Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- A Culture That Condones The Killing Of Children And Teaches Children To Kill
- Slaughter in Connecticut: 20 Children, 6 Adults Dead in Kindergarten Massacre
- How the Mighty (Mississippi) Has Fallen: Historic Drought Plagues US
- Robots and Robber Barons
- The PSY Scandal: Singing about Killing People v. Constantly Doing It
- A Culture That Condones The Killing Of Children And Teaches Children To Kill
- 'I'd Rather Fight Like Hell': Naomi Klein's Fierce New Resolve to Fight for Climate Justice
- Save the Children: Tears and Tragedy in Connecticut
- Thinking the Unthinkable: On Mental Health, My Son, and Gun Violence
- Study: World's Mighty Giants Dying off at Alarming Rate
Popular content
Today's Top News
A Beautiful Corpse: Sixteen Sure Signs That the Regressive Right Is Over
Lordy, lord, it's been a mean season, hasn't it? And a long one, too.
We human beings (those bipeds lucky enough not to have been born a conservative or killed by one, that is) have suffered through the endless depravity, stupidity, duplicity and incompetence of the radical right for what now seems like forever. It's been awful, and it's been depressing, and that's putting it mildly. To have had even a fraction of a heart this last decade means to have lived in Hell.
Finally, though, the end is nigh. The signs are all there. The regressive right is cracking up, a complete and utter victim of its own success at winning power and of its own absolute failure in wielding it.
The markers are everywhere, bubbling just below the surface. Here are sixteen of them, sure signs if ever there were that the era of destructive government is (nearly) over:
* Follow the money: If you know anything about how American politics has been played over the last century, you know that the concept of Democrats out-fundraising Republicans is about as likely as likely as George W. Bush getting an honorary degree from anybody besides Bob Jones U. It could happen, to be sure (especially in some freaky parallel universe), it's just that it just ain't very likely. But guess what? It's happening now, and it's a sure sign of the regressive apocalypse (where do I order tickets for that party?). What is even more telling than empty GOP coffers is that even the big corporate money is going to Democrats. Imagine Enron contributing to Al Gore's campaign, and you'd just about have the picture. Is it possible that the healthcare industry had a recent change of heart and decided that guaranteed national healthcare is now more important than corporate profits, after all? It would be possible (though massively improbable), if they had ever had a heart to begin with. A much more plausible explanation is that the lobbyists for these fat-cats who are paid to sniff out power can see which way the wind is blowing, and that it ain't to the east anymore, ladies and gentlemen. Even the finance, insurance and real estate industries are funneling more money to Democrats than to the Reprobatlicans. (Talk about your truly bizarro parallel universes! This is the stuff of science fiction novels.) House Democrats have $28 million in the bank right now, while the GOP has $1.6 million for its congressional races (no, that's not a typo). When did that ever happen?
* Keep following the money: Has there ever been an economy this precarious for this long without throwing a rod or seizing an engine? Given how reviled Bush and his clones already are now, can you imagine how sour the public mood will be if there is a recession or worse in the coming year? When you start seeing stories about roving gangs of furious soccer moms beating up random Republicans caught without their Blackwater guards on K Street, you'll know why. Just watch the American flag pins start flying off of lapels. Stay tuned for more on this one. Gasoline is now selling for five bucks a gallon in parts of California, and that was being headlined by the Drudge Report, that bastion of anti-regressive journalism. I smell a twenty-first century Whiskey Rebellion a-brewin'.
* Follow the leader: Everybody's talking about him on the presidential campaign trail. It's just that they all happen to be Democrats. Republicans desperately want to pretend that Bush never existed (though not as much as they will want to after another year of his follies). So much, in fact, that they don't even mention his name in their debates or on the stump. The New York Times just reported that Democrats mentioned the lil' Bush feller 47 times in their last debate. Republicans? Twice, with one being a critique by Ron Paul. And this is while they're campaigning for conservative, pro-Bush votes, mind you. Did you know that Ronald Reagan (or, more accurately, the myth of Ronald Reagan) was still alive and in the White House? Neither did I, but if you listen to these bozos for more than five minutes you could certainly walk away with that impression (not to mention tinnitus and a whopping good brain hemorrhage as well, but that's another matter). It's a sure sign that your movement is in deep trouble when you can't say the name of the sitting president who so completely exemplifies its principles, for fear that doing so will destroy your candidacy.
* Follow Tucker: Right out the door, in fact. Woo-freakin'-hoo. Was there ever an unctuous little bow-tied twit of a punky spoiled brat that you just wanted to slap silly more than Tucker Carlson? Well, guess what? His ratings are doing it for you. Seems that nobody is terribly interested anymore in what the young master debater has to say, and MSNBC is getting ready to pull the plug on him, bow-tie and all. Bummer, dude. Maybe you could become a liberal now! Or, hey, if you're looking for a job, maybe you could get Bush to appoint you as ambassador to Smarmiland?
* Follow Keith: The reason MSNBC is getting ready to untuck the wee Carlson is because they want to make room for what viewers are actually interested in, which is more progressive politics, like the regular savagings of the rabid right by Keith Doberman. Here comes Rosie O'Donnell into the line-up, with a show that could make Keith look like a nice puppy by comparison. Apparently, even Joe Scarborough - fingers and toes all in the wind - is talking like a liberal these days. What was that Dylan line about not needing to be a weatherman...? You could almost come to love the free market, after all, eh?
* Follow Jon: Stewart, that is. And Stephen Colbert. Every night, incessantly, they do what sometimes seems like the only rational thing imaginable given the inanities of regressive politics in our unfortunate time. They mock it mercilessly. The good news is that for many people, especially young folk, this is their sole source of news about current developments. Is that a pretty serious indicator of the tragic state of the American polity? You betcha. But it could be a lot worse. People could be getting their 'news' from Fox, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Times, or even CNN or NBC. I think a very serious argument can be made that you learn more about the real world we actually inhabit from Stewart and Colbert than from the more subtle comedy shows presented every day by the mainstream disinformation media in the guise of 'newscasts'. Brian Williams may be a more honest source of information than was Baghdad Bob, but not by much. Until The Nation becomes required reading and Democracy Now! the most watched news broadcast on television, Comedy Central may be the best alternative we've got.
* Follow the kids: Speaking of the young folk, they are becoming as scarce in the Republican Party as a good vowel in Kyrgyzstan. And why not? Who wants to be in the party that's wrecking your environment, spending your future earnings, killing your friends for lies and telling you who you can sleep with? (Hint: You can't sleep with anybody. Unless, of course, you're a television preacher or a blow-hard regressive politician, in which case you can sleep with everyone. And everything. Baaaah.) What a fun bunch to hang with, eh? The even better news is that there is pretty strong evidence that people tend to stick for life with the party affiliation they adopt when they're young. As in so many other ways, therefore, George W. Bush will be the gift that keeps on giving. Thirty years from now, when regressives are an extinct species visible only in dusty museum showcases, we may wonder why we weren't as happy as little clams at a mollusk orgy to have had the Bush Leaguer around, doing a better job than we ever could have of smashing his ideology to bits.
* Follow Dobson: Please. Somebody get this destructive demon of the religious right into the home for doddering Precambrians where he belongs. As it happens, he might be taking care of it himself. It seems that Ol' Jimmy is outraged that none of the Republican front-runners are as obsessed with controlling other peoples' sexuality as his custom bible tells him they should be. He is therefore threatening to run a third-party candidate, thus ripping asunder the GOP, in which case I might just be forced into believing in god, after all. (Even better would be if McCain also launches a desperate last-call shot at the presidency with his own independent bid after losing the GOP nomination. Splitting the Halloween set vote three ways is definitely my version of heaven on earth.) Meanwhile, all indications are that the entire religious right is in complete disarray (oh, so that's what they mean by "Hallelujah!"). Loads of its troops are disenchanted with politics, disenchanted with regressivism, disenchanted with the GOP candidates, and otherwise just generally reeking of betrayal, rage and a large dose of your garden-variety steroid-enhanced mass surliness. This does not a successful political movement make.
* Follow the polls: Which have been showing for a long time now that Americans are really pissed off about what has happened to their country, and in record numbers. That's not exactly what you wanna hear when you're an incumbent running for reelection, or trying to keep your party in power. It gets better yet, though. As Paul Krugman noted this week, political research is now showing that the American public is not just aimlessly angry, but is more liberal in its attitudes than it has been since the early 1960s. And the Baby Boomers haven't even retired yet! Something tells me that killing stem-cell research and gutting Social Security, coupled with homophobia, environmental destruction, reckless aggression abroad and bankruptcy at home are not going to be big vote-getters in the coming decades. Call me crazy, but I'm going to go ahead and make that wild prediction.
* Follow the rude dude: Giuliani's popularity in the GOP indicates that even those nuts have turned away, however reluctantly, from their own social conservatism. And now the nuttiest of them all, Pat Robertson, has just endorsed this nasty little Rottweiler with the sorta liberal social policies. There's really only one viable explanation for that. Sex-obsessed pseudo-Jesus regressivism is a completely spent force, and the Pat Robertsons of this world have only two remaining choices: They can either jump on the bandwagon of sheer hypocrisy (Remember Robertson's post-9/11 rant about the abortionists, and the lesbians, and the feminists, etc.? Remember how he once sued a certain mayor of New York City to block the latter's support for gay marriage?), or they can demonstrate their utter irrelevance. Ol' Pat has made his choice. He did both.
* Follow MoveOn: Sure, they're not perfect, but they may be the best thing happening on the left these days in terms of real work with a real chance of success. More importantly, they've already shown that they know how to play hardball, and now they're learning how to play sophisticated hardball. In many ways, they're copying the playbook that the right adopted in the decades since the Goldwater ocean liner had its encounter with the proverbial iceberg, bringing the GOP back to the drawing board. Regressives have been winning for so long in part because they've been fighting smart, and in part because nobody was fighting back. The Democrats, of course, are still doing neither. But they're not the only ones with fists. Look for the right to crumple like any schoolyard bully the minute somebody stands up to it, just as Move-On is now doing.
* Follow the retirements: Republican politicians are retiring in droves now. There are 14 so far who are quitting their House seats, including Ohio's Deborah Pryce, one of the top members of the GOP leadership. Who wants the pleasure of defending the Republican record in next year's election cycle, followed by a drubbing and an ignominious pink slip? Or, if you're lucky enough to survive the tsunami, a lonely gig kicking around in forgotten wilderness of the mega-minority?
* Follow the numbers: As if the gods weren't angry enough (perhaps at Robertson for backing the pro-gay rights Giuliani?), Republicans will have to defend twice the number of Senate seats up for election next year as will Democrats. That may seem like sheer coincidence, but there is actually a perverse irony here. This is the fruit of the GOP's pyrrhic victory in 2002, when they used the Iraq war vote and general security hysteria to pummel hapless Tom Daschle-like Democrats. Now those very seats are up again, only this time the chicken has since come home to roost, and it's an angry little fowl. That's some awfully nasty karma to be carrying on your ledger, man. You might call Election 2008 the Revenge of Max Cleland.
* Follow the conversions: Just as might be expected, Republicans are starting to change their party affiliations, even in places like Missouri and Kansas (really!). And, just as also might be expected, you're hearing the classic (and true) explanation for their move: "I didn't leave the Republican Party, the Republican Party left me". Sorry Ronnie Raygun, but what comes around... Watch for a whole lot more of this, especially after November 2008.
* Follow the food chain: They're eating their young now. Predictable, to be sure, but still so much fun to watch. Did you hear that five conservative authors - including one of the Swift Boat hatchet-men, no less - are now suing their publishing house, Regnery (did they actually mean to call it 'Degeneracy' but it just got by the spell-checkers somehow?), and its parent company, Eagle Publishing? It seems they're a little upset that Eagle "orchestrates and participates in a fraudulent, deceptively concealed and self dealing scheme to divert book sales away from retail outlets and to wholly owned subsidiary organizations within the Eagle conglomerate", and thus rip the authors off of royalties owed to them. No kidding - really? I'm sorry, guys, but just who exactly did you think you were dealing with here? Look in the mirror! You cut a deal with a conservative press to publish your fraud, deception and self-dealing and you expected them to treat you better than George Bush did when he gave the gift of freedom and democracy to the Iraqis? And what's up with your wanting fair treatment and fair pay for your labor? You guys are starting to sound like a bunch of whiney socialists, fer crissakes! And tort-reform-needing litigious ones, at that! This is America, Dudes. Your America. Get used to being scammed by people who are richer than you.
* Follow the fallow: The right's agenda is not only bankrupt of real policy ideas, but nowadays it's even bankrupt of effective red-herrings as well. Yesterday's tried-and-true tropes no longer have that old magic anymore. "Terrorism, terrorism, terrorism. Gays, gays, gays." Yawn, yawn, yawn. "Honey, have you seen the remote? I really need to change the channel. And what time are we supposed to pick up Johnny from Little League practice?" Ho. Hum. This show is over. Regressives would like to thank everyone in the audience for their participation. Unfortunately, neither your wallets nor your articles of clothing are available for return to you at this time...
If the signs of the looming conservative apocalypse get any clearer, even blind cave fish will be reading them. These guys are getting ready to crumble like a poppy seed muffin six days past its sell-by date.
It certainly couldn't happen to a nicer bunch, could it?
I hope they get every little thing that is coming to them.
Except, of course, their Regnery royalties.
David Michael Green is a professor of political science at Hofstra University in New York. He is delighted to receive readers' reactions to his articles (dmg@regressiveantidote.net), but regrets that time constraints do not always allow him to respond. More of his work can be found at his website, www.regressiveantidote.net.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

55 Comments so far
Show AllMeet the new boss
Same as the old boss
Don't get fooled again!
Keep following the money. The Dems will now serve the money just like the Republicans did until the Republicans can regroup and retake power.
Seen the Dems end the war yet?
Seen the Dems reverse the Bush tax cuts? (Or even try)
Seen the Dems repeal the Patriot Act? (Or even try)
You won't Because this is what the money wants. And the Dems are happy to serve the money as long as they get it flowing to them.
I believe that Green's analysis rings true. Someone posted in another thread here that the truth has a way of eventually working itself out. It's probably like a rule of nature or space that one can wear a disguise, wage war abroad to disguise hostility at home, etc. only for so long until one's actions override any rhetoric to the contrary.
That is, any lie must eventually become a victim of its own success.
I hope the country, however, is NOT diverted/captured/shunted into a shill opposition. But, rather, we land at a place where genuine and deep reform and modernization is possible.
I also hope it doesn't take a new Depression, WWIII, or massive unrest before we finally bottom out. There are worrisome indications that 1+ of these scenarios is on the horizon unless we can make genuine course adjustments in several regards.
CD isn't letting me edit my last message, I wanted to state,
"I hope the country, however, is NOT diverted/captured/shunted into a shill opposition.".
That is, if we land at the footsteps of the Dem enablers, it'll just be same old Rethugian Party with a different flavor of icing. Our economy, our national image, future of several of our industries (automotive and IT being two of them), science, etc. all depend on putting neocon/neoliberal policies well behind us.
If the radical right is on the wane, why is Giuliani polling so well in head to head matchups with the Democratic candidates?
There is now a Democratic legacy - they have not stood up and represented the people. I don't have the optimism this essay effuses. There should have been so many stands taken during this lame duck presidency that have not been taken. I'm with Cindy on this. I don't want more of the same for my children in future. Not going to follow the money, they're in leaky pirate ships with slave labor. No way.
I am in total agreement that the money establishment is dumping the Republicans because Bush has messed them up so badly that they are a bad bet.
The social conservatives are also dumping the Republicans and considering forming their own party because they are discontented with the Republican front runner.
In the end, these things have little bearing upon whether or not we will get a party in power that serves the interests of the majority of our people. The Democrats are a deeply confused party with many of them all too willing to serve the exact same interest groups as Republicans.
I didn't leave the Democratic party, the party left me. I remember when opposing torture and imperialism by the American government and supporting the Constitution and the rule of law used to be mainstream. Now it's on the left fringe.
David, thanks for the uplifting words!
I hope Mr. Green is right, but we should never forget the Reichstag fire. A good October surprise, say a dirty bomb planted by some crazy with ingredients supplied by some right wing mercenary company, could still change the tide toward fascism.
All good reasons to be cheerful---But we must not underestimate the viciousness of BushCo and all they might do yet to cripple even any hope of human progress in our lifetimes, as their legacy of complete contempt for the people who despise them; as cowards, bullies, dull-brained dinosaurs who somehow grew up feeling so wounded and impotent as to think the world owes them the world....When the USSR fell (and with it a shadow that had darkened the last generation, mine), the politically doomed GW Bush Senior took incredible pride in saying with a sweep of his hand, "There will be no peace dividend...."
Let's look at the Big Picture here, folks: The reason the Democrats will "follow the money" is because money is the driving force in our consumer culture.
If you want REAL change, stop buying a bunch of crap you don't need anyway. Live simply, drive less, grow a backyard garden, support local agriculture. Put on a jacket instead of cranking the heat, use your wood stove for heating water and cooking. Give certificates for favors and home-cooked dinners instead of stupid "made in China" garbage to put under the tree this year ... etc., etc.
The reason corporations (and corrupt "bought" polititians) have become so powerful is because we support them. Your shopping decisions are the "votes" that really count. Let's get off this destructive train called consumerism and live sustainably. The corporations will come BEGGING to us, and so will their puppet political candidates!
Great article but I would add that there is an employment track that exists throughout our government and that now includes lobbyists. Who better to maintain the status quo than a former elected official. So with enough recycling of these "good Germans" they can keep the game playing even when you don't need a weatherman.
Hoa binh
I think that Mr. Green has been smoking something or is being disengenuous.
Let's wait and see what happens to the remains of our once noble experiment in government - the Constitution.
Don't get your hopes up - the choices for leadership seem to be more of the same. In fact probably even more dangerous than the current team in office. The paymasters aren't changing, only the lickspittles representing them. The ones leaving have done the damage they were paid handsomely enough to do.
Just think - Giuliani vs. Clinton.
Middle America continues losing bigtime either way.
And that's only if we have an election. We seem to encourage suspension of constitutions when events don't go our way. It's just a short step to making that happen here.
Finally, though, the end is nigh. The signs are all there
the sounds of trumpets tuning. nature ending. dreamers dreaming.
"If the radical right is on the wane, why is Giuliani polling so well in head to head matchups with the Democratic candidates?"
Because the DLC still runs the Democratic Party and no matter how much their apologists say, voters hate evasive triangulators and love negative campaigns. The DLC gives the MurderStream Media the excuse they need to say "Well, the Democrats aren't talking about getting troops out or not going to war with Iran" -- by which they mean, Hillary isn't.
"Centrist" or "pragmatic" Democrats empower the Right the way that moderate Republicans used to help pull the Democrats toward the left.
I'm with Compashcat. Americans love to compete, so let's make downsizing competitive. Who can be the most ingenious at supplying their own energy? Whose house is the most flexible, habitable, comfortable - while taking up the smallest footprint?
I'm old enough to remember the time when a friend argued for woodstoves. Didn't stand a chance, I thought. Well, shame on me. I look at the environmental movement now with tremendous pride in all the young folks who were interested, learned, and left a legacy for the rest of us. Let's get on the bandwagon. Vote INDEPENDENT! Shop GREEN on the internet! Argue ISSUES, not personalities, etc. A new, refreshing, less hectic and more rewarding life style awaits us.
curmudgeon99,
There will be an election and Giuliani will win it by hook or crook. And it does not matter whether the Congress is Democratic because Giuliani will use some excuse, possibly a new attack (real or fabricated), to declare himself an all-powerful unitary executive. Then will come another war or two and, after he gets a fifth fascist on the Supreme Court, he will start passing laws by executive fiat, including privatizing Social Security and Medicare and selling off public lands. Wall Street wanted Bush to do those things, but found that a Democratic Congress could stop him. So they need a real authoritarian figure who has shown he is not afraid to bust heads to bring about "law and order."
And, once Giuliani has his balcony, forget about using the Internet to communicate or organize politically and forget about street demonstrations. People better even forget about using the telephone to transmit any message inconsistent with total submission.
It can happen here and it most likely will in the next few years.
Giuliani, Clinton, Gore, Bush, maybe.
A police state, lies, economic downfall, hypocricy, gulags in far away locals.
dreamers dreaming on dire possibilities are still dreamers at heart.
More Dylan: "It's a wonder we can even feed ourselves."-Idiot Wind
OPHELIA
Well, God 'ild you! They say the owl was a baker's
daughter. Lord, we know what we are, but know not
what we may be. God be at your table!
Open your heart and let them in - they are your brothers and sisters. They are our fellow country men and women.
They have been betrayed and burned, just as we have, by those we trusted.
We have more in common with the libertarian right, than we do with Hillary, or they do with Guliani.
United, United, United. Be humble and forgive do not gloat.
Now is the time to reach out, to save our country, we can fight over gay marriage another time.
If the two wings unite, and flap together, the body will follow. Phoenix from the ashes.
Ramsay
LOL :)
WTF:
Then maybe change your acronym to WTP "What's the Point"
A Green party hands the victory to Guliani, a libertarian party hands the victory to Clinton, either way the country loses.
The "right" is freaked out, over the loss of the constitution, just as progressives are.
There is common ground - someone needs to take the first step - the country watches and waits.
Ramsay
Compashcat & hereontheres,
Nice sentiments about getting Americans to be less materialistic. Would be nice if they spent more time involved in politics, reading, community service, etc. Would be nice if all politicians cared more about their constituents, than doing whatever it takes to get (re) elected. Hell, it would be nice if I became 20 years younger and got my hair back.
I suggest that our best chance at really turning around our decaying political system is public financing of all state and national campaigns. Not "reform" but full out public financing, including TV ads, consultants, the whole shooting match. Throw in some money for third parties (maybe tied to minimal voter thresholds) to keep things interesting.
Would corporations and fatcats still hold power? Sure, but not to the ridiculous unbalanced level that it is today. Although K-Street and the big power brokers would all be against it, I'm not so sure all the politicians would be very opposed. Incumbents would still have some advantages, and they wouldn't need to spend 50% of their time selling themselves to large contributors. If they get knocked down from their high horse (we'll see on that after 2008), even Republicans might begrudgingly go for it.
As long as I'm dreaming, after that would come the Fairness Doctrine and breaking up media oligopolies.
Hmmm, lets see, what have the Democratic majorities in both the House and Senate done this year?
Raised the minimum wage, which, raised the price of goods, which is a net effect of nothing.
Funded the war in Iraq
Allowed Bush to spy on Americans
Gave Bush the ability to declare himself dictator and impose martial law if he ever decides to declare a national emergency.
Confirmed Bush's nominee to replace Gonzales who thinks torture is ok.
So, what can we expect of even more Democrats in the House, Senate and probably the White House next year?
More of the same Bush policies.
The reason the money's going to the democrats is because the fix is already in.
And follow the creation of a "private" Christian army that's government financed, heavily armed, and is expanding it's "air force," "navy," and intelligence "departments." And follow the radical Christianizing of our Air Force and other military orgs.
The "regressive right" isn't over - they're regrouping for a much more serious push to turn America into JesusLand - by force. Anyone who figures it's time to relax is playing into their hands perfectly...
Ramsay,
"Open your heart and let them in - they are your brothers and sisters. They are our fellow country men and women.
They have been betrayed and burned, just as we have, by those we trusted.
We have more in common with the libertarian right, than we do with Hillary, or they do with Guliani."
'Why, man, they did make love to this employment.' -
The libertarian right reads the Constitution as a charter for Social Darwinism. They're mainly upset that there's any government beyond the military & police still operating. The enemy of my enemy is not my friend.
I think David is right on this one. And if I am right that he is right the Democratic Party could end up controlling the House, Senate and the White House. Pelosi, by not impeaching is setting them up for the fall. Of course the monsters Dick and Creepy let into the government may still have to be dealt with.
Dichterfreund:
When I was at the October 27 march in San Francisco, that was organized by the socialist ANSWER and UFPJ, I was shocked by the number of Ron Paul supporters in attendence.
Counterpunch, my other favorite website, which is to the left of this one - carries the following article today.
http://counterpunch.com/whitney11092007.html
I am not libertarian, I am not progressive, I am "American" - The Constitution of the United States of America defines who I am. Anyone who wants to defend the constitution is a friend of mine.
There exists an opportunity,I would agree very slim and a longshot, that we could put aside our differences and unite to prevent the complete facist corporate take-over of our country.
Love and Peace,
Ramsay
Alas, celebrating that the millions going to the Democratic candidates is something to be celebrated makes me even sadder. All that says to me, is the same folks that brought (bought) you BushCo, will now bring you Clinton? That's who they are putting their money on, and if any of us think that any Dem will take that much money and not deliver, well, think again. A change of players does not a change of policy make. Green does not say that the ultimate conclusion is a Democratic landslide, bu that seems to be what is being suggested. A truly progressive landslide is something to celebrate, but more of what characterizes the Democratic Party today, represents a fist in a glove, a slower slide toward a complete corporate takeover of our government, in other words, fascism.
In fact, anything short of a groundswell of candidiates commmitted to taking our government back, will have us posting this same old disappointment a year and a half from now. Dream bigger than that and act to make those dreams your reality.
Just remember, though, the Republicans still manufacture the voting machines that leave no trail.
Ramsay - You have some most excellent comments as a number of folks here have made.
I agree with the belief that the democrats are corrupted by the unwarranted influence of money flowing thru K street (that's where our military should be: Al quaeda = lobbyist). So Davids' assessment of the GOP may be correct but the democrats are corrupted by the same money.
Notice real campaign finance reform isn't anywhere on the horizon nor any legislation to make it illegal for former politicians to turn into high paid lobbyists.
Yes, Gene Therapy, we remember about the voting machines that can be rigged without much trace. That's why we liberals and progressives probably need a 60% win to squeak by on 51% "official" tally.
But that too can happen, and it should happen. The Repubs are not to be "misunderestimated", they are to be defeated by an overwhelming change of voter wisdom.
If you had been on the floor today and witnessed the disgraceful display by the Hispanic Caucus, you'd not be so quick to tout the end of the Republican devil.
These are all good and valid points (except for Rosie....I don't believe intelligent people watch her anymore)
In any case it looks as ifCongressional and Senatorial Dem's look as if they can't wait to hand momentum back to the Republicans. Racial pandering has to stop or we are going to lose big time in 08.
click power,,,and laugh at the bums, throw em out all of them get rid of electoral college while we're at it, not to mention socialize medicene, houseing and insurence, these idiots surely arenot investing in America, and if they are it is the very few who benefit....1%,,,,and finally VOTE OUT THE National debt, start a class war quit paying your mortgadge,,,your mortality gage, how long you live how long you can pay,,,,pay and pay, revolution is at your fingertips, run up your credit cards, home equities and whatever else and quit paying, and see em SQUEAL, you'll know how the PIGGIES are,,,,making it a Land -LORD sociaty,,,,pay pay pay, STOP!!!and here 'em SQUEAL, remember CHRY^SLER Bailout, REmember 3rd world bailout,(when Castro suggested a Debtors Cartel,,you could have heard a pin drop on Wall (piggie) Street) How about the PEOPLE Bailout...oh JUBileeeeee.
Yeah don't get all excited about something good might happen. If it ever does I'm sure we'll notice. Right now we are looking at our worst nightmare- Giuliani, the only person on the planet worse than the duet now in the white house- is spose to be running against Hillary, and maybe winning. don't uncork the champagne just yet mr. Green
I for one would welcome a few years without war, and an economic recovery. We had both with our last Democratic President. And we could use a little environmental protection.
Those seduced by the Libertarian stylings of Ron Paul will get what they deserve - nothing. He is right on the war, but for the wrong reasons. The end doesn't justify the means. ever.
How does this buffoon get published anywhere except on WetDreams? The Corporatocracy finally got to somebody at CommonNightmares with a big slippery wad of cash to print this tripe. Fuck em, I'm going to Buzz Flash. At least their shit is usually via a link.
The underlying assumption, that the Democrats are not part of the regressive right, is palpably false. Bush is still bombing, torturing, rewarding war-profiteer cronies and lying through his teeth with the majority support of the Democratically controlled congress. Hillary Clinton, the frontrunner, is neocon lite, a Joe Lieberman in drag (if the senatorial voting record doesn't convince you, maybe the coiffure will). All of the plausible Republican nominees are endorsing Bush's policies. The neocon body politic may be stinking to high heaven and bloated with hot air, but it's definitely not dead.
This should be "Sixteen Sure Signs That My Career As a Writer Is Over." So now Democrats out-fundraising Repugs is a sign of 'progressives' winning, oh my that hit the funny bone.
Democrats raising more money is a sign of the elite choosing team B after team A screwed up big time. The charade must go on with different players now.
The right-wing has never been more powerful. The fact that Pelosi and Reid have the majority and won't move a finger on the war, on impeachment, gas price gauging and the outsourcing of our jobs is definite proof that the elite is winning BIG.
Olbermann is the only 'progressive' voice on prime time, among 20 conservatives, what weed is this Green guy smoking? And Olbermann always ends up looking the other way when he should be destroying Democrats with the same vigor. He sells the false idea that Democrats are the good guys. This is not being progressive, this is being dishonest.
Don't underestimate the effect of the WGA strike darkening The Daily Show and the Colbert Report. I'd not be surprised if the producers were hardballing it to keep those shows off the air during the election year, at least in part.
David Green paints a rosy picture that would certainly be helpful if it happens as he has portrayed it. However, after watching the right-wingers operate with a madman and a monster in control it may not be so easy. There will be plenty of time to have a convenient terrorist threat come along or some country may just get provoked into starting a conflict that could throw everything into a stew and the American people will need strong leaders to defend them from destruction. If none of that works, the voting, non voting, and screwed up voting machines will do their job. The last resort will always be the fair and balanced Justice dept and Supremes who have come in so handy in previous times. Dreaming is good, but it is also good to wake up and smell the coffee.
Follow the Money!
Follow the Leader!
Mike Gravel '08
www.gravel2008.us/legislature
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PY1NrY6ismM
Although almost 60 I still remember what my grandmother said when I was a young boy. She sad, "The wheel just goes 'round & 'round." It was in a conversation about fashions coming & going, then coming back again, but applies to politics as well. My good investment broker friend speaks of the same thing, but instead of a wheel he talks about cycles. Everything is just points on a roller-coaster ride graph.
The wealthy try to insulate themselves from desruction by constantly grabbing for more & more, but we all know someone who accumulates millions (or bilions) never goes broke. A good example is Ted Turner, who lost about 80% of his 'pie' but still is worth about a billion and a half or so. Less wealthy doesn't equate with poverty by any means, but more wealthy doesn't equate with happiness either. The poor will always struggle to 'get', while the rich will always fight to 'keep'. It's the nature of the beast. The beast, for our survival as a species, must be brought to ground though.
For the richest 1% to continualy increase their holdings, when 3 billion people on this planet exist on less than $2 per day, is unconscionable. Unfortunately, the 'haves' will continually back the haves (Schumer & Feinstein backing Mulkasey, Bush veto of SCHIP), not giving any heed to the desires of the 'have nots', viewing them only as sub-human less intelligent fodder to enslave, exploit, or send as cannon-fodder, while they finance both side of the conflict. The strategy is world domination at any cost (even world depopulation of 2 bilion people), and their tactics are:
The opposing sides were to be armed and incidents were to be provided in order for them to:
1) fight amongst themselves;
2) destroy national governments;
3) destroy religious institutions;
4) and eventually destroy each other.
The aim is to have us divided and the means are through:
1) Religion
2) Race
3) Class
4) Politics
5) Controlled Media
Yep, the cycle continues.
The dems will be made to look like the saviors of the Constitution and our democratic rights, at least here in the US, while continuing to let right-wing nuts have their way on foreign policy.
But don't expect them to save the constitution all in one season. They have years to sit back and waste their time with it. Besides, they have to also provide some kind of backdoor for their right-wing counterparts, so that they don't get completely axed by the public and the corporate machine.
The ruling-class duopoly of repugs and dems are like the ying and yang of ruling-class corporate politics. This is all by design, to prevent real progress and reforms from occurring.
The ruling-class likes things the way they are, with their fat families hording all the wealth and power, and they want to keep it that way. So they have devised a method in which they permit the right-wing nuts to start wars and bring the constitution to its knees, after which they can pretend to take sides with the antiwar left and move on to act like the saviors of the constitution.
They do this thing every decade or two as a means of preventing real progress and reformative change, because they like things just as they are and don't want no major changes.
There can be no real future aside from more of the same BS because that's the way they want it and they are the ones at the bridge controls.
The Nazis made their move when they were fading politically -- the Reichstag fire -- set by a "mentally ill Dutch Communist." Stay tuned for more fun and games from Richard "Reichstag" Cheney.
The 911 Press for Truth (www.911pressfortruth.com) video needs to be aired nationally on cable TV. God bless Free Speech TV (www.freespeech.org) for airing it -- repeatedly.
I appreciate anyone making me smile and laugh these days, so thanks David. However, my worry is about the recent local elections in Massachusetts. The turn out was smaller then ever. I wonder if millions of low and middle income voters will stay home because they always thought their vote did't really make a difference. The past few years have done little to dispell that notion. Will they stay home or work a few extra hours to buy heating oil and mumble about B.S. Democracy? Even if they vote, we end up with more of the same, corporate owned pols. I don't think many people believe we can bring the corporation down. Thanks for the smile, but I'm still worried.
The problem is that what a large number of Americans hold most dear are not singular/symbolic/monolithic things. But the myriad diversions: iPods, movies, beer, music, food, etc. If Cheney or his Bilderbergers (or whoever they are) want to pull off another stunt to REALLY get Americans fired up, I've wondered whether they'll orchestrate a "terrorist" attack on the iPod manufacturing facility. Or perhaps claim that Iran is poisoning all microbrews across the nation.
Take away our rights, our freedom and privacy, our real estate equity, ream us financially, wage open class warfare against the middle- and working-class, bring us to war on false pretense, set up fake opposition in the Democratic Party. He can do all of these things, but if our movies, iPods and beer are taken away, we'll fight to the ends of the earth to regain them.
Seriously folks, the "getting Americans onboard" is not a prerequisite to their plans, I'll wager. They'll go ahead and execute them anyway, popular support or not. This isn't exactly a healthy democracy any more.
I suspect that the act of voting has descended to this: it has little or nothing to do with changing course of government. It's just an indicator for the strength of the sales/con job they need to pull on Americans after the election in order to do what they're going to do anyway.
"Hey, hey, LBJ! How many kids did you kill today?"
The democrats don't exactly have a history of pacifism, restraint from meddling abroad, or only fighting wars of absolute necessity. But they are not neocons with the lunatic PNAC agenda of reforming the world to their perception of American values using propaganda, coercion, illegal activities, and military aggression.
I can't say why Hillary and Nancy do or don't do what they should regarding war and impeachment. Its probably their "get elected first" strategy, and chances are they will run the government in a businesslike manner, put a stop to the unconstituional and reprehensible tacitcs now in use, and eventually disengage from Iraq and Iran using the advice of our professional diplomatic, military and intelligence corps.
The neocons are grooming Giuliani to be their next front man (and they are trying to buy Hillary as a fallback strategy). Disaffected Republicans and Democrats of all stripes have to "hold their noses and vote for Hillary". We can take no chances on a close vote. The neofascists have to go, and the Republicans have to purge them from their party.