Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Making Connections: Activist Sets Up Telephone Talks Between US, Iranian Citizens
A Somerville peace activist with a knack for political theater set up a display yesterday with a simple proposition: Let anyone who passed by pick up the phone and talk to Iranian citizens, giving regular citizens in both countries a chance to do what the activist said the country's leaders have failed to do: talk to each other. (See; EnoughFear.org)
Most people passing the Boston Common's Park Street T stop shrugged at the display: a red telephone with a retro design, symbolic of the hotline established between the White House and the Kremlin during the Cold War. It sat on a small table with a white table cloth and a sign out front, which proclaimed "Direct Line to Iran." An MIT student stood to its left, listened in on headphones and provided English-Farsi translation.
The activist, Nick Jehlen, had connected the display phone to a cellphone, which he used to dial the numbers of people in Iran he had met online. The idea was that random Bostonians could chat directly with Iranian citizens.
At times, it looked better than it worked.
Several times, the calls were dropped, leaving one particularly animated Boston Common caller to assume that he had insulted the Iranian with his direct question: "What do you think about your leader there?"
"He hung up on me," declared the caller, Dave Walsh, 48, a construction worker.
After several minutes, the connection was reestablished, and Walsh got his answer. The Iranian caller - organizers declined to identify the people on the other end of the line - was no fan of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran, apparently referring to him with a derogatory term.
"I think ours is, too; George W. Bush. I think they're both idiots," Walsh responded.
But the comity dissipated when Walsh switched topics: "What's Iran's problem with Israel?"
As Walsh became agitated, Jehlen encouraged him to pass the phone to the next person.
Jehlen, a magazine art director and consultant who helped organize the "Turn Your Back on Bush" protest at the president's second inaugural, said the idea came from conversations he had with Iranians on an Internet discussion forum.
"They wanted to speak to Americans," he said.
Connecting a cellphone to a stationary phone was as much a practical move as it was symbolic. The alternative, handing a cellphone to random passersby in Boston Common, did not seem very smart, he explained.
Sarah Shugars, a 24-year-old graduate student at Emerson College, said she had heard about the effort through an e-mail group. She was the first to step up to the phone and exchanged pleasantries with a 25-year-old Iranian painter.
"So what do you do? Do you work, go to school?" Shugars asked.
After conversation about the job prospects for painters in Iran and Shugars's life in America, she asked: "May I ask how the US is portrayed in the media in Iran and sort of what the general feeling toward [the United States] is?"
"She says that Iranians don't have any problems with Americans in general," said the translator from MIT, who is from Iran and, like the Iranians on the line, gave only her first name, Rana. . "It's just your president that is very problematic and is giving Iran a hard time."
Erica Jones, 30, of Quincy, watched for a while from just outside the entrance to the T station.
"I think it's a good idea," she said. "We can learn what's really going on, because the government's not telling us."
Still, she eyed the line of about five people waiting for a turn on the phone, and decided she did not have the time.
Vicki Halal, a teacher from Medford, got on the line to ask whether her Iranian counterpart had any hope for the future. This time, the man on the other end spoke English. His response, Halal said, was that he did not, not as long as Ahmadinejad was in charge.
© 2007 The Boston Globe

30 Comments so far
Show AllWhat an interesting idea and a unique way to make a point. Such a simple message in the age of technology...establishing an actual dialouge with real people to discuss issues and further educate each population. This organizer should set up this table outside the White House and in the halls of Congress.
Reminds me of when Bush said "they hate our Freedom".
Like us, they hate Bush's Freedom!
I would ask "Did you know that Western Intelligence framed Mossadeq in 1953?".
what a novel concept !!! Communication as a means of facilitating understanding . Alert the press (ooops, maybe not those guys :-)
what floors me is that there are not IRC channels where americans and people in the ME can talk. or IM venues where they can connect. but maybe someone here knows of something.
i wonder if the spooks are preventing this. for sure they are messing with peoples' posts on wikipedia.
There are a number of great foreign films available from Netflicks and other sources that can forge a direct and emotional link with the people of Iran. I highly recommend one called " Children of Heaven."
And although it is set in Afghanistan, "The Kite Runner," the book, now a movie, does the same. They are not the "scary other" that the warmongers want us to believe. They can only perpetuate this lie of separation with our ignorance. People are just people everywhere! Find out for yourselves!
Starofthesea thanks for your kind note. Iranians and Afghans are lovely people and are amongst my family members. My husband is originally from Afghanistan.
Most of us, "Iranian" or "American", recoil in disgust at the behavior of our so-called leaders. A groan of apathy each time a newspaper is flipped open and some high ranking grunt vacates his spleen with the old lies of fear, threats and terror.
The 'hot line' is good PR. Authority may shriek "let's have a war" and we'll ignore them until they disappear.
From Cindy:
House Resolution 333 for the impeachment of Vice President Dick Cheney is off the House floor, and has instead been sent to the Judiciary Committee for "further study." This maneuver, organized by Pelosi and the Democratic leadership, is consistent with their mantra that impeachment is "off the table." But, we are told Nancy Pelosi is reported to have replied to the question of impeachment that if she received 10,000 hand written letters she would proceed with it. What are we waiting for?
Cindy Sheehan wrote this:
Dear Friends
Instead of sending your impeachment letters for Dick Cheney to Nancy Pelosi's office, send them to my office so we can get an official count.
Please send them to:
Nancy Pelosi
c/o Cindy Sheehan
1260 Mission Blvd
San Francisco, Ca 94103
Please pass this around and have them sent by Friday, November 16th and we will have them delivered to her office in San Francisco before Thanksgiving.
Spread this far and wide so we can take sacks of letters to her.
Don't include anything besides the letter.
Love
Cindy
I feel Abbie and Jerry are smiling on you.
" we'll ignore them until they disappear."
Sorry, but that doesn't get it. What do you do to a rabid dog who keeps on biting people? What do you do to a serial murderer who keeps on killing? What do you do to a war criminal who piles war crime upon war crime, littering the world with bodies of old men, boys, women, and young girls?
IGNORING THESE CRIMINALS IS PARTAKING IN THEIR CRIMES.
If anyone here knows the chat rooms where one can chat with Iranians please provide links.
You can also reach out to the Iranian American community at home:
http://www.niacouncil.org/
Big Government = Big Corporations
All here should keep in mind the fact that, despite what comes out of their mouths, all of today's politicians are merely lapdogs of huge corporations who might growl but would never dare to bite the hand of the one who feeds them: Big Oil. And big oil wants one thing: War and instability in the region to drive up oil prices; esp: to drive up the prices of Texas Tea.
Any country (e.g: Iraq and Iran) who dare to flood the world with cheap oil and refuse to take worthless paper dollars (backed up only by printing more worthless paper dollars) for that oil can expect to see an aircraft carrier anchor off shore with ill intent.
There is nothing wrong with flooding Pelosi (the daughter of a Baltimore power broker) with Cindy's petitions. Just don't expect these dynasties in power to really do anything until their masters start shouting.
And the only way to make corps start shouting is to cut them off with a mass boycott of all products they peddle.
Support the little guy. The farmer out the back of his pickup. The little in town store that charges too much. Shun any food product encased in plastic.
You'll be healthier, happier, and you will help us win against the evil of ogilopilies (near monopolies) of which we all suffer. These monsters have hijacked our government, and we must endeaver as Teddy Roosavelt did, to break them up into smaller, competative entities.
So while we try to negotiate with this seven-headed hydra (the fortune 500), let's keep a hot poker in the other hand.
Starve the Beast!
on your side,
pac
This is comical. I can see the FBI or CIA right now with their wiretaps listening in. They probably have surveillance on the phone too.
If you use it, they will prepare a dossier on you.
Cheney is probably funing and trying to find out how he can shut it down. They're so darn paranoid!
I think this is a great plan. Good job Nick!
Very nice, starofthesea; thank you!
This is an excellent new form of protest. Talk to the enemy! They're right on the other end of the line.
Ask them how their kids are doing in school, what they plan to do for the weekend, and whether the Koran's version of Cain killing his brother is any different from the Bible's version.
Is there a link to a web page for anyone else who wants to organize such a phone line?
Current evidence supports the idea that we all came from a tribe of just a few thousand people in East Africa a couple of hundred thousand years ago.
Except Bush; Bush was pieced together from body parts secretly collected from various sources and animated with electricity.
The fascist war profiteering bastards who are in charge of the U.S. government don't want friendly relations with a country they can steal oil or other resources from. They want WAR!
It was just 2 months ago and I was online with an Iranian student site. I have searched every damn thing I use to find something. Everything is a Gathering of Eagles type site pretending to be Iranian then it takes you to some right wing freaky sick shit anti-Islam, anti-ME, everything is gone that was easily found just a few months ago. This thought police garbage has us all paranoid. I am still thinking if they, whomever they are, find the site on my hard drive, this is absurd.
I feel like because my husband is Turkish and a Muslim, my youngest is Muslim, we have a house, over there or even Europe, house=apt, on the Agean. We have family in Istanbul, Bursa, Izmir all over and we travel back and forth frequently, calls are numerous daily, emails, also. Turkey is our "ally", still PKK again, Abdullah Gul is prez., Reycep Erdogun is PM, so no problem. Gul has about as much power as Ahmadinejad.
I am freaked out now, they are trappimg emails, tapping phones. Where do we live again?
Pacplyer, agree with your comments but not your opening line
"Big Government = Big Corporations"
It doesn't have to. It can mean social services, public healthcare, and good paying government jobs, instead of outsourced government where the employees make peanuts, and the corporation that delivers the service makes a killing.
It is important to realize that the role of government must include "taking care of all members the tribe". The tribe in the US is now 300 million people. If you leave it to charities to look after people (ie religious, or other community charities), they will exclude groups they find it difficult (for whatever reason) to include in "their" community. Big(gish) government is the price of civilization, and so are high(ish) taxes.
Big government does not necessarily mean big corp.
Small government is more likely to leave things to the fat cat corporations.
Good work.
28 years ago Roy Tuckman and Elliot Minsk got sick of a caller to their late night radio talk show, and told the caller that he was going to pay for a telephone call to the Iran "students" at the "American Embassy" in Tehran. On the second dialing attempt, the operator connected them live to English and Farsi "students.
http://www.audioport.org/index.php?op=program-info&program_id=5961&nav=&
I happened to be listening while working in my home machine shop late at night.
Curiously, according to an article "below the fold" on the front page of the Los Angeles Times the day after Reagan's inauguration, all the "students" were killed in a friendly-fire artillery barrage after they had volunteered for the Iraq-Iran war.
I'm sure the NSC is listening in, ready to hand over the files to Mukasey for prosecution. They'll claim people are "speaking in code'" as they did in the Padilla trial, when they talk about the weather and what they had for dinner. They really need some cases to make it appear that all of this spying and abrogation of constitutional rights is accomplishing something.
Silly activists - talkin's for hippies:
"...US Air Force is rushing to upgrade hangar facilities on the island (Mauritius) so that stealth bombers can carry 14-ton "bunker busting" bombs in an attack on Iran."
We're sorry, but the Iranian number "activists" are trying to reach has been annihilated for the safety of the children.
I love this! The common sense and supreme decency of the citizens of the world!
"The number you reached is temporarily out of order; please stay on the line and you will be connected with an NSA operator."
It's too bad the Iranians don't have a hockey team. Playing the Russians was how a lot of Canadians managed to protect ourselves from absorbing too much US commie paranoia during the Cold War.
Citizen-to-citizen diplomacy would seem to have the potential to snowball and force policy changes, where and if it could be initiated between real people w/o successful thwarts by governments.
We all know that corrupt/Undemocratic gov power brokers (e.g.: USA's Iran's 'Leaders') create officially defined Enemies of the State to keep their respective powers intact and citizens bamboozled.
Iranian Mullahs, wanting to keep fundamentalist-religious control over that country, against popular will, need The Great Satan USA as distracting bogeyman. Ditto: US military-industrial complex moguls, wanting to keep control over Pentagon funding and foreign policy, need Commies, Terrorists, Iranian Mullahs, etc. to validate The (profit-generating) Threat.
But is it sensible to suppose that a majority of normal human individuals in both countries [and all other countries] don't want perpetual tension, strife? -- given the age-old human proclivity for stupidity, tribal hypnosis, and violence? Maybe not. Not yet, anyway.
But where and how do we, who believe in human social evolution, begin to change this?
One thing does seem certain: What all corrupt 'Leaders' fear, especially in this new age of mass personal communication, is that average citizens might start talking directly to each other in large numbers -- only to discover and verify the fact that they have more in common with each other, as humans with similar needs, than they do with their respectively/perpetually corrupt governments.
The more that this provable fact is shared between manipulated peoples everywhere, the harder [presumably] it will be for those corrupt governments to control their citizens' demands for reform.
Given human nature, people-to-people diplomacy is no magic bullet yet; but it is a radically new and hopeful possibility, enabled by a technology that's inherently difficult for tyrants to control. Whether this virtuous potential can actualize and 'snowball,' remains to be seen.
Thanks to whomever above posted the web address to Iran. More energy should be put by all of us, in this direction.
2 cents,
I used to believe in a social safety net like you do. The trouble is that any big stash of cash like Social Security or an Employee Pension Plan suffers from is that it is a 24hr a day/365 day a year Target for corporate and government criminals to loot.
No one in the mainstream media has ever mentioned the fact that Social Security is right now running a SURPLUS (meaning it takes in more in withheld income taxes than it doles out in benefits.) Granted, that's going to change when the baby boomers all retire at the same time.
Bush and the NeoCONs are, in my opinion, intentionally bankrupting the U.S. Treasury now buy spending trillions on war pork (much of it on black programs like B2's, B3 bombers, Space Shuttle replacement, missle systems;; that DO NOT show up in the federal budget.)
Why?
Besides becoming personal Billionaires with the unaccounted (nine billion missing and unacounted for in Iraq?) To target and eliminate the so-called "Onerous Entitlements" [read: payments to poor people.]
I had a friend who worked in Sacramento for a lobbist during Ronald Reagan's Governorship, and he claimed that it was well known that Reagan often remarked that: "Poor People have no phucking reason to Live."
These attitudes formed the foundation of the "Morning in America" government cuts that actually did slow the size of the federal government. Unfortunately for everybody, that has mutated into the FrankenBush policy of growing the size and spending of the Federal Government to record percentage proportions. But the huge fed is no longer used for helping people in distress, e.g. Katrina and Florida FEMA failures & FEMA's new role of building 800 federal prisons for future "unrest." It is used as a big stick for big corporations to have their way "foriegn and domestic."
But what should be obvious to everybody is that unaccountable corporations are assuming more and more federal duties; e.g. All U.S. Airmail is now no-bid flown by the largest private courier company in the U.S; 49% of war duties in Iraq are carried out by private security companies.... FDA lets companies do their own testing on food and drug products and submit side effects on the honor system etc, etc.
What is the point of having a large, overbearing federal government if it never does it's job? Is the loss of the Bill of Rights worth the suppos-ed increase in Security in the face of runious spending on pork?
I think it is not.
We should all re-read the arguments of the federalist papers and the anti-federalist's arguments upon which this nation and this government were founded.
I promise if you go to the trouble to do it, you will be shocked how relevant it is to our problems right now.
Cheers,
pac