Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Cluster Bombs: Realism and Reality
Despite opposition from the US, Russia and China, a global effort to ban cluster munitions is gaining ground
The global effort to ban cluster bombs will save lives because it is putting reality above "realism". At a meeting in Geneva this week many states held up "realism" as the reason why states should aim low and go slow in response to the suffering caused by these weapons. But the reality is that a new treaty is on the way - and we can make it happen by the end of 2008.
The reality is that over the past 12 months a strong group of likeminded countries has worked with NGOs, the United Nations and the International Committee of the Red Cross to build a freestanding multilateral process which is now developing a treaty to ban cluster munitions. This "Oslo Process" (named after the first conference in February) provides a mechanism through which states can act on the values of humanitarian concern, justice and human rights without being held hostage by so-called great powers. The next in a series of meetings takes place in Vienna on December 4-7.
By contrast, at this week's annual meeting of the UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) states such as the US, Russia and China sought to reassert influence over the issue. This was clearly a response to the Oslo Process. We heard a lot about the need for realism and the need to be realistic about what the international community could achieve on cluster bombs.
When these same powers were blocking work in the CCW last year the Oslo Process took responsibility for delivering an international response to the problem of cluster munitions. Now that there is clear progress, China, Russia and the US are desperately trying to reassert control. In return for them begrudgingly admitting a humanitarian problem with these weapons, they expect the rest of the world to accept that nothing substantial can be done.
In the world of "realism", we were told this week, this is what happens - a few big countries call the shots. The Geneva meeting saw a conference room but no real conference. Almost all delegations were frozen out of the real business of "informal consultations" through which the countries that matter worked in the backrooms to identify the lowest common denominator. And the lowest common denominator is extremely low.
In Gordon Brown's speech at the Lord Mayor's banquet on November 12 he reaffirmed the UK's commitment to a ban on cluster munitions. In fact the precise phrase he used - "ban on cluster munitions that cause unacceptable harm to civilians" - is drawn directly from the declaration of purpose of the Oslo Process. Perhaps more important, though, are some of his other comments: "This is the main theme of my remarks this evening - we must bring to life these shared interests and shared values by practical proposals to create the architecture of a new global society."
The Oslo Process is part of that architecture. It is not only about specific weapons but about how individuals, organisations and states can work together to find better expression of their shared values - and it is succeeding. There are more than 80 countries on board, half of the world's producer and stockpiling nations, a commitment to a prohibition in 2008, a draft treaty text that has already been discussed once, a defined set of meetings ahead in Vienna and Wellington with negotiations set for Dublin in May next year. This process has the full support of civil society and is driven by the full participation of individuals and states directly affected by these pernicious weapons.
The UK should be a leading actor in this process. In order to take up such a role the UK should not waste too much more time pleading the case of "realism" but should approach the up coming meetings with renewed vision, positive commitment and urgency. And, of course, the UK needs to get rid of its remaining cluster bombs.
Thomas Nash has been the coordinator of the international Cluster Munition Coalition since 2004.
© 2007 The Guardian
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


13 Comments so far
Show AllWhat do U.S, Russia and China mean by "realism"?
Hell of a good idea, ban DU munitions as well.
O.K. Let's get real - I mean really real and banish this phony 'realism" notion, get rid of this "aim low and go slow" business - because that's what it's all about isn't it - BIG BUSINESS/lots of $$. Really, cluster munitions are "good" dollarwise for the nations with corporations that build the bombs, and they are "good" for those who buy them and are more interested in using them as weapons of terror with great lasting power - they just go on killing and killing and maiming and maiming. The majority of persons who get killed or maimed are noncombatants - lots of them just kids at play or farmers trying to make a living.
Let's urge the U.S. to also "get rid of its remaining cluster bombs" - not by selling them but by defusing them. Anybody know a good use for defused cluster bombs?
A good use for defused cluster bombs?
Scatter them around Bu$h's "ranch" in Crawford.
He could have lots of fun clearing brush.
The US will be, as usual, abtaining from the community of civilized nations when humanitarian treaties are implemented. We like to see ourselves as generous and peaceful people, but in fact we are the stingiest of donors and the leading manufacturer and user of weapons. Then we wonder why people hate us.
Get rid of clusterbombs and clean up the ones left behind. The peoples of Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan have suffered enough from their effects.
Clusterbomb the neocons.
@ onelove, dcbeltway & ezflyer:
Assuming y'all ain't trolling: is this our common dream, wishing for more death and violence?
Back to the real world: among the munitions uncovered in Iraq recently were unexploded bomblets and detonators from cluster bomb bomblets -- they were apparently intended for IEDs ans ERPs -- now that is a novel way to support our troops!!!
One only has to go to YouTube and listen to the Dylan classic "Masters of War" to get a grip.
The farmers in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam can't work their fields today without the fear of being blown to bits from a Nixon-Johnson American cluster bomb left almost 40 years ago.
And Iraq is so poisoned from DU that anyone who has spent any time there runs the risk of creating deformed children ON THE GENETIC LEVEL.
So what makes America so great? Do tell...
dcbeltway November 17th, 2007 11:12 pm
Get rid of clusterbombs and clean up the ones left behind. The peoples of Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan have suffered enough from their effects.
The farmers in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam can't work their fields today without the fear of being blown to bits from a Nixon-Johnson American cluster bomb left almost 40 years ago.
Sorry, forgot a few countries.
But George Carlin said it best. Global warming will take care of itself. The planet will shake humans off like fleas on a dog and keep on spinning.
Wonder why the new new Bushie compound is in Paraguay and how long Kenny Boy Lay has been minding the store?
Those were the immediate three that came to mind as they were recently clusterbombed but I am sure there is a whole list of countries we could come up with Sandyk77.
Chuck Cliff,
It's called the law of karma,or you reap what you sow. If we were to put those "defused' cluster bombs all over the Crawford "ranch", I'm sure bu$h would cry NIMBY !
Death and destruction is what this pResident has brought the world, and our troops. Let him experience it for himself. Since he hasn't been in combat, how can he have any understanding of the hell that it is? This "windshield cowboy", to quote Vicente Fox, pretends to be this big Texas rancher, yet he can't even ride a horse. He lived in Dallas, when he wasn't in the Governor's mansion in Austin, having his naps, video game time, and long trips to the gym. He only got the place in Crawford after he was re-elected to a second term as governor and decided to run for President, so he could appear to be a rancher. He didn't have any interest in being governor the first time, let alone the second, evidenced by how he abandoned the term he was elected for. I have lived in Texas most of my life, and suffered under this man as governor. Some of us tried to warn the country about him, yet enough sheeple bought his pack of lies and deceit-not just once, but twice. The sad but true joke here in the Lone Star State was that Texans voted for him to be Prez so he would get the hell out of Austin and not damage this state anymore. I don't want more death and violence; I want this man to be held accountable for all the unneccessary death and violence he has caused. I was raised in the Methodist church. He claims to be a Methodist, yet if he would be true to himself, the country and his God, he would renounce all violence and war, as the doctrine of his stated religion calls him to do. Yet more deception and lies. Support our troops? Yeah, bring them home now.
There are over one million cluster bombs in South Lebanon, 'sent in' with compliments of Israel (US & UK approval) in the civilian areas. To date thousands have been mutilated AFTER last summer's war. Roads, crop fields, schools...