Common Dreams NewsCenter

Summer Reading

 
     
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
     
 

Discuss this story Discuss this story Print This Post Print This Post E-Mail This Article
 
 

Slippery Scribes Shaft Striking Screenwriters

by Glenn W. Smith

Well, that didn’t take long. No sooner did the writers grab their picket signs and head for Rockefeller Center than the New York Times belittled and mocked them, paragraph after paragraph. A bit painful, isn’t it, this writerly write-down of writers?

In the first paragraph of its initial story, Times writers, who are not on strike, managed to include the pejorative “so-called” as a modifier of “new media.” In the third paragraph the Times notes that the picketers were at times drowned out by fans of the Today Show across the street. The fourth paragraph speaks of the writers including the “trappings” of a real union strike. The fifth paragraph notes the striking screenwriters wore “arty glasses and fancy scarves.”

In the sixth paragraph, striking children’s show writer Sarah Durken says, “A lot of people probably feel like we are brats.” I’m sure a journalist’s question provoked that unfortunate frame. Then the Times writers made sure to include it high in the story.

Did you hear about the Hollywood starlet so naïve she slept with the writer? The truth is, the big money of the entertainment industry disguises an ugly truth in America: creativity is often regarded with suspicion and parsimonious neglect. The suits regard the truly creative type as a necessary freak, like a bearded lady in a carnival sideshow. You can’t have a show without her, but don’t split the take with her.

Why is this? One reason is that business-oriented minds don’t spend much time reading Emily Dickinson or William Faulkner. Where’s the practicality in that? People who are sensitive and imaginative are mysteries to them. This alienation is exacerbated by the fact that the creatives, typically motivated by values other than greed and power, don’t have the right buttons to push. You would think that an aggressive business type would be relieved to be in the presence of someone who doesn’t want his job. Instead, the creative type fills him with dread. “How can I manipulate the writer if he doesn’t care about money and power?” he asks himself.

Anyone who’s worked as a writer at a big ad agency or other bottom-line oriented enterprise has felt this awkward emotional distancing.

Which brings us back to the New York Times. Entertainment writers carrying picket signs in the streets of New York present a unique challenge to the self-image of journalists who feel themselves above the frivolous business of entertainment (until they get a story with enough melodrama to start a bidding war for the film rights). Civilizations, not ratings, rise and fall on the work of journalists. Circulation, of course, is irrelevant to the true journalist. They don’t have opening weekend numbers.

Despite the characterization by the Times, the screenwriters challenge to the status quo is just as important as a miner’s strike or auto-workers walk-out. There’s something about the soul of America at stake here. We shouldn’t forget that in Czechoslovakia, it was the creative cultural challenge to the Czech totalitarian regime by a group of entertainers, The Plastic People of the Universe , and their subsequent arrest and trial, that led to the famous Charter 77 protest in 1977 and, ultimately, the fall of the regime in 1989 and the democratic presidency of, gasp, a playwright, Vaclav Havel. Tom Stoppard’s new play, Rock & Roll, is about this. It received a wonderful review in the Times.

Okay, I’m not saying we oughta elect a screenwriter president. But, then, why is it we can make governors and presidents of actors who speak their words while dismissing the authors of the scripts that made them famous?

It’s time America got over its antipathy toward the sources of the nation’s creative power. Our poets die in obscurity, copywriters eat lunch alone, and screenwriters go unslept with. And all the while, the suits pretend they have accomplished something creatively themselves. No one in a suit ever drove a railroad spike, and not one will be published in a volume of the Library of America.

Let’s drink to the hard-working writers. Spare a thought for the rag-taggy people. Glasses, scarves, and all.

Glenn W. Smith is a Rockridge Institute Senior Fellow. He is the author of The Politics of Deceit: Saving Freedom and Democracy from Extinction

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Technorati
 

5 Comments so far

  1. since1492 November 6th, 2007 1:13 pm

    Screenwriters are a natural resource consumed by a big business. Of course they will pay them as little as possible. If there jobs could be outsourced they would be. Screenwriter, fruit picker, housekeeper, etc. they are all just resources to be used.
    Hoa binh

  2. kelmer November 6th, 2007 3:13 pm

    Screenwriting is not a free flowing form of creative expression like novel or short story writing.
    Screenwriters have to give up a huge amount of creative control–and have rewrites to suit practical considerations, director and actor whims etc.

    The most intellectually profound and progressive writing still occurs in other mediums besides film, which always plays catch up or just caters to the lowest common denominator.

  3. blessthebeasts November 6th, 2007 6:36 pm

    The NYT writers have some nerve dissing the screenwriters considering the water they have carried for the Bush administration.

  4. A Voice Apart November 6th, 2007 9:33 pm

    I hope that the screen writers achieve their goals. Don’t let the strikebreakers stop you in getting both much deserved recognition and the remuneration that is in keeping with your creativity. Those who would protest your picketing are those who have no idea that without writers, there would be no shows for them to watch.

    Maybe without the daily sedation that occurs when watching television, they will actually have to realize that the world is collapsing around them. This is not said to denigrate the artistic ability of the screen writers, but acknowledging that they are limited in what they are able to write. Should they have free reign, odds are that the contents would be much more politicized and informative.

    All those in the arts should back them in their efforts…they may be next in need of support.

  5. Jim Glover November 7th, 2007 11:44 am

    THIS IS A GREAT ARTICLE and the story about how music and The Plastic People had such a major part in the Revolution…. It makes me proud that I am a rejoined and still a member of the Musicians Union. They wanted me to join and said I can still do it my Way so I did not sign on to the old “Rules” which were self defeating for Folk Music, so now I am free to help support both the Union and the non union folk singers together.

    If Bush really wanted a change in Cuba, he would encourage all of us Old Hippies and young artists and any American to go freely to Cuba and make new friends and connections…
    Just like in Prague, there would be a new spring in Cuba and the USA.

Join the discussion:

You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)

 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org