Removal of Bush, Cheney Images Doesn't Quell Debate Over Exhibit
The Kennebunk Free Library removed images of President George Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney on Tuesday from an exhibit of collages made from old American flags.
Library Director Janet Cate (jcate@kennebunk.lib.me.us) said the works did not meet "normative community standards" because of the Bush family's connection with the area, and noted that they had been the subject of complaints from the public.
"This is Mr. Bush's hometown," Cate said, referring to the Bush summer home on Walker's Point in Kennebunkport. "It is very local, and that's the community part of the normative community standards."
It was the second time in a week that controversy has arisen over G. Bud Swenson's exhibit, which includes 22 collages made from old American flags that Swenson purchased at flea markets.
Last Wednesday, Cate told Swenson that the exhibit could not go up, only to reverse her decision after Swenson met a day later with members of the library's board of trustees.
Swenson hung the collages on Tuesday and was planning to attend an opening reception from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m.
The exhibit, titled "Portraits in a Time of War," is scheduled to hang until Nov. 29.
But that could change. Board President Kate Manahan said Tuesday that a member of the public has filed a formal appeal with the board, contesting Cate's decision to let the exhibit go forward.
Manahan said the board would take up that appeal as soon as possible.
She said the board has final authority over the exhibit, but it was unclear what course of action it would take.
Swenson refused to take down the images of Bush and Cheney himself, suggesting instead that Cate turn them to face the wall. But Cate removed them and returned them to Swenson Tuesday afternoon.
Swenson described the images of Bush and Cheney as untitled portraits, made with pieces of old flags that had been taken apart and reconstructed.
"They're really quite pleasing, but Bush looks a little perplexed," Swenson said of the works. "Cheney's got kind of a smile, a grin."
Swenson said he urged Cate not to take down the paintings, "because then we're back to the censorship issue," a concern he raised last week when he was initially told that the exhibit could not be hung.
Although the dispute over the exhibit has political overtones, Manahan said an initial complaint raised concerns about whether Swenson's works are appropriate for viewing by children.
She said trustees addressed that issue when they met with Swenson last week.
"Bud (Swenson) went to great lengths to explain it would not be something that children couldn't view," she said.
Manahan said the board discussed specific works with Swenson, and he did not mention that the exhibit would include the Bush and Cheney pieces.
"We were under the impression that the portraits were all like the ones we had seen, and not of specific individuals," she said.
The library plans two community forums at which the public can meet with Swenson to discuss the exhibit and any issues it raises. Manahan said she planned to discuss the issue publicly Tuesday night.
Manahan would not say whether she felt Swenson's work does not meet community standards.
"I believe in his right to express himself," she said. "He has a right to do what he's doing."
Manahan said the library has a mission of serving the diverse educational, cultural and recreational needs of the Kennebunks. "But it's also our job to find the normative standards and to not exceed and offend," she said.
She suggested that the medium of the American flag, a key component in the controversial exhibit, is emblematic of the kind of open, democratic dialogue the library hopes to foster.
"I would encourage people to see the show if they're going to discuss it, to be willing to listen, and finally to be willing to share what they think in a respectful way," she said.
Copyright © 2007 Portland Press Herald
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
11 Comments so far
Show AllThe portraits are too good for Kennebunk.
What? Now you can't make depictions of the Roya..Bush and Cheney?
How can you even tell who they are supposed to be? These pictures don't show Cheney eating a baby or W eating a pretzel. They are untitled, the only clue is that one is bald, but that could be one of 20 million American men. Bush has black hair?
The unmentioned issue here is that these pieces were made from cut up flags. That would be a breach of flag etiquette. Amazing that the super-patriot who's complaint brought censorship to the library didn't have a problem with that.
Just learning to live with GOP hypocrisy.
The portraits of Cheney and Bush are so overly flattering that I hardly recognise them.
oh yeah and another thing - how many hometown's can one idiot king have... these people are making themselves look very very bad...
degenerate art, anyone?
i know policemen give you trouble
they cause trouble everywhere
but when you die and go to heaven
you'll find no policemen there
w. guthrie
Oh my, that is so offensive! How could anyone be forced to look at a piece of art like that?
excellent art work. i like it.
The folks who removed the images should be ashamed of themselves. I hope their neighbors publicly shame them for collaborating with Big Bush.
"The Kennebunk Free Library"
Maybe the library should ge a new name?
"The Kennebunk NOT-SO-FREE Free Library"
Sadly like the rest of our country
Free Thought has been checked out permanently.
Free thought now can be found under it's new listing in the 900s of the catalog. History.
Soon, American Democracy will be found in the 900s as well.
"political or people pleasing"
political or people pleasing the right people
perhaps we can stop the pretense that we are free to express our ideas.
the public forum is only for "accepted ideas."
Oh my. This is truly another significant measure of where we are. I thought the vision of libraries (in a free and civil society) was to be the holder and stewards that house accessable works of human expression -- not the "political or people pleasing" editorial boards that filter or censor in accordance to relative standards of acceptance. This ain't no library. Sounds like this little group needs to be charged serious overdue fees for failing to demonstrate simple democracy in a timely manner. Shame on them! Not much good old courage there -- but then again -- this is what enables the destruction of democracy and civil society.