Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
'Green Mortgages' Taking Root
First came green homes. Now comes a mortgage to match.
So-called green mortgages are the latest innovation in the push to promote more energy-efficient houses, whose owners enjoy lower utility costs thanks to solar panels, improved insulation, thermopane windows, and other money-saving products. Also called energy-efficient mortgages, they allow home buyers to qualify for larger loans on the premise that they can afford higher monthly payments due to what they save on heat, water, and other utilities.
In effect, the mortgages pass energy savings on to homeowners in the form of increased buying power.
"It's the most efficient way to allow people to capitalize on the value that green homes create," said Lisa Davis, development project manager for Olmsted Green, an energy efficient, 287-unit residential complex being built in Dorchester, "and it has the potential to make places more affordable to people over the long term."
The concept is still in its infancy. And the mortgages are easier to secure at large-scale housing developments that incorporate "green building" construction where energy savings have been documented by engineers. Green financing is harder to come by for energy-efficient, privately owned, single-family homes, since the savings are more difficult to calculate and must be done on a case-by-case basis.
But energy-efficiency advocates, lenders, and housing activists say green mortgages are a small but significant step toward making homes more affordable and reducing dependence on nonrenewable energy sources.
"As energy costs increase, homes that have energy efficiency are going to be better for the home buyer in terms of their financial stability," said Peter Milewski, director of the mortgage insurance fund for MassHousing, which lends money to low- and moderate-income home buyers. "Anything that can reduce and stabilize the cost of energy in this volatile energy environment is a good thing for us to be involved in."
The simplest form of green financing offers discounted closing costs to buyers of energy-efficient homes. In August, for example, Bank of America launched a "green mortgage program," now called the "energy credit mortgage program," which offers $1,000 back to buyers of new construction homes that meet Energy Star energy efficiency requirements.
But green mortgages that let buyers borrow more money are more complicated and are designed to have greater consumer impact.
MassHousing offers its energy-efficient mortgages, which are partially financed by Fannie Mae, through Bank of America and NE Moves Mortgage LLC, the home lending arm of Coldwell Banker Residential Mortgage. Besides Olmsted Green, MassHousing's energy-efficient mortgages are available at Forbes Park, a loft community being built in Chelsea where green initiatives include a power-generating windmill.
Environmentally friendly building products such as bamboo flooring, recycled glass tile, and other luxury upgrades are not enough to qualify a house for green financing. Instead, homes must have features like Energy Star appliances, programmable thermostats, fluorescent light bulbs, geothermal heat pumps, and water submeter systems.
For homes that can demonstrate substantive energy savings, MassHousing will increase a buyer's debt ratio - the maximum percentage of gross monthly income they can borrow - to 45 percent from 41 percent. A savings of even $50 a month could translate into an additional $12,000 to $15,000 of buying power, he said.
In expensive real estate markets, that may not make a major difference, "but it makes buying that house a little more comfortable," said Milewski, who estimates that utility costs account for 10 to 15 percent of average total housing expenses.
MassHousing has financed fewer than 50 green mortgages since the program started in 2003, according to Milewski. About one-quarter of those mortgages were for single-family homes; the rest were for condominiums and housing developments where energy efficiency has been quantified, he said.
Green mortgages are "a great idea," added Peter Dion, director of finance and acquisitions for MassInnovation, the developer of Monarch Loft, an energy-efficient condo complex in Lawrence where home owners will save an estimated 25 to 60 percent on utility costs depending on how warm they keep their units. "In my opinion this is the wave of the future."
© Copyright 2007 Boston Globe
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


3 Comments so far
Show AllNot sure these are "green mortgages" even if that's what they're called. It just means purchasers get some upfront breaks for buying a house that's energy-efficient.
But what about purchaser qualification, overblown list prices, lending rates, insurance, taxes, the whole list of factors that are leading right now to millions of Americans facing foreclosure?
In a better world, these kinds of "green mortgages" could be celebrated, but probably not now.
The USA is the most over-housed nation in the history of the world. Obviously, there are many individuals who are under-housed, but on average ...
Overhousing, like housing people in inhospitable environments, is one of the significant contributors to global warming.
Larger houses require more electricity, especially in hot climates. Electricity generation is a prime cause of CO2 emissions (see carma.org) and global warming.
Larger houses require more land, which contributes to suburban sprawl, which contributes to longer commutes, which contribute to CO2 emissions, which cause global warming.
"Green mortgages" are not about allowing people who couldn't otherwise afford a house to be able to own one. And they're not about allowing people who could only afford a minimal conventional house to move up to a more energy-efficient one. They're about allowing loan originators to underwrite to higher monthly payments (enabling even more over-housing), so that more debt can get incurred, so that mortgage bankers can make more money.
The sub-prime market is obviously played out, gotta find something new.
Grass may be green, but so is the dollar.
Green mortgages should be more than just energy-efficiently. A comparison of family size to house size and the construction materials of the home should also be a consideration.
In my opinion any house built overly large for the family living in it shouldn't get a better deal. Give me a break I know families of four that live in 6000 Sq. Ft. and bigger homes. They like most of the other American's I know spend most of their time in a small area of their home and the rest of it is for show. As far as I'm concerned if they want to live in a home far bigger than their basic needs they should not receive any discounts for it.
The construction materials of the home matter greatly. The house should have more than just energy efficient appliances how about sustainable building materials. In many parts of the country the houses could be built of straw bales and/or adobe (rammed earth) materials thus saving on our forest. These types of homes are superior to stick frame construction in many ways. How much of the home is going to be built out of recycled materials is another factor.
There are probably other items that need to be considered in a green home and any discounts in not only the mortgage companies but also in the government/service industries. The two listed in this post should be considered equally important as energy-efficiently.