Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Congress' Majority Wimps
A year ago today, this newspaper published a column under the headline "Say It Loud: I'm a Democrat and I'm Proud."
That veiled homage to James Brown came a few days after the the 2006 midterm elections.
"There's nothing like a closely fought election to restore one's faith in democracy," the columnist wrote, intoxicated by the promise of the moment. "After too many years on the outside looking in, I feel as if I have my country back."
Karl Rove, the man who engineered two terms for the inattentive and feckless president, finally had egg on his face.
All week, the man the media dubbed "Bush's Brain" boasted of secret polling data that had the Republicans holding on to both chambers of Congress.
It was an outrageous lie, of course, but it would have only been slightly less plausible if Mr. Rove had included the geneology of the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus for good measure.
Stunned by the scale of his party's rejection at the polls, Mr. Bush publicly needled Karl Rove about being "too distracted" by extracurricular reading to pay attention to the details of a reality-based election. Things were looking ugly for the GOP.
Still, the administration's surrogates at Fox News and in the blogosphere tried to spin a historic rout into something far less significant than the Gingrich revolution a decade earlier.
But even nostalgic nonsense couldn't obscure the fact that the Iraq war had finally become Mr. Bush's electoral Waterloo.
Americans were tired of a pointless war that consumed so much of our national treasure and took so many lives on both sides. Five years after 9/11, we were finally looking beyond the fear that had begun to undermine our democratic institutions.
Because the Democrats promised an endgame to a war Mr. Bush started, the American people gave what had become a perennial opposition party a slim majority in the U.S. Congress.
Last November, Americans of all persuasions looked forward to Rep. Nancy Pelosi becoming speaker of the House in January 2007. Our weariness and expectation was that deep.
And while no one was particularly excited about Harry Reid becoming Senate majority leader, there was an expectation that even with uninspired leadership at the top, dramatic changes in the conduct and duration of the war were months away.
We have a lame-duck president with a lower approval rating than Richard Nixon in 1974. Who could have imagined that he would still hold all the cards in 2007, with no end to the war in sight?
The three top Democratic presidential candidates aren't even prepared to commit to pulling American soldiers out of Iraq before 2013. Last year, after the Democrats took Congress, who would have expected the party's standard-bearers to become so craven?
If someone had said a year ago that Americans would still be tolerating two wars with an estimated price tag of $2 trillion and no good outcome guaranteed, wouldn't that have generated gasps of indignation? What self-respecting majority party would allow that to happen?
With estimates that one out of four homeless people are veterans and that as many as 1,500 of those are veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan, have we approached anything that could be called a threshold of shame in our society yet?
If someone told us that a year after Democrats took over the Senate Judiciary Committee, two Democrats would cast the votes allowing a candidate for U.S. attorney general who doesn't know whether waterboarding is torture to move forward, would we have believed it?
A year after the Democrats took control of Congress, the leading Democratic presidential candidate voted to support Mr. Bush's declaration that part of the Iranian military was a terrorist operation. This is leadership? What kind of discernment is that?
When I wrote that column celebrating the Democratic takeover last year, I truly believed substituting one party for another would make a difference. Because of the cowardice -- excuse me -- "pragmatism" of the Democratic Party leadership, nothing has changed when it comes to the war.
Maybe Karl Rove and his ilk were right. Despite the humiliation the Republicans suffered a year ago, maybe there was no real change.
After the 2008 election, it may be time to give the Greens or another third party a serious look. I'm tired of these damn Democrats. To paraphrase Dylan: "I was so much younger then. I'm older than that now."
Tony Norman can be reached at tnorman@post-gazette.com
Copyright ©1997 - 2007 PG Publishing Co., Inc.



24 Comments so far
Show AllThe fact is: Democrats do not have the spine to oppose Bush in a meaningful way.
Wake up, liberal America! The democrats will sell out your interests again, and again, and again. How many times do they have to do this before you wake up and smell the organic, fair-trade coffee?
Want real representation, start voting for the party that doesn't take any corporate or PAC money- the Green Party, www.GP.org
Tony-
AFTER the 2008 "election" you'll give a 3rd party a try?!?! Guess what pal, AFTER the 2008 "election" you might not have a 3rd party anymore. You no longer have a 2nd. Just the one, with Repugs on offense, the Dims on defense, and no Ref. Good luck...
Um, how exactly was Karl Rove proven wrong? Do we actually believe the current Democratic "leadership" aren't merely Republicans in drag? Have we not been paying attention? Does anyone really believe that Hillary Clinton is a "liberal"? Or that Barak Obama is "progressive"? Does anyone believe Nancy Pelosi represents the average American citizen, who is by all accounts progressive? Are we that blind?
Karl Rove was 100% correct. We are now seeing one-party rule in this country. It's called the business party.
The only way to fight it is to replace the DEMOCRATS with independent candidates in the upcoming elections. Forget the GOP, let the Democrats attempt to replace the GOP representatives. We, true progressives, need to target the DEMOCRATS.
The Dems are not wimps, and the Dems do have a spine. The Dems are doing exactly what they want to do. They are not cowards hiding in a corner.
The problem is that what the Dems want to do is to support the same right-wing agenda as Bush. That's because they are funded by the same class in America.
All of this talk about the Dems being wimps or spineless is a part of the smokescreen to fool people. The Dems have to create the phony image of opposing the Republicans, even though they don't. Thus, every time the Dems take an action that clearly reveals their support for Bush, his appointments and his policies, the Dems have to put out a series of these smokescreen type articles that try to pretend that the Dems really opposed this but were just to 'wimpy' to actually do it. The last sentence in this article reveals the depth of the BS. The article is designed to keep people supporting the Dems through one more election. PLEASE DON'T!
Its all bull. If you don't support the idea of Mukasey being an AG who supports torture (and also Bush's right to do signing statements although the Dems have ignored that one), the YOU CAN NOT SUPPORT THE DEMOCRATS.
The Democrats are on record now as supporting Torture. Actually, they were a few years ago when they confirmed Gonzales despite his memos calling the Geneva conventions 'quaint'.
The key point is, if YOU don't support torture, YOU CAN NOT SUPPORT THE DEMOCRATS!
And, he misses the key point that Mr. Greenwald touches in his article. There are 44 Dems who say they oppose this nomination. 41 could have stopped it with a filibuster. But, of course they didn't. Surprise, surprise, surprise, there are some Democrats that are lying to you. If you equate Democrat = liar, you won't be far wrong. A few exceptions, who should really get out of that party. But generally, Democrat = Liar.
What a laugh. Every member of the house and senate needs to be waterboarded just for good measure. They have all forgotten who hired them, who pays their salaries and benefits and who expects more from them than rolling over and playing dead. Any other company would have fired them by now for not doing their number one job: Upholding the Constitution. How can you do a good job for Congress if you are too busy running for office. Any other company would have fired them for personal business on company time. Double waterboarding for candidates who merely said they opposed the candidate for Attorney General but didn't bother to vote. They make me sick.
Bravo COMarc...Outstanding annabelle
A few additional points:
If YOU do not support NAFTA,
If YOU do not support funding for Iraq,
If YOU do not support shredding the Constitution,
If YOU do not support attacking Iran,
If YOU do not support limitless wiretapping,
If YOU do not support our health program (don't get sick),
If YOU do not support environmental destruction,etc,etc,
YOU cannot support the Democrats!
I know, we will hear from you Dem apologists, enablers and apparatchiks telling us to "stay the course", stick with the nominee, give them another chance, etc.
To paraphrarse an old campaign slogan, In your heart you know it's right (to continue supporting Dems) but in My Gut I know it's nuts.
Let's take the effort, time, money, media savvy, etc wasted on trying to reform or take over the Dems or supporting the "real" Democrat, DK, and put that into building a real alternative to business as usual.
When the democrats ask you to waste your vote on their candidate in 2008, what will you do?
Will you cave in and vote for a candidate guaranteed to continue the policies that have caused so much suffering at home and abroad?
When George McGovern made it clear that he would make peace with Vietnam without conditions, the Democratic machine of that era sent out, as a last resort, Hubert Humphrey to claim that McGovern would unilaterally disarm the US in the face of the USSR.
It's part of the mixed legacy of FDR: but the price of the New Deal was the creation of the military-industrial complex. Acheson, "the Wise Men", the Best and the Brightest -- all these were industrialist Democrats.
You'll hear 'progressives' on AirAmerica complaining that they aren't socialists, because they aren't; but 21st century socialism, having learned from the betrayals of Blair, Jospin et al, is the sole path into a human and humane future.
Most elections you have a choice either a crook or a clown, sometimes two of the same. Third parties at the national level won't work until there is grassroot organization.
There should be a better way, but in 2000 people didn't vote for Gore and voted for Nader. How many think we'd be this f**d up if Gore had bad allowed to become predsident?
Most likely I'll hold my nose and vote for the Dem. However locally I will never vote for Feinstein again.
You'd vote for HILLARY???!!!
I hope there are candidates from third parties running for president, and for every open house and senate seat as I will be voting for them whomever they are. A third party president will need seats in congress to be useful.. Hopefully, Bernie Sanders will have a lot of buddies in the next congress.....
Quit trying to separate the Democrats from the Republicans. It can't be done. There is one party in D.C. and if Americans don't see that then they are asleep. We will continue to see selective enactments and enforcements as the legal infrastructure is being put into place to justify the tactics in our "War" on terror. The Constitution has been sold, and is in the hands of the Uncle Buck Party. They are going to take us back a few centuries and start all over. Something like what Pol Pot wanted to do. Keep on rockin' in the free world.
Hoa binh
I once naively thought that my vote counted. Congress and the presidency have amply demonstrated that it does not. Voting has become a waste of quality time.
The Democrats want to sell out the hard-working middle class just like the Republicans do. Shame, shame, shame on both parties! I really enjoyed reading everyone's post. Keep up the good work.
PS The American Federation of Teachers are endorsing Hilliary Clinton. She, like John Kerry,"voted for the war before she voted against it." And let's not forget that Bill and Gore enacted NAFTA.
Click here: http://www.peaceandfreedom.org/
Mukasey's confirmation is just another in a long line of despicable acts by our despicable "public servants" in Washington.
I'd like to suggest a new swearing-in ceremony for Presidents and legislators: Instead of swearing an oath to "protect and defend the Constitution," they should just take a piss on a copy of the Constitution laying under their feet. At least that would be more honest.
We are covering old ground here, my friends. Stop settling for the tyranny of limitation. Start dreaming and setting your intention on a different ( better) reality.
Your intentions have power and the clearer and cleaner the intention, the more the Universe can get behind them. If we want an alternative to the duopoly we have, it's time to stop whining and start acting as if we actually believe in we, the people, and our power to effect change.
If you don't believe that anymore, you may as well spend your time and energy at something more productive and satisfying than decrying the rigged system we have right now. It ain't gonna change folks, unless we change it, and it ain't gonna happen overnight. We are in this for the long haul. I do it for my now-adult children and my grandchildren. It's not always about winning. It's really about right action.
I can't disagree with a single sentimaent expressed above.
Well.............socialism in any form in any century has never worked, so there was one!
The fact is that the neocons still dominate all 4 branches of government: executive, legislative, judicial and media.
Damocrats or Repulsives--what difference does it make? Our country has been taken over by materialism, greed, lust for power, and extremism. The priciples this nation were founded on have been tossed aside in the mad rush for personal gain at any cost. How can we change a situation that has been many years building up and finally culminated in immense wealth and power for a privilaged few at the top of the ladder? It is not human nature to give up a lavish lifestyle for the benefit of everyone. Only an extraordinary leader could convince those that it would be to their benefit also to live in a country where there was a decent life for all people.
What will be decided in Nov 2008 is wether Rudy or Hillary will preside over the third term of the GW Bush administration.
At last the entire Congress has rolled over to play dead. Only I think they really are dead in the eyes of the voters who put them there. Congress is a circus with all of the clowns and jugglers and lions and tigers running around in circles in the big tent, all for show. We have bought our tickets but there isn't any free popcorn and the show is old and tattered, dilapidated. and in shambles. But, the show goes on and on for the benefit of a silly aging school boy. Time to find a new circus.
DUMP THE DEMS!
Anyone catch the Kucinich interview on Democracy Now! the other day? - The only Democrat worth supporting. Let's push Dennis to leave the Dumbocrats behind and run this campaign as an independent. He must know he does not fit in with this bunch of crooks, cronies, and spineless enablers of empire. Perhaps with the help of some of the campaign veterans from the Wellstone, Nader, and even Jesse Ventura campaigns we can bring real shocking change to the one-party system.
RE: "How many think we'd be this F***'D up if Gore had been allowed to become president"
I for one!
If Dennis should fail - I'll just continue to fight to bring down the current corporate-imperial government of the U.S. / JOIN ME IN THE FIGHT - WE WILL OVERCOME!
After voting for GW in 2000, I protest voted strictly along Democratic party lines in 2004. In 2008, I plan to vote strictly 3rd party. In other words, I will no longer support main-stream candidates just because they tell the best lies.