, it will morph into something 'worthwhile', and result in 'one happy human-society, all holding-hands' (rather evocative of Southern-Christians looking forward to a Heaven, where they actually enjoy the company of those they quite despised/hated while 'earning their entrance').
What I (and likely many-here) despise is their methodology/means -- not their 'ends' [that, in the end, is what has 'enabled-them'].
More-likely than a happy NWO, what we may end up with is short-term Extinction, thanks to the Greedy-few who have adopted and pursued this 'revolutionary' econo/politico-'philosophy'. Straussians from UofChi just built-upon Plato's "New Republic", and tied it to Zionistic-thinking evolved over the 1800's (and resulting in most of the strife of the 1900's).
Since I read that contrary/impediment 'thought-crimes' are rapidly becoming 'illegal', I want to say "good luck" to all-here -- while I still-can -- and suggest that you learn to resemble 'good-Germans' until some Liberator (or 'fate') frees us all from this banal-'thinking' that is leading us to ruin.
Regards our Future...what should-be will no-doubt, ultimately, come-to-Pass...(or, so-says Darwin, and most of the 'Prophets').