Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- Street Artist Charged with 56 Counts for Punking NYPD with Drone Poster
- For Pete's Sake, What's Happened to Our Democracy?
- A Sign That Obama Will Repeat Economic Mistakes
- Obamacare Architect Leaves White House for Pharmaceutical Industry Job
- Fears Confirmed: Domestic Drones 'Fly Regularly' in US Airspace
Popular content
Today's Top News
Driving the Masses Mad
It's official: Bush Derangement Syndrome is now a full-blown epidemic. George W. Bush apparently has reduced more of his fellow citizens to frustrated, sputtering rage than any other president since opinion polling began, with the possible exception of Richard Nixon.
That should be a pretty good indicator of where Bush will rank when historians get their hands on his shameful record-in the cellar, alongside the only president who ever had to resign in disgrace.
A new Gallup Poll released this week showed that 64 percent of Americans disapprove of how the Decider is doing his job. That sounds bad enough-nearly two-thirds of the country thinks its leader is incompetent. But when you look more closely at the numbers, you see that Bush's abysmal report card-only 31 percent of respondents approve of the job he's doing-actually overstates our regard for his performance.
According to Gallup, if you lump together the Americans who "strongly" approve of Bush as president with those who only "moderately" feel one way or the other about him, you end up with about half the population. That leaves a full 50 percent who "strongly disapprove" of Bush-as high a level of intense repudiation as Gallup has ever seen in its decades of polling.
Gallup has been asking the "strongly disapprove" question since the Lyndon Johnson administration. The only time the polling firm has measured such strong give-this-guy-the-hook sentiment was in February 1974, at the height of the Watergate scandal, when Nixon's "strongly disapprove" number was measured at 48 percent. Bush beats him by a nose, but the margin of error makes the contest for "Most Reviled President, Modern Era" a statistical tie.
The Gallup Poll found that among Bush's shrinking Republican base, he has unusually strong support. Independents, though, have joined Democrats in the Bush Derangement Syndrome clinic: They, too, "strongly disapprove" of the job the president is doing.
Bush didn't come by this distinction with help from family connections or the Supreme Court. No, he earned it.
Look at the situation Bush's successor will inherit. Throughout much of the world, the United States is seen as an arrogant bully whose rhetoric about freedom and the rule of law is disgracefully empty. The lawyers and students who are being tear-gassed in the streets of Pakistan's cities will long remember that when push came to shove, Bush chose to stick with a cooperative dictator, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, rather than live up to his words about the universal value of democracy.
The next president will be left with more than 100,000 U.S. troops still bogged down in Iraq, with an unfinished war in Afghanistan-and, between those two crises, a strengthened and emboldened Iran that hopes to dominate the world's most dangerous region. Nice work.
Bush's successor will, incredibly, assume control of a United States government that interrogates terrorist suspects with "enhanced" techniques known throughout the world by a much simpler term: torture. The new commander in chief will almost surely take custody of hundreds of people detained without formal charges, on questionable evidence, and held for years in secret CIA prisons or at Guantanamo. The next president will take over a government that claims the right to eavesdrop on U.S. citizens without meaningful judicial oversight.
Whoever takes office in January 2009 will be left with a more polarized economy-an America where the rich have been made richer during the last six years with generous tax cuts, while 40 million people struggle without health insurance. The new president will be left with a government that not only failed miserably in its response to the most extensive natural disaster the nation has ever faced, but also reneged on Bush's pledge to build a better New Orleans-and make it possible for all those who lived in the city to return.
The next occupant of the White House will find the nation's coffers depleted by Bush's wars-the price tag doubtless will have reached $1 trillion by Inauguration Day-and by whatever it eventually costs to keep the housing market afloat.
He or she will inherit, in short, a dismal mess. It will take most of the new president's first term to begin to set things right.
It's easy to understand why Americans have come to think of George W. Bush as the worst president in memory, perhaps one of the worst ever. What's hard to fathom is how we'll make it through the next 14½ months. But who's counting.
© 2007, Washington Post Writers Group
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

17 Comments so far
Show AllFor some insights on the income divide and what the upper crust does to earn its pay these days, see the recent debate via responses to a letter issued by Walmart, warning attorneys that fees of $1,000/hour and $160,000/year for new associates are excessive, at:
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/11/02/wal-mart-strikes-back-at-associate-salary-increases/
Think these people worry about Bush? How DARE Walmart exercise its monopsony power over attorneys! What's next, outsourced legal services?
The large number of detailed responses to the letter from all sorts of attorneys provides a rare glimpse into how the upper class views itself, its worth, its "productivity", the "competitive" market within which it functions, what's "fair", what's stupid and wasteful, what's cheating and stealing, what's expected and deserved, etc.
As one comment points out, many attorneys are well aware that most days are about reading, reviewing, responding and filing comments - then repeat as necessary to run the billing hours up to a full days pay.
But never fear, digging holes and filling them up again shows up as added value in the GNP.
As William Shakespeare said, "The first thing we do is kill all the lawyers".
Ha! Like you mentioned, don't get me started......
The masses need to get mad and then get active, that is the only way change will happen.
Here's some activating inspiration from Van Jones
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoCVP7sRq_8
Unless things change drastically the next president will continue merrily where Bush has left off. Bush is dead, long live the Bush! And the Surrendercrats will be there to help him/her.
I hope everyone here has logged onto wwww.vote.org The Kleptocracy isn't going to give us back our country, we will have to take it back. And it won't be easy now that they have control of the three branches of government, the fourth estate and all our money.
You can change the King but you don't change the kingdom. We've got a corrupt political system and a criminal corporate institution. Not much chance for change from within. For those who think we still have two political parties it's time to wake up. We have only the Uncle Buck Party. It's made up of our D.C. politicians and their enabling lobbyists, and our nations CEOs. With the mainstream media as their PR Department we have little chance of escaping Uncle Buck's IRON HEEL. Our Constitution is being destroyed along with our labor unions. But Britney's doing OK, and there is an undefeated team in the NFL, and OJ will go on trial again, and TVs are getting bigger. Ba Ba Ba
Hoa binh
Hoa binh
"Look at the situation Bush's successor will inherit."
Assuming there is a successor. Based on Cheneybush's continued support of the dictator of Pakistan and his "emergency" rule and mass arrests of lawyers and protesters and Bhutto and his suspension of elections due to said "emergency," one might suggest we're watching a dry run of our near future.
Illegal bombing of Iran followed by the expected bloody retaliation will "legally" permit Cheneybush to declare an "emergency situation" and... well, you know the rest.
Bush is doing what the right expects him to do, which is to drive the government into such deep debt that only the corporate sector can provide the nation's needs. Everything is being privatized.
Gene Therapy----and they are well on their way to privitization, and all with the complicity of the so-called opposition party. Where was the hue and cry? Not a whimper.
You ain't seen nothin yet. It's gonna get worse before it gets better, I'm afraid.
"...perhaps one of the worst (presidents) ever." Why does even Eugene Robinson balk at stating the bald truth: Bush IS the worst president ever, by such a wide margin that it is difficult to fathom. He took a country that dominated the world economically and culturally and in seven short years has set in on course for a catastrophic economic and societal crash.
Otherwise sensible pundits such as Eugene need to stop pulling their punches.
Yada, Yada, Yada
All talk & bluster.
In the meantime, planes being loaded with missiles and bombs, Target coordinates in the command systems are being verified, 'common folk' are wringing our hands.
We are becoming slaves in all but name and in thrall to the moneyed fascist corporate oligarchy. As of now, we do not control our destinies.
If we do not stop this madness all the blood and terror unleashed will be on our individual heads.
We as citizens are dirctly culpable for turning a blind eye to the transgressions of this group of thieves/madmen/tyrants when there was still time to prevent their takeover of the power structures(including the Pentagon,Justice Dept, Homeland Security,etc.)
I feel stupid for making the following suggestion AGAIN, but I feel it is a possible tactic - but I could be wrong.
The average citizen is distracted from the consequences of our upcoming attacks using Darth Vader-like tactics to initiate an Armageddon, the likes of which we may not survive. The very UnConstitutional acts carried out by our elected (and unelected) leaders of all persuasions is beyond any comprehension and morally dumbfounding.
Americans need to demonstrate their utter disgust with these policies of aggression and thirst for power and complete control of the world.
It has happened here - to paraphrase Sinclair Lewis.
Until the US populace gets the courage to take to the streets and follow the example of Gandhi's non-violent marches and demonstrations nothing will change. The people have got to WANT the Constitution restored enough to ACT accordingly. If there is no such desire, there will will be no more US Constitution (except in name only).
Things will change only when the majority of the populace is alienated and hopeless. I think the time is close.
Then they may :
STAND UP - for what they beleive to be right.
SIT DOWN - in the nearest street to bring transportaion, retail, everything to a standstill.
FIGHT - I hope like Gandhi's Pathan friend Badshar Khan(Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan) (check him out)a Pashtun nonviolent Muslim
FIGHT - Even if it means sacrifice to themselves to totally repudiate the oligarchy
FIGHT - As if their lives depend on active resistance - which they do
When people realize that they cannot ignore the actions of the government and relaize they themselves are the governmet, only then is change possible.
What a shame to let cowardice bring down such a noble experiment of human governance!!
Here are some comments by a man who stood by Gandhi - Badshah Khan, who led a 100,000 person army of non-violent Pashtuns from the Khyber pass region. He was a Pashtun (Afghan) political and spiritual leader known for his non-violent opposition to British Rule during the final years of the Empire on the Indian sub-continent. He was a lifelong pacifist and a devout Muslim. He was known as Badshah Khan (sometimes written as Bacha Khan), the `King of Chiefs', and `Frontier Gandhi'.
"To me nonviolence has come to represent a panacea for all the evils that surround my people. Therefore I am devoting all my energies toward the establishment of a society that would be based on its principles of truth and peace." –
Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan
"Today's world is traveling in some strange direction. You see that the world is going toward destruction and violence. And the specialty of violence is to create hatred among people and to create fear. I am a believer in nonviolence and I say that no peace or tranquility will descend upon the people of the world until nonviolence is practiced, because nonviolence is love and it stirs courage in people." – Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan to an interviewer in 1985
His story is contained in 'Nonviolent Soldier of Islam: Badshah Khan, A Man To Match His Mountains', by Eknath Easwaran (Published by Nilgiri Press).
Also see NPR highlights:
http://www.npr.org/programs/musings/2003/jan/khan.html?sc=emaf
Get impeachment moving forward. Pressure your Congressperson.
Pressure House Speaker Pelosi. Write to her that you are sending money to Cindy Sheehan because Ms. Pelosi won't move impeachment forward. If you're a Democrat, write that you're leaving the party because of Ms. Pelosi.
If Cheney is being impeached then certain allies who are bat-shit crazy and want to attack someone and have us protect them will wait before starting something.
If Cheney is being impeached then his finger won't be near the button.
Impeach Cheney and save the world.
Can't somebody gong this administration already???
Bush long ago passed the worst president in our history test. Now he is in the race for the worst leader anywhere contest. The strife in Pakistan could well be what our country could face eventually since Congress allowed the rule of law to be suspended and a theocratic dictator given free rein to do as he likes with immunity for himself and his cronies. Bring the boys back from that hellhole over there---we need them here to help keep order in our own country if need be.
Politics is not serious until there is a body count. Refer to 1963-1968: JFK RFK MLK killed, George Wallace shot.
Willybill, please explain what you have in mind. How does a state do a recall, get a referendum on a ballot and elect a new goveror like they did in California. How does a state get a referendum on a ballot to impeach Bush/Cheney? Could it be a nation wide referendum? Congress isn't going to do it, but could the voters do it? There must be a legal way to do it.
"There must be a legal way to do it."
The only way I can see is to put the brakes on the money making machine. Only then will the fat cats concede even a millimeter.
We were supposed to have had a national strike on Election Day. Did that happen? If it did, it wasn't reported. I don't think much happened.
Until people get so fed up they're willing to put themselves out there in a serious manner, we'll be faced with leadership by corporations, money being conflated with speech, and people like me who just bitch about things but do little else.