World Toilet Summit: Sanitation Beyond Septic Tanks and Sewers
NEW DELHI - To meet one of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and halve the number of people without basic sanitation by 2015, the world must make a radical shift away from septic tanks and sewers, say experts and activists.
Gathering in New Delhi for the just concluded four-day World Toilet Summit (WTS)-2007, 400 sanitation experts from 44 countries agreed that they needed to work harder on designing toilets that suited the developing world and looked beyond 'disposal oriented' western systems.
''We don't need just toilets but toilet systems," said scientist and former president of India A.P.J. Abdul Kalam at the summit that was jointly organised by the Singapore-based World Toilet Organisation (WTO) and India's Sulabh International Social Service Organisation, with support from the Indian government. ''Toilet technologies need to be oriented towards ruggedness and reliability and minimum water usage.''
"Like the septic tank, the sewer system was first used in London in 1850 in response to thousands of cholera deaths. New York got sewers in 1860 and Calcutta in 1870. One hundred and thirty-seven years later, only 232 out of India's over 5,000 urban centres have partial flush-to-sewer connectivity. Clearly conventional systems are no answer to the world's sanitation woes," said Bindeshwar Pathak, founder of Sulabh which has developed the twin-pit sanitation technology.
''You cannot achieve the MDGs with sewers and septic tanks,'' Pathak told IPS. ''Sewers need expensive infrastructure, high maintenance and large quantities of water to be effective.''
Septic tanks, though cheaper than sewers, need regular maintenance and their contents can seep into ground water leading to infections and pollution, said Jack Sim, who heads the WTO.
The West should stop exporting and imposing its sanitation solutions like sewers to the developing world as they are often found to be unsuitable and unsustainable, said Carol McCreary of the American Restrooms Association.
The need is to shift from the conventional 'disposal-oriented' sanitation paradigm to new 'reuse-oriented' models, said Arne R. Panesar of the ECOSAN programme that works in recycling-oriented wastewater management and sanitation systems in Germany.
While the WTS-2007 showcased many technologies that could help developing countries where toilets are needed the most, not all were suitable because of local cultures and practices.
For example African Sanitation's 'AfriSan' toilet is a waterless, dry composting system pioneered in the slums of South Africa. It uses small amounts of peat moss and lets solar energy turn waste into odourless manure that is collected in a tray and emptied once a week, said AfriSan's Lukas Oosthuizen.
But Oosthuizen quickly discovered that the model was unsuitable for use in India. ''People here are washers and not wipers, and so we need to redesign so that water can be used,'' he said.
Another solution from Africa was the 'Vacu-tug', a small portable machine that empties out dry toilet pits that is revolutionising slum sanitation in Kenya. ''It has already cut down the infamous flying toilets (whereby people use a plastic bag and then fling it out of the window) of Nairobi,'' said Prof. Edward K Kairu, who heads ANEW, a trans-African water and sanitation forum.
But one of the best technologies reamins the two-pit system developed by Pathak and his Sulabh three decades ago which has transformed the lives of millions of users and scavengers in this country and abroad.
The U.N.-Habitat has recognised Sulabh's cost-effective and appropriate sanitation system as a 'Global Urban Best Practice'. The twin-pit system uses 1.5-2 litres of water per use in a flush toilet that is connected to two pits that allows recharging of the soil and composting, and a close-loop public toilet system attached to a bio-gas digester.
In fact, this is the only sanitation technology that meets the seven conditions for a sanitary latrine laid down by the World Health Organisation. These stipulate that a sanitary latrine should not contaminate surface soil, ground water or surface water. Excreta should not be accessible to flies or animals. There should be no handling of fresh excreta, or when this is unavoidable, kept to a bare minimum. There should be no odour or unsightliness and the methods used should be simple and inexpensive in construction and operation. "This is an on-site sanitation technology that can be implemented anywhere," Pathak said.
Sulabh has built more than a million such toilets in India and has recently completed five pay-and-use public toilet complexes in the Afghan capital Kabul. "We were expecting some 300 users per day to make these toilets self-sustaining. But more than 5,000 people use these toilets everyday, yielding profits and employment right from start," said Pathak.
Portable plastic toilets jointly developed by an Indian and a British firm are being manufactured in India to provide sanitation during the upcoming Beijing Olympics. "The toilet can be fixed and unfixed in an hour and at least a hundred people can use the stink-free toilet before it needs to be vacuum cleaned," said Bob Macrae, international sales director for Britain's Poly John. "It can be used at mega religious festivals like the Kumbh Mela in India, natural disasters, sports events and even the urban slums of India,'' added Prashant Trivedi, of Sintex, the Indian partner.
New responsive technologies are a good signal, said Sushmita Shekhar, member, U.N, Taskforce on Water and Sanitation. ''However, these technologies have to reach the people. Until the beneficiary sees the good in proper sanitation, he will not ask for it. And till he himself demands, there will be little acceptance for the technology," she said.
In fact the need is also to take sanitation technology from being subsidy-driven, which it so far is, and make it market-driven, said Jon Lane of the Geneva-based Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council.
"Every person uses a toilet several times a day. And 2.6 billion people worldwide still need one. So we have to see it as a blue-chip industry," said Panesar of Ecosan.
Awareness is the key, said Sim. World Toilet Summits, organised annually in different parts of the world by his organisation, are a branding exercise aimed at taking the subject of sanitation and toilets out of its taboos. "Starting with the International Year of Sanitation 2008, we have to market appropriate, eco-sustainable and user-friendly sanitation to make it viable.''
Globally 2.6 billion people, or one in three persons, lack access to proper sanitation, says the UNICEF/WHO mid-term review report on MDGs. More than half of them live in India and China. Africa and Latin America are the other regions that are lagging behind.
http://ipsnews.net/new_focus/toilet/index.asp The Neglected Goal: A Toilet Revolution
© 2007 Inter Press Service
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
10 Comments so far
Show AllI am going to take another shot at this to explane what
"in my humble opinion" is one of the best systems...
SawDust Toilets work best and clean-up best)IF there is NO Liquid
So i came up with the "DUAL System"...think about it;
many bathrooms have a flush toilet and a bedit next to it...
so this "hop from one to the other" is not so uncommon...
basically you build a "Two Seater SawDust Toilet"...
let's call the first one "NO# ONE"
and the second one "NO# TWO"...
you go "No# one" in the first SawDust Toilet...(Liquids Only)
then hop over to "No# two" and go "No# two"... NOW hop back over to "No# one"
(cover no# 2 with sawdust) and here on the "No# One sawdust toilet (liquids only)"
you have a >>Hand Held BEDIT Sparyer<< clean off and pat dry with a reusable cloth...
which you can wash and use again...you can have a stack of 100 and you will never run low...So if you are into The SawDust Toilet and do not mind the composting labor
you deal with two buckets and you never have to buy TP again... now i understand many people feel TP is the best way to go...i am certainly not going to "preach" to anyone
but consider the facts (google the cons of TP).....
what we are doing by using a Saw Dust Toilet is going VERY GREEN...
why not remove the TP and close the industrial loop!
The Answer to ALL this is Simple! anyway you want to do it... wash with WATER
a hand held sprayer hooked up works the best ...then you use cloth wipes to dry off ONCE YOU WASH AND THEN DRY ... SMELL THE CLOTH....IT IS CLEAN SMELLING! toss it in with all your wash...keep a roll of TP hanging for company...and you will never have to buy TP again! Half of the world uses water to wash their bottoms
and a darn good percentage of them use thier left hand to help the water along...
if i had to i would BUT with water pressure there is simply no need
so it comes down to this TP does what it does and it cost cash to allow you to do what it does...but you can rinse and wipe a clean bottom dry with reusable cloth...
Now if you really want to go Green build a SAWDUST TOILET one for NO#2
and next to it one for NO#1 so you start in No#1 then you scoot over to NO#2
and hop back to NO#1 to rinse off...PAT DRY with reusable cloth...
and you are AS GREEN as you can get...
I DARE ANYONE TO COME UP WITH A BETTER WAY!
Sorry, the link did not post. All the information you ever wanted to know, including downloadable forms of The Humanure Handbook, are here: www.jenkinspublishing.com
Humanure--a sawdust toilet system--is explained here:
You don't have to wait for a systemic shift, the sawdust toilet is an inexpensive, simple and gratifying way to complete the food cycle. Do it for yourself, for the planet, whatever. Save water, make soil. Reduce pollution. It's a no-brainer.
Banish the water-shitters!
WE advocate the use of sawdust toilets for all of our clients as part of the overall "package" that is part of the architectural design and engineering that goes into a "green" home. This has been met, generally, with real enthuiasm, especially.
I think that the metaphor that is expressed when we defecate into our very drinking water speaks volumes about our relationship, or lack thereof, to nature.
My family has never had a complex or flush toilet in any of the farms we have inhabited in the past 40 years... it is obvious for those of us unprejudiced and willing to endure some small amount of odor that simple sealable boxes with two composting areas are the reasonable way to go. These can be made of numerous materials and are incredibly low cost, and facilitate reuse of the compost for fundamental food production. The difficulties of coming up with a perfect design are symptomatic of the unbelievable stupidity and cupidity of the human race...as usual our prejudices and cultural hubris have obviated any sane planning for decades....we can go to Mars but can't get our shit together.....
We continually miss the point as in all environmentally friendly technologies we try to introduce into the general discussion of how to change the world for all people. We have too many special interests with billions at stake moving to block innovation.
Until the US congress reflects the will of the people who now want fundamental change in US values, systems and morals we will continue to be led by the special interests and Wall street who want everything to stay unchanged regardless of the cost to the human race!
MONEY AND POWER WITH A ROGUE GOVERNMENT IN PLACE WORKS AGAINST THE SURVIVAL OF US ALL.
Until a zero population growth strategy becomes at least a part of the solution, the problems will only keep getting worse.
If everyone would start using sawdust toilets and composting humanure, we could make all the land in the world fertile again and get reconnected with the natural cycle of life.